- Boxes
- definitions
- Ellipses
- theorems and lemmas
- Blue border
- the statement of this result is ready to be formalized; all prerequisites are done
- Orange border
- the statement of this result is not ready to be formalized; the blueprint needs more work
- Blue background
- the proof of this result is ready to be formalized; all prerequisites are done
- Green border
- the statement of this result is formalized
- Green background
- the proof of this result is formalized
- Dark green background
- the proof of this result and all its ancestors are formalized
- Dark green border
- this is in Mathlib
Let \(K=(K_i)_{i=0}^{d-1}\) be a unital Kraus family, that is, \(\sum _i K_i K_i^\dagger =\mathbb {1}\). Then for all \(X\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), \(\mathcal{K}(X^\dagger X)\ge \mathcal{K}(X)^\dagger \mathcal{K}(X)\), where \(\mathcal{K}(Y)=\sum _i K_i Y K_i^\dagger \).
If the parent-ground-space dimension is eventually constant, then for every \(N{\gt}2\) it equals the number of positive loops in the sector graph. In particular, this conclusion holds under the BNT and all-chain nearest-neighbor parent-ground-space hypotheses of Theorem 14.1.70.
Under the same hypotheses, suppose additionally that every periodic single-block chain space is contained in its matrix-product-vector line. Then
Let \((C_j^s)\) and \((E_j^s)\) be two marked families over a BNT canonical form. If their closed marked chains agree for every marked index \(s\) and every unmarked word \(w\), then \(C_j^s=E_j^s\) for every representative \(j\) and every marked index \(s\).
Let \(A\) be a CPSV canonical-form renormalization fixed point, and let \((A_j)_j\) be a basis of normal tensors for \(A\). CPSV asserts that there are invertible matrices \(X_j\), positive diagonal matrices \(\rho _j\) with \(\operatorname{tr}(\rho _j)=1\), and tensors \(U_j\) such that
Thus the BNT-basis tensors share the physical index \(i\), and the family \((U_j)_j\) satisfies the source joint-isometry condition. This is the square-root-consistent form of [ CPGSV16 , Corollary 3.12 ] .
Local fix (square-root diagonal). CPSV prints a bare \(\Lambda _j\) in Corollary 3.12, whereas the reference tensor at line 1300 has coefficients \(\sqrt{(\rho _j)_{\alpha ,\alpha }}\), which forces the factor \(\sqrt{\rho _j}\) used above. This repair is documented in docs/paper-gaps/cpsv16_rfp_isometry_scope.tex.
Let \(M\) be an MPO tensor in normalized BNT-refined horizontal form. For two coefficient families \(f_{u,z}\) and \(g_{u,z}\), put \(C^u=\sum _z f_{u,z}M^z\) and \(E^u=\sum _z g_{u,z}M^z\). If \(\operatorname{tr}(C^uM^w)=\operatorname{tr}(E^uM^w)\) for every marked index \(u\) and every word \(w\), then \(C^u=E^u\) for every \(u\).
The marks are required to lie in the span of the physical letters. No assertion is made for arbitrary bond-space matrices, since off-diagonal matrices between repeated sectors are invisible to closed chains. The corollary is the physical-insertion consequence of [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.3, lines 1835–1858 ] used in the contractions of [ CPGSV16 , Proposition 4.13, lines 1909–1919 ] .
- MPSTensor.linearMarkedTensor
- MPSTensor.linearMarkedTensor_toTensorFromBlocks
- MPSTensor.SectorDecomposition.linearMarkedTensor_toTensor_eq_markedTensor
- MPSTensor.linearMarkedTensor_gauge
- MPSTensor.trace_linearMarkedTensor_mul_evalWord_gauge
- MPOTensor.IsHorizontalCF.linearMarkedTensor_eq_of_trace_agree
For \(s\in [0,1]\), \(t\in [0,1]\), and positive-definite matrices \(A_1,A_2,B_1,B_2\), the map \((A,B)\mapsto \Re \operatorname{tr}(A^s B^{1-s})\) is jointly concave:
Obtained from Theorem 20.6.13 by taking \(K=\mathbb {1}\).
For \(s\in [0,1]\), \(t\in [0,1]\), matrix \(K\), and positive-definite matrices \(A_1,A_2,B\), the map \(A\mapsto \Re \operatorname{tr}(K^\dagger A^s K B^{1-s})\) is concave:
For \(s\in [0,1]\), \(t\in [0,1]\), matrix \(K\), and positive-definite matrices \(A,B_1,B_2\), the map \(B\mapsto \Re \operatorname{tr}(K^\dagger A^s K B^{1-s})\) is concave:
Under the hypotheses of Theorem 26.10.2.27, every absorbed BNT element \(\mathcal K_s\) generates positive semidefinite operators on all nonempty periodic chains. Indeed, \(P_s^{\otimes N}\sigma ^{(N)}(K)P_s^{\otimes N}\geq 0\) and \(n_s{\gt}0\), so (??) gives \(\sigma ^{(N)}(\mathcal K_s)\geq 0\). This is the first positivity conclusion in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1753–1759 ] .
For every positive blocked length \(n\), the blocked-basis coefficients are traces of powers of the BNT-label \(\chi \)-matrices selected by the source and target label maps. Equivalently, they are traces of powers of the pulled-back blocked-basis matrices \(\chi _{n,i,j,k}\):
For every positive blocked length \(n\), the blocked-basis coefficients obtained from an existential BNT-label theorem witness are traces of powers of the BNT-label \(\chi \)-matrices selected by the source and target maps. Equivalently, they are traces of powers of the pulled-back blocked-basis \(\chi \)-matrices:
Let \(M\) be an MPO tensor and let its BNT canonical form have normal representatives \(A_x\), copy numbers \(n_x\), and copy-independent weights \(\mu _x\). Put \(\mathcal K_x=\mu _xA_x\), and assume that this canonical form generates the same matrix product vectors as \(M\) at every positive length. If the representatives \(\mathcal K_x\) have orthogonally supported commuting sector products, then
This gives the explicit GSNNCH form with the BNT copy numbers \(n_x\) as its natural multiplicities.
Let \(M\) have a nonempty basis-of-normal-tensors decomposition with positive copy numbers \(n_x\) and copy-independent weights \(\mu _x\). Put \(K_x=\mu _xA_x\), and suppose that the decomposition generates the same positive-length matrix product vectors as \(M\). If an independently supplied orthogonally supported commuting sector family realizes the tensors \(K_x\), and every \(K_x\) satisfies SAL, then \(M\) satisfies SAL.
Let \(M\) be an MPO tensor and let its BNT canonical form have normal representatives \(A_x\), copy numbers \(n_x\), and copy-independent weights \(\mu _x\). Put \(\mathcal K_x=\mu _xA_x\), and assume that this canonical form generates the same matrix product vectors as \(M\) at every positive length. Equivalently, for every \(N{\gt}0\),
Under the BNT projector-selection hypotheses, if every \(\mathcal K_x\) satisfies SAL, then \(M\) has the source GSNNCH form. Its outer sectors are the BNT sectors and its natural multiplicities are the copy numbers \(n_x\).
Let \({\cal K}\) be injective. Let \(R\) and \(\rho \) give a three-site closure of \({\cal K}\), choose a Hayashi decomposition of \(\rho \), and fix virtual indices \(\alpha _1,\beta _3\) such that \(R_{\beta _3,\alpha _1}\ne 0\). For the corresponding closed sector tensors, \(\mathcal T_{\cal K}=\sum _k |l_k)(r_k|\).
Every injective MPO tensor satisfying SAL admits an \(\eta \)-local structure. Thus there is a single positive two-site bond whose cyclic translates commute pairwise and whose ordered product is the finite-chain density operator at every length \(N\geq 2\), with normalization scalar one. This is the conclusion of Proposition C.8.
Let \(K\) be injective and satisfy SAL, and suppose that its doubled-index matrix-product tensor is normal. There is a positive physical-sector factorization whose selected two-site bond \(B\) has \(K\) itself as a normal fixed tensor representation. Its virtual dimension is the virtual dimension of \(K\), and for every \(N\geq 2\), \(\rho _N(K)=B_0B_1\cdots B_{N-1}\). In particular, the scalar is one. This is an existential statement about the bond selected in the proof of Proposition C.8; it does not assert uniqueness or normal rescalability for an arbitrary proportional commuting-bond presentation.
Let \(K_x\) be a nonempty finite family, let an orthogonally supported commuting sector family realize the tensors \(K_x\), and let \(n_x\) be positive natural numbers. Suppose that, for every \(N{\gt}0\),
If every \(K_x\) satisfies SAL, then \(M\) satisfies SAL.
Every injective MPO tensor satisfying SAL admits a physical-sector factorization such that, for every \(N\geq 1\) and every cyclic sector configuration \(k=(k_0,\ldots ,k_{N-1})\) with \(k_N=k_0\),
This is the projected-chain inequality in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, Lemma C.4, lines 1446–1450 ] . It does not assert positivity of the individual neighboring operators.
Every injective MPO tensor satisfying SAL admits a physical-sector factorization. This is only the raw algebraic factorization from Lemma C.4 and equations formK and etarl; coherent positivity of the neighboring operators, recurrence, and primitivity are not part of this conclusion.
Let \(\mathcal K\) be an injective matrix product density operator tensor satisfying the strong area law and zero correlation length. Then there are an isometry, closed sector tensors, positive neighboring operators \(\eta _{k,h}\), and real families \((a_k)_k,(b_k)_k\) such that the inverse-map sector decomposition holds and
This is the structural corollary at [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1501–1505 ] . Its printed derivation combines Lemma C.4 with the refuted Lemma C.5, so the conclusion remains open under the printed hypotheses.
Let \({\cal K}\) be an injective MPDO, let \(R\) give a three-site closure, and fix an \(\eta \)-structure and a nonzero tail entry. Let \(N\geq 1\). For a cyclic sector assignment \(k_0,\ldots ,k_{N-1}\), suppose that every concrete operator \(\eta _{k_n,k_{n+1}}\) obtained from these data is nonzero. Then there are nonzero scalars \(c_n\) such that
This is the specialization of Theorem 26.10.4.35 to the inverse-map sector operators; positivity of the cyclic product follows from the MPDO property.
Let \(M\) be a matrix product density operator in normalized BNT-refined horizontal form and suppose that it satisfies the renormalization fixed-point condition. One choice of the vertical canonical decomposition and fusion coisometries satisfies, for every \(N{\gt}0\),
Equivalently, \([A_N,T_N]=0\), as asserted in [ CPGSV16 , lines 1000–1002 ] . No additional compatibility hypothesis is imposed. This statement makes no length-independence, terminal spectral, projection, Hamiltonian, or Gibbs-state assertion.
Scope restriction (BNT-refined horizontal form): the normalized BNT-refined horizontal hypothesis is stronger than the literal CPSV canonical-form hypothesis.
- MPOTensor.BNTFusionTensorClause.topologicalDensityOperatorSucc_eq_multiplicityWeight_mul_recursiveFactor
- MPOTensor.BNTFusionTensorClause.topologicalMultiplicityWeightFactorSucc_commutes_recursiveFactor
- MPOTensor.BNTFusionTensorClause.HasTopologicalDensityFactorCommutator
- MPOTensor.BNTFusionTensorClause.hasTopologicalDensityFactorCommutator
- MPOTensor.exists_topologicalDensityDecomposition_and_factorCommutator_of_isRFPViaTS
Let \(D\geq 1\), and let \(M\) generate diagonal positive semidefinite operators at every positive chain length. If \(L+R{\gt}0\) and the trace at length \(L+R\) is positive, then the classical mutual information of its normalized diagonal coefficients satisfies \(I(X:Y)\leq 2\log D\).
Let \(m\geq 1\) and let \(\lambda _0,\ldots ,\lambda _{m-1}\in \mathbb {C}\) be nonzero. Then there is an exponent \(N\) with \(1\leq N\leq m\) such that \(\sum _{q=0}^{m-1}\lambda _q^N\neq 0\). This is the consequence of the Appendix power-sum lemma used in the proof of Lemma L [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.3, lines 1851–1858 ] ; the finite-range comparison is [ CPGSV16 , Appendix A, lines 1155–1163 ] .
Let \(A\) and \(B\) be normal tensors of positive, possibly different, bond dimensions. Suppose that, for every positive \(N\), their matrix product vectors are proportional by a nonzero scalar. Then there is \(a\in \mathbb {C}\), with \(|a|=1\), such that \(|V^{(N)}(A)\rangle =a^N|V^{(N)}(B)\rangle \) for every positive \(N\). This is the positive-length one-normal-block consequence of [ CPGSV16 , Corollary A.3 and Theorem 2.10 ] .
Let \(1\le k\) with \(k+1{\lt}D\). Then there is a map on \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) that is \(k\)-positive but not \((k+1)\)-positive; the cone of \(k\)-positive maps strictly contains the cone of \((k+1)\)-positive maps. Every inclusion between consecutive amplification dimensions below the top one is therefore strict.
Let \(P\) satisfy the auxiliary BNT sector hypotheses, with distinct basis tensors \((B_j)_j\). Then the direct sum containing one copy of each basis tensor is a renormalization fixed point if and only if every \(B_j\) has the square-root fixed-point form and \(\mathcal{E}_{j,j'}=0\) for \(j\ne j'\). This is the multiplicity-one, phase-one specialization of [ CPGSV16 , Theorem 3.11 and Corollary 3.12 ] . It concerns the direct sum of the basis representatives, not the repeated-copy tensor carrying the weights \(\mu _{j,q}\).
If the basis direct sum is a renormalization fixed point, there are also invertible matrices \(X_j\), trace-one positive diagonal matrices \(\rho _j=\operatorname{diag}(\lambda _{j,\alpha })\), and tensors \(U_j\) such that \(B_j^i=X_j\sqrt{\rho _j}\, U_j^iX_j^{-1}\), and the family \((U_j)_j\) satisfies the joint isometry condition, including the cross-block equations for \(j\ne j'\).
Let \(P\) and \(Q\) be BNT canonical forms whose total tensors generate the same MPV family at every positive length. Their total bond dimensions agree; writing the common value as \(D\), there is a unitary matrix \(U\in \mathrm{U}(D)\) such that, for every physical index \(i\),
This is the equal case of [ CPGSV16 , Corollary A.6, lines 1197–1199 ] .
Under the hypotheses of Theorem 11.3.1, there are a bijection \(\beta :J(Q)\simeq J(P)\), unitary matrices \(U_k\in \mathrm{U}(\dim Q_k)\), and phases \(\zeta _k\in \mathbb {C}\) with \(|\zeta _k|=1\), such that \(\dim P_{\beta (k)}=\dim Q_k\) and, for every \(k\) and every physical index \(i\),
This is the proportional part of [ CPGSV16 , Corollary A.6, lines 1197–1199 ] .
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D'}(\mathbb {C})\) be a trace-preserving positive linear map. Then for all density matrices \(\rho _1,\rho _2\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), \(\lVert T(\rho _1)-T(\rho _2)\rVert _{\operatorname{tr}} \leq \lVert \rho _1-\rho _2\rVert _{\operatorname{tr}}\). See [ Wol12 , Chapter 8, Eq. (8.80) ] .
Let \((A_x)_{x\in X}\) be a finite separated normal-canonical family whose blocks have positive virtual bond dimension. Then there is a positive integer \(L\) such that every blocked tensor \(A_x^{[L]}\) is one-site injective. The same conclusion holds simultaneously for two finite separated normal-canonical families whose blocks have positive virtual bond dimension.
Here the family is a basis of normal-canonical representatives in the sense of Definition 9.9.1.2; the blocks are distinct and the weight moduli are non-increasing but need not be strictly ordered. The representative family is assumed to have been selected; this statement does not reconstruct the full CPSV sector decomposition with repeated copies inside one sector. This scope restriction is recorded in docs/paper-gaps/ft_one_copy_scope_restriction.tex.
Let \(A\) be an MPS tensor with bond dimension \(D\ge 1\), satisfying \(\sum _i(A^i)^\dagger A^i=\mathbb {1}\), and suppose that \(A\) is primitive in the sense of Definition 8.1.1.3. If some Kraus operator \(A^{i_0}\) is invertible, then
Let \(A\) be an MPS tensor with bond dimension \(D\ge 1\), satisfying \(\sum _i(A^i)^\dagger A^i=\mathbb {1}\), and suppose that \(A\) is primitive in the sense of Definition 8.1.1.3. If some Kraus operator \(A^{i_0}\) is non-invertible and has an eigenvector \(\varphi \neq 0\) with nonzero eigenvalue \(\mu \), then
For a complex-linear map \(E:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), set
These are [ Wol12 , Equations (5.11)–(5.12) ] , with the source’s convention that the subscript records the side on which \(A\) multiplies the varying matrix.
A complex-linear map \(E:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) satisfies the Schwarz inequality if, for every \(A\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\),
This is [ Wol12 , Equation (5.2) ] .
The length-\(2\) blocked on-site action of \(\mathbb {Z}_2 \times \mathbb {Z}_2\) on the \(9\)-dimensional blocked physical space is the Kronecker square \(g \longmapsto P_g \otimes P_g\) of the single-site spin-\(1\) \(\pi \)-rotation representation \(P_g\) that implements the symmetry of Theorem 17.2.4. Identifying the blocked physical index with the pair of single-site indices, the entry of \(P_g \otimes P_g\) at \((i_1 i_2, j_1 j_2)\) is the product \((P_g)_{i_1 j_1}(P_g)_{i_2 j_2}\) over the two grouped sites. This is the on-site action that makes the blocked twist agree with blocking the single-site twist.
The Cartesian presentation of the AKLT tensor has \(d = 3\), \(D = 2\), and \(A^x = \sigma _x\), \(A^y = \sigma _y\), \(A^z = \sigma _z\), the three Pauli matrices. This is the rotationally natural form used in [ CPGSV21 ] (around line 1159); it is the AKLT state in the Cartesian basis of the spin-\(1\) site, the counterpart of the \(|m\rangle \)-basis form of Definition 17.2.1.
The AKLT factor system on \(\mathbb {Z}_2 \times \mathbb {Z}_2\) is \(\omega (g,h) = (-1)^{(g_1 + g_2)\, h_1}\) (the value \(-1\) when \(g_1 + g_2 = 1\) and \(h_1 = 1\), and \(1\) otherwise). It is the factor system of the explicit projective representation with virtual gauges \(i\sigma _y\) and \(\sigma _z\); the diagonal term \(g_1 h_1\) relative to the cluster case reflects \((i\sigma _y)^2 = -\mathbb {1}\).
Set \(d = 3\) (spin-1) and \(D = 2\). The AKLT tensor is the family \(\{ A^0, A^1, A^2\} \subset M_{2}(\mathbb {C})\) defined via the Pauli matrices by
Here \(\sigma _z = |0\rangle \! \langle 0| - |1\rangle \! \langle 1|\), so equivalently \(A^1 = \frac{1}{\sqrt{3}} \sigma _+\) and \(A^2 = -\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}} \sigma _-\) for \(\sigma _+ = \sqrt{2} |0\rangle \! \langle 1|\) and \(\sigma _- = \sqrt{2} |1\rangle \! \langle 0|\). Equivalently, the matrices are the Clebsch–Gordan coefficients coupling spin-\(1\) and spin-\(\tfrac 12\) to spin-\(\tfrac 12\).
For an MPS tensor \(A\), let \(\operatorname{alg}(A)\) be the unital \(\mathbb {C}\)-subalgebra of \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) generated by the matrices \(\{ A^i\} _{i=0}^{d-1}\): \(\operatorname{alg}(A)=\mathbb {C}\langle A^i:i=0,\ldots ,d-1\rangle \subseteq M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\).
For an Appendix B structural datum and a periodic chain of length \(N{\gt}2\), set \(p_i=h_i^{(N)}\) for \(i\in \mathbb Z/N\mathbb Z\), where \(h_i^{(N)}\) is the translated length-two parent interaction. These maps are idempotent and commute pairwise: adjacent commutation follows from Theorem 14.1.60, while disjoint length-two interactions commute by locality.
Suppose that \(A\) is equipped with Appendix B structural data \((X,\Lambda ,U)\): the matrix \(X\) is invertible, the diagonal entries of \(\Lambda \) are strictly positive, \(A^i=X\Lambda U^iX^{-1}\), and \(U\) satisfies the pair-index isometry equation below. Let \(\mathcal H_a\) and \(\mathcal H_b\) have bases indexed by \(\alpha ,\beta \in \{ 0,\ldots ,D-1\} \). The coefficients \(U^i_{\alpha ,\beta }\) define maps
and
For every \(N\geq 0\), the coefficients of \(U\) define
with
The conjugate coefficient map is
This is the tensor power occurring in the basic-vector expression [ CPGSV16 , Equation (3.17) ] .
The \(AX\) coefficient-space representative is, before the \(AX\)-lift, the canonical two-site parent interaction of the core tensor, \(\widehat Q_{AX}=q_2(A_{\mathrm{core}})\). The source projector \(Q_{AX}\) of Definition D.2 acts on \(\mathcal H_A\otimes \mathcal H_X\). The displayed operator is the two-site coefficient representative that will be placed on the \(AX\) face; it is not by itself the construction of that source projector.
The \(XB\) coefficient-space representative is, before the \(XB\)-lift, the same coefficient-space representative, \(\widehat Q_{XB}=\widehat Q_{AX}\). The source projector \(Q_{XB}\) of Definition D.2 acts on \(\mathcal H_X\otimes \mathcal H_B\). The displayed operator is the coefficient representative later placed on the \(XB\) face.
Put \(|\varphi \rangle =\sum _b\lambda _b|b,b\rangle \). For outer-boundary coefficients \(v_{a,c}\), insertion of this vector on the middle virtual bond is the map \(I_\varphi \) defined by
The two-site physical map is \(U^{\otimes 2}I_\varphi \). A boundary matrix \(Y\) determines outer-boundary coefficients by \((v_Y)_{a,c}=\lambda _aY_{c,a}\). Opening the outer virtual bond in the two-site contraction of [ CPGSV16 , Equations (3.17)–(3.18) ] gives these coefficients.
Write \(s=\langle \varphi ,\varphi \rangle =\sum _b\lambda _b^2\). The orthogonal projector onto \(\mathbb {C}\varphi \) has pair-index coefficients
On three virtual site pairs, let \(P_{01}\) place this projector on the bond joining the right index of site zero to the left index of site one, and let \(P_{12}\) place it on the next bond.
Let \(a\to a\) be a positive loop and choose a nonzero vector \(\varphi _a\in \operatorname{ran}P_{a,a}\). In sector coordinates define the matrix product tensor \((C_a^{(r,l)})_{x,y}=\delta _{x,l}\varphi _a(r,y)\) and set it to zero outside sector \(a\). The physical loop tensor is the image of \(C_a\) under the one-site unitary of the spatial decomposition. Its associated cyclic product pairs the right factor at site \(n\) with the left factor at site \(n+1\). The corresponding \(N\)-site product state is denoted by \(\Psi _a^{(N)}\in (\mathbb {C}^d)^{\otimes N}\).
- MPSTensor.BeigiSectorGraphData.loopBondVector
- MPSTensor.BeigiSectorGraphData.loopBondVector_mem
- MPSTensor.BeigiSectorGraphData.loopBondVector_ne_zero
- MPSTensor.BeigiSectorGraphData.loopCoordinateTensor
- MPSTensor.BeigiSectorGraphData.loopTensor
- MPSTensor.BeigiSectorGraphData.loopCyclicProduct
- MPSTensor.BeigiSectorGraphData.loopProductState
- MPSTensor.BeigiSectorGraphData.loopProductStateES
Let \(\Phi _a=(\varphi _a(r,l))_{r,l}\) and write \(r_a=\operatorname{rank}\Phi _a\). Choose a rank factorization
The tensor on the minimal Schmidt support is
again extended by zero outside sector \(a\). Its physical tensor is its image under the same one-site unitary.
- MPSTensor.BeigiSectorGraphData.loopSchmidtRank
- MPSTensor.BeigiSectorGraphData.LoopSchmidtFactorization
- MPSTensor.BeigiSectorGraphData.loopSchmidtFactorization
- MPSTensor.BeigiSectorGraphData.minimalLoopCoordinateTensor
- MPSTensor.BeigiSectorGraphData.minimalLoopTensor
- MPSTensor.BeigiSectorGraphData.minimalLoopCoordinateTensor_sector_apply
- MPSTensor.BeigiSectorGraphData.minimalLoopCoordinateTensor_sector_ne
Let \(\nu _a=\lVert \varphi _a\rVert _2{\gt}0\), where the norm is the Hilbert-space norm of the bond vector, or equivalently the Frobenius norm of \(\Phi _a\). In either coordinate system, the normalized representative is \(\widehat C_a=\nu _a^{-1}\widetilde C_a\). The raw coordinate and physical tensors are retained separately.
Suppose that a one-site unitary identifies the physical Hilbert space with a finite direct sum
and that in these coordinates the complementary two-site interaction is \(\bigoplus _{a,b}\mathbb {1}_{a,l}\otimes P_{a,b}\otimes \mathbb {1}_{b,r}\), where each \(P_{a,b}\) is an orthogonal projector. The directed edge \(a\to b\) is present precisely when \(\operatorname{ran}P_{a,b}\) is nonzero. An ordered cycle of length \(N\) is a sequence \((a_0,\ldots ,a_{N-1})\) for which every cyclically adjacent edge \(a_n\to a_{n+1}\) is present. Cyclic rotations are not identified. This is the graph following equation (2) of [ Bei12 , Section III ] .
For a bipartite density operator \(\rho \in M_{d_A}(\mathbb {C})\otimes M_{d_B}(\mathbb {C})\), its operator-Schmidt rank is the least integer \(r\) for which there are matrices \(A_t\in M_{d_A}(\mathbb {C})\) and \(B_t\in M_{d_B}(\mathbb {C})\) satisfying
No Hermiticity or positivity condition is imposed on the factors. This is the definition in [ DlCDN19 , Equation (1) ] ; the same formula defines the rank of an arbitrary complex bipartite matrix.
For a block of \(L\) spin–ancilla pairs, regroup
and trace the ancillary factor. Denote this map by \(\operatorname{Tr}_{\mathrm{anc},L}\). It is the blockwise analog of the one-site ancillary trace in Definition 26.5.3.
Given \(r\) blocks with bond dimensions \((D_k)_{k=1}^r\), per-block tensors \(\{ A_k^i\} \), and scaling factors \((\mu _k)_{k=1}^r\), the associated block-diagonal tensor is the tensor of total bond dimension \(D = \sum _{k=1}^r D_k\) defined by
For a fixed system size \(N\), a block length \(L\le N\), and an MPO tensor \(M\) such that \(\rho ^{(N)}(M)\) is positive semidefinite, let
denote the normalized state and the reduced state of the first \(L\) of \(N\) spins. The \(L\)-block entropy is \(S_L^{(N)}(M)=S(\rho _L^{(N)}(M))\).
For natural numbers \(r,s\), let \(C=C_{r,s}\in \mathbb {C}^{r\times (r+s)}\) be the rectangular \(r\times (r+s)\) matrix whose rows are the first \(r\) rows of the identity on \(\mathbb {C}^{r+s}\): \(C_{ij}=1\) if \(j=i{\lt}r\) and \(0\) otherwise.
Given a tensor \(A\) and a blocking length \(L\), the \(L\)-blocked tensor is the tensor with physical index set \(\{ 0,\ldots ,d{-}1\} ^L\) (hence physical dimension \(d^L\)) and the same bond dimension \(D\), whose matrices are indexed by words \((i_1, \ldots , i_L) \in \{ 0,\ldots ,d{-}1\} ^L\):
Blocking coarse-grains \(L\) neighbouring sites into one tensor: the inner virtual bonds are contracted, the \(L\) physical legs merge into a single composite index, and the two outer bonds remain as the bond of \(A^{[L]}\).
For a fixed blocked length \(m\), the fixed-length form of the block-injective canonical-form condition is
Equivalently,
This is the fixed-length form of the block-injective canonical-form condition of [ CPGSV21 , lines 2113–2117 ] .
A basis of normal tensors (BNT) for a total tensor \(A_{\mathrm{tot}}\) consists of \(g\) block tensors \((A_1, \ldots , A_g)\) with bond dimensions \((D_1, \ldots , D_g)\) such that each \(A_j\) is normal (Definition 2.4.4); at each system size \(N\geq 1\) the MPV of \(A_{\mathrm{tot}}\) lies in the span of the block MPVs \(\{ |V^{(N)}(A_j)\rangle \} _{j=1}^g\); and for sufficiently large \(N\) those block MPVs are linearly independent. Here normality means eventual block injectivity, as in Definition 2.4.4. Thus this is the algebraic form of [ CPGSV21 , Definition IV.2 ] , rather than its primitive-channel formulation. In the canonical-form characterization of [ CPGSV16 , Section 2.3 ] , a BNT is a minimal family of representatives for \(\widetilde A_k^i=e^{i\phi _k}X_kA_j^iX_k^{-1}\) among the normal blocks.
The coefficient form of a basis of normal tensors: each block \(A_j\) is a CPSV normal tensor (Definition 9.6.1), the MPV of \(A\) is given at every positive length by explicit coefficients \(c_j^{(N)} \in \mathbb {C}\) with \(|V^{(N)}(A)\rangle = \sum _{j=1}^{g} c_j^{(N)} |V^{(N)}(A_j)\rangle \), and the block MPVs \(\{ |V^{(N)}(A_j)\rangle \} \) are eventually linearly independent. This is the literal coefficient-form definition of [ CPGSV16 , Section 2.3 ] . It differs from Definition 10.1.1 only in the chosen normality predicate. Theorem 10.2.3 proves the implication between the two forms.
Here, a block-injective canonical form for a tensor consists of:
a number of blocks \(r \ge 1\),
bond dimensions \(D_1, \ldots , D_r\),
injective tensors \(\{ A_k^i\} _{i=0}^{d-1}\) with \(A_k^i \in M_{D_k}(\mathbb {C})\) for each block \(k \in \{ 1,\ldots ,r\} \),
scaling factors \(\mu _1, \ldots , \mu _r \in \mathbb {C}\).
The associated tensor is the block-diagonal tensor
This block-injective formulation of the canonical form is used in [ PGVWC07 ] ; see also [ CPGSV21 ] for the normal canonical form.
For \(N{\gt}0\) and \(L\le N\), define the periodic parent-Hamiltonian ground space
Here the condition \(\psi |_{[i,i+L-1]}\in G_L(A)\) means that, for every choice of physical indices outside the window, the restriction of \(\psi \) to that window lies in \(G_L(A)\). The one-index notation \(G_L(A)\) denotes the local ground space \(\mathcal G_L\) of [ CPGSV21 , Section IV.C ] . The two-index notation \(\mathcal G_{N,L}(A)\) used here denotes the periodic intersection of those local constraints over all translated length-\(L\) windows on the \(N\)-site ring. When \(N=0\) or \(L{\gt}N\), set \(\mathcal G_{N,L}(A):=\top \) by convention.
For a linear map \(T : M_{D}(\mathbb {C}) \to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), the channel determinant \(\det T\) is the determinant of the matrix of \(T\) with respect to the standard matrix-unit basis of \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\). This is the quantity studied in [ Wol12 , Section 6.1 ] .
The Choi matrix of a linear map \(T : M_{D}(\mathbb {C}) \to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) is
Concretely, \(\tau _{(i_1,i_2),(j_1,j_2)} = \frac{1}{D}\, (T(E_{i_2 j_2}))_{i_1 j_1}\) where \(E_{i_2 j_2}\) is the matrix unit. This is the Choi–Jamiol\- kowski convention of [ Wol12 , Proposition 2.1 ] .
For \(X\in M_{D,k}(\mathbb {C})(\mathbb {C})\) and a Choi matrix \(\tau \), the right-factor compression in the blockwise ampliation index convention has entries
The associated vector has coefficients \(D^{-1/2}X_{i,p}\).
For \(X\in M_{D,k}(\mathbb {C})(\mathbb {C})\), let \(R_X\) be the matrix from \(\mathbb {C}^D\otimes \mathbb {C}^D\) to \(\mathbb {C}^D\otimes \mathbb {C}^k\) with entries
On the cyclic index set \(\mathbb {Z}/d\mathbb {Z}\), the Choi-type map is
where \(D\) keeps the diagonal of a matrix and \(U_{k0}\) is the cyclic shift by \(k\).
The cluster-state factor system on \(\mathbb {Z}_2 \times \mathbb {Z}_2\) is \(\omega (g,h) = (-1)^{g_2\, h_1}\) (the value \(-1\) when \(g_2 = 1\) and \(h_1 = 1\), and \(1\) otherwise). It is the factor system of the explicit projective representation with virtual gauges \(\sigma _z\) and \(\sigma _x\), both squaring to the identity, so there is no diagonal term.
Set \(d = D = 2\). The cluster-state tensor is the family \(\{ A^0, A^1\} \subset M_{2}(\mathbb {C})\) defined by
where \(|\pm \rangle = \tfrac {1}{\sqrt{2}}(|0\rangle \pm |1\rangle )\). The review [ CPGSV21 ] writes the reflected convention \(A^0 = |0\rangle \! \langle +|\), \(A^1 = |1\rangle \! \langle -|\); the transpose taken here is the same state read in the opposite direction and carries the same SPT order.
Two cocycles \(\omega _1,\omega _2\) are cohomologous (written \(\omega _1 \sim \omega _2\)) if there exists \(\varphi \colon G \to \mathbb {C}^{\times }\) such that, for all \(g,h \in G\),
The commutator form of the Lindblad equation writes the generator as
where \([A,B] = AB - BA\). This is [ Wol12 , Equation (7.22) ] .
Transfer-map covariance is the identity that the transfer map commutes with virtual conjugation:
In doubled-layer notation, the virtual operators slide through the local transfer cell:
In the transfer-map language, the commutation of the doubled transfer matrix \(E = \sum _i A_i \otimes \bar A_i\) with \(V \otimes \bar V\) is
For an idempotent \(P\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), the subspace \(\{ X\mid PXP=X\} \) and the corner \(\{ PXP\mid X\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\} \) are identified as \(\mathbb {C}\)-linear spaces by the identity on underlying matrices.
For every \(\lambda _2\in \mathbb {C}\), define the associated correlation-length quantity by
For a nonzero subleading eigenvalue in the physical range \(0{\lt}|\lambda _2|{\lt}1\), this quantity is positive. If all subleading spectral values vanish and correlations therefore vanish after finitely many transfer steps, the total definition gives the limiting value \(\xi =0\).
A linear map \(E : M_{D}(\mathbb {C}) \to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) is completely positive (CP) if it admits a Kraus representation: there exist operators \(\{ K_i\} _{i=0}^{r-1}\) with \(K_i \in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) such that, for every \(X \in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\),
The Kraus representation also gives entrywise positivity on every positive block matrix by Theorem 4.2.1, and hence the associated completely positive map between matrix \(C^*\)-algebras in Theorem 4.2.2.
Let \(A\) have bond dimension \(D\). It is in the canonical form of [ CPGSV16 , Section 2.3 ] if there are positive integers \(D_1,\ldots ,D_r\), normal tensors \(A_k\) of bond dimension \(D_k\), weights \(\mu _k\in \mathbb {C}\), and, writing \(S=\sum _kD_k\), a matrix \(U\in \mathbb {C}^{S\times D}\) such that \(S\le D\) and, for every physical index \(i\),
Thus the complement of the retained direct sum consists literally of zero bond-space coordinates. In particular, \(r=0\) is possible only when \(A=0\).
The convention in line 246 of [ CPGSV16 ] is a separate normalization of these data, not part of canonical-form membership:
No weight is required to be nonzero, and no ordering or separation condition is imposed.
The basis-of-normal-tensors refinement is Definition 10.1.1; it is not part of canonical form itself.
In canonical form II of [ CPGSV16 , Appendix A ] , there are positive retained dimensions \(D_k\), normal tensors \(A_k\), weights \(\mu _k\), and, for \(S=\sum _kD_k\le D\), a matrix \(U\in \mathbb {C}^{S\times D}\) such that, for every physical index \(i\),
Thus omitted bond-space coordinates are literally zero. Every retained block additionally satisfies
where \(\Lambda _k\) is diagonal and positive definite. The two displayed equations are the only additional blockwise conditions; no ordering, injectivity, gauges, or basis-of-normal-tensors assumptions are included. The line-246 convention (??) remains a separate condition on the underlying canonical-form data.
Given an MPS tensor \(A\) and a vector \(\varphi \in \mathbb {C}^D\), the cumulative vector span is
This is [ SPGWC10 , proof of Lemma 2(a) ] .
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\). A block-permutation structure for \(T\) consists of a finite index set \(\iota \), a family of orthogonal projections \(P_k\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) for \(k\in \iota \), and a permutation \(\sigma \in \mathrm{Sym}(\iota )\), not necessarily a single cycle, such that, for every \(k\in \iota \) and \(X\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\),
In general, \(\sigma \) may have multiple disjoint cycles.
A map \(\Phi \colon M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) is completely copositive if \(\Phi \circ \theta \) is completely positive, where \(\theta \) is transposition. It is decomposable if \(\Phi =\Phi _{\mathrm{cp}}+\Phi _{\mathrm{ccp}}\) with \(\Phi _{\mathrm{cp}}\) completely positive and \(\Phi _{\mathrm{ccp}}\) completely copositive. It is indecomposable if it is positive and not decomposable.
The set of density matrices in \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) is
Let
and let \(\mathcal H_A=\bigoplus _{k\in I}\mathbb {C}^{n_k}\) and \(\mathcal H_B=\bigoplus _{l\in J}\mathbb {C}^{m_l}\). Write \(\iota _A,\iota _B\) for the block-diagonal embeddings and \(\pi _A,\pi _B\) for diagonal-block compression. For a linear map \(T:\mathcal A\to \mathcal B\), its canonical full-matrix extension is
For \(X\in \mathcal A\) and \(Y\in \mathcal B\), the trace adjoint \(T^*:\mathcal B\to \mathcal A\) is defined by
This is the block-diagonal realization needed for the fixed-point and classification arguments in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.4, lines 1980–2003 ] . It is only an auxiliary construction: it does not assert the classification conclusion of that passage.
A linear map \(T : M_{D}(\mathbb {C}) \to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) is doubly-stochastic if \(T(\mathbb {1})\propto \mathbb {1}\) and the reduced density matrix \(\operatorname{tr}_{1}[\tau ]\) of its Choi matrix \(\tau =(T\otimes \operatorname{id})(|\Omega \rangle \! \langle \Omega |)\) is proportional to the identity. This is the normal form in [ Wol12 , Proposition 2.9 ] .
A family of linear maps \(T : \mathbb {R}\to (M_{D}(\mathbb {C}) \to _{\ell } M_{D}(\mathbb {C}))\) is a dynamical semigroup if
(semigroup law) \(T_{t+s} = T_t \circ T_s\) for all \(t,s \ge 0\); and
(initial condition) \(T_0 = \operatorname{id}\).
This is [ Wol12 , Equation (7.1) ] .
Let \(d_A{\gt}0\) and let \(\rho _{BC}\) be positive semidefinite. Define
Under the canonical reassociation from \(A\times (B\times C)\) to \((A\times B)\times C\), the right partial trace removes \(C\).
Let \(\rho _A\) and \(\rho _{BC}\) be positive semidefinite, and define
We use the canonical reassociation from \(A\times (B\times C)\) to \((A\times B)\times C\), so that the right partial trace removes \(C\).
If \(P_A\) is the support projection of \(\rho _A\), define
Given a word \(w = (i_1, \ldots , i_L) \in \{ 0,\ldots ,d{-}1\} ^L\), the word evaluation is the matrix product
The empty word evaluates to the identity, \(A^\varnothing = \mathbb {1}_D\). In tensor-network notation,
in which each black node denotes the same local tensor \(A\), the virtual legs remain open, and the physical legs are labelled by the word \((i_1,\ldots ,i_L)\).
Two tensors \(A\) and \(B\) are eventually nonzero proportional if, for all sufficiently large \(N\), there is a nonzero scalar \(c_N \in \mathbb {C}\) such that \(|V^{(N)}(A)\rangle = c_N |V^{(N)}(B)\rangle \). This auxiliary form is used with the eventual linear-independence statement Lemma F.1.10.
Given a generator \(L \in \operatorname{End}_{\mathbb {C}}(M_{D}(\mathbb {C}))\), the exponential semigroup is
For \(t{\gt}0\), set \(h(t)=-t\log t\), and set \(h(0)=0\). The entropy of a probability distribution \(a=(a_z)_{z\in Z}\) on a finite set is \(H(a)=\sum _{z\in Z}h(a_z)\). For a joint probability distribution \(P\) with row and column marginals \(p\) and \(q\), put
Let \(X\) and \(Y\) be finite sets. A matrix \(P=(P_{x,y})_{x\in X,y\in Y}\) is a joint probability distribution if \(P_{x,y}\geq 0\) for every \(x\in X\) and \(y\in Y\), and
Its row and column marginals are respectively
For square matrices \(A_n\) indexed by \(n=0,\ldots ,N-1\), possibly with different index types, their finite Kronecker product is the matrix with entries
Let \(R_1\) identify an \((N+1)\)-tuple with its first coordinate and the remaining \(N\)-tuple. Let \(R_2\) identify an \((N+2)\)-tuple with its first two coordinates and the remaining \(N\)-tuple.
Let \(Y\in M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\), and write physical indices of an \((L+1)\)-site block as \(I=(i_0,\ldots ,i_L)\) and \(J=(j_0,\ldots ,j_L)\). The induced matrix on the blocked physical space is
A Fitting decomposition of a linear endomorphism \(f:V\to V\) on a finite-dimensional vector space over an algebraically closed field consists of:
\(f\) is nilpotent on the generalized \(0\)-eigenspace,
\(f\) is invertible on each generalized \(\mu \)-eigenspace for \(\mu \neq 0\),
the generalized eigenspaces span \(V\),
the generalized eigenspaces are linearly independent.
Given a linear map \(E:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) and a fixed point \(\rho \) with \(E(\rho )=\rho \) and \(\operatorname{tr}(\rho )\neq 0\), the fixed-point projection is the rank-one map
This projects onto the span of \(\rho \) along the kernel of the trace functional. When the fixed point is unique up to scaling, this span is the full fixed-point space.
The flip operator \(F\) on \(\mathbb {C}^d \otimes \mathbb {C}^d\) is
Its matrix entries are
The matched flattened data are the functions \(\widetilde\mu \), \(\widetilde P\), and \((k,q)\mapsto X_k\) defined above on the flattened copy coordinates of \(Q\).
The sector bijection, copy bijections, and bond-dimension equalities induce an equivalence of the dependent triples \((j,q,a)\) and \((k,q',a')\). After flattening the dependent bond coordinate, this gives an equivalence of the standard total bond-index sets.
Two tensors \(A\) and \(B\) of the same bond dimension \(D\) are gauge equivalent if there exists an invertible matrix \(X \in \mathrm{GL}_D(\mathbb {C})\) such that, for every \(i \in \{ 0,\ldots ,d{-}1\} \),
In tensor-network notation, (??) is represented by
where the black node denotes the tensor \(A\), the upper leg is the physical index \(i\), and the two red side nodes denote the gauge matrices acting on the virtual legs.
Two tensors \(A\) and \(B\) are gauge-phase equivalent if there exist \(X \in \mathrm{GL}_D(\mathbb {C})\) and \(\zeta \in \mathbb {C}\setminus \{ 0\} \) such that, for every physical index \(i\),
A generator decomposition consists of a completely positive map \(\phi : M_{d}(\mathbb {C}) \to M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\) and a matrix \(\kappa \in M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\), defining the linear map
This is [ Wol12 , Equation (7.14) ] .
Set \(d = D = 2\). The GHZ tensor is the family \(\{ A^0, A^1\} \subset M_{2}(\mathbb {C})\) defined by
For a system of \(N\) sites, the resulting MPV is the GHZ state
The virtual \(\mathbb {Z}_2\) representation on the bond space is the homomorphism \(\mathbb {Z}_2 \to M_{2}(\mathbb {C})\) sending the identity to \(I\) and the generator to \(\sigma _z = \operatorname{diag}(1, -1)\).
Given per-block gauges \(X_k \in \mathrm{GL}_{D_k}(\mathbb {C})\), form the block-diagonal element \(\bigoplus _k X_k\) and then reindex the dependent block-coordinate space with the standard bond index \(\{ 0,\ldots ,\sum _k D_k-1\} \) of the assembled tensor. The result is an element of \(\mathrm{GL}_{\sum _k D_k}(\mathbb {C})\).
Let \(\iota _L\colon (\{ 0,\ldots ,d{-}1\} ^{L}\to \mathbb {C})\simeq \ell ^2(\{ 0,\ldots ,d{-}1\} ^{L})\) be the canonical computational-basis identification. The local ground space under this \(\ell ^2\) identification is \(G_L^{\mathrm{ES}}(A):=\iota _L(G_L(A)) \subseteq \ell ^2(\{ 0,\ldots ,d{-}1\} ^{L})\).
The map \(\Gamma _L\) in (??) is a \(\mathbb {C}\)-linear map from \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) to \((\{ 0,\ldots ,d{-}1\} ^{L}\to \mathbb {C})\). In tensor-network notation,
The chain denotes the word tensor \(A^\sigma \) with open physical indices \(\sigma _1,\ldots ,\sigma _L\), and the red capsule denotes the boundary matrix \(X\) inserted on the closing virtual bond before taking the trace. The brace records the chain length \(L\).
Condition (4): there exists a nontrivial projector \(P\) and a Lindblad form \((H,\{ L_j\} )\) for \(L\) such that \((\mathbb {1}-P)L_jP=0\) and \((\mathbb {1}-P)\kappa P=0\) for all \(j\), where \(\kappa =iH+\frac{1}{2}\sum _jL_j^\dagger L_j\).
Let \(\mathbb K\) denote either \(\mathbb {R}\) or \(\mathbb {C}\), and let \(V\) be a normed vector space over \(\mathbb K\). A linear endomorphism \(f:V\to V\) has bounded orbits if, for every \(x\in V\), the set \(\{ f^n x:n\in \mathbb {N}\} \) is bounded.
The structure used below records only the idempotent-product consequence of the parent commuting Hamiltonian condition of [ CPGSV16 , Appendix D.2 ] . It consists of commuting idempotent endomorphisms \(P_{AX}\) and \(P_{XB}\) such that, for the idempotent \(P_K\) associated to \(K\), \(P_{AX}\circ P_{XB}=P_K\). In the source, this is the equation obtained from local projectors \(Q_{AX}\) and \(Q_{XB}\) satisfying \([Q_{AX},Q_{XB}]=0\) and \(K_{AXB}=(K_{AX}\otimes H_B)\cap (H_A\otimes K_{XB})\).
An MPS tensor \(A\) has an invariant projection if there exists an orthogonal projection \(P\) with \(P\neq 0\), \(P\neq \mathbb {1}\), and \((\mathbb {1}-P)A^iP=0\) for all \(i\). A tensor is irreducible if it has no nontrivial invariant projection (Definition 9.1.1.1).
For a fixed chain length \(N\), this condition is the conjunction of the nearest-neighbor commutation equation, the zero-energy equation for the MPS vector, and the ground-space spanning equation:
The source statement in [ CPGSV16 , Theorem 3.10(iii) ] quantifies this condition over all \(N{\gt}2\).
This is the source quantification in [ CPGSV16 , Theorem 3.10(iii) ] . For every \(N{\gt}2\), the fixed-chain condition of Definition 14.1.16 holds:
This condition records the ground-space spanning equation, but does not prove it for a concrete canonical-form tensor.
A tensor has physical string order in the sense of [ PGWS\(^{+}\)08 , display SOP, lines 112–122 ] if there exist a unitary \(u\ne \mathbb {1}\) and physical endpoint operators \(x,y\) for which Definition 12.3.5 holds. The comparison with arbitrary virtual boundary matrices is a separate endpoint- realizability statement.
A bipartite matrix \(\rho \) on \(M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\otimes M_{d'}(\mathbb {C})\) has Schmidt number at most \(n\) when it is a finite sum of pure-state projectors of Schmidt rank at most \(n\),
A completely positive map \(E\) on \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) has the restricted CP spectral properties used here if there exist a positive real number \(r\), a positive definite right eigenvector \(\rho \), and a positive definite left eigenvector \(\sigma \) for the adjoint map such that
every positive semidefinite right eigenvector for eigenvalue \(r\) is a scalar multiple of \(\rho \), and the spectral radius of \(E\) is equal to \(r\). The uniqueness clause concerns only positive semidefinite Perron eigenvectors. Unlike the full nondegenerate-eigenspace statement in [ Wol12 , Theorem 6.4 ] , it does not assert that every complex eigenvector at \(r\) is proportional to \(\rho \).
For boundary matrices \(X,Y\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), set explicitly
The virtual-boundary nondecay predicate holds for \(u\) and \(\Lambda \) if there exist \(X,Y\) and a positive constant \(c{\gt}0\) such that \(c\le \| R_L(u;X,Y)\| \) for every \(L\). Thus some virtual-boundary sequence does not decay to zero.
Virtual-boundary nondecay is an existence statement over the virtual matrices \(X,Y\), for a fixed twist \(u\); no claim is made for any particular boundary choice. Definition 12.3.6 records the physical-endpoint string-order notion from the source, which quantifies existentially over \(u,x,y\) and requires a positive limit rather than a lower bound uniform in the length. That paper also notes that the correlator for a particular endpoint choice can vanish even when the physical symmetry is present.
A Hayashi Markov decomposition of a tripartite state \(\rho _{ABC}\) consists of a finite direct-sum decomposition
together with a unitary change of basis on \(B\), a probability vector \((p_j)_j\), and density matrices \(\rho _{A B_j^L}\) and \(\rho _{B_j^R C}\) such that, in the adapted basis, the state becomes
The terminology follows Hayashi’s presentation of quantum Markov structure [ Hay06 ] ; the block decomposition used by the MPDO argument is the structure theorem of [ HJPW04 ] .
Let \(A\) be Hermitian, with spectral decomposition \(A=U\operatorname{diag}(\lambda _i)U^\dagger \). Its support projection is
An MPO tensor is in normalized BNT-refined horizontal form if its doubled-index MPS tensor is a BNT sector decomposition with an independent gauge on every repeated copy:
Here the \(A_j\) are the distinct minimal representatives, \(r_j{\gt}0\), and every weight \(\mu _{j,q}\) is nonzero, \(|\mu _{j,q}|\leq 1\), and at least one weight has modulus one. The BNT hypotheses include irreducibility, left-canonicality, normalized self-overlap, eventual linear independence of the representative MPV families, and the exclusion of similarity up to phase between distinct representatives. Repeated gauge-equivalent copies are retained over the same representative rather than separated as distinct blocks. The total bond dimension of the displayed direct sum is exactly \(D\). Equivalently, with the block-diagonal matrix \(X=\bigoplus _{j,q}X_{j,q}\),
This is a strengthened representative-grouped form of the canonical decomposition in [ CPGSV16 , Section 2.3 ] . In contrast with Definition 9.6.4, the retained direct sum has the full bond dimension, every copy weight is nonzero and normalized, and gauge-equivalent normal blocks are grouped over a BNT representative with a separate gauge for each copy. It is therefore not the literal CPSV canonical-form hypothesis.
An MPO tensor has a horizontal-canonical-form MPV representation if its doubled-index MPS tensor generates the same positive-length MPV family as a BNT canonical form \(\bigoplus _{j=0}^{g-1}\bigoplus _{q=0}^{r_j-1}\mu _{j,q}A_j\). Its length-\(N\) matrix product vector is
This is the MPV-level decomposition in [ CPGSV16 , Section 2.3, lines 298–301 ] .
Associated to an instrument are the total channel \(\sum _i\Phi _i\), the unnormalized update \(\rho \mapsto \Phi _i(\rho )\) for each outcome \(i\), the outcome probability \(p_i(\rho )=\operatorname{tr}(\Phi _i(\rho ))\), and the normalized posterior state \(\Phi _i(\rho )/p_i(\rho )\) whenever \(p_i(\rho )\neq 0\).
An MPS tensor \(A\) has invariant-projector closure if every orthogonal projection \(P\) satisfying \(PA^i=PA^iP\) for all \(i\) also satisfies \(A^iP=PA^iP\) for all \(i\). This is the projector hypothesis in the sufficient condition for canonical form of [ CPGSV16 , Section 2 ] .
A linear map \(E : M_{D}(\mathbb {C}) \to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) is irreducible if whenever \(P\) is an orthogonal projection satisfying \(E(P M_{D}(\mathbb {C}) P) \subseteq P M_{D}(\mathbb {C}) P\), then \(P = 0\) or \(P = \mathbb {1}\). This is [ Wol12 , Theorem 6.2(1) ] . The definition applies to any linear map; complete positivity is not required.
Let \((A_j)_j\) be a basis of normal tensors. The family is locally orthogonal when, for every pair of distinct components,
This is the mixed-sector condition of [ CPGSV16 , Definition 3.5 ] .
Let \((A_j)_j\) be a basis of normal tensors for \(A\). This auxiliary condition requires virtual-insertion distance independence and \(\mathcal{E}_{j,j'}=0\) for every pair of distinct BNT components. It is not [ CPGSV16 , Definition 3.6 ] , which quantifies over physical observables on all disjoint regions.
A collection of scaling factors \((\mu _k)_{k=1}^r\) and block tensors \((A_k)_{k=1}^r\) satisfies the auxiliary block-family hypotheses if:
each \(A_k\) is injective,
each \(A_k\) satisfies the TP normalization \(\sum _i(A_k^i)^\dagger A_k^i=\mathbb {1}\),
the moduli are non-increasing: \(|\mu _1|\ge |\mu _2|\ge \cdots \ge |\mu _r|\),
all \(\mu _k\neq 0\),
every block bond dimension is positive: \(D_k\ge 1\) for every \(k\),
the self-overlap converges: \(O_{A_kA_k}(N)\to 1\) for each \(k\).
Only this one-sided normalization is assumed; no unital condition is assumed here. Condition (6) is a primitivity hypothesis: for a primitive channel ( [ Wol12 , Theorem 6.7(3) ] ), \(T^n(\rho )\to \rho _\infty \) for every initial state, which forces the self-overlap to converge to \(1\). See also [ Wol12 , Theorem 6.8 ] for the completely-positive characterisation and Chapter 7 for the transfer-operator gap proof.
A linear map \(L : M_{d}(\mathbb {C}) \to M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\) is conditionally completely positive (CCP) if it admits a generator decomposition, i.e. there exist a CP map \(\phi \) and a matrix \(\kappa \) such that \(L(\rho ) = \phi (\rho ) - \kappa \rho - \rho \kappa ^\dagger \). This is condition 1 of [ Wol12 , Proposition 7.2 ] .
The parent Hamiltonian with block length \(L\) on \(N\) sites has commuting local terms if \(h_i h_j=h_j h_i\) for all \(i,j\in \{ 0,\ldots ,N{-}1\} \). This records the translated commutation equation \([\tau _j(P_L),P_L]=0\) from [ CPGSV16 , Definition 3.9 ] ; the same source definition also requires the ground space to be spanned, for \(N{\gt}L\), by the periodic MPS vectors of the BNT components.
Given a \(*\)-subalgebra \(S\subseteq M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), a linear map \(P:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) is a conditional expectation onto \(S\) if it is idempotent and unital, has range contained in \(S\), and satisfies \(P(X)=X\) for every \(X\in S\).
Given an endomorphism \(P_K\) and sets of observables \(\mathcal{O}_A\), \(\mathcal{O}_B\), regions \(A\) and \(B\) are decorrelated w.r.t. \(K\) when \(P_K\circ O_A\circ (\mathbb {1}-P_K)\circ O_B\circ P_K=0\) for all \(O_A\in \mathcal{O}_A\) and \(O_B\in \mathcal{O}_B\).
Let \(\lambda _\alpha {\gt}0\) satisfy \(\sum _\alpha \lambda _\alpha =1\), and set \(\rho =\operatorname{diag}(\lambda _\alpha )\). A normal tensor \(A\) has the square-root fixed-point form when there are an invertible matrix \(X\) and a tensor \(U\) satisfying the unit pair-index isometry
such that
Local fix (square-root diagonal). The display at line 1278 uses the bare diagonal \(\Lambda \), while lines 1281–1283 impose a unit pair-index isometry and line 1300 constructs the reference tensor with coefficients \(\sqrt{\Lambda _\alpha }\). These equations force the repaired form \(A^i=X\sqrt{\rho }\, U^iX^{-1}\) used in this definition. The correction is documented in docs/paper-gaps/cpsv16_rfp_isometry_scope.tex.
Explicitly, the reference tensor is
Thus \(\rho =\operatorname{diag}(\lambda _\alpha )\) is the trace-one diagonal fixed point. This records the \(j=j'\) part of the joint isometry condition [ CPGSV16 , Appendix B, lines 1278, 1281–1283, 1300 ] .
A linear map \(\mathcal S\) between matrix algebras is completely positive in rectangular Kraus form if there are finitely many operators \(A_i:H\to K\) such that
No trace-preservation normalization is imposed.
A linear map \(\mathcal{S}\) between matrix algebras is trace-preserving completely positive if it has a Kraus form \(\mathcal{S}(X)=\sum _i A_iXA_i^\dagger \) with \(\sum _i A_i^\dagger A_i=I\). The Kraus operators may be rectangular, so the input and output dimensions need not agree.
An MPO tensor \(M\) satisfies the local purification RFP condition if it is an LPDO whose purifying tensor \(A\), viewed as a matrix product state tensor on the combined spin–ancilla index, is a pure-state renormalization fixed point. Thus
This local condition is motivated by the purification tensor formula [ CPGSV16 , lines 744–747 ] , but it is a one-site tensor-level condition rather than the global finite-chain definition in Definition 26.5.5.
This auxiliary one-block convention means \(\mathcal{E}_A^2=\mathcal{E}_A\). It is not local orthogonality in the sense of the source, which is the family of mixed-sector equations \(\mathcal{E}_{j,j'}=0\) for distinct BNT components.
The nearest-neighbor commuting condition is the length-\(2\) specialization of the preceding commutation equation. For every \(i,j\in \{ 0,\ldots ,N{-}1\} \), one has \(h_i h_j=h_j h_i\). The source definition [ CPGSV16 , Definition 3.9 ] also requires the corresponding parent Hamiltonian to have \(L=2\) and to have the prescribed ground-space spanning property for \(N{\gt}2\).
This condition records the commutation equation and the zero-energy equation for the nearest-neighbor local terms:
This is the zero-energy part of the condition appearing in [ CPGSV16 , Theorem 3.10(iii) ] : the MPS vector has zero energy for the translated two-site local terms, and those terms commute. The missing source assertion is that the whole parent-Hamiltonian ground space is spanned by the corresponding periodic MPS vectors from the BNT components, as recorded in Definition 14.1.15.
An MPO tensor is a nondegenerate purification renormalization fixed point if it is the local ancillary contraction of a pure-state renormalization fixed point and \(\mathcal T_M=\sum _i M^{ii}\ne 0\). The nonzero condition records the nondegeneracy implicit in the density operators of [ CPGSV16 , lines 744–786 ] and excludes the zero purifying tensor.
Scaling factors \((\mu _k)_{k=1}^r\) and block tensors \((A_k)_{k=1}^r\) satisfy the normal canonical form conditions if:
each \(A_k\) is irreducible,
each \(A_k\) satisfies \(\sum _i(A_k^i)^\dagger A_k^i=\mathbb {1}\),
each \(\mathcal{E}_{A_k}\) is primitive (equivalently, \(\sigma _\partial (\mathcal{E}_{A_k})=\{ 1\} \)),
\(|\mu _1|\ge |\mu _2|\ge \cdots \ge |\mu _r|\),
all \(\mu _k\neq 0\),
all bond dimensions are positive.
Here “normal” is the spectral sense of [ CPGSV16 ] , which by [ SPGWC10 , Proposition 3 ] is equivalent to the eventual block-injectivity formulation of Definition 2.4.4.
A family \((A_j)_j\) of MPS tensors has positive-gap BNT zero correlation length for \(A\) when \((A_j)_j\) is a basis of normal tensors for \(A\) in the sense of Definition 10.1.2, its components are locally orthogonal, and the physical correlations of \(A\) are independent of separation whenever both complementary gaps are positive. Adjacent regions are not included.
For an observable \(O\) on a block of \(L\) physical spins, write
Place two observables \(O_1,O_2\) on nonempty finite blocks of a periodic chain, with positive complementary gap lengths \(n_1,n_2\). The tensor has positive-gap physical correlations independent of distance when the expectation is unchanged upon replacing these gaps by positive \(m_1,m_2\) satisfying \(n_1+n_2=m_1+m_2\):
This positive-gap restriction is the transfer-matrix form of [ CPGSV16 , Definition 3.3 and the correlation formula preceding Theorem 3.8 ] , restricted to positive complementary gaps. It excludes adjacent regions.
A family \((U_j)_j\) satisfies the joint isometry condition when
Each block satisfies the within-block pair-index orthonormality, and the cross-block sums between distinct blocks vanish. This is the isometry condition of [ CPGSV16 , Theorem 3.11 ] , split into its \(j=j'\) and \(j\ne j'\) cases.
An MPO tensor \(M\) is a renormalization fixed point if there exist two trace-preserving completely positive maps \(\mathcal{S}, \mathcal{T}\) on the physical indices such that \(\mathcal{S}[M_2(X)]=M_1(X)\) and \(\mathcal{T}[M_1(X)]=M_2(X)\) for every virtual operator \(X\), where \(M_1(X)_{ij}=\operatorname{tr}(M^{ij}X)\) and \(M_2(X)_{(i_1i_2)(j_1j_2)} =\operatorname{tr}(M^{i_1j_1}M^{i_2j_2}X)\) are the one- and two-site physical operators obtained by closing one or two tensors with \(X\). This condition is distinct from idempotence of the doubled-index transfer map for general mixed states. Its source zero-correlation-length consequence concerns the physical-trace transfer and is proved below. This is [ CPGSV16 , Definition 4.1, line 657 ] . On the open coefficient tensors the two maps have types:
An MPO tensor \(M\) that generates an MPDO and whose positive-length finite-chain operators \(\rho ^{(N)}(M)\) all have nonzero trace (so the normalized states are well-defined) saturates the area law if \(I_L=I_{L+1}\) for all \(1\le L{\lt}\lfloor N/2\rfloor \) and all \(N\); that is, the mutual information is constant, \(I_1=I_2=\cdots =I_{\lfloor N/2\rfloor }\). This is [ CPGSV16 , Definition 4.6, line 811 ] .
For tensors \(A,B\) and a fixed physical representation \(U:G\to \mathrm{GL}_d(\mathbb {C})\), the predicate called same SPT phase asserts the existence of factor systems \(\omega _A,\omega _B:G\times G\to \mathbb {C}^\times \) and projective bond representations \(\rho _A,\rho _B\) such that
exactly, and \(\omega _A\sim \omega _B\). Thus the predicate is equality of virtual factor-system classes. It neither quantifies over Hamiltonian paths nor states physical phase equivalence.
A bipartite matrix \(\rho \) on \(M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\otimes M_{d'}(\mathbb {C})\) is separable when it is a finite sum of Kronecker products of positive semidefinite matrices,
A Kossakowski form consists of \(H=H^\dagger \), a finite family of matrices \(\{ F_k\} _{k=0}^{n-1}\), and a positive semidefinite matrix \(C \in M_{n}(\mathbb {C})\), defining
In Wolf’s formula one takes \(\{ F_k\} \) to be a basis of traceless matrices; here we keep only the algebraic data needed for the conversion to Lindblad form.
The adjoint Kraus map is
When the \(\{ K_i\} \) are the matrices of an MPS tensor \(A\), this is the transfer map of the conjugate-transposed family \(i \mapsto (A^i)^\dagger \).
The Kraus commutant is
It is a \(*\)-subalgebra of \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\).
Given operators \(\{ K_i\} _{i=0}^{d-1}\) with \(K_i \in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), the Kraus map is
A linear map is completely positive (Definition 4.1.4) if and only if it can be written in this form, as in (??).
Let
Write \(\iota _{\mathcal A},\pi _{\mathcal A}\) and \(\iota _{\mathcal B},\pi _{\mathcal B}\) for the corresponding block-diagonal embeddings and diagonal-block compressions. The canonical full-matrix extension of \(T:\mathcal A\to \mathcal B\) is
The map \(T\) is a direct-sum Kraus map when \(\widehat T\) has a Kraus representation.
Let \(A\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be Hermitian with eigenvalues \(\lambda _1\ge \lambda _2\ge \cdots \ge \lambda _D\) listed in decreasing order. For \(0\le k\le D\), set
This is the sum of the \(k\) largest signed eigenvalues. Indices beyond \(D\) contribute zero, so the value stabilizes at \(\operatorname{Re}\operatorname{tr}(A)\) once \(k\) reaches \(D\).
The Ky-Fan \(k\)-norm \(\| A\| _{(k)}\) is by definition the sum of the \(k\) largest singular values of \(A\). It agrees with \(S_k(A)\) exactly when \(A\) is positive semidefinite, where eigenvalues and singular values coincide; for an indefinite Hermitian \(A\) the two differ. For \(A=\operatorname{diag}(1,-2)\), one has \(S_1(A)=1\) but \(\| A\| _{(1)}=2\). The results below concern \(S_k(A)\) for arbitrary Hermitian \(A\), so on the positive-semidefinite cone they are statements about the Ky-Fan norm.
A tensor \(A\) is \(L\)-block injective if
An injective tensor is \(1\)-block injective.
A Lindblad form consists of a Hermitian matrix \(H = H^\dagger \) (the Hamiltonian) and a family of matrices \(\{ L_j\} _{j=0}^{r-1}\) (the Lindblad operators), defining the linear map
where \([A,B] = AB - BA\) and \(\{ A,B\} _+ = AB + BA\). This is [ Wol12 , Equation (7.21) ] .
If a Stinespring matrix \(V:\mathbb {C}^{d_{\mathrm{in}}}\to \mathbb {C}^{d_{\mathrm{out}}}\) acts on the first factor while a finite-dimensional space \(R\) is left unchanged, the corresponding local Stinespring matrix is \(W=V\otimes \mathbb {1}_R\).
The virtual local-covariance predicate holds for \(A,u,\Lambda \) if there exist a unitary matrix \(V\) and a phase \(\mu \) with \(|\mu | = 1\) such that \(V^\dagger \Lambda V = \Lambda \) and, for every physical index \(i\),
The unitary \(V\) intertwines the physical action of \(u\) with a virtual conjugation, and the boundary state \(\Lambda \) is invariant under \(V\).
For each site index \(i\in \{ 0,\ldots ,N{-}1\} \), the translated local term is determined by
For a completely positive, trace-preserving qubit channel \(T' : M_{2}(\mathbb {C}) \to M_{2}(\mathbb {C})\), write \(\widehat{T'}\) for its matrix in the normalized Pauli basis \(\{ \sigma _{0}/\sqrt{2},\sigma _{1}/\sqrt{2}, \sigma _{2}/\sqrt{2},\sigma _{3}/\sqrt{2}\} \). The channel is in diagonal Lorentz normal form when it is unital and every off-diagonal entry of \(\widehat{T'}\) is zero.
For a completely positive, trace-preserving qubit channel \(T' : M_{2}(\mathbb {C}) \to M_{2}(\mathbb {C})\), write \(\widehat{T'}\) in the normalized Pauli basis. The channel is in non-diagonal Lorentz normal form when, for some \(x \in [0,1]\),
Trace preservation supplies the first row of the displayed matrix.
For a completely positive, trace-preserving qubit channel \(T' : M_{2}(\mathbb {C}) \to M_{2}(\mathbb {C})\), write \(\widehat{T'}\) in the normalized Pauli basis. The channel is in singular Lorentz normal form when
equivalently, every input state is mapped to \((1+\sigma _{3})/2\). Trace preservation supplies the first row of the displayed matrix.
An MPO tensor is an LPDO if there exist a Kraus dimension \(d_K\), an inner bond dimension \(D'\), a bond-space identification \(e:\{ 0,\ldots ,D-1\} \simeq \{ 0,\ldots ,D'-1\} \times \{ 0,\ldots ,D'-1\} \) (equivalently, \(D\) and \((D')^2\) have the same cardinality), and matrices \(A^{(i,k)}\in M_{D'}(\mathbb {C})\) such that, for all physical indices \(i,j\),
where \(\otimes \) denotes the Kronecker product, \(\overline{(\cdot )}\) denotes entrywise complex conjugation, and \((\cdot )_{e,e}\) denotes reindexing along \(e\) back to \(\{ 0,\ldots ,D-1\} \). See [ CPGSV16 , Section 4.3 ] . The local contraction is
Set \(d = 2\) (spin-\(\tfrac 12\)) and \(D = 3\). The Majumdar–Ghosh tensor is the family \(\{ A^0, A^1\} \subset M_{3}(\mathbb {C})\) defined by
The three bond levels are the two spin-\(\tfrac 12\) values of an open singlet partner together with the closed inter-dimer link; the relative sign \(-\tfrac 1{\sqrt2}\) is the antisymmetry of the singlet. The equality between the matrix product vectors of these matrices and the even-ring dimer superposition, with normalization and cyclic convention fixed, is a separate verification, not part of this definition.
A linear map \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) maps the positive semidefinite cone onto itself if \(T\) is positive and every positive semidefinite matrix is the image under \(T\) of a positive semidefinite matrix. This is condition (1) of [ Wol12 , Proposition 3.8 ] .
Let
be the tensor of a sector decomposition. Let \(s\) range over a second finite alphabet, and for each representative \(A_j\) let \(C_j^s\) be a matrix on its bond space. The corresponding direct sum with one marked letter is
The marked alphabet need not coincide with the alphabet of the unmarked tensor. This is the algebraic form of the marked matrices in the two diagrams of [ CPGSV16 , Proposition 4.13, lines 1909–1919 ] .
The auxiliary predicates state two matrix-theoretic ingredients used in the rank-one step of [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, Lemma C.5 ] : constant traces of all positive powers and existence of a rank-one factorization \(T=ab^\top \).
The proposed implication from primitivity and constant trace powers to a rank-one factorization is not a valid general theorem. A concrete \(3\times 3\) counterexample appears in the archive. The corrected criterion proved here adds positive semidefiniteness and trace normalization, which provide the diagonalizability needed to turn the trace-power condition into a rank-one factorization.
For every \(d\in \mathbb {N}\), define \(|\Omega \rangle \! \langle \Omega |\) on \(\mathbb {C}^d\otimes \mathbb {C}^d\) using
When \(d\geq 1\), this is the maximally entangled state: a rank-one projector with \((|\Omega \rangle \! \langle \Omega |)_{(i_1,i_2),(j_1,j_2)} = \frac{1}{d}\delta _{i_1 i_2}\delta _{j_1 j_2}\) and \(\operatorname{tr}(|\Omega \rangle \! \langle \Omega |)=1\).
The mixed transfer operator (or cross transfer operator) for two MPS tensors \(A\) and \(B\) of the same bond dimension \(D\) is the linear map \(F_{AB}:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) defined by
For MPS tensors \(A\) of bond dimension \(D_1\) and \(B\) of bond dimension \(D_2\), possibly with \(D_1\neq D_2\), the rectangular mixed transfer operator is the map \(F_{AB}^{\mathrm{rect}}: M_{D_1\times D_2}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D_1\times D_2}(\mathbb {C})\) defined by
For sector weights \(p_k\), let \(I_*=\{ k:p_k\ne 0\} \). The one-site matrices and their spaces on \(I_*\) are
The real trace matrix on this index set is
Only the trace matrix is restricted: the physical direct sum still contains every zero-weight summand.
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.ActiveSector
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.ActiveSectorEntryIndex
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.activeSectorOneSiteMatrixFamily
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.activeSectorSet
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.activeSectorOneSiteSpace
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.activeSectorTraceMatrix
A family of support \(*\)-algebras \(\{ \mathcal{A}_n\} _{n \ge 0}\), one at every blocking size, equipped with blocking maps \(m_n : \mathcal{A}_n \otimes \mathcal{A}_n \to \mathcal{A}_{2n}\) and inclusion maps \(\iota _n : \mathcal{A}_n \to \mathcal{A}_{n+1}\) realized, inside the ambient bond-space matrix algebra, by
For a matrix \(X\) on the spin–ancilla space, the ancillary trace map is
This is the one-site trace over ancillary degrees of freedom appearing in [ CPGSV16 , lines 751 and 761–764 ] .
Let \(M_c^{il}\in M_{D_c}(\mathbb {C})\) be a finite labelled MPO tensor family. A simultaneous block left inverse consists of coefficients \(C_{(c,x,y),(i,l)}\) such that
This is the common block inverse used in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1666–1676 ] and [ BMW\(^{+}\)17 , lines 269–277 ] .
For each blocked size \(n\), fix a basis \(\{ b_i\} _{i \in I_n}\) of \(\mathcal{A}_n\) over a finite index set \(I_n\). The blocked coefficients of \(x \in \mathcal{A}_n\) are the coordinates \((x_i)_{i \in I_n} \in \mathbb {C}^{I_n}\) with
For \(i \in I_n\), the blocked inclusion coefficients are the blocked coefficients \((d_{ij})_{j \in I_{n+1}}\) of \(\iota _n(b_i) \in \mathcal{A}_{n+1}\):
For each positive blocked size \(n\) and multiplication triple \((i,j,k)\), where \(i\) and \(j\) label basis elements of \(\mathcal{A}_n\) and \(k\) labels a basis element of \(\mathcal{A}_{2n}\), a size \(r_{n,i,j,k} \in \mathbb {N}\) and diagonal entries \(\chi _{n,i,j,k,1}, \ldots , \chi _{n,i,j,k,r_{n,i,j,k}} \in \mathbb {C}\), giving the diagonal matrix
Unlike the uniform BNT-label family in [ CPGSV16 , Theorem 4.14(ii) ] , the size and diagonal entries may depend on the blocked length and on the chosen basis indices.
For \(i,j \in I_n\), the blocked multiplication coefficients are the blocked coefficients \((c^{(n)}_{i,j,k})_{k \in I_{2n}}\) of \(m_n(b_i,b_j) \in \mathcal{A}_{2n}\):
Fix a coefficient family \(c^{(L)}_{\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma }\), BNT-label operators \(O_L(M_\alpha )\), and trace scalars \(m_\alpha =\operatorname{tr}(\mu _\alpha )\). They satisfy the BNT algebra clause when there is a length-independent family of positive diagonal matrices \(\chi _{\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma }\) such that, for every \(L{\gt}0\), \(c^{(L)}_{\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma } =\operatorname{tr}(\chi _{\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma }^{L})\), the same-length product law holds,
and the trace scalars satisfy
This is the algebra statement in [ CPGSV16 , Theorem 4.14(ii), labelled IV.13 in the source, lines 972–985 ] , before comparison with a chosen blocked basis.
Choose a vertical canonical decomposition
Separating the two factors of the doubled physical index of \(M_\alpha \) gives an MPO tensor \(\widehat M_\alpha \). Define
The chosen decomposition satisfies the tensor-attached BNT algebra clause when the tensors \(M_\alpha \) form a basis of normal tensors and the BNT algebra clause holds for precisely these operators and these trace scalars. This is the data in [ CPGSV16 , Theorem 4.14(ii), lines 972–993, and Appendix C.4, lines 2046–2064 ] ; it does not include a comparison with a two-site vertical canonical decomposition.
A comparison between the BNT-label coefficients and the chosen blocked-basis coefficients consists of a BNT-label assignment together with the equality
This is a blocked-basis comparison: the left hand side is expanded in the chosen basis of \(\mathcal A_{2n}\), so the statement is not itself the same-length BNT product law.
The BNT-label assignment consists, for every positive blocked length \(n\), of a source label map \(\sigma _n\) from the chosen basis of \(\mathcal A_n\) and a target label map \(\tau _n\) from the chosen basis of \(\mathcal A_{2n}\) to the fixed BNT labels. It also gives the combined label map \(\sigma _n \sqcup \tau _n\) on the disjoint union of these two blocked bases.
Suppose that every entry of the one-site multiplicity matrices, every entry of the two-site multiplicity matrices, and every entry of the matrices \(\chi _{\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma }\) is positive. Suppose also that \(\sum _i\mu _{\alpha ,i}=m_\alpha \) for every \(\alpha \). If, for every \(\gamma \) and all sufficiently large \(L\),
then the entries on the two sides agree as multisets. Together with the one-site trace identity \(\sum _i\mu _{\alpha ,i}=m_\alpha \), the one-site and two-site multiplicity entries and their dimensions define a BNT multiplicity-spectrum comparison.
Positivity makes all entries nonzero. Eventual equality of two finite sums of geometric sequences gives, for every \(L\geq 1\),
The finite power-sum identity determines both the cardinality and the multiset of entries.
Suppose the fusion-isometry identity holds with positive diagonal matrices \(\chi _{\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma }\), and suppose the trace scalars satisfy the length-one idempotent law for the corresponding trace-power coefficients. For \(L{\gt}0\), the resulting BNT algebra clause has coefficients \(c^{(L)}_{\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma } =\operatorname{tr}(\chi _{\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma }^{L})\) and records positivity of every diagonal entry. The product law and the assumed idempotent condition are, respectively,
This construction realizes implication (iii)\(\Rightarrow \)(ii) of [ CPGSV16 , Theorem 4.14 ] ; it does not assert either of the implications involving the renormalization fixed-point condition.
An active-support fusion coisometry family consists of the same labelled tensors and positive diagonal matrices, together with maps \(U_{\alpha ,\beta }\) satisfying \(U_{\alpha ,\beta }U_{\alpha ,\beta }^\dagger =1\), the forward fusion identity
and exact reconstruction
Zero-dimensional retained sums are permitted. If in addition \(U_{\alpha ,\beta }^\dagger U_{\alpha ,\beta }=1\) for every pair, this family gives the preceding full-support fusion-isometry family.
Local fix (Figure-11 fusion coisometry): The source uses the retained-row orientation of Proposition 4.13. Thus its fusion maps are coisometries onto the active sectors; exact reconstruction records the discarded common zero corner. This convention is documented in docs/paper-gaps/cpsv16_figure11_fusion_coisometry.tex.
A fusion-isometry family over a finite set of labels consists of a family of tensors \(M_\gamma \) with a common physical dimension and per-label bond dimensions, diagonal matrices \(\chi _{\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma }\) with positive entries, and isometries \(U_{\alpha ,\beta }\) such that, site by site,
This is the isometry statement of [ CPGSV16 , Theorem 4.14(iii) ] ; the tensors are the vertically read basis of normal tensors of [ CPGSV16 , Proposition 4.13 ] , so the physical dimension is the bond dimension of the original tensor. Statement (iii) of the source theorem additionally asserts the idempotent identity for the trace scalars of the vertical decomposition, recorded separately by Definition 27.2.2.5.
Scope restriction (full-support fusion family): The displayed family assumes \(U_{\alpha ,\beta }^\dagger U_{\alpha ,\beta }=1\) on the whole product bond space. The unrestricted source statement permits a common zero corner and instead gives a coisometry onto the active direct sum, together with exact reconstruction. This distinction is documented in docs/paper-gaps/cpsv16_figure11_fusion_coisometry.tex.
The tensors of a fusion-isometry family generate the concrete BNT-label operator family \(O_L(M_\gamma )\), and the positive diagonal matrices give the positive trace-power witness for the coefficient family \(c^{(L)}_{\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma } = \operatorname{tr}(\chi _{\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma }^{L})\).
Choose a vertical canonical decomposition
The fusion clause for this decomposition consists of positive diagonal matrices \(\chi _{\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma }\) and coisometries \(U_{\alpha ,\beta }\) onto the active product sectors, satisfying
They obey \(U_{\alpha ,\beta }U_{\alpha ,\beta }^\dagger =1\), and the active direct sum reconstructs the product tensor:
The trace scalars \(m_\alpha =\operatorname{tr}(\mu _\alpha )\) satisfy the length-one idempotent identity for the coefficients determined by these same diagonal matrices. This is statement (iii) of [ CPGSV16 , Theorem 4.14, lines 986–993 ] , attached to the chosen decomposition of [ CPGSV16 , Proposition 4.13, lines 943–951 ] .
The same-length coefficient system \(c^{(L)}_{\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma }\) from [ CPGSV16 , Theorem 4.14(ii) ] , indexed by fixed BNT labels \(\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma \). The coefficient is attached to the length-\(L\) product \(O_L(M_\alpha )O_L(M_\beta )\), not to the blocked-basis multiplication \(\mathcal A_n\times \mathcal A_n\to \mathcal A_{2n}\). A diagonal \(\chi \)-family canonically determines the coefficient family \(c^{(L)}_{\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma } = \operatorname{tr}(\chi _{\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma }^{L}) = \sum _r\chi _{\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma ,r}^{\, L}\), as in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.4 ] .
A BNT-label trace-scalar family and a BNT-label coefficient system have idempotent coefficient form when, for every BNT label \(\gamma \),
This is the idempotent condition in [ CPGSV16 , Theorem 4.14(ii) ] , stated separately from the trace-power formula.
A BNT-label coefficient system \(c^{(L)}_{\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma }\) is length independent when \(c^{(L)}_{\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma } = c^{(1)}_{\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma }\) for every positive chain length \(L\) and all labels; equivalently, the coefficients agree at any two positive lengths. This is the case singled out in the discussion following [ CPGSV16 , Theorem 4.14 ] .
A BNT-label operator family is linearly independent at length \(L\) when the operators \(O_L(M_\alpha )\) are linearly independent, and eventually linearly independent when this holds for every length beyond some threshold. Eventual linear independence is the operator-level form of the third defining property of a basis of normal tensors in [ CPGSV16 , Section 2.3 ] , invoked for the labelled operators in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.4 ] .
A BNT-label operator family records, for each chain length \(L\), the operators \(O_L(M_\alpha )\) indexed by the fixed BNT labels \(\alpha \). The ambient algebra may depend on \(L\) and is not identified with a chosen blocked support algebra. Write \(\widehat M_\alpha ^{ab}=M_\alpha ^{(a,b)}\) for the vertical reading. The vertical indices of the \(L\) copies are contracted cyclically, while the horizontal legs remain open, as in [ CPGSV16 , lines 962–967 ] :
A BNT-label coefficient system and a diagonal \(\chi \)-family are compatible when, for every positive length \(L\),
The same matrix \(\chi _{\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma }\) is used for all positive \(L\).
A BNT-label operator family and a BNT-label coefficient system have same-length product form when, for every positive length \(L\),
This is the product identity appearing in [ CPGSV16 , Theorem 4.14(ii) ] , stated independently of the blocked-basis multiplication \(\mathcal A_n\times \mathcal A_n\to \mathcal A_{2n}\).
The BNT-label theorem data consist of a BNT algebra clause together with the comparison with the chosen blocked bases. Explicitly, for every \(L{\gt}0\) the product law is
while the idempotent scalar law is
For every positive blocked length \(n\) and blocked-basis indices \(i,j,k\), the source and target label maps \(\sigma _n,\tau _n\) give the comparison
They also determine the pulled-back blocked-basis \(\chi \)-family. These data are the source-side hypotheses from which the blocked-basis consequences below are derived. In the source-side special case where the coefficient family is canonically determined by the same \(\chi \)-family, theorem data are built from that \(\chi \)-family, its positivity, and the product, idempotent, and blocked-comparison statements for the resulting canonical coefficients. The same product and idempotent predicates may also be rephrased using the canonical coefficient family determined by the \(\chi \)-matrices carried by the data, with the corresponding displayed equations.
- MPOTensor.BNTLabelTheoremData
- MPOTensor.BNTLabelTheoremData.same_length_product_form
- MPOTensor.BNTLabelTheoremData.idempotent_coefficient_form
- MPOTensor.BNTLabelTheoremData.positiveChi
- MPOTensor.BNTLabelTheoremData.same_length_product_form_ofChi
- MPOTensor.BNTLabelTheoremData.idempotent_coefficient_form_ofChi
- MPOTensor.BNTLabelTheoremData.same_length_product_eq_sum_ofChi
- MPOTensor.BNTLabelTheoremData.idempotent_eq_sum_ofChi
- MPOTensor.BNTLabelTheoremData.positive_chi_pos_entries
- MPOTensor.BNTLabelTheoremData.positive_chi_trace_power
- MPOTensor.BNTLabelTheoremData.labelAssignment
- MPOTensor.BNTLabelTheoremData.sourceLabel
- MPOTensor.BNTLabelTheoremData.targetLabel
- MPOTensor.BNTLabelTheoremData.positiveBlockedChi
- MPOTensor.BNTLabelTheoremData.ofChi
- MPOTensor.BNTLabelTheoremData.same_length_product_eq_sum
- MPOTensor.BNTLabelTheoremData.idempotent_eq_sum
- MPOTensor.BNTLabelTheoremData.blocked_coeff_eq
- MPOTensor.BNTLabelTheoremData.blockedComparison_ofChi
- MPOTensor.BNTLabelTheoremData.blocked_coeff_eq_ofChi
An existential BNT-label theorem witness consists of the finite BNT-label type, the same-length operator spaces, their algebraic structure, and the corresponding BNT-label theorem data, including the pulled-back blocked-basis \(\chi \)-family. The construction of such a witness from an MPDO tensor is the outstanding step toward [ CPGSV16 , Theorem 4.14(ii) ] . The proposition-level form is the nonemptiness of this witness type. In the source-side special case where the coefficients are canonically determined by a \(\chi \)-family, the witness is obtained from that same \(\chi \)-family together with the remaining product, idempotent, and blocked-comparison statements. For any such witness, the product and idempotent predicates can be rephrased with the canonical coefficient family determined by its \(\chi \)-matrices, with the corresponding displayed equations.
- MPOTensor.BNTLabelTheoremWitness
- MPOTensor.HasBNTLabelTheoremWitness
- MPOTensor.BNTLabelTheoremWitness.toTheoremData
- MPOTensor.BNTLabelTheoremWitness.coeffs
- MPOTensor.BNTLabelTheoremWitness.operators
- MPOTensor.BNTLabelTheoremWitness.traceScalars
- MPOTensor.BNTLabelTheoremWitness.positiveChi
- MPOTensor.BNTLabelTheoremWitness.blockedComparison
- MPOTensor.BNTLabelTheoremWitness.same_length_product_form
- MPOTensor.BNTLabelTheoremWitness.idempotent_coefficient_form
- MPOTensor.BNTLabelTheoremWitness.same_length_product_form_ofChi
- MPOTensor.BNTLabelTheoremWitness.idempotent_coefficient_form_ofChi
- MPOTensor.BNTLabelTheoremWitness.same_length_product_eq_sum_ofChi
- MPOTensor.BNTLabelTheoremWitness.idempotent_eq_sum_ofChi
- MPOTensor.BNTLabelTheoremWitness.positive_chi_pos_entries
- MPOTensor.BNTLabelTheoremWitness.positive_chi_trace_power
- MPOTensor.BNTLabelTheoremWitness.labelAssignment
- MPOTensor.BNTLabelTheoremWitness.sourceLabel
- MPOTensor.BNTLabelTheoremWitness.targetLabel
- MPOTensor.BNTLabelTheoremWitness.positiveBlockedChi
- MPOTensor.BNTLabelTheoremWitness.ofChi
- MPOTensor.BNTLabelTheoremWitness.blocked_coeff_eq
- MPOTensor.BNTLabelTheoremWitness.blockedComparison_ofChi
- MPOTensor.BNTLabelTheoremWitness.blocked_coeff_eq_ofChi
- MPOTensor.BNTLabelTheoremWitness.hasBNTLabelTheoremWitness
- MPOTensor.BNTLabelTheoremWitness.ofChi_hasBNTLabelTheoremWitness
For a normal sector \(s\) and a Markov sector \(k\), let
The assertion \(O_s^{(k)}\ne 0\) means that this block is nonzero for at least one pair of virtual indices \(\beta ,\alpha \).
Let \(C_x\) and \(C_y\) be two rows of a simultaneous left inverse, and choose a Hayashi decomposition of the three-site operator. In its \(k\)-th Markov sector, set
These are the two factors obtained in the projected contraction of [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1719–1725 ] .
Fix the one-site diagonal multiplicity matrices \(\mu _\alpha \) and the two-site diagonal multiplicity matrices \(\nu _\gamma \) in the respective vertical canonical decompositions. A multiplicity-spectrum comparison records \(\operatorname{tr}(\mu _\alpha )=m_\alpha \) and, for every \(\gamma \), equality with multiplicity between the entries of \(\nu _\gamma \) and the products \(\mu _{\alpha ,i}\mu _{\beta ,j}\chi _{\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma ,k}\). This is the conclusion of the vertical BNT comparison and positive power-sum argument in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.4, lines 2048–2058 ] . The definition does not require this comparison to follow from a BNT algebra clause; constructing it from the MPDO tensor is a separate obligation.
Under the hypotheses of Theorem 26.10.2.10, define
This is equation Pis, restricted to the positive-weight Markov support retained here.
The invertible-gauge sub-result for a source-derived two-site multiplicity spectrum additionally records, for every one-site sector \(\gamma \), equality of bond dimensions \(d_\gamma =d_{\sigma (\gamma )}\) and an invertible matrix \(Z_\gamma \in \mathrm{GL}(d_\gamma ,\mathbb {C})\) such that, for every physical index \(i\),
Thus the matched normal tensors have no residual scalar phase. This is the exact invertible conjugacy retained from [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.4, lines 2053–2057 ] . It does not include the further conclusion on line 2057 that \(Z_\gamma \) may be chosen unitary.
For a tensor-attached BNT algebra clause, a source-derived two-site multiplicity spectrum consists of a vertical canonical decomposition
a bijection \(\sigma \) from the one-site sectors to its sectors such that \(M_\gamma \) and \(A_{\sigma (\gamma )}\) generate the same matrix product vectors at every positive length, and, for every \(\gamma \), the multiset equality
This is the decomposition and comparison retained in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.4, lines 2046–2058 ] .
For sector tensors \((l_k)_\beta \) and \((r_k)_\alpha \), close their physical legs and set
This is the pairing operator displayed in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1473–1493 ] .
Tracing the two physical legs of a sector tensor leaves a vector over the virtual bond:
These are the closed tensors of [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1473–1477 ] .
Suppose the weights over each representative do not depend on the copy index. Choose the common weight \(\mu _j\) from any copy over \(j\) and absorb it into the representative:
This is the convention of [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, equation CFK, lines 1660–1665 ] .
Fix a final label \(d\). Summing the diagonal matrix-unit coefficients of the simultaneous block inverse defines
Here \(C_{(d,x,y),(i,j)}\) denotes the coefficient of the simultaneous block inverse corresponding to the matrix unit \(E_{xy}\) in block \(d\).
Fix labels \(a,b,c,d,e\). The five fusion trees in equation (33) of [ BMW\(^{+}\)17 ] determine five multiplicity spaces and five synthesis maps into the fourfold bond space. These spaces use the integer multiplicities \(N_{ab}^{c}\) of the complete zipper family, rather than the weighted positive-diagonal coordinates introduced earlier.
Each edge of the pentagon carries the printed \(F\)-matrix for the affected triple tensor factor and the identity on the untouched multiplicity factor. The three upper edges and the two lower edges define composites in the forward orientation. Replacing each edge by its inverse defines the opposite-oriented composites whose entries occur literally in equation (33).
- MPOTensor.CompleteZipperFusionFamily.FourfoldLeftAssocMultiplicity
- MPOTensor.CompleteZipperFusionFamily.FourfoldLeftInnerMultiplicity
- MPOTensor.CompleteZipperFusionFamily.FourfoldMiddleMultiplicity
- MPOTensor.CompleteZipperFusionFamily.FourfoldPairMultiplicity
- MPOTensor.CompleteZipperFusionFamily.FourfoldRightAssocMultiplicity
- MPOTensor.CompleteZipperFusionFamily.leftAssocFourfoldSynthesis
- MPOTensor.CompleteZipperFusionFamily.leftInnerFourfoldSynthesis
- MPOTensor.CompleteZipperFusionFamily.middleFourfoldSynthesis
- MPOTensor.CompleteZipperFusionFamily.pairFourfoldSynthesis
- MPOTensor.CompleteZipperFusionFamily.rightAssocFourfoldSynthesis
- MPOTensor.CompleteZipperFusionFamily.leftAssocToLeftInnerPrintedFMatrix
- MPOTensor.CompleteZipperFusionFamily.leftInnerToMiddlePrintedFMatrix
- MPOTensor.CompleteZipperFusionFamily.middleToRightAssocPrintedFMatrix
- MPOTensor.CompleteZipperFusionFamily.leftAssocToPairPrintedFMatrix
- MPOTensor.CompleteZipperFusionFamily.pairToRightAssocPrintedFMatrix
- MPOTensor.CompleteZipperFusionFamily.threeEdgePrintedFMatrix
- MPOTensor.CompleteZipperFusionFamily.twoEdgePrintedFMatrix
- MPOTensor.CompleteZipperFusionFamily.leftInnerToLeftAssocInversePrintedFMatrix
- MPOTensor.CompleteZipperFusionFamily.middleToLeftInnerInversePrintedFMatrix
- MPOTensor.CompleteZipperFusionFamily.rightAssocToMiddleInversePrintedFMatrix
- MPOTensor.CompleteZipperFusionFamily.pairToLeftAssocInversePrintedFMatrix
- MPOTensor.CompleteZipperFusionFamily.rightAssocToPairInversePrintedFMatrix
- MPOTensor.CompleteZipperFusionFamily.threeEdgeInversePrintedFMatrix
- MPOTensor.CompleteZipperFusionFamily.twoEdgeInversePrintedFMatrix
Let \(\Lambda \) be a finite set. A complete zipper fusion family consists of positive bond dimensions \(D_a\), MPO blocks \(B_a^{ij}\in M_{D_a}(\mathbb {C})\), fusion multiplicities \(N_{ab}^{c}\), and matrices
The matrices \(X^{c+}_{ab,\mu }\) are independently chosen left inverses, not adjoints. For all labels and multiplicity indices,
The opposite product \(P_{ab}=\sum _{c,\mu }X^c_{ab,\mu }X^{c+}_{ab,\mu }\) is the projector onto the product-MPO support; it need not be the identity on the ambient bond space. Every product-MPO letter is reconstructed on this support:
Writing \(B_{ab}^{ik}=\sum _j B_a^{ij}\otimes B_b^{jk}\), the two zipper identities are
Each block is injective, and the labelled block-letter matrix has a common left inverse: its contraction with \(B_d^{ij}\) is \(\delta _{cd}E_{xy}\) on the block selected by \((c,x,y)\). These are the fusion-tensor, reconstruction, zipper, and simultaneous inverse relations of [ BMW\(^{+}\)17 , lines 161, 181–200, and 269–277 ] .
Fix a BNT label \(s_0\). Each positive-weight Markov sector retains its unique BNT label, while every zero-weight Markov sector is assigned the label \(s_0\). If \(\widehat S_s\) is the set of Markov sectors with completed label \(s\), define
Let \(H=\bigoplus _{k,h}H_{k,h}\). Orthogonally controlling the completed preparations over the sector pairs gives a map
where \((A_{k,h,a})_a\) is a Kraus family for \(\overline{\mathcal S}_{k,h}\) and the tilde denotes its extension by zero outside \(H_{k,h}\). Thus the map discards inter-sector coherences and applies the completed preparation in each diagonal sector. On active sectors this is the sector-control formula for \(\mathcal S_1\) in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1548–1555 ] .
For every sector pair define
On an active pair this is precisely the preparation \(\mathcal S_{k,h}\) of [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1551–1555 ] ; the second branch gives a normalized extension on a pair where the displayed source quotient is undefined.
Orthogonally controlling the completed direct-sum preparations gives
where \((B_{k,h,a})_a\) is a Kraus family for \(\overline{\mathcal T}_{k,h}\). This map discards inter-sector coherences and, on active sectors, is the sector-control formula for \(\mathcal T_1\) in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1523–1535 ] .
For every sector pair define
Thus \(\mathcal H^{\Omega }_{k,h}\) is the carrier space, whereas \(\Omega _{k,h}\), \(\widehat\Omega _{k,h}\), and \(\overline\Omega _{k,h}\) are operators on it: respectively the unnormalized neighboring operator, its normalization on an active pair, and its completed density on an arbitrary pair. On an active pair this is precisely the preparation \(\mathcal T_{k,h}\) of [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1527–1535 ] ; the inactive branch is a normalized extension.
Let \(U\) be a matrix on the physical space. The physical conjugation of \({\cal K}\) by \(U\) is the tensor \(\widetilde{\cal K}\) defined by
Its horizontal bond indices are unchanged. When \(U\) is unitary, this is the corresponding physical basis change.
Let
The controlled dependent partial trace discards the off-diagonal blocks between distinct \(i\) and applies \(\operatorname{tr}_{B_i}\) to the \(i\)th diagonal block.
Let \(H=\bigoplus _k H_k\) and \(K=\bigoplus _k K_k\). For each \(k\), let \((A_{k,a}:H_k\to K_k)_a\) be a finite family of operators, and let \(\widetilde A_{k,a}:H\to K\) agree with \(A_{k,a}\) on \(H_k\) and vanish on every other summand. The orthogonally controlled Kraus map is
In particular, \(\mathcal C(X)_{kl}=0\) for \(k\ne l\). This is the sector control in the definitions of \(\mathcal T_1\) and \(\mathcal S_1\) in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1523–1535 and 1548–1555 ] .
For a physical-sector factorization with neighboring operators \(\eta _{k,h}\), retain a sector \(k\) when there is a sector \(h\) such that \(\eta _{k,h}\ne 0\) and \(h\leadsto k\), where \(\leadsto \) denotes reachability by nonzero neighboring operators. The first edge \(k\to h\) is explicit, so the resulting closed walk has positive length even when the return path is empty. The set \(C\) of retained sectors is therefore exactly the set of vertices occurring in positive-length directed cycles, in the sense of [ Bei12 , Section III ] . Define, for \(k,h\in C\),
For positive semidefinite neighboring operators the trace is real, so \(T_{k,h}=\operatorname{tr}(\eta _{k,h})\), and \(T_{k,h}{\gt}0\) is equivalent to \(\eta _{k,h}\ne 0\).
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.IsCyclicActiveSector
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.cyclicActiveWeight
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.cyclicActiveWeight_ne_zero_iff
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.CyclicActiveSector
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.cyclicActiveSectorTraceMatrix
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.neighboringOperator_trace_re_pos_iff
A scalar weight \(w(i,j;i',j')\) on two consecutive ket–bra pairs determines a translation-invariant matrix-product tensor with virtual dimension \(d^2\). Its incoming virtual pair is constrained to equal the current physical ket–bra pair, while its outgoing pair records the following physical pair.
Let \(N\geq 1\) and let \(k\) be a sector configuration. Define the matrix \(\Omega _k\) on \(I_k\) by
Thus \(\Omega _k=\eta _{k_0,k_1}\otimes \cdots \otimes \eta _{k_{N-1},k_0}\) after the neighboring tensor factors are ordered cyclically.
A family of diagonal complex matrices, indexed by ordered triples \((\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma )\) drawn from a common index type, consisting of a size \(r_{\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma } \in \mathbb {N}\) and diagonal entries \(\chi _{\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma ,1}, \ldots , \chi _{\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma ,r_{\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma }} \in \mathbb {C}\) for each triple, giving the diagonal matrix
This is the matrix \(\chi _{\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma }\) of [ CPGSV16 , Theorem 4.14(ii) ] .
For a doubled-index tensor \(B\) with physical dimension \(d^{2}\), the physical-trace transfer is the bond matrix obtained by closing the ket leg against the bra leg of one tensor:
This is the transfer object of the zero-correlation-length condition of [ CPGSV16 , Definition 4.2, lines 735–739 ] , applied to one element of a basis of normal tensors.
Let \(e:I\simeq J\) be an equivalence of index sets. The associated matrix reindexing is the linear map \(R_e:\mathbb {C}^{I\times I}\to \mathbb {C}^{J\times J}\) determined by
For a cyclic sector assignment \((k_n)_{n\in \mathbb Z/N\mathbb Z}\), the horizontal bond fiber at \(n\) is
Shifting the left component by one site identifies \(\prod _n H_n\) with the vertex-indexed sector fiber used in the cyclic neighboring-operator product.
This defines the one-bond eta-local form constructed in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2 ] : a two-site bond \(B\) as in Definition 26.11.1 together with, for every chain length \(N\ge 2\), a constant \(c{\gt}0\) such that
The bond acts on the full two-site space.
Every Hayashi decomposition witness \(h_\eta \) canonically produces an explicit neighboring \(\eta \)-family by Kronecker-multiplying the sector-reduced states on the neighboring bond spaces:
Positive semidefiniteness of each \(\eta _{k,h}\) follows from the fact that partial traces preserve positivity and that positive semidefiniteness is closed under Kronecker products. This is the sector-reduced extraction; the remaining connection to [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2 ] is the identification of this family with the inverse-map construction in the original simple-MPDO tensor coordinates.
Let \((l_k)_a\) and \((r_k)_a\) be sector tensors indexed by the horizontal virtual index \(a\). For neighboring sectors \(k,h\), define an operator on \(B_k^R\otimes B_h^L\) by
Thus \(\eta _{k,h}=r_k l_h\) is the contraction over the shared horizontal index in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, equation (etarl) ] . Positivity is not part of this definition.
For sectors \(k,h\), define the positive-operator candidate
The summand indexed by \(l\) acts on \((B_k^R\otimes B_l^L)\otimes (B_l^R\otimes B_h^L)\). This is the operator adjoined by \(\mathcal T_{k,h}\) in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1527–1535 ] .
Let \((\eta _{k,h})\) be a positive neighboring-operator family. A rank-one trace factorization consists of real families \((a_k)\) and \((b_h)\) such that
These identities occur in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1395–1402 ] .
The nonzero support graph of a neighboring-operator family has a directed edge \(k\to h\) precisely when \(\eta _{k,h}\ne 0\). Its support is recurrent when every such edge belongs to a directed cycle, equivalently when \(h\) can reach \(k\) whenever \(k\to h\) is an edge.
For a three-site density operator \(\rho _{ABC}\), the local \(\eta \)-structure is the quantum Markov decomposition on the middle subsystem \(B\) produced by equality in strong subadditivity. Concretely, after a unitary change of basis on \(B\), one has a finite direct-sum decomposition
If every neighboring operator \(\eta _{k,h}\) of Definition 26.10.3.1 is positive semidefinite, the family constitutes explicit neighboring \(\eta \)-data. The source obtains the positivity from the projected chain identity: writing \(\tilde\sigma = U^{\dagger \otimes N} \sigma ^{(N)}({\cal K})\, U^{\otimes N}\) for the \(N\)-site operator in the sector basis and \(Q_k\) for the projector onto the \(k\)-th sector of the physical splitting, every cyclic sector assignment \(k_1,\ldots ,k_N\) (with \(k_{N+1}=k_1\)) satisfies
and the sector tensors can be chosen so that each factor is positive semidefinite [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1446–1450 ] . The all-length sector identity is Theorem 26.10.4.18. That algebraic identity does not by itself choose coherent positive representatives for all neighboring pairs, so positive semidefiniteness remains a hypothesis on the chosen representatives here. Theorem 26.10.4.39 provides the diagonal and paired positivity, and Theorem 26.10.4.42 a rescaled positive family under symmetric support.
Fix a Hayashi decomposition witness \(h_\eta \). An explicit neighboring \(\eta \)-family is a dependent family \((\eta _{k,h})\) indexed by sector pairs, where \(\eta _{k,h}\) acts on the neighboring bond space \(B_k^{R} \otimes B_h^{L}\). Requiring positivity for each pair gives the corresponding positive \(\eta \)-data.
Every explicit neighboring \(\eta \)-family determines a sector-by-sector trace matrix. We give both its complex-valued form and the real-part version, which is the direct data for the real Perron–Frobenius matrix \(T\) used in the rank-one step.
For fixed sectors \((k,h)\), define the fiberwise form of \(\mathcal T_0\) by regrouping two sites and tracing \(R_k\otimes L_h\). For fixed \((k,l,h)\), define the fiberwise form of \(\mathcal S_0\) by regrouping three sites and tracing \((R_k\otimes L_l)\otimes (R_l\otimes L_h)\).
On fixed sector pairs, define \(\mathcal S_2\) and \(\mathcal T_2\) by the same inverse regroupings as the corresponding global shifts.
For some common length \(S\), suppose that for each final label \(\varepsilon \) there are coefficients \(c_\varepsilon (w)\), indexed by the words \(w\) of length \(S\) in the doubled physical alphabet, such that
This is the finite-word form of the simultaneous inverse relation \(B_d^+B_{d'}=\delta _{d,d'}1\) used in the fixed-channel argument of [ BMW\(^{+}\)17 ] .
The maps \(U^{\mathrm L}_{\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma ;\varepsilon }\) and \(U^{\mathrm R}_{\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma ;\varepsilon }\) are obtained by restricting the two iterated fusion isometries to the summands with final label \(\varepsilon \). Their adjoints, after the canonical reassociation of the triple bond space, have the orientation and bracketing pattern of the weighted analogs of the two sides in the printed-\(F\) row/column convention of [ BMW\(^{+}\)17 , Section 3.4 ] .
Fix a final label \(\varepsilon \). The multiplicity spaces of the two bracketings are
These spaces have the bracketing pattern of the \((e,\mu ,\nu )\) and \((f,\lambda ,\sigma )\) index spaces in the printed-\(F\) row/column convention of [ BMW\(^{+}\)17 , Section 3.4 ] . Identifying the dimensions of the positive diagonal matrices with the fusion multiplicities of that equation requires the length-independent integer specialization and is not asserted here. The corresponding fixed-final row spaces are \(\mathcal H^{\mathrm L}_{\varepsilon }\otimes \mathbb {C}^{D_\varepsilon }\) and \(\mathcal H^{\mathrm R}_{\varepsilon }\otimes \mathbb {C}^{D_\varepsilon }\).
- MPOTensor.BNTFusionIsometryFamily.LeftFinalMultiplicity
- MPOTensor.BNTFusionIsometryFamily.RightFinalMultiplicity
- MPOTensor.BNTFusionIsometryFamily.leftFinalIndexEquiv
- MPOTensor.BNTFusionIsometryFamily.rightFinalIndexEquiv
- MPOTensor.BNTFusionIsometryFamily.leftTripleFinalEquiv
- MPOTensor.BNTFusionIsometryFamily.rightTripleFinalEquiv
A fixed tensor for a bond-product family consists of a positive virtual dimension and one matrix-product tensor \(C\), independent of \(N\), such that, for every \(N\ge 2\),
If \(d{\gt}0\), a cyclic scalar edge-weight expression for the entries of the product gives such a tensor with positive virtual dimension \(d^2\).
For a virtual matrix \(X\), the four-site physical closure of \(K\) is the operator \(K_4(X)\) whose matrix coefficients are
For a full-support fusion family, let \(P_\gamma \) act on the bond space of \(M_\gamma \). Define
The terminal contraction is the same as in the source operator. The additional condition is that the active support is the whole product bond space.
Scope restriction (full-support fusion family): Full support is not an additional hypothesis of the arbitrary-chain source statement. This distinction is documented in docs/paper-gaps/cpsv16_topological_projector_recursion.tex.
A transfer-map fusion-isometry datum at blocked size \(n\) for an MPO tensor consists of a subspace \(\mathcal{A}_n \subseteq M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) together with linear maps
where \(E_n\) denotes the blocked transfer map.
A rank-one trace factorization of neighboring matrices \(\eta _{q,h}\) consists of real numbers \(a_q,b_h\) such that
The factorization is an explicit assumption; it is not deduced from zero correlation length. It is the factorization invoked at [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, line 1613 ] .
An MPO tensor \(M\) satisfies the global purification equation with a purifying tensor \(A\) if \(\rho ^{(N)}(M)=\rho ^{(N)}_p(A)\) for every positive length \(N\). Equivalently, for every positive length \(N\),
as in [ CPGSV16 , line 751 ] .
Let \(N\) count the sites that are left unchanged. For physical maps \(\mathcal T:M_d\to M_{d^2}\) and \(\mathcal S:M_{d^2}\to M_d\), define
using \(R_1\) and \(R_2\). Thus \(N=0\) leaves no spectator site, but the maps still act on a one-site or two-site operator; no empty ring occurs.
The two- and three-site physical spaces are reindexed by their canonical direct sums over sector pairs and triples, with each summand further regrouped into its boundary and neighboring factors. Write \(\mathfrak G_2\) and \(\mathfrak G_3\) for these reindexings of matrices.
The blocked multiplication coefficients are in trace-power form when, for every positive blocked size \(n\) and every multiplication triple \((i,j,k)\), the coefficient \(c^{(n)}_{i,j,k}\) equals \(\sum _r \chi _{n,i,j,k,r}^{\, n}\). Equivalently, by Lemma 27.2.2.19, it is the trace of the \(n\)-th power of the corresponding diagonal matrix. The exponent \(n\) is the source blocking length of the two factors in \(\mathcal{A}_n\); the product is expanded in the basis of \(\mathcal{A}_{2n}\).
A binary compatibility predicate between an abstract structure-coefficient family \(c^{(L)}_{\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma }\) and a diagonal \(\chi \) family: the pair \((c, \chi )\) is said to be in trace-power form when
for every \(L \ge 0\) and every triple \((\alpha , \beta , \gamma )\), where \(r_{\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma }\) is the size of \(\chi _{\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma }\). This is the formal analog of the target identity of [ CPGSV16 , Theorem 4.14(ii) ] ; the existential version—“there exists \(\chi \) for which \((c,\chi )\) has trace-power form”—is obtained by quantifying over \(\chi \).
This condition asks, for every chain length \(N\geq 2\), for one positive bond on the full two-site space and one positive normalization such that
This auxiliary condition contains no explicit sector labels or multiplicities.
An MPO tensor \(M\) has the single-bond commuting-form property if for every \(N \ge 2\) there is a two-site operator \(B\) as in Definition 26.8.2 and a constant \(c{\gt}0\) such that
The bond in this chainwise condition may depend on \(N\). It is therefore weaker than the single translation-invariant bond family used in the proposition at [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1597–1619 ] .
The spin reduction obtained by tracing the ancillary index is trace-preserving completely positive: the ancillary trace map \(\operatorname{tr}_a\) satisfies Definition 26.1.6. This is the structure described immediately after Definition 4.3 in [ CPGSV16 , lines 761–764 ] .
Fix virtual indices \(\beta ,\alpha \) and set \(\kappa _{\beta ,\alpha }(i,j)=\mathcal K^{ij}_{\beta ,\alpha }\). For a Hayashi sector \(k\), define the two inverse factors
These are the two factors in the sectorwise inverse-map calculation of [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1407–1428 ] .
Let \(B=\bigoplus _k(b_1^{(k)}\otimes b_2^{(k)})\) be the middle-site decomposition, and let \(E_k\) be the coordinate projection onto its \(k\)-th summand. In the original physical basis, define \(Q_k=U_B^*E_kU_B\). These are the projectors introduced in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1364–1368 ] ; the unitary implements the basis change described in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1437–1440 ] .
For a linear map \(\Psi _B\) and a bipartite matrix \(\rho _{AB}\), define
where \(\Sigma \) denotes the canonical exchange of the two tensor factors.
A simple MPO tensor \(K\) is called injective if its doubled-index MPS tensor is injective. For such a tensor, the chosen decomposition map of the doubled-index MPS furnishes a concrete inverse tensor \(K^{-1}\) together with right- and left-physical realization maps that turn virtual bond insertions back into local physical operators.
Let \(\mathcal{K}\) be injective, let \(\rho \) be its three-site closure against a virtual tail \(R\), and choose a Hayashi decomposition of \(\rho \). Fix outer indices such that \(R_{\beta _3,\alpha _1}\ne 0\). The inverse-map tensors \(l_k,r_k\), together with the Hayashi physical decomposition and unitary, determine a physical-sector factorization of \(\mathcal{K}\).
The left and right factor spaces are nonzero because the corresponding Hayashi density matrices have trace one; their nonzero dimensions are conclusions rather than hypotheses. No positivity of the neighboring operators is asserted. This gives the factorization in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, equations AppUkU=rl and formK, lines 1383–1387 and 1434–1439 ] .
Let \(\mathcal K\) be an injective simple MPO tensor, and let \(R\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be the virtual contraction of the sites following a three-site word. For virtual indices \(\alpha _1,\beta _1,\alpha _3,\beta _3\), define
This is the contraction used in the proof of [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1415–1438 ] .
An MPO tensor satisfies the bare global purification RFP predicate if it has a positive-length global purification RFP witness. Equivalently, it admits a purifying tensor \(A\) such that, for every positive length \(N\),
and \(\widehat A\) is a pure-state renormalization fixed point. These are the displayed conditions of Definition 4.3 in [ CPGSV16 , lines 756–764 ] ; the nondegenerate tensor-level predicate is Definition 26.5.13.
For labels \(\alpha , \beta , \gamma \), the left iterated fusion isometry \(U^{\mathrm L}_{\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma }\) is obtained by applying \(U_{\alpha ,\beta }\) (tensored with the identity on the bond space of \(M_\gamma \)) to fuse the first two tensors, then applying \(U_{\delta ,\gamma }\), for each label \(\delta \) appearing in the resulting direct sum, to fuse the outcome with the third tensor. Its codomain is indexed by pairs of labels \((\delta , \varepsilon )\) together with the multiplicity indices of \(\chi _{\alpha ,\beta ,\delta }\) and \(\chi _{\delta ,\gamma ,\varepsilon }\).
Reassociating four right-associated sites as \((123)4\), applying \(\widehat{\mathcal S}\otimes \operatorname{id}\) to the first three, and reassociating the result back to \(1(23)\) defines the localized coarse-graining channel \(\widehat{\mathcal S}_{(123)4}:M_{q^4}(\mathbb {C})\longrightarrow M_{q^3}(\mathbb {C})\) on right-associated physical coordinates.
Reassociating three right-associated sites as \((12)3\), applying \(\widehat{\mathcal T}\otimes \operatorname{id}\) to the first two, and reassociating the result back to \(1(2(34))\) defines the localized refinement channel \(\widehat{\mathcal T}_{(12)3}:M_{q^3}(\mathbb {C})\longrightarrow M_{q^4}(\mathbb {C})\) on right-associated physical coordinates.
For sectors \(k,h\), contract the common virtual index of the right and left sector tensors:
This is an operator on \(B_k^R\otimes B_h^L\). Positivity is not part of this definition; it is a separate hypothesis in Proposition C.7.
Suppose that every neighboring operator is positive semidefinite and that there are real numbers \(a_k,b_h\) such that
These are precisely the remaining hypotheses used in the construction of Proposition C.7 after the physical-sector factorization has been fixed [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1389–1403 ] .
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.weight_nonneg
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.neighboringOperator_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.neighborIndex_nonempty_of_mul_ne_zero
Say that displaced projectors of \(M\) never commute if every orthogonal projector \(Q\) on the physical space with \(Q\widetilde M\ne Q\widetilde MQ\) satisfies \(Q_1H^{(N)}\ne H^{(N)}Q_1\) at every length. This is the canonical-form step of the periodic-sector argument: the proof of [ CPGSV16 , Proposition 4.13 ] assumes the tensor is in canonical form in the horizontal direction, and the argument of lines 1874–1887 turns all-length commutation of \(Q_1\) with \(H^{(N)}\) into the letter-level invariance \(Q\widetilde M=Q\widetilde MQ\). This argument uses the normalized BNT-refined horizontal hypothesis. The all-length condition is stronger than is needed for either Theorem 23.4.47 or Theorem 23.4.48; each uses a single noncommuting length supplied by the contrapositive of Lemma L.
With the convention \(0^{-1}=0\), define for every pair \((k,h)\)
These operators are normalized when the pair is active, namely when \(a_kb_h\ne 0\).
Let \(\mathcal K\) be an MPO tensor and set \(Z_4=\operatorname{tr}[\rho ^{(4)}(\mathcal K)]\). Its normalized fourth-site virtual tail is
Thus the contraction of the fourth ket and bra indices is incorporated into the virtual closing matrix. This is the \(N=4\) specialization of the normalization convention and three-site marginal in [ CPGSV16 , lines 792–793 and 1343–1348 ] .
Let the vertical sectors be labelled by \(\alpha \), with simple matrix algebra \(M_{d_\alpha }\) and positive diagonal multiplicity matrix
Write \(m_\alpha =\operatorname{tr}(\mu _\alpha )\). The normalized embedding and the left partial trace are
On a weighted sector, \(\widetilde R_\mu (\lambda _\alpha \mu _\alpha \otimes X_\alpha ) =\lambda _\alpha m_\alpha X_\alpha \). Thus the partial trace is the canonical extension to the full block matrix space of the inverse map displayed in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.4, lines 1957–1971 ] .
For a sector \(k\) and physical matrix indices \(x,y\) in its summand, let \(A_{k;x,y}\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be the corresponding entry of the sector-coordinate tensor. For a set \(S\) of sectors, define
These are the matrix spaces associated with the physical projections in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1463–1467 ] .
The product tensor of two MPO tensors contracts the bra index of the first factor with the ket index of the second and takes the tensor product of the bond spaces:
In the vertical reading of [ CPGSV16 , Section 4.5 ] this is the tensor obtained by joining two vertically read tensors along the original horizontal bond, the tensor written \(M_\alpha M_\beta \) in [ CPGSV16 , Theorem 4.14(iii) ] .
For three bond spaces, let
be the coordinate pullback induced by canonical reassociation, defined on elementary tensors by \(A_{D_1,D_2,D_3}(x_1\otimes (x_2\otimes x_3)) =(x_1\otimes x_2)\otimes x_3\).
An original-label corner family for the retained product records, for every active corner of each copy pair, an original one-site BNT label, a positive coefficient, and an isometric inclusion into the raw product bond space. Distinct corners belonging to one copy pair have orthogonal ranges. Each inclusion intertwines the raw product tensor with the stated positive multiple of its original BNT representative, and the resulting corners reconstruct every tensor letter exactly.
Local fix (Figure-11 fixed-pair support): A copy pair with no active corner is represented by an empty family; no unsupported corner is inserted. See docs/paper-gaps/cpsv16_figure11_per_pair_support.tex.
Let \(\{ K_x\} _{x=0}^{g-1}\) be MPO tensors on a common one-site space. An orthogonally supported family of commuting sector products consists of pairwise orthogonal one-site projections \(P_x\) and positive two-site operators \(B^{(x)}\) such that
and, for every \(N\geq 2\),
Together with natural multiplicities \(n_x\), these objects determine the corresponding finite-chain sector decomposition in Definition 26.8.1.
Let \(M\) be an MPO tensor. A periodic-sector projector for \(M\) with exponent \(p\ge 1\) is an orthogonal projector \(Q\) on the physical space such that for every \(N\ge 0\), with \(Q_1=Q\otimes \mathbb {1}^{\otimes N}\) acting on the first site,
These are the commutation identities that the proof of [ CPGSV16 , Proposition 4.13 ] , lines 1889–1891, attaches to a nontrivial vertical period; the second family is the displayed identity at lines 1890–1891.
Let \(M\) generate matrix product density operators, let \(p\ge 1\), and let \(Q\) be an orthogonal projector on the physical space satisfying \(QA_w=QA_wQ\) for every product \(A_w\) of \(p\) letters of \(\widetilde M\) and \(Q_1H^{(N)}\ne H^{(N)}Q_1\) for every length. Then \(Q\) is a periodic-sector projector for \(M\) with exponent \(p\).
Say that periodic vectors of \(M\) supply cyclic projectors if for every nontrivial \(p\)-periodic vector of the vertically viewed tensor \(\widetilde M\) — presented as in Definition 9.7.3 — there are an exponent \(q\ge 1\) and an orthogonal projector \(Q\) on the physical space satisfying the one-sided invariance \(QA_w=QA_wQ\) for every product \(A_w\) of \(q\) letters of \(\widetilde M\), together with \(Q_1H^{(N)}\ne H^{(N)}Q_1\) for every length. This is the shape of the cyclic decomposition of the peripheral spectrum [ Wol12 , Theorem 6.6 ] applied to the vertical transfer map: each cyclic projection of a period-\(p\) sector returns to itself after \(p\) applications of the map, while its nontrivial cyclic displacement under one application prevents commutation with \(H^{(N)}\). Compared with Definition 23.4.37, the commutation of \(Q\) with \([H^{(N)}]^p\) is no longer assumed; it is derived through the stacked-layers identity.
Say that periodic vectors of \(M\) supply projectors if for every nontrivial \(p\)-periodic vector of the vertically viewed tensor \(\widetilde M\) — an irreducible restriction \(B\) of \(\widetilde M\) to a minimal invariant subspace whose transfer map has a peripheral eigenvalue different from its spectral radius, as in Definition 9.7.3 — there is an exponent \(q\ge 1\) for which \(M\) admits a periodic-sector projector. The proof of [ CPGSV16 , Proposition 4.13 ] , lines 1889–1891, asserts this implication from the general theory of the peripheral spectrum of completely positive maps, with \(q\) equal to the period \(p\) of the vector; only the existence of some exponent enters the exclusion argument. The projector, its word invariance, and its single-letter displacement are constructed from the cyclic decomposition of the peripheral spectrum (Theorem 23.4.45); the passage from the displacement to the all-length non-commutation family is not needed for the periodic-sector contradiction below.
Define
Here the first application acts on the first three sites and leaves the fourth site unchanged. The superscript again denotes successive overlapping applications.
Let \(N\geq 1\). For a cyclic sector configuration \(k=(k_0,\ldots ,k_{N-1})\), write
Applying the one-site sector decomposition at every site gives a bijection
On \(I_k\), define the cyclic neighboring product by
where site labels are read modulo \(N\).
The coordinate equivalences used by the coarse-graining channel expose the direct sums over site-sector pairs and triples. Write \(\mathfrak R_2\) and \(\mathfrak R_3\) for the corresponding matrix reindexings. Their inverses send every sector block to the corresponding physical matrix entries. These reindexings preserve the left-right order within every physical site. They differ from the regrouped coordinates \(\mathfrak G_2\) and \(\mathfrak G_3\) of Definition 26.10.3.27, which place the two outer subspins before the neighboring subspins. If \(R_{\Phi _2}\) and \(R_{\Phi _3}\) denote the two regrouping maps, then
A physical-sector factorization of an MPO tensor \(\mathcal{K}\) consists of a finite decomposition
whose left and right factors are nonzero, an isometry \(U\) on the physical space, and matrix families \((l_k)_\beta \) and \((r_k)_\alpha \) such that every physical slice satisfies
No positivity, trace factorization, or quantum-Markov decomposition is included in this datum. This is the factorization displayed in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1381–1388 ] .
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.transformedPhysicalSlice
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.transformedPhysicalSlice_eq
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.sectorFinEquiv
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.sectorCoordinateTensor
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.neighborIndex_nonempty
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.sectorCoordinateTensor_apply
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.sectorCoordinateTensor_apply_same
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.sectorCoordinateTensor_apply_ne
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.transformedPhysicalSlice_apply_same
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.transformedPhysicalSlice_apply_ne
Let \(S\) be a set of active sectors in a physical-sector factorization, and suppose that \((l_k)_\beta =0\) for every \(k\notin S\) and every \(\beta \). Retain every physical summand and define
Then \(\widehat l_k\otimes \widehat r_k=l_k\otimes r_k\) for every \(k\), so the physical-slice factorization is unchanged. The neighboring operators become
This is the reparameterization freedom in the factorization and neighboring contraction of [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1434–1445 ] .
Let \(z_k\in \mathbb {C}\) satisfy \(|z_k|=1\) for every sector. Replacing
leaves every physical-slice factorization unchanged.
On a sector pair with \(a_kb_h\ne 0\), let \(\mathcal S_{k,h}(X)=X\otimes \frac{\eta _{k,h}}{a_kb_h}\). If \(a_kb_h=0\), positivity and vanishing trace imply \(\eta _{k,h}=0\); choose any density operator on that unused summand. Taking the orthogonal direct sum over \((k,h)\) defines \(\mathcal S_1\).
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.normalizedNeighboringDensity
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.normalizedNeighboringDensity_pos
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.trace_normalizedNeighboringDensity
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.normalizedNeighboringPreparationMap_isKrausCPTP
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.inactiveNeighboringDensity
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.inactiveNeighboringDensity_posDef
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.inactiveNeighboringDensity_trace
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.completedNeighboringDensity
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.completedNeighboringDensity_pos
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.trace_completedNeighboringDensity
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.completedNeighboringDensity_eq_normalized
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.completedNeighboringPreparationMap
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.completedNeighboringPreparationMap_isKrausCPTP
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.completedNeighboringPreparationMap_eq_normalized
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.completedNeighboringControlledMap
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.completedNeighboringControlledMap_sameBlock_apply
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.completedNeighboringPreparationMap_smul
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.s1Map
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.s1Map_block_eq_kronecker
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.s1Map_apply_of_ne
On a sector pair with \(a_kb_h\ne 0\), set \(\widehat\Omega _{k,h}=(a_kb_h)^{-1}\Omega _{k,h}\). If \(a_kb_h=0\), positivity and vanishing trace imply \(\Omega _{k,h}=0\); choose any density operator on that summand and denote the resulting completed density by \(\overline\Omega _{k,h}\). The sectorwise preparation is \(X\longmapsto X\otimes \overline\Omega _{k,h}\). Taking the orthogonal direct sum over the outer sectors \((k,h)\) gives the preparation stage \(\mathcal T_1\) of [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1523–1535 ] . The zero-weight choice makes the source map total without imposing a nonzero-weight hypothesis.
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.normalizedThreeSiteNeighboringDensity
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.inactiveThreeSiteNeighboringDensity
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.completedThreeSiteNeighboringDensity
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.completedThreeSitePreparationMap
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.completedThreeSiteControlledMap
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.t1Map
Define the channel from two physical sites to three physical sites by \(\mathcal T=\mathcal T_2\mathcal T_1\mathcal T_0\). Thus \(\mathcal T_0\) traces the neighboring subspins, \(\mathcal T_1\) adjoins the completed three-site neighboring density, and \(\mathcal T_2\) restores the three complete physical sectors. This is the refinement map in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1522–1545 ] .
For every outer-sector pair \((k,h)\), define
This is the direct sum of the two neighboring contractions appearing in the three-site closure factorization [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1510–1516 ] .
In the two-site sector coordinates, define
Thus the outer factors carry the identity, while the neighboring factors carry the operator \(\eta _{k,h}\). This is the local bond in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, Proposition C.8, lines 1581–1593 ] .
Let \(P\) be an orthogonal one-site projection and let \(K\) be an MPO tensor fixed by compression with \(P\) on its two physical indices. A physical support restriction consists of a dimension \(e\) and an isometry \(V:\mathbb {C}^e\longrightarrow \mathbb {C}^d\) such that
for which the restricted tensor \(K_P=V^*KV\) is injective and its inclusion into the ambient physical space recovers \(K\) exactly.
Transporting \(\mathcal T\) through the canonical two-site and three-site coordinate identifications gives a channel \(\widehat{\mathcal T}:M_{q^2}(\mathbb {C})\longrightarrow M_{q^3}(\mathbb {C})\), where all multiple physical indices are associated to the right.
Let \(\widehat{\mathcal K}\) be the sector-coordinate tensor selected by the physical isometry of Proposition C.7. Define
Here the second application acts on the first two sites and leaves the third site unchanged. Thus the superscript denotes two successive overlapping applications, as in the proof of [ CPGSV16 , Theorem 4.9, (iv)\(\Rightarrow \)(v) ] .
Let \(V_2\) be the two-site tensor product of the project’s coordinate map, so that \(V_2XV_2^\dagger \) expresses a physical operator \(X\) in sector coordinates. Thus \(V_2=U_{\mathrm{paper}}^\dagger \) in the convention of [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1581–1583 ] . Define
and identify pairs of physical indices with functions \(\{ 0,1\} \to \{ 0,\ldots ,d-1\} \). This is the physical two-site bond in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, Proposition C.8, lines 1581–1593 ] .
A positive blocked \(\chi \) trace-power witness consists of a blocked \(\chi \) family, positivity of all its diagonal entries, and the positive-length trace-power identity for the blocked multiplication coefficients. This is the blocked-basis analog of the positive diagonal matrices in [ CPGSV16 , Theorem 4.14(ii) ] , without requiring a single family indexed only by the BNT labels.
A positive BNT-label \(\chi \) witness consists of a length-independent diagonal \(\chi _{\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma }\)-family, positivity of every diagonal entry, and the positive-length trace-power identity for the BNT-label coefficients. This is the coefficient statement of [ CPGSV16 , Theorem 4.14(ii) ] . If the coefficient family is chosen canonically from the same \(\chi \)-family, positivity of the diagonal entries alone gives such a witness.
For a positive integer \(L\), group \(L\) adjacent physical sites and denote the resulting local tensor by \(M^{[L]}\). It has a length-\(L\) ket word \(I=(i_1,\ldots ,i_L)\) and a length-\(L\) bra word \(J=(j_1,\ldots ,j_L)\) as its physical indices, and
Thus the ket and bra words are grouped separately. This is the MPO version of the physical blocking used for the basis of normal tensors in [ CPGSV16 , lines 317–345 ] . It is a local tensor, not the closed-chain operator \(O_L(M)\) of [ CPGSV16 , lines 962–967 ] .
A vertical-sector family \(X=(X_\alpha )_\alpha \) is positive when every \(X_\alpha \) is positive semidefinite. Its total sector trace is
A purification RFP is viewed together with trace-preserving spin reduction by applying Corollary 26.5.7 to the ancillary trace map appearing in its purification equation. This records the structure obtained after tracing the ancillary indices in [ CPGSV16 , lines 761–764 ] , without adding a separate hypothesis to Definition 4.3.
For a purifying spin–ancilla tensor \(A\), the reduced spin density matrix is defined by
This is the coefficient form of the ancillary trace in [ CPGSV16 , eq. (4.7), line 751 ] .
An MPO tensor \(M\) has a bare global purification RFP witness if it satisfies the global purification equation for some purifying spin–ancilla tensor \(A\), and \(\widehat A\) is a pure-state renormalization fixed point: \(\mathcal{E}_{\widehat A}\circ \mathcal{E}_{\widehat A}=\mathcal{E}_{\widehat A}\). This records the displayed conditions of Definition 4.3 in [ CPGSV16 , lines 756–764 ] . It does not include the nondegeneracy implicit when the subsequent theorem speaks of density operators.
Given matrices \(A^{(i,k)}\) with a spin index \(i\) and an ancillary index \(k\), the associated MPS tensor on the product physical space is \(\widehat A^{(i,k)}=A^{(i,k)}\). This is the tensor whose finite-chain vector appears in the purification formula of [ CPGSV16 , lines 744–751 ] .
Let \(I\) be a finite index set, let \(J\) be an arbitrary index set, and let \((A_a\in \mathbb {C}^{J\times I})_a\) be a finite family of matrices. Its rectangular Kraus map is
A retained-product spectral family records, simultaneously for every ordered pair of retained BNT copies, all nonzero normal corners, their positive spectral coefficients, and their local isometries. Its active labels form the dependent union of the local corner families; this union is enumerated by a single finite type. The local isometries and their inclusions remain part of the data, and their range projections can be formed when needed.
Retain the coordinates \((\alpha ,a,i)\), where \(\alpha \) labels a simple sector, \(a\) labels a diagonal entry of \(\mu _\alpha \), and \(0\leq i{\lt}d_\alpha \). The family \((Y_\alpha )_\alpha \) is represented on this space by \(\bigoplus _\alpha Y_\alpha \). Write \(\iota \) for this inclusion, \(\pi \) for extraction of the diagonal summands, and \(P=\iota \pi \). Composing \(\iota \) and \(\pi \) with \(R_\mu \) and \(\widetilde R_\mu \) defines their retained-coordinate forms.
An MPO tensor \(M\) satisfies the algebra-structure formulation used here when there exist algebra-structure data such that, for every positive blocking size \(n\),
where \(E_n\) is the blocked transfer map. This is a nontrivial algebraic condition, but it is still weaker than the full coefficient formulation of [ CPGSV16 , Theorem 4.14(ii) ] ; that formulation also includes the coefficient family \(c_{\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma }^{(L)}\).
For labels \(\alpha , \beta , \gamma \), the right iterated fusion isometry \(U^{\mathrm R}_{\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma }\) is obtained by applying \(U_{\beta ,\gamma }\), tensored with the identity on the bond space of \(M_\alpha \), and then applying \(U_{\alpha ,\delta }\) for every intermediate label \(\delta \). Its codomain is indexed by the intermediate and final labels \((\delta ,\varepsilon )\) and by the multiplicity indices of \(\chi _{\beta ,\gamma ,\delta }\) and \(\chi _{\alpha ,\delta ,\varepsilon }\). This is the right-bracketed composite in the associativity equation of [ BMW\(^{+}\)17 , Section “Associativity and the pentagon equation” ] , before the change of basis by an \(F\)-matrix.
For a matrix \(X\) on \(A\otimes B\), the right partial trace is the linear map from matrices on \(A\otimes B\) to matrices on \(A\) given by
After the retained and discarded subspins have been regrouped as \(A\otimes B\), this is the partial-trace ingredient of the maps \(\mathcal T_0\) and \(\mathcal S_0\) in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1521–1522 and 1547 ] .
Define \(\mathcal S_0\) by the three-site regrouping followed, for every outer pair \((k,h)\), by the partial trace over
Thus, writing \(R_{\Phi _3}\) for the regrouping reindexing,
The map \(\mathcal S_2\) is matrix reindexing along the inverse two-site equivalence. Thus
For an arbitrary virtual matrix \(X\), define the outer boundary operator on \(B_k^L\otimes B_h^R\) by
The map \(X\mapsto B_{k,h}(X)\) is complex-linear. No positivity of \(X\) or \(B_{k,h}(X)\) is assumed.
For a sector configuration \(k=(k_0,\ldots ,k_{N-1})\), let
Applying the one-site Hayashi decomposition at every site gives a bijection
We write \(\operatorname{reindex}_{\Phi _N}(M)\) for the matrix obtained by transporting both indices of \(M\) along this bijection.
Fix outer virtual indices \(\alpha _1,\beta _3\) with the chosen Hayashi decomposition, and let \(l_k,r_k\) be the sector tensors of Definition 26.10.2.46. For each pair of sectors \((k,h)\), the neighboring operator contracts the right sector tensor of one site with the left sector tensor of the following site over the virtual bond they share:
It acts on the neighboring bond space \(B_k^{R}\otimes B_h^{L}\). This is the operator displayed in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1441–1445 ] .
For a real \(n\times n\) matrix \(T\) and a real vector space \(V\), this structure consists of vectors \(|l_0),\ldots ,|l_{n-1})\in V\) and linear functionals \((r_0|,\ldots ,(r_{n-1}|\) on \(V\) satisfying the pairing identity \(T_{k,h}=(r_k|l_h)\) of [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2 ] together with the zero-correlation-length identity
displayed in the proof of [ CPGSV16 , Lemma C.5 ] . The vectors are the closed sector tensors obtained there from the sector splitting of an injective simple tensor.
A matrix \(P\in M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\) is a sector projector for the weight \(\mu \in \mathbb {C}\) and the matrix \(E_\alpha \in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) if \(P\) is an orthogonal projector and inserting \(P\) into the single-site vertical loop selects the sector contribution, \(E_P=\mu E_\alpha \). In the vertical decomposition
of the vertically viewed tensor, carried by the physical space in the proof of [ CPGSV16 , Proposition 4.13 ] , the projector \(P_{\alpha ,k}\) selecting the sector \((\alpha ,k)\) has this property with \(\mu =\mu _{\alpha ,k}\) and \((E_\alpha )_{ab}=\operatorname{tr}(M_\alpha ^{(a,b)})\), independently of \(k\). Indeed, cyclicity of trace cancels the internal similarity \(X_{\alpha ,k}M_\alpha ^{(a,b)}X_{\alpha ,k}^{-1}\). Applied to the physical isometry of a grouped normal sector, the gauge-corner identity constructs the projector and proves its loop identity.
Fix outer virtual indices \(\alpha _1,\beta _3\) and a Hayashi sector \(k\). The sector tensors are
These are the tensors of the factorization displayed in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1435–1448 ] .
In sector coordinates, let \(A_{k;x,y}\) be the virtual matrix obtained from the \((x,y)\) entry within sector \(k\). The sector-coordinate family contains all transformed physical matrices, while the virtual-matrix family consists of all matrices \(A_{k;x,y}\).
A tensor generating MPDOs is in simple canonical form if it has a basis-of-normal-tensors decomposition whose basis elements all have non-nilpotent physical-trace transfer. This records the simple horizontal-canonical-form data of the already-blocked tensor \(K\) fixed in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, line 1628 ] .
First block a positive number of physical sites and write the blocked doubled-index tensor in canonical form over a basis of normal tensors, as prescribed at line 815 of [ CPGSV16 ] . A tensor generating MPDOs is simple if one such canonical form has no nilpotent basis element [ CPGSV16 , line 822 ] . A basis element is nilpotent when tracing \(R\le D\) sites annihilates its density operators for all large chain lengths [ CPGSV16 , line 819 ] ; this is nilpotency of its physical-trace transfer matrix.
For a one-site matrix \(V\), write \(V^{\otimes N}\) in the configuration basis as
If the copies of the \(j\)-th normal tensor have common coefficient \(\mu _j\), let \(\mathcal K_j=\mu _j A_j\) denote the representative with this coefficient absorbed into its local tensor.
A density operator on a periodic chain is a Gibbs state of a nearest-neighbor commuting Hamiltonian if
where the one-site spaces belonging to distinct labels \(x\) are orthogonal and \([h^{(x)},\tau _1(h^{(x)})]=0\). With the projector-limit convention of [ CPGSV16 , Definition 4.8, lines 829–850 ] , this is equivalently
with commuting neighboring translates. The orthogonal sum and the multiplicities are part of the definition. Definition 4.8 decomposes the global Hilbert space into the uniform product sectors and requires the associated one-site spaces to be mutually orthogonal; it does not impose a resolution of a larger one-site identity by the sector projections.
For \(N=L+K\), split a physical configuration into consecutive intervals of lengths \(L\) and \(K\), flatten each interval to a finite index, and denote the resulting bipartite form of the normalized periodic MPO by \(\sigma ^{(N)}_{L:K}\). The flattened local maps on the two factors are denoted by \(\widehat{\mathcal T}_L\) and \(\widehat{\mathcal S}_K\).
Let \(\rho \) be a matrix on a finite-dimensional space \(B\). The state-preparation map from matrices on \(A\) to matrices on \(A\otimes B\) is
This is the elementary preparation operation used in the maps \(\mathcal T_1\) and \(\mathcal S_1\) of [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1527–1533 and 1551–1555 ] .
Define \(\mathcal T_0\) by the two-site regrouping followed, in each pair \((k,h)\), by the partial trace over \(R_k\otimes L_h\). Its output is indexed by the retained outer factors \(L_k\otimes R_h\). Thus, writing \(R_{\Phi _2}\) for the regrouping reindexing,
The map \(\mathcal T_2\) is matrix reindexing along the inverse three-site equivalence. On each summand it sends
For an MPDO in normalized BNT-refined horizontal form satisfying the renormalization fixed-point condition, fix the fusion clause selected by that construction. For every terminal label \(\gamma \), close the horizontal operator leg of \(M_\gamma \) to obtain a matrix \(K_\gamma \) on its bond space. Its spectral indices are pairs \(s=(\gamma ,k)\) with \(0\leq k{\lt}D_\gamma \). Write \(\lambda _s\) for the corresponding eigenvalue and \(E_s\) for the rank-one spectral projection, extended by zero on terminal labels different from \(\gamma \). Recursively transport this terminal family through every fusion history, then through the adjoint sequential fusion coisometry, and assemble over all sitewise label and multiplicity configurations. Denote the resulting all-label operator at positive chain length \(N\) by \(P_s^{(N)}\).
Scope restriction (BNT-refined horizontal form): the normalized BNT-refined horizontal hypothesis is stronger than the literal CPSV canonical-form hypothesis.
- MPOTensor.BNTFusionTensorClause.terminalMatrix
- MPOTensor.BNTFusionTensorClause.TerminalSpectralIndex
- MPOTensor.BNTFusionTensorClause.terminalEigenvalue
- MPOTensor.BNTFusionTensorClause.terminalEigenProjection
- MPOTensor.BNTFusionTensorClause.terminalEigenProjectionFamily
- MPOTensor.BNTFusionTensorClause.recursiveTerminalEigenProjectorQ
- MPOTensor.BNTFusionTensorClause.topologicalSpectralProjectorSucc
- MPOTensor.BNTFusionTensorClause.HasTerminalSpectralProjectorRefinement
- MPOTensor.rfpBNTFusionTensorClause
Let \(P\in M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\) and write doubled indices as \(p=(a,b)\) and \(q=(c,e)\). The first-site matrices corresponding respectively to \(PH^{(N)}\), \(H^{(N)}P\), and \(PH^{(N)}P\) are
Let \(\mathcal K\) be an MPO tensor and let \(R\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\). A tripartite operator \(\rho \) is the three-site closure of \(\mathcal K\) against \(R\) if
This is the algebraic form of the three-site reduced operator in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1422–1433 ] .
Let \((\mathcal K_s)_s\) be a finite family of MPO tensors, with \(\mathcal K_s^{ij}\in M_{D_s}(\mathbb {C})\), and let \(R_s\in M_{D_s}(\mathbb {C})\). A three-site operator is a family closure when
Given a simultaneous left inverse \(C\) as in Theorem 27.3.74, contracting \(C\) against the first and third physical sites of \(\rho \) defines the outer inverse contraction
The closure is the sector-sum form of the displayed equation for \(\sigma _3^{(N)}\) in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1343–1348 ] , used with the block-canonical tensor in the Case II calculation at [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1726–1732 ] . The outer contraction is the sector-family form of the Case I contraction in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1415–1438 ] ; the same construction is used with sector projectors at lines 1719–1725.
Write the two-site bond on the ordered pair of physical indices, and identify a three-site configuration \((x_0,x_1,x_2)\) with the left-associated triple \(((x_0,x_1),x_2)\). These are common coordinates for the two bonds on sites \((0,1)\) and \((1,2)\).
Let \(B\) be an operator on two copies of a finite-dimensional space \(H\). On the right-associated space \(H\otimes (H\otimes H)\), define
where \(\alpha :(H\otimes H)\otimes H\to H\otimes (H\otimes H)\) is the canonical associator.
First pass to the physical basis selected by \(U\) and form the three-site closure of the resulting sector-coordinate tensor. Restrict this closure to the sectors \((k,l,h)\) and reindex its physical factors by
Denote the resulting matrix by \(\mathcal{K}_{3;k,l,h}(X)\).
Regroup three sites by
Equivalently,
The forward equivalence prepares the four middle subspins for \(\mathcal S_0\); its inverse is the shift \(\mathcal T_2\) in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1535–1540 and 1547 ] .
- MPOTensor.ExplicitEtaOperators.OmegaPreparationIndex
- MPOTensor.ExplicitEtaOperators.threeSiteTraceRegroupEquiv
- MPOTensor.ExplicitEtaOperators.s0RegroupEquiv
- MPOTensor.ExplicitEtaOperators.omegaShiftEquiv
- MPOTensor.ExplicitEtaOperators.t2ShiftEquiv
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.ThreeSiteMiddleIndex
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.S0PreparationIndex
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.s0RegroupEquiv
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.t2ShiftEquiv
For a chain of positive length \(N\), choose at every site a BNT label \(\alpha _j\) and a diagonal coordinate \(q_j\) of \(\mu _{\alpha _j}\). Equivalently, putting \(L=N-1\), the chain has length \(L+1=N\) and contains \(L\) appended labels after the initial site. Define
The first label is the initial label of the recursive fusion, while the remaining labels are appended in the physical order \(\alpha _1,\ldots ,\alpha _{N-1}\). The recursive specification records this sequence in the reverse order \((\alpha _{N-1},\ldots ,\alpha _1)\), so removing its first entry removes the final physical site. This reversal affects only the recursive notation: the tensor product and the sequential fusion coisometry remain in the physical order \(\alpha _0,\ldots ,\alpha _{N-1}\). Let \(W_{N,c}\) be the resulting retained-row sequential coisometry for the configuration \(c\), and set \(Q_{N,c}=Q_N((\operatorname{tr}(M_\gamma ))_\gamma )\). The corresponding density block is \(m(\boldsymbol \alpha ,\boldsymbol q) W_{N,c}^\dagger Q_{N,c}W_{N,c}\). Thus the embedding \(\widetilde U\) in the source formula is \(W_{N,c}^\dagger \). The all-label recursive density operator is the direct sum of these blocks over every sitewise label and diagonal coordinate; denote it by \(R_N\). On the same direct-sum coordinates, define
Its scalar coefficients are precisely the selected diagonal coefficients of the factor \(\mu ^{\otimes N}\) in [ CPGSV16 , line 999 ] ; the identities mentioned there act on the complementary tensor factors of each block.
- MPOTensor.BNTFusionTensorClause.verticalMultiplicityChainWeight
- MPOTensor.BNTFusionTensorClause.verticalCopyChainFusionCoisometry
- MPOTensor.BNTFusionTensorClause.verticalCopyChainProjectorQ
- MPOTensor.BNTFusionTensorClause.topologicalDensityBlock
- MPOTensor.BNTFusionTensorClause.topologicalDensityOperatorSucc
- MPOTensor.BNTFusionTensorClause.topologicalMultiplicityWeightFactorSucc
- MPOTensor.BNTFusionTensorClause.topologicalRecursiveFactorSucc
Let \(\mu \) be the strictly positive diagonal multiplicity matrix in the retained one-site coordinates. Define \(h=\operatorname{diag}(-\log \mu )\otimes I\) on two adjacent sites. For a chain of length \(L=N+2\), let \(H_L=\sum _{i=1}^{L}h_{i,i+1}\), with periodic indices.
The terminal spectral family has cardinality at most the physical one-site dimension \(d\). Fix an injection of its indices into \(\{ 1,\ldots ,d\} \) and extend the remaining eigenvalues and projectors by zero.
Scope restriction (retained vertical coordinates): the Hamiltonian and projectors act on the retained nonzero vertical sectors. Applying the adjoint retained-row map reconstructs the physical density operator, but does not provide a Hamiltonian or projectors on the original physical space. This restriction is recorded in docs/paper-gaps/cpsv16_topological_gibbs_physical_complement.tex.
Scope restriction (positive chains of length at least two): the local interaction is defined on two spins, so these data are indexed by \(L=N+2\). The length-one boundary is recorded in docs/paper-gaps/cpsv16_topological_gibbs_length_one.tex.
- MPOTensor.BNTFusionTensorClause.terminalSpectralIndex_card_le_physicalDim
- MPOTensor.BNTFusionTensorClause.terminalSpectralEmbedding
- MPOTensor.BNTFusionTensorClause.physicalIndexedTerminalEigenvalue
- MPOTensor.BNTFusionTensorClause.physicalIndexedTopologicalSpectralProjectorSucc
- MPOTensor.BNTFusionTensorClause.retainedMultiplicityWeightEntry
- MPOTensor.BNTFusionTensorClause.retainedMultiplicityEnergyEntry
- MPOTensor.BNTFusionTensorClause.topologicalGibbsLocalTerm
- MPOTensor.BNTFusionTensorClause.topologicalGibbsHamiltonianSuccSucc
- MPOTensor.BNTFusionTensorClause.HasTopologicalGibbsDecomposition
Let \(P_\gamma \) be operators on the bond space of the vertically read tensor \(M_\gamma \). Define one fusion layer of the recursive operator \(Q\) by
The source terminal matrices are \(P_\gamma =\operatorname{tr}(M_\gamma )\) after spectral refinement, where the trace closes the horizontal operator leg and leaves the bond indices. Before spectral refinement, the fusion identity implies
Indeed, summing the forward fusion identity over equal horizontal operator indices and distributing matrix multiplication over this finite sum gives (??). This is one pairwise step in the recursion of [ CPGSV16 , lines 999–1010 ] .
Scope restriction (one fusion layer): This entry does not assert the arbitrary-chain recursion described below, nor the vertical-canonical assembly and commuting Gibbs decomposition. The remaining statements are recorded in docs/paper-gaps/cpsv16_topological_projector_recursion.tex.
- MPOTensor.BNTFusionCoisometryFamily.projectorQBlock
- MPOTensor.BNTFusionCoisometryFamily.fusionCoisometry_mul_physTraceTransfer_mul_conjTranspose
- MPOTensor.BNTFusionTensorClause.projectorQBlock
- MPOTensor.BNTFusionTensorClause.fusionCoisometry_mul_physTraceTransfer_mul_conjTranspose
- MPOTensor.BNTFusionCoisometryFamily.conjugatedProjectorQBlock
- MPOTensor.BNTFusionTensorClause.conjugatedProjectorQBlock
Fix an initial label \(\alpha \) and append labels successively along a finite chain. For total chain length \(N\geq 1\), the appended-label list has length \(N-1\); the symbols \(W_N\) and \(Q_N\) below refer to this total chain length. A fusion history records, at every step, the preceding final label, the new final label, and an index in the corresponding multiplicity space. If \(h\) ends at \(\gamma (h)\), let
For terminal bond operators \(P_\gamma \), define
The associated sequential map is obtained by tensoring the preceding map with the identity on the newly appended bond and then applying the active pairwise fusion coisometry in every preceding-history block. This is the recursively typed operator and circuit in [ CPGSV16 , lines 999–1010 ] .
A translation-invariant positive two-site bond determines finite-chain commuting-form data at every length \(N\ge 2\).
Define maps between the one-site and two-site simple-sector algebras by
The partial trace and diagonal-summand extraction define these maps on the full matrix algebras. Their agreement with the normalized maps in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.4, lines 1972–1979 ] is asserted on the weighted block-diagonal image. At this stage there is no assertion that the image is preserved, that the two maps are inverse, completely positive, or trace preserving, or that the sector labels have been matched. The final renormalization fixed-point conclusion is separate.
The canonical comparison from the right-associated full direct sum to the left-associated full direct sum is
Both intermediate labels and the final label remain in the direct sums. This definition does not select a fixed final label and makes no invertibility assertion. Its orientation is from the right-associated sum to the left-associated sum; consequently it is adjoint-oriented with respect to the printed-\(F\) row/column convention used here for [ BMW\(^{+}\)17 , Section 3.4 ] .
For an MPO tensor \(K\), its two-site blocking \(K^{[2]}\) has physical indices \((i_0,i_1)\) and \((j_0,j_1)\) and matrices
This is the blocking used in [ CPGSV16 , Theorem 4.9, lines 851–856 ] .
First pass to the physical basis selected by \(U\), so that each slice is written in the sector coordinates of Definition 26.10.3.3. Form the two-site closure of this sector-coordinate tensor, restrict it to the physical sectors \((k,h)\), and reindex its physical factors by
Denote the resulting matrix by \(\mathcal{K}_{2;k,h}(X)\).
In sector-adapted coordinates, regroup two sites by
Globally this gives the dependent-sum equivalence
The forward equivalence prepares the neighboring factors \(R_k\otimes L_h\) for the partial trace in \(\mathcal T_0\); its inverse is the shift \(\mathcal S_2\). These are the reorderings in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1521–1522 and 1555–1559 ] .
- MPOTensor.ExplicitEtaOperators.PhysicalSectorIndex
- MPOTensor.ExplicitEtaOperators.OuterSubspinIndex
- MPOTensor.ExplicitEtaOperators.NeighborSubspinIndex
- MPOTensor.ExplicitEtaOperators.SectorSiteIndex
- MPOTensor.ExplicitEtaOperators.BoundarySubspinIndex
- MPOTensor.ExplicitEtaOperators.EtaPreparationIndex
- MPOTensor.ExplicitEtaOperators.twoSiteTraceRegroupEquiv
- MPOTensor.ExplicitEtaOperators.t0RegroupEquiv
- MPOTensor.ExplicitEtaOperators.etaShiftEquiv
- MPOTensor.ExplicitEtaOperators.s2ShiftEquiv
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.t0RegroupEquiv
Let \(A\) be a tensor whose physical label is a pair \((a,b)\) of horizontal bond indices. For a bond matrix \(X\), define
The order of the entries of \(X\) is chosen so that \(A(X)_{ij}=\operatorname{tr}(M^{ij}X)\) when \(A_{ab,ij}=M^{ij}_{ab}\).
Let \(U_1\) and \(U_2\) be the physical coordinate changes in vertical canonical forms of \(M\) and its two-site blocking, respectively. Let \(J\) be the canonical relabelling from matrices indexed by pairs of one-site physical indices to matrices indexed by one blocked physical index. For the refinement and coarse-graining maps \(T\) and \(S\), define
These are the physical maps after absorbing the two vertical coordinate changes, as in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.4, lines 1955–1979 ] . They are intermediate maps on the retained physical coordinate spaces; the normalized sector maps \(R_1,R_2,\widetilde R_1,\widetilde R_2\) have not yet been composed with them.
Let \(F\) be a linear endomorphism of \(\mathcal A=\prod _\alpha M_{d_\alpha }\), and write \(\mathcal F=\{ X\in \mathcal A:F(X)=X\} \). For \(L\geq 0\), define
This is the product space used in the dimension argument of [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.4, lines 1980–1993 ] .
Closing the vertical indices of a single site of an MPO tensor \(M\) gives the matrix \(E=\sum _i M^{ii}\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), and inserting a matrix \(P\in M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\) into the loop gives \(E_P=\sum _{i,j}P_{ji}M^{ij}\), the closed loop of the vertically viewed product \(PM\), equivalently of \(MP\) by cyclicity of the single-site trace; inserting the identity recovers \(E\). On a chain of length \(N+1\), the compression of the density operator by \(P\) at the first site is \(P_1H^{(N+1)}P_1\) with \(P_1=P\otimes \mathbb {1}^{\otimes N}\), and for a matrix \(E_\alpha \in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) the chain trace with one marked loop is \(d_\alpha ^{(N+1)}=\operatorname{tr}(E_\alpha E^N)\). For a representative tensor \(M_\alpha \) whose letters are indexed by horizontal bond pairs, its closed vertical loop is defined entrywise by \((E_\alpha )_{ab}=\operatorname{tr}(M_\alpha ^{(a,b)})\). In this case the chain trace is the scalar \(d_\alpha \) displayed in the proof of [ CPGSV16 , Proposition 4.13 ] , resolved by chain length: one loop of \(M_\alpha \) followed by loops of \(M\), closed by the horizontal trace.
- MPOTensor.verticalLoop
- MPOTensor.verticalLoopWith
- MPOTensor.representativeLoop
- MPOTensor.representativeLoop_cast
- MPOTensor.verticalLoopWith_apply_eq_trace_mul_verticalTensor
- MPOTensor.verticalLoopWith_one
- MPOTensor.verticalLoop_ketLeftMul
- MPOTensor.verticalLoop_braRightMul
- MPOTensor.sectorCompression
- MPOTensor.sectorCompression_def
- MPOTensor.blockChainTrace
View the MPO tensor \(M\) vertically as the family of physical-space operators \(M_{ab}\) of Definition 23.4.4, indexed by the virtual indices, with matrix elements \((M_{ab})_{ij}=M^{ij}_{ab}\). A matrix \(P\in M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\) then acts on the tensor by
and on an \((N+1)\)-site chain by the first-spin operator \(P\otimes \mathbb {1}^{\otimes N}\). On the letters of the vertically viewed tensor these actions are the left and right matrix products, \((PM)_{ab}=PM_{ab}\) and \((MP)_{ab}=M_{ab}P\). The first-spin operators compose site by site, \(P_1Q_1=(PQ)_1\).
Let \(Z_T(X)\) be the matrix obtained by applying the normalized one-site embedding, expanding by \(U_1^\dagger \), applying \(T\), and relabelling the two-site indices, before compression by \(U_2\). Define \(Z_S(Y)\) in the reverse direction, before compression by \(U_1\).
For scalars \(c_\alpha \ne 0\), the map
is a linear equivalence.
For vertical BNT tensors \(M_\alpha \) with simple matrix algebras \(M_{d_\alpha }\) and a family of complex scalars \((c_\alpha )_\alpha \), define
For each \(L\geq 0\), let
Write \(V_m\) for the specialization obtained by taking \(c_\alpha =m_\alpha =\operatorname{tr}(\mu _\alpha )\).
In the inverse-map factorization, retain every physical sector and its factor spaces, and set
The physical-slice factorization is unchanged. This treats the zero-weight freedom left by the Hayashi decomposition used in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1415–1445 ] .
The adjoint tensor \(M^\dagger \) of an MPO tensor \(M\) exchanges the ket and bra physical indices and conjugate-transposes each virtual matrix: \((M^\dagger )^{ij}=(M^{ji})^\dagger \). A tensor equals its adjoint tensor, \(M^\dagger =M\), precisely when it is Hermitian.
For words \(u=(i_1,\ldots ,i_N)\) and \(v=(j_1,\ldots ,j_N)\) in \(\{ 0,\ldots ,d{-}1\} ^N\), the word evaluation is
The empty pair of words evaluates to the identity, \(M^{\varnothing ,\varnothing }=\mathbb {1}_D\), and word pairs of different lengths evaluate to \(0\).
The operator generated by \(M\) on \(N\) sites is the matrix \(\rho ^{(N)}(M)\) indexed by configurations \(\sigma ,\tau \in \{ 0,\ldots ,d{-}1\} ^N\) and given by
An MPO tensor \(M\) satisfies the doubled-index transfer condition when its completely positive transfer map is idempotent:
This is the condition obtained from the doubled-index MPS view. It is not the physical-trace condition of Definition 26.4.2.
For a chain of length \(N=L+R\), call \(\rho ^{(N)}(M)\) diagonal if \(\rho ^{(N)}(M)_{u,v}=0\) whenever \(u\ne v\). Call \(M\) globally diagonal if \(\rho ^{(N)}(M)\) is diagonal for every \(N{\gt}0\). For configurations \(x\) and \(y\) on the two consecutive blocks, define
The physical-trace transfer of an MPO tensor \(M\) is the virtual matrix obtained by contracting the ket and bra physical legs of one tensor:
This is the transfer object appearing in the zero-correlation-length condition of [ CPGSV16 , Definition 4.2, lines 736–741 ] .
An MPO tensor has source zero correlation length when, for some real number \(\lambda {\gt}0\), the following conditions hold:
The nonzero condition excludes the degenerate zero transfer, and the positive scalar makes the condition invariant under rescaling of \(M\).
Placing one MPO layer on top of another and contracting the shared physical index gives the layer product of two MPO tensors \(M\) and \(M'\) with the same physical dimension, \((MM')^{ij}=\sum _kM^{ik}\otimes M'^{kj}\), an MPO tensor on the tensor product of the virtual spaces. The \(p\)-fold vertical stack \(M^{[p]}\) of \(M\) is the iterated layer product of \(p\) copies of \(M\); the empty stack \(M^{[0]}\) is the trivial-bond tensor with letters \(\delta _{ij}\), which generates the identity operator at every system size.
By combining the pair \((i,j)\) into a single physical index in \(\{ 0,\ldots ,d^2-1\} \), one obtains an MPS tensor with physical dimension \(d^2\) and bond dimension \(D\), with \(M^{\mathrm{MPS}}_{(i,j)}=M^{ij}\), identifying \(\{ 0,\ldots ,d{-}1\} \times \{ 0,\ldots ,d{-}1\} \) with \(\{ 0,\ldots ,d^2{-}1\} \) via the product encoding.
A (translation-invariant, PBC) MPS tensor with physical dimension \(d\) and bond dimension \(D\) is a collection of matrices \(\{ A^i\} _{i=0}^{d-1}\), where \(A^i \in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), indexed by a physical index \(i \in \{ 0, \ldots , d{-}1\} \). Such a tensor defines an MPV family. Diagrammatically,
The black node denotes the tensor \(A\), the horizontal legs are virtual, and the upper leg is the physical index \(i\).
The matrix product vector (MPV) of a tensor \(A\) at system size \(N\) is the vector
Equivalently, for a configuration \(\sigma = (i_1, \ldots , i_N) \in \{ 0,\ldots ,d{-}1\} ^N\), we write
The coefficient function \(\sigma \mapsto V^{(N)}(A)_\sigma \) gives the components of the vector in (??); the displayed ket is the corresponding vector in \((\mathbb {C}^d)^{\otimes N}\). For a general word \(w\), we also write \(c_w(A) := \operatorname{tr}(A^w)\). The MPV family generated by \(A\) is the collection \(\mathcal{V}(A) = \bigl\{ |V^{(N)}(A)\rangle \bigr\} _{N \ge 1}\). The coefficient \(V^{(N)}(A)_\sigma \) is the periodic contraction
of \(N\) copies of the local tensor \(A\), with the outer virtual legs closed by the trace.
Two blocks \(A\) and \(B\) are MPV-phase equivalent if there is a nonzero scalar \(\zeta \) such that, for every positive system size \(N\) and every physical word, \(V^{(N)}(B)_\sigma =\zeta ^N V^{(N)}(A)_\sigma \). The two bond dimensions are allowed to differ.
For two finite nonzero-weight block families, a common MPV phase cover consists of a third finite family of blocks, a map from each nonzero-weight block family onto that common family, and MPV-phase equivalences between each block and its common representative. Both maps are required to be surjective, so the common family contains no unused representative.
The MPV inner product between two tensors \(A\) and \(B\) at system size \(N\) is
i.e. the Euclidean inner product on \(\mathbb {C}^{d^N}\) (conjugate-linear in the first argument).
The MPV overlap between two tensors \(A\) (of bond dimension \(D_1\)) and \(B\) (of bond dimension \(D_2\)) at system size \(N\) is
Diagrammatically, the overlap contracts the MPV ring of \(A\) against the conjugate ring of \(B\) along their shared physical indices, both virtual rings closed by the trace:
This pairing is linear in the first MPV coefficient and conjugate-linear in the second. By Lemma 2.7.4, it is the complex conjugate of the Hilbert-space inner product from Definition 2.7.2.
For a finite family of blocks, put \(j \sim k\) when there is a nonzero scalar factor \(\zeta \) such that \(|V^{(N)}(B_k)\rangle =\zeta ^N|V^{(N)}(B_j)\rangle \) for every positive length \(N\). The associated tuple enumerates the finite quotient, chooses one representative per class, enumerates that representative first in its class, records the scalar relating the representative to each member, and proves that distinct representatives are not MPV-phase equivalent. The pairs \((j,q)\), with \(j\) a phase class and \(q\) a copy in that class, are in bijection with the original block indices.
We regard \(|V^{(N)}(A)\rangle \) as an element of \(\mathbb {C}^{d^N}\) indexed by configurations \(\sigma \in \{ 0,\ldots ,d{-}1\} ^N\), with \(\sigma \)-component \(V^{(N)}(A)_\sigma \) as in Definition 2.1.7. This allows us to use the standard Euclidean inner product on \(\mathbb {C}^{d^N}\).
A multi-cycle decomposition of \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) consists of a finite cycle index set \(\iota \), a per-cycle period \(m:\iota \to \mathbb {N}_{{\gt}0}\), and a family of orthogonal projections \(P_{c,k}\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) for \(c\in \iota \) and \(k\in \{ 0,\ldots ,m(c){-}1\} \). For every \(c\in \iota \) and \(k\in \{ 0,\ldots ,m(c){-}1\} \), the per-cycle cyclic action is \(T(P_{c,k+1})=P_{c,k}\). The multiplicative-domain factorizations are \(T(P_{c,k}X)=T(P_{c,k})T(X)\) and \(T(XP_{c,k})=T(X)T(P_{c,k})\).
A multi-cycle decomposition gives a single-index block-permutation structure on the disjoint-union index \(\Sigma _{c\in \iota }\{ 0,\ldots ,m(c){-}1\} \): the permutation is the product of the per-cycle cyclic shifts \(k\mapsto k+1\), whose cycle decomposition has one cycle per \(c\in \iota \); the projections are \((c,k)\mapsto P_{c,k}\); and the multiplicative-domain factorizations descend componentwise. The resulting map forgets the explicit cycle indexing.
For the same fixed system size \(N\), block length \(L\le N\), and positive semidefiniteness of \(\rho ^{(N)}(M)\), the mutual information between a block of \(L\) spins and the rest is \(I_L=S_L^{(N)}(M)+S_{N-L}^{(N)}(M)-S_N^{(N)}(M)\).
The Naimark isometry \(V:\mathbb {C}^D\to \mathbb {C}^D\otimes \mathbb {C}^n\) of a POVM is the Stinespring-type construction
For a POVM \(\{ E_i\} \), each effect \(E_i\ge 0\) admits a square-root factorisation \(E_i=M_i^\dagger M_i\) with \(M_i\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\). The operators \(M_i\) are the Naimark Kraus square roots.
The Naimark projectors on \(\mathbb {C}^D\otimes \mathbb {C}^n\) are
An MPS tensor \(A\) has no nontrivial \(p\)-periodic vectors if, for every isometry \(V\) with \(V^\dagger V=\mathbb {1}\) and \(A^iV=VB^i\) for all \(i\), with \(B\) irreducible (equivalently, for every restriction \(B\) of \(A\) to a minimal invariant subspace), and for every \(\rho {\gt}0\) and \(r{\gt}0\) with \(\mathcal{E}_B(\rho )=r\rho \), every eigenvalue of \(\mathcal{E}_B\) of modulus \(r\) equals \(r\). The eigenvalue \(r\) is the spectral radius of \(\mathcal{E}_B\) (Theorem 6.10.1), so the condition states that no block of the invariant-subspace decomposition of [ CPGSV16 , Section 2 ] , rescaled to spectral radius one, has a peripheral eigenvalue \(e^{2\pi iq/p}\neq 1\). Eigenvectors with such eigenvalues are the \(p\)-periodic vectors of [ CPGSV16 , Section 2 ] .
Two tensors \(A\) and \(B\) (of possibly different bond dimensions) generate nonzero proportional MPV families if for every \(N{\gt}0\) there is a nonzero scalar \(c_N \in \mathbb {C}\) such that \(|V^{(N)}(A)\rangle = c_N |V^{(N)}(B)\rangle \). This is the projective reading of the proportionality hypothesis in [ CPGSV16 , Theorem 2.10 ] .
This is a one-copy canonical-form condition: each listed block is one representative and repeated copies are not encoded as separate blocks. A family is in normal canonical form with BNT separation if it satisfies Definition 9.9.2 and distinct blocks of the same bond dimension are not gauge-phase equivalent. The weight moduli are non-increasing but need not be strictly decreasing, so equal-modulus blocks are allowed; the grouping into a BNT is governed by gauge-phase equivalence, not by distinctness of moduli. Repeated equal-modulus copies of one basis tensor are not separate blocks here; they appear as the weights \(\mu _{j,q}\) in \(c_N^{(j)} = \sum _q \mu _{j,q}^N\) in the sector decomposition below.
For local dimension \(d\) and chain length \(N\), the \(N\)-site Hilbert space is \(\mathcal H_{N}^{(d)}:=\{ 0,\ldots ,d{-}1\} ^{N}\to \mathbb {C}\). This is the computational-basis identification used throughout the chapter for periodic-chain states.
A tensor \(A\) of physical dimension \(d\) and bond dimension \(D\) is a normal tensor if, after the spectral-radius normalization of [ CPGSV16 ] , (i) \(A\) admits no nontrivial invariant orthogonal projection and (ii) the associated CPM \(\mathcal{E}_A(X)=\sum _i A^iX(A^i)^\dagger \) has spectral radius \(r(\mathcal{E}_A)=1\) and peripheral spectrum \(\sigma _\partial (\mathcal{E}_A)=\{ 1\} \).
The predicate called on-site symmetry requires \(\mathcal{V}(A)=\mathcal{V}(\widetilde A_g)\) for every \(g\in G\), where \(U:G\to \mathrm{GL}_d(\mathbb {C})\) acts on the physical index. This is equality of periodic MPV families and is the hypothesis used to construct virtual local gauges. It is not, by itself, the source notion that every reduced density operator of an infinite physical state is invariant under \(U(g)^{\otimes N}\).
Fix an MPS tensor and a right fixed point of its transfer map. Write the tensor as \(A\) and the fixed point as \(\rho ^R\). Under the hypotheses of Theorem 6.4.2, that fixed point exists and is unique up to scaling; we normalize it so that \(\operatorname{tr}(\rho ^R)=1\). For an auxiliary-space insertion \(X\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), define
For a Kraus map \(E\), define
We follow the convention that \(\mathcal{A}_R(E)\) controls right multiplication and \(\mathcal{A}_L(E)\) controls left multiplication. These are Kraus-map specializations of the preceding abstract domains, with the names interchanged: here the subscript records the side on which the varying factor is appended, whereas the preceding convention records the side occupied by the fixed element.
Let \(A\) be an MPS tensor with Kraus family \(\{ A^i\} _{i=0}^{d-1}\), and let \(X\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\). The one-step augmentation of \(A\) by \(X\) is the tensor \(\widetilde A\) with physical dimension \(d+1\) whose first Kraus operator is \(X\) and whose remaining Kraus operators are those of \(A\):
For a tensor \(A\) with bond dimension \(D\), a left boundary covector \(v_L\in \mathbb {C}^D\), a right boundary vector \(v_R\in \mathbb {C}^D\), and a word \(w=(i_1,\ldots ,i_k)\), the open-boundary contraction is the bilinear pairing
For a finite family of matrices \(\{ C_i\} _{i\in \iota }\) and a defect block \(S\), one forms an isometric dilation whose rows are the adjoints of the matrices \(C_i\) together with the adjoint of \(S\). One also forms the scalar block-diagonal matrix whose \(\iota \)-blocks carry prescribed weights and whose defect block carries a single scalar.
On a three-site space \(\mathcal{H}_A\otimes \mathcal{H}_X\otimes \mathcal{H}_B\), let \(Q_{AX}\) and \(Q_{XB}\) be two-site projectors. Their local actions on the three-site space are the operators
The algebraic part of the overlapping nearest-neighbor commutation condition is
after these two local actions are viewed on the common three-site space. This is the local-support part of the parent commuting Hamiltonian condition in [ CPGSV16 , Definition D.2 ] . The cyclic windows beginning at \(i\) and \(i+1\) realize the two supports \(AX\) and \(XB\), and hence overlap at the middle site.
The source local condition also fixes a three-site subspace \(K_{AXB}\) and imposes the kernel-intersection equation \(K_{AXB}=\ker ((Q_{AX})_{AX})\cap \ker ((Q_{XB})_{XB})\). Forgetting this intersection equation gives the algebraic overlapping two-site commutation condition displayed above.
The two lift maps also distribute over complementary projectors:
Consequently, if the projectors \(Q_{AX}\) and \(Q_{XB}\) commute on the three-site space, then their complementary projectors \(P_{AX}=1-Q_{AX}\) and \(P_{XB}=1-Q_{XB}\) commute after the same lifts. This is the elementary algebraic passage used when one moves between the \(Q\)-projectors of [ CPGSV16 , Appendix D.2 ] and the complementary ground-space projectors \(P\). Since the original two projectors are idempotent, the complementary projectors are idempotent as well; hence the pair \(P_{AX},P_{XB}\) satisfies the same idempotent-and-commutation condition on the three-site space.
- MPSTensor.axPairCfg
- MPSTensor.xbPairCfg
- MPSTensor.replaceAXCfg
- MPSTensor.replaceXBCfg
- finThreeArrowEquiv
- MPSTensor.leftPairLift
- MPSTensor.rightPairLift
- MPSTensor.leftPairLift_sub
- MPSTensor.rightPairLift_sub
- MPSTensor.leftPairLift_one_sub
- MPSTensor.rightPairLift_one_sub
- MPSTensor.HasOverlappingTwoSiteCommutation
- MPSTensor.HasAppendixD2ParentCommutingHamiltonian
- MPSTensor.HasAppendixD2ParentCommutingHamiltonian.to_overlapping
- MPSTensor.HasOverlappingTwoSiteCommutation.left_complement_idempotent
- MPSTensor.HasOverlappingTwoSiteCommutation.right_complement_idempotent
- MPSTensor.HasOverlappingTwoSiteCommutation.commute_complement_lifts
- MPSTensor.HasOverlappingTwoSiteCommutation.complement
- MPSTensor.adjacent_twoSite_cyclicWindowsOverlap
For two blocks \(A\) and \(B\), the length-\(S\) pair word tuple is \(w\mapsto (A^w,B^w)\). We also use the subalgebra of \(M_{D_A}(\mathbb {C})\times M_{D_B}(\mathbb {C})\) generated by the one-letter pairs \((A_i,B_i)\). The pair product-span condition says that the length-\(S\) tuples span \(M_{D_A}(\mathbb {C})\times M_{D_B}(\mathbb {C})\). Equivalently, in the trace-dual formulation of the same product-span condition, the only pair of test matrices \((\Delta _A,\Delta _B)\) whose trace pairing with every length-\(S\) tuple vanishes is \((0,0)\). The cumulative variant replaces one fixed length by all word lengths at most \(S\), and the all-length variant allows every finite word.
- MPSTensor.pairAlgSpan
- MPSTensor.pairWordTuple
- MPSTensor.PairWordTupleSpanTop
- MPSTensor.PairTraceSeparatingAt
- MPSTensor.pairEvalWordTuple
- MPSTensor.pairCumulativeSpan
- MPSTensor.PairCumulativeWordTupleSpanTop
- MPSTensor.PairTraceSeparatingUpTo
- MPSTensor.PairTraceSeparatingAll
- MPSTensor.pairAllWordsSpan
- MPSTensor.PairAllWordsSpanTop
Fix a finite target set \(T\) of block indices. A length-\(S\) block-separating equation for \(k\) against \(T\) is a choice of coefficients \(c_\omega \) such that
The pairwise version requires this equation for each ordered pair of distinct blocks, with \(T=\{ j\} \).
The transfer map is primitive in the sense of [ SPGWC10 ] if there is a positive integer \(q\) such that
for every nonzero \(\varphi \in \mathbb {C}^D\). The same \(q\) works for all nonzero vectors.
For a basis of normal tensors \(A=(A_j)_{j=1}^g\) and nonzero weights \(\mu _j\), let \(B:=\bigoplus _{j=1}^g \mu _j A_j\). The ground space on the \(N\)-site ring considered in this section is \(\mathcal G_{N,L}(B)\).
Let \(B\) be a canonical-form tensor with BNT components \(A_1,\ldots ,A_g\). The source parent-Hamiltonian spanning condition is that, for every \(N{\gt}L\), \(\ker H_L^{(N)}(B)=\operatorname{span}\{ V^{(N)}(A_j):j=1,\ldots ,g\} \). This is the ground-space clause in [ CPGSV16 , Definition 3.9 ] . It is separate from the commutation equation \([\tau _j(P_L),P_L]=0\) and from the zero-energy equation for a single periodic MPS vector.
Let \(X \in M_{d \cdot d'}(\mathbb {C})\) be a bipartite matrix indexed by \((\{ 0,\ldots ,d-1\} \times \{ 0,\ldots ,d'-1\} )^2\). The left partial trace \(\operatorname{tr}_A(X)\) and right partial trace \(\operatorname{tr}_B(X)\) are the \(d' \times d'\) and \(d \times d\) matrices defined by
For an operator \(\rho \) on \(H_L\otimes H_R\), define \((\operatorname{tr}_L\rho )_{r,s}:=\sum _l\rho _{(l,r),(l,s)}\).
Let \(\sigma \) be positive semidefinite on \(H_L\otimes H_R\), and set \(\tau =\operatorname{tr}_R\sigma \). The Petz transpose formula on the support of \(\tau \) is
This is the support formula of [ HJPW04 , Theorem 3, equation (8) ] . It is not asserted to be trace preserving on operators outside the support of \(\tau \).
For a bipartite matrix \(\rho \) on \(M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\otimes M_{d'}(\mathbb {C})\), the partial transpose over the first factor is the matrix \(\rho ^{T_1}\) with entries
transposing the first index pair \(i,j\) and fixing the second pair \(k,l\).
For a bipartite matrix \(\rho \) on \(M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\otimes M_{d'}(\mathbb {C})\), the partial transpose over the second factor is the matrix \(\rho ^{T_2}\) with entries
transposing the second index pair \(k,l\) and fixing the first pair \(i,j\).
For site-periodic tensors \(A,B\) at fixed period \(m\):
equality of the induced site-periodic states;
cyclic gauge equivalence.
The peripheral eigenvalues of a linear map \(E\) on a finite-dimensional space are the eigenvalues \(\lambda \) on the unit circle: \(|\lambda | = 1\). For a channel, the spectral radius is \(1\) [ Wol12 , Proposition 6.1 ] , so these coincide with the eigenvalues of maximal modulus.
The condition \(|\lambda | = 1\) is appropriate for channels, since the spectral radius of a channel is \(1\); for a general linear map with spectral radius \(r \neq 1\) the condition would generalise to \(|\lambda | = r\).
Given an on-site symmetry datum \((u, \sigma )\), the permutation-twisted tensor at group element \(g\) is
In tensor-network notation the local tensor is unchanged and only the physical leg is relabelled:
An unnormalized positive-length PGVWC07 witness for a tensor \(A\) consists of finitely many blocks \((A_k)_{k=1}^r\) of positive bond dimensions and positive real weights \((a_k)_{k=1}^r\). Each block is unital, has only scalar transfer-map fixed points, and has a diagonal positive-definite fixed point \(\Lambda _k\) for the adjoint transfer map. Moreover,
and the retained bond dimensions satisfy \(\sum _k\dim (A_k)\le D\).
For an MPO tensor \(M\), a length \(N\), and a virtual operator \(X\), define the physical operator \(M_N(X)\) by
This is linear in \(X\). The displayed order chooses the cut of the cyclic virtual contraction immediately before the first site, so that \(X\) follows the last site. The one- and two-site operators are constructed in [ CPGSV16 , lines 638–654 and Definition 4.1 ] . When \(M=\mathcal K\), write these operators as \(\mathcal K_N(X)\); the cases \(N=2,3\) occur in [ CPGSV16 , Proposition C.7, lines 1510–1516 ] .
An MPS tensor \(A\) is a renormalization fixed point if there is an isometry \(V\colon \mathbb {C}^d\to \mathbb {C}^{d^2}\), with coefficients \(V_{(i_1,i_2),j}\) and \(V^\dagger V=\mathbb {1}\), such that, for all physical indices \(i_1,i_2\),
This is the relation \(AA=A\) in [ CPGSV16 , Definition 3.2 ] .
For an observable \(O\) on a block of \(L\) physical spins, define the linear map on the virtual matrix space by
This is the observable transfer map of [ CPGSV16 , lines 490–496 ] .
For physical operators \(x,y \in M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\), a twist \(u \in M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\), and boundary state \(\Lambda \), the transfer-form string correlator of [ PGWS\(^{+}\)08 , display SOPMP, lines 176–181 ] is
This is the physical-endpoint expression corresponding to \(\langle \Psi |\, x \otimes u^{\otimes N} \otimes y\, |\Psi \rangle \).
Let \(O_1,O_2\) act on blocks of \(L_1,L_2\) physical spins, separated around the periodic chain by complementary gaps of lengths \(n_1,n_2\). Their two-observable expectation is
The trace is the operator trace on the virtual matrix space, as in [ CPGSV16 , lines 490–496 ] .
A linear map \(T : M_{D}(\mathbb {C}) \to M_{D'}(\mathbb {C})\) between matrix algebras of possibly different dimensions is positive if \(T(X) \ge 0\) whenever \(X \ge 0\), where \(X \ge 0\) means that \(X\) is positive semidefinite. For \(D' = D\) this is the notion of Definition 4.1.1.
A positive operator-valued measure with \(n\) outcomes on \(\mathbb {C}^D\) is a family \(\{ E_i\} _{i=0}^{n-1}\) of positive semidefinite operators on \(\mathbb {C}^D\) satisfying the resolution of identity
Given an isometry \(V:\mathbb {C}^D\to \mathbb {C}^{d'}\) with \(V^\dagger V=\mathbb {1}_D\) and a family \(\{ P_i\} _{i=0}^{n-1}\) of positive semidefinite operators on \(\mathbb {C}^{d'}\) summing to the identity, the pulled-back operators \(E_i:=V^\dagger P_iV\) form a POVM. In particular, any projective measurement on the dilation (a special case of a PSD resolution of identity) pulls back to a POVM.
\(A\) has primitive irreducible cyclic sectors of period \(m\ge 1\) if there is a family \((C_k)_{k=1}^m\) with \(A^{[m]}\sim \bigoplus _{k=1}^mC_k\) with unit weights, each \(C_k\) left-canonical, with primitive transfer map, tensor-irreducible, and of positive bond dimension.
Assume \(D{\gt}0\). A tensor \(A\) together with a matrix \(\rho \in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) is primitive if
where \(P\) is the fixed-point projection associated to \(\rho \). When the choice of \(\rho \) is irrelevant, we simply say that \(A\) is a primitive MPS tensor. This condition combines a complementary spectral gap with a nonzero positive semidefinite fixed point. It is not the paper definition in Definition 8.1.1.3, which is the uniform spreading condition (??). With the additional hypothesis \(\rho {\gt}0\), the complementary-gap condition implies strong irreducibility and hence paper primitivity by Theorem 8.1.1.7.
Given a scalar 2-cochain \(\omega \), a projective representation of \(G\) on \(\mathbb {C}^D\) is a map \(\rho : G \to \mathrm{GL}_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) satisfying, for all \(g,h \in G\),
The relation called projective equivalence holds precisely when the two factor systems are cohomologous. It compares their classes in \(H^2(G,\mathbb {C}^\times )\); it does not assert an intertwining equivalence between the underlying representation spaces.
For an MPS tensor \(A\), a system size \(N\), and a block length \(L\le N\), let
denote the normalized state and the reduced state of the first \(L\) spins. The \(L\)-block entropy is \(S_L^{(N)}(A)=S(\rho _L^{(N)}(A))\). The tensor saturates the area law if \(S_L^{(N)}(A)=S_{L+1}^{(N)}(A)\) for all \(1\le L{\lt}\lfloor N/2\rfloor \) and all \(N\). This is [ CPGSV16 , Definition 3.13, line 600 ] .
Given a finite family \(\{ \psi _i\} _{i \in \iota }\) of (unnormalized) vectors in \(\mathbb {C}^D\), its pure-ensemble density is \(\rho = \sum _i |\psi _i\rangle \! \langle \psi _i|\). Weights \(p_i \geq 0\) with \(\sum p_i = 1\) can be absorbed by replacing \(\psi _i \mapsto \sqrt{p_i} \psi _i\).
For matrices \(\rho ,\sigma \in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), define the trace-log expression
On the physical domain where \(\rho \) is a density matrix and \(\sigma \) is positive definite, this is the Umegaki relative entropy.
Let \(\tau \) be a Hermitian operator on \(\mathbb {C}^{D'}\otimes \mathbb {C}^{D}\) with normalized eigenvectors \(\phi _i\). The reduced density operator of the \(i\)-th eigenvector on the first factor is \(\rho _i=\operatorname{tr}_2|\phi _i\rangle \! \langle \phi _i|\).
If \(L\le N\) and \(\tau \in \{ 0,\ldots ,d{-}1\} ^{L}\), write \(\sigma ^{[i,i+L-1]\leftarrow \tau }\) for the configuration defined by
The index \(r\) in the first case is unique because \(L\le N\).
Let \((A_j)_{j=0}^{g-1}\) be the basis representatives of a sector decomposition. They have representative word-tuple separation at length \(L\) when
They have eventual representative word-tuple separation when this equality holds at every sufficiently large length. Notice that the family is indexed by the minimal representatives \(j\), and not by the repeated copies lying over each \(j\).
Let \(\mathcal V=\bigsqcup _j\{ j\} \times [D_j]\times [D_j]\) be the disjoint union of the within-sector virtual pairs, and let \(V\colon \mathcal V\to \mathbb {C}^d\) be the common physical map whose matrix elements are \(V_{i,(j,\alpha ,\beta )}=(U_j^i)_{\alpha ,\beta }\). For each sector insert the vector \(|\varphi _j\rangle =\sum _b\lambda _{j,b}|b,b\rangle \) on the middle virtual bond, apply \(V\) on both sites, and sum the resulting physical vectors. This defines the equal-sector two-site embedding
Unequal-sector virtual bonds do not occur. The corresponding physical support operator \(P_{2,\mathrm{res}}\) is the orthogonal projector onto \(G_2(\bigoplus _j B_j)\).
For tensors \(A\) and \(B\) of possibly different bond dimensions \(D_1\) and \(D_2\), we write \(\mathcal{V}(A) = \mathcal{V}(B)\) if \(|V^{(N)}(A)\rangle = |V^{(N)}(B)\rangle \) for every word length \(N\), including the empty word. This algebraic relation is used for exact direct-sum identities.
For a matrix \(A\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), the singular values \(s_0(A),s_1(A),\ldots \) form a finitely supported family: only finitely many are nonzero. The Schatten one-norm of \(A\) is their sum, that is, the sum of the finitely many nonzero singular values:
This is the \(p=1\) case of the Schatten \(p\)-norm [ Wol12 , Chapter 8, Section 8.1 ] . The equivalent closed formula \(\lVert A\rVert _1=\sum _{i=0}^{D-1}s_i(A)\), summing over all \(D\) singular values including trailing zeros, is part of Theorem 21.1.4.
A vector \(\psi \in \mathbb {C}^{D}\otimes \mathbb {C}^{k}\) is identified with its coefficient matrix \(C_\psi \in M_{D,k}(\mathbb {C})(\mathbb {C})\). Its Schmidt rank is \(\operatorname{SR}(\psi )=\operatorname{rank}(C_\psi )\). We write \(\operatorname{SR}(\psi )\le r\) for the corresponding bounded-rank condition.
Given a sector decomposition \(P\), these conditions define the normalized, left-canonical, aperiodic BNT surface used below. This is stronger than the abstract BNT of Definition 10.1.1 and the literal coefficient-form BNT of Definition 10.1.2: besides spanning and eventual linear independence, it fixes irreducible left-canonical representatives, their self-overlap normalization, gauge-phase separation, and the canonical-form weight normalization. It imposes no equal-modulus factorization or strict ordering on the raw weights. Explicitly, each basis block has positive bond dimension, is irreducible, and is left-canonical; the normalized self-overlap of every basis block converges to \(1\); the basis MPV family is eventually linearly independent; distinct same-dimension basis blocks are not gauge-phase equivalent after identifying equal bond dimensions; and the [ CPGSV16 , Section 2.3 ] canonical-form normalization holds,
The MPV expansion takes the raw two-layer form
matching [ CPGSV16 , Section 2.3 ] and [ CPGSV21 , Definition IV.2 ] . The canonical-form normalization admits every example of the source paper (in particular \(C \oplus D\), \(C \oplus (-C)\), \(C \oplus (1/2) C\), and \(C \oplus (-C) \oplus (1/2) C\)) and is not derivable from the per-block normality hypotheses alone.
Let the sectors of two decompositions \(P\) and \(Q\) be matched by \(\beta :J(Q)\simeq J(P)\), with sector phases \(\zeta _k\). A copy-weight matching consists of copy permutations \(\tau _k\) such that, for all sectors \(k\) and copies \(q\), \(\nu _{k,q}=\zeta _k^{-1}\mu _{\beta (k),\tau _k(q)}\). This is the copy-level conclusion of [ CPGSV16 , Appendix MPV proof, line 1188 ] .
The construction takes as input a sector matching \(\beta :J(Q)\simeq J(P)\), nonzero sector phases \(\zeta _k\), and the eventual matched-sector coefficient identities
It returns the copy-weight matching obtained by choosing, in every sector, a copy permutation \(\tau _k\) satisfying \(\nu _{k,q}=\zeta _k^{-1}\mu _{\beta (k),\tau _k(q)}\). This is the sectorwise construction in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix MPV proof, line 1188 ] .
Let \(P\) be a sector decomposition with representatives \(A_j\), multiplicities \(r_j\), and copy weights \(\mu _{j,q}\). Its physical \(p\)-site blocking has the same representative and copy indices, with
The two-layer decomposition is [ CPGSV16 , lines 283–301 ] . Blocking preserves the copy index sets and bond dimensions, replaces each flattened representative by its \(p\)-site blocking, and raises each flattened weight to the \(p\)-th power.
A sector-weight tuple over \(g\) basis blocks consists of multiplicities \(r_j {\gt} 0\), nonzero weights \(\mu _{j,q}\) for \(q \in \{ 1,\ldots ,r_j\} \), and the sector coefficients
A sector decomposition consists of the basis blocks \((A_j)_{j=1}^g\) together with these multiplicities and weights. If \(A_j\) has bond dimension \(D_j\), then the flattened copy family has total bond dimension
This structure records the local ingredients of [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2 ] : a normalized three-site reduced state with equality in strong subadditivity, the resulting Markov decomposition, and a primitive matrix \(T\) with trace one and, for every positive integer \(m\), equal positive-power traces:
together with a rank-one factorization
A BNT family has zero correlation length when the associated matrix-product vectors have correlations independent of distance for all disjoint physical regions and the BNT components are locally orthogonal. This is [ CPGSV16 , Definition 3.6 ] .
For the periodic length-\(L\) matrix product vector \(|\Psi _L(A)\rangle \), the source quantity is literally
Identifying this periodic overlap with the normalized stationary-boundary functional \(T_L(A,u,\Lambda )\) requires a thermodynamic-boundary and normalization hypothesis. Thus Definition 12.3.2 must not be read as the literal source definition of \(R_L(u)\).
Let \(O_1,O_2\) act on two disjoint contiguous regions of positive lengths \(L_1,L_2\geq 1\) in a periodic chain, with complementary gap lengths \(n_1,n_2\geq 0\). Physical correlations are independent of distance when, for every \(m_1,m_2\geq 0\) satisfying \(n_1+n_2=m_1+m_2\), one has
Thus either region may be translated without crossing the other. Zero gaps, corresponding to adjacent regions, are included. This is [ CPGSV16 , Definition 3.3 and lines 490–496 ] .
Let \(S\) be a \(*\)-subalgebra of \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), and let \(W,W'\subseteq \mathbb {C}^D\). A linear operator \(f:\mathbb {C}^D\to \mathbb {C}^D\) is an intertwiner from \(W\) into \(W'\) when \(f(W)\subseteq W'\) and \(f(Ax)=A(fx)\) for every \(A\in S\) and \(x\in W\).
Let \(S\) be a \(*\)-subalgebra of \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\). A subspace \(W\subseteq \mathbb {C}^D\) is irreducible under \(S\) when it is nonzero, invariant under every member of \(S\), and its only invariant subspaces are \(\{ 0\} \) and \(W\).
Let \(S\) be a \(*\)-subalgebra of \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), and let \(W,W'\subseteq \mathbb {C}^D\) be invariant under \(S\). The pieces \(W\) and \(W'\) are of the same type when there is an intertwiner from \(W\) into \(W'\) that is nonzero on \(W\).
For an irreducible channel \(E\) on \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) with \(D\geq 1\), the stationary state is the unique density-matrix fixed point \(\rho _\infty \) satisfying \(E(\rho _\infty )=\rho _\infty \), \(\rho _\infty {\gt}0\), and \(\operatorname{tr}(\rho _\infty )=1\). Existence, uniqueness, and positive definiteness follow from Theorem 6.9.1.
Given possibly rectangular Kraus operators \(K_j:\mathbb {C}^{d_{\mathrm{in}}}\to \mathbb {C}^{d_{\mathrm{out}}}\), the Stinespring matrix \(V:\mathbb {C}^{d_{\mathrm{in}}}\to \mathbb {C}^{d_{\mathrm{out}}}\otimes \mathbb {C}^r\) is defined by
Thus \(V=\sum _j K_j\otimes |j\rangle \). It is an isometry precisely when the Kraus family satisfies the trace-preserving normalization.
For a boundary state \(\Lambda \) and boundary matrices \(X,Y \in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), the virtual-boundary twist functional is
The special case \(X=Y=\mathbb {1}\) is the stationary-boundary block-twist functional of Definition 12.3.2. The matrices \(X,Y\) act on the virtual level. In the physical string correlator of [ PGWS\(^{+}\)08 ] the string of twists is instead flanked by local operators \(x,y\) acting on physical sites; expanding such operators in the transfer picture produces particular virtual matrices, and [ PGWS\(^{+}\)08 ] argues that for injective tensors, physical operators on sufficiently many sites produce every virtual matrix. The results below are stated directly in this virtual-boundary form.
The stationary-boundary block-twist functional is
In tensor-network notation this is the length-\(L\) doubled chain with a copy of \(u\) inserted on each physical rung:
The boundary matrix \(\Lambda \) is contracted into the virtual boundary, the red nodes labelled \(u\) sit on the physical rungs, and the right boundary is traced.
We call the tensor strongly irreducible here if there is a matrix \(\rho {\gt}0\) such that
and \(\mathcal{E}_A\) is irreducible. The condition in [ SPGWC10 , Proposition 3(c) ] requires that \(1\) be the only peripheral eigenvalue and that its eigenspace be one-dimensional, generated by a positive-definite fixed point. The definition above strengthens this condition by also requiring irreducibility explicitly.
Let \(\tau =\sum _i\lambda _i|i\rangle \! \langle i|\) be positive semidefinite. Its inverse square root on the support is
For a positive semidefinite matrix \(\rho \ge 0\), the support projection \(P\) is the orthogonal projection onto the range of \(\rho \). Via the spectral decomposition \(\rho =U\operatorname{diag}(\lambda _1,\ldots ,\lambda _D)U^\dagger \), it is
where \(\mathbf{1}_{\lambda _j{\gt}0}\) is \(1\) if \(\lambda _j{\gt}0\) and \(0\) otherwise.
For a real parameter \(\eta \), the map \(T_\eta \) on \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) is
The map is defined for every real \(\eta \); at \(\eta =0\) it reduces to \(\rho \mapsto \operatorname{tr}(\rho ) \mathbb {1}\), and the positivity threshold below assumes \(\eta {\gt}0\).
Given a linear map \(T : M_{D}(\mathbb {C}) \to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), the tensor extension \(T \otimes \operatorname{id}\) acts on bipartite matrices \(X \in M_{D \times D}(\mathbb {C})\) by applying \(T\) to each “slice”:
where \(X^{(i_2,j_2)}_{ab} = X_{(a,i_2),(b,j_2)}\) is the bipartite slice.
An MPS tensor \(A=\{ A^i\} _{i=0}^{d-1}\) determines an MPO tensor by placing \(A^i\) on the diagonal in the bra and ket indices:
Equivalently, \(M^{ii}=A^i\) and \(M^{ij}=0\) for \(i\ne j\).
A Kraus map is trace-preserving if \(\sum _{i=0}^{d-1} K_i^\dagger K_i = \mathbb {1}\). Equivalently, the adjoint Kraus map is unital. This is the standard MPS normalization condition. In the later gauge language it is the left-canonical condition, so Kadison–Schwarz arguments are often applied to the adjoint map.
The trace-pairing adjoint \(E^* : M_{D'}(\mathbb {C}) \to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) of a linear map \(E : M_{D}(\mathbb {C}) \to M_{D'}(\mathbb {C})\) between matrix algebras of possibly different dimensions is the adjoint for the bilinear pairing \((A,B)\mapsto \operatorname{tr}(AB)\).
A basis \(\{ \sigma _i\} _i\) of \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) is trace-self-dual when its coordinate functionals are given by trace pairing:
A linear map \(T : M_{D}(\mathbb {C}) \to M_{D'}(\mathbb {C})\) between matrix algebras of possibly different dimensions is trace-preserving if \(\operatorname{tr}(T(X)) = \operatorname{tr}(X)\) for all \(X\). For \(D' = D\) this is the notion of Definition 4.1.2.
For a tripartite matrix \(\rho _{ABC}\) on \(\mathbb {C}^{d_A} \otimes \mathbb {C}^{d_B} \otimes \mathbb {C}^{d_C}\), the partial trace over \(A\) is
The transfer map associated to a tensor \(A\) is the linear map \(\mathcal{E}_A : M_{D}(\mathbb {C}) \to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) defined by
Diagrammatically, the transfer map is the double-layer contraction
in which the upper node denotes \(A\), the lower node denotes \(A^\dagger \), and the physical index is summed over between them.
For matrices \(A,B\) on \(M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\) and the SWAP operator \(F\) on \(M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\otimes M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\), the transposition witness is \(W=(A\otimes B)\, F\, (A\otimes B)^\dagger \). These are the entanglement witnesses associated with the transposition map.
Writing \(\widehat M_R\) for the lift of an operator \(M_R\) supported on \(R\in \{ AX,XB,A,B\} \), the four lifts to \(H_A\otimes (H_X\otimes H_B)\) are
The first and fourth formulas use the canonical identification \((H_A\otimes H_X)\otimes H_B\cong H_A\otimes (H_X\otimes H_B)\).
For a Hermitian operator \(P\), let \(P_{AX}\) and \(P_{XB}\) be the support projectors of \(\operatorname{tr}_B P\) and \(\operatorname{tr}_A P\), respectively, as in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix D.2, lines 2225–2229 ] . Write \(\widehat P_{AX}\) and \(\widehat P_{XB}\) for their lifts to the tripartite space.
The two reduced operators are \(\rho _{AX}=\operatorname{tr}_B P\) and \(\rho _{XB}=\operatorname{tr}_A P\).
Regions \(A\) and \(B\) are decorrelated relative to \(P\) if, for all Hermitian observables \(O_A=O_A^\dagger \) and \(O_B=O_B^\dagger \), one has \(P O_A(\mathbb {1}-P)O_B P=0\). This is [ CPGSV16 , Definition D.1, lines 2187–2191 ] .
There are orthogonal projectors \(P_{AX}\) and \(P_{XB}\) on the two local factors whose lifts commute and whose ranges satisfy the source ground-space intersection condition \(\operatorname{ran}P=\operatorname{ran}\widehat P_{AX}\cap \operatorname{ran}\widehat P_{XB}\). Thus \(Q_{AX}=\mathbb {1}-P_{AX}\) and \(Q_{XB}=\mathbb {1}-P_{XB}\) are exactly the commuting parent terms of [ CPGSV16 , Definition D.2, lines 2205–2218 ] .
Given nonzero weights \((\mu _k)_{k=1}^r\) and blocks \((B_k)_{k=1}^r\), the single-copy sector decomposition has \(r\) sectors, one basis block \(B_k\) per sector, multiplicity \(1\), and sector weight \(\mu _k\). As a finite sum,
Given a group representation \(U : G \to \mathrm{GL}_{d}(\mathbb {C})\) on the physical index, the \(g\)-twisted tensor is defined, for each \(i \in \{ 0,\ldots ,d{-}1\} \), by
A common trace-preserving gauge setup for \((A,u)\) consists of a tensor \(B\) equal to the companion \(B_u\) and satisfying \(\mathcal{E}_B(X)=\mathcal{E}_A(X)\) for every \(X\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\). It also includes a positive definite matrix \(\sigma \) fixed by the adjoint transfer map of \(B\), its positive square root \(S\), and gauged tensors \(A',B'\) satisfying
In addition,
together with irreducibility of both \(A'\) and \(B'\). These identities complete the common trace-preserving gauge data.
Let \(D{\gt}0\). If \(A\) is injective, \(uu^\dagger =\mathbb {1}_d\), and \(\mathcal{E}_A(\mathbb {1})=\mathbb {1}\), define the common trace-preserving gauge setup for \((A,u)\) by choosing the unique positive definite stationary state of the adjoint channel and using the data in Definition H.5.2.
Given an MPS tensor \(A\) and a physical-index matrix \(u\), the twisted transfer map is
Diagrammatically one inserts the physical operator \(u\) on the doubled local transfer cell:
The upper and lower black nodes denote \(A_n\) and \(A_{n'}^\dagger \), and the red node labelled \(u\) couples the physical legs.
For Pauli directions \(a,b\in \{ x,y,z\} \) and real rates \(\gamma _a,\gamma _b\), define
In particular, \(\mathcal L_{a,b}(\mathbb {1})=0\).
For auxiliary-space insertions \(X,Y\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) and \(n\ge 0\), define
Equivalently, insert \(X\) at site \(0\), propagate by \(\mathcal{E}_A^n\), then insert \(Y\) and take the trace.
For a unitary matrix \(U \in \mathcal{U}(D)\), the unitary channel is \(T(\rho )=U\rho U^\dagger \). It is automatically a quantum channel.
The fixed-length vector span at length \(n\) is
This is \(S_n(A)|\varphi \rangle \) in the notation of [ SPGWC10 ] .
An MPO tensor is in vertical canonical form if there are a basis of normal tensors \(\{ M_\alpha \} _\alpha \) for its vertically viewed tensor \(\widetilde M\), positive diagonal matrices \(\mu _\alpha =\operatorname{diag}(\omega _{\alpha ,0},\ldots ,\omega _{\alpha ,r_\alpha -1})\) with \(r_\alpha \geq 1\), and a matrix \(U\) from the physical space onto the retained nonzero sector space such that
This is the conclusion of [ CPGSV16 , Proposition 4.13, lines 1863–1870 ] . In this orientation \(UU^\dagger =I\) on the retained space, while \(U^\dagger U\) is its support projection in the original physical space. The reconstruction identity says that every letter of \(\widetilde M\) is supported on this projection, so the discarded orthogonal complement and the off-diagonal corners vanish. The orthogonal complement may be a zero sector: the source’s general canonical-form construction explicitly permits the sum of the nonzero block dimensions to be strictly smaller than the original dimension [ CPGSV16 , lines 214–225 ] . Since each \(\mu _\alpha \) is diagonal, the summand \(\mu _\alpha \otimes M_\alpha \) is the direct sum \(\bigoplus _{k=0}^{r_\alpha -1}\omega _{\alpha ,k}M_\alpha \) of weighted copies of \(M_\alpha \), so the right-hand side is a block-diagonal tensor over the pairs \((\alpha ,k)\) in which the multiplicities \(r_\alpha \) and the diagonal entries \(\omega _{\alpha ,k}\) stay explicit; the coefficients \(m_\alpha =\operatorname{tr}(\mu _\alpha )=\sum _{k=0}^{r_\alpha -1}\omega _{\alpha ,k}\) appearing in the renormalization fixed-point characterization are recovered from them.
Let \(W_k:\mathbb {C}^{D_k}\to \mathbb {C}^d\) be a finite family of rectangular matrices. Their block-row map \(U:\mathbb {C}^d\to \bigoplus _k\mathbb {C}^{D_k}\) is defined by \(Ux=(W_k^\dagger x)_k\). This realizes the coisometry in the conclusion of [ CPGSV16 , Proposition 4.13, lines 1863–1870 ] once the sector isometries have been normalized.
The vertical direction of an MPO tensor exchanges the notion of physical and virtual indices [ CPGSV16 , line 943 ] : the vertically viewed tensor \(\widetilde M\) has its letters indexed by the horizontal bond pair \((a,b)\), and each letter is the operator on the physical space with matrix elements \((\widetilde M_{ab})_{ij}=M^{ij}_{ab}\). Concatenating \(\widetilde M\) vertically generates the matrix product vectors of the vertical direction.
For a Hermitian matrix \(\rho \in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) with eigenvalues \(\lambda _0,\ldots ,\lambda _{D-1}\), the von Neumann entropy is
where \(0\log 0:=0\).
For \(N\geq 0\), the W-state amplitude is the indicator of the single-excitation configurations:
Set \(d=D=2\). The W tensor is the site-independent family
with left boundary covector \((l|=(0|\) and right boundary vector \(|r)=|1)\). Here \(A^1\) is the single raising operator: it sends \(|1)\mapsto |0)\) and annihilates \(|0)\), and squares to zero.
If no nonzero trace functional vanishes on all finite pair words, then there is a finite \(S\) such that vanishing on every word of length at most \(S\) already forces the test pair to be zero. For a finite family of ordered block pairs, these bounds can be replaced by one common bound.
- MPSTensor.pairEvalWordTuple_mem_pairCumulativeSpan
- MPSTensor.pairCumulativeSpan_mono
- MPSTensor.PairTraceSeparatingUpTo.mono
- MPSTensor.pairTraceSeparatingUpTo_of_pairTraceSeparatingAt
- MPSTensor.pairTraceSeparatingAt_of_pairWordTupleSpanTop
- MPSTensor.pairWordTupleSpanTop_iff_pairTraceSeparatingAt
- MPSTensor.pairCumulativeWordTupleSpanTop_of_pairTraceSeparatingUpTo
- MPSTensor.pairTraceSeparatingUpTo_of_pairCumulativeWordTupleSpanTop
- MPSTensor.pairCumulativeWordTupleSpanTop_iff_pairTraceSeparatingUpTo
- MPSTensor.pairCumulativeWordTupleSpanTop_of_pairWordTupleSpanTop
- MPSTensor.pairCumulativeWordTupleSpanTop_of_pairTraceSeparatingAt
- MPSTensor.pairAllWordsSpanTop_of_pairTraceSeparatingAll
- MPSTensor.pairTraceSeparatingAll_of_pairAllWordsSpanTop
- MPSTensor.pairAllWordsSpanTop_iff_pairTraceSeparatingAll
- MPSTensor.exists_pairCumulativeWordTupleSpanTop_of_pairAllWordsSpanTop
- MPSTensor.exists_pairTraceSeparatingUpTo_of_pairTraceSeparatingAll
- MPSTensor.exists_pairTraceSeparatingUpTo_iff_pairTraceSeparatingAll
- MPSTensor.exists_forall_pairTraceSeparatingUpTo_of_forall_pairTraceSeparatingAll
Let \((A_i)_{i\in I}\) span \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), and let \(C:\mathbb {C}^{m_2}\otimes \mathbb {C}^D\longrightarrow \mathbb {C}^{m_1}\otimes \mathbb {C}^D\) satisfy, for every \(i\in I\),
Then there is a matrix \(F:\mathbb {C}^{m_2}\to \mathbb {C}^{m_1}\) such that \(C=F\otimes \mathbb {1}_D\).
Let \(P_i\) be a finite family of symmetric projections and let \(H=\sum _iP_i\). Suppose the anticommutator forms obey
with row sums \(\sum _{j\ne i}c_{ij}\le 1\), column sums \(\sum _{i\ne j}c_{ij}\le 1\), and \(\gamma \le 1\). Then \(H^2\ge \gamma H\) as a quadratic form.
Let \(Q_{AX}\) and \(Q_{XB}\) be the two-site coefficient-space transports of source projectors satisfying the Definition D.2 local condition on \(A X B\). If these transported projectors agree with the Appendix B coefficient representatives,
then \(\widehat Q_{AX}\) and \(\widehat Q_{XB}\) satisfy the algebraic overlapping two-site condition of Definition 14.1.1. Consequently, \(h_0^{(3)}(A,2)h_1^{(3)}(A,2) = h_1^{(3)}(A,2)h_0^{(3)}(A,2)\).
If the Appendix B \(AX\) and \(XB\) coefficient representatives satisfy the lifted Definition D.2 commutator
then the corresponding first two translated length-two local terms on the three-site window commute: \(h_0^{(3)}(A,2)h_1^{(3)}(A,2) = h_1^{(3)}(A,2)h_0^{(3)}(A,2)\). The same conclusion holds if one supplies a Definition D.2-shaped local condition whose two operators are these coefficient-space representatives, rather than the source projectors themselves.
Suppose the lifted \(AX\) and \(XB\) representatives commute:
Then \(\widehat Q_{AX}\) and \(\widehat Q_{XB}\) satisfy the algebraic overlapping two-site condition of Definition 14.1.1.
If the Appendix B \(AX\) and \(XB\) coefficient representatives satisfy the overlapping two-site commutation datum
then the corresponding first two translated length-two local terms on the three-site window commute: \(h_0^{(3)}(A,2)h_1^{(3)}(A,2) = h_1^{(3)}(A,2)h_0^{(3)}(A,2)\).
The two Appendix B two-site coefficient representatives are idempotent:
As coefficient-space representatives, \(\widehat Q_{AX}=q_2(A)\) and \(\widehat Q_{XB}=q_2(A)\).
On the three-site \(A,X,B\) window, the two adjacent length-two local terms are the two local lifts
Let \(A^1,\ldots ,A^g\) be block tensors with the common word-span property at length \(m\). Fix \(N\in \mathbb {N}\), complex numbers \(\mu _j\), and block-diagonal boundary matrices \(X_j\), and put \(D^j_\beta =(\mu _j^NX_j)A^j_\beta \). Suppose that, for every wrapped word \(\beta \) of length \(K\), every complementary word \(\rho \) of length \(M\), and every middle word \(w\) of length \(m\),
If each block satisfies \(\sum _a A^j_aA^{j\, \dagger }_a = \mathbb {1}\), then, for every block \(j\), there is a matrix \(E^j = \sum _\rho C^j_\rho \left(A^j_\rho \right)^\dagger \) such that, for every wrapped word \(\beta \) and complementary word \(\rho \),
This is the boundary-matrix calculation in [ PGVWC07 , Theorem 12, proof lines 1446–1451 ] , after substituting the block-diagonal boundary matrix \(D^j_\beta =(\mu _j^NX_j)A^j_\beta \).
Let \(X_j,Y_j\in M_{D_j}(\mathbb {C})\), and suppose
If the simultaneous block words of length \(K\) span \(\prod _jM_{D_j}(\mathbb {C})\), then, for every block \(j\) and every word \(\alpha \) of length \(S\), \(X_jA^j_\alpha = A^j_\alpha Y_j\).
Let \(B=\bigoplus _{j=1}^g\mu _jA_j\), where \(\mu _j\ne 0\) for \(1\le j\le g\). If the periodic-boundary comparison with block-diagonal boundary conditions gives
then \(\mathcal G_{N,L}(B) = \bigvee _{j=1}^g\mathcal G_{N,L}(A_j)\).
Assume \(0{\lt}N\) and \(L\le N\), and assume that, for every block \(j\), the length-\(N-L\) word products of \(A_j\) span the full matrix algebra. Suppose that, for every block \(j\), every boundary-crossing interval beginning at \(i\), and every outside word \(\rho \) of length \(N-L\), there is a matrix \(E_{j,i,\rho }\) such that, for every word \(\beta \) before the cut of length \(i+L-N\), \(\mu _j^N X_j A^j_\beta A^j_\rho = A^j_\beta E_{j,i,\rho }\). Then, for every block \(j\), \(\Gamma _N^{A_j}(\mu _j^NX_j) \in \mathcal G_{N,L}(A_j)\).
Assume \(0{\lt}N\), \(L\le N\), and \(L+L_0\le N\). Suppose each block \(A_j\) is \(L_0\)-block-injective and satisfies the normalization equation \(\sum _a A^j_aA^{j\dagger }_a=\mathbb {1}\). Suppose also that the boundary-crossing matrix identities of Lemma 15.3.1.21 hold for every outside word \(\rho \) of length \(N-L\). Then, for every block \(j\), \(\Gamma _N^{A_j}(\mu _j^NX_j) \in \mathcal G_{N,L}(A_j)\).
Assume \(0{\lt}N\) and \(L\le N\). Fix block-diagonal boundary conditions \(X_j\). Suppose that, for every block \(j\), every cyclic interval beginning at \(i\) with \(N{\lt}i+L\), and every configuration \(\tau \),
Then, for every block \(j\), \(\Gamma _N^{A_j}(\mu _j^NX_j) \in \mathcal G_{N,L}(A_j)\).
Assume \(0{\lt}N\), \(L\le N\), and \(L+L_0\le N\). Suppose each block \(A_j\) is \(L_0\)-block-injective and satisfies \(\sum _a A^j_aA^{j\dagger }_a=\mathbb {1}\). Fix block-diagonal boundary conditions \(X_j\). For every boundary-crossing interval beginning at \(i\), suppose there are matrices \(C^j_{i,\rho }\), indexed by outside words \(\rho \) of length \(N-L\), such that, for every word \(\beta \) before the cut of length \(i+L-N\), \(A^j_\beta C^j_{i,\rho } = ((\mu _j^NX_j)A^j_\beta )A^j_\rho \). After opening the periodic boundary at the chosen cut, this is the source comparison
Then, for every block \(j\), \(\Gamma _N^{A_j}(\mu _j^NX_j) \in \mathcal G_{N,L}(A_j)\).
Assume \(0{\lt}N\) and \(L\le N\). Fix block-diagonal boundary conditions \(X_j\). Suppose that, for every block \(j\), every boundary-crossing interval beginning at \(i\), and every configuration \(\tau \), there is a matrix \(Y_{j,i,\tau }\) such that, for every word \(\beta \) of length \(a=i+L-N\), \(\mu _j^N X_j A^j_\beta = A^j_\beta Y_{j,i,\tau }\). Then, for every block \(j\), \(\Gamma _N^{A_j}(\mu _j^NX_j) \in \mathcal G_{N,L}(A_j)\).
Assume \(0{\lt}N\), \(L\le N\), and \(L+L_0\le N\). Suppose each block \(A_j\) is \(L_0\)-block-injective and satisfies \(\sum _a A^j_aA^{j\dagger }_a=\mathbb {1}\). Assume also that the simultaneous tuples \(w\mapsto (A^1_w,\ldots ,A^g_w)\) at the middle-word length \(m\) span the full product algebra \(\prod _jM_{D_j}(\mathbb {C})\). Fix complex numbers \(\mu _j\) and block-diagonal boundary conditions \(X_j\). For every boundary-crossing interval beginning at \(i\), suppose there are matrices \(C^j_{i,\rho }\), indexed by outside words \(\rho \) of length \(N-L\), such that, for every word \(\beta \) before the cut, outside word \(\rho \), and middle word \(w\),
Then, for every block \(j\), \(\Gamma _N^{A_j}(\mu _j^NX_j) \in \mathcal G_{N,L}(A_j)\).
Assume \(0{\lt}N\), \(L\le N\), and let the cyclic interval beginning at \(i\) cross the boundary cut, so \(N{\lt}i+L\). Write \(a=i+L-N\). For a local word \(\sigma \) of length \(L\), set
Then the corresponding coefficient of the \(j\)-th block component is
Assume \(0{\lt}N\), \(L\le N\), and let the cyclic interval beginning at \(i\) cross the boundary cut, so \(N{\lt}i+L\). Put \(a=i+L-N\). Suppose that there is a matrix \(E\) such that for every word \(\beta \) of length \(a\),
Then
Assume \(0{\lt}N\) and \(L\le N\), and let the cyclic interval beginning at \(i\) cross the boundary cut, so \(N{\lt}i+L\). Put \(a=i+L-N\). Suppose that there is a matrix \(Y\) such that, for every word \(\beta \) of length \(a\), \(\mu _j^N X_j A^j_\beta = A^j_\beta Y\). Then
Assume \(0{\lt}N\), \(L\le N\), and let the cyclic interval beginning at \(i\) cross the boundary cut, so \(N{\lt}i+L\). Put \(a=i+L-N\). For a local word \(\sigma \) of length \(L\), write
These are the word coordinates obtained by opening the periodic boundary at the chosen cut, in the comparison with the source expressions involving \(C^j_{i_1}\) and \(D^j_{i_{m+1}}\). If
then there are matrices \(C^j_{i,\tau }\) such that, for every \(\sigma \),
Assume that the physical dimension \(d\) is positive, \(0{\lt}N\), \(L\le N\), and \(\mu _j\ne 0\) for every block \(j\). Let the cyclic interval beginning at \(i\) cross the boundary cut, so \(N{\lt}i+L\). Let
For every outside word \(\rho \) of length \(N-L\), there are matrices \(C^j_{i,\rho }\) such that, for every word \(\beta \) of length \(i+L-N\) before the cut and every wrapped tail word \(\alpha \) of length \(N-i\),
Assume that the physical dimension \(d\) is positive, \(0{\lt}N\), \(L\le N\), and \(\mu _j\ne 0\) for every block \(j\). Let
Then there are matrices \(C^j_{i,\rho }\), indexed by the boundary-crossing start \(i\) and by an outside word \(\rho \) of length \(N-L\), such that whenever \(N{\lt}i+L\),
for every word \(\beta \) of length \(i+L-N\) before the cut and every wrapped tail word \(\alpha \) of length \(N-i\).
Let \(B=\bigoplus _{j=1}^g\mu _jA_j\), and fix block-diagonal boundary conditions \(X_j\). For every cyclic restriction \(R_{i,\tau }\) from \(N\) sites to \(L\) sites,
Let \(B=\bigoplus _{j=1}^g\mu _jA_j\). Suppose that every vector \(\psi \in \mathcal G_{N,L}(B)\) can be written as
Then
Let \(B=\bigoplus _{j=1}^g\mu _jA_j\), with \(\mu _j\ne 0\), and suppose
Then every local constraint of \(\psi \) gives
Fix block-diagonal boundary conditions \(X_j\). If the cyclic window beginning at \(i\) stays inside the chosen linear interval, \(i+L\le N\), then for every block \(j\),
With the hypotheses and notation of Lemma 15.3.10, assume in addition that \(L+L_0\le N\). Let \(\psi \in \mathcal G_{N,L}(\bigoplus _j\mu _jA_j)\). Suppose that whenever \(\psi =\Gamma _N^{\oplus _j\mu _jA_j}(\bigoplus _jX_j)\), the corresponding boundary conditions satisfy the block-diagonal boundary-condition equations: for every boundary-crossing interval \(i\), every word \(\beta \) before the cut, and every outside word \(\rho \) of length \(N-L\), \(\mu _j^N X_jA^j_\beta A^j_\rho = A^j_\beta E_{j,i,\rho }\). Then there are block-diagonal boundary conditions \(X_j\) such that the displayed representation holds and, for every \(j\), the displayed component lies in the corresponding single-block ground space:
Assume \(0{\lt}N\), \(L\le N\), and \(L+L_0\le N\). Suppose each block \(A_j\) is \(L_0\)-block-injective and satisfies \(\sum _a A^j_aA^{j\dagger }_a=\mathbb {1}\). Let
If every boundary-crossing interval has the corresponding tail-word spanning property, then there are block-diagonal boundary conditions \(X_j\) with the displayed representation of \(\psi \) and, for every \(j\), \(\Gamma _N^{A_j}(\mu _j^NX_j) \in \mathcal G_{N,L}(A_j)\).
With the hypotheses and notation of Lemma 15.3.10, assume in addition that \(L+L_0\le N\). Let \(\psi \in \mathcal G_{N,L}(\bigoplus _j\mu _jA_j)\). Suppose that whenever \(\psi =\Gamma _N^{\oplus _j\mu _jA_j}(\bigoplus _jX_j)\), there are matrices \(C^j_{i,\rho }\) such that, for every boundary-crossing interval \(i\), every outside word \(\rho \) of length \(N-L\), and every word \(\beta \) before the cut, \(A^j_\beta C^j_{i,\rho } = ((\mu _j^NX_j)A^j_\beta )A^j_\rho \). Then there are block-diagonal boundary conditions \(X_j\) such that the displayed representation holds and, for every \(j\), the displayed component lies in the corresponding single-block ground space:
Assume \(0{\lt}N\), \(L\le N\), and \(L+L_0\le N\). Suppose each block \(A_j\) is \(L_0\)-block-injective and satisfies \(\sum _a A^j_aA^{j\dagger }_a=\mathbb {1}\). Assume also that the simultaneous tuples \(w\mapsto (A^1_w,\ldots ,A^g_w)\) at the middle-word length \(m\) span the full product algebra \(\prod _jM_{D_j}(\mathbb {C})\). Let \(\psi =\Gamma _N^{\oplus _j\mu _jA_j}(\bigoplus _jX_j)\) for some block-diagonal boundary conditions \(X_j\). Suppose that whenever \(\psi \) has such a representation, there are matrices \(C^j_{i,\rho }\) such that, for every boundary-crossing interval \(i\), every outside word \(\rho \) of length \(N-L\), and every word \(\beta \) of length \(i+L-N\) before the cut, \(A^j_\beta C^j_{i,\rho } = ((\mu _j^NX_j)A^j_\beta )A^j_\rho \). Then there are block-diagonal boundary conditions \(X_j\) such that the displayed representation holds and, for every \(j\), the displayed component lies in the corresponding single-block ground space:
With the hypotheses and notation of Lemma 15.3.10, assume in addition that \(L+L_0\le N\). Assume also that, for some middle-word length \(m\), the simultaneous tuples \(w\mapsto (A^1_w,\ldots ,A^g_w)\), where \(w\) ranges over words of length \(m\) in \(\{ 0,\ldots ,d{-}1\} \), span the full product algebra \(\prod _jM_{D_j}(\mathbb {C})\). Let \(\psi \in \mathcal G_{N,L}(\bigoplus _j\mu _jA_j)\). Suppose that whenever \(\psi =\Gamma _N^{\oplus _j\mu _jA_j}(\bigoplus _jX_j)\), there are matrices \(C^j_{i,\rho }\) such that, for every boundary-crossing interval \(i\), every outside word \(\rho \) of length \(N-L\), every word \(\beta \) before the cut, and every word \(w\) of length \(m\),
Then there are block-diagonal boundary conditions \(X_j\) such that the displayed representation holds and, for every \(j\), the displayed component lies in the corresponding single-block ground space:
With the hypotheses and notation of Lemma 15.3.10, assume in addition that \(L+L_0\le N\) and \(L \ge (L_0+1) +(g-1)((L_0+1)+((L_0+1)+(L_0+1)))+1\). Put \(m = (L_0+1) +(g-1)((L_0+1)+((L_0+1)+(L_0+1)))\). Let \(\psi \in \mathcal G_{N,L}(\bigoplus _j\mu _jA_j)\). Suppose that whenever \(\psi =\Gamma _N^{\oplus _j\mu _jA_j}(\bigoplus _jX_j)\), there are matrices \(C^j_{i,\rho }\) such that, for every boundary-crossing interval \(i\), every outside word \(\rho \) of length \(N-L\), every word \(\beta \) before the cut, and every word \(w\) of length \(m\),
Then there are block-diagonal boundary conditions \(X_j\) such that the displayed representation holds and, for every \(j\), the displayed component lies in the corresponding single-block ground space:
Assume \(0{\lt}N\), \(L\le N\), and \(L+L_0\le N\). Suppose each block \(A_j\) is \(L_0\)-block-injective and satisfies \(\sum _a A^j_aA^{j\dagger }_a=\mathbb {1}\). Assume also that the simultaneous tuples \(w\mapsto (A^1_w,\ldots ,A^g_w)\) at the middle-word length \(m\) span the full product algebra \(\prod _jM_{D_j}(\mathbb {C})\). Let
for some block-diagonal boundary conditions \(X_j\). Suppose that whenever \(\psi \) has such a representation, there are matrices \(C^j_{i,\rho }\) such that, for every boundary-crossing interval \(i\), every outside word \(\rho \) of length \(N-L\), every word \(\beta \) of length \(i+L-N\) before the cut, and every word \(w\) of length \(m\),
Then there are block-diagonal boundary conditions \(X_j\) with
and, for every \(j\), \(\Gamma _N^{A_j}(\mu _j^NX_j) \in \mathcal G_{N,L}(A_j)\).
Let \(B=\bigoplus _{j=1}^g\mu _jA_j\). Suppose every \(\psi \in \mathcal G_{N,L}(B)\) admits block-diagonal boundary conditions \(X_j\) such that \(\psi = \Gamma _N^B\! \left(\bigoplus _{j=1}^gX_j\right)\), and, for every \(j\), \(\Gamma _N^{A_j}(\mu _j^N X_j)\in \mathcal G_{N,L}(A_j)\). Then
Fix block-diagonal boundary matrices \(X_j\). Suppose the opened-boundary matrices \(C^j_{i,\rho }\) satisfy, for every boundary-crossing interval \(i\), every outside word \(\rho \), and every word \(\beta \) before the cut, \(A^j_\beta C^j_{i,\rho } = ((\mu _j^NX_j)A^j_\beta )A^j_\rho \). Then, for every middle word \(w\),
Let \(B=\bigoplus _{j=1}^g\mu _jA_j\). Fix block-diagonal boundary conditions \(X_j\). Suppose that, for every \(j\), \(\Gamma _N^{A_j}(\mu _j^N X_j)\in \mathcal G_{N,L}(A_j)\). Then
Let \(B=\bigoplus _{j=0}^{r-1}\mu _jA_j\), where \(\mu _j\ne 0\). Suppose that, for every \(N{\gt}L\), \(G_L^{(N)}(B) =\bigvee _{j=0}^{r-1}\operatorname{span}\{ V^{(N)}(A_j)\} \). Then the source parent-Hamiltonian spanning equation holds: \(\ker H_N(B,L) =\operatorname{span}\{ V^{(N)}(A_j):j=0,\ldots ,r-1\} \). It is enough to prove the two equations
Let \(S\) be a family of virtual matrices. If each sector projection satisfies \(P_j\in \operatorname{span}S\) and a boundary matrix \(X\) commutes with every \(M\) in \(S\), so that \(XM=MX\), then \(XP_j=P_jX\) for every sector \(j\), and hence \(P_jXP_k=0\) for distinct sectors \(j\) and \(k\). Thus \(X\) is block diagonal with respect to the sector decomposition.
Let \(B=\bigoplus _{j=0}^{r-1}\mu _jA_j\). Suppose \(N{\gt}0\), \(L\le N\), and the periodic chain constraints for \(B\) split into the block constraints:
If every block chain space is contained in its periodic MPS line,
then the zero-energy space of the parent Hamiltonian is contained in the BNT vector span:
Let \(B=\bigoplus _{j=0}^{r-1}\mu _jA_j\), with every \(\mu _j\ne 0\). Suppose the physical alphabet and all block dimensions are nonempty. Assume that the block family is irreducible, left-canonical, has normalized self-overlap, and has no two blocks gauge-phase equivalent. Suppose also that each \(A_j\) is \(L_0\)-block-injective, that \(L_0{\gt}0\), and that \(\sum _a A^j_a(A^j_a)^\dagger =I \qquad (0\le j{\lt}r)\). Let \(N{\gt}0\), \(L{\gt}0\), \(L\le N\), \(L+L_0\le N\), and \((L_0+1) +(r-1)((L_0+1)+((L_0+1)+(L_0+1)))+1 \le L\). Assume that, for every boundary-crossing interval beginning at \(i\), the simultaneous products \(w\longmapsto (A^1_w,\ldots ,A^r_w), \qquad |w|=N-i\), span the product algebra \(\prod _jM_{D_j}(\mathbb {C})\). If every block chain space is contained in its periodic MPS line,
then
Let \(B=\bigoplus _{j=0}^{r-1}\mu _jA_j\), with every \(\mu _j\ne 0\). Suppose the physical alphabet and all block dimensions are nonempty. Assume that the block family is irreducible, left-canonical, has normalized self-overlap, and has no two blocks gauge-phase equivalent. Suppose also that each \(A_j\) is \(L_0\)-block-injective, that \(L_0{\gt}0\), and that \(\sum _a A^j_a(A^j_a)^\dagger =I \qquad (0\le j{\lt}r)\). Let \(N{\gt}0\), \(L{\gt}0\), \(L\le N\), \(L+L_0\le N\), and \((L_0+1) +(r-1)((L_0+1)+((L_0+1)+(L_0+1)))+1 \le L\). Assume the opened-boundary \(C^j,D^j\) comparison: whenever \(\psi \in \mathcal G_{N,L}(B)\) and \(\psi =\Gamma _N^B(\bigoplus _j X_j)\), there are matrices \(C^j_{i,\rho }\) such that, for every boundary-crossing interval \(i\), every \(\rho \), and every \(\beta \), \(A^j_\beta C^j_{i,\rho } =((\mu _j^N X_j)A^j_\beta )A^j_\rho \). If every block chain space is contained in its periodic MPS line,
then
Let \(B=\bigoplus _j\mu _jA^j\), and assume \(\mu _j\ne 0\) for every block \(j\). Suppose
Assume also that the length-\(m\) simultaneous word tuples span the product algebra. Then, for every outside configuration \(\tau \), with \(\rho =\tau _{m+1}\cdots \tau _{M-1}\), there are matrices \(E_j\) such that \(A^j_b(A^j_\rho A^j_a(\mu _j^{M+1}X_j)) = A^j_bE_jA^j_a\) for every block \(j\) and all boundary letters \(a,b\).
In the setting of Lemma 15.3.1.13, assume that the length-\(m\) simultaneous word tuples span the product algebra and that
Then there are matrices \(E_j\) such that, for every block \(j\) and all boundary letters \(a,b\),
Let \(B=\bigoplus _j\mu _jA^j\), and assume \(\mu _j\ne 0\) for every block \(j\). Suppose
If the length-\(m\) simultaneous word tuples span the product algebra, then for every outside configuration \(\tau \) and every block \(j\),
In the setting of Lemma 15.3.1.13, assume that the length-\(m\) simultaneous word tuples span the product algebra and that
Then, for every block \(j\),
Write \(N=M+1\) and let the local length be \(m+2\le M+1\). Consider the cyclic interval beginning at the last site \(M\). For an outside configuration \(\tau \), put
Then the \(j\)-th component of the last crossing-window restriction has the left-boundary trace form
Write \(N=M+1\) and let the local length be \(m+2\le M+1\). Consider the cyclic interval beginning at the last site \(M\). For an outside configuration \(\tau \), put
Then the block sum of the last crossing-window restrictions has the left-boundary trace form
Let \(B=\bigoplus _{j=0}^{r-1}\mu _jA_j\), with every \(\mu _j\ne 0\). Then, for every \(N{\gt}L\), the source parent-Hamiltonian spanning condition \(\ker H_L^{(N)}(B) =\operatorname{span}\{ V^{(N)}(A_j):j=0,\ldots ,r-1\} \) is equivalent to the reverse containment, for the same \(N\):
In the nearest-neighbor case \(L=2\), the all-chain source condition of Definition 14.1.17 is equivalent to the conjunction
Let \(B=\bigoplus _{j=1}^g\mu _jA_j\), where \(\mu _j\ne 0\) for \(1\le j\le g\), and set \(S_M:=\bigvee _{j=1}^gG_M(A_j)\). If, for every \(M\ge L\), \(\mathbb {C}^d\otimes S_M\cap S_M\otimes \mathbb {C}^d =S_{M+1}\), then \(\mathcal G_{N,L}(B)\subseteq S_N\).
Let \((B_k)_k\) be a family of tensors and let \(\bigoplus _k B_k\) be their direct sum on the total bond space. For every bond matrix \(X\) and every pair of blocks, the \((j,j')\) bond block of the transfer sum
equals \(\mathcal{E}_{j,j'}\) applied to the \((j,j')\) bond block of \(X\).
Let \(A\) be an MPS tensor and let \(L_0,K\ge 0\). Let \(X\) be a matrix, and let \(Y_{c_b}\) be a matrix for each iterated block index \(c_b\) of the complement. Suppose that, for every block letter \(b\) of the alphabet \(\{ 0,\ldots ,d{-}1\} ^{L_0}\) and every iterated block index \(c_b\) of the complement, with \(w(b)\) the length-\(L_0\) word of \(b\) and \(\widetilde{w(c_b)}\) the length-\(L_0K\) complement word obtained by concatenating the blocks of \(c_b\), \(X A^{w(b)} A^{\widetilde{w(c_b)}} = A^{w(b)} Y_{c_b}\). Then there is a family \(Y'_c\), indexed by the length-\(L_0K\) words \(c\), with \(X A^s A^c = A^s Y'_c\) for every length-\(L_0\) word \(s\) and every length-\(L_0K\) word \(c\).
Let \(A^1,\ldots ,A^g\) be block tensors whose length-\(m\) simultaneous word tuples span the product algebra. If, for every word \(w\) of length \(m\), two blockwise matrix families \(X_j\) and \(Y_j\) satisfy \(\sum _j\operatorname{tr}(X_jA^j_w) = \sum _j\operatorname{tr}(Y_jA^j_w)\), then \(X_j=Y_j\) for every block \(j\).
Let \(T_a=(T_a(i))_i\) be a family of tuples spanning the full product algebra \(\prod _i M_{n_i}(\mathbb {C})\), and let \(c_i\neq 0\) be nonzero scalars. Then, for every sector \(k\), the sector projection \(P_k\) lies in the span of the scaled dependent block-diagonal matrices \(\bigoplus _i c_i T_a(i)\).
If the simultaneous length-\(m\) block-word tuples \(\omega \mapsto (A_j^\omega )_j\) span the full product algebra \(\prod _j M_{D_j}(\mathbb {C})\) and every \(\mu _j\) is nonzero, then the pulled-back length-\(m\) word products of \(\bigoplus _j\mu _j A_j\) span every virtual sector projection \(P_j\). If a virtual matrix \(X\) commutes with the pulled-back word product for every word \(\omega \) of length \(m\),
then \(P_jXP_k=0\) for distinct sectors \(j\) and \(k\).
Under the hypotheses of Lemma 15.2.1.16, set \(S_n:=\bigvee _jG_{n+1}(A^j)\). Then
Under the hypotheses of Lemma 15.2.1.16, an \((n+2)\)-site vector satisfies \(\psi \in \bigvee _jG_{n+2}(A^j)\) if and only if
for every physical index \(a,b\).
Let \(A^1,\ldots ,A^g\) be block tensors with common word-span separation at length \(n\), and suppose that \(\sum _a A^j_aA^{j\, \dagger }_a=\mathbb {1}\) for every block \(j\). If \(\psi \in (\mathbb {C}^d)^{\otimes (n+2)}\) satisfies
for every physical index \(a,b\), then \(\psi \in \bigvee _jG_{n+2}(A^j)\).
If every ordered pair of distinct blocks admits a common-length pairwise block-separating equation, then for each \(k\) there are coefficients \(c_\omega ^{(k)}\) with
Hence common block injectivity plus pairwise separation implies the finite-length blockwise physical–virtual correspondence of the block-injectivity proposition in [ CPGSV16 , Section 2.3 ] and the block-injective canonical-form trace-separation condition.
- MPSTensor.pointwise_mul_mem_span_wordTuple_add
- MPSTensor.HasBlockSelectorOn.mul
- MPSTensor.hasBlockSelectorOn_finset_of_pairBlockSeparatingWords
- MPSTensor.hasBlockSelectorWords_of_forall_hasBlockSelectorOn_univ_erase
- MPSTensor.hasBlockSelectorWords_of_pairBlockSeparatingWords
- MPSTensor.propBlockInjective_of_common_blockInjective_of_pairBlockSeparatingWords
- MPSTensor.wordTupleSpanTop_of_common_blockInjective_of_pairBlockSeparatingWords
- MPSTensor.hasBiCF_of_common_blockInjective_of_pairBlockSeparatingWords
Let \(A\) be left-canonical, tensor-irreducible, and have primitive transfer map. Then \(A\) has primitive fixed-point data \((\rho ,P_\rho ,N)\) with \(\rho {\gt}0\) and \(N^n\to 0\). For every blocking length \(P\), the tensor \(A^{[P]}\) is left-canonical, its transfer map is \(\mathcal{E}_A^P\), and \(\rho \) is fixed by this blocked map. For every \(n\ge 1\),
Finally, a channel with a positive-definite fixed point whose positive semidefinite fixed points are all proportional is irreducible as a map; irreducibility of a transfer map implies tensor irreducibility.
- MPSTensor.hasPrimitiveFixedPoint_of_peripheralPrimitive_of_irreducible
- MPSTensor.posDef_of_isIrreducibleTensor_of_isPrimitiveMPS
- MPSTensor.leftCanonical_blockTensor
- MPSTensor.transferMap_blockTensor
- MPSTensor.transferMap_blockTensor_fixedPoint
- isIrreducibleMap_of_channel_posDef_fixedPoint_unique
- MPSTensor.isIrreducibleTensor_of_isIrreducibleMap
If the blocked tensor \(A^{[L]}\) satisfies \(S_n(A^{[L]})=M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), then \(S_{nL}(A)=M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\). In particular, \(A\) is \(L\)-block injective if and only if \(A^{[L]}\) is one-site injective.
Let \(A^1,\ldots ,A^g\) be block tensors with the following common word-span property: for a fixed \(m\), the simultaneous tuples \(w \longmapsto \left(A^1_w,\ldots ,A^g_w\right), \qquad |w|=m\), span the full product algebra \(\prod _j M_{D_j}(\mathbb {C})\). Suppose that matrices \(C^j_a,D^j_b\in M_{D_j}(\mathbb {C})\) satisfy, for all physical indices \(a,b\) and all words \(w\) of length \(m\),
Then \(A^j_bC^j_a = D^j_bA^j_a\) for every block \(j\) and all \(a,b\).
Let \(A^1,\ldots ,A^g\) be block tensors whose length-\(m\) simultaneous word tuples span the product algebra. Let \(C^j_a\in M_{D_j}(\mathbb {C})\) be matrices indexed by blocks \(j\) and physical letters \(a\). Suppose that, for every pair of boundary letters \(a,b\) and every word \(w\) of length \(m\), a vector \(\psi \) has the left-boundary trace form \(\psi (a,w,b) = \sum _j\operatorname{tr}\! \left(A^j_b C^j_a A^j_w\right)\). If \(\psi \in \bigvee _j G_{m+2}(A^j)\), then there are matrices \(E_j\) such that, for every block \(j\) and all \(a,b\), \(A^j_bC^j_a = A^j_bE_jA^j_a\).
Let \(\bigoplus _k \mu _k A_k\) be a block-diagonal tensor whose blocks are injective, left-canonical, weighted by nonzero scalars, and jointly block-injective in the sense that for some blocking length \(L\) the tuple of trace pairings against length-\(L\) block words is faithful across all blocks simultaneously. For \(Y\in M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\), write
for the physical-index insertion of \(Y\) into block \(A_k\), and for a configuration \(\sigma =(i_1,\ldots ,i_N)\) write
for \(Y\) acting on the first physical index of the MPV. If \(Y,Z\in M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\) satisfy \(Y_1V^{(N)}(A)=Z_1V^{(N)}(A)\) for every \(N\geq 1\), then \(YA_k=ZA_k\) for every block \(k\).
Scope restriction (per-block separation). The source’s Lemma L separates blockwise contributions at the level of a minimal basis of normal tensors, grouping gauge-equivalent copies of one representative before the trace-separation step; the block-injective hypothesis stated here instead demands trace separation simultaneously across every block, including gauge-equivalent copies, and so excludes decompositions with repeated normal tensors. Documented in docs/paper-gaps/cpgsv17_bicf_block_separation.tex.
Let \(A^1,\ldots ,A^g\) be block tensors with the common word-span property at length \(m\). Suppose that \(C^j_\rho \in M_{D_j}(\mathbb {C})\) is indexed by a block \(j\) and a word \(\rho \) of some fixed length \(M\), and that \(D^j_\beta \in M_{D_j}(\mathbb {C})\) is indexed by a block \(j\) and a word \(\beta \) of some fixed length \(K\). If, for every word \(\rho \) of length \(M\), every word \(\beta \) of length \(K\), and every middle word \(w\) of length \(m\),
then \(A^j_\beta C^j_\rho = D^j_\beta A^j_\rho \) for every block \(j\) and all words \(\beta ,\rho \). In particular, taking \(D^j_\beta =X_jA^j_\beta \) gives \(A^j_\beta C^j_\rho = (X_jA^j_\beta )A^j_\rho \).
Let \(A_1,\ldots ,A_g\) be normalized representatives of a basis of normal tensors: each representative is irreducible, the family is left-canonical, the self-overlaps are normalized, and no two distinct same-dimensional representatives are gauge-phase equivalent, and let \(B=\bigoplus _{j=1}^g\mu _jA_j\), where \(\mu _j\ne 0\). Assume each block is injective at length \(L_0\), assume \(\sum _aA^j_aA^{j\dagger }_a=\mathbb {1}\) for every \(j\), and suppose
If every vector \(\psi \in \mathcal G_{N,L}(B)\) can be written as
then \(\mathcal G_{N,L}(B) = \bigvee _{j=1}^g\mathcal G_{N,L}(A_j)\), and the sum \(\bigvee _jG_N(A_j)\) is internal.
With the hypotheses and notation of Lemma 15.3.7, suppose every vector \(\psi \in \mathcal G_{N,L}(B)\) has block-diagonal boundary conditions \(X_j\) such that \(\psi = \Gamma _N^B\! \left(\bigoplus _{j=1}^gX_j\right)\), and, for every \(j\), \(\Gamma _N^{A_j}(\mu _j^N X_j)\in \mathcal G_{N,L}(A_j)\). Then \(\mathcal G_{N,L}(B) = \bigvee _{j=1}^g\mathcal G_{N,L}(A_j)\), and the sum defining \(\bigvee _jG_N(A_j)\) is internal.
With the hypotheses and notation of Lemma 15.3.2.6, assume in addition that \(L+L_0\le N\). Assume further that, for every \(\psi \in \mathcal G_{N,L}\! \left(\bigoplus _j\mu _jA_j\right)\) and every block-diagonal boundary representation
the complementary-word matrix identities hold: for every block \(j\), boundary-crossing interval \(i\), word \(\beta \) before the cut, and outside word \(\rho \) of length \(N-L\), there is a matrix \(E_{j,i,\rho }\) such that \(\mu _j^N X_jA^j_\beta A^j_\rho = A^j_\beta E_{j,i,\rho }\). Then
and the \(N\)-site ground spaces \(G_N(A_j)=\mathcal G_{N,N}(A_j)\) have internal sum.
With the hypotheses and notation of Lemma 15.3.2.6, assume in addition that \(L+L_0\le N\). Assume also that, for every boundary-crossing interval beginning at \(i\), the simultaneous products
span the product algebra \(\prod _jM_{D_j}(\mathbb {C})\). Then
and the \(N\)-site ground spaces \(G_N(A_j)=\mathcal G_{N,N}(A_j)\) have internal sum. The present statement is the span-dependent consequence, after opening the boundary, of the \(C^j,D^j\) compatibility input in [ PGVWC07 , Theorem 12, proof lines 1436–1451 ] in the length-\(L_0\) injectivity range \(L \ge (L_0+1)+3(g-1)(L_0+1)+1\). The source theorem has the shorter bound \(L \ge 3(g-1)(L_0+1)+1\).
With the hypotheses and notation of Lemma 15.3.2.10, one has
This records the ground-space equality conclusion of the conditional crossing-span version above. It is the corresponding part of [ PGVWC07 , Theorem 12 ] , but only under the visible tail-word span hypothesis and in the longer stated range. The independence of the \(N\)-site spaces is a separate conclusion of Lemma 15.3.2.10. Thus the statement remains conditional on the short tail-word spans; it is not the unconditional boundary-condition comparison in the source theorem.
With the hypotheses and notation of Lemma 15.3.7, every vector \(\psi \in \mathcal G_{N,L}(\bigoplus _{j=1}^g\mu _jA_j)\) has a unique family \((\psi _j)_{j=1}^g\) such that
With the hypotheses and notation of Lemma 15.3.7, every vector \(\psi \in \mathcal G_{N,L}(\bigoplus _{j=1}^g\mu _jA_j)\) admits block-diagonal boundary conditions \(X_j\) such that
for every \(j\).
Let \(g\ge 2\). Let \(A_j\) be irreducible left-canonical blocks with normalized self-overlap, pairwise inequivalent up to gauge and phase, injective at the common length \(L_0{\gt}0\), and satisfying \(\sum _aA^j_aA^{j\, \dagger }_a=\mathbb {1}\). Let every weight \(\mu _j\) be nonzero. If \(0{\lt}L\le N\) and \(L\ge 3(g-1)(L_0+1)+1\), then
In particular, every vector \(\psi \) in the left-hand side admits matrices \(X_j\) such that
This is the open-boundary decomposition used in [ PGVWC07 , Theorem 12, proof lines 1424–1456 ] .
With the hypotheses and notation of Lemma 15.3.7, one has
and the sum defining the right-hand side is internal.
With the hypotheses and notation of Lemma 15.3.7, set \(S_N:=\bigvee _{j=1}^gG_N(A_j)\). Then, for every \(N\ge L\), \(\mathcal G_{N,L}(B)\subseteq S_N\), and the sum defining \(S_N\) is internal: if
then \(\phi _j=0\) for every \(j\).
Let \(A_1,\ldots ,A_g\) be normalized representatives of a basis of normal tensors: each representative is irreducible, the family is left-canonical, the self-overlaps are normalized, and no two distinct same-dimensional representatives are gauge-phase equivalent. Suppose \(L_0{\gt}0\), and, for every block \(j\), the map
is injective. Assume also the normalization \(\sum _a A^j_aA^{j\, \dagger }_a=\mathbb {1}\). For nonzero scalars \(\mu _j\), set
If \(L\ge (L_0+1)+(g-1)3(L_0+1)+1\), then, for every \(N\ge L\), \(\mathcal G_{N,L}(B)\subseteq S_N\).
With the hypotheses and notation of Lemma 15.3.2.6, assume in addition that \(L+L_0\le N\). Assume further that, for every \(\psi \in \mathcal G_{N,L}\! \left(\bigoplus _j\mu _jA_j\right)\) and every block-diagonal boundary representation
there are matrices \(C^j_{i,\rho }\) such that, for every boundary-crossing interval \(i\), every outside word \(\rho \) of length \(N-L\), and every word \(\beta \) before the cut, \(A^j_\beta C^j_{i,\rho } = ((\mu _j^N X_j)A^j_\beta )A^j_\rho \). This is the \(C^j,D^j\) compatibility input; the subsequent normalized \(E^j\) identities follow from Lemma 15.2.1.10. Then
and the \(N\)-site ground spaces \(G_N(A_j)=\mathcal G_{N,N}(A_j)\) have internal sum.
With the hypotheses and notation of Lemma 15.3.2.8, one has
This records only the ground-space equality conclusion obtained after the \(C^j,D^j\) boundary-condition comparison input in [ PGVWC07 , Theorem 12, proof lines 1446–1456 ] ; the local normalized \(E^j\) calculation is Lemma 15.2.1.10. The independence of the \(N\)-site spaces is a separate conclusion of Lemma 15.3.2.8. The statement is still in the length-\(L_0\) injectivity range displayed in that lemma, not the shorter range in [ PGVWC07 , Theorem 12 ] .
With the hypotheses and notation of Lemma 15.3.2.6, assume in addition that \(L+L_0\le N\) and \(L \ge (L_0+1)+(g-1)((L_0+1)+((L_0+1)+(L_0+1)))+1\). Put \(m = (L_0+1)+(g-1)((L_0+1)+((L_0+1)+(L_0+1)))\). Assume that, for every \(\psi \in \mathcal G_{N,L}\! \left(\bigoplus _j\mu _jA_j\right)\) and every block-diagonal boundary representation
there are matrices \(C^j_{i,\rho }\) such that, for every boundary-crossing interval \(i\), every outside word \(\rho \) of length \(N-L\), every word \(\beta \) before the cut, and every word \(w\) of length \(m\),
Then
and the \(N\)-site ground spaces \(G_N(A_j)=\mathcal G_{N,N}(A_j)\) have internal sum.
With the hypotheses and notation of Lemma 15.3.2.6, assume in addition that \(L+L_0\le N\). Assume also that, for some middle-word length \(m\), the simultaneous tuples \(w\mapsto (A^1_w,\ldots ,A^g_w)\), where \(w\) ranges over words of length \(m\) in \(\{ 0,\ldots ,d{-}1\} \), span the full product algebra \(\prod _jM_{D_j}(\mathbb {C})\). Assume further that, for every \(\psi \in \mathcal G_{N,L}\! \left(\bigoplus _j\mu _jA_j\right)\) and every block-diagonal boundary representation
there are matrices \(C^j_{i,\rho }\) such that, for every boundary-crossing interval \(i\), every outside word \(\rho \) of length \(N-L\), every word \(\beta \) before the cut, and every word \(w\) of length \(m\),
Then
and the \(N\)-site ground spaces \(G_N(A_j)=\mathcal G_{N,N}(A_j)\) have internal sum.
Under the hypotheses of Lemma 10.3.2, assume in addition the normalization \(\sum _a A^j_aA^{j\, \dagger }_a=\mathbb {1}\) for every block \(j\). Let
Then
Let \(A^1,\ldots ,A^r\) be normalized representatives of a basis of normal tensors: each representative is irreducible, the family is left-canonical, the self-overlaps are normalized, and no two distinct same-dimensional representatives are gauge-phase equivalent. Assume \(L{\gt}1\), and assume that, for every block \(j\),
Set \(S=3L\) and \(q=(r-1)S\). Suppose that \(p{\gt}0\) and let \(s_0\) be a starting length. Assume that, for every block \(j\), \(\operatorname{span}\{ A^j_u:|u|=p\} =M_{D_j}(\mathbb {C})\), and that, for every \(0\le s{\lt}p+q\) and every block \(j\), \(\operatorname{span}\{ A^j_v:|v|=s_0+s\} =M_{D_j}(\mathbb {C})\). Assume also the normalization \(\sum _a A^j_aA^{j\, \dagger }_a=\mathbb {1}\) for every block \(j\). Then there is \(N\) such that, for every \(n\ge N\), if \(S_n:=\bigvee _jG_{n+1}(A^j)\), then
Let \((A_j)_{j=1}^g\) be irreducible left-canonical tensors with normalized self-overlaps and with no gauge-phase-equivalent distinct blocks. Suppose \(g\geq 2\), \(L_0{\gt}0\), and every \(A_j\) is block-injective at lengths \(L_0\), \(L_0+1\), and \(3(L_0+1)\). Then
This is the direct-sum induction length in [ PGVWC07 , lines 1346–1408 ] .
Let \(A^1,\ldots ,A^r\) be irreducible left-canonical representatives with normalized self-overlaps, and suppose that distinct same-dimensional representatives are not gauge-phase equivalent. Fix \(L_0{\gt}0\) such that every block is injective at lengths \(L_0\), \(L_0+1\), and \(3(L_0+1)\). Then each ordered pair \(k\ne j\) is trace-separated at the common length \(S=3(L_0+1)\): the map
is onto \(M_{D_k}(\mathbb {C})\oplus M_{D_j}(\mathbb {C})\). In particular, one may prescribe an arbitrary matrix on either block while making the same word combination vanish on the other block.
Let \(A^1,\ldots ,A^r\) be normalized representatives of a basis of normal tensors: each representative is irreducible, the family is left-canonical, the self-overlaps are normalized, and no two distinct same-dimensional representatives are gauge-phase equivalent. Suppose \(L_0{\gt}0\), and, for every block \(j\), the map
is injective. Assume also the normalization \(\sum _a A^j_aA^{j\, \dagger }_a=\mathbb {1}\). Then there is a length \(N\) such that, for every \(n\ge N\), with \(S_n:=\bigvee _jG_{n+1}(A^j)\), one has
Let \(A^1,\ldots ,A^r\) be normalized representatives of a basis of normal tensors: each representative is irreducible, the family is left-canonical, the self-overlaps are normalized, and no two distinct same-dimensional representatives are gauge-phase equivalent. Suppose \(L_0{\gt}0\), and, for every block \(j\), the map
is injective. Assume also the normalization \(\sum _a A^j_aA^{j\, \dagger }_a=\mathbb {1}\). Set \(N=(L_0+1)+(r-1)3(L_0+1)\). For every \(n\ge N\), set \(S_n:=\bigvee _jG_{n+1}(A^j)\). The two consecutive sums are internal direct sums:
With this notation,
If two finite families of blocks have asymptotically orthonormal overlaps within each family and their MPV spans agree for every system size \(N\), then for all sufficiently large \(N\) there exists an invertible matrix \(U_N\) expressing the MPV states of one family as linear combinations of the MPV states of the other.
Let \(I\) be a finite index set and let \((A_i)_{i \in I}\) be a finite family of tensors such that \(O_{A_iA_i}(N) \to 1\) for each \(i\), and \(O_{A_iA_j}(N) \to 0\) whenever \(i \neq j\). Then the MPV states \(\{ |V^{(N)}(A_i)\rangle \} _{i \in I}\) are linearly independent for all sufficiently large \(N\).
Let \(v_1, \ldots , v_g\) and \(w_1, \ldots , w_g\) be two linearly independent families in a complex vector space with the same span. Then there exists an invertible matrix \(U \in \mathrm{GL}_g(\mathbb {C})\) such that \(w_j = \sum _{i=1}^g U_{ij} v_i\) for every \(j\).
If \(1{\lt}L\) and \(N\ge L+1\), then for each normal tensor \(A_j\) in the basis, the vector \(V^{(N)}(A_j)\) lies in \(\mathcal G_{N,L}(\bigoplus _k \mu _k A_k)\).
Let \((A_j)_{j=1}^g\) be a finite family of tensors such that \(O_{A_jA_j}(N) \to 1\) for each \(j\) and \(O_{A_iA_j}(N) \to 0\) for \(i \neq j\). Then the MPV states \(\{ |V^{(N)}(A_j)\rangle \} _{j=1}^g\) are linearly independent for all sufficiently large \(N\).
Let \((A_j)_{j=1}^{g_A}\) and \((B_k)_{k=1}^{g_B}\) be two families of injective tensors of positive bond dimension satisfying the TP normalization \(\sum _i (A_j^i)^\dagger A_j^i = \mathbb {1}\) and \(\sum _i (B_k^i)^\dagger B_k^i = \mathbb {1}\), whose self-overlaps converge to \(1\) and whose cross-overlaps within each family converge to \(0\). If for every system size \(N\),
then \(g_A = g_B\), and there is a permutation \(\pi \) of the common block index set such that \(A_j\) and \(B_{\pi (j)}\) have the same bond dimension and are gauge-phase equivalent for each \(j\).
Let \(B\) be a canonical-form tensor with BNT components \(A_1,\ldots ,A_g\). If every component vector has zero energy for the parent Hamiltonian, \(H_L^{(N)}(B)V^{(N)}(A_j)=0\) for \(1\le j\le g\), then
It is enough to assume the local frustration-free equations \(h_iV^{(N)}(A_j)=0\) for every \(i\) and \(j\). For \(N{\gt}0\) and \(L\le N\), in the block-diagonal case \(B=\bigoplus _j\mu _jA_j\), with every \(\mu _j\ne 0\), the same inclusion follows because each local space \(G_L(A_j)\) is contained in \(G_L(B)\). This is the easy inclusion in the source ground-space spanning equation of [ CPGSV16 , Definition 3.9 ] ; the reverse inclusion is the remaining spanning direction.
Let \((A_j)_{j=1}^{g_A}\) and \((B_k)_{k=1}^{g_B}\) be finite families of tensors. Suppose the overlaps inside each family are asymptotically orthonormal, and suppose every mixed overlap \(O_{A_jB_k}(N)\) tends to \(0\). Then the combined MPV family
is linearly independent for all sufficiently large \(N\).
Let \(A\) be \(L_0\)-block-injective, with \(L_0{\gt}0\), and let \(L_0\le M\). Suppose two length-\((L_0+1)\) restrictions of a state \(\psi \) at the same cyclic support are represented by \(\operatorname{Res}^\rho _{i,L_0+1}\psi =\Gamma _{L_0+1}(Y_\rho )\) and \(\operatorname{Res}^\tau _{i,L_0+1}\psi =\Gamma _{L_0+1}(Y_\tau )\). If these two restrictions are equal, then \(Y_\rho A^j=Y_\tau A^j\) for every physical letter \(j\). In particular, the last-site boundary-crossing condition and the second boundary-crossing condition satisfy, respectively,
Consequently, for every word \(\sigma \) of length \(L_0\), both implications remain true after right multiplication by \(A^\sigma \).
- MPSTensor.cyclicRestrictₗ_first_products_eq_of_restriction_eq
- MPSTensor.cyclicRestrictₗ_wrappedMiddleBackground_eq_of_complement_eq
- MPSTensor.cyclicRestrictₗ_mirrorMiddleBackground_eq_of_complement_eq
- MPSTensor.wrappedMiddleBackground_first_products_eq_of_complement_eq
- MPSTensor.mirrorMiddleBackground_first_products_eq_of_complement_eq
- MPSTensor.wrappedMiddleBackground_first_products_eq_of_complement_eq_right_word
- MPSTensor.mirrorMiddleBackground_first_products_eq_of_complement_eq_right_word
Let \(A\) be \(L_0\)-block-injective with \(L_0{\gt}0\), and let \(L_0\le M\). Let \(\psi \) be a state on the chain of length \(M+1\). Suppose that matrices \(Y_r(\rho )\), for \(0\le r\le L_0-1\), represent the length-\((L_0+1)\) cyclic restrictions beginning at the sites \(M+1-L_0+r\): \(\operatorname{Res}^\rho _{M+1-L_0+r,L_0+1}\psi =\Gamma _{L_0+1}(Y_r(\rho ))\). Then
For \(L_0=1\), both products are empty.
Let \(A\) be \(L_0\)-block-injective, with \(L_0{\gt}0\), and let \(L_0\le M\). Let \(\psi \) be a state on the chain of length \(M+1\), and let the matrices \(Y_i(\tau )\) represent its length-\((L_0+1)\) cyclic restrictions, \(\operatorname{Res}^\tau _{i,L_0+1}(\psi )=\Gamma _{L_0+1}(Y_i(\tau ))\). Fix a boundary letter \(\eta \) and a complementary word \(\mu \). Let \(\rho ^+\) and \(\rho ^-\) be two boundary conditions satisfying \(\rho ^+_{k+L_0}=\mu _k\) and \(\rho ^-_{k+1}=\mu _k\). If the adjacent-window comparison gives, for every physical letter \(j\) and every word \(\sigma \) of length \(L_0\), \(Y_M(\rho ^+)A^jA^\sigma =Y_{M+1-L_0}(\rho ^-)A^jA^\sigma \), then the same product equation holds for \(\tau ^+_\eta (\mu )\) and \(\tau ^-_\eta (\mu )\):
Let \(A\) be \(L_0\)-block-injective with \(L_0{\gt}0\). Let \(X\) be a boundary matrix, and let \(Y_v\) be a matrix for each complementary word \(v\) of length \(K\). Suppose that, for every word \(u\) of length \(L_0\) and every word \(v\) of length \(K\), \(X A^u A^v = A^u Y_v\). Then, for every physical letter \(j\), \(X A^j = A^j X\). This is the boundary-matrix commutation step obtained from the equations \(X A^u A^v=A^uY_v\), for all length-\(L_0\) words \(u\) and all length-\(K\) words \(v\), as in [ CPGSV21 , Section IV.C, lines 2049–2090 ] .
Let \(L_0{\gt}0\) and \(L_0\le M\), and set
With \(R_j\) as in Lemma 13.8.11,
Let \(A\) be \(L_0\)-block-injective with \(L_0{\gt}0\). Let \(X\) be a boundary matrix, let \(W_\eta \) and \(V_\eta \) be matrix families indexed by a physical letter \(\eta \), and let \(\mu \) be a word. Suppose that, for every physical letter \(j\), \(X A^j = A^jX\). Suppose also that, for every \(\eta \) and every \(j\),
Then, for every \(\eta \) and every \(j\), \(W_\eta A^j = V_\eta A^j\).
Let \(A\) be \(L_0\)-block-injective with \(L_0{\gt}0\) and \(D\ge 1\), and let \(L_0\le M\). Let \(\psi =\Gamma _{M+1}(X)\), and suppose that matrices \(Y_i(\rho )\) represent all length-\((L_0+1)\) cyclic restrictions of \(\psi \). Then, for every boundary condition \(\rho \) and every physical letter \(j\),
For \(\rho =\tau ^-_\eta (\mu )\), this is the transport identity supplied by the adjacent-window argument, with the single factor \(A^j\) following \(Y_{M+1-L_0}(\tau ^-_\eta (\mu ))\). The padded identity, whose corresponding factor is \(A^jA^\sigma \), is supplied separately.
If \(U\) is antisymmetric, \(U^{\mathsf T}=-U\), and a contraction, \(U^{\dagger }U\le \mathbb {1}\), then for every vector \(v\) the image \(T_{\mathrm{BH}}(|v\rangle \langle v|)\) of the rank-one operator \(|v\rangle \langle v|\) is positive semidefinite.
Suppose that, after a change of coordinates, \(A\) is the dependent direct sum of tensors \(B_k\). If \(A\) has invariant-projector closure and no nontrivial periodic vectors, then every \(B_k\) has both properties. The assertion also applies to summands of dimension zero.
Let \(E\) be a quantum channel, \(\rho \in \mathcal{D}_D\), and \(\psi :\mathbb {N}\to \mathbb {N}\) satisfy \(\psi (k)\to \infty \). If
then \(\sigma \in \mathcal{D}_D\) and \(E(\sigma )=\sigma \).
Let \((\mu _k, A_k)_{k=1}^r\) be a weighted block family. Assume each \(A_k\) is injective and left-canonical, \(\sum _i (A_k^i)^\dagger A_k^i = \mathbb {1}\), that \(O_{A_kA_k}(N) \to 1\) for each \(k\), and that distinct equal-dimension blocks are not gauge-phase equivalent. Then the blocks form a basis of normal tensors for the block-diagonal tensor \(\bigoplus _k \mu _k A_k\).
For each block index \(j\) with \(\mu _j\neq 0\), and whenever \(0{\lt}N\) and \(L\le N\), the periodic-boundary ground space of the block \(A_j\) embeds into the corresponding ground space of the direct-sum tensor:
If \(0{\lt}N\), \(L\le N\), and \(\psi \in \mathcal G_{N,L}(A)\), then, for every cyclic window and every outside configuration, there is a boundary matrix \(Y\) such that the corresponding restricted \(L\)-site state is \(\Gamma _L(Y)\).
Let \(A \in M_{m \times n}(\mathbb {C})\) and \(B \in M_{n \times m}(\mathbb {C})\). Then the charpoly-root entropy sum is invariant under the cyclic swap \(AB \mapsto BA\):
with roots counted with algebraic multiplicity.
For \(d=3\) and \(n=1\), every vector \(v=(v_0,v_1,v_2)\) satisfies \(T_C(|v\rangle \! \langle v|)\ge 0\). Equivalently, with \(x=|v_0|^2\), \(y=|v_1|^2\), and \(z=|v_2|^2\), the needed cyclic estimate is
The zero-denominator terms are read as \(0\), as in the preceding Schur-complement criterion. This is only the \(3\times 3\) rank-one subcase; the cyclic estimate for all \(1\le n\le d-2\) remains open.
Let \(x_i\ge 0\) be indexed by a finite set, let \(T=\sum _j x_j\), and let \(\sigma \) be a permutation of the index set. Then, with zero-denominator summands read as \(0\),
Let \(d\ge 3\) and \(n=d-2\). With \(x_i=|v_i|^2\) and \(T=\sum _j x_j\), the Choi rank-one diagonal weight equals
Let \(A\) be an MPS tensor, let \(L_0{\gt}0\), and let \(L_0\le M\). Suppose the two boundary-crossing restrictions of length \(L_0+1\) are represented by boundary matrices \(Y^+_{\eta ,\mu }\) and \(Y^-_{\eta ,\mu }\):
If, for every physical letter \(j\), \(Y^+_{\eta ,\mu }A^j = Y^-_{\eta ,\mu }A^j\), then \(B^+_{\eta ,\mu }(\psi ) = B^-_{\eta ,\mu }(\psi )\).
Let \(L_0{\gt}0\) and \(L_0\le M\). Let \(Y_i(\tau )\) represent the length-\((L_0+1)\) cyclic restrictions of \(\psi \). Fix a complementary word \(\mu \). If, for every boundary letter \(\eta \) and physical letter \(j\), \(Y_M(\tau ^+_\eta (\mu ))A^j = Y_{M+1-L_0}(\tau ^-_\eta (\mu ))A^j\), then, for every \(\eta \),
Let \(A\) be \(L_0\)-block-injective with \(L_0{\gt}0\), and let \(L_0\le M\). Let \(\psi \) be a state on the chain of length \(M+1\), and let \(Y_i(\tau )\) be matrices satisfying \(\operatorname{Res}^{\tau }_{i,L_0+1}(\psi )=\Gamma _{L_0+1}(Y_i(\tau ))\). Suppose that, for every outside letter \(\eta \),
Then there are boundary conditions \(\rho ^+_{j,\sigma }\) and \(\rho ^-_{j,\sigma }\) such that, for every complementary position \(k\),
and, for every physical letter \(j\) and every word \(\sigma \) of length \(L_0\),
Let \(A\) be \(L_0\)-block-injective with \(L_0{\gt}0\), and let \(L_0\le M\). Let \(\psi \) be a state on the chain of length \(M+1\), and let \(Y_i(\tau )\) be matrices satisfying \(\operatorname{Res}^{\tau }_{i,L_0+1}(\psi )=\Gamma _{L_0+1}(Y_i(\tau ))\). Fix a complementary word \(\mu \) and a matrix \(X\). Suppose that, for every boundary letter \(\eta \) and every physical letter \(j\), \(Y_M(\tau ^+_\eta (\mu ))A^j=A^\mu A^jX\). Suppose also that, for every \(\eta \), \(j\), and every pair of words \(\sigma ,\alpha \) of length \(L_0\),
Then there are boundary conditions \(\rho ^+_{j,\sigma }\) and \(\rho ^-_{j,\sigma }\) satisfying the complementary-word equations
and the product equation
Let \(A\) be \(L_0\)-block-injective with \(L_0{\gt}0\), and let \(L_0\le M\). Let \(\psi \) be a state on the chain of length \(M+1\), and let \(Y_i(\tau )\) be matrices satisfying \(\operatorname{Res}^{\tau }_{i,L_0+1}(\psi )=\Gamma _{L_0+1}(Y_i(\tau ))\). Fix a complementary word \(\mu \) and a matrix \(X\). Suppose that, for every boundary letter \(\eta \) and every physical letter \(j\), \(Y_M(\tau ^+_\eta (\mu ))A^j = A^\mu A^jX\). Suppose also that, for every \(\eta \), \(j\), and every word \(\sigma \) of length \(L_0\),
Then there are boundary conditions \(\rho ^+_{j,\sigma }\) and \(\rho ^-_{j,\sigma }\) such that, for every complementary position \(k\),
and, for every physical letter \(j\) and every word \(\sigma \) of length \(L_0\),
Let \(A\) be \(L_0\)-block-injective with \(L_0{\gt}0\), and let \(L_0\le M\). Let \(\psi \) be a state on the chain of length \(M+1\), and let \(Y_i(\tau )\) be matrices satisfying \(\operatorname{Res}^{\tau }_{i,L_0+1}(\psi )=\Gamma _{L_0+1}(Y_i(\tau ))\). Fix a complementary word \(\mu \) of length \(M+1-(L_0+1)\). Suppose that, for every boundary letter \(\eta \) and every physical letter \(j\), \(Y_M(\tau ^+_\eta (\mu ))A^j = Y_{M+1-L_0}(\tau ^-_\eta (\mu ))A^j\). Then there are boundary conditions \(\rho ^+_{j,\sigma }\) and \(\rho ^-_{j,\sigma }\) such that, for every complementary position \(k\),
and, for every physical letter \(j\) and every word \(\sigma \) of length \(L_0\),
Let \(A\) be \(L_0\)-block-injective with \(L_0{\gt}0\), \(L_0{\lt}M\), and \(D\ge 1\). Let \(\psi =\Gamma _{M+1}(X)\) and assume that every cyclic restriction of length \(L_0+1\) belongs to \(G_{L_0+1}(A)\). Then there are boundary matrices \(Y_\nu \), indexed by nonempty complementary words \(\nu \) of length \(M+1-(L_0+1)\), such that, for every word \(\alpha \) of length \(L_0\), \(X A^\alpha A^\nu = A^\alpha Y_\nu \).
Let \(A\) be a tensor with virtual dimension at least one whose single-site matrices span the full matrix algebra. Let \(L_0{\gt}0\) and \(L_0{\lt}M\), and let \(\psi =\Gamma _{M+1}(X)\). If every cyclic restriction of length \(L_0+1\) belongs to \(G_{L_0+1}(A)\), then there are boundary matrices \(Y_\nu \), indexed by nonempty complementary words \(\nu \) of length \(M+1-(L_0+1)\), such that, for every word \(\alpha \) of length \(L_0\), \(X A^\alpha A^\nu = A^\alpha Y_\nu \).
Let \(A\) be a tensor with virtual dimension at least one, and let \(L_0{\gt}0\) and \(L_0{\lt}M\). Let \(\psi =\Gamma _{M+1}(X)\) and assume that every cyclic restriction of length \(L_0+1\) belongs to \(G_{L_0+1}(A)\). Then there are boundary matrices \(Y_\nu \), indexed by nonempty complementary words \(\nu \) of length \(M+1-(L_0+1)\), such that, for every physical letter \(j\) and every word \(\alpha \) of length \(L_0\),
Let \(A\) be \(L_0\)-block-injective with \(L_0{\gt}0\), and let \(L_0\le M\). Let \(\psi \) be a state on the chain of length \(M+1\), and suppose matrices \(Y_i(\rho )\) represent the length-\((L_0+1)\) cyclic restrictions \(\operatorname{Res}^\rho _{i,L_0+1}(\psi )=\Gamma _{L_0+1}(Y_i(\rho ))\). Then, for every boundary condition \(\rho \),
Each side has \(M+2-L_0\) one-site factors, with site labels read modulo \(M+1\).
Let \(A\) be \(L_0\)-block-injective with \(L_0{\gt}0\), and let \(L_0\le M\). Let \(\psi \) be a state on the chain of length \(M+1\), and suppose matrices \(Y_i(\rho )\) represent the length-\((L_0+1)\) cyclic restrictions \(\operatorname{Res}^\rho _{i,L_0+1}(\psi )=\Gamma _{L_0+1}(Y_i(\rho ))\). Then, for every boundary condition \(\rho \),
For \(L_0=1\), both products are empty. The same equation remains true after multiplying both sides on the right by any matrix \(R\).
Let \(A\) be \(L_0\)-block-injective with \(L_0{\gt}0\), \(D\ge 1\), and \(L_0\le M\). Suppose \(\psi =\Gamma _{M+1}(X)\), and suppose matrices \(Y_i(\tau )\) represent the length-\((L_0+1)\) cyclic restrictions \(\operatorname{Res}^\tau _{i,L_0+1}(\psi )=\Gamma _{L_0+1}(Y_i(\tau ))\). Then, for every physical letter \(j\) and boundary condition \(\tau \),
Let \(A\) be \(L_0\)-block-injective with \(L_0{\gt}0\) and \(L_0\le M\). Let \(\psi \) be a vector on \(M+1\) sites, and suppose the two length-\((L_0+1)\) boundary restrictions are represented by \(\Gamma _{L_0+1}(Y_M(\tau ^+_\eta (\mu )))\) and \(\Gamma _{L_0+1}(Y_{M+1-L_0}(\tau ^-_\eta (\mu )))\). If these two restrictions are equal, then for every physical letter \(j\), \(Y_M(\tau ^+_\eta (\mu ))A^j = Y_{M+1-L_0}(\tau ^-_\eta (\mu ))A^j\). Thus the first-letter restriction of the preceding equality is precisely the displayed product equation.
Let \(A\) be \(L_0\)-block-injective with \(L_0{\gt}0\), \(D\ge 1\), and \(L_0\le M\). Suppose \(\psi =\Gamma _{M+1}(X)\), and suppose matrices \(Y_i(\tau )\) represent the length-\((L_0+1)\) cyclic restrictions \(\operatorname{Res}^\tau _{i,L_0+1}(\psi )=\Gamma _{L_0+1}(Y_i(\tau ))\). For every boundary letter \(\eta \), every physical letter \(j\), and every complementary word \(\mu \),
Let \(A\) be \(L_0\)-block-injective with \(L_0{\gt}0\) and \(D\ge 1\), let \(L_0{\lt}M\), and let
For every boundary letter \(\eta \) and complementary word \(\mu \), the two restrictions crossing the periodic cut satisfy
Let \(A\) be \(L_0\)-block-injective with \(L_0{\gt}0\) and \(D\ge 1\), let \(L_0{\lt}M\), and let \(\psi \in \mathcal G_{M+1,L_0+1}(A)\) with \(\psi =\Gamma _{M+1}(X)\). Let \(R_j\) denote restriction to the first physical letter \(j\). For every outside letter \(\eta \), complementary word \(\mu \), and physical letter \(j\), one has
This is the one-letter product form of the local comparison corresponding to [ CPGSV21 , lines 2078–2079 ] .
Let \(A\) be \(L_0\)-block-injective with \(L_0{\gt}0\), and let \(L_0\le M\). Fix a complementary word \(\mu \), a matrix \(X\), and a family of matrices \(Y_i(\tau )\). Suppose that, for every boundary letter \(\eta \), every physical letter \(j\), and every pair of words \(\sigma ,\alpha \) of length \(L_0\),
Then, for every \(\eta \), \(j\), and \(\sigma \),
Let \(A\) be \(L_0\)-block-injective with \(L_0{\gt}0\), and let \(L_0\le M\). Fix a complementary word \(\mu \), a matrix \(X\), and a family of matrices \(Y_i(\tau )\). Suppose that, for every boundary letter \(\eta \), every physical letter \(j\), and every word \(\sigma \) of length \(L_0\),
Then, for every \(\eta \) and \(j\), \(Y_{M+1-L_0}(\tau ^-_\eta (\mu ))A^j = A^\mu A^jX\).
Let \(A\) be \(L_0\)-block-injective with \(L_0{\gt}0\) and \(L_0\le M\). Let \(\psi \) be a vector on \(M+1\) sites, and let \(Y_i(\tau )\) represent the length-\((L_0+1)\) cyclic restrictions of \(\psi \). Assume that for every boundary letter \(\eta \),
Then for every boundary letter \(\eta \), physical letter \(j\), and length-\(L_0\) words \(\alpha ,\sigma \),
If \(\rho \) is a projective representation with factor system \(\omega \) and \(D {\gt} 0\), then \(\omega \) satisfies the 2-cocycle identity
Suppose CF summands are grouped by BNT representative, every original copy weight is nonzero, and every summand assigned to a representative has that representative’s bond dimension. Then the total bond dimension of the resulting BNT sector decomposition is the sum of the original block dimensions.
Suppose a single family of boundary matrices \(Y_\mu \), indexed by words \(\mu \) on the complementary sites, satisfies the two one-sided identities
for every pair of physical letters \(a,b\). Then \(X\) commutes with every word product \(A^aA^\mu A^b\) obtained by adjoining one letter on each side of the word \(A^\mu \).
Let \(s\subseteq \mathbb {C}\) be a finite set. Assume that for every \(\mu \in s\) there exists an exponent \(p_\mu {\gt}0\) with \(\mu ^{p_\mu }=1\). Then there exists \(p{\gt}0\) such that \(\mu ^p=1\) for all \(\mu \in s\).
Let \(L\le N\). Suppose that \(h_i h_j=h_j h_i\) whenever the length-\(L\) cyclic supports of the two local terms meet. Then the parent Hamiltonian has commuting local terms: \(h_i h_j=h_j h_i\) for all \(i,j\). In the case \(L=2\), this gives the nearest-neighbor commuting condition.
Let \(A_\beta \) be the products over wrapped words of length \(K\), let \(A_\rho \) be the products over complementary words of length \(M\), and let \(X\in M_D(\mathbb {C})\) be a matrix. Suppose that the complementary-word products satisfy \(\sum _\rho A_\rho A_\rho ^\dagger = \mathbb {1}\) and that there are matrices \(C_\rho \), indexed by complementary words, such that, for every wrapped word \(\beta \) and complementary word \(\rho \), \(A_\beta C_\rho = (X A_\beta )A_\rho \). Then, for every complementary word \(\rho \), with
one has, for every wrapped word \(\beta \), \((X A_\beta )A_\rho = A_\beta E_\rho \).
Let \(A^1,\ldots ,A^g\) be block tensors with the common word-span property at length \(m\). Fix matrices \(X_j\). Suppose that \(C^j_\rho \) is indexed by a block \(j\) and a complementary word \(\rho \) of length \(M\). Assume that, for every wrapped word \(\beta \) of length \(K\), every complementary word \(\rho \), and every middle word \(w\) of length \(m\),
If each block satisfies \(\sum _a A^j_aA^{j\, \dagger }_a = \mathbb {1}\), then, for every block \(j\) and every complementary word \(\rho \), there is a matrix \(E_{j,\rho }\) such that, for every wrapped word \(\beta \), \((X_jA^j_\beta )A^j_\rho = A^j_\beta E_{j,\rho }\).
For \(X\in M_{D,k}(\mathbb {C})(\mathbb {C})\), the vector
has Schmidt rank at most \(k\).
Let \(A^i=\bigoplus _j\mu _j A_j^i\) be in block-injective canonical form, with \(A_1,\ldots ,A_g\) a basis of normal tensors. Assume \(1{\lt}L\) and \(N\ge L+1\), and suppose that for each block \(k\) there are coefficients \(c_\omega ^{(k)}\) such that
If every vector in \(\mathcal G_{N,L}(\bigoplus _j \mu _j A_j)\) has a boundary matrix representation commuting with all length-\((1+S)\) direct-sum words, then
Together with the forward inclusion, this gives the corresponding conditional equality. In the parent-ground-space formulation, the same hypotheses imply containment in \(\operatorname{span}\{ V^{(N)}(A_j):j=1,\ldots ,g\} \). This is the block-injective ground-space argument of [ CPGSV21 , lines 2120–2128 ] , where the re-growing step is restricted to block-diagonal boundary conditions.
Let \(A^i=\bigoplus _j\mu _j A_j^i\) be in block-injective canonical form, and assume \(1{\lt}L\), \(N\ge L+1\), and \(0{\lt}m\). If
and every vector in \(\mathcal G_{N,L}(\bigoplus _j \mu _j A_j)\) comes with a boundary matrix representation commuting with all length-\(m\) direct-sum words, then
Combined with the forward inclusion, this gives the corresponding conditional equality. In the parent-ground-space formulation, the same hypotheses imply containment in \(\operatorname{span}\{ V^{(N)}(A_j):j=1,\ldots ,g\} \).
Let \(B^i=\bigoplus _j\mu _j A_j^i\), and assume \(1{\lt}L\), \(N\ge L+1\), and \(0{\lt}m\). Assume that every virtual sector projection \(P_j\) lies in the pulled-back span of the length-\(m\) words \(B^\omega \), and assume that every vector \(\psi \in \mathcal G_{N,L}(\bigoplus _j\mu _j A_j)\) has a boundary matrix \(X\) with
for the boundary-crossing words \(\omega \). Then
with equality after the forward inclusion. This is a conditional form of the block-diagonal boundary-condition step in [ CPGSV21 , lines 2126–2128 ] .
Let \(x_1,\ldots ,x_n\) be non-negative real numbers whose power sums \(\sum _k x_k^L\) take the same value at every exponent \(L \ge 1\). Then every \(x_k\) equals \(0\) or \(1\). The same holds for a finite family of complex numbers that are non-negative in the complex order. Nonnegativity cannot be dropped: the primitive cube roots of unity have power sums invariant under doubling the exponent, yet do not lie in \(\{ 0,1\} \).
Let \(T\) be irreducible, let \(P_0,\ldots ,P_{m-1}\) be orthogonal projections summing to \(\mathbb {1}\) and cyclically permuted by \(T\), and suppose that every orthogonal projection \(Q\) with \(QP_k=P_kQ=Q\) that is invariant under the corner restriction of \(T^m\) to \(P_kM_{D}(\mathbb {C})P_k\) admits an orthogonal projection \(R\) invariant under \(T\) on the full algebra with \(Q=0\iff R=0\) and \(Q=P_k\iff R=\mathbb {1}\). Then, for every \(k\), the restriction of \(T^m\) to the corner \(P_kM_{D}(\mathbb {C})P_k\) is irreducible.
If a cyclic \((L+1)\)-window is represented by a boundary matrix \(Y\), then deleting one endpoint gives
Hence two adjacent cyclic windows whose restrictions agree on the common length-\(L\) overlap have boundary matrices satisfying \(Y_1A^a=A^bY_2\). Consequently, for a finite chain of adjacent overlaps indexed by \(0\le r{\lt}n\), satisfying \(Y_rA^{a_r}=A^{b_r}Y_{r+1}\), one has \(Y_0A^{a_0}\cdots A^{a_{n-1}} = A^{b_0}\cdots A^{b_{n-1}}Y_n\). In particular, if the two endpoint words are named by the equations \(a_r=\rho (i_0+r)\) and \(b_r=\rho (i_0+r+L+1)\), with site labels read modulo \(N\), then the same transport identity is written as \(Y_0A^a=A^bY_n\).
- MPSTensor.cyclicRestrictₗ_restrictFirst_groundSpaceMap
- MPSTensor.cyclicRestrictₗ_restrictLast_groundSpaceMap
- MPSTensor.adjacent_cyclicRestrictₗ_witness_overlap
- MPSTensor.adjacent_cyclicRestrictₗ_witness_overlap_common_background
- MPSTensor.boundary_witness_product_of_adjacent_overlaps
- MPSTensor.adjacent_cyclicRestrictₗ_witness_product
- MPSTensor.adjacent_cyclicRestrictₗ_witness_product_common_background
- MPSTensor.adjacent_cyclicRestrictₗ_witness_product_common_background_named
If \(L\le N\) and the cyclic supports \(S_i\) and \(S_j\) do not meet, then the Hilbert-space local terms have non-negative ordered cross term: \(0\le \operatorname{Re}\langle h_{i,\mathrm{ES}}v,h_{j,\mathrm{ES}}v\rangle \).
On a nonempty periodic chain, longer cyclic-window constraints imply all shorter cyclic-window constraints: if \(L'\le L\le N\), then \(\mathcal G_{N,L}(A)\subseteq \mathcal G_{N,L'}(A)\).
Let \(f:\mathbb {R}\to \mathbb {R}\) be convex on \([0,\infty )\), let \(A\) be a positive semidefinite matrix on a finite-dimensional space indexed by \(n\), and let \(v\in \mathbb {C}^n\) satisfy \(\langle v,v\rangle =1\). Then
where \(f(A)\) is defined by the Hermitian continuous functional calculus.
Let \(\Phi :\mathcal A\simeq \mathcal B\) match the simple summands by an equivalence \(\sigma :I\simeq J\), with \(D_i=E_{\sigma (i)}\). Suppose that there are unitaries \(U_i\) satisfying \(\Phi (0,\ldots ,0,X,0,\ldots ,0)_{\sigma (i)} =U_i\iota _i(X)U_i^*\). Then \(\Phi \) preserves the total block trace.
For direct-sum Kraus maps \(T:\mathcal A\to \mathcal B\) and \(S:\mathcal B\to \mathcal C\), one has \(\widehat{S\circ T}=\widehat S\circ \widehat T\), and \(S\circ T\) is again a direct-sum Kraus map. If an endomorphism \(T:\mathcal A\to \mathcal A\) has an extension satisfying
then \(T\) satisfies the corresponding inequality in every summand. Finally, if \(F:\mathcal A\to \mathcal A\) is a trace-preserving direct-sum Kraus map, then its trace adjoint satisfies, for every \(X\in \mathcal A\),
in every summand.
For maps \(T:\mathcal A\to \mathcal B\) and \(S:\mathcal B\to \mathcal C\), trace adjoints satisfy
If \(T\) preserves the total trace, then \(T^*(\mathbb {1}_{\mathcal B})=\mathbb {1}_{\mathcal A}\). If \(\widehat T\) admits a Kraus representation, then so does \(\widehat{T^*}\); in particular, both \(T\) and \(T^*\) send families of positive semidefinite matrices to positive semidefinite families. These statements are only the adjoint and positivity part of the classification argument; none of its multiplicative or blockwise conclusions is asserted here.
- Matrix.sum_trace_directSumTraceAdjointMapBetween_mul
- Matrix.directSumTraceAdjointMapBetween_involutive
- Matrix.directSumTraceAdjointMapBetween_id
- Matrix.directSumTraceAdjointMapBetween_comp
- Matrix.directSumTraceAdjointMapBetween_self
- Matrix.IsTracePreservingBetweenDirectSums.directSumTraceAdjointMapBetween_one
- Matrix.traceAdjointMap_directSumMapExtension
- IsKrausCP.traceAdjointMap
- Matrix.IsKrausDirectSumMap.map_posSemidef
- Matrix.IsKrausDirectSumMap.directSumTraceAdjointMapBetween
If \(A\) and \(B\) are length-\(L\) block-injective, the map \(Z\mapsto (t\mapsto \operatorname{tr}(A_tZ))\) has image dimension \(D_A^2\), and similarly for \(B\). Therefore an inclusion \(\mathcal G_L^A\subseteq \mathcal G_L^B\), together with \(D_B\le D_A\), forces \(D_A=D_B\) and \(\mathcal G_L^A=\mathcal G_L^B\). In particular, the three-block trace relation from Lemma 15.2.7 gives this equality whenever the ordering \(D_B\le D_A\) is available. If the inclusion comes from the strictly larger block, \(D_B{\lt}D_A\), then the same dimension step already contradicts the existence of the three-block trace relation. More generally, let \(H\) be a source hypothesis which excludes the simultaneous conclusion
Then the three-block intersection vanishes:
With injectivity at the three-block length, the strict-size branch gives
One such source hypothesis is non-proportionality of the periodic MPS vectors at a sufficiently long chain length: \(\mathbb {C}\, V^{(N)}(A)\ne \mathbb {C}\, V^{(N)}(B)\). Indeed,
by equality of the periodic-boundary constraint spaces, followed by injective uniqueness. For same-dimensional normalized BNT representatives that are not gauge-phase equivalent, the non-equivalence condition supplies this non-proportionality at arbitrarily large chain lengths; the direct-sum injectivity hypotheses remain explicit. Combining the equal-dimension and unequal-dimension branches over all ordered block pairs gives one common positive length \(S_0\) with
For an ordered pair of blocks, the trace-separation conclusion has the form
Equivalently, the homogeneous pair span is full:
Concatenating words propagates this equality to positive multiples of \(S\), and hence to a finite period window for every ordered pair. Combining that window with the conditional period-window homogenization theorem gives a single length \(S_0\) such that
The same conclusion applies to the corresponding normal canonical-form hypotheses with a basis of normal tensors once one-site injectivity is supplied explicitly, since those hypotheses carry the irreducibility and normalization assumptions used in the direct-sum comparison.
- MPSTensor.leftTraceWordMap_injective_of_isNBlkInjective
- MPSTensor.leftTraceWordMap_range_finrank_eq_of_isNBlkInjective
- MPSTensor.leftTraceWordMap_range_eq_of_range_le_of_isNBlkInjective_of_dim_ge
- MPSTensor.leftTraceWordMap_range_eq_of_three_block_trace_relation_left_of_dim_ge
- MPSTensor.not_three_block_trace_relation_left_of_isNBlkInjective_of_dim_gt
- MPSTensor.groundSpace_finrank_eq_of_isNBlkInjective
- MPSTensor.bondDim_eq_of_groundSpace_eq_of_isNBlkInjective
- MPSTensor.bondDim_eq_and_groundSpace_eq_of_groundSpace_le_of_isNBlkInjective_of_dim_ge
- MPSTensor.bondDim_eq_and_groundSpace_eq_of_three_block_trace_relation_left_of_dim_ge
- MPSTensor.groundSpace_inf_eq_bot_of_not_bondDim_eq_and_groundSpace_eq_of_dim_ge
- MPSTensor.pairTraceSeparatingAt_threeBlock_of_isNBlkInjective_of_dim_gt
- MPSTensor.pairTraceSeparatingAt_threeBlock_of_isNBlkInjective_of_dim_ne
- MPSTensor.chainGroundSpace_eq_of_groundSpace_eq
- MPSTensor.mpvSubmodule_ne_of_not_exists_mpv_eq_smul
- MPSTensor.not_exists_mpv_eq_smul_of_not_exists_forall_mpv_eq_mul
- MPSTensor.not_bondDim_eq_and_groundSpace_eq_of_mpvSubmodule_ne
- MPSTensor.groundSpace_inf_eq_bot_of_exists_not_forall_mpv_eq_mul_of_dim_ge
- MPSTensor.pairTraceSeparatingAt_of_groundSpace_inf_eq_bot_of_injective_groundSpaceMap
- MPSTensor.pairTraceSeparatingAt_of_groundSpace_inf_eq_bot_of_isNBlkInjective
- MPSTensor.pairTraceSeparatingAt_threeBlock_of_exists_not_forall_mpv_eq_mul_of_dim_ge
- MPSTensor.groundSpace_inf_eq_bot_of_blocksNotGaugePhaseEquiv_same_dim_of_dim_ge
- MPSTensor.pairTraceSeparatingAt_threeBlock_of_blocksNotGaugePhaseEquiv_same_dim_of_dim_ge
- MPSTensor.forall_pairTraceSeparatingAt_threeBlock_of_blocksNotGaugePhaseEquiv
- MPSTensor.exists_forall_pairTraceSeparatingAt_threeBlock_of_blocksNotGaugePhaseEquiv
Every nonempty closed directed walk of length \(N\) determines a cyclic family of vertices \(v_0,\ldots ,v_{N-1}\). Each \(v_n\to v_{n+1}\) is an edge, where \(v_N=v_0\), and for any edge weights in a commutative monoid, \(\operatorname {wt}(w)=\prod _{n=0}^{N-1}\kappa _{v_n,v_{n+1}}\).
For a Hermitian operator \(\tau \) with normalized eigenvectors \(\phi _i\), the eigenvector overlaps recover the squared norm of \(\psi \):
For a Hermitian operator \(\tau \) with eigenvalues \(\nu _i\) and normalized eigenvectors \(\phi _i\), the expectation in a vector \(\psi \) expands as
In the setting of Theorem E.3.5, every transfer eigenvalue \(\mu \) of \(B\) becomes the transfer eigenvalue \(\mu /r\) of the rescaled unital gauge: the gauge conjugates the transfer map by the congruence with \(\rho ^{1/2}\) and divides it by \(r\). In particular, the peripheral eigenvalues \(e^{2\pi iq/p}\) described in [ CPGSV16 , Section 2.3 ] arise from the transfer eigenvalues of modulus \(r\).
The von Neumann entropy of a Hermitian matrix is the \(-x\log x\) sum over the real parts of the roots of its characteristic polynomial \(\chi _\rho \):
The Hilbert-space local projector \(P_L^{\mathrm{ES}}(A)\) is positive. Consequently, every summand \(R_{i,\tau }^{\dagger }P_L^{\mathrm{ES}}(A)R_{i,\tau }\) is positive, and so is the finite sum over \(\tau \).
If \(w = (J_1, \ldots , J_m)\) is a word in the blocked alphabet, where each \(J_k\) is an \(L\)-tuple in \(\{ 0, \ldots , d{-}1\} ^L\), then concatenating the block words gives a word \(\widetilde{w}\) of length \(mL\) in the original alphabet and \((A^{[L]})^w = A^{\widetilde{w}}\).
For a word \(b:\{ 0,\ldots ,L-1\} \to \{ 0,\ldots ,d-1\} \),
If a finite family of vectors is linearly independent for all sufficiently large \(N\), and two finite linear combinations of that family are equal for all sufficiently large \(N\), then the corresponding coefficients are equal for all sufficiently large \(N\).
Let \(T:M_{D,D}(\mathbb {C})(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D,D}(\mathbb {C})(\mathbb {C})\) have Choi matrix \(\tau \). For every \(V\in M_{D,k}(\mathbb {C})(\mathbb {C})\),
The canonical four-coordinate regrouping and its inverse satisfy
A finite Kronecker product of nonzero matrices is nonzero. Replacing one factor \(A_i\) by \(cA_i\) multiplies the whole finite product by \(c\).
Let \(P_i\) be a finite family of symmetric projections and let \(\gamma \le 1\). Suppose an interaction predicate \(i\sim j\) has at most \(m\) off-diagonal neighbours in each row and in each column, where \(m{\gt}0\). If noninteracting pairs have non-negative anticommutator form and interacting pairs satisfy
then \(H=\sum _iP_i\) satisfies \(H^2\ge \gamma H\) as a quadratic form.
Let \(P_i\) be a finite family of symmetric projections and let \(\gamma \le 1\). Suppose an interaction predicate has at most \(m{\gt}0\) off-diagonal neighbours in each row, noninteracting ordered cross terms are non-negative, and interacting pairs satisfy the norm-compression estimate
Then \(H=\sum _iP_i\) satisfies \(H^2\ge \gamma H\) as a quadratic form. The same conclusion holds from a separate compression coefficient \(\eta \) whenever \(\eta \le (1-\gamma )/m\). In particular, if \(0\le \eta \) and \(\eta m{\lt}1\), then \(H^2\ge (1-\eta m)H\) and \(1-\eta m{\gt}0\).
Let \(P_i\) be a finite family of symmetric projections and let \(\gamma \le 1\). Suppose an interaction predicate \(i\sim j\) has at most \(m\) off-diagonal neighbours in each row for some positive integer \(m\). If noninteracting ordered cross terms are non-negative and, on each interacting pair,
then \(H=\sum _iP_i\) satisfies \(H^2\ge \gamma H\) as a quadratic form.
Let \(R_j\) be restriction to first letter \(j\):
For \(\phi ,\psi \in (\mathbb {C}^d)^{\otimes (L+1)}\),
This auxiliary statement supplies the identity needed to combine the block-injectivity argument [ CPGSV16 , lines 318–345 ] with Appendix C.3, Lemma L [ CPGSV16 , lines 1835–1858 ] .
Let \(A\) be a tensor, and let \(Y^{[L+1]}\) be the physical-block action induced by \(Y\in M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\). For \(I=(i_0,\ldots ,i_L)\), its insertion into the blocked tensor satisfies
Hence equality of the first-site actions of \(Y,Z\) on the MPV family of \(A\) implies equality of the first-block actions of \(Y^{[L+1]},Z^{[L+1]}\) on the MPV family of \(A^{[L+1]}\).
The first-site actions of \(Y,Z\) agree at every length if and only if
for every physical index \(i\) and every finite word \(w\).
Conversely, suppose that \(A\) is \(L\)-block injective. If the two induced insertion tensors on \(A^{[L+1]}\) are equal, then \(YA=ZA\).
Let \(A^1,\ldots ,A^g\) be block tensors with the common word-span property at length \(m\). Fix a complementary word \(\rho \) of length \(M\) and matrices \(C^j_\rho ,X_j\in M_{D_j}(\mathbb {C})\). If, for every wrapped word \(\beta \) of length \(K\) and every middle word \(w\) of length \(m\),
then \(A^j_\beta C^j_\rho = (X_jA^j_\beta )A^j_\rho \) for every block \(j\) and every wrapped word \(\beta \).
If \(A\) is a primitive MPS tensor with PSD fixed point \(\rho \), then every fixed point \(\sigma \) of \(\mathcal{E}_A\) is proportional to \(\rho \): \(\sigma =\frac{\operatorname{tr}(\sigma )}{\operatorname{tr}(\rho )}\rho \).
One has \(\| X\| _F^2=\operatorname{Re}\operatorname{tr}(X^\dagger X)\).
The matrix of \(G_\rho \) is \(\Pi _\rho \), and the matrix of its inverse is \(\Pi _{\rho ^{-1}}\).
Gauge-phase equivalence is symmetric after identifying equal bond dimensions. Moreover, suppose that \(A\), \(B\), and \(C\) have identified bond dimensions, that \(X_1\) and \(X_2\) are invertible, that \(\zeta _1,\zeta _2\ne 0\), and that, for every physical index \(i\),
Then
so \(B\) and \(C\) are gauge-phase equivalent after the corresponding identification of their bond dimensions.
Diagrammatically, the hypothesis is that the two local gauges
\( = \)
and
\( = \)
produce the same target tensor \(B^i\) from the same source tensor \(A^i\). If \(X, Y \in \mathrm{GL}_D(\mathbb {C})\) both conjugate an MPS tensor \(A\) to the same tensor \(B\) (i.e. \(B^i = X A^i X^{-1} = Y A^i Y^{-1}\) for all \(i\)), then \(Y^{-1} X\) commutes with every \(A^i\).
If \(\psi \in G_{K+L}(A)\), then every fixed-prefix suffix restriction of \(\psi \) lies in \(G_L(A)\). For a vector in \(G_{L+1}(A)\), fixing either endpoint gives the expected left or right multiplication of its boundary matrix.
Suppose the length-\(L\) simultaneous block-word tuples span \(\prod _j M_{D_j}(\mathbb {C})\), and suppose the simultaneous identity tuple \((I,\ldots ,I)\) lies in the span of the length-\(S\) simultaneous block-word tuples. Then the length-\(L+S\) simultaneous block-word tuples span \(\prod _j M_{D_j}(\mathbb {C})\). In particular, two full homogeneous spans at lengths \(L\) and \(S\) give a full homogeneous span at length \(L+S\).
Let \(A\) and \(B\) be normalized MPS tensors of bond dimensions \(D_1\geq 1\) and \(D_2\geq 1\). For every \(X\in M_{D_1\times D_2}(\mathbb {C})\) and \(n\geq 0\),
For a positive-definite Choi matrix \(\tau \), the infimum of
over \(S_{1},S_{2}\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) with \(\det S_{1}=\det S_{2}=1\) is attained.
Let \(B\) be an irreducible MPS tensor of positive bond dimension with \(\mathcal{E}_B(\rho )=r\rho \) for some \(\rho {\gt}0\) and \(r{\gt}0\), and suppose every eigenvalue of \(\mathcal{E}_B\) of modulus \(r\) equals \(r\). Then \(r^{-1/2}B\) is a normal tensor.
If \(A\) is a primitive MPS tensor with positive-definite fixed point \(\rho \), then the transfer map \(\mathcal{E}_A\) is irreducible.
The proof uses fixed-point uniqueness (Lemma D.5.5): every PSD fixed point is proportional to \(\rho \), so Wolf’s criterion for irreducibility (a positive-definite fixed point together with uniqueness of positive fixed points implies irreducibility) applies directly.
A map in rectangular Kraus form sends positive semidefinite matrices to positive semidefinite matrices. Every trace-preserving completely positive Kraus map is a completely positive Kraus map.
The composition of two trace-preserving completely positive maps is again trace-preserving completely positive. If \(\mathcal{S}\) has Kraus operators \(A_i\) and \(\mathcal{T}\) has Kraus operators \(B_j\), then \(\mathcal{S}\circ \mathcal{T}\) has Kraus operators \(A_iB_j\).
Assume \(\mu _j\neq 0\) for every block index \(j\). Whenever \(0{\lt}N\) and \(L\le N\), the linear sum of the blockwise ground spaces with periodic boundary conditions is contained in the direct-sum tensor’s ground space with periodic boundary conditions:
where \(j\) ranges over all block indices.
Let \(A^i=\bigoplus _j\mu _j A_j^i\) be in block-injective canonical form, where \(A_1,\ldots ,A_g\) is a basis of normal tensors. The linear sum of the blockwise ground spaces with periodic boundary conditions is contained in the ground space of the block-diagonal tensor on the \(N\)-site ring:
Let \(P_0,\ldots ,P_{m-1}\) be orthogonal projections summing to the identity and cyclically permuted by a Kraus map, \(\sum _vK_vP_{k+1}K_v^\dagger =P_k\). Then the projections are mutually orthogonal, none of them vanishes, and each Kraus operator intertwines consecutive projections:
Consequently, a product of \(\ell \) Kraus operators moves each projection back by \(\ell \) steps; in particular, a product of \(m\) Kraus operators commutes with every projection.
Let \(\rho \) be a positive semidefinite operator on \(A \otimes R\) with reduced state \(\rho _R = \operatorname{tr}_A \rho \). Then the singular reference \((\mathbb {1}_A / d_A) \otimes \rho _R\) satisfies the support condition \(\ker ((\mathbb {1}_A / d_A) \otimes \rho _R) \subseteq \ker \rho \).
For complex matrices \(A\) and \(B\) of compatible rectangular sizes,
Let \(A\) be a block tensor, and let \(C_a,E\in M_D(\mathbb {C})\) satisfy \(A_b C_a = A_bEA_a\) for all physical indices \(a,b\). For a word \(\sigma =(\sigma _1,\ldots ,\sigma _{n+2})\), define
Then \(\alpha \in G_{n+2}(A)\).
Let \(A^1,\ldots ,A^g\) be block tensors, and let \(C^j_a,E^j\in M_{D_j}(\mathbb {C})\) satisfy \(A^j_b C^j_a = A^j_bE^jA^j_a\) for every block \(j\) and all physical indices \(a,b\). For a word \(\sigma =(\sigma _1,\ldots ,\sigma _{n+2})\), define
Then \(\sum _j \alpha _j \in \bigvee _j G_{n+2}(A^j)\).
Let \(A^1,\ldots ,A^g\) be block tensors with common word-span separation at length \(n\), and suppose that \(\sum _a A^j_a A^{j\, \dagger }_a = \mathbb {1}\) for every block \(j\). Suppose a vector \(\psi \in (\mathbb {C}^d)^{\otimes (n+2)}\) has the left-boundary trace decomposition
and suppose that the two trace decompositions agree for every middle word:
Then \(\psi \in \bigvee _j G_{n+2}(A^j)\).
Let \(A\) and \(B\) be left-canonical irreducible tensors of common positive bond dimension satisfying \(B^i=\zeta XA^iX^{-1}\) for an invertible \(X\) and a nonzero scalar \(\zeta \). There is a unitary matrix \(U\), with the same scalar \(\zeta \), such that \(|\zeta |=1\) and \(B^i=\zeta UA^iU^\dagger \) for every \(i\).
Let \(A\) and \(B\) be left-canonical irreducible tensors of common positive bond dimension that are gauge-phase equivalent. Then the gauge can be taken unitary: there are a unitary matrix \(U\) and a scalar \(\zeta \) with \(|\zeta |=1\) such that, for every physical index \(i\),
Assume \(\psi \) on \(K+L_0+1\) sites satisfies the left ground condition on the first \(K+L_0\) sites and the suffix ground condition on every fixed prefix of length \(K\). Then there exist matrices \((Z_j)_j\) and \((Y_u)_u\) with the two trace representations below and, for all \(j\) and \(u\), the compatibility relation
If \(L\le N\), then the translated term is obtained by applying the local parent interaction on the chosen cyclic window:
The Hilbert-space parent Hamiltonian is the sum of the Hilbert-space local terms, \(H_{N,\mathrm{ES}}=\sum _i h_{i,\mathrm{ES}}\), and each local term admits the exact cyclic-averaging formula
For \(L\le N\), a Hilbert-space local term \(h_{i,\mathrm{ES}}\) annihilates a vector \(v\) if and only if every restriction of \(v\) to the cyclic length-\(L\) window starting at \(i\), with the outside configuration fixed, lies in \(G_L^{\mathrm{ES}}(A)\).
Let \(A\) and \(B\) be positive semidefinite, with \(P_A\) and \(P_B\) the orthogonal projections onto their respective ranges. Then
Here the logarithm is extended by zero on the kernel. This identity is the analytic justification for the singular product reference used below; it is not stated verbatim in [ HJPW04 ] .
Let \(A\) be an MPS tensor and let \(P\) be an orthogonal projection. If \((\mathbb {1}-P)A^iP=0\) for every physical index \(i\), then \(P\mathcal{E}_A(PXP)P=\mathcal{E}_A(PXP)\) for every \(X\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\).
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D'}(\mathbb {C})\) be a positive map for which \(T^*(\mathbb {1})\) is positive definite. Then there exists an invertible \(X\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) such that \(\rho \mapsto T(X\rho X^\dagger )\) is a trace-preserving positive map [ Wol12 , Chapter 3, Lemma “Making positive maps trace preserving” ] .
For every marked index \(s\) and every unmarked word \(w\),
The exponent \(|w|+1\) includes the weight at the marked site.
Let \(A\) be injective and fix an interaction range \(L \ge 2\) as in Definition 13.3.3. Let \(h_L(A):=\Pi _{G_L(A)^\perp }\) be the \(L\)-site parent interaction, and for each chain length and site \(i\) let \(h_i\) denote its translate as in Definition 13.3.11. For every pair of overlapping terms \(h_i\) and \(h_j\) with \(0{\lt}d_N(i,j){\lt}L\), where \(d_N(i,j):=\min (|i-j|,\, N-|i-j|)\) is the cyclic distance on the ring (i.e. whose \(L\)-site supports share at least one site under periodic boundary conditions), the source martingale argument asks for constants \(c_{\{ i,j\} }\) and \(\gamma {\gt}0\), independent of \(N\), for which the martingale condition of Theorem 14.3.3.1 holds. Cirac–Perez-Garcia–Schuch–Verstraete [ CPGSV21 , Section IV.C ] use the martingale estimate \(h_i h_j+h_j h_i \ge -c_{ij}(1-\gamma )(h_i+h_j)\) and interpret it as a lower bound on the smallest non-zero principal angle between the local ground spaces \(\ker h_i\) and \(\ker h_j\). In the Hilbert-space formulation above, the source condition is the corresponding quadratic-form inequality
with row-summable coefficients. Lemma 14.3.1.10 gives the implication from this anticommutator estimate to the spectral gap. A directed norm-compression estimate, independent of \(N\), such as
for every overlapping off-diagonal pair is a sufficient stronger hypothesis; Theorem 14.3.3.5 records that consequence. (When \(L=1\) the interaction terms have disjoint supports, so there are no overlapping pairs and the spectral gap follows directly without the martingale argument.)
Let \(F=\bigoplus _a F_a\) and \(G=\bigoplus _a G_a\). Then \(FGF^\dagger =\bigoplus _a F_aG_aF_a^\dagger \). Moreover, if \(r\) is a bijective reindexing of the row space of a matrix \(A\), then \(A_rXA_r^\dagger =(AXA^\dagger )_{r,r}\), where \(A_r\) denotes the corresponding row reindexing.
Let \(D{\gt}0\). The map \(A\mapsto A\otimes I_D\) is injective and preserves matrix products. Consequently, \((F\otimes I_D)(G\otimes I_D)=I\) implies \(FG=I\). In particular, orthonormal rows or columns of \(F\otimes I_D\) imply the corresponding orthonormality of \(F\).
Let \(\mathcal A_1,\mathcal A_2\subseteq M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be nonzero linear subspaces. If \(XY=0\) for every \(X\in \mathcal A_1\) and \(Y\in \mathcal A_2\), then \(\mathcal A_1+\mathcal A_2\ne M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\). No vanishing condition on products in the reverse order is required. This is the matrix-algebra obstruction used in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1465–1470 ] .
Let \(E_k:H_k\to \bigoplus _lH_l\) be the canonical inclusion and let \(B=\bigoplus _lB_l\). Then
In particular, \(B\) commutes with the range projection \(E_kE_k^\dagger \).
- Matrix.sigmaBlockInclusion
- Matrix.sigmaBlockInclusion_isometry
- Matrix.blockDiagonal'_mul_sigmaBlockInclusion
- Matrix.sigmaBlockInclusion_conjTranspose_mul_blockDiagonal'
- Matrix.sigmaBlockInclusion_compression
- Matrix.blockDiagonal'_eq_sum_sigmaBlockInclusion
- Matrix.blockDiagonal'_commute_sigmaBlockInclusion_rangeProjection
Let \(\tau \) be positive semidefinite on \(\mathcal H_S\), let \(X\) be a matrix on \(\mathcal H_S\), and let \(\overline\tau =\tau \otimes d_C^{-1}\mathbf1_C\). Then
Let \(V\) be finite-dimensional and let \(f:V\to V\) have bounded orbits. Then
Assume \(A\) is \(L_0\)-block-injective with \(L_0{\gt}0\) and \(M\ge L_0\). If the second boundary-crossing reduced cyclic interval has boundary matrices \(Y_\tau \), then \(X A^j C^-_\tau =A^jY_\tau \) for every physical letter \(j\), where \(C^-_\tau \) is the complementary word seen from the second cyclic position.
For decompositions \(A^i=X_AD_AU^iX_A^{-1}\) and \(B^i=X_BD_BV^iX_B^{-1}\), the mixed transfer operator of \(A,B\) is the mixed transfer operator of the tensors \(U,V\) conjugated by the outer factors:
Under trace-power form for the blocked multiplication coefficients, for every positive blocked size \(n\), \(c^{(n)}_{i,j,k}=\operatorname{tr}(\chi _{n,i,j,k}^{\, n})\).
An active-support fusion coisometry satisfies
If the chosen blocked-basis coefficients are compared with the fixed BNT-label coefficient system, and that BNT-label system has a positive length-independent \(\chi \)-witness, then each positive-length blocked coefficient is the trace power of the corresponding BNT-label \(\chi \)-matrix:
The length-one idempotent law of a BNT algebra clause also holds for the coefficient family determined by its diagonal chi matrices:
Across the consecutive cut after the first \(L\) sites, the two marginals of \(\sigma ^{(N)}_{L:N-L}\) are the reduced states on \(L\) and \(N-L\) sites, up to the standard finite-index identifications. Consequently, \(I_L(M)\) is the ordinary bipartite mutual information of \(\sigma ^{(N)}_{L:N-L}\).
Let \(U:\mathbb {C}^n\to \mathbb {C}^r\) satisfy \(UU^\dagger =1\). If \(Z\geq 0\), then
For every \(W\in \mathbb {C}^{r\times r}\), one also has \(\operatorname{tr}(U^\dagger WU)=\operatorname{tr}(W)\).
The one-letter selector satisfies
Thus one physical letter selects the identity on the chosen final block and annihilates every other final block.
For a sector decomposition with basis elements \(A_{j}\) and weights \(\mu _{j,q}\), the physical-trace transfer of the assembled tensor is the block direct sum of the weighted transfers of the copies:
A vertex \(h\) is reachable from \(k\) in the nonzero sector support if and only if there is a finite directed walk from \(k\) to \(h\). Consequently, the support is recurrent if and only if every directed edge admits a directed return walk.
Suppose \(\eta _{q,h}\) has a rank-one trace factorization. For fixed boundary sectors \(u,v\), set
Then
This is the corrected edge contraction at [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1613–1617 ] .
Let \(\widehat M\) be the doubled-index tensor associated with \(M\). Then insertion of \(Y_L\), \(Y_R\), and \(Y_C\) gives, respectively, the doubled-index tensors associated with \(P\widetilde M\), \(\widetilde MP\), and \(P\widetilde MP\).
If \(\mathcal S\) and \(\mathcal T\) are trace-preserving completely positive, then so are \(\widehat{\mathcal S}_N\) and \(\widehat{\mathcal T}_N\) for every \(N\).
For a physical word \(\sigma \) of length \(N+1\),
For a physical word \(\sigma \) of length \(N+2\),
Each sector product \(\prod _{j=1}^N\tau _j(B^{(x)})\) of an explicit GSNNCH decomposition is positive semidefinite; hence so are the represented operator
and every chain operator equal to a positive multiple of it.
Each sector product of an explicit GSNNCH decomposition is invariant under the cyclic shift of the periodic chain, where spin \(N+1\) is identified with the first; hence so are the represented operator and every chain operator equal to a positive multiple of it [ CPGSV16 , lines 838–842 ] .
Let \(B\) act on \(L\) consecutive spins of the periodic \(N\)-site chain, embedded at base site \(i\), and let \(r\) denote the cyclic shift of sites. Reindexing both chain configurations by \(r\) carries the embedded operator to its translate at the shifted base site:
An operator embedded into the periodic chain from a positive semidefinite local factor is positive semidefinite; in particular every translate \(\tau _i(B^{(x)})\) of a sector bond is positive semidefinite.
For every pair of sectors \((k,h)\), the spaces carrying \(\eta _{k,h}\) and \(\Omega _{k,h}\) are nonzero-dimensional.
Every left and right factor in a Hayashi sector is nonzero-dimensional.
Suppose that every multiplicity space is nonzero and every diagonal entry of \(\mu _\alpha \) is positive. For \(m_\alpha =\operatorname{tr}(\mu _\alpha )\),
Suppose that every multiplicity space is nonzero and every diagonal entry of \(\mu _\alpha \) is positive. The normalized embedding \(R_\mu \) sends a positive sector family to a positive retained matrix and satisfies \(\operatorname{tr}(R_\mu (X))=\operatorname {Tr}_{\mathrm{sec}}(X)\). Conversely, the sectorwise partial trace sends a positive retained matrix to a positive sector family and satisfies \(\operatorname {Tr}_{\mathrm{sec}}(\widetilde R_\mu (Z))=\operatorname{tr}(Z)\). These trace identities follow by summing the traces of the diagonal sectors; deleting the off-diagonal sector entries does not change the trace.
- MPOTensor.verticalMultiplicityTrace_pos
- MPOTensor.normalizedVerticalSectorEmbedding_posSemidef
- MPOTensor.normalizedRetainedVerticalSectorEmbedding_posSemidef
- MPOTensor.verticalSectorPartialTrace_posSemidef
- MPOTensor.retainedVerticalSectorPartialTrace_posSemidef
- MPOTensor.trace_verticalSectorBlockDiagonal
- MPOTensor.trace_verticalSectorBlockProjection
- MPOTensor.verticalSectorTrace_retainedVerticalSectorPartialTrace
- MPOTensor.trace_normalizedRetainedVerticalSectorEmbedding
The word evaluation of the product tensor along a configuration pair \((\sigma ,\tau )\) expands as a sum over the contracted middle configurations \(\rho \) of tensor products of word evaluations:
Suppose that \(K_x\) is the periodic product of translates of a positive two-site operator \(B_x\), and that \(B_x\) is supported on \(P_x\otimes P_x\). If \(N\geq 2\) and \(1\leq L\leq N\), then the normalized marginal of \(K_x\) on the first \(L\) sites satisfies
Recording the trace-preserving ancillary reduction does not change the purification RFP condition: \(\mathrm{PRFP}_{\mathrm{tp}}(M)\Longleftrightarrow \mathrm{PRFP}(M)\).
Let \(a,b,c,N\in \mathbb N\) satisfy \(a+b+c\leq N\). For configurations \(u,v\) on the first \(a+b\) sites,
where the sum ranges over configurations on the last \(c\) sites. The same identity holds after replacing an arithmetically equal block length by its canonical identification.
Let \(M\) be in normalized BNT-refined horizontal form, generate positive semidefinite ring operators, and satisfy the local renormalization fixed-point equations. This horizontal hypothesis is stronger than literal CPSV canonical form. Then \(\operatorname{tr}\rho ^{(N)}(M)\neq 0\) for every \(N\geq 1\).
Suppose that \(N=(a+1)+(b+2)=(a+2)+(b+1)\). The local closure equations imply
If \(p_k=0\), then \((l_k)_\beta =0\) for every virtual index \(\beta \). Consequently, \(\eta _{h,k}=0\) for every sector \(h\).
Suppose a tensor with zero correlation length is gauge-equivalent, through block-diagonal copy gauges, to an assembled sector decomposition. There is a scalar \(\lambda {\gt}0\) such that every copy satisfies
This is the block equation in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1652–1657 ] .
Let \(V\) be a one-site matrix, not necessarily square. Applying \(V^{\otimes N}\) to both physical legs of the length-\(N\) operator generated by \(M\) is the operator generated by the tensor whose one-site physical matrices are conjugated by \(V\).
Let \(M\) have source zero correlation length. For every \(N\geq 0\), the normalized \(N\)-site marginal obtained by tracing two sites from \(\sigma ^{(N+2)}(M)\) equals the normalized \(N\)-site marginal obtained by tracing one site from \(\sigma ^{(N+1)}(M)\).
This is the first replacement at [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, line 1613 ] . It does not imply the rank-one trace factorization asserted later on that line.
For ket and bra configurations \(\sigma ,\tau \), \(V^{(N)}(\widehat M)_{(\sigma ,\tau )} =H^{(N)}(M)_{\sigma ,\tau }\). If \(p_0=(a,b)\) is the first doubled index and \(\sigma ',\tau '\) are the ket and bra configurations on the remaining \(N\) sites, contraction with \(Y_L\), \(Y_R\), and \(Y_C\) gives, respectively,
Summing the diagonal word evaluations of an MPO tensor over all length-\(N\) configurations closes the vertical loops site by site,
and hence \(\operatorname{tr}H^{(N)}=\operatorname{tr}(E^N)\).
For every bond matrix \(X\), set
Under the hypotheses of the preceding theorem, the transported composites satisfy
Thus the one-site and two-site contraction families lie in the respective fixed-point spaces, as in Appendix C.4, lines 1974–1980. These equations do not assert that either composite is the identity on the whole sector algebra; that conclusion requires the fixed-point structure argument of Appendix C.4, lines 1980–1993.
Write \(\widehat R_2\) for normalized state preparation, \(\widehat{\widetilde R}_1\) for controlled partial trace, and \(W_i\) for retained-coordinate reindexing. The full-matrix extension of the transported coarse-graining map is
Write \(\widehat R_1\) for normalized state preparation, \(\widehat{\widetilde R}_2\) for controlled partial trace, and \(W_i\) for retained-coordinate reindexing. The full-matrix extension of the transported refinement map is
The product of the full comparison with its adjoint is the range projection of the left iterated fusion isometry:
The right side is not asserted to be the identity. Surjectivity of the left iterated fusion map requires completeness of the fusion decomposition, corresponding to the invertible total fusion matrix in [ BMW\(^{+}\)17 , lines 181–191 ] .
The product in the opposite order is the range projection of the right iterated fusion isometry:
The right side is not asserted to be the identity. Surjectivity of the right iterated fusion map likewise requires completeness of the fusion decomposition.
The contraction of the assembled vertical tensor is the weighted block diagonal of the sector contractions:
Suppose that
is a one-site vertical canonical-form identity. Contracting against an arbitrary bond matrix \(X\) gives
If the reverse letterwise identity is also given, then
These are the contracted canonical-form identities used in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.4, lines 1955–1979 ] .
Let \(\iota \) be block-diagonal inclusion of the weighted vertical-sector block family into its full matrix algebra, and let \(W\) be the canonical reindexing to retained physical coordinates. Then the retained-coordinate inclusion is \(\iota _{\mathrm v}=W\circ \iota \).
Let \(\pi \) be diagonal-block extraction to the weighted vertical-sector block family, and let \(W\) be the canonical reindexing to retained physical coordinates. Then the retained-coordinate extraction is \(\pi _{\mathrm v}=\pi \circ W^{-1}\).
Suppose that the physical maps are completely positive and trace preserving and \(U_iU_i^\dagger =1\). For positive sector families \(X\in \mathcal A_1\) and \(Y\in \mathcal A_2\), the matrices \(Z_T(X)\) and \(Z_S(Y)\) are positive and
After the final compression and sectorwise partial trace,
- MPOTensor.precompressionVerticalSectorT_posSemidef
- MPOTensor.precompressionVerticalSectorS_posSemidef
- MPOTensor.trace_precompressionVerticalSectorT
- MPOTensor.trace_precompressionVerticalSectorS
- MPOTensor.verticalSectorTrace_transportedVerticalSectorT
- MPOTensor.verticalSectorTrace_transportedVerticalSectorS
Suppose that every multiplicity space is nonzero and every diagonal entry of \(\mu _\alpha \) is positive. Then \(m_\alpha \ne 0\) for every \(\alpha \), and \(\widetilde R_\mu \circ R_\mu =\operatorname{id}\).
For a bond matrix \(X\), set \(V_2(X)=\bigoplus _\beta n_\beta A_\beta (X)\). Suppose that both vertical canonical forms satisfy their exact reconstruction identities, the two-site multiplicity spaces are nonzero, their diagonal weights are positive, \(S(\mathcal M^{(2)}(X))=\mathcal M^{(1)}(X)\), and \(U_1U_1^\dagger =1\). Then \(U_1^\dagger U_1 Z_S(V_2(X))=Z_S(V_2(X))\). This is the coarse-graining support identity used in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.4, lines 1955–1980 ] .
Under the hypotheses of Lemma 26.9.57, suppose in addition that \(U_2U_2^\dagger =1\) and that \(S\) is completely positive and trace preserving. Then \(\operatorname {Tr}_{\mathrm{sec}}(\widetilde S(V_2(X)))=\operatorname {Tr}_{\mathrm{sec}}(V_2(X))\).
For a bond matrix \(X\), set \(V_1(X)=\bigoplus _\alpha m_\alpha M_\alpha (X)\). Suppose that both vertical canonical forms satisfy their exact reconstruction identities, the one-site multiplicity spaces are nonzero, their diagonal weights are positive, \(T(\mathcal M^{(1)}(X))=\mathcal M^{(2)}(X)\), and \(U_2U_2^\dagger =1\). Then \(U_2^\dagger U_2 Z_T(V_1(X))=Z_T(V_1(X))\). This is the refinement support identity used in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.4, lines 1955–1980 ] .
Under the hypotheses of Lemma 26.9.56, suppose in addition that \(U_1U_1^\dagger =1\) and that \(T\) is completely positive and trace preserving. Then \(\operatorname {Tr}_{\mathrm{sec}}(\widetilde T(V_1(X)))=\operatorname {Tr}_{\mathrm{sec}}(V_1(X))\).
For block-diagonal letters whose block of index \(\gamma \) is the tensor product of a fixed matrix \(X_\gamma \) with a varying letter \(G_{\gamma ,l}\),
For an isometry \(U\) (a rectangular matrix with \(U^\dagger U=1\)) and a nonempty word of square matrices \(F_1,\ldots ,F_L\),
For an MPS tensor \(A\), the pure-state operator \(|V^{(N)}(A)\rangle \! \langle V^{(N)}(A)|\) equals the MPDO generated by the tensor \(M^{ij}=A^i\otimes \overline{A^j}\), acting on a bond space of dimension \(D^2\):
This is the single-ancilla case of the purification picture of [ CPGSV16 ] ; it lets the MPDO block-entropy theory apply to pure-state block entropies.
Let \(a,b\in \{ 0,\ldots ,d{-}1\} \), and let \(u,v\) be words of equal length. Writing \(au,bv\) for adding the letters at the beginning and \(ua,vb\) for adding them at the end, one has \(\operatorname{tr}\! \left(M^{au,\, bv}\right)=\operatorname{tr}\! \left(M^{ua,\, vb}\right)\).
For each basis state \(\sigma = (\sigma _1, \ldots , \sigma _N)\) of the blocked system, where each \(\sigma _k\) is an \(L\)-tuple in \(\{ 0, \ldots , d{-}1\} ^L\), there exists a basis state \(\widetilde{\sigma } = (\widetilde{\sigma }_1, \ldots , \widetilde{\sigma }_{NL})\) of the original system such that \(V^{(N)}(A^{[L]})_\sigma = V^{(NL)}(A)_{\widetilde{\sigma }}\).
For an MPO tensor \(M\) and a configuration \(\sigma \), the matrix product vector of the diagonal tensor \(i\mapsto M^{ii}\) equals the matrix product vector of the doubled-index tensor \(\widehat{M}\) evaluated on the diagonal-paired configuration \(k\mapsto (\sigma _k,\sigma _k)\): \(V^{(N)}(i\mapsto M^{ii})(\sigma ) =V^{(N)}(\widehat{M})(k\mapsto (\sigma _k,\sigma _k))\).
Suppose the doubled-index tensor \(\widehat{M}\) shares its positive-length matrix product vector family with a block-diagonal direct sum \(\bigoplus _k\mu _kA_k\) of blocks \(A_k\) on the doubled index, as in a horizontal canonical form. Then the diagonal tensor of \(M\) generates the same positive-length matrix product vector family as the block-diagonal direct sum \(\bigoplus _k\mu _kA_k^{\mathrm{diag}}\) on the single-spin index, where \(A_k^{\mathrm{diag}}(i)=A_k(i,i)\) is the diagonal restriction of each block. For every \(N\geq 1\),
For an MPO tensor \(M\) and a configuration \(\sigma \), the matrix product vector of the diagonal tensor equals the diagonal entry of the generated operator:
Both sides of (??) equal \(\operatorname{tr}(M^{\sigma _1\sigma _1}\cdots M^{\sigma _N\sigma _N})\).
Let \(V_1,\ldots ,V_r\) be isometries, \(V_k^\dagger V_k=\mathbb {1}\), with \(\sum _kV_kV_k^\dagger =\mathbb {1}\), and suppose \(A^iV_k=V_kB_k^i\) for some tensors \(B_1,\ldots ,B_r\). Then \(\mathcal{V}(A)=\mathcal{V}(\bigoplus _{k=1}^rB_k)\).
For a length-\(N\) physical configuration \(s=(s_0,\ldots ,s_{N-1})\), physical rotation satisfies
Let \(g\) be a block count, \(\dim ,\operatorname{mult}:\{ 0,\ldots ,g-1\} \to \mathbb {N}\), weights \(\omega _{\alpha j}\in \mathbb {C}\) for \(0\leq j{\lt}\operatorname{mult}_\alpha \), and blocks \(A_\alpha \) of bond dimension \(\dim _\alpha \). The vertical direct-sum tensor is the block-diagonal direct sum over the flattened index \((\alpha ,j)\) that repeats \(A_\alpha \) with weight \(\omega _{\alpha j}\), written \(\bigoplus _\alpha \bigoplus _j\omega _{\alpha j}A_\alpha \). Its matrix product vector decomposes as
Let \(N\ge 2\). Suppose that, for every \(i\in \mathbb {Z}/N\mathbb {Z}\), the translated length-two local term commutes with its cyclic right neighbor:
Then all translated length-two local terms commute, and the family \(p_i=h_i(A,2)\) satisfies the finite-chain local-projector hypotheses used in the conditional Appendix B extraction.
Nonzero proportionality implies weak proportionality and eventual nonzero proportionality, is symmetric, and equality of MPV families is the special case with scalar \(1\), at every positive length.
On this one-copy surface, if a family is in normal canonical form with BNT separation and each block is also normal in the algebraic sense, then the blocks form a basis of normal tensors for the associated block-diagonal tensor. The blocks here are distinct representatives.
Let \((A_a)_{a\in I}\), \((C_a)_{a\in I}\), and \((D_b)_{b\in I}\) be matrices in \(M_D(\mathbb {C})\), indexed by a finite alphabet. If
for all \(a,b\in I\), and if \(E=\sum _a C_a A_a^\dagger \), then
for all \(a,b\in I\).
In particular, the same calculation applies when the alphabet is the finite set of words of a fixed length and \(A_\beta \) denotes \(A_{\beta _1}\cdots A_{\beta _K}\).
The same argument also applies when the normalized family is indexed by a finite set \(J\), while \((A_b)_{b\in I}\) and \((D_b)_{b\in I}\) are indexed by a set \(I\). If \((B_a)_{a\in J}\) and \((C_a)_{a\in J}\) are indexed by \(J\), and if, for all \(a\in J\) and \(b\in I\),
then, with \(E=\sum _a C_aB_a^\dagger \), one has
This includes the case where \(I\) and \(J\) are word sets of different lengths.
- MPSTensor.pgvwc07_boundary_matrix_identities_of_indexed_compatibility
- MPSTensor.pgvwc07_boundary_matrix_identities_of_compatibility
- MPSTensor.pgvwc07_boundary_word_matrix_identities_of_compatibility
- MPSTensor.pgvwc07_boundary_matrix_identities_of_two_index_compatibility
- MPSTensor.pgvwc07_boundary_word_matrix_identities_of_two_length_compatibility
Let \(A\) be \(L_0\)-block-injective with \(L_0{\gt}0\). If two boundary matrices have the same product with every one-site tensor on one fixed side, then the two boundary matrices are equal.
Let \(X\in S_1(A)\), and let \(\widetilde A\) be the one-step augmentation of \(A\) by \(X\). If \(A\) is normal, then \(\widetilde A\) is normal, and \(\operatorname{kr}(\widetilde A)=\operatorname{kr}(A)\).
Let \(X\in S_1(A)\), and let \(\widetilde A\) be the one-step augmentation of \(A\) by \(X\). Then \(S_n(\widetilde A)=S_n(A)\) for every \(n\ge 0\).
For positive-definite matrices \(A_1,A_2,B_1,B_2\), \(s\in (0,1)\), and \(\theta \in [0,1]\), with \(\hat{A}=A\otimes \mathbb {1}\) and \(\hat{B}=\mathbb {1}\otimes B^\top \), setting \(A_\theta =\theta A_1+(1-\theta )A_2\) and \(B_\theta =\theta B_1+(1-\theta )B_2\), the fractional product \(\hat A^s\hat B^{1-s}\) is jointly concave in the Loewner order:
For positive-definite matrices \(A\), \(B\) and \(s\in (0,1)\),
where \(A\otimes \mathbb {1}\) and \(\mathbb {1}\otimes B^\top \) are regarded as operators on the Kronecker model space \(\mathbb {C}^{D\times D}\).
Let \(S_m\subseteq (\mathbb {C}^d)^{\otimes m}\) be subspaces, and let \(0{\lt}L\le N\). Suppose that every non-wrapping length-\(L\) interval of \(\psi \), for every fixed choice of the complementary sites, lies in \(S_L\). Suppose also that, for every \(m\ge L\), \((\mathbb {C}^d\otimes S_m)\cap (S_m\otimes \mathbb {C}^d) = S_{m+1}\). Then \(\psi \in S_N\).
Let \(T\) be a positive subunital map, let \(A\ge 0\), let \(p\in (0,1)\), and let \(t{\gt}0\). Then
Let \(T\) be a positive subunital map, let \(A\ge 0\), let \(p\in (1,2)\), and let \(t{\gt}0\). Then
The inequality is reversed relative to the concave integrand, since \(g_{p,t}\) is operator convex.
If the defect block satisfies
then the dilation is an isometry, and compressing the weighted scalar block-diagonal matrix gives \(\sum _{i\in \iota }w_iC_iC_i^\dagger +tSS^\dagger \). The defect relation can also be written as \(\sum _{i\in \iota }C_iC_i^\dagger +SS^\dagger =\mathbb {1}\). Strict positivity of all weights together with \(t{\gt}0\) implies positive definiteness of the scalar block-diagonal matrix. If all weights are nonzero and the defect scalar is nonzero, the inverse diagonal has reciprocal weights, and compressing this inverse gives \(\sum _{i\in \iota }w_i^{-1}C_iC_i^\dagger +t^{-1}SS^\dagger \).
Let \(w_i\ge 0\) and \(t{\gt}0\). If the defect block satisfies \(SS^\dagger =\mathbb {1}-\sum _{i\in \iota }C_iC_i^\dagger \), then
Let \(P_i\) be a finite family of symmetric projections and let \(H=\sum _iP_i\). If the ordered off-diagonal forms obey
with row sums \(\sum _{j\ne i}c_{ij}\le 1\) and \(\gamma \le 1\), then \(H^2\ge \gamma H\) as a quadratic form.
Let \(A\) be \(L_0\)-block-injective with \(L_0{\gt}0\) and \(L_0\le M\). If an outside configuration \(\rho \) has the same word \(\mu \) as \(\tau ^+_\eta (\mu )\) on the sites outside the last-site cyclic window, then the two matrices representing that restriction agree: \(Y_\rho = Y_{\tau ^+_\eta (\mu )}\). The same assertion holds for the second boundary-crossing window: if \(\rho \) has the same outside word as \(\tau ^-_\eta (\mu )\), then \(Y_\rho = Y_{\tau ^-_\eta (\mu )}\). This is the boundary-matrix independence step used to choose one representative outside configuration for each outside word in the closure-property matrix comparison.
If \(A\) is \(L_0\)-block-injective, \(q \ge 1\), and \(k \le qL_0\), then the two one-sided annihilation statements are
The second implication is the left-handed form.
If one of the two blocks is injective, then the corresponding coordinate projection of the pair algebra generated by the simultaneous one-letter pairs is the full matrix algebra. Every finite pair word lies in this pair algebra, and the all-word linear span is the submodule generated by the pair algebra. If the pair algebra is the graph of an algebra automorphism of the matrix algebra, Skolem–Noether turns this graph case into gauge-phase equivalence, so under non-gauge-equivalence the graph branch is impossible. For two blocks of unequal bond dimensions, the graph branch is also impossible because it would identify matrix algebras with different finite dimensions over \(\mathbb {C}\).
- MPSTensor.pairAlgSpan_map_fst_eq_top_of_isInjective
- MPSTensor.pairAlgSpan_map_snd_eq_top_of_isInjective
- MPSTensor.pairEvalWordTuple_mem_pairAlgSpan
- MPSTensor.pair_mul_mem_pairAllWordsSpan
- MPSTensor.pairAlgSpan_toSubmodule_le_pairAllWordsSpan
- MPSTensor.pairAllWordsSpanTop_of_pairAlgSpan_eq_top
- MPSTensor.pairTraceSeparatingAll_of_pairAlgSpan_eq_top
- MPSTensor.gaugePhaseEquiv_of_pairAlgSpan_eq_graph_algEquiv
- MPSTensor.not_pairAlgSpan_eq_graph_algEquiv_of_not_gaugePhaseEquiv
- MPSTensor.subdirect_matrix_pair_eq_top_of_dim_ne
- MPSTensor.pairAlgSpan_eq_top_of_injective_dim_ne
- MPSTensor.matrixPairSubalgebra_eq_top_of_axes
- MPSTensor.matrixPairSubalgebra_eq_top_of_leftAxisIdeal_eq_top
- MPSTensor.matrixPairSubalgebra_eq_top_of_rightAxisIdeal_eq_top
- MPSTensor.matrixPairSubalgebra_eq_graph_algEquiv_of_axisIdeals_eq_bot
- MPSTensor.subdirect_matrix_pair_eq_top_or_eq_graph_algEquiv
- MPSTensor.pairTraceSeparatingAll_of_injective_dim_ne
Let \((A^\ell )_{\ell =1}^r\) be a finite family of tensors. Suppose that the length-\(S\) pair evaluations of blocks \(k\) and \(j\) span their product matrix algebra. For every \(X\in M_{D_k}(\mathbb {C})\), there is a tuple \(M=(M_\ell )_\ell \) in the span of the simultaneous length-\(S\) word evaluations such that \(M_k=X\) and \(M_j=0\).
Homogeneous identity-padding witnesses multiply by concatenation of words. Therefore, if one has a positive period and a full residue window of homogeneous pair spans, then the simultaneous identity pair lies in all sufficiently large homogeneous pair spans. Combined with all-length pair trace separation, this period-window input gives one homogeneous pair trace-separation length. This does not prove the block-separation span condition of [ PGVWC07 ] by itself: fullness of spans up to a bounded length is weaker than the exact homogeneous input used here.
- MPSTensor.pairEvalWordTuple_mem_span_pairWordTuple_length
- MPSTensor.pair_mul_mem_span_pairWordTuple_add
- MPSTensor.pairIdentity_mem_pairWordTupleSpan_zero
- MPSTensor.pairIdentity_mem_pairWordTupleSpan_mul
- MPSTensor.pairIdentity_mem_pairWordTupleSpan_add
- MPSTensor.pairIdentity_mem_pairWordTupleSpan_add_mul
- MPSTensor.pairIdentity_mem_pairWordTupleSpan_eventually_of_period_window
- MPSTensor.pairIdentity_mem_pairWordTupleSpan_eventually_of_pairWordTupleSpanTop_period_window
- MPSTensor.pairIdentity_mem_pairWordTupleSpan_eventually_of_pairAllWordsSpanTop_period_window
- MPSTensor.pairWordTupleSpanTop_of_pairCumulativeWordTupleSpanTop_of_identity_padding
- MPSTensor.pairTraceSeparatingAt_of_pairTraceSeparatingUpTo_of_identity_padding
- MPSTensor.exists_pairTraceSeparatingAt_of_pairTraceSeparatingUpTo_of_eventual_identity_padding
- MPSTensor.exists_pairTraceSeparatingAt_of_pairAllWordsSpanTop_of_identity_padding
- MPSTensor.exists_forall_pairTraceSeparatingAt_of_pairTraceSeparatingAll_of_identity_padding
- MPSTensor.exists_forall_pairTraceSeparatingAt_of_pairTraceSeparatingAll_of_identity_period_windows
- MPSTensor.exists_forall_pairTraceSeparatingAt_of_pairSpanTop_period_windows
- MPSTensor.exists_pairTraceSeparatingAt_of_not_gaugePhaseEquiv_of_pairWordTupleSpanTop_period_window
- MPSTensor.exists_pairTraceSeparatingAt_of_injective_dim_ne_of_pairWordTupleSpanTop_period_window
- MPSTensor.pairAlgSpan_eq_top_of_injective_not_gaugePhaseEquiv
- MPSTensor.pairTraceSeparatingAll_of_injective_not_gaugePhaseEquiv
- MPSTensor.pairTraceSeparatingAll_of_injective_not_gaugePhaseEquiv_cast_left
- MPSTensor.pairTraceSeparatingAll_and_exists_pairTraceSeparatingUpTo_of_injective_not_gaugePhaseEquiv
- MPSTensor.exists_pairTraceSeparatingAt_of_pairTraceSeparatingUpTo_of_identity_period_window
At a fixed length \(S\), the pair trace-separation criterion is dual to full pair product-span. Therefore a pair trace-separation witness supplies a linear combination of word evaluations that is identity on the first block and zero on the second. A common witness for all ordered distinct pairs gives pairwise block-separating words at the same length.
- MPSTensor.pairWordTupleSpanTop_of_pairTraceSeparatingAt
- MPSTensor.hasBlockSelectorOn_of_pairWordTupleSpanTop
- MPSTensor.hasBlockSelectorOn_of_pairTraceSeparatingAt
- MPSTensor.hasPairBlockSeparatingWords_of_forall_pairWordTupleSpanTop
- MPSTensor.hasPairBlockSeparatingWords_of_forall_pairTraceSeparatingAt
- MPSTensor.exists_hasPairBlockSeparatingWords_of_exists_forall_pairTraceSeparatingAt
For positive-definite matrices \(X_1,X_2,Y_1,Y_2\) and \(\theta \in [0,1]\), the parallel sum \((X,Y)\mapsto X(X+Y)^{-1}Y\) is jointly concave in the Loewner order:
where \(X_\theta =\theta X_1+(1-\theta )X_2\) and \(Y_\theta =\theta Y_1+(1-\theta )Y_2\).
Assume uniformly for every \(N\ge 2L\) that the Hilbert-space local terms satisfy the anticommutator martingale estimate
for \(i\ne j\), with row and column coefficient sums bounded by one. If \(L{\gt}1\), then \(1/(4L){\gt}0\) and, for every \(v\in (\mathcal G_{N,L}^{\mathrm{ES}}(A))^\perp \), \(\frac{1}{4L}\| v\| \le \| H_{N,L}^{\mathrm{ES}}(A)v\| \).
Fix \(L{\gt}1\) and let \(i\sim _L j\) mean that the cyclic supports of the length-\(L\) windows at \(i\) and \(j\) meet. Suppose uniformly for every \(N\ge 2L\) that overlapping off-diagonal terms satisfy
Then the explicit norm lower bound with constant \(1/(4L)\) follows for vectors in \((\mathcal G_{N,L}^{\mathrm{ES}}(A))^\perp \).
Fix \(L{\gt}1\), and let \(m=2(L-1)\). Suppose uniformly for every \(N\ge 2L\) and every overlapping off-diagonal pair that
If \(\gamma {\gt}0\), \(\gamma \le 1\), and \(\eta \le (1-\gamma )/m\), then \(0{\lt}\gamma \) and, for every admissible \(N\) and every \(v\in (\mathcal G_{N,L}^{\mathrm{ES}}(A))^\perp \), \(\gamma \| v\| \le \| H_{N,L}^{\mathrm{ES}}(A)v\| \). In particular, if \(\eta \ge 0\) and \(\eta m{\lt}1\), then \(0{\lt}1-\eta m\) and, for every admissible \(N\) and every \(v\in (\mathcal G_{N,L}^{\mathrm{ES}}(A))^\perp \), \((1-\eta m)\| v\| \le \| H_{N,L}^{\mathrm{ES}}(A)v\| \). This strict compression form is a norm-compression sufficient condition, not the principal-angle estimate itself. It is a sufficient strengthening of the anticommutator martingale estimate in Cirac–Perez-Garcia–Schuch–Verstraete [ CPGSV21 , Section IV.C ] . It does not prove the remaining MPS-specific estimate; it isolates the finite-row martingale argument once such a strengthening is supplied.
Fix \(L{\gt}1\). Suppose uniformly for every \(N\ge 2L\) and every overlapping off-diagonal pair that
Then the explicit norm lower bound with constant \(1/(4L)\) follows for vectors in \((\mathcal G_{N,L}^{\mathrm{ES}}(A))^\perp \).
Fix \(L{\gt}1\), and let \(m=2(L-1)\). Suppose uniformly for every \(N\ge 2L\) and every overlapping off-diagonal pair that
that is, a bound \(\| h_{i,\mathrm{ES}}h_{j,\mathrm{ES}}\| \le \eta \) on the operator-product norm. If \(\gamma {\gt}0\), \(\gamma \le 1\), and \(\eta \le (1-\gamma )/m\), then \(0{\lt}\gamma \) and, for every admissible \(N\) and every \(v\in (\mathcal G_{N,L}^{\mathrm{ES}}(A))^\perp \), \(\gamma \| v\| \le \| H_{N,L}^{\mathrm{ES}}(A)v\| \). In particular, if \(\eta \ge 0\) and \(\eta m{\lt}1\), then \(0{\lt}1-\eta m\) and the same norm bound holds with \(\gamma =1-\eta m\).
This is the symmetric (operator-product) counterpart of Lemma 14.3.2.12, obtained from the anticommutator conversion recorded in Remark 14.3.1.2. Like that lemma it is a conditional reduction: the excitation projections satisfy \(\| h_{i,\mathrm{ES}}h_{j,\mathrm{ES}}\| =1\) whenever the overlapping ranges share a common nonzero vector, so the hypothesis is unsatisfiable for \(\eta {\lt}1\) in that case. It isolates the finite-row martingale argument once such a bound is supplied; the gap with the cited principal-angle estimates is documented in the paper-gap note docs/paper-gaps/cpgsv21_martingale_overlap.tex.
Fix \(L{\gt}1\) and let \(i\sim _L j\) mean that the cyclic supports of the length-\(L\) windows at \(i\) and \(j\) meet. Suppose uniformly for every \(N\ge 2L\) that overlapping off-diagonal terms satisfy
Then the explicit norm lower bound with constant \(1/(4L)\) follows for vectors in \((\mathcal G_{N,L}^{\mathrm{ES}}(A))^\perp \).
Fix \(L{\gt}1\) and let \(i\sim _L j\) mean that the cyclic supports of the length-\(L\) windows at \(i\) and \(j\) meet. Suppose uniformly for every \(N\ge 2L\) that overlapping off-diagonal terms satisfy
Then \(1/(4L){\gt}0\), and the explicit norm lower bound with constant \(1/(4L)\) follows for vectors in \((\mathcal G_{N,L}^{\mathrm{ES}}(A))^\perp \).
Let \(H_{N,L}^{\mathrm{ES}}(A)\) be the Hilbert-space representative of the parent Hamiltonian. If a constant \(\gamma {\gt}0\) satisfies the uniform quadratic-form estimate
for every \(N\ge 2L\) and every vector \(v\), then \(\gamma \| v\| \le \| H_{N,L}^{\mathrm{ES}}(A)v\| \) for every \(v\in (\mathcal G_{N,L}^{\mathrm{ES}}(A))^\perp \). In particular, with \(L{\gt}1\) and \(\gamma =1/(4L)\), the explicit gap-bound conclusion follows once this same quadratic-form estimate (??) is supplied.
Fix \(L{\gt}1\) and set \(m=2(L-1)\). Suppose uniformly for every \(N\ge 2L\) that the overlap relation on local windows has at most \(m\) off-diagonal neighbours in each row and in each column. If non-overlapping local terms have non-negative anticommutator form, and overlapping local terms satisfy
then the explicit norm lower bound with constant \(1/(4L)\) follows for vectors in \((\mathcal G_{N,L}^{\mathrm{ES}}(A))^\perp \).
For a fixed chain length \(N\), let \(m{\gt}0\) and \(\gamma \le 1\). Suppose an overlap predicate on local windows has at most \(m\) overlapping off-diagonal windows in each row, non-overlapping local terms have non-negative ordered cross terms, and overlapping local terms satisfy
Then \(H_{N,L}^{\mathrm{ES}}{}^2\ge \gamma H_{N,L}^{\mathrm{ES}}\) as a quadratic form. The same conclusion holds from a separate coefficient \(\eta \) satisfying \(\eta \le (1-\gamma )/m\).
Fix \(L{\gt}1\) and set \(m=2(L-1)\). Suppose uniformly for every \(N\ge 2L\) that the hypotheses of the fixed-chain finite-overlap martingale reduction hold with \(\gamma =1/(4L)\) and this value of \(m\). Then \(1/(4L){\gt}0\), and the explicit norm lower bound with constant \(1/(4L)\) follows for vectors in \((\mathcal G_{N,L}^{\mathrm{ES}}(A))^\perp \).
For a fixed chain length \(N\), let \(m\) be a positive integer and let \(\gamma \le 1\). Suppose an overlap predicate on local windows has at most \(m\) overlapping off-diagonal windows in each row. If non-overlapping local terms have non-negative ordered cross terms, and overlapping local terms satisfy the one-sided ordered cross-term estimate
and the Hilbert-space local terms are symmetric projections, then the Hilbert-space Hamiltonian satisfies \(H_{N,L}^{\mathrm{ES}}{}^2\ge \gamma H_{N,L}^{\mathrm{ES}}\) as a quadratic form.
By definition, for \(B=\bigoplus _{j=1}^g \mu _j A_j\) one has \(\mathcal G_{N,L}(B) =\mathcal G_{N,L}(\bigoplus _{j=1}^g \mu _j A_j)\).
Assume uniformly for every \(N\ge 2L\) that the Hilbert-space local terms satisfy the ordered row-sum estimate (??) with \(\gamma =1/(4L)\). If \(L{\gt}1\), then \(1/(4L){\gt}0\) and, for every \(v\in (\mathcal G_{N,L}^{\mathrm{ES}}(A))^\perp \), \(\frac{1}{4L}\| v\| \le \| H_{N,L}^{\mathrm{ES}}(A)v\| \).
For a fixed chain length \(N\), suppose the Hilbert-space local terms \(h_{i,\mathrm{ES}}\) satisfy the ordered row-sum estimate
with \(\sum _{j\ne i}c_{ij}\le 1\) and \(\gamma \le 1\). Then the Hilbert-space parent Hamiltonian satisfies
for every vector \(v\).
Suppose that \(C\simeq C'\otimes E\). The partial trace over \(E\) is given entrywise by
It preserves positivity and trace.
Let \(P_\tau \) be the orthogonal projector onto the support of \(\tau =\operatorname{tr}_R\sigma \). Then, for every matrix \(X\),
Let \(p{\gt}0\). Suppose the length-\(p\) simultaneous block-word tuples span \(\prod _j M_{D_j}(\mathbb {C})\), and suppose that, for every \(0\le r{\lt}p\), the length-\((s+r)\) simultaneous block-word tuples span \(\prod _j M_{D_j}(\mathbb {C})\). Assume also the normalization \(\sum _a A^j_aA^{j\, \dagger }_a=\mathbb {1}\) for every block \(j\). Then there is a length \(N\) such that, for every \(n\ge N\), if \(S_n:=\bigvee _jG_{n+1}(A^j)\), then
Let \(p{\gt}0\). Suppose the length-\(p\) simultaneous block-word tuples span \(\prod _j M_{D_j}(\mathbb {C})\), and suppose that for every \(0\le r{\lt}p\), the length-\(s+r\) simultaneous block-word tuples span \(\prod _j M_{D_j}(\mathbb {C})\). Then there is a length \(N\) such that, for every \(n\ge N\), the length-\(n\) simultaneous block-word tuples span \(\prod _j M_{D_j}(\mathbb {C})\). More concretely, one may take \(N=s\): writing \(n=s+r+qp\), with \(0\le r{\lt}p\), the span at length \(s+r\) propagates to the span at length \(n\) by multiplying \(q\) times by the period-\(p\) span.
Let \(S_m\subseteq (\mathbb {C}^d)^{\otimes m}\) be subspaces, and let \(0{\lt}L\le N\). Suppose that \(G_L(A)\subseteq S_L\). Suppose also that, for every \(m\ge L\), \((\mathbb {C}^d\otimes S_m)\cap (S_m\otimes \mathbb {C}^d) = S_{m+1}\). Then the periodic local constraints imply \(\mathcal G_{N,L}(A)\subseteq S_N\).
Both periodic relations are equivalence relations (reflexive, symmetric, transitive).
Let \(E(X)=\sum _iK_iXK_i^\dagger \) be a Kraus map that is unital (\(\sum _iK_iK_i^\dagger =\mathbb {1}\)), and assume:
the adjoint Kraus map \(E^*(X)=\sum _iK_i^\dagger XK_i\) has a positive definite fixed point \(\rho {\gt}0\), and
\(E\) is irreducible.
Then \(\mathrm{peripheral}(E)\) is closed under powers: if \(\mu \in \mathrm{peripheral}(E)\), then \(\mu ^n\in \mathrm{peripheral}(E)\) for every \(n\in \mathbb {N}\).
Let \(E:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be a linear map, and assume that \(E\) has a nonzero fixed point \(\rho \neq 0\). Let \(p{\gt}0\). If every peripheral eigenvalue \(\mu \) of \(E\) satisfies \(\mu ^p=1\), then \(\mathrm{peripheral}(E^p)=\{ 1\} \).
Let \(A^1,\ldots ,A^g\) be block tensors. If \(\psi \in (\mathbb {C}^d)^{\otimes (n+2)}\) satisfies
for every physical index \(a,b\), then there are matrices \(C^j_a\) and \(D^j_b\) such that
and, for every middle word \(w\) of length \(n\),
Let \(A^1,\ldots ,A^g\) be block tensors with the common word-span property at length \(m\). Fix matrices \(X_j\), and put \(D^j_\beta =X_jA^j_\beta \). Suppose that \(C^j_\rho \) is indexed by a block \(j\) and a complementary word \(\rho \) of length \(M\), and assume that, for every wrapped word \(\beta \) of length \(K\), every complementary word \(\rho \), and every middle word \(w\) of length \(m\),
If each block satisfies \(\sum _a A^j_aA^{j\, \dagger }_a = \mathbb {1}\), then, for every block \(j\), there is a matrix \(E^j = \sum _\rho C^j_\rho \left(A^j_\rho \right)^\dagger \) such that, for every wrapped word \(\beta \) and complementary word \(\rho \),
This is the calculation in [ PGVWC07 , Theorem 12, proof lines 1446–1451 ] , with the adjoint on \(A^j_\rho \) required by the displayed normalization.
Let \(r\ge 2\). Suppose that the normalized BNT blocks are injective at the common length \(L_0{\gt}0\) and satisfy \(\sum _aA^j_aA^{j\, \dagger }_a=\mathbb {1}\). For every \(n\ge 3(r-1)(L_0+1)\), one has \(\operatorname{span}\{ (A^1_w,\ldots ,A^r_w):|w|=n\} =\prod _jM_{D_j}(\mathbb {C})\). Consequently the spaces \(G_n(A^j)\) form an internal sum. This is the simultaneous spanning estimate used in [ PGVWC07 , Theorem 12, proof lines 1424–1456 ] .
This is Lemma 1 of [ PGWS\(^{+}\)08 ] . Let \(A\) represent a pure finitely correlated state in the canonical gauge \(\mathcal{E}_A(\mathbb {1})=\mathbb {1}\), \(\mathcal{E}_A^*(\Lambda )=\Lambda \), with \(\Lambda {\gt}0\) and \(\operatorname{tr}(\Lambda )=1\). For every physical unitary \(u\),
Equality holds if and only if there are a unitary \(V\) and \(\theta \in [0,2\pi )\) satisfying the following identity for every \(j\) in an eigenbasis \(u=\sum _j e^{i\theta _j}|\widetilde j\rangle \langle \widetilde j|\):
Moreover, \(\mathcal{E}_u\) has at most one eigenvalue of modulus one.
The general three-site physical closure has coefficients
For \(M=\mathcal K\), this is the operator \(\mathcal K_3(X)\) in [ CPGSV16 , Proposition C.7, lines 1510–1516 ] .
Let \(D\geq 1\), let \(M\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be positive-definite, and let \(\lambda _{\min }(M)\) be its smallest Hermitian eigenvalue. For every \(X\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\),
Let \(A\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be Hermitian with positive part \(A^+\). There is a matrix \(\Pi \) with \(0\leq \Pi \leq \mathbb {1}\), \(\Pi ^2=\Pi \), and \(\Pi A=A^+\), namely the orthogonal projection onto the support space of \(A^+\).
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D'}(\mathbb {C})\) be a trace-preserving positive linear map and let \(H\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be Hermitian, with Jordan decompositions \(H=P_+-P_-\) and \(T(H)=Q_+-Q_-\). Then \(\operatorname{tr}[Q_+]\leq \operatorname{tr}[P_+]\).
Let \(S,T\) be positive semidefinite matrices and let \(x\) be a vector. If \((t\mathbf1+S)^{-1}x=(t\mathbf1+T)^{-1}x\) for every \(t{\gt}0\), then \(\sqrt S\, x=\sqrt T\, x\). More generally, for any fixed matrix \(Q\), if \(Q(t\mathbf1+S)^{-1}x=Q(t\mathbf1+T)^{-1}x\) for every \(t{\gt}0\), then \(Q\sqrt S\, x=Q\sqrt T\, x\).
In particular, for positive definite \(A,B\) and every \(t{\gt}0\), put \(\Delta _{A,B}=A\otimes (B^{-1})^{\mathsf T}\). The source-\(B\) left–right resolvent satisfies
and
These are the positive-square-root specializations of the passage from relative modular resolvents to analytic functions of the relative modular operator in Jenčová–Ruskai, arXiv:0903.2895v4, lines 658–680.
Let \(A\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be positive semidefinite, let \(c\in \mathbb {C}\), and let \(\psi \in \mathbb {C}^D\). If \(A\leq c|\psi \rangle \! \langle \psi |\), then there is a non-negative scalar \(a\) such that \(A=a|\psi \rangle \! \langle \psi |\).
For prepared trace-preserving primitive irreducible NTs of positive bond dimension with all copy weights nonzero, grouping CF summands by BNT representative preserves the total bond dimension: the collapsed sector decomposition has total bond dimension equal to the sum of the original block dimensions.
If \(A\) is a primitive MPS tensor with PSD fixed point \(\rho \) and \(\rho \) is positive definite, then \(A\) is an irreducible tensor. This is part of [ SPGWC10 , Proposition 3 ] (see also [ CPGSV16 , Section 2.3 ] ).
Let \(P\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be a nonzero idempotent and let \(E\) be a linear map on \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) that preserves the corner \(PM_{D}(\mathbb {C})P\), is primitive, and fixes the corner projection, \(E(P)=P\). Then the restriction of \(E\) to the corner \(PM_{D}(\mathbb {C})P\) is again primitive.
Let \(p=(p_z)_{z\in Z}\) be a probability distribution on a finite set \(Z\). Define \(h(t)=-t\log t\) for \(t{\gt}0\) and \(h(0)=0\). Then
Let \(N\ge 2\). Suppose that the translated length-two local terms commute for every pair of overlapping cyclic windows: \(h_i(A,2)h_j(A,2) = h_j(A,2)h_i(A,2)\). Then the family \(p_i=h_i(A,2)\) gives the finite-chain local-projector hypotheses used in the conditional Appendix B extraction.
Suppose \(\operatorname{span}\{ (A^1_w,\ldots ,A^r_w):|w|=n\} = \prod _jM_{D_j}(\mathbb {C})\). Then the sum of the local spaces \(G_n(A^j)\) is direct: if
then \(\phi _j=0\) for every \(j\). In particular, for the normalized BNT hypotheses above, this directness holds for every \(n\ge (L_0+1)+(r-1)3(L_0+1)\).
Let \(J\) be a finite set of \(r\) blocks, and let \((A_j)_{j\in J}\) be a finite family of tensors with common block injectivity at length \(L\). Suppose there are length-\(S\) block-separating equations: for each block \(k\),
Then the simultaneous length-\((L+S)\) block-word evaluations span \(\prod _j M_{D_j}(\mathbb {C})\). If the block-separating equations are first obtained from pairwise block-separating equations at length \(S\), the same conclusion holds at length \(L+(r-1)S\).
Every orthogonal projection \(P\) on \(\mathbb {C}^D\) factors through an isometry: there are \(n\in \mathbb {N}\) and \(V\in \mathbb {C}^{D\times n}\) such that
Let \(A\) have invariant-projector closure, and let \(V\) be an isometry, \(V^\dagger V=\mathbb {1}\), whose range projection \(VV^\dagger \) commutes with every \(A^i\). Then the corner tensor \(B^i=V^\dagger A^iV\) again has invariant-projector closure.
Let \(X,C\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) with \(X\geq 0\). If \(C\geq 0\), then \(\operatorname{tr}[CX]\geq 0\); if \(C\leq \mathbb {1}\), then \(\operatorname{tr}[CX]\leq \operatorname{tr}[X]\).
Let \(A\) be an MPS tensor, let \(L\le N\), put \(m=N-L\), and write \(c=(\operatorname{tr}\rho ^{(N)})^{-1}\). Then the pure block entropy is the charpoly-root entropy sum of the \(D^2\times D^2\) bond environment:
The roots are counted with algebraic multiplicity.
Let \(H\) be a positive semidefinite self-adjoint operator on a finite-dimensional complex Hilbert space, and suppose that, for all \(v\), \(\gamma \langle v,Hv\rangle \le \langle Hv,Hv\rangle \), i.e., \(H^2\ge \gamma H\) as a quadratic form, for some \(\gamma {\gt}0\). Then, for every \(v\) in the orthogonal complement of \(\ker H\), \(\gamma \| v\| \le \| Hv\| \). In particular, every positive eigenvalue of \(H\) is at least \(\gamma \). The positive-semidefiniteness hypothesis is essential: without it, \(H=-\mathbb {1}\) with \(\gamma =2\) satisfies the quadratic-form inequality vacuously but violates the norm bound.
For matrices \(\rho ,\sigma \in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\),
Let \(A\) be a normal MPS tensor with bond dimension \(D\ge 1\). Suppose that a Kraus operator \(A^{i_0}\) is non-invertible and that there exist a nonzero vector \(\varphi \in \mathbb {C}^D\) and a nonzero scalar \(\mu \) such that \(A^{i_0}\varphi =\mu \varphi \). Then, for every \(\psi \in \mathbb {C}^D\), \(|\varphi \rangle \! \langle \psi |\in S_{D^2-D+1}(A)\).
For an MPS tensor \(A\) with \(V^{(N)}(A)\neq 0\), the reduced state \(\rho _L^{(N)}(A)\) of the first \(L\) spins is a density matrix: it is positive semidefinite and has unit trace.
Let \(\rho \) be a density matrix on \(A \otimes R\) with reduced state \(\rho _R = \operatorname{tr}_A \rho \), and suppose the support condition \(\ker ((\mathbb {1}_A / d_A) \otimes \rho _R) \subseteq \ker \rho \) holds. Then
Let \(a,b{\gt}0\). Then the function
is integrable on \((0,\infty )\), and
This is the scalar normalization \((\mathrm{intspec})\) in Jenčová–Ruskai, arXiv:0903.2895v4, §2.1, lines 406–413.
For Hermitian matrices \(\rho ,\sigma \) on a finite index set and any bijection \(e\) from that set onto another finite set,
If \(L\le N\), then two prescriptions on the same cyclic interval reduce to the second prescription:
A virtual similarity preserves the physical blocking relation and hence transfer idempotence. It also preserves every local MPS space, so the canonical parent interaction and all its translated local terms are unchanged.
Let \(A\) be a renormalization fixed point. For every \(L\ge 1\) and \(m\ge 1\), the operator-Schmidt Grams of the \(L\)-block and of the \(m\)-site complement are the one-site Grams:
For matrices \(M\) and \(P\), column-stacking vectorization satisfies
Let \(X\in M_{D,k}(\mathbb {C})(\mathbb {C})\) and let \(\eta \in \mathbb {C}^D\otimes \mathbb {C}^k\). Then \(R_X^\dagger \eta \in \mathbb {C}^D\otimes \mathbb {C}^D\) has Schmidt rank at most \(k\).
If \(\psi \in \mathbb {C}^D\otimes \mathbb {C}^D\) has Schmidt rank at most \(k\), then there exist \(X\in M_{D,k}(\mathbb {C})(\mathbb {C})\) and \(\eta \in \mathbb {C}^D\otimes \mathbb {C}^k\) such that \(\psi =R_X^\dagger \eta \).
Let \(\zeta \) be a primitive \(d\)-th root of unity and let \(i,j\) range over the residues modulo \(d\). Then
Suppose that isometries \(V_k\) satisfy
Then \(A\) and \(\bigoplus _k\mu _kB_k\) have the same matrix product vectors at every positive length.
Let \(A\) be an MPS tensor of bond dimension \(D\). For a length-\(\ell \) configuration \(\sigma \) and a length-\(m\) configuration \(\tau \), write the operator-Schmidt factors as
The \(D^2\times D^2\) Gram matrix of the left factor equals the \(\ell \)-fold transfer map evaluated on a matrix unit:
where the sum runs over length-\(\ell \) configurations \(\sigma \). The Gram of the right factor \(R_m\) of an \(m\)-spin complement satisfies the bond-swapped identity
where the sum runs over length-\(m\) configurations \(\tau \).
Assume \(D{\gt}0\). A vector \(\psi \in \mathbb {C}^D\otimes \mathbb {C}^D\) has Schmidt rank at most \(k\) if and only if there is a matrix \(X\in M_D(\mathbb {C})(\mathbb {C})\) of rank at most \(k\) such that \(\psi _{(i,j)}=D^{-1/2}X_{i,j}\).
Suppose every sector of \(Q\) has an equal-dimensional, gauge-phase-equivalent partner in \(P\) with non-decaying overlap, and the converse holds from \(P\) to \(Q\). Then the forward partners may be chosen as a bijection between the two finite sector sets, preserving all three properties.
Let \(P\) and \(Q\) be BNT canonical forms with the same MPV family at every positive length, matched by a bijection \(\beta :J(Q)\simeq J(P)\) with bond-dimension equalities and a gauge-phase equivalence between \(Q_k\) and \(P_{\beta (k)}\) for every \(k\). Then each sector carries a unit-modulus phase \(\zeta _k\), and eventually
This is the equal-MPV coefficient comparison of [ CPGSV16 , Appendix MPV proof, lines 1187–1188 ] .
Let \(P\) be a BNT canonical form, let \(Q\) be a sector decomposition, and assume \(P_{\mathrm{tot}}\) and \(Q_{\mathrm{tot}}\) have the same MPV family at every positive length. Suppose that there is a bijection \(\beta :J(Q)\simeq J(P)\) and scalars \(\zeta _k \in \mathbb {C}\) such that, for every \(k \in J(Q)\), every positive length \(N\), and every spin configuration \(\sigma \) of length \(N\),
Then for every \(k \in J(Q)\) there is \(N_0\) such that, for all \(N{\gt}N_0\), \(c_N^{(\beta (k))}(P)=\zeta _k^N\, c_N^{(k)}(Q)\). This is the coefficient-comparison step of [ CPGSV16 , Appendix MPV proof, lines 1187–1188 ] in full-basis form.
Let \(P\) be a BNT canonical form and \(Q\) a sector decomposition whose total tensors generate eventually nonzero proportional MPV families. Suppose a bijection \(\beta :J(Q)\simeq J(P)\) and scalars \(\zeta _k\) satisfy the matched MPV phase identities (??) for every sector \(k\). Then there is a single eventually-nonzero scalar sequence \(c_N\) and a threshold \(N_0\) such that, for all \(N{\gt}N_0\) and every \(k\in J(Q)\),
The scalar \(c_N\) is the same for every sector \(k\): it is the single global proportionality scalar of [ CPGSV16 , Theorem thm1, lines 1167–1170 ] at length \(N\).
Let \(P\) and \(Q\) each be a BNT canonical form, and suppose every mixed overlap \(O_{P_j Q_k}(N)\) tends to \(0\). Then the union family
is linearly independent for all sufficiently large \(N\). This is [ CPGSV16 , Appendix A ] .
Let \(P\) and \(Q\) be BNT canonical forms whose total tensors have the same MPV family at every positive length. Then there are a bijection \(\beta :J(Q)\simeq J(P)\), bond-dimension equalities, unit-modulus phases \(\zeta _k\), and block gauges \(X_k\) such that \(Q_k^i=\zeta _k X_kP_{\beta (k)}^iX_k^{-1}\). For the same phases there is a copy-weight matching: after a permutation of the copies inside each matched sector, \(\nu _{k,q}=\zeta _k^{-1}\mu _{\beta (k),\tau _k(q)}\).
Let \(P\) and \(Q\) be BNT canonical forms whose total tensors generate the same MPV family at every positive length. There are a sector bijection \(\beta \), copy bijections \(\tau _k\), phases \(\zeta _k\), sector unitaries \(U_k\), and a unitary block-diagonal matrix \(X\) such that
The matched sectors and copies have equal bond dimensions and multiplicities. If \(P_{\mathrm{match}}\) denotes the corresponding reordered block assembly, then \(Q_{\mathrm{flat}}^i=XP_{\mathrm{match}}^iX^{-1}\).
Under the hypotheses of Lemma 10.7.1.1, the per-sector multiplicities agree and there is a permutation \(\tau \) of the per-copy index set identifying the individual weights up to the gauge phase: for every \(q\), \(\nu _{\tilde k_0, \tau (q)} = \zeta ^{-1} \cdot \mu _{j_0, q}\). This is the per-copy realisation of [ CPGSV16 , Appendix A ] : the multiset equality from Lemma 10.7.1.1 is upgraded to a concrete indexing between the matched \(P\)- and \(Q\)-copies.
Let \(P, Q\) be sector decompositions with weights \(\mu _{j,q}\) and \(\nu _{k,q'}\), and fix indices \(j_0\), \(\tilde k_0\), and a nonzero scalar \(\zeta \in \mathbb {C}\setminus \{ 0\} \). Suppose that for every \(N {\gt} N_0\),
Then the per-sector multiplicities agree, \(r_{j_0}(P) = r_{\tilde k_0}(Q)\), and the rescaled per-copy weight multisets coincide. This is [ CPGSV16 , Appendix A ] read on a single matched sector.
Let \(P\) and \(Q\) be BNT canonical forms. If, for every positive length \(N\) and word \(\sigma \), a sector \(P_j\) and a sector \(Q_k\) have MPV families related by
then \(|\zeta |=1\).
For any invertible \(C \in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) and any linear map \(E\) on \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), write \(S_C(E)(X)=C^{-1}E(CXC^\dagger )(C^\dagger )^{-1}\) for the similarity transform by \(C\). The transforms by \(C\) and \(C^{-1}\) compose to the identity:
Let \(E\) be an irreducible completely positive map on \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), let \(C \in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be invertible, with \(\det C \neq 0\), and let \(c {\gt} 0\). Define the similarity-transformed map by
Then \(E'\) is also irreducible.
Let \(T:M_{D,D}(\mathbb {C})(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D,D}(\mathbb {C})(\mathbb {C})\) have Choi matrix \(\tau \). Suppose \(P\in M_{D,D}(\mathbb {C})(\mathbb {C})\) and \(X\in M_{D,k}(\mathbb {C})(\mathbb {C})\) satisfy \(PX=X\). If \(R_P\tau R_P^\dagger \ge 0\), then the rectangular right compression of \(\tau \) by \(X\) is positive semidefinite.
Let \(S\) be a \(*\)-subalgebra of \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), let \(W\subseteq \mathbb {C}^D\) be irreducible under \(S\), and let \(f\) be an intertwiner from \(W\) into a subspace \(W'\). Then there exists a real number \(c\geq 0\) such that, for all \(x,y\in W\),
Let \(S\) be a \(*\)-subalgebra of \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), let \(W,W'\subseteq \mathbb {C}^D\) be irreducible under \(S\), and let \(f:\mathbb {C}^D\to \mathbb {C}^D\) be linear. Suppose that \(f(W)\subseteq W'\) and \(f(Ax)=A(fx)\) for every \(A\in S\) and \(x\in W\). Then either \(f\) is zero on \(W\), or \(f\) is injective on \(W\) and maps \(W\) onto \(W'\).
Let \(S\) be a \(*\)-subalgebra of \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) acting on \(\mathbb {C}^D\). A complex subspace \(W\subseteq \mathbb {C}^D\) is invariant under every member of \(S\) if and only if it is the underlying complex subspace of a submodule of \(\mathbb {C}^D\) over \(S\). Under this identification, an invariant subspace is irreducible under \(S\) precisely when it is a simple \(S\)-module.
Let \(S\) be a \(*\)-subalgebra of \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), and let \(\mathcal D_1,\mathcal D_2\) be sets of subspaces irreducible under \(S\). If no piece of \(\mathcal D_1\) is of the same type as any piece of \(\mathcal D_2\), then
Let \(S\) be a \(*\)-subalgebra of \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), and let \(W\subseteq \mathbb {C}^D\) be invariant under every member of \(S\). Then \(W\) is the sum of a finite family of pairwise orthogonal subspaces contained in \(W\), each irreducible under \(S\).
Let \(S\) be a \(*\)-subalgebra of \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), and let \(W\subseteq \mathbb {C}^D\) be invariant under every member of \(S\). Then \(W^\perp \) is also invariant under every member of \(S\): \(AW^\perp \subseteq W^\perp \) for every \(A\in S\).
Let \(S\) be a \(*\)-subalgebra of \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), let \(W\subseteq \mathbb {C}^D\) be invariant under \(S\), and let \(P\) be the orthogonal projection onto \(W\). Then \(P(Ax)=A(Px)\) for every \(A\in S\) and \(x\in \mathbb {C}^D\).
Let \(S\) be a \(*\)-subalgebra of \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), and let \(W,W'\subseteq \mathbb {C}^D\) be irreducible under \(S\). Then \(W\) and \(W'\) are of the same type if and only if there is an intertwiner from \(W\) into \(W'\) that is injective on \(W\) and maps \(W\) onto \(W'\).
Let \(S\) be a \(*\)-subalgebra of \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), and let \(W,W'\subseteq \mathbb {C}^D\) be irreducible under \(S\). If \(W\) is of the same type as \(W'\), then there is an intertwiner \(u\) from \(W\) into \(W'\) that maps \(W\) onto \(W'\) and satisfies \(\langle u(x),u(y)\rangle =\langle x,y\rangle \) for all \(x,y\in W\).
Let \(S\) be a \(*\)-subalgebra of \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), let \(\mathcal D\) be a family of subspaces irreducible under \(S\), and let \(W\) be irreducible under \(S\), with \(W\leq \bigvee _{W'\in \mathcal D}W'\). Then \(W\) is of the same type as some piece of \(\mathcal D\).
Let \(S\) be a \(*\)-subalgebra of \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), and let \(W,W',W''\subseteq \mathbb {C}^D\) be irreducible under \(S\). If \(W\) is of the same type as \(W'\) and \(W'\) is of the same type as \(W''\), then \(W\) is of the same type as \(W''\).
Let \(S\) be a \(*\)-subalgebra of \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), let \(W\subseteq \mathbb {C}^D\) be irreducible under \(S\), and let \(f:\mathbb {C}^D\to \mathbb {C}^D\) be linear. Suppose that \(f(W)\subseteq W\) and \(f(Ax)=A(fx)\) for every \(A\in S\) and \(x\in W\). Then there is \(c\in \mathbb {C}\) such that \(fx=cx\) for every \(x\in W\).
Let \((f_{k,i,j})_{k{\lt}K,\, i{\lt}m_k,\, j{\lt}d_k}\) be an orthonormal basis of \(\mathbb {C}^D\). There are an identification of the index set of triples \((k,i,j)\) with \(\{ 0,\ldots ,D-1\} \), realizing \(\sum _kd_km_k=D\), and a unitary \(U\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) whose columns are the basis vectors, such that every matrix \(A\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) acting on the basis by
for matrices \(B_k\in M_{d_k}(\mathbb {C})\) satisfies
Let \(K:\{ 0,\ldots ,r-1\} \to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) and \(L:\{ 0,\ldots ,s-1\} \to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be two Kraus families. Write \(K\mathbin {+\! +}L\) for their concatenation as a family indexed by \(\{ 0,\ldots ,r+s-1\} \). Then
If \(A\) is a primitive MPS tensor with positive-definite fixed point \(\rho \), then it satisfies the strengthened condition in Definition 8.1.1.6: \(\mathcal{E}_A\) is irreducible, the fixed point \(\rho \) is positive definite, and the peripheral spectrum of \(\mathcal{E}_A\) is \(\{ 1\} \). The source clause is [ SPGWC10 , Proposition 3(c) ] ; the definition used here records irreducibility separately.
Fix \(t{\gt}0\) and positive-definite matrices with \(A_1\le A_2\) and \(B_1\le B_2\). The resolvent of the Kronecker model \(A\otimes \mathbb {1}+t\, (\mathbb {1}\otimes B^\top )\) of the commuting left- and right-multiplication superoperators is antitone:
For \(t{\gt}0\), positive-definite \(A_1,A_2,B_1,B_2\), and \(\theta \in [0,1]\), with \(\hat{A}=A\otimes \mathbb {1}\) and \(\hat{B}=\mathbb {1}\otimes B^\top \), setting \(A_\theta =\theta A_1+(1-\theta )A_2\) and \(B_\theta =\theta B_1+(1-\theta )B_2\):
If \(P_\tau \) is the orthogonal projector onto the support of a positive semidefinite matrix \(\tau \), then
Let \(\tau \) be positive semidefinite and let \(c{\gt}0\). Then
For every finite-dimensional auxiliary space \(\mathcal H_R\),
The corresponding identity for an auxiliary left factor is
Consequently, for \(d_R{\gt}0\),
If \(P_\tau \) is the orthogonal projector onto the support of a positive semidefinite matrix \(\tau \), then
The support projection \(\pi \) of a positive semidefinite matrix \(\rho \) factors as \(\pi =\rho W\) for a spectral pseudo-inverse \(W\), witnessing that the range of \(\pi \) is the range of \(\rho \). For a rectangular matrix \(Y\), the support projection \(\pi \) of \(YY^\dagger \) fixes \(Y\), \(\pi Y=Y\); and whenever \(AY=YG\) for some matrix \(G\)—that is, \(A\) maps the range of \(Y\) into itself—the one-sided invariance \((\mathbb {1}-\pi )A\pi =0\) holds.
Let \(A,B\) be positive semidefinite, let \(t{\gt}0\), set \(B^+=(B^{-1/2}_{\mathrm{supp}})^2\), and let \(P_B\) be the support projection of \(B\). Then
Let \(A\) and \(B\) be positive semidefinite, and write \(B^+=(B^{-1/2}_{\mathrm{supp}})^2\). Then
Let \(A,B,C,D\) be positive semidefinite matrices. Write \(B^+=(B^{-1/2}_{\mathrm{supp}})^2\) and \(D^+=(D^{-1/2}_{\mathrm{supp}})^2\), and let \(P_B\) be the orthogonal projection onto \((\ker B)^\perp \). If, for every \(t{\gt}0\),
where the inverses act as relative-modular superoperators on matrices, then
This is the square-root specialization of the support functional-calculus passage in Jenčová–Ruskai, arXiv:0903.2895v4, lines 788–793. The projection \(P_B\) is essential: the source gives the common generalized resolvents only after restriction to \((\ker B)^\perp \). Deriving this restricted equality requires the preceding singular equality argument and its kernel hypotheses.
Let \(I\) be a finite nonempty set. For each \(i\in I\), let \(S_i\) be a positive-semidefinite matrix, let \(P_i\) be its support projection, and let \(b_i\) lie in its support. Write
Assume also that \(b\) lies in the support of \(S\), and put \(x=Gb\). Then
Jenčová and Ruskai give the positive-definite residual expansion in equations \((\mathrm{Mj})\) and \((\mathrm{eq:Schz1})\) of the Appendix to arXiv:0903.2895v4. The support assumptions make the same expansion valid for the generalized inverses of the \(S_i\) and of \(S\).
Let \(I\) be a finite nonempty set. For each \(i\in I\), let \(A_i\) and \(B_i\) be positive-semidefinite matrices of the same size. For \(t{\gt}0\), write
Then
No kernel inclusion between \(A_i\) and \(B_i\) is required. This lemma is a positive-semidefinite support-domain extension of the positive-definite calculation in equations \((\mathrm{Mj})\), \((\mathrm{eq:Schz1})\), and \((\mathrm{eq:Schwzt})\) at lines 1299–1328 of Jenčová–Ruskai, arXiv:0903.2895v4; their generalized-inverse notation is given at lines 254–262. The paper does not state this extension. Its later singular equality theorem at lines 761–785 assumes \(\ker B_i\subseteq \ker A_i\) and is not asserted here. The subsequent singular entropy-equality passage is recorded in docs/paper-gaps/cpsv16_ssa_equality_hayashi_markov.tex.
If, for every block \(k\) and physical index \(i\), \(B_k^i=X_kA_k^iX_k^{-1}\), then the weighted direct sums satisfy
where \(X\) is the flattened block-diagonal gauge from Definition 11.2.1. Hence the two assembled tensors are gauge equivalent.
Under the hypotheses of Lemma 15.2.6, the length-\(L\) spaces \(\mathcal G_L^A\) and \(\mathcal G_L^B\) satisfy \(\mathcal G_L^A\subseteq \mathcal G_L^B\). If the corresponding nonzero middle matrix exists on both sides, then \(\mathcal G_L^A=\mathcal G_L^B\).
- MPSTensor.leftTraceWordMap
- MPSTensor.groundSpaceMap_eq_leftTraceWordMap
- MPSTensor.groundSpace_eq_leftTraceWordMap_range
- MPSTensor.leftTraceWordMap_range_le_of_three_block_trace_relation_left
- MPSTensor.leftTraceWordMap_range_eq_of_three_block_trace_relation
- MPSTensor.groundSpace_le_of_three_block_trace_relation_left
- MPSTensor.groundSpace_eq_of_three_block_trace_relation
Let \(A\) and \(B\) be tensors with virtual bond dimensions \(D_A\) and \(D_B\). Assume that \(A\) is \(L\)-block injective. Let \(\Delta _A\in M_{D_A}(\mathbb {C})\) with \(\Delta _A\neq 0\), and let \(\Delta _B\in M_{D_B}(\mathbb {C})\). Suppose that, for all words \(u,v,t\) of length \(L\),
Then for every \(Z\in M_{D_A}(\mathbb {C})\) there is a matrix \(W\in M_{D_B}(\mathbb {C})\) such that, for all words \(t\) of length \(L\), \(\operatorname{tr}(ZA_t)+\operatorname{tr}(WB_t) =0\). This is the trace-dual algebraic step in the two-block case of the direct-sum lemma of [ PGVWC07 ] .
For a positive-semidefinite \(D \times D\) matrix \(M\),
and equality holds if and only if \(M=(\operatorname{tr}M/D)\mathbb {1}\).
For any linear endomorphism \(T\) on \(M_{D_1\times D_2}(\mathbb {C})\), the operator trace expands as
where \(E_{pq}\in M_{D_1\times D_2}(\mathbb {C})\) has entry \(1\) in position \((p,q)\) and zero elsewhere.
If \(\rho _{ABC}\) is Hermitian, then \(\operatorname{tr}_A(\rho _{ABC})\), \(\operatorname{tr}_C(\rho _{ABC})\), and \(\operatorname{tr}_{AC}(\rho _{ABC})\) are all Hermitian. The same holds for bipartite partial traces \(\operatorname{tr}_A(\rho _{AB})\) and \(\operatorname{tr}_B(\rho _{AB})\).
For every \(A\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), the trace norm is the sum of the square roots of the eigenvalues of the positive operator \(A^\dagger A\):
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D'}(\mathbb {C})\) be a linear map and let \(X\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) satisfy \(X^\dagger T^*(\mathbb {1})X=\mathbb {1}\). Then, for every \(\rho \in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\),
Let \(V\) satisfy \(A^iV=VB^i\) for all \(i\). Then, for every \(X\),
If moreover \(V^\dagger V=\mathbb {1}\), then every eigenvalue of \(\mathcal{E}_B\) is an eigenvalue of \(\mathcal{E}_A\).
The Hilbert-space local projector \(P_L^{\mathrm{ES}}(A)\) is a symmetric projection, and every Hilbert-space local term \(h_{i,\mathrm{ES}}\) on the \(N\)-site chain is a symmetric projection.
Let \(L\le N\) and let \(h_{i,\mathrm{ES}},h_{j,\mathrm{ES}}\) be Hilbert-space local terms whose cyclic \(L\)-windows are site-disjoint: no site of the periodic chain has cyclic offset \({\lt}L\) from both \(i\) and \(j\). Then the terms commute pointwise: for every vector \(v\), \(h_{i,\mathrm{ES}}(h_{j,\mathrm{ES}}v) =h_{j,\mathrm{ES}}(h_{i,\mathrm{ES}}v)\). The same commutation identity holds for the corresponding local terms before passing to the Hilbert-space model. Their ordered cross term is non-negative: \(0\le \operatorname{Re}\langle h_{i,\mathrm{ES}}v,h_{j,\mathrm{ES}}v\rangle \).
- MPSTensor.CyclicWindowsDisjoint
- MPSTensor.CyclicWindowsDisjoint.symm
- MPSTensor.CyclicWindowsDisjoint.of_not_cyclicWindowsOverlap
- MPSTensor.localTerm_commute_of_cyclic_windows_disjoint
- MPSTensor.localTermES_commute_of_cyclic_windows_disjoint
- MPSTensor.localTermES_re_inner_nonneg_of_cyclic_windows_disjoint
Each Hilbert-space local term \(h_{i,\mathrm{ES}}\) is positive, hence the full Hilbert-space parent Hamiltonian \(H_{N,\mathrm{ES}}\) is positive.
The lifts from \(AX\) and \(XB\) preserve multiplication,
and each of the four lifts from \(AX\), \(XB\), \(A\), and \(B\) preserves adjoints:
Fix a dimension \(d_C\ge 1\) and a primitive \(d_C\)-th root of unity \(\zeta \). For every matrix \(M\) on \(\mathcal{H}_S\otimes \mathbb {C}^{d_C}\), the uniform average of the conjugations by the \(d_C^2\) unitaries \(\mathbb {1}_S\otimes W(a,b)\) on the second factor is the partial trace over that factor tensored with the maximally mixed state \(\mathbb {1}_C/d_C\):
Fix a physical letter \(\eta \) used outside the complementary sites. Suppose the two one-sided boundary matrix families \(Y^+\) and \(Y^-\) have been extracted from the cyclic windows. If, for every word \(\mu \) on the complementary sites, these boundary matrices agree on the boundary conditions built from \(\eta \), \(Y^+_{\tau ^+_\eta (\mu )}=Y^-_{\tau ^-_\eta (\mu )}\), then there is a single family \(Y_\mu \) satisfying
for all letters \(a,b\).
If \(C\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) is nonzero, then
This is the matrix-factorization input used in [ PGVWC07 , Lemma 3 ] .
For \(i,j\in \mathbb {Z}/N\mathbb {Z}\), if the two length-two cyclic supports starting at \(i\) and \(j\) overlap, then
Let \(U\) be a family of bond matrices satisfying the unit pair-index isometry condition
Then for every bond matrix \(Z\),
Let \(A^1,\ldots ,A^r\) be blocks satisfying the normalization \(\sum _a A^j_aA^{j\, \dagger }_a=\mathbb {1}\) and assume that every block is injective at length \(L\): \(\operatorname{span}\{ A^j_u:|u|=L\} =M_{D_j}(\mathbb {C})\). If there are block-separating equations of length \(S\), then, for every \(n\ge L+(r-1)S\), \(\operatorname{span}\{ (A^1_w,\ldots ,A^r_w):|w|=n\} = \prod _j M_{D_j}(\mathbb {C})\). In particular, for normalized BNT representatives satisfying the displayed unital normalization, if \(L_0{\gt}0\) and \(\Gamma _{L_0}^{A^j}\) is injective for every block \(j\), the same conclusion holds with \(S=3(L_0+1)\) and \(n\ge (L_0+1)+(r-1)3(L_0+1)\).
Suppose that the length-\(q\) simultaneous products span the product algebra, \(\operatorname{span}\{ (A^1_w,\ldots ,A^r_w):|w|=q\} = \prod _jM_{D_j}(\mathbb {C})\), and that every block satisfies \(\sum _a A^j_aA^{j\, \dagger }_a=\mathbb {1}\). Then the simultaneous products span the product algebra at every length \(n\ge q\). This is the simultaneous-tuple form of the unital propagation in [ PGVWC07 , lines 893–898 ] .
If \(u\) is unitary, then replacing Kraus operators \(\{ A_i\} \) by their unitary mixtures \(\{ \sum _j u_{ij} A_j\} \) preserves the channel:
Let \((B_k)_{k\in I}\) be a finite family of blocks with weights \(\nu _k\), and let \((A_\alpha )_{\alpha \in J}\) be a finite family of representative blocks. Suppose there is a bijection
such that, writing \(e(k)=(\alpha ,j)\), one has \(\nu _k=\omega _{\alpha j}\) and, for every positive length \(N\), \(V^{(N)}(B_k)=V^{(N)}(A_\alpha )\). Then
for every positive length \(N\). This is the finite-sum reindexing after the vertical sectors have been grouped in [ CPGSV16 , Proposition 4.13 ] .
Adjunction exchanges the two oriented horizontal bond indices in the vertical view:
On a chain of length \(N=M+1\), with \(L_0\le M\), fix a physical letter \(\eta \) used outside the complementary sites and a word \(\mu \) of length \(M+1-(L_0+1)\). Write \(\tau ^+_\eta (\mu )\) for the boundary condition at the support crossing the last site and \(\tau ^-_\eta (\mu )\) for the boundary condition at the second boundary-crossing support. Their exposed complements are both exactly \(\mu \).
Let \(A\) be \(L_0\)-block-injective with \(L_0{\gt}0\). Fix two matrix families \(Y^+\) and \(Y^-\) and the two reindexed boundary conditions \(\tau ^+_\eta (\mu )\) and \(\tau ^-_\eta (\mu )\). If, for every physical letter \(j\), \(Y^+_{\tau ^+_\eta (\mu )} A^j = Y^-_{\tau ^-_\eta (\mu )} A^j\), then \(Y^+_{\tau ^+_\eta (\mu )} = Y^-_{\tau ^-_\eta (\mu )}\).
Assume \(A\) is \(L_0\)-block-injective with \(L_0{\gt}0\) and \(M\ge L_0\). If the reduced cyclic interval crossing the last site has boundary matrices \(Y_\tau \), then, for every physical letter \(j\), one has
Here \(C^+_\tau \) is the complementary word seen by that cyclic interval.
Let \(A=\bigoplus _k A_k\). Denote compression to the \((j,j)\) bond block by \(C_j\) and its trace-pairing adjoint by \(I_j\). Then
If \(\mathcal{E}_A\) and \(\mathcal{E}_j\) are the transfer maps of \(A\) and \(A_j\), respectively, then, for every \(n\geq 0\),
The sector-supported rank-one map \(\mathcal R_{j;R,l}(X)=I_j(R)\operatorname{tr}(lC_j(X))\) has operator trace
Finally, if \(\mathcal{E}_j^*(l)=\lambda l\), then
- MPSTensor.directSumSectorCompression
- MPSTensor.directSumSectorInclusion
- MPSTensor.directSumSectorInclusion_eq_sum
- MPSTensor.directSumSectorCompression_inclusion
- MPSTensor.directSumSectorRankOne
- MPSTensor.directSumSectorRankOne_apply
- MPSTensor.directSumSectorCompression_transferMap
- MPSTensor.directSumSectorCompression_transferMap_pow
- MPSTensor.trace_directSumSectorRankOne
Let \(M\) generate an MPDO whose finite-chain operator \(\rho ^{(N)}(M)\) is positive semidefinite with nonzero trace. For every block length \(L\) with \(2L+1\le N\), one has \(I_L\le I_{L+1}\). The implication \(1\le L{\lt}\lfloor N/2\rfloor \Longrightarrow 2L+1\le N\) shows that this contains the range of [ CPGSV16 , Proposition 4.5, line 801 ] .
Let \(A\) be an MPS tensor with \(V^{(N)}(A)\neq 0\). For every block length \(L\) with \(2L+1\le N\), covering \(1\le L{\lt}\lfloor N/2\rfloor \), \(S_L^{(N)}(A)\le S_{L+1}^{(N)}(A)\). This is the pure-state area law of [ CPGSV16 , Section 3, line 599 ] .
Let \(A\) be an MPS tensor of bond dimension \(D\geq 1\) with \(V^{(N)}(A)\neq 0\). For every block length \(L\le N\), \(S_L^{(N)}(A)\leq 2\log D\), uniformly in \(L\) and \(N\). This is the area law of [ CPGSV16 , Section 3, line 599 ] : the block entropy is bounded by a constant independent of the block size.
Let \(A\) be an MPS tensor of bond dimension \(D\geq 1\) with \(V^{(N)}(A)\neq 0\). For the purification MPDO of \(A\), whose generated operator is the pure state \(|V^{(N)}(A)\rangle \! \langle V^{(N)}(A)|\), the mutual information between a block of \(L\) spins and the rest satisfies \(I_L\leq 4\log D\), uniformly in \(L\) and \(N\).
If \(E\) satisfies the Schwarz inequality, then
Consequently, \(A\in \mathcal{A}(E)\) exactly when both equalities hold. This is [ Wol12 , Equations (5.13)–(5.14) ] .
If \(A\) is injective and \(L\ge 2\), then on an \((L+1)\)-site chain the kernels of the two adjacent Hilbert-space \(L\)-site local terms have common kernel equal to the Hilbert-space \((L+1)\)-site MPS ground space:
Let \(A\) be left-canonical and let \((P_k)\) be orthogonal projections summing to \(\mathbb {1}\) and fixed by the adjoint transfer map. Then the same sector decomposition and support isometries of Theorem E.5.2 exist. In particular, the adjoint fixed-point condition \(\mathcal{E}_A^\dagger (P_k)=P_k\) gives \(P_kA^i=A^iP_k\), which gives the corner-letter identity \(\varphi _k(C_k^i)=P_kA^iP_k\).
The fixed-point identity \(\mathcal{E}_A^\dagger (P_k)=P_k\), together with left-canonicality \(\sum _i(A^i)^\dagger A^i=\mathbb {1}\), places \(P_k\) in the multiplicative domain of \(\mathcal{E}_A^\dagger \), forcing \(P_kA^i=A^iP_k\) for every letter \(A^i\). The result then follows from Theorem E.5.2.
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) have bounded orbits, let \(P_T\) be its mean-ergodic projection, and let \(P_T^*\) be the trace-pairing adjoint of \(P_T\). Then
and \(P_T^*(Y)=Y\) if and only if \(T^*(Y)=Y\).
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be positive and trace preserving, suppose that \(T^*\) satisfies the Schwarz inequality, and suppose that there is a positive definite matrix \(\rho \) satisfying \(T(\rho )=\rho \). Let \(P_T\) be the mean-ergodic projection of \(T\). There are positive integers \(d_k,m_k\), a unitary \(U\), and density matrices \(\sigma _k\in M_{m_k}(\mathbb {C})\) such that
for every \(A\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\). This is the full-support conditional-expectation step in the proof of [ Wol12 , Theorem 6.14 ] .
Let \(E\) be a trace-preserving Kraus map on \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) with a positive definite fixed point \(\rho {\gt}0\), \(E(\rho )=\rho \). There are \(n\in \mathbb {N}\), positive dimensions \(d_0,\ldots ,d_{n-1}\) and multiplicities \(m_0,\ldots ,m_{n-1}\) with \(\sum _kd_km_k=D\), realized by an explicit identification of the index sets, and a unitary \(U\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) such that a matrix \(X\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) satisfies \(E^*(X)=X\) exactly when
for some matrices \(B_k\in M_{d_k}(\mathbb {C})\); that is, up to reordering the two tensor factors of each block,
The positive definite fixed point removes the zero block: this is the unital case of the block representation in Equation (1.39) of [ Wol12 ] , invoked by [ Wol12 , Theorem 6.14 ] . The general form of [ Wol12 , Theorem 6.14 ] , with a zero block and density weights \(\rho _k\) on the Schrödinger-picture fixed points, is not asserted here.
Under the hypotheses of Theorem 25.2.10, the adjoint fixed-point \(*\)-subalgebra equals the Kraus commutant:
This is [ Wol12 , Theorem 6.13 ] .
There exist integers \(n\), block sizes \(d_1,\ldots ,d_n\geq 1\), multiplicities \(m_1,\ldots ,m_n\geq 1\), and a \(\mathbb {C}\)-algebra isomorphism from the adjoint-fixed-point \(*\)-subalgebra to \(\prod _{k=1}^{n}M_{d_k}(\mathbb {C})\) such that \(\sum _{k=1}^{n}d_km_k\leq D\).
If the Kraus map is trace-preserving and has a positive definite fixed point \(\rho {\gt}0\) with \(E(\rho )=\rho \), then \(\operatorname{Fix}(E^*)\) is a \(*\)-subalgebra of \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\).
Let \(L\) be a GKSL generator in Lindblad form with Hamiltonian \(H\) and Lindblad operators \(\{ L_j\} \). Define the adjoint generator \(L^*\) by (??). If \(L\) has a faithful stationary state \(\rho _0{\gt}0\) with \(L(\rho _0)=0\), then, for any \(A\), the condition \(L^*(A)=0\) implies, for every \(j\),
That is, \(\ker (L^*)\subseteq \{ H,L_j,L_j^\dagger \} '\). This is [ Wol12 , Theorem 7.2 ] .
Under the same hypotheses as Theorem 19.6.8,
That is, the adjoint kernel equals the commutant of \(\{ H,L_j,L_j^\dagger \} \). This is [ Wol12 , Theorem 7.2 ] .
The length-\(2\) blocked AKLT tensor is on-site symmetric under \(\mathbb {Z}_2 \times \mathbb {Z}_2\), with each group element acting by the Kronecker square \(P_g \otimes P_g\) of the corresponding single-site spin-\(1\) \(\pi \)-rotation \(P_g\) (Definition 17.2.12).
The AKLT correlation length, computed from the subleading eigenvalue \(\lambda _2 = -\tfrac 13\), equals
It is finite and positive.
The AKLT factor system (Theorem 17.2.8), built from the anticommuting gauges \(i\sigma _y\) and \(\sigma _z\) (Theorem 17.2.5), is not a coboundary: its commutator phase on the two generators is \(-1\). Its class in \(H^2(\mathbb {Z}_2 \times \mathbb {Z}_2, \mathrm{U}(1)) \cong \mathbb {Z}_2\) is therefore non-trivial, so the AKLT chain realizes a non-trivial SPT phase rather than a trivial product state.
The AKLT tensor is not injective at a single site: \(\operatorname{span}_{\mathbb {C}}\{ A^0, A^1, A^2\} \) is the three-dimensional space of traceless matrices \(\mathfrak {sl}(2,\mathbb {C})\), which is a proper subspace of \(M_{2}(\mathbb {C})\).
Each of the three Pauli matrices \(\sigma _x\), \(\sigma _y\), \(\sigma _z\) is an eigenvector of the AKLT transfer map with eigenvalue \(-\tfrac 13\):
For every element \(g\) of \(\mathbb {Z}_2 \times \mathbb {Z}_2\), the length-\(2\) blocked AKLT tensor has string order in the sense of Definition 12.3.11 for the twist by \(g\), with the maximally mixed boundary state \(\Lambda = \tfrac {1}{2}\mathbb {1}\) as its stationary boundary state.
The value \(1\) is the leading eigenvalue of the AKLT transfer map, with the identity \(\mathbb {1}\) as eigenvector, and \(-\tfrac 13\) is a subleading eigenvalue, with \(\sigma _z\) as eigenvector. The subleading modulus is therefore \(\tfrac 13\).
The AKLT tensor is on-site symmetric under the \(\mathbb {Z}_2 \times \mathbb {Z}_2\) subgroup of \(\mathrm{SO}(3)\) generated by two commuting \(\pi \)-rotations about orthogonal axes, acting on the spin-\(1\) physical index.
Let \(L{\gt}1\). Suppose that for every \(N\ge 2L\) and every overlapping off-diagonal pair of cyclic length-\(L\) windows,
in quadratic form. Then the parent Hamiltonian has the explicit gap constant \(\gamma _L:=1/(4L){\gt}0\). Concretely, if \(N\ge 2L\) and \(v\in (\mathcal G_{N,L}^{\mathrm{ES}}(A))^\perp \), then \(\gamma _L\| v\| \le \| H_{N,L}^{\mathrm{ES}}(A)v\| \).
Let \(A\) be injective and let an Appendix B structural datum be fixed. Put
with the two copies of \(q_2(A)\) lifted to the indicated faces of the three-site coefficient space. Then
These are the coefficient-space analogs of the idempotence, commutation, and kernel-intersection equations in [ CPGSV16 , Definition D.2 ] . The hatted operators are not identified here with the source projectors on \(\mathcal H_A\otimes \mathcal H_X\) and \(\mathcal H_X\otimes \mathcal H_B\). For a normal left-canonical RFP tensor, injectivity follows from the RFP structural theorem and is not an additional hypothesis.
The two Appendix B coefficient representatives satisfy
and their adjacent actions on the common three-site coefficient space commute:
Thus they satisfy the algebraic overlapping two-site condition of Definition 14.1.1. This is the coefficient-space analog of the projector-and-commutator part of [ CPGSV16 , Definition D.2 ] . The hatted maps have not yet been identified with the source projectors on the explicitly factored spaces. By itself the result does not prove the kernel-intersection equation in that definition and makes no assertion for every chain length. The coefficient-space kernel equation is established in the next two results.
Let \(A\) be equipped with Appendix B structural data \((X,\Lambda ,U)\) as in Definition 14.1.34. Its pair-index isometry equation
implies \(U^*U=1\). In particular, \(U\) is injective.
For every \(N\geq 0\), one has \(U^{*\otimes N}U^{\otimes N}=1\). Hence \(U^{\otimes N}\) is injective.
Suppose the conditional even-chain hypotheses give commuting two-site parent terms for a tensor \(B\). If the nearest-neighbor parent Hamiltonian also satisfies the ground-space spanning equation of Definition 14.1.15, with BNT components \(A_1,\ldots ,A_g\), then \(B\) satisfies the all-chain nearest-neighbor commuting parent-Hamiltonian ground-space condition of Definition 14.1.17.
In particular, if a normal left-canonical RFP tensor has nonzero bond dimension, the same conditional Appendix B hypotheses, and the same ground-space spanning equation, then it satisfies the full all-chain condition in [ CPGSV16 , Theorem 3.10(iii) ] .
On the homogeneous three-single-site coefficient space \((\mathbb {C}^d)^{\otimes 3}\), the hatted Appendix B (AX) representative acts as \([\widehat Q_{AX}]_{AX} =[\widehat Q_{AX}]\otimes I_d\). This equation gives the coefficient-factor specialization of the left local action in [ CPGSV16 , Definition D.2 ] . It does not construct a projector for an arbitrary factorization \(\mathcal H_A\otimes \mathcal H_X\otimes \mathcal H_B\).
On the homogeneous three-single-site coefficient space \((\mathbb {C}^d)^{\otimes 3}\), the hatted Appendix B (XB) representative acts as \([\widehat Q_{XB}]_{XB} =I_d\otimes [\widehat Q_{XB}]\). This equation gives the coefficient-factor specialization of the right local action in [ CPGSV16 , Definition D.2 ] . It does not construct a projector for an arbitrary factorization \(\mathcal H_A\otimes \mathcal H_X\otimes \mathcal H_B\).
Opening the outer virtual bond in the two-site contraction of [ CPGSV16 , Equations (3.17)–(3.18) ] gives the following local-support family. For every boundary matrix \(Y\), \(U^{\otimes 2}I_\varphi (v_Y) = \Gamma _2(\Lambda U)(Y)\). Consequently, \(\operatorname{ran}(U^{\otimes 2}I_\varphi )=G_2(\Lambda U)\).
The projector \(P_2\) satisfies
In particular, \(q_2(\Lambda U)\) annihilates the image of \(U^{\otimes 2}I_\varphi \), while \(P_2\) fixes that image pointwise.
Let \((P_2)_{01}\) and \((P_2)_{12}\) be the two adjacent placements of the two-site basic support projector on three physical sites. Then \((P_2)_{01}(P_2)_{12} =(P_2)_{12}(P_2)_{01}\). This is the local three-site consequence of the parent-space construction and the basic-vector form in [ CPGSV16 , Definition 3.9, Equations (3.16)–(3.18), and Appendix B ] . It does not assert commutation for every chain length.
The two adjacent placements commute: \(P_{01}P_{12}=P_{12}P_{01}\). The following support-location schematic marks the two bonds on which the projectors act; it does not depict the doubled operator network for the equality above.
Suppose that \(A\) is equipped with Beigi sector data, with one-site spatial unitary \(U\). For \(N\geq 2\), let \(Q_N\) be the product of the translated complementary parent interactions and let \(\widetilde Q_N\) be the corresponding product in sector coordinates. Then \((U^*)^{\otimes N}Q_NU^{\otimes N} = \widetilde Q_N\).
Suppose that \(A\) is equipped with Beigi sector data. For \(N\geq 2\), let \(h_0,\ldots ,h_{N-1}\) be its translated length-two parent interactions and set \(Q_N=\prod _{n=0}^{N-1}(\mathbb {1}-h_n)\). Every vector fixed by \(Q_N\) belongs to the kernel of the periodic parent Hamiltonian \(H_N=\sum _n h_n\).
Let \(G\) be a finite directed graph whose edge weights are non-negative integers, and let
be the weighted sum over ordered cyclic vertex sequences. Suppose that \(s_N\) is constant for all sufficiently large \(N\). Then every edge that belongs to a directed cycle has weight one, every directed cycle is a repetition of a single loop, and, for every \(N{\gt}0\), \(s_N=\# \{ a:w(a,a){\gt}0\} \). This is the comparison in [ Bei12 , Section IV ] .
Let \(a\to a\) be a positive loop. For every \(N\geq 2\), its physical cyclic product-of-pairs state belongs to the kernel of the length-two periodic parent Hamiltonian. Equivalently, its Euclidean representative belongs to the parent ground space. This is only a membership assertion; it does not assert that the loop states span the ground space.
Suppose that the parent-ground-space dimension is eventually constant. For every \(N{\gt}2\), the positive-loop product states form a nonzero pairwise orthogonal family and
In particular, the same conclusion holds under the BNT and all-chain nearest-neighbor parent-ground-space hypotheses.
- MPSTensor.BeigiSectorGraphData.loopCyclicProduct_ne_zero
- MPSTensor.BeigiSectorGraphData.loopCyclicProduct_inner_eq_zero_of_ne
- MPSTensor.BeigiSectorGraphData.loopProductState_ne_zero
- MPSTensor.BeigiSectorGraphData.loopProductStateES_ne_zero
- MPSTensor.BeigiSectorGraphData.loopProductStateES_inner_eq_zero_of_ne
- MPSTensor.BeigiSectorGraphData.loopProductStateES_linearIndependent
- MPSTensor.BeigiSectorGraphData.span_loopProductStateES_eq_parentHamiltonianGroundSpaceES
- MPSTensor.BeigiSectorGraphData.span_loopProductStateES_eq_parentHamiltonianGroundSpaceES_of_hasBNTSectorData
For every \(N{\gt}0\), the periodic matrix product vector of \(C_a\) has coefficient \(\prod _{n=0}^{N-1}\varphi _a(r_n,l_{n+1})\) on a cyclic configuration in sector \(a\), and coefficient zero on every other sector configuration. Consequently, the periodic vector of the physical loop tensor is exactly the sitewise-unitary image of this cyclic product-of-pairs state. The same identities hold for the tensor on the minimal Schmidt support. For the normalized minimal tensor it is \(\nu _a^{-N}\Psi _a^{(N)}\).
The tensor \(\widetilde C_a\) on the Schmidt support is injective, as is its image under the one-site unitary. In particular, the physical tensor is normal.
The transfer map of the unnormalized coordinate tensor is
Hence the transfer map of \(\widehat C_a\) is idempotent. This remains true after the physical unitary rotation. The normalized physical tensor is injective and therefore normal.
- MPSTensor.BeigiSectorGraphData.loopBondNorm_pos
- MPSTensor.BeigiSectorGraphData.loopBondNorm_ne_zero
- MPSTensor.BeigiSectorGraphData.loopBondNorm_eq_frobeniusNorm
- MPSTensor.BeigiSectorGraphData.transferMap_minimalLoopCoordinateTensor
- MPSTensor.BeigiSectorGraphData.transferMap_minimalLoopCoordinateTensor_comp_self
- MPSTensor.BeigiSectorGraphData.transferMap_normalizedMinimalLoopCoordinateTensor
- MPSTensor.BeigiSectorGraphData.normalizedMinimalLoopCoordinateTensor_isTransferIdempotent
- MPSTensor.BeigiSectorGraphData.normalizedMinimalLoopTensor_isTransferIdempotent
- MPSTensor.BeigiSectorGraphData.normalizedMinimalLoopTensor_isInjective
- MPSTensor.BeigiSectorGraphData.normalizedMinimalLoopTensor_isNormal
For every \(N\geq 2\), the periodic ground-space dimension is
where the sum is over ordered cycles and the indices are read modulo \(N\). This is equations (3)–(4) of [ Bei12 , Section III ] for chains of length at least two. The one-site periodic interaction requires a separate convention.
At period two, the ground-space dimension is
The sum is over ordered pairs: if \(a\ne b\), then \((a,b)\) and \((b,a)\) are distinct summands. This is the length-two convention stated after equation (4) of [ Bei12 , Section III ] .
Let \(A\) be the tensor with physical index pairs \((\alpha ,\beta )\in \{ 0,1\} ^{2}\) and letters
the canonical normal-tensor renormalization fixed point with maximally mixed spectrum \(\Lambda =(1/2,1/2)\): each node carries two spins, and the pair \((|00\rangle +|11\rangle )/\sqrt2\) is shared between the second spin of one node and the first spin of the next. The transfer map is
which is idempotent since \(\operatorname{tr}\operatorname {diag}(\Lambda )=1\), and \(A\) is a single normal tensor, so no copy weights are involved. With the Pauli matrix \(Z\) on the second spin of one node and on the first spin of the next node, the two regions are adjacent, and the two-region expectation is
while after a shift by one site, which leaves one free site on each complementary arc, it is
Thus \(A\) is a renormalization fixed point whose correlations are not independent of distance in the unrestricted sense of Definition 24.5.7. The block \(\mathcal{E}_A^{0}=1\) between adjacent observables is not governed by idempotence.
- MPSTensor.bellPairChainTensor
- MPSTensor.bellPairChainTensor_isNormalTensor
- MPSTensor.bellPairChainTensor_isTransferIdempotent
- MPSTensor.bellPairChainTensor_adjacent_twoPointExpectation
- MPSTensor.bellPairChainTensor_shifted_twoPointExpectation
- MPSTensor.bellPairChainTensor_not_isPhysicalCID
- MPSTensor.bellPairChain_isNormalTensor_isTransferIdempotent_and_not_isPhysicalCID
If \(X\) is an operator on a spin–ancilla block, then for \(i,j\in [d]^L\),
For \(i,j\in [d]^L\) and \(x,y\in [d]^K\), applying the ancillary traces to both blocks across the cut \(L\mid K\) gives
Assume \(0{\lt}N\), \(L\le N\), and let the cyclic interval beginning at \(i\) cross the boundary cut, so \(N{\lt}i+L\). Suppose that the block tensors have the common word-span property at length \(N-i\) and that
Then each block component of the fixed boundary-crossing restriction lies in its local block space:
Assume \(0{\lt}N\), \(L\le N\), and let the cyclic interval beginning at \(i\) cross the boundary cut, so \(N{\lt}i+L\). Put \(a=i+L-N\) and \(\rho =\tau _a\cdots \tau _{i-1}\). Suppose also that the block tensors have the common word-span property at length \(N-i\). If
then there are matrices \(C^j_{i,\tau }\) such that, for every block \(j\) and every word \(\beta \) of length \(a\),
Let
Assume that the physical alphabet is nonempty, that every \(\mu _j\) is nonzero, that \(0{\lt}N\), and that \(L\le N\). For every boundary-crossing interval beginning at \(i\), assume that the simultaneous products
span the product algebra \(\prod _jM_{D_j}(\mathbb {C})\). Then there are matrices \(C^j_{i,\rho }\) such that, for every boundary-crossing interval \(i\), every outside word \(\rho \) of length \(N-L\), every block \(j\), and every word \(\beta \) before the cut, \(A^j_\beta C^j_{i,\rho } = ((\mu _j^NX_j)A^j_\beta )A^j_\rho \).
With the hypotheses and notation of Lemma 15.3.10, assume in addition that \(L+L_0\le N\) and that every boundary-crossing interval beginning at \(i\) has the simultaneous tail-word spanning property: the products
span the product algebra \(\prod _jM_{D_j}(\mathbb {C})\). Let \(\psi \in \mathcal G_{N,L}(\bigoplus _j\mu _jA_j)\). Then there are block-diagonal boundary conditions \(X_j\) such that the displayed representation holds and, for every \(j\), the displayed component lies in the corresponding single-block ground space:
With the hypotheses and notation of Lemma 15.3.11, assume in addition that \(L+L_0\le N\). Thus
Let \(\psi \in \mathcal G_{N,L}(\bigoplus _j\mu _jA_j)\). Then there are block-diagonal boundary conditions \(X_j\) such that the displayed representation holds and, for every \(j\), the displayed component lies in the corresponding single-block ground space:
No simultaneous spanning assumption is imposed at the short crossing tails.
With the hypotheses and notation of Lemma 15.3.10, assume in addition that \(L+L_0\le N\). Assume also that, for every boundary-crossing interval beginning at \(i\) whose tail length lies below the block-separation bound, \(N-i {\lt} (L_0+1) +(g-1)((L_0+1)+((L_0+1)+(L_0+1)))\), the simultaneous products
span the product algebra \(\prod _jM_{D_j}(\mathbb {C})\). Let \(\psi \in \mathcal G_{N,L}(\bigoplus _j\mu _jA_j)\). Then there are block-diagonal boundary conditions \(X_j\) such that the displayed representation holds and, for every \(j\), the displayed component lies in the corresponding single-block ground space:
This derives the boundary-condition comparison of [ PGVWC07 , Theorem 12, proof lines 1446–1456 ] at every crossing tail whose length reaches the displayed block-separation bound.
Let \(g\ge 2\). Let \(A_j\) be irreducible left-canonical blocks with normalized self-overlap, pairwise inequivalent up to gauge and phase, injective at a common length \(L_0{\gt}0\), and satisfying \(\sum _aA^j_aA^{j\, \dagger }_a=\mathbb {1}\). Let \(\mu _j\ne 0\) for every \(j\), and assume
Then
as asserted in [ PGVWC07 , Theorem 12, proof lines 1424–1456 ] .
Let \(A_1,\ldots ,A_g\) be the blocks in a block-injective canonical form, and assume that their MPV families are pairwise different:
Let \(L_0\) be a common injectivity length. Assume the multi-block range used in [ PGVWC07 , Theorem 12 ] :
Set \(S_m:=\bigoplus _{j=1}^gG_m(A_j)\). The open-segment recursion in [ PGVWC07 , Theorem 12 ] says that, for every \(m\ge L\),
Let \(H_{S_L,N}\) denote the periodic parent Hamiltonian whose local ground space is \(S_L\). The periodic-boundary conclusion of the same theorem is
for every \(N\ge L+L_0\).
Let \(A\) be \(L_0\)-block-injective. Let \(X\) be a boundary matrix, and let \(Y_\nu \) be a matrix for each complementary word \(\nu \) of length \(K\). Suppose that, for every word \(\alpha \) of length \(L_0\), every word \(\beta \) of length \(L_0\), and every complementary word \(\nu \),
Then, for every word \(\alpha \) of length \(L_0\) and every complementary word \(\nu \), \(X A^\alpha A^\nu = A^\alpha Y_\nu \).
If \(A\) is \(L_0\)-block-injective with \(L_0 {\gt} 0\), \(m \ge L_0\), and \(X \in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) commutes with every length-\(m\) product \(A^\omega \), then \(X\) already commutes with every length-\(L_0\) product \(A^u\).
Assume \(A\) is \(L_0\)-block-injective with \(L_0 {\gt} 0\). Let \(\{ Z_u\} _{|u|=L_0}\) be a family indexed by words of length \(L_0\). If, for some \(K \ge 0\) and every suffix word \(w\) of length \(K\), there exists \(Y_w \in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) such that \(Z_u A^w = A^u Y_w\) for every word \(u\) of length \(L_0\), then there exists \(X \in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) with \(Z_u = A^u X\) for every word \(u\) of length \(L_0\).
Let \(A\) be left-canonical, irreducible, primitive, of positive bond dimension. For every \(P{\gt}0\), the blocked tensor \(A^{[P]}\) is irreducible: there is no orthogonal projection \(Q\) with \(Q\neq 0\), \(Q\neq \mathbb {1}\) such that \((\mathbb {1}-Q)(A^{[P]})^\alpha Q=0\) for every \(P\)-blocked index \(\alpha \).
Let \(A\) be a left-canonical irreducible tensor whose adjoint transfer map has peripheral spectrum \(\{ \gamma ^j:0\le j{\lt}m\} \) for a primitive \(m\)th root of unity \(\gamma \), with blocked cyclic-sector decomposition \((C_u)_{u=1}^m\), \((P_u)_{u=1}^m\), and linear isomorphisms \(\varphi _u:M_{\dim C_u}(\mathbb {C})\xrightarrow {\sim }P_uM_{D}(\mathbb {C})P_u\). Assume explicitly that the \(P_u\) are orthogonal projections summing to \(\mathbb {1}\) and satisfying \(\mathcal{E}_{A^\dagger }(P_{u+1})=P_u\), that each sector has nonzero bond dimension, and that the compression maps satisfy
Here \(P_uA^{[m]}\) denotes the blocked tensor with letters \(P_u(A^{[m]})^\alpha \). Then every sector tensor satisfies \(\sigma _\partial (\mathcal{E}_{C_u})=\{ 1\} \) and is tensor-irreducible.
Let \(A\) be an irreducible MPS tensor with \(D{\gt}0\) and \(\sum _i(A^i)^\dagger A^i=\mathbb {1}\). Then there exists a blocking length \(p{\gt}0\) such that \(\sigma _\partial (\mathcal{E}_{A^{[p]}})=\{ 1\} \).
If the Lindblad data of a GKSL generator are block-upper-triangular with respect to some nontrivial projector \(P\), then there exists a density matrix \(\rho _0\) with nontrivial kernel satisfying \(L(\rho _0)=0\). This is [ Wol12 , Proposition 7.6, (4)\(\Rightarrow \)(2) ] .
Let \(M\) generate an MPDO whose doubled-index tensor \(\widehat M\) generates the same positive-length MPV family as a BNT canonical form \(\bigoplus _{j,q}\mu _{j,q}A_j\), and let \(P=P^\dagger \) satisfy \(PM=PMP\) on the vertically viewed tensor. Then on every minimal representative \(A_j\) the insertions of \(MP\) and \(PMP\) agree; equivalently, \((\mathbb {1}-P)MP=0\) on every representative.
Let \(\bigoplus _{j,q}\mu _{j,q}A_j\) be a BNT canonical form and let \(Y_L,Y_C,Y_R\in M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\), with \(Y_1V^{(N)}(A)\) denoting \(Y\) acting on the first physical index of the MPV. If, for every \(N\geq 1\),
then \(Y_RA_j=Y_CA_j\) for every minimal representative \(A_j\). This is the representative-grouped application of Lemma L and anticipates the concrete instantiation with \(Y_L,Y_C,Y_R\) the physical-index insertions of \(P\), \(PHP\), \(HP\) in Theorem 23.4.30.
Let the doubled-index tensor \(\widehat M\) generate the same positive-length MPV family as a BNT canonical form \(\bigoplus _{j,q}\mu _{j,q}A_j\). If, entrywise at every positive length,
then for every minimal representative \(A_j\) the insertions associated with \(H^{(N)}P\) and \(PH^{(N)}P\) agree. Repeated copies over \(A_j\) are grouped through the coefficient \(\sum _q\mu _{j,q}^{N}\).
Suppose \(A\) generates the same MPV family as \(\bigoplus _{k=1}^rB_k\), where each \(B_k\) is irreducible with at least one nonzero Kraus operator. Then there are nonzero weights \((\mu _k)_{k=1}^r\) and blocks \((C_k)_{k=1}^r\) such that, for every \(N\) and every \(\sigma \),
each \(C_k\) is irreducible and left-canonical, \(\sum _i(C_k^i)^\dagger C_k^i=\mathbb {1}\), with positive bond dimension. This is the blockwise form used in the arbitrary-tensor trace-preserving gauge below.
Let \(P\) be an auxiliary BNT sector decomposition with distinct basis tensors \((A_j)_j\). The multiplicity-one unit-weight tensor \(A=\bigoplus _j A_j\) is in literal CPSV canonical form, with retained weights all equal to \(1\), retained blocks \((A_j)_j\), and the identity ambient coisometry. This statement does not reconstruct the raw weighted repeated-copy tensor represented by \(P\).
Let \(P\) be an auxiliary BNT sector decomposition with distinct basis tensors \((A_j)_j\), and let \(A=\bigoplus _j A_j\) be their direct sum with one unit-weight copy of each sector. Then \((A_j)_j\) is a basis of normal tensors for \(A\): every \(A_j\) is a normal tensor, at every positive system length \(N\)
and the states \(\{ |V^{(N)}(A_j)\rangle \} _j\) are linearly independent for all sufficiently large \(N\).
Let \((A_j)_j\) be a family of distinct irreducible left-canonical blocks, no two of which are gauge-phase equivalent, and suppose the direct sum \(\bigoplus _j A_j\) is a renormalization fixed point. Then for every pair of distinct components the mixed transfer operator vanishes, \(\mathcal{E}_{j,j'}=\sum _iA_j^i\otimes \overline{A_{j'}^i}=0\). This is the cross-block (\(\delta _{j,j'}\)) content of the isometry condition of [ CPGSV16 , Theorem 3.11 and Corollary 3.12 ] at the level of the normal-tensor blocks; converting it to the isometries \(U_j\) is a further step left open.
Let \((A_j)_{j=1}^g\) and \((B_j)_{j=1}^g\) be injective families of positive bond dimension satisfying trace-preserving normalization, with self-overlaps tending to \(1\) and off-diagonal overlaps tending to \(0\) within each family. If the spans of the MPV states agree for every system size \(N\), then there is a permutation \(\pi \) of \(\{ 1, \ldots , g\} \) such that \(A_j\) and \(B_{\pi (j)}\) have the same bond dimension and are gauge-phase equivalent.
Let \(P\) be an auxiliary BNT sector decomposition of total bond dimension \(D\), and form the direct sum \(A=\bigoplus _j A_j\) with one unit-weight copy of each BNT basis tensor. There is a positive length \(L\leq 3D^5\) such that, for every basis sector \(j\) and every \(R,l\in M_{D_j}(\mathbb {C})\), a physical observable on \(L\) sites realizes the sector-supported insertion (??). This is the multiplicity-one specialization of the block-injective physical-observable assertion used in [ CPGSV16 , proof of Theorem 3.8 ] , equations (1252) and (1256) in the local source. It does not realize the weighted copy-pair insertions for the full weighted tensor represented by \(P\).
Let \(P\) be a BNT canonical form of total bond dimension \(D\), with representatives \(A_j\) of bond dimensions \(D_j\). For every \(0\leq j{\lt}g\), the representative \(A_j\) is \(D^4\)-block injective: \(S_{D^4}(A_j)=M_{D_j}(\mathbb {C})\).
Let \(A=\bigoplus _k A_k\), and suppose the simultaneous length-\(L\) word evaluations span \(\bigoplus _kM_{D_k}(\mathbb {C})\). For every sector \(j\) and matrices \(R,l\in M_{D_j}(\mathbb {C})\), there is an observable \(O\) on \(L\) sites whose inserted transfer map vanishes on every sector pair except \((j,j)\) and satisfies
In particular, arbitrary virtual matrix-unit maps supported on one sector are realized by physical observables.
Suppose the simultaneous length-\(L\) word evaluations of \((A_j)_j\) span \(\bigoplus _jM_{D_j}(\mathbb {C})\). There are coefficients \(C_{(j,a,b),w}\) such that, for every sector \(k\),
Let \(A\) be \(L_0\)-block-injective, with \(L_0{\gt}0\), and let \(L_0\le M\). Let \(\psi \) be a state on the chain of length \(M+1\), and let the matrices \(Y_i(\tau )\) represent its length-\((L_0+1)\) cyclic restrictions, \(\operatorname{Res}^\tau _{i,L_0+1}(\psi )=\Gamma _{L_0+1}(Y_i(\tau ))\). Fix a boundary letter \(\eta \) and a complementary word \(\mu \). Suppose that, for each physical letter \(j\) and word \(\sigma \) of length \(L_0\), boundary conditions \(\rho ^+_{j,\sigma }\) and \(\rho ^-_{j,\sigma }\) satisfy, for every complementary position \(k\),
If, for every \(j\) and \(\sigma \),
then, for every \(j\) and \(\sigma \),
Let \(A\) be \(L_0\)-block-injective with \(L_0{\gt}0\) and \(D\ge 1\). Let \(\psi \in \mathcal G_{M+1,L_0+1}(A)\) have an open-chain representation \(\psi =\Gamma _{M+1}(X)\). Let \(Y_i(\tau )\) be matrices satisfying \(\operatorname{Res}^{\tau }_{i,L_0+1}(\psi ) = \Gamma _{L_0+1}(Y_i(\tau ))\). If \(L_0{\lt}M\), then for every letter \(\eta \) used in the two boundary conditions, every word \(\mu \) on the complementary sites, and every physical letter \(j\),
This is the one-site product equality used to compare the two boundary matrices in the periodic-boundary comparison.
Let \(A\) be \(L_0\)-block-injective with \(L_0{\gt}0\) and \(D\ge 1\). Let \(\psi \in \mathcal G_{M+1,L_0+1}(A)\) have an open-chain representation \(\psi =\Gamma _{M+1}(X)\). Let \(Y_i(\tau )\) be matrices satisfying \(\operatorname{Res}^{\tau }_{i,L_0+1}(\psi ) = \Gamma _{L_0+1}(Y_i(\tau ))\). If \(L_0{\lt}M\), then for every boundary letter \(\eta \), complementary word \(\mu \), physical letter \(j\), and word \(\sigma \) of length \(L_0\),
Let \(A\) be injective with \(D\ge 1\), and let \(\psi =\Gamma _N(X)\) for some boundary matrix \(X\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\). If every cyclic restriction of length \(L\) of \(\psi \) lies in \(G_L(A)\), with \(N\ge 2\) and \(1{\lt}L\le N\), then \(X A^j=A^jX\) for every \(j=0,\ldots ,d-1\).
Let \(A\) be injective, assume \(u u^\dagger = \mathbb {1}\), and let \(\Lambda \) be a positive definite boundary state with \(\operatorname{tr}(\Lambda )=1\) and \(\mathcal{E}_A^\dagger (\Lambda )=\Lambda \). If \(V\) is a unitary and \(\mu \) a phase satisfying, for every physical index \(i\),
then
Let \(A\) be a left-canonical normal MPS tensor with bond dimension \(D{\gt}0\). Then there is a positive blocking length \(L\le D^4\) such that the blocked tensor \(A^{[L]}\) is one-site injective.
This is the blocked-injectivity form of the quantum Wielandt input used in the Fundamental Theorem for translation-invariant tensors. It corresponds to the statement in [ CPGSV16 , Section II ] that every normal tensor becomes injective after at most \(D^4\) blockings, using the index estimate of [ SPGWC10 , Theorem 1 ] . The left-canonical/trace-preserving hypothesis is included because this is the canonical-form context in which the blocked-injectivity input is used.
Let \(\alpha , \beta : \{ 0, \ldots , n-1\} \to \mathbb {C}\). If \(\sum _i \alpha _i^k = \sum _i \beta _i^k\) for \(1 \le k \le n\), then the multisets \(\{ \alpha _i\} \) and \(\{ \beta _i\} \) are equal.
Two variants relax the equal-cardinality assumption. If \(\alpha : \{ 0, \ldots , m-1\} \to \mathbb {C}\) and \(\beta : \{ 0, \ldots , n-1\} \to \mathbb {C}\) have no zero entries and their power sums agree for \(1 \le k \le \max (m,n)\), then \(m=n\) and the multisets are equal. Without a nonzero hypothesis, the list form \(\sum _{k=1}^{x_a} \lambda _{a,k}^N = \sum _{k=1}^{x_b} \lambda _{b,k}^N\) for \(1 \le N \le \max (x_a,x_b)\) gives equality of the nonzero multisets; if it also holds at \(N=0\) then \(x_a=x_b\) and the full lists agree.
Let \(D {\gt} 0\). Every continuous map from the compact convex set of density matrices in \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) to itself has a fixed point.
Assume \(D{\gt}0\). If \(A\) acts irreducibly on \(\mathbb {C}^D\), then the generated unital subalgebra is the full matrix algebra: \(\operatorname{alg}(A)=M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\). This is the complex finite-dimensional case of Burnside’s theorem (equivalently, Jacobson’s density theorem); see [ Jac09 ] .
Let \((\mu _k,A_k)_{k=1}^r\) be nonzero weights and injective left-canonical blocks with positive bond dimensions, non-increasing moduli \(|\mu _1|\ge \cdots \ge |\mu _r|{\gt}0\), and \(\sigma _\partial (\mathcal{E}_{A_k})=\{ 1\} \). Then \((\mu _k,A_k)_{k=1}^r\) satisfies the auxiliary hypotheses of Definition 24.3.1.1, and \(O_{A_kA_k}(N)\to 1\) for every \(k\).
If \(L\) is CCP and \(P = \mathbb {1}- |\Omega \rangle \! \langle \Omega |\), then
This is [ Wol12 , Proposition 7.2 ] .
Let \(A\) be an irreducible MPS tensor in TP gauge, \(\sum _i(A^i)^\dagger A^i=\mathbb {1}\), with \(D{\gt}0\). Then there exist a unitary \(U\) and a diagonal positive definite \(\Lambda \) such that:
\(B^i:=U^\dagger A^iU\) is TP,
\(\mathcal{E}_B(\Lambda )=\Lambda \),
\(\Lambda \) is diagonal and positive definite,
\(A\) and \(B\) generate the same MPV family.
These are the two normalization identities in the CFII definition of [ CPGSV16 , Appendix A ] . The theorem does not by itself prove that \(A\) is in canonical form or that its block is normal. The unitary conjugation is performed inside TP gauge after TP normalization.
If \(A\) is normal, \(D \ge 1\), and injective after blocking \(L_0{\gt}0\) sites, with \(N \ge 2\), \(L_0+1{\lt}N\), and \(L_0 {\lt} L \le N\), then \(\mathcal G_{N,L}(A) = \operatorname{span}\bigl\{ V^{(N)}(A)\bigr\} \).
Let \(E\) be an irreducible quantum channel on \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) with \(D {\gt} 0\), and let \(\rho \) be any density matrix. Then the Cesàro means (??) converge to the unique positive definite density-matrix fixed point of \(E\). This is the Cesàro-convergence conclusion in the forward direction of [ Wol12 , Corollary 6.3 ] , specialized to quantum channels.
Let \(E\) be an irreducible quantum channel on \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) with \(D {\gt} 0\). Then there exists a unique density matrix \(\sigma \) such that \(E(\sigma ) = \sigma \). The fixed point \(\sigma \) is positive definite. This is the fixed-point conclusion in the forward direction of [ Wol12 , Corollary 6.3 ] , specialized to completely positive trace-preserving maps.
If \(T(\rho )=U\rho U^\dagger \) is a unitary channel, then \(\det T=1\) and hence \(|\det T|=1\).
Every quantum channel \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) admits a Stinespring isometry \(V\) on an ancilla space \(\mathbb {C}^r\) such that
For \(D\geq 1\), every quantum channel \(T\) on \(\mathbb {C}^D\) admits an environment dimension \(r\geq 1\) and a unitary \(U\) on \(\mathbb {C}^D\otimes \mathbb {C}^r\) such that, for every matrix \(\rho \) on \(\mathbb {C}^D\),
Let \(E\) be an irreducible unital trace-preserving Schwarz map on \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) with a positive-definite adjoint fixed point. Let \(\gamma \) be a primitive \(m\)-th root of unity such that the peripheral eigenvalues are exactly \(\{ \gamma ^k:k\in \{ 0,\ldots ,m{-}1\} \} \). Then \(m\mid D\).
For a CPTP map \(T : M_{D}(\mathbb {C}) \to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\),
This is [ Wol12 , Theorem 6.1(2) ] .
If \(L\) is Hermiticity-preserving and \(P((L\otimes \operatorname{id})(|\Omega \rangle \! \langle \Omega |))P \ge 0\), where \(P = \mathbb {1}- |\Omega \rangle \! \langle \Omega |\), then \(L\) is CCP. This is [ Wol12 , Proposition 7.2 ] .
For \(X\in M_{D,k}(\mathbb {C})(\mathbb {C})\) and \(\eta \in \mathbb {C}^D\otimes \mathbb {C}^k\),
Let \(\theta (X)=X^T\) be matrix transposition on \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), with \(D \ge 1\). Then
This is [ Wol12 , Equation 3.1 ] .
For every \(d\ge 3\) and \(n=d-2\), the Choi-type map \(T_C\) sends every positive semidefinite matrix to a positive semidefinite matrix. This is the case \(n=d-2\) of the positivity assertion of Wolf’s Example 3.1 and subsumes the case \(d=3\), \(n=1\).
Let \(X\) and \(Y\) be finite sets and let \(P=(P_{x,y})_{x\in X,y\in Y}\) be a joint probability distribution. With natural logarithms, \(I(X:Y)_P\leq \log \operatorname{rank}_{\mathbb {R}}P\). Equivalently, with logarithms to base two, \(2^{I(X:Y)_P}\leq \operatorname{rank}_{\mathbb {R}}P\).
Let \(A\) be \(L_0\)-block-injective with \(L_0{\gt}0\) and \(D\ge 1\). Let \(\psi \) be a state on the chain of length \(M+1\) with open-chain representation \(\psi =\Gamma _{M+1}(X)\). Let \(Y_i(\tau )\) be matrices satisfying \(\operatorname{Res}^{\tau }_{i,L_0+1}(\psi ) = \Gamma _{L_0+1}(Y_i(\tau ))\). If \(L_0{\lt}M\), then for every nonempty complementary word \(\mu \) there are boundary conditions \(\rho ^+_{j,\sigma }\) and \(\rho ^-_{j,\sigma }\), depending on the physical letter \(j\) and the word \(\sigma \) of length \(L_0\), such that, for every complementary position \(k\),
and, for every \(j\) and \(\sigma \),
Let \(A\) be \(L_0\)-block-injective with \(L_0{\gt}0\), \(L_0{\lt}M\), and \(D\ge 1\). Let \(\psi =\Gamma _{M+1}(X)\) be an open-chain representation, and let \(Y_i(\tau )\) represent the length-\((L_0+1)\) cyclic restrictions of \(\psi \). Fix a complementary word \(\mu \). Suppose that, for every boundary letter \(\eta \), physical letter \(j\), and length-\(L_0\) words \(\sigma ,\alpha \),
Then there are boundary conditions \(\rho ^+_{j,\sigma }\) and \(\rho ^-_{j,\sigma }\) satisfying the complementary-word equations
and the product equation
Let \(A\) be \(L_0\)-block-injective with \(L_0{\gt}0\), \(L_0{\lt}M\), and \(D\ge 1\). Let \(\psi =\Gamma _{M+1}(X)\) and assume that every cyclic restriction of length \(L_0+1\) belongs to \(G_{L_0+1}(A)\). Then there are boundary matrices \(Y_\nu \), indexed by nonempty complementary words \(\nu \) of length \(M+1-(L_0+1)\), such that, for every word \(\alpha \) of length \(L_0\) and every word \(\beta \) of length \(L_0\),
Let \(A\) be \(L_0\)-block-injective with \(L_0{\gt}0\), \(L_0{\lt}M\), and \(D\ge 1\). Let \(\psi =\Gamma _{M+1}(X)\) be an open-chain representation. Assume that, for all \(i\) and \(\tau \), \(\operatorname{Res}^{\tau }_{i,L_0+1}(\psi )\in G_{L_0+1}(A)\). In local coordinate notation, fix a nonempty word \(\mu \) on the sites outside the two cyclic windows. For every outside letter \(\eta \), choose the two outside configurations so that, for each index \(k\) of this outside word,
and put the letter \(\eta \) on the remaining sites. The notation \(\tau ^\pm _\eta (\mu )\) is a coordinate parametrization for the comparison used at the periodic boundary in [ CPGSV21 , Section IV.C, lines 2078–2079 ] ; it is not notation from the source. The corresponding boundary-crossing restriction equality is
Let \(A\) be \(L_0\)-block-injective with \(L_0{\gt}0\), \(L_0\le M\), and \(D\ge 1\). Let \(\psi =\Gamma _{M+1}(X)\) be an open-chain representation, and let \(Y_i(\tau )\) represent the length-\((L_0+1)\) cyclic restrictions of \(\psi \). Fix a complementary word \(\mu \). Suppose that, for every boundary letter \(\eta \), physical letter \(j\), and length-\(L_0\) words \(\alpha ,\sigma \),
Then, for every boundary letter \(\eta \),
Let \(A\) be \(L_0\)-block-injective with \(L_0{\gt}0\), \(L_0{\lt}M\), and \(D\ge 1\). Let \(\psi =\Gamma _{M+1}(X)\) be an open-chain representation, and let \(Y_i(\tau )\) represent the length-\((L_0+1)\) cyclic restrictions of \(\psi \). Fix a nonempty complementary word \(\mu \). Then for every boundary letter \(\eta \), physical letter \(j\), and length-\(L_0\) words \(\alpha ,\sigma \),
Let \(A\) be \(L_0\)-block-injective with \(L_0{\gt}0\), \(L_0{\lt}M\), and \(D\ge 1\). Let \(\psi =\Gamma _{M+1}(X)\) be an open-chain representation, and let \(Y_i(\tau )\) represent the length-\((L_0+1)\) cyclic restrictions of \(\psi \). Fix a nonempty complementary word \(\mu \). Then for every boundary letter \(\eta \), physical letter \(j\), and length-\(L_0\) words \(\alpha ,\sigma \),
The length-\(2\) blocked cluster transfer map satisfies \(\mathcal{E}_A^2 = \mathcal{E}_A\). In closed form, it sends every \(X\) to the scalar \((X_{00} + X_{11})/2\) times the identity, so its image is one-dimensional.
The cluster-state factor system (Theorem 17.5.9), built from the anticommuting gauges \(\sigma _z\) and \(\sigma _x\) (Theorem 17.5.6), is not a coboundary: its commutator phase on the two generators is \(-1\). Its class in \(H^2(\mathbb {Z}_2 \times \mathbb {Z}_2, \mathrm{U}(1)) \cong \mathbb {Z}_2\) is therefore non-trivial, so the cluster state realizes a non-trivial SPT phase.
The cluster-state tensor is not injective: \(\operatorname{span}_{\mathbb {C}}\{ A^0, A^1\} = \operatorname{span}_{\mathbb {C}}\{ |+\rangle \! \langle 0|, |-\rangle \! \langle 1|\} \) has dimension \(2\), not \(\dim M_{2}(\mathbb {C}) = 4\).
For every element \(g\) of \(\mathbb {Z}_2 \times \mathbb {Z}_2\), the length-\(2\) blocked cluster-state tensor has string order in the sense of Definition 12.3.11 for the twist by \(g\), with the maximally mixed boundary state \(\Lambda = \tfrac {1}{2}\mathbb {1}\) as its stationary boundary state.
The length-\(2\) blocked cluster-state tensor is on-site symmetric under \(\mathbb {Z}_2 \times \mathbb {Z}_2\). The two generators act on the \(4\)-dimensional blocked physical space \((\mathbb {C}^2)^{\otimes 2}\) by \(\sigma _x \otimes \mathbb {1}\) and \(\mathbb {1}\otimes \sigma _x\), which commute and each square to the identity, defining a linear representation of \(\mathbb {Z}_2 \times \mathbb {Z}_2\).
The length-\(2\) blocked cluster tensor has zero correlation length: its idempotent transfer map (Theorem 17.5.12) gives correlations independent of the separation. Like the GHZ state, and unlike the AKLT state, the cluster state is a renormalization fixed point with zero correlation length.
If the bond dimension satisfies \(D \ge 1\) and two projective representations \(\rho _1,\rho _2\) (with cocycles \(\omega _1,\omega _2\)) both arise as virtual representations of the same injective MPS tensor \(A\) under an on-site symmetry \(U\), then \(\omega _2\sim \omega _1\), and hence also \(\omega _1\sim \omega _2\) by symmetry.
For every original block \(B_k\), direct blocking at the common length \(p=m_ke_k\) agrees, as an MPV family, with the same block transported to the common blocked alphabet. Write \(\widetilde{B}_k\) for this common-alphabet image. Then
Each sector tensor in the common reblocked cyclic-sector family of Lemma E.5.5 is trace-preserving, \(\sum _i(B^i)^\dagger B^i=\mathbb {1}\), has primitive transfer map, \(\sigma _\partial (\mathcal{E}_B)=\{ 1\} \), is tensor-irreducible, and has positive bond dimension.
The powered nonzero-part decomposition \(\bigoplus _k\mu _k^pB_k^{[p]}\) carries over under the common-alphabet identification of Lemma E.5.8: the common-alphabet sectors have the same nonzero-part decomposition as the direct \(p\)-blocked tensors.
With \(p=m_ke_k\) for each \(k\), the iterated blocked tensor \((B_k^{[m_k]})^{[e_k]}\) agrees with \(B_k^{[p]}\) in MPV family, after the canonical identification of the \(p\)-blocked alphabet \(d^{[p]}\) with the \(e_k\)-fold tensor power of the \(m_k\)-blocked alphabet \(d^{[m_k]}\).
Let \((B_k)_{k=1}^r\) be a finite family of positive-bond-dimension MPS tensors, each admitting a blocking period \(p_k\) making its transfer map primitive. Then \(p=\operatorname{lcm}(p_1,\ldots ,p_r)\) is a common period: \(\mathcal{E}_{B_k^{[p]}}\) is primitive for every \(k\).
Let \((B_k)_{k=1}^r\) be a finite family of positive-bond-dimension, left-canonical, tensor-irreducible MPS tensors. Then there is a single blocking length \(p{\gt}0\) such that \(\mathcal{E}_{B_k^{[p]}}\) is primitive for every \(k\).
Let \((B_k)_{k=1}^r\) be a finite family of positive-bond-dimension MPS tensors, each trace-preserving, primitive, and tensor-irreducible. Then there is a single \(L\ge 1\) such that each \(B_k^{[L]}\) is one-site injective, and this blocking preserves trace preservation, primitivity, and irreducibility for every block.
If an observable commutes with \(H\), with every \(L_j\), and with every \(L_j^\dagger \), then it lies in \(\ker (L^*)\).
If \(P_{AX}\) and \(P_{XB}\) are idempotent endomorphisms satisfying \(P_{AX}\circ P_{XB}=P_K\) and \(P_{AX}\circ P_{XB}=P_{XB}\circ P_{AX}\), and \(A\)-observables commute with \(P_{XB}\) while \(B\)-observables commute with \(P_{AX}\), then regions \(A\) and \(B\) are decorrelated w.r.t. \(K\). This is the idempotent-product form of the backward direction of [ CPGSV16 , Appendix D, Section D.2, Proposition D.3 ] .
Let \(X_{AB}\in \mathbf L(H_A\otimes H_B)\) and \(Y_{BC}\in \mathbf L(H_B\otimes H_C)\) be Hermitian, and suppose \([X_{AB}\otimes \mathbb {1}_C,\mathbb {1}_A\otimes Y_{BC}]=0\). There are positive integers \(d_q,m_q\), an identification \(H_B\cong \bigoplus _{q=0}^{K-1}H_{q,l}\otimes H_{q,r}\), a unitary \(U\in \mathbf L(H_B)\), and Hermitian operators \(R_q\in \mathbf L(H_A\otimes H_{q,l})\) and \(S_q\in \mathbf L(H_{q,r}\otimes H_C)\) such that
In these formulas the two direct sums are transported to the original product coordinates through the stated identification. These are the two equalities in [ Bei12 , Lemma 2.1 ] . The operators \(R_q\) and \(S_q\) are Hermitian; they are not asserted to be unitary.
Let \(X_{AB}\in \mathbf L(H_A\otimes H_B)\) and \(Y_{BC}\in \mathbf L(H_B\otimes H_C)\), with \(Y_{BC}\) Hermitian, and suppose \([X_{AB}\otimes \mathbb {1}_C,\mathbb {1}_A\otimes Y_{BC}]=0\). There is an orthonormal decomposition \(H_B\cong \bigoplus _{q=0}^{K-1}H_{q,r}\otimes H_{q,l}\) such that all middle-factor coefficients \(X_{aa'}\) act only on \(H_{q,l}\), while all middle-factor coefficients \(Y_{cc'}\) act only on \(H_{q,r}\). More precisely, in an orthonormal basis \((e_{q,r,s})\) adapted to this decomposition,
The source lemma assumes that both overlapping operators are Hermitian; the coefficient conclusion requires Hermiticity only for \(Y_{BC}\). This is the middle-space coefficient form of [ Bei12 , Lemma 2.1 ] .
Let \(X_{AB}\in \mathbf L(H_A\otimes H_B)\) and \(Y_{BC}\in \mathbf L(H_B\otimes H_C)\). For fixed outer indices, define their middle-factor coefficient matrices by
If
then \(X_{aa'}Y_{cc'}=Y_{cc'}X_{aa'}\) for every \(a,a',c,c'\). This is the coefficientwise commutation step in the proof of [ Bei12 , Lemma 2.1 ] .
Let \(X_{AB}\in \mathbf L(H_A\otimes H_B)\) and \(Y_{BC}\in \mathbf L(H_B\otimes H_C)\) be Hermitian, and suppose \([X_{AB}\otimes \mathbb {1}_C,\mathbb {1}_A\otimes Y_{BC}]=0\). There are positive integers \(d_q,m_q\), a unitary identification \(H_B\cong \bigoplus _{q=0}^{K-1}H_{q,l}\otimes H_{q,r}\), and Hermitian operators \(R_q\in \mathbf L(H_A\otimes H_{q,l})\) and \(S_q\in \mathbf L(H_{q,r}\otimes H_C)\) such that
This is the explicit coordinate form of the two block-action identities in [ Bei12 , Lemma 2.1 ] .
Let \(B\geq 0\) be a two-site operator whose overlapping placements commute: \((B\otimes \mathbb {1})(\mathbb {1}\otimes B) = (\mathbb {1}\otimes B)(B\otimes \mathbb {1})\). There are positive integers \(d_{q,l},d_{q,r}\), a one-site unitary \(U\), and positive semidefinite operators \(\eta _{q,h}\) on \(\mathcal H_{q,r}\otimes \mathcal H_{h,l}\) such that
This is the symmetric two-sided form obtained from [ Bei12 , Lemma 2.1 and Section III, equation (2) ] .
Let a left-canonical tensor \(A\) commute with a family of orthogonal projections \((P_k)\) summing to \(\mathbb {1}\). Then \(A\) decomposes into compressed sector tensors \((C_k)\), with a unit-weight direct-sum MPV decomposition, corner isomorphisms \(\varphi _k:M_{\dim C_k}(\mathbb {C})\xrightarrow {\sim }P_kM_{D}(\mathbb {C})P_k\), and rectangular isometries \(V_k\) satisfying
The sector letters obey \(\varphi _k(C_k^i)=P_kA^iP_k\).
Apply Theorem E.5.1 to the compression of \(A\) on each sector \(P_k\). Orthogonality and \(\sum _kP_k=\mathbb {1}\) give the direct-sum decomposition. For every word \(\sigma =(\sigma _1,\ldots ,\sigma _N)\), the partition of unity and (??) give
This is the unit-weight matrix-product-vector identity.
Let \(P\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be an orthogonal projection of rank \(n\). The corner algebra \(PM_{D}(\mathbb {C})P\) is linearly isomorphic to the full matrix algebra \(M_{n}(\mathbb {C})\). The isomorphism is built from the spectral diagonalisation of \(P\) by conjugating the top-left \(n\times n\) block by the unitary diagonalising \(P\).
Let \(\rho \succeq 0\) on \(\mathbb {C}^D\), with support projection \(P=\operatorname{supp}(\rho )\), and let \(V:\mathbb {C}^D\to \mathbb {C}^k\) be a compression isometry satisfying \(VV^\dagger =\mathbb {1}_k\) and \(V^\dagger V=P\). Then \(V\rho V^\dagger \in M_{k}(\mathbb {C})\) is positive definite.
Assume that \(A\) is one-site injective, \(VV^\dagger =\mathbb {1}\), and the transfer map is covariant. Then there is \(u\) with \(uu^\dagger =\mathbb {1}\) satisfying the local physical intertwining relation. In fact, covariance and \(VV^\dagger =\mathbb {1}\) alone imply the conclusion; the injectivity hypothesis is unnecessary.
Let \(A\) be injective after blocking \(L_0{\gt}0\) sites and let \(D \ge 1\). Assume \(N \ge 2\) and \(L_0 {\lt} L \le N\). Suppose that, for every physical letter \(\eta \) used in the two boundary conditions and every boundary matrix obtained from an \(N\)-site chain ground state, the identities
hold for every physical letter \(j\) and every complementary word \(\mu \), and are supplemented, for every \(\mu \), by \(Y^+_{\tau ^+_\eta (\mu )} = Y^-_{\tau ^-_\eta (\mu )}\). Then \(\mathcal G_{N,L}(A)\subseteq \operatorname{span}\{ V^{(N)}(A)\} \).
For every \(X\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), the conjugation filter \(\rho \mapsto X\rho X^\dagger \) is completely positive, hence positive. Therefore, if \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) is positive, then \(\rho \mapsto T(X\rho X^\dagger )\) is positive. If in addition \(X^\dagger X=\mathbb {1}\), then the conjugation filter is trace-preserving and hence is a quantum channel.
Let \(Y\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be invertible. Then the map \(X\mapsto YXY^\dagger \) and the map \(X\mapsto YX^TY^\dagger \) each map the positive semidefinite cone onto itself. This is the implication (3) \(\Rightarrow \) (1) of [ Wol12 , Proposition 3.8 ] .
Every norm-continuous dynamical semigroup \(T\) on \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) is of the form \(T_t = e^{tL}\) for some generator \(L \in \operatorname{End}_{\mathbb {C}}(M_{D}(\mathbb {C}))\) and every \(t \ge 0\). This is [ Wol12 , Proposition 7.1 ] .
Let \(E(X)=\sum _iK_iXK_i^\dagger \) be a trace-preserving Kraus map on \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), with Heisenberg-picture adjoint \(E^*(Y)=\sum _iK_i^\dagger YK_i\), let \(\rho \succeq 0\) satisfy \(E(\rho )=\rho \), and let \(Q\) be the support projection of \(\rho \). There are a sector dimension \(r\leq D\), a number \(n\) of blocks, positive dimensions \(d_0,\ldots ,d_{n-1}\) and multiplicities \(m_0,\ldots ,m_{n-1}\) with \(\sum _kd_km_k=r\), realized by an explicit identification of the index sets, and an isometry \(W:\mathbb {C}^r\to \mathbb {C}^D\) with \(W^\dagger W=\mathbb {1}_r\) and \(WW^\dagger =Q\), such that a matrix \(Y\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) satisfies \(QYQ=Y\) and \(QE^*(Y)Q=Y\) exactly when
for some matrices \(B_k\in M_{d_k}(\mathbb {C})\); that is, up to reordering the two tensor factors of each block,
The right-hand side is the support-sector block representation in Equation (1.39) of [ Wol12 ] ; the equivalence characterizes the corner-restricted set, not the ambient fixed-point space.
Let \(T(X)=\sum _iK_iXK_i^\dagger \) be trace-preserving, let its adjoint \(T^*(Y)=\sum _iK_i^\dagger YK_i\) satisfy the Schwarz inequality, let \(\rho \succeq 0\) satisfy \(T(\rho )=\rho \), and let \(Q=\operatorname{supp}(\rho )\). Then
is a \(*\)-subalgebra of the corner algebra \(QM_{D}(\mathbb {C})Q\).
For an injective trace-preserving MPS tensor, there exist \(C{\gt}0\) and \(\xi {\gt}0\) such that, for all \(n\ge 0\) and all traceless \(X\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), i.e. \(\operatorname{tr}(X)=0\),
Traceless matrices lie in \(\ker P\), where \(P\) is the fixed-point projection (??). Since \(\mathcal{E}_A-P\) has spectral radius strictly less than \(1\), choose any \(r\) with \(\rho (\mathcal{E}_A-P){\lt}r{\lt}1\). The Gelfand formula then gives exponential decay with \(\xi =-1/\log r\). Choosing a rate strictly above the spectral radius is necessary in general because a Jordan block at the spectral radius can prevent a uniform bound proportional to \(\rho (\mathcal{E}_A-P)^n\).
If a constant \(C_{XY}\in \mathbb {R}\) and \(\lambda _2\in \mathbb {C}\) satisfy, for all \(n\ge 0\),
then the connected correlator satisfies that exponential decay bound. The source [ CPGSV21 , Section II.B.3 ] obtains this by combining the sum-of-exponentials expansion with the triangle inequality, while under the primitive or injective hypotheses stated in Chapter 7, the transfer-map gap results ensure that the subleading eigenvalues lie strictly inside the unit disk.
If coefficients \(c_j\in \mathbb {C}\) and eigenvalues \(\lambda _j\in \mathbb {C}\), for \(j=1,\ldots ,D^2-1\), satisfy, for all \(n\ge 0\),
then the connected correlator equals the stated sum of exponentials. The source [ CPGSV21 , Section II.B.3 ] states that the connected correlator is a sum of \(D^2-1\) pure exponentials, \(C(X,Y;n)=\sum _{j\ge 2}^{D^2}c_{XY}(j)\lambda _j^n\). This pure-exponential representation follows when the relevant subleading spectral data of the transfer map are diagonalizable. For a non-diagonalizable transfer map, nontrivial Jordan blocks can instead produce terms of the form \(n^k\lambda ^n\). Accordingly, the pure-exponential formula is retained here as an explicit interface hypothesis rather than asserted for every normal MPS.
For any finite Kraus-like families \(\{ A_i\} , \{ B_i\} \), the map \(T(X) = \sum _i A_i X B_i^\dagger \) satisfies \(4\, T = T_1 - T_2 + i\, T_3 - i\, T_4\) with each \(T_k\) a CP map given explicitly by a single-side Kraus sum of the combined families.
Let \(T_1,T_2:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be CP maps with \(T_1\le T_2\). Then there exist ancilla dimensions \(r_1,m\), Heisenberg-form Stinespring matrices \(V_1:\mathbb {C}^D\to \mathbb {C}^D\otimes \mathbb {C}^{r_1}\) and \(V_2:\mathbb {C}^D\to \mathbb {C}^D\otimes \mathbb {C}^m\) realizing \(T_1,T_2\) via \(T_i(A)=V_i^\dagger (A\otimes \mathbb {1})V_i\), and a rectangular contraction \(\widetilde C:\mathbb {C}^m\to \mathbb {C}^{r_1}\) with \(\widetilde C^\dagger \widetilde C\le \mathbb {1}_m\) such that
This is [ Wol12 , Theorem 2.3 ] .
Let \(T_1,T_2:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be completely positive. There exist an ancilla dimension \(m\), a Kraus family \(K\) with Stinespring matrix \(V=V_K\), and positive semidefinite operators \(P_1,P_2:\mathbb {C}^m\to \mathbb {C}^m\) with \(P_1+P_2=\mathbb {1}_m\) such that, for \(i=1,2\) and every \(A\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\),
Let \(E : M_{D}(\mathbb {C}) \to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be completely positive in the Kraus sense. For every \(k\) and every positive block matrix \(M \in M_k(M_{D}(\mathbb {C}))\), the entrywise image \((E(M_{ab}))_{a,b}\) is again positive in \(M_k(M_{D}(\mathbb {C}))\).
Let \(\{ T_i\} _{i\in I}\) be a nonempty finite family of completely positive maps, let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) satisfy \(\sum _{i\in I}T_i=T\), and suppose that \(T\) has a supplied Stinespring representation
Then there are positive semidefinite operators \(P_i\in M_{r}(\mathbb {C})\) with
For every \(i\in I\) and \(A\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\),
This is [ Wol12 , Theorem 2.4 ] , with the nonempty-family condition made explicit; see docs/paper-gaps/wolf_radon_nikodym_nonempty_family.tex.
Let \(P\) and \(Q\) be BNT canonical forms (Definition 10.6.1.11) whose total tensors \(P_{\mathrm{tot}}\), \(Q_{\mathrm{tot}}\) generate the same MPV family for every positive system size \(N\). Then their total bond dimensions coincide; writing the common value as \(D\), there is one invertible matrix \(X\in \mathrm{GL}_D(\mathbb {C})\) such that, for every physical index \(i\),
This is [ CPGSV16 , Corollary 2.11 ] on the normalized BNT surface; the literal source surface is reached by the reduction and normalization of Chapters 9 and 10. Moreover, the canonical form of [ CPGSV16 , Section 2.3 ] , a direct sum of normal tensors with scalar weights, is a BNT canonical form. The reduction of an arbitrary pair of same-MPV tensors to a common BNT canonical form is Chapter 9.
Let \(P\) and \(Q\) be BNT canonical forms (Definition 10.6.1.11), with bases of normal tensors \((P_j)_{j=1}^{g_a}\) and \((Q_k)_{k=1}^{g_b}\). If the total tensors \(P_{\mathrm{tot}}\), \(Q_{\mathrm{tot}}\) generate eventually nonzero proportional MPV families — for all sufficiently large \(N\) there is a nonzero scalar \(c_N\) with \(V^{(N)}(P_{\mathrm{tot}})=c_NV^{(N)}(Q_{\mathrm{tot}})\) — then \(g_a=g_b\). After relabelling the basis of normal tensors of \(P\) by a bijection \(\beta :J(Q)\simeq J(P)\), there are scalars \(\zeta _k\in \mathbb {C}\) with \(|\zeta _k|=1\) and invertible matrices \(Y_k\) such that, for every \(k\) and every physical index \(i\),
Thus the paired normal tensors have the same bond dimension (\(\dim P_{\beta (k)}=\dim Q_k\)) and the same gauge-phase class.
In the notation of Theorem 10.6.1.9, let \(k(j,q)\in K_{\mathrm{act}}\) be the listed block corresponding to the class-copy pair \((j,q)\). The active representatives \(C_j\) define a sector decomposition \(P_{\mathrm{act}}\) with copy weights
Every copy weight in \(P_{\mathrm{act}}\) is nonzero. The representatives have simultaneous word-tuple separation at every sufficiently large length.
The sector decomposition contains only the active class-copy pairs. The full grouped tensor \(T_{\mathrm{grp}}\) of Theorem 10.6.1.9 still contains every inactive zero-weight listed coordinate. For every positive length \(N\), the two tensors generate the same matrix product vector:
No equality at length zero is asserted, since deleting inactive bond coordinates changes the empty-word coefficient.
Let \((A_j)_{j=1}^g\) be a basis of normal tensors, with bond dimensions \(D_j\). There is a positive integer \(L\) such that the one-letter evaluations of the blocked tensors span the full product algebra:
Moreover, there is \(L_0\) such that, for every \(L\geq L_0\), the unblocked word tuples have the simultaneous span
This is the existence form of simultaneous block injectivity associated with [ CPGSV16 , lines 317–345 ] ; no numerical bound on \(L\) or \(L_0\) is asserted here.
Let \(A\) have a canonical-form MPV expansion
at every positive length, where the tensors \(\widetilde A_k\) are normal tensors of positive bond dimension. Set \(K_{\mathrm{act}}=\{ k:\mu _k\ne 0\} \). Let \((A_j)_{j=1}^{g}\) be tensors of positive bond dimension. Then \((A_j)_{j=1}^{g}\) is a basis of normal tensors for \(A\) if and only if:
every \(A_j\) is normal;
for every \(k\in K_{\mathrm{act}}\) there are an index \(j\), an invertible matrix \(X_k\), and a phase \(e^{i\phi _k}\) such that \(\widetilde A_k^i=e^{i\phi _k}X_kA_j^iX_k^{-1}\) for every physical index \(i\);
no two distinct tensors \(A_j\) and \(A_{j'}\) are related in this way.
This is [ CPGSV16 , Proposition 2.7 ] , with the following necessary local correction.
Local fix (active blocks): the coverage clause is restricted to \(K_{\mathrm{act}}\). The literal source canonical-form display permits \(\mu _k=0\), but such a summand contributes nothing to any positive-length MPV and therefore cannot be recovered from the BNT spanning property. Removing the zero-weight summands leaves every positive-length MPV unchanged and restores the nonzero-weight hypothesis of the source phase-class argument. The comparison is recorded in docs/paper-gaps/cpsv16_bnt_characterization_active_blocks.tex.
If \((A_j)_{j=1}^{g}\) is a coefficient-form basis of normal tensors for \(A\), then \((A_j)_{j=1}^{g}\) is an algebraic basis of normal tensors for \(A\). Only this implication from spectral normality to algebraic normality is asserted.
Let \(A\) have a canonical-form MPV expansion
at every positive length, where the tensors \(\widetilde A_k\) are normal and have positive bond dimensions. Let \((A_j)_{j=0}^{g_1-1}\) and \((B_l)_{l=0}^{g_2-1}\) be two bases of normal tensors for \(A\), all of whose members have positive bond dimensions. Assume that every \(A_j\) and every \(B_l\) is related by a phase and an invertible gauge to a block \(\widetilde A_k\) with \(\mu _k\ne 0\). Then there is a bijection \(e:\{ 0,\ldots ,g_1-1\} \to \{ 0,\ldots ,g_2-1\} \) such that the bond dimensions of \(A_j\) and \(B_{e(j)}\) agree and \(B_{e(j)}^i=\zeta _jX_jA_j^iX_j^{-1}\), with \(|\zeta _j|=1\), for every \(j\) and every physical index \(i\).
There is a normal tensor with a one-block canonical-form expansion which admits two bases of normal tensors of different cardinalities. Hence the unrestricted uniqueness sentence of [ CPGSV16 , Appendix A, line 1148 ] does not follow from the literal definition of a basis of normal tensors.
Let
be literal CPSV canonical-form data. Put \(K_{\mathrm{act}}=\{ k:\mu _k\ne 0\} \) and \(K_0=\{ k:\mu _k=0\} \). There are phase classes \(j\), copy multiplicities \(r_j\), and an equivalence
Its active restriction identifies the class-copy pairs with \(K_{\mathrm{act}}\). Each class has a representative \(C_j\). If the copy \((j,q)\) corresponds to \(k\in K_{\mathrm{act}}\), then its bond dimension equals that of \(C_j\) and there are \(\zeta _k\in \mathbb {C}\), with \(|\zeta _k|=1\), and \(X_k\in \mathrm{GL}_{D_k}(\mathbb {C})\) such that
The copy retains the original coefficient \(\mu _k\), and the representatives \((C_j)_j\) form a basis of normal tensors for \(A\).
Enumerate \(\mathcal G\). The induced equivalence \(\Phi \) between the dependent grouped block coordinates and the original flattened listed coordinates gives
For \(x=(j,q)\), let \(\widehat\mu _x\) be the original weight of that copy and let \(\widehat B_x^i=\zeta _xC_j^i\), with the required dimension identification. For \(x\in K_0\), let \(\widehat\mu _x=0\) and retain the original block \(\widehat B_x=A_x\). Define the grouped tensor by
If \(G=\bigoplus _kY_k\) is the block-diagonal gauge, with \(Y_k=X_k\) on active indices and \(Y_k=\mathbb {1}\) on \(K_0\), then, letter by letter,
and
Thus the class-copy coordinates and the inactive complement are explicit, while every zero-weight listed block remains present. No deletion of the inactive coordinates and no coisometric selector onto the active part is asserted.
- MPSTensor.CPSVCanonicalFormData.ActiveBNTRefinement
- MPSTensor.CPSVCanonicalFormData.exists_activeBNTRefinement
- MPSTensor.CPSVCanonicalFormData.activeClassCopyEquiv
- MPSTensor.CPSVCanonicalFormData.Inactive
- MPSTensor.CPSVCanonicalFormData.GroupedIndex
- MPSTensor.CPSVCanonicalFormData.groupedIndexEquiv
- MPSTensor.CPSVCanonicalFormData.groupedCoordinateEquiv
- MPSTensor.CPSVCanonicalFormData.groupedTotalDim_eq
- MPSTensor.CPSVCanonicalFormData.ActiveBNTRefinement.groupedWeight
- MPSTensor.CPSVCanonicalFormData.ActiveBNTRefinement.groupedBlocks
- MPSTensor.CPSVCanonicalFormData.ActiveBNTRefinement.groupedTensor
- MPSTensor.CPSVCanonicalFormData.ActiveBNTRefinement.regroupedTensor_eq_groupedTensor
- MPSTensor.CPSVCanonicalFormData.ActiveBNTRefinement.groupedRegroupLetterwise
- MPSTensor.CPSVCanonicalFormData.ActiveBNTRefinement.reconstructGrouped
- MPSTensor.blockIndexCoordinateEquiv
- MPSTensor.toTensorFromBlocks_eq_reindex_blockDiagonal_equiv
Let \(A\) have canonical-form data as in (??), and let \((B_j)_{j=1}^{g}\) have positive bond dimensions. With \(K_{\mathrm{act}}=\{ k:\mu _k\ne 0\} \), the family \((B_j)_{j=1}^{g}\) is a basis of normal tensors for \(A\) if and only if
Each displayed conjugacy also requires the two bond dimensions to agree, and every scalar \(e^{i\phi }\) has modulus one. This is [ CPGSV16 , Proposition 2.7 and Appendix A ] , specialized to the literal canonical-form data.
Local fix (active blocks): coverage in (??) applies only to listed blocks with \(\mu _k\ne 0\). The display defining canonical form permits \(\mu _k=0\), and a zero-weight block contributes nothing to any positive-length matrix product vector. Thus the theorem does not claim coverage of every syntactically listed block. The comparison is recorded in docs/paper-gaps/cpsv16_bnt_characterization_active_blocks.tex.
Every tensor with literal CPSV canonical-form data admits a finite basis of normal tensors \((B_j)_{j=1}^{g}\), each of positive bond dimension. The family is obtained from \(K_{\mathrm{act}}=\{ k:\mu _k\ne 0\} \) by choosing one representative from each matrix-product-vector phase class of the active blocks.
This statement does not cover zero-weight listed blocks: they contribute nothing to any positive-length matrix product vector. It also makes no unrestricted uniqueness claim about arbitrary bases of normal tensors.
For canonical-form data as in (??), every positive length \(N\) and every configuration \(\sigma \) satisfy
Equivalently, \(|V^{(N)}(A)\rangle =\sum _{k=1}^{r}\mu _k^N|V^{(N)}(A_k)\rangle \). This is the identity immediately following the canonical-form definition in [ CPGSV16 , Section 2.3 ] .
For every tensor \(A\), there are a positive integer \(p\), a bond dimension \(D'\), and a tensor \(B\) of physical dimension \(d^p\) and bond dimension \(D'\) such that \(B\in \mathrm{CF}\) and, for every \(N\ge 1\),
Here \(B\) is another tensor generating the same positive-length MPV family. The assertion \(B\in \mathrm{CF}\) is literal in the bond coordinates of \(B\); no assertion is made that \(A^{[p]}\) itself is literally in canonical form in its original bond coordinates.
Let \(A\) be a tensor in CPSV canonical form, with ambient bond dimension \(D\). Then there is a tensor \(B\) of the same bond dimension and an \(G\in \mathrm{GL}(D,\mathbb {C})\) such that, for every physical index \(i\),
Moreover, \(B\) is in canonical form II. This is the nonsingular gauge assertion of [ CPGSV16 , Appendix A ] .
CPSV asserts that a tensor \(A\) in canonical form is a renormalization fixed point if and only if it can be written as
where \(|\mu _{j,q}|=1\), each \(\rho _j\) is positive diagonal with \(\operatorname{tr}(\rho _j)=1\), and
The source specifies that \(\bigoplus _{j,q}\) is a simultaneous direct sum in the physical and virtual spaces, not an ordinary virtual block diagonal at each fixed physical letter \(i\) [ CPGSV16 , Theorem 3.11, lines 561–562 ] . It does not provide a coordinate map for the physical routing of \(q\), a corresponding dimension hypothesis, or a \(q\)-indexed isometry equation. Consequently the display does not yet determine a source-faithful coordinate-level predicate. Under the naive fixed-\(i\) virtual-block interpretation, the claimed converse is false by Theorem 24.4.19. The routed characterization therefore remains not ready pending a source clarification or erratum.
Local fix (square-root diagonal). CPSV prints a bare \(\Lambda _j\) in Theorem 3.11, whereas the reference tensor at line 1300 has coefficients \(\sqrt{(\rho _j)_{\alpha ,\alpha }}\), which forces the factor \(\sqrt{\rho _j}\) used above. This repair is documented in docs/paper-gaps/cpsv16_rfp_isometry_scope.tex.
Let \(T_{\mathrm{grp}}\) be the full grouped tensor of Theorem 10.6.1.9, and let \(P_{\mathrm{act}}\) be its active representative sector decomposition. For a marked family \((C_j^s)_j\), define the marked tensor \(\widehat C_{\mathrm{grp}}\) on all grouped listed coordinates as follows. The active copy \((j,q)\) carries the marked block \(\lambda _{j,q}C_j^s\), where \(\lambda _{j,q}=\nu _{k(j,q)}\zeta _{k(j,q)}\), and every inactive listed coordinate carries the zero block. Thus all original listed coordinates remain present.
For every marked letter \(s\) and every unmarked word \(w\), one has
The exponent \(|w|+1\) includes the factor at the marked site. Inactive coordinates contribute zero.
Let \(M\) be an MPO tensor whose doubled-index MPS tensor is in literal CPSV canonical form. If \(Q^2=Q\) and \(Q\widetilde M\ne Q\widetilde M Q\), then there is an integer \(N\geq 0\) such that, for \(Q_1=Q\otimes \mathbb {1}^{\otimes N}\),
Thus a displaced idempotent has a noncommuting chain length. The proof of [ CPGSV16 , Proposition 4.13, lines 1888–1893 ] only requires this existential conclusion, not noncommutation at every length.
Consider the actual phase-class grouping furnished under literal CPSV canonical form. For a class \(\alpha \) and copy \(q\), identify its normal representative with the bond space of that copy using the equality of dimensions. Then
for every vertical letter \(v\).
In the actual phase-class grouping under literal CPSV canonical form, every gauge \(X_{\alpha ,q}\) has a positive real Gram scalar \(\omega _{\alpha ,q}\) such that
Consequently \(U_{\alpha ,q}=\omega _{\alpha ,q}^{-1/2}X_{\alpha ,q}\) is unitary. This proves the gauge-normalization step of [ CPGSV16 , Proposition 4.13, lines 1903–1921 ] and supplies the positive Gram scalars used to normalize the physical sector maps.
In the phase-class grouping obtained from literal CPSV canonical form, let \(Q_{\alpha ,q}=\omega _{\alpha ,q}^{-1/2}X_{\alpha ,q}\) and \(W_{\alpha ,q}=V_{\alpha ,q}Q_{\alpha ,q}\), after identifying the bond space of each copy with that of its representative. Then
where \(c_{\alpha ,q}=\nu _{\alpha ,q}\zeta _{\alpha ,q}{\gt}0\). Moreover, every vertical letter is reconstructed exactly:
Let \(M\) be an MPO tensor whose doubled-index MPS tensor is in the literal CPSV canonical form, and suppose that \(M\) generates positive semidefinite operators on every nonempty chain. Let \(A\) be a tensor, let \(X\) and \(Y\) be invertible matrices, and suppose that two vertical corners satisfy
Then the Gram-dressed tensors agree:
for every vertical letter \(v\).
Let \(M\) be an MPO tensor whose doubled-index MPS tensor is in the literal CPSV canonical form, and suppose that \(M\) generates positive semidefinite operators on every nonempty chain. Let \(A\) be normal, let \(X\) and \(Y\) be invertible matrices, and suppose that
Then there is a real number \(\omega {\gt}0\) such that
Let \(M\) be an MPO tensor whose doubled-index MPS tensor is in literal CPSV canonical form, and let \(P\in M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\). If one vertical letter has a nonzero two-sided corner, then some finite-chain first-site compression is nonzero:
where \(P_1=P\otimes \mathbb {1}^{\otimes N}\). This is the separation assertion at [ CPGSV16 , Proposition 4.13, line 1898 ] , obtained from Lemma L in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.3, lines 1835–1858 ] . It uses neither positivity of \(H^{(N+1)}\) nor a grouping of the vertical sectors.
Under the same hypotheses, partition the normalized vertical sectors by equality of their matrix product vector families up to a fixed nonzero scalar per site. There are normal representatives \(M_\alpha \), an enumeration \(k=(\alpha ,q)\) of the original sectors, invertible matrices \(X_{\alpha ,q}\), and complex numbers \(\zeta _{\alpha ,q}\) of unit modulus, with \(X_{\alpha ,1}=\mathbb {1}\) and \(\zeta _{\alpha ,1}=1\), such that
The representatives are pairwise gauge-phase distinct and form a basis of normal tensors for the weighted block tensor \(\bigoplus _k\nu _kB_k\). Every grouped coefficient \(\nu _{\alpha ,q}\zeta _{\alpha ,q}\) is positive. With the physical isometries from Theorem 23.4.88 retained unchanged, one has both reducing identities, exact compression, and the literal reconstruction
For each pair \((\alpha ,q)\), the range projector of \(V_{\alpha ,q}\) obeys the representative-loop identity and gives a nonzero compression at some finite length. This is the decomposition and positivity argument of [ CPGSV16 , Proposition 4.13, lines 1898–1902 ] . The relative Gram identity and proportional-unitary normalization of lines 1903–1908 are not asserted here.
CPSV asserts that, for a tensor \(A\) in canonical form, the following are equivalent: \(A\) is a renormalization fixed point; \(A\) has physical zero correlation length; and, for every \(N{\gt}2\), the vector \(|V^{(N)}(A)\rangle \) belongs to the ground space of a nearest-neighbor commuting parent Hamiltonian [ CPGSV16 , Theorem 3.10 ] .
This three-way equivalence is false with the unrestricted physical zero-correlation-length definition. The Bell-pair chain is a single normal block and becomes a literal CPSV canonical-form tensor by taking unit weight and the identity ambient coisometry. Its transfer map is idempotent, so it is a renormalization fixed point, but its adjacent-region correlations are not independent of distance. Thus the implication from renormalization fixed points to zero correlation length fails, regardless of the commuting-parent condition. The raw-weight example of Theorem 24.2.9 separately refutes the reverse implication from zero correlation length to renormalization fixed points.
Source gap (adjacent regions). The obstruction and its scope are recorded in docs/paper-gaps/cpsv16_pure_zcl_adjacent_gap_cid_scope.tex. Theorem 24.5.10 repairs only the forward correlation statement when both complementary gaps are positive; it does not establish the printed unrestricted three-way equivalence. That equivalence is recorded here as refuted, not as a theorem awaiting proof.
Let \(A\) and \(B\) be normal tensors of positive, possibly different, bond dimensions. Then either \(O_{AB}(N)\to 0\), or there is a phase \(\zeta \in \mathbb {C}\), with \(|\zeta |=1\), such that \(|V^{(N)}(B)\rangle =\zeta ^N|V^{(N)}(A)\rangle \) for every chain length \(N\). This is [ CPGSV16 , Corollary A.3 ] .
Let \(A\) and \(B\) be normal tensors of positive, possibly different, bond dimensions. Suppose that, for some nonzero \(\zeta \in \mathbb {C}\), \(|V^{(N)}(B)\rangle =\zeta ^N|V^{(N)}(A)\rangle \) for \(N\geq 0\). Then the bond dimensions are equal and there is an invertible matrix \(X\) and a scalar \(\eta \) of unit modulus such that \(B^i=\eta X A^iX^{-1}\) for every physical letter \(i\). This is the gauge recovery used in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix A ] .
Let \(A\) and \(B\) be normal tensors of positive, possibly different, bond dimensions. Their self-overlaps satisfy
Moreover, either \(O_{AB}(N)\longrightarrow 0\), or their bond dimensions are equal; call the common value \(D\). Then there are \(X\in \mathrm{GL}_D(\mathbb {C})\) and \(\zeta \in \mathbb {C}\), with \(|\zeta |=1\), such that \(B^i=\zeta X A^iX^{-1}\) for every physical letter \(i\). In the latter case, \(|O_{AB}(N)|\to 1\). This is [ CPGSV16 , Lemma A.2 ] .
Let \((A_j)_{j=1}^g\) be a finite family of positive-bond-dimension normal tensors, no two of which are gauge-phase equivalent after identifying equal bond dimensions. Then the matrix product vectors \(\{ |V^{(N)}(A_j)\rangle \} _{j=1}^g\) are linearly independent for all sufficiently large \(N\), as in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix A ] .
Let \(A\) be a normal tensor of positive bond dimension in the sense of [ CPGSV16 , Section 2.2 ] . There is a positive definite matrix \(\sigma \) such that the gauge obtained from \(\sigma \) is trace-preserving, primitive, and irreducible. No scalar rescaling is needed.
Let \(A\) be in literal CPSV canonical form. For canonical-form data and its active BNT refinement, write
where \(B^i=GT_{\mathrm{grp}}^iG^{-1}\), \(G\) is the listed block gauge, and \(T_{\mathrm{grp}}\) retains every inactive listed coordinate with weight zero. If marked matrices satisfy \(C=V^\dagger EV\), then for every word \(w\), including the empty word,
The marked matrix makes the closed chain nonempty; no equality of unmarked empty-word matrix product vectors is asserted.
For a linear physical mark \(f\), the linear marking of \(T_{\mathrm{grp}}\) is exactly its full grouped marked tensor. Each active copy \((j,q)\) carries \(\lambda _{j,q}f(C_j)\), where \(\lambda _{j,q}=\nu _{k(j,q)}\zeta _{k(j,q)}\), while every inactive marked block is zero. For two linear marks \(f\) and \(g\), put \(F_A^u=\sum _i f_{ui}A^i\) and \(G_A^u=\sum _i g_{ui}A^i\). If
for every marked letter \(u\) and every word \(w\), then \(F_A=G_A\) on the original bond space.
- MPSTensor.trace_marked_mul_evalWord_of_coisometry_reconstruction
- MPSTensor.linearMarkedTensor_coisometry_reconstruction
- MPSTensor.trace_linearMarkedTensor_mul_evalWord_of_coisometry_reconstruction
- MPSTensor.CPSVCanonicalFormData.ActiveBNTRefinement.linearMarkedTensor_groupedTensor_eq_groupedMarkedTensor
- MPSTensor.CPSVCanonicalFormData.ActiveBNTRefinement.linearMarkedTensor_eq_of_trace_agree
- MPSTensor.IsCPSVCanonicalForm.linearMarkedTensor_eq_of_trace_agree
Let \((C_j^s)_j\) and \((E_j^s)_j\) be two marked families on the active representatives. Form their full-coordinate marked tensors by retaining the inactive listed coordinates as zero blocks. If
for every \(s\) and every word \(w\), then \(C_j=E_j\) for every active representative \(j\).
In particular, let \(Y,Z\in M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\). If their first-site actions agree on the positive-length matrix product vectors of \(T_{\mathrm{grp}}\), then
for every active representative \(j\) and every physical letter \(i\).
CPSV asserts that a tensor \(A\) in canonical form has physical BNT zero correlation length if and only if
Both directions fail as printed.
For the reverse implication, let \(C^0=(1)\) and form the direct sum of two scalar copies with weights \(1\) and \(1/2\). The resulting tensor is
The scalar tensor \(C\) is normal, and the weights obey the source convention \(|\mu _k|\leq 1\), with at least one weight of modulus one. The singleton BNT family \((C)\) is locally orthogonal and gives \(A\) physical BNT zero correlation length, whereas
Thus zero correlation length does not imply transfer idempotence under the source’s raw weight normalization.
Independently, the Bell-pair chain of Theorem 24.2.10 is a single normal block. Taking its weight to be \(1\) and the ambient coisometry to be the identity gives a literal CPSV canonical-form tensor. Its transfer map is idempotent, but its adjacent two-region expectation is \(1\), while the expectation after an allowed one-site shift is \(0\). Hence transfer idempotence does not imply physical zero correlation length for the unrestricted quantification over disjoint regions.
Source gap (adjacent regions). The printed forward argument uses \(\mathcal{E}_A^n=\mathcal{E}_A\), which follows from idempotence only for \(n\geq 1\). Adjacent regions insert \(\mathcal{E}_A^0=\mathbb {1}\) and are included in the source definition. This gap is recorded in docs/paper-gaps/cpsv16_pure_zcl_adjacent_gap_cid_scope.tex. Theorem 24.5.10 proves the repaired forward implication when both complementary gaps are positive. It does not prove the unrestricted biconditional in [ CPGSV16 , Theorem 3.8 ] . The converse and equivalence results below require their stated unit-weight, multiplicity-one, or spectral hypotheses. The printed biconditional is recorded here as refuted, not as a theorem awaiting proof.
Let \((A_j)_{j=1}^r\) be a family in which each \(A_j\) is injective and left-canonical, \(\sum _i (A_j^i)^\dagger A_j^i = \mathbb {1}\), and distinct equal-dimension blocks are not gauge-phase equivalent. Then \(O_{A_jA_k}(N) \to 0\) for every pair \(j \neq k\).
Let \(D{\gt}0\). If \(A\) is normal, then \(T_{D^2-d'+1}(A)=M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), where \(d'=\dim S_1(A)=\operatorname{kr}(A)\). This is the cumulative-span estimate used to prove the sharp trace conclusion in [ SPGWC10 , Lemma 1 ] .
Let \(A\) be \(L_0\)-block-injective with \(L_0{\gt}0\) and \(D \ge 1\). If an \(N\)-site periodic-chain state satisfies all cyclic ground-space constraints at some range \(L_0+1\le L\le N\), then it lies in the open-chain ground space \(G_N(A)\).
Let \(A\) be a left-canonical irreducible tensor. Then there is a period-removing length \(m\ge 1\) such that \(A^{[m]}\) admits:
left-canonical sector tensors \((C_k)_{k=1}^m\) of nonzero bond dimension,
a unit-weight direct-sum MPV decomposition \(A^{[m]}\sim \bigoplus _{k=1}^mC_k\),
orthogonal projections \((P_k)_{k=1}^m\) summing to \(\mathbb {1}\) with \(\mathcal{E}_{A^\dagger }(P_{k+1})=P_k\),
commutation relations \(P_k(A^{[m]})^i=(A^{[m]})^iP_k\) for every blocked letter \(i\),
the sector trace formula \(f_{C_k}(\sigma ) =\operatorname{tr}(P_k(A^{[m]})^{\sigma _1}\cdots (A^{[m]})^{\sigma _N})\),
linear isomorphisms onto the compression corners \(\varphi _k:M_{\dim C_k}(\mathbb {C})\xrightarrow {\sim }P_kM_{D}(\mathbb {C})P_k\),
transfer-intertwining identities \(\varphi _k(\mathcal{E}_{C_k^\dagger }(X)) =\mathcal{E}_{(P_kA^{[m]})^\dagger }(\varphi _k(X))\),
multiplicativity and adjoint compatibility \(\varphi _k(XY)=\varphi _k(X)\varphi _k(Y)\) and \(\varphi _k(X^\dagger )=\varphi _k(X)^\dagger \).
This is the cyclic-sector part of the period-removal step of [ CPGSV16 , Section 2.3 ] ; the projections \(P_k\) come from the peripheral spectrum of the adjoint transfer map ( [ Wol12 , Theorem 6.6 ] ).
Let \(A\) be a left-canonical irreducible tensor, and suppose the adjoint transfer map \(\mathcal{E}_{A^\dagger }\) has a positive-definite fixed point, is irreducible as a positive map, and has peripheral spectrum
where \(\gamma \) is a primitive \(m\)th root of unity and \(m\ge 1\). Then the spectral cyclic-sector decomposition of \(A^{[m]}\) has compression maps which may be chosen with rectangular support isometries \(V_k\) satisfying
These isometries also realize the blocked corner letters \(\varphi _k(C_k^\alpha )=P_k(A^{[m]})^\alpha P_k\).
The cyclic peripheral-spectrum decomposition applied to \(\mathcal{E}_{A^\dagger }\) provides projections \(P_k\) satisfying \(\mathcal{E}_{A^\dagger }(P_{k+1})=P_k\). Iterating \(m\) times gives \((\mathcal{E}_{A^\dagger })^m(P_k)=P_k\), and \((\mathcal{E}_{A^\dagger })^m=\mathcal{E}_{(A^{[m]})^\dagger }\) shows that each \(P_k\) is fixed by the adjoint transfer map of \(A^{[m]}\). Applying Theorem E.5.3 to that blocked tensor gives the compressed sector tensors and the support isometries in (??).
Let \(A\) be a left-canonical irreducible tensor. Then there is a period \(m\ge 1\) and a unit-weight decomposition of \(A^{[m]}\) into sector blocks \((C_k)_{k=1}^m\), each of which is left-canonical, has primitive transfer map, is tensor-irreducible, and has nonzero bond dimension. Equivalently, the cyclic-sector decomposition of \(A^{[m]}\) already satisfies the trace-preservation, primitivity, and irreducibility hypotheses needed for the common-blocking step (Lemma E.5.5).
There is a left-canonical, injective doubled-index tensor with a nonzero block weight satisfying the older per-copy finite-length separation hypothesis whose restriction to the diagonal physical pairs is not normal. On bond space \(\mathbb {C}^2\), take
Then the four matrices \(A^{(a,b)}\) span \(M_{2}(\mathbb {C})\) and \(\sum _{a,b}(A^{(a,b)})^*A^{(a,b)}=\mathbb {1}\). For a single block, injectivity also gives finite-length block separation. The diagonal restriction, however, consists only of
Every product of these two matrices is diagonal, so no blocking length spans \(M_{2}(\mathbb {C})\).
Let \(\{ D_i\} _{i\in I}\) and \(\{ E_j\} _{j\in J}\) be positive integers. A star-algebra isomorphism
determines an equivalence \(\sigma :I\simeq J\) such that the isomorphism carries the \(i\)-th block ideal onto the \(\sigma (i)\)-th block ideal and \(D_i=E_{\sigma (i)}\) for every \(i\in I\). For an automorphism of one product, the induced permutation may exchange equal-dimensional block ideals; it preserves the dimension along each matched pair.
Let \(\mathcal A=\bigoplus _{\alpha \in I}\mathcal M_{d_\alpha \times d_\alpha }\), let \(\iota :\mathcal A\to \operatorname{End}(\bigoplus _\alpha \mathbb C^{d_\alpha })\) be the block-diagonal embedding, and let \(\pi \) be diagonal compression. For a linear map \(F:\mathcal A\to \mathcal A\), set \(\widehat F=\iota \circ F\circ \pi \). Then:
if \(F\) is trace nonincreasing on positive elements of \(\mathcal A\), then \(\widehat F\) is trace nonincreasing;
if \(\widehat F\) is trace preserving, then \(F\) preserves the total trace on \(\mathcal A\).
Let \(\mathcal A=\bigoplus _{i\in I}M_{n_i}(\mathbb {C})\) be a finite direct sum. Suppose that \(T:\mathcal A\to \mathcal A\) is positive and preserves the total trace, that its trace adjoint satisfies the Schwarz inequality, and that \(T\) fixes a family \(\rho =(\rho _i)_i\) with every \(\rho _i\) positive definite. Then there are positive integers \(d_k,m_k\), density matrices \(\sigma _k\in M_{m_k}(\mathbb {C})\), a unitary \(U\) on \(\bigoplus _i\mathbb {C}^{n_i}\), and a reindexing of this space by \(\bigoplus _k(\mathbb {C}^{m_k}\otimes \mathbb {C}^{d_k})\) such that \(T(A)=A\) if and only if there are matrices \(X_k\in M_{d_k}(\mathbb {C})\) satisfying
Here \(\iota \) is the block-diagonal embedding. This is the finite-direct-sum fixed-point step used in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.4, lines 1980–1995 ] ; it does not assert the channel hypotheses for the particular sector maps in that argument. This is the full-support restriction: the support reduction and complementary zero summand of the general theorem remain open.
In the endomorphic case \(\mathcal B=\mathcal A\), write \(\mathcal H=\mathcal H_A=\mathcal H_B\) and \(\iota =\iota _A=\iota _B\). If \(T\) is positive and satisfies the Schwarz inequality on \(\mathcal A\), then \(\widehat T\) is positive and satisfies the Schwarz inequality on \(\operatorname{End}(\mathcal H)\). If \(T\) preserves the total trace \(\sum _k\operatorname{tr}(A_k)\), then \(\widehat T\) preserves the ordinary trace. Moreover, \((\widehat T)^*=\widehat{T^*}\). If \(T\) is positive and its direct-sum trace adjoint satisfies the Schwarz inequality, then the trace adjoint of \(\widehat T\) satisfies the Schwarz inequality on \(\operatorname{End}(\mathcal H)\). Finally,
Equivalently, for every \(X\in \operatorname{End}(\mathcal H)\),
- Matrix.IsPositiveDirectSumMap.directSumExtension_isPositiveMap
- Matrix.IsSchwarzDirectSumMap.directSumExtension_isSchwarzMap
- Matrix.IsTracePreservingDirectSumMap.directSumExtension_isTracePreservingMap
- Matrix.traceAdjointMap_directSumExtension
- Matrix.IsSchwarzDirectSumMap.traceAdjointMap_directSumExtension_isSchwarzMap
- Matrix.directSumExtension_apply_eq_self_iff
Let \(\{ D_i\} _{i\in I}\) and \(\{ E_j\} _{j\in J}\) be positive integers, and set
If \(T:\mathcal A\to \mathcal B\) and \(S:\mathcal B\to \mathcal A\) are mutually inverse completely positive trace-preserving maps, let \(\Phi :\mathcal A\simeq \mathcal B\) be the star-algebra isomorphism obtained from their trace adjoints. Write \(I_i\) and \(J_j\) for the block ideals of \(\mathcal A\) and \(\mathcal B\), respectively. Then there is an equivalence \(\sigma :I\simeq J\) such that, for every \(i\in I\),
This is the simple-summand matching conclusion used in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.4, line 1997 ] ; the unitary action within the paired summands is a separate conclusion.
Let \(T:\mathcal A\to \mathcal B\) and \(S:\mathcal B\to \mathcal A\) be mutually inverse completely positive trace-preserving maps between finite products of nonzero full matrix algebras. There are an equivalence \(\sigma :I\simeq J\), equalities \(D_i=E_{\sigma (i)}\), and unitaries \(U_i\in M_{E_{\sigma (i)}}(\mathbb {C})\) such that
with the nonzero entry in (??) in position \(\sigma (i)\) and the entries on the left and right of (??) in positions \(\sigma (i)\) and \(i\), respectively. These identities hold for every \(i\in I\), \(X\in M_{D_i}(\mathbb {C})\), and \(Y\in M_{E_{\sigma (i)}}(\mathbb {C})\).
Let \(T:\mathcal A\to \mathcal B\) and \(S:\mathcal B\to \mathcal A\) be mutually inverse completely positive trace-preserving maps between finite direct sums of full matrix algebras. Their trace adjoints are mutually inverse unital completely positive maps. Moreover, for all \(X,Y\in \mathcal B\),
and likewise for \(S^*\). Thus \(T^*\) and \(S^*\) determine mutually inverse star-algebra equivalences. This theorem does not yet identify the simple summands or their dimensions.
- IsKrausCP.kadison_schwarz_of_map_one_eq_one
- Matrix.IsSchwarzBetweenDirectSums
- Matrix.IsKrausDirectSumMap.isSchwarzBetweenDirectSums
- Matrix.IsKrausDirectSumMap.map_conjTranspose_between
- Matrix.schwarz_equality_of_mutual_inverse_kraus_direct_sum_maps
- Matrix.map_mul_of_mutual_inverse_kraus_direct_sum_maps
- Matrix.starAlgEquivOfMutualInverseKrausDirectSumMaps
- Matrix.starAlgEquivOfMutualInverseKrausDirectSumMaps_apply
- Matrix.starAlgEquivOfMutualInverseKrausDirectSumMaps_symm_apply
- Matrix.directSumTraceAdjointMapBetween_comp_eq_id_of_comp_eq_id
- Matrix.directSumTraceAdjointMapBetween_map_mul_of_mutual_inverse
- Matrix.directSumTraceAdjointStarAlgEquiv
- Matrix.directSumTraceAdjointStarAlgEquiv_apply
- Matrix.directSumTraceAdjointStarAlgEquiv_symm_apply
Retain an equivalence \(\sigma :I\simeq J\) which matches the block ideals of a star-algebra isomorphism \(\Phi :\prod _{i\in I}M_{D_i}(\mathbb {C})\simeq \prod _{j\in J}M_{E_j}(\mathbb {C})\), together with equalities \(D_i=E_{\sigma (i)}\). Then there are unitaries \(U_i\in M_{E_{\sigma (i)}}(\mathbb {C})\) such that, for every \(X\in M_{D_i}(\mathbb {C})\),
where \(\iota _i\) is the reindexing induced by the retained dimension equality. In particular, this conclusion applies to the trace-adjoint star-algebra isomorphism of any mutually inverse completely positive trace-preserving pair. This is the blockwise-unitary statement in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.4, line 1997 ] ; it does not assert the later MPDO multiplicity or coefficient relations.
Let \(\mathcal A\) and \(\mathcal B\) be finite sums of full matrix algebras, and let \(T:\mathcal A\to \mathcal B\) and \(S:\mathcal B\to \mathcal A\) be linear maps. Suppose that \(T\) is positive, both maps are trace nonincreasing, and \(S\circ T\) is trace preserving. Then \(T\) is trace preserving.
Suppose every bond dimension is positive. The transfer map of \(\bigoplus _k B_k\) is idempotent if and only if, for every pair \(j,j'\), the mixed transfer operator is idempotent:
Let \(E\) be a directed relation on a set \(V\), and suppose that every edge \(a\to b\) admits a directed return walk from \(b\) to \(a\). Let \(G\) be a group and assign a weight \(\kappa _{a,b}\in G\) to each ordered pair of vertices. If the product of the edge weights along every closed directed walk is one, then there are vertex weights \(z_a\in G\) such that \(\kappa _{a,b}=z_a^{-1}z_b\) whenever \(a\to b\) is an edge. This is the graph-theoretic coboundary step needed to make the phase choices in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1446–1450 ] coherent across a recurrent support component.
Let \(D \ge 1\) and let \(E\) be an irreducible completely positive map on \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\). Suppose \(\rho , \sigma \ge 0\) are nonzero positive semidefinite matrices satisfying \(E(\rho ) = r_1\rho \) and \(E(\sigma ) = r_2\sigma \) for real scalars \(r_1, r_2 {\gt} 0\). Then \(r_1 = r_2\).
Let \(D{\gt}0\), suppose \(\sum _i(A^i)^\dagger A^i=\mathbb {1}\), and assume that \(A\) is primitive in the sense of Definition 8.1.1.3. If \(\varphi \neq 0\), \(\mu \neq 0\), and \(A^{i_0}\varphi =\mu \varphi \), then \(H_{D-1}(A,\varphi )=\mathbb {C}^D\). This is [ SPGWC10 , Lemma 2(a) ] .
For the reference in (??),
after canonical reassociation of the three tensor factors. The raw support-map summand is the maximally mixed specialization of [ HJPW04 , equation (10) ] . The complementary summand comes from the chosen support completion in (??). This theorem does not assert a Hayashi–Koashi–Imoto decomposition.
Let \(\rho \) be a Hermitian matrix and let \(\log \rho \) be its logarithm defined through the functional calculus. Then
If \(\rho _{BC}\) is positive semidefinite and \(\rho _B=\operatorname{tr}_C\rho _{BC}\), then
If \(P_B\) is the support projector of \(\rho _B\), then the support projector of \(d_A^{-1}\mathbf1_A\otimes \rho _B\) is
For the reference in (??),
For any PSD Hermitian matrix \(\rho \) with \(\operatorname{tr}(\rho ) = 1\) on an arbitrary finite index set, \(S(\rho ) \ge 0\). This is the analog of Theorem 21.2.4 for arbitrary finite index sets: it does not require the index set to be \(\{ 0,\ldots ,D{-}1\} \), so it applies to bipartite density matrices on \(\mathbb {C}^{d_A} \otimes \mathbb {C}^{d_B}\).
Let \(A=\sum _j M_j\) be a finite sum of Hermitian matrices. Suppose there are operators \(P_j\) such that
Then \(S(A)=\sum _j S(M_j)\). The operators \(P_j\) need only resolve the support of \(A\); their sum need not be the identity on the ambient space. This is the support form of the direct-sum entropy identity used in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1760–1770 ] .
For the reference in (??), the chosen complementary preparation term factors as
after the canonical reassociation of the three tensor factors. This follows from the chosen support completion in (??), not from [ HJPW04 , equation (10) ] .
For the reference in (??), the support Petz map for \(\operatorname{tr}_C\) factors as
after the canonical identification \((H_A\otimes H_B)\otimes H_C\cong H_A\otimes (H_B\otimes H_C)\). This is the maximally mixed specialization of [ HJPW04 , equation (10) ] . It is the tensor-product identity for the raw Petz support formula, not the Hayashi–Koashi–Imoto block decomposition.
For the reference in (??), the raw Petz map for \(\operatorname{tr}_C\) satisfies
Equivalently, for every product operator \(A_0\otimes X_B\),
The formulas use the canonical identification \((H_A\otimes H_B)\otimes H_C\cong H_A\otimes (H_B\otimes H_C)\).
This is the globally valid ambient-space form of [ HJPW04 , equation (10) ] . The literal identity-tensored formula in that equation is obtained on the support of \(\rho _A\), or after choosing an extension away from that support. For singular \(\rho _A\), the raw map on the full matrix algebra contains the compression \(X\mapsto P_AXP_A\).
Let \(X\) be an operator on \(H_A\otimes H_B\). If
then
If \(\rho _A\) is positive definite, then \(P_A=\mathbf1_A\), and this identity holds for every \(X\).
When \(\rho _A\) is singular, no global identity-tensored formula is asserted for the raw map outside the displayed support. Nor is the generic trace-preserving completion in Definition 21.2.61 asserted to factor: its complementary projection is \(\mathbf1_{AB}-P_A\otimes P_B\), which need not be the identity on \(A\) tensored with a projection on \(B\).
Set \(\rho _B=\operatorname{tr}_C\rho _{BC}\), and let \(P_A\) and \(P_B\) be the support projections of \(\rho _A\) and \(\rho _B\). Then
Each identity is understood after the same canonical reassociation of the three tensor factors.
For any tripartite density matrix \(\rho _{ABC}\), equality in strong subadditivity holds if and only if \(\rho _{ABC}\) admits a quantum Markov decomposition on the middle subsystem \(B\).
This formulation introduces no new axiom: it is the same equality criterion as Theorem 21.4.40.
For any tripartite density matrix \(\rho _{ABC}\) on \(A \otimes B \otimes C\),
This formulation introduces no new axiom: it is the same strong-subadditivity statement as Theorem 21.4.4, which is proved there from Lieb concavity along the relative-entropy route [ LR73 ] .
Let \(\rho \) be a Hermitian matrix indexed by a finite set \(J\), and let \(e : I \to J\) be a bijection from a finite set \(I\). The reindexed matrix on \(I\) with entries \(\rho _{e(i)\, e(j)}\) has the same von Neumann entropy as \(\rho \).
Let \(\omega _j\) be density matrices and let \(p_j\geq 0\). Then
In particular, when the \(p_j\) form a probability distribution, this is
This is the entropy identity used in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1760–1770 ] .
Let \(M_\alpha \) be a normal tensor, and let \(X\) and \(Y\) be invertible gauges whose Gram matrices induce the same conjugation on each letter \(M_\alpha ^v\). Then there is a positive real number \(\omega \) such that
and \(\omega ^{-1/2}XY^{-1}\) is unitary. Theorem 23.4.66 gives the Figure 8 comparison in [ CPGSV16 , Proposition 4.13, lines 1909–1921 ] . This comparison supplies precisely the relative hypothesis for a sector and the distinguished sector. In the normalization \(Y=\mathbb {1}\), the resulting unitary is \(\omega ^{-1/2}X\). The common-target declarations attached to this entry are conditional algebraic corollaries, not the reflected marked-chain statement itself.
- MPSTensor.IsNormal.gram_eq_pos_smul_gram_of_gram_conj_eq
- MPSTensor.IsNormal.gram_eq_pos_smul_one_of_gram_conj_eq
- MPSTensor.IsNormal.exists_unitary_normalization_of_gram_conj_eq
- MPSTensor.IsNormal.gram_eq_pos_smul_gram_of_common_dressed_target
- MPSTensor.IsNormal.smul_mul_nonsing_inv_mem_unitaryGroup_of_common_dressed_target
- Matrix.smul_mul_nonsing_inv_mem_unitaryGroup_of_gram_eq_smul
Let \(A\) and \(B\) be tensors, possibly with different bond dimensions, whose self-overlaps tend to one. Suppose that, for all sufficiently large \(N\), there is \(c_N\in \mathbb {C}\) such that \(|V^{(N)}(A)\rangle =c_N|V^{(N)}(B)\rangle \). Then \(|O_{AB}(N)|\to 1\).
Assume \(D{\gt}0\). Every bipartite matrix \(W\) on \(\mathbb {C}^D\otimes \mathbb {C}^D\) is the Choi matrix \(\tau _T=(T\otimes \mathbb {1})(|\Omega \rangle \langle \Omega |)\) of some linear map \(T\colon M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\).
Given a finite family \((B_k)_{k=1}^r\), each with primitive irreducible cyclic sectors, there is a common blocking length \(p\) such that each \(B_k^{[p]}\) admits a unit-weight direct-sum decomposition over a single common blocked alphabet \(d^{[p]}\) into left-canonical blocks with primitive transfer maps, tensor irreducibility, and positive bond dimensions.
Let \(\rho \) be a trace-one Hermitian bipartite state whose Schmidt number exceeds \(n\). Then there is a Hermitian operator \(W\) such that, for every \(\psi \) of Schmidt rank at most \(n\),
This is the only-if direction of Wolf’s Proposition 3.3 [ Wol12 , Chapter 3, Proposition 3.3 ] : a state of Schmidt number larger than \(n\) is detected by an entanglement witness for \(S_n\).
If \(t_0{\gt}0\), \(T_{t_0}\) is irreducible, and \(\sigma \) is fixed for all times, then there exists a positive time step \(u\) such that \(T_{t_0}=(T_u)^{(\dim M_{D}(\mathbb {C}))!}\), the slice \(T_u\) is a channel, \(T_u\) is irreducible, and \(T_u(\sigma )=\sigma \).
Every real-linear functional \(g\) on the space of square complex matrices is the trace form of a Hermitian matrix: there is a Hermitian \(H_0\) with \(g(X)=\operatorname{Re}\operatorname{tr}(X H_0)\) for every Hermitian \(X\).
Assume \(D{\gt}0\). Let \(W\) be a Hermitian operator on \(\mathbb {C}^D\otimes \mathbb {C}^D\) with \(\operatorname{Re}\langle \psi |W|\psi \rangle \ge 0\) for every \(\psi \) of Schmidt rank at most \(n\). Then \(W\) is the Choi matrix of an \(n\)-positive map \(T\). This is the Choi–Jamiołkowski translation of the entanglement witness of Wolf’s Proposition 3.3 into the \(n\)-positive map of Wolf’s Proposition 3.4 [ Wol12 , Chapter 3, Proposition 3.4 ] .
Let \(\rho \) be a trace-one Hermitian bipartite state on \(\mathbb {C}^D\otimes \mathbb {C}^D\) whose Schmidt number exceeds \(n\). Then there is an \(n\)-positive map \(T\colon M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) such that \((T\otimes \mathbb {1})(\rho )\) is not positive semidefinite. This is the if direction of Wolf’s Proposition 3.4 [ Wol12 , Chapter 3, Proposition 3.4 ] .
If two pure-state ensembles \(\{ \psi _i\} _{i \in \iota _1}\) and \(\{ \phi _j\} _{j \in \iota _2}\) induce the same pure-ensemble density operator and \(|\iota _2| \le |\iota _1|\), then there exists a tall isometric mixing matrix \(V \in \mathbb {C}^{\iota _1 \times \iota _2}\) with \(V^\dagger V = \mathbb {1}\) and \(\psi _i = \sum _j V_{ij} \phi _j\). The cardinality hypothesis is what makes \(V\) a tall isometry; the symmetric case \(|\iota _1| \le |\iota _2|\) follows by swapping the roles of the ensembles.
For every POVM \(\{ E_i\} \) on \(\mathbb {C}^D\) there exist a dilation dimension \(r\), an isometry \(V:\mathbb {C}^D\to \mathbb {C}^D\otimes \mathbb {C}^r\), and a projective measurement \(\{ P_i\} \) on the dilation satisfying \(E_i=V^\dagger P_iV\).
Suppose \(A\) generates the same MPV family as \(\bigoplus _k\mu _kA_k\), and that each \(A_k\) is irreducible, satisfies \(\sum _i(A_k^i)^\dagger A_k^i=\mathbb {1}\), and has primitive transfer map, all \(\mu _k\neq 0\), and all bond dimensions are positive. Then there exist a blocking length \(p{\gt}0\), weights \((\nu _k)\), and blocked tensors \((B_k)\) such that \(A^{[p]}\) generates the same MPV family as \(\bigoplus _k\nu _kB_k\), and \((\nu _k,B_k)\) satisfies the normal canonical form conditions. The weight moduli need not be distinct; equal-modulus blocks are allowed.
Let \(T : M_{D}(\mathbb {C}) \to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be a completely positive map whose Choi matrix is positive-definite (equivalently, \(T\) has full Kraus rank). Then there exist SL-filterings \(\Phi _{1},\Phi _{2}\) such that \(\Phi _{2}\circ T\circ \Phi _{1}\) is doubly-stochastic.
This is the equal-dimension (square) case \(T : M_{D}(\mathbb {C}) \to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\); the source [ Wol12 , Proposition 2.9 ] states the proposition for a general \(T : \mathcal{M}_{d_1} \to \mathcal{M}_{d_2}\) with separate filterings on each factor.
Let \(E\) be an irreducible completely positive map on \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), let \(A \ge 0\) be nonzero, and let \(t {\gt} 0\). Then
This is the completely positive specialization of the forward implication in [ Wol12 , Theorem 6.2(3) ] .
Let \(E\) be an irreducible completely positive map on \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), let \(A \ge 0\) be nonzero, and let \(t {\gt} 0\). Then the finite exponential truncation satisfies
This is the finite-sum core of the completely positive specialization of [ Wol12 , Theorem 6.2(3) ] .
Fix an injective, trace-preserving MPS tensor \(A\) with positive definite fixed point \(\rho \). Let
be the corresponding fixed-point projection. Then there exist \(C {\gt} 0\) and \(0 {\lt} \delta \le 1\) such that, for all \(n\ge 0\) and \(X\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\),
The transfer-map gap \(\delta \) exists by primitivity (Theorem 4.11.3, the complementary transfer-map gap).
For all \(t,s \in \mathbb {R}\), \(e^{(t+s)L} = e^{tL} \cdot e^{sL}\).
The map \(t \mapsto e^{tL}\) is continuous in the operator norm topology.
Assume \(D{\gt}0\). Let \(T:M_{D,D}(\mathbb {C})(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D,D}(\mathbb {C})(\mathbb {C})\) be \(k\)-positive, with Choi matrix \(\tau \). If a right-factor matrix has the form \(P=VV^\dagger \) with \(V\in M_{D,k}(\mathbb {C})(\mathbb {C})\), then \(R_P\tau R_P^\dagger \geq 0\).
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D'}(\mathbb {C})\) be a positive map between matrix algebras of possibly different dimensions, and let \(X\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) satisfy \(X^\dagger T^*(\mathbb {1})X=\mathbb {1}\), where \(T^*\) is the trace-pairing adjoint. Then \(\rho \mapsto T(X\rho X^\dagger )\) is positive and trace-preserving.
This is the algebraic trace-normalization step in the proof of [ Wol12 , Chapter 3, Lemma “Making positive maps trace preserving” ] . The inverse-square-root choice is recorded in the next theorem.
Let \(N\geq 1\), and let \(A_0,\ldots ,A_{N-1}\) be nonzero complex square matrices, with possibly different dimensions. If their finite Kronecker product is positive semidefinite, then there are nonzero scalars \(c_0,\ldots ,c_{N-1}\) such that
Let \(E\) be a unital Kraus map on \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) whose adjoint map \(E^*\) has a positive definite fixed point \(\rho {\gt}0\). There are \(n\in \mathbb {N}\), positive dimensions \(d_k\) and multiplicities \(m_k\) with \(\sum _kd_km_k=D\), and a unitary \(U\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) such that a matrix \(X\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) satisfies \(E(X)=X\) exactly when
for some matrices \(B_k\in M_{d_k}(\mathbb {C})\). This is Theorem 25.6.19 with the roles of the map and its adjoint exchanged.
Let \(E:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be positive and unital, and suppose that, for every \(A\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), it satisfies the Schwarz inequality
If the trace-pairing adjoint \(E^*\) has a positive definite fixed point \(\rho {\gt}0\), then \(\operatorname{Fix}(E)\) is a \(*\)-subalgebra of \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\).
In the terminology introduced immediately before [ Wol12 , Example 5.3 ] , a Schwarz map is precisely a positive unital map satisfying (??). Thus the three assumptions reproduce the source’s Schwarz-map convention. In [ Wol12 , Theorem 6.12 ] , the trace adjoint is initially assumed to have an arbitrary full-rank fixed point. The proposition on positive fixed points then produces a positive definite fixed point \(\rho \), to which the theorem above applies. The resulting explicit block form of the algebra is given in [ Wol12 , Equation (1.39) ] .
Let \(E\) be a unital Kraus map on \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) whose adjoint map \(E^*\) has a positive definite fixed point \(\rho {\gt}0\). There exist \(n\in \mathbb {N}\) and dimensions \(d_1,\ldots ,d_n\geq 1\) such that the fixed-point \(*\)-subalgebra is \(\mathbb {C}\)-algebra isomorphic to \(\operatorname{Fix}(E)\cong \prod _{k=1}^{n}M_{d_k}(\mathbb {C})\).
Let \(A\) be an irreducible MPS tensor with \(\sum _i(A^i)^\dagger A^i=\mathbb {1}\) and \(D{\gt}0\). Then there exist a unitary \(U\) and a diagonal positive definite \(\Lambda \) such that, for \(B^i:=U^\dagger A^iU\),
This proves the diagonal Perron normalization required in CFII. It does not prove that \(A\) is in the CPSV canonical form or that its block is normal; those require the corresponding primitivity and canonical-form hypotheses.
If two tensors generate the same MPV family at every positive length, then the cyclic-sector decompositions on the two sides can be expressed at one common positive blocking length \(p\). For every \(N\ge 1\) and every blocked \(\sigma \), each blocked tensor equals its powered nonzero part:
The two powered nonzero parts agree:
If \(A\) and \(B\) generate the same MPV family at every positive length, then after removing the all-zero blocks and applying the trace-preserving gauge there are weighted nonzero-block tensors \(\bigoplus _j\mu _j^AA_j\) and \(\bigoplus _k\mu _k^BB_k\) such that, for every \(N\ge 1\) and \(\sigma \),
The two nonzero parts agree:
Each nonzero block has primitive irreducible cyclic sectors: for each \(j\), there is \(m_j\ge 1\) with a unit-weight sector decomposition \(A_j^{[m_j]}\sim \bigoplus _{u=1}^{m_j}C^A_{j,u}\), and similarly for \(B_k\).
Let \(P\) and \(Q\) be BNT canonical forms, possibly with different sector counts and different bond dimensions before matching. If their total tensors generate the same MPV family at every positive length, then there is a bijection \(\beta :J(Q)\simeq J(P)\) such that each matched basis pair has equal bond dimension and is gauge-phase equivalent. The matched copy multiplicities agree, and there are unit phases \(\zeta _k\) and copy bijections \(\tau _k\) satisfying
Only the global weight normalization in Definition 10.6.1.11 is assumed; no unit-modulus copy is required in each sector. This is the sector-data form of [ CPGSV16 , Corollary 2.11 and Appendix A, lines 1182–1188 ] .
Let \(A\) be an injective MPS tensor and \(B\) a tensor of the same bond dimension. If \(A\) and \(B\) generate the same matrix-product vectors, then there is \(X \in \mathrm{GL}_D(\mathbb {C})\) with \(B^i = X A^i X^{-1}\) for all \(i\). In tensor-network notation the gauge conjugates the local tensor on its virtual legs, with the physical index \(i\) on the upper leg:
Let \((H,\{ L_j\} )\) be a Lindblad form. If the algebra generated by \(\{ L_j\} \) and \(\kappa \) is the entire matrix algebra \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), then the Lindblad data do not admit a block-upper-triangular decomposition.
Let \(A\) be an injective tensor and assume that \(A\) and \(B\) generate the same MPV family. If \(X,Y \in \mathrm{GL}_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) both satisfy \(B^i=X\, A^i\, X^{-1}=Y\, A^i\, Y^{-1}\) for all \(i\), then there is a nonzero scalar \(u \in \mathbb {C}^{\times }\) such that \(Y=u\cdot X\).
Let \(A\) be a normalized tensor of bond dimension \(D_1\) and \(B\) a normalized tensor of bond dimension \(D_2\). Suppose \(\rho _A,\rho _B\) are fixed points of the respective transfer maps and \(S_A,S_B\) are invertible matrices with \(S_AS_A^\dagger =\rho _A\) and \(S_BS_B^\dagger =\rho _B\) (for instance the positive definite Perron–Frobenius fixed points of Theorem 6.4.2 and their square roots, as in the right-canonical gauge of Theorem 6.5.1). Gauge to unital families \(A'^i=S_A^{-1}A^iS_A\) and \(B'^i=S_B^{-1}B^iS_B\). If \(X\in M_{D_1\times D_2}(\mathbb {C})\setminus \{ 0\} \) satisfies \(F_{AB}^{\mathrm{rect}}(X)=\mu X\) with \(|\mu |=1\), then \(X'=S_A^{-1}X(S_B^\dagger )^{-1}\) is nonzero, the families \(A'\) and \(B'\) are unital, and, for every \(i\),
Let \(A\) and \(B\) be tensors of the same bond dimension. Suppose invertible gauges take them to \(A'\) and \(B'\), and suppose there are an invertible matrix \(X'\) and a scalar \(\mu \) with \(|\mu |=1\) such that \(A'^iX'=\mu X'B'^i\) for every physical index \(i\). Then \(A\) and \(B\) are gauge-phase equivalent.
Let \(A\) be an injective MPS tensor with on-site symmetry under a group representation \(U : G \to \mathrm{GL}_d(\mathbb {C})\). For each \(g \in G\), let \(X(g) \in \mathrm{GL}_D(\mathbb {C})\) satisfy \(\widetilde{A}_g^i = X(g)\, A^i\, X(g)^{-1}\) for all \(i\). Then for all \(g, h \in G\), there exists \(c(g,h) \in \mathbb {C}\) such that \(X(h)\, X(g) = c(g,h)\, X(g \cdot h)\). In fact \(c(g,h) \ne 0\) since both sides are invertible, so \(c(g,h) \in \mathbb {C}^{\times }\). Diagrammatically, the two candidate gauges are competing local replacements for the same twisted tensor:
and both sides conjugate \(A^i\) to the same twisted tensor \(\widetilde{A}_{gh}^i\).
If \(L\) is a GKSL generator, then there exist a CP map \(\phi \) and a matrix \(\kappa \) such that
If two Lindblad forms \(F,F'\) induce the same generator and both have traceless Kraus operators, then their drift matrices differ by an imaginary scalar: \(\kappa ' = \kappa +i\lambda \, \mathbb {1}\) for some \(\lambda \in \mathbb {R}\). This is part of [ Wol12 , Proposition 7.4(2) ] .
For \(N\ge 2\), the common nearest-neighbour cyclic ground space of the GHZ tensor satisfies
This is the cyclic-window form of the two-fold degeneracy in [ CPGSV21 , line 2205 ] .
The matrix \(\sigma _z\) commutes with every GHZ matrix \(A^i\). A non-scalar matrix commuting with all \(A^i\) is the hallmark of a non-injective (\(\mathbb {Z}_2\)-injective) tensor: the on-site symmetry of Theorem 17.1.7 swaps the two one-dimensional injective blocks \(A^0 \leftrightarrow A^1\), while \(\sigma _z\) acts on each block by a phase.
Let \(\mathbb {Z}_2 = \{ 1, \sigma _x\} \) act on \(\mathbb {C}^2\) by the Pauli-\(X\) matrix \(\sigma _x\). The GHZ tensor is on-site symmetric under this action: for each \(g \in \mathbb {Z}_2\), the twisted tensor \(\widetilde A_g\) defines the same MPV family as \(A\), i.e. \(\mathcal{V}(A)=\mathcal{V}(\widetilde A_g)\).
The GHZ tensor has zero correlation length: its idempotent transfer map (Theorem 17.1.5) gives correlations independent of the separation. This contrasts with the AKLT state (Theorem 17.2.1.3), whose subleading eigenvalue \(-\tfrac 13\) produces a finite correlation length \(1/\log 3\).
\(L\) is a GKSL generator if and only if
with \(H=H^\dagger \). This is [ Wol12 , Theorem 7.1 ] .
If \(L(\rho )=\phi (\rho )-\kappa \rho -\rho \kappa ^\dagger \) with \(\phi \) CP and \(\phi ^*(\mathbb {1})=\kappa +\kappa ^\dagger \), then \(L\) is a GKSL generator. This is [ Wol12 , Theorem 7.1, Equation (7.20) ] .
Let \(X\) be invertible and suppose that \(B\) and a target \(C\) satisfy
Then conjugation by the Gram matrix carries \(B\) to \(C\),
Hence any two gauges satisfying this conditional identity with the same target have equal Gram conjugations, and the ratio of their Gram matrices commutes with \(B\). This gives the relative identity from an abstract common target in [ CPGSV16 , Proposition 4.13, lines 1909–1919 ] . The reflected marked-chain argument in the source does not identify the target separately for either sector. The same-letter choice \(C=B^\dagger \) and the further specialization \(B^\dagger =B\) are useful corollaries, but the latter is not assumed by the source.
Assume \(A\) is \(L_0\)-block-injective with \(L_0 {\gt} 0\). If an element \(\psi \) on \(K+L_0+1\) sites satisfies the left ground condition on the first \(K+L_0\) sites and the suffix ground condition on every prefix of length \(K\), then \(\psi \in G_{K+L_0+1}(A)\).
Let \(A\) be injective after blocking \(L_0{\gt}0\) sites. Suppose there are matrices \(Y_\mu \) such that
for every pair of physical letters \(a,b\). Then \(\Gamma _N(X)\in \operatorname{span}\{ V^{(N)}(A)\} \).
Let \(A\) be injective after blocking \(L_0{\gt}0\) sites, and fix a physical letter \(\eta \) used outside the complementary sites. Suppose that, for every boundary condition \(\tau \) and every physical letter \(j\),
where \(C^+_\tau \) and \(C^-_\tau \) are the complementary words exposed by the two boundary-crossing cyclic windows. Suppose also that the two boundary matrices satisfy \(Y^+_{\tau ^+_\eta (\mu )} = Y^-_{\tau ^-_\eta (\mu )}\), for every word \(\mu \) on the complementary sites. Then \(\Gamma _N(X)\in \operatorname{span}\{ V^{(N)}(A)\} \).
Let \(E\) be an irreducible completely positive map on \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) and let \(A\geq 0\) be nonzero. Then
This is the completely positive specialization of the implication (1)\(\Rightarrow \)(2) in [ Wol12 , Theorem 6.2 ] .
Under the hypotheses of Theorem 15.4.5, the corresponding periodic-boundary ground space is exactly the span of the BNT component vectors:
Let \(P\) be the auxiliary BNT sector decomposition with one scalar basis tensor \(C^0=(1)\), two one-dimensional copies, and weights \(1\) and \(1/2\). Let \(A=\mathcal A(P)\), so
Then \(P\) satisfies the auxiliary BNT sector hypotheses, \(A=\mathcal A(P)\), and \(A\) and \(\mathcal A(P)\) generate the same matrix-product vectors. Moreover, the singleton family \((C)\) is a physical BNT zero-correlation-length family for \(A\), while
Its length-\(N\) matrix-product-vector coefficient is \(V^{(N)}(A)=1+2^{-N}\).
- MPSTensor.halvedWeightTensor_counterexample_to_unrestricted_zcl_iff_rfp
- MPSTensor.halvedWeightTensor_isPhysicalBNTZCL
- MPSTensor.halvedWeightTensor_eq_halvedDecomp_toTensor
- MPSTensor.halvedWeightTensor_mpv
- MPSTensor.halvedWeightTensor_sameMPV₂_halvedDecomp
- MPSTensor.halvedWeightTensor_not_isTransferIdempotent
If \(P_K=P_{AX}\circ P_{XB}\) is idempotent-product data, then
where \(Q_{AX}=\mathbb {1}-P_{AX}\) and \(Q_{XB}=\mathbb {1}-P_{XB}\) are the complementary projectors. This is the algebraic identity obtained from the complementary projectors in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix D, Section D.2 ] ; it is not the full source parent commuting Hamiltonian condition.
A matrix of Schmidt number at most \(n\) is positive semidefinite. States of Schmidt number at most \(n\) are closed under addition and under multiplication by a non-negative real scalar, and a bound on the Schmidt number relaxes to any larger bound.
A bipartite state on the square system \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\otimes M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) of Schmidt number at most \(n\) satisfies \((T\otimes \operatorname{id})(\rho )\ge 0\) for every \(n\)-positive map \(T\). This is the square case \(d=d'=D\) of the only-if direction of Wolf’s Proposition 3.4 for a general bipartite system \(M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\otimes M_{d'}(\mathbb {C})\) [ Wol12 , Chapter 3, Proposition 3.4 ] .
On a general bipartite system \(M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\otimes M_{d'}(\mathbb {C})\), with no relation imposed between the two factors, a state of Schmidt number at most \(n\) satisfies \((T\otimes \operatorname{id})(\rho )\ge 0\) for every \(n\)-positive map \(T\) on \(M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\). This is the only-if direction of Wolf’s Proposition 3.4, the first step of eq. (3.18) [ Wol12 , Chapter 3, Proposition 3.4 ] , with no restriction on the bipartite dimensions.
If \(A\) and \(B\) are injective, both on-site symmetric under a unitary representation \(U\), and if \(\mathcal{E}_A(\mathbb {1})=\mathbb {1}\), \(\mathcal{E}_B(\mathbb {1})=\mathbb {1}\), \(\Lambda _A\) and \(\Lambda _B\) are positive definite, \(\operatorname{tr}(\Lambda _A)=1\), \(\operatorname{tr}(\Lambda _B)=1\), \(\mathcal{E}_A^\dagger (\Lambda _A)=\Lambda _A\), and \(\mathcal{E}_B^\dagger (\Lambda _B)=\Lambda _B\), then for every \(g \in G\), virtual-boundary nondecay holds for \(A\) with twist \(U(g)\) if and only if it holds for \(B\). In particular, since Definition 12.4.1 implies on-site symmetry for both tensors, this theorem applies to tensors in the same SPT phase; it applies equally to symmetric tensors in different SPT phases.
Let \(A\) be an injective tensor, symmetric under a unitary representation \(U\). Assume \(\mathcal{E}_A(\mathbb {1})=\mathbb {1}\), \(\Lambda \) is positive definite, \(\operatorname{tr}(\Lambda )=1\), and \(\mathcal{E}_A^\dagger (\Lambda )=\Lambda \). Then the virtual-boundary nondecay predicate holds for every group element \(g\).
For a tripartite density matrix \(\rho _{ABC}\),
holds if and only if \(\rho _{ABC}\) admits a quantum Markov decomposition on the middle subsystem \(B\).
The reverse implication, that a quantum Markov decomposition forces the equality, is proved as Theorem 21.4.41. For the forward implication, the raw product-reference Petz map and its support behavior are given by Theorems 21.2.49 and 21.2.50. The singular-support equality-to-recovery theorem remains separate. After that analytic step, one still needs the family-level Koashi–Imoto decomposition of the recovered states, including the action of the middle-system channel on the common direct-sum factors. This forward implication remains axiomatic. The biconditional combines the two directions.
This equality criterion is cited here as an input for the later MPDO arguments. It is the equality criterion needed by Appendix C of arXiv:1606.00608. The equality conditions are reviewed in [ Hay06 ; Rus02 ] ; the structural block-decomposition formulation used for MPDOs appears in [ HJPW04 ] .
Let \(E\) be a positive trace-preserving linear map and let \(X=E(X)\) be a Hermitian fixed point. Let \(P_+=X^+\) and \(P_-=X^-\) be its canonical positive and negative parts. Thus \(X=P_+-P_-\), \(P_\pm \geq 0\), and \(P_+P_-=P_-P_+=0\). Then \(E(P_+)=P_+\) and \(E(P_-)=P_-\). This is [ Wol12 , Proposition 6.8 ] .
Let \(E\) be a nonzero completely positive map on \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\). Then \(E\) is irreducible if and only if it has the restricted CP spectral properties of Definition 6.11.1. This is a CP-map variant of [ Wol12 , Theorem 6.4 ] : uniqueness is required only among positive semidefinite Perron eigenvectors, not on the full eigenspace. Those restricted properties are nevertheless sufficient for the irreducibility equivalence.
If \(E\) is an irreducible map and \(c \neq 0\), then \(cE\) is also irreducible. For positive real \(c\), this is the scalar completely positive case of [ Wol12 , Proposition 6.6 ] ; the abstract irreducibility statement above also allows any nonzero complex \(c\).
Let \(B\) be an irreducible tensor, let \(X\) be invertible, and let \(c\ne 0\). Then the rescaled conjugated tensor with letters \(cX^{-1}B^vX\) is irreducible. In particular, the rescaled unital gauge of an irreducible tensor is irreducible; this is the normalization of [ CPGSV16 , Section 2.3 ] applied to an irreducible corner.
If \(A\) is irreducible and unital, \(\mathcal{E}_A(\mathbb {1})=\mathbb {1}\), and \(\mathcal{E}_A(X)=X\), then \(X\) is a scalar multiple of \(\mathbb {1}\). This is the final fixed-point assertion in the proof of [ PGVWC07 , Theorem 4 ] .
Let \((A_j)_j\) be nonzero-dimensional, irreducible, left-canonical, pairwise gauge-phase-distinct BNT components. If the direct-sum tensor \(A=\bigoplus _j A_j\) satisfies \(\mathcal{E}_A^2=\mathcal{E}_A\), then \(A\) has positive-gap physical CID and \(\mathcal{E}_{j,j'}=0\) for all \(j\ne j'\). Thus this explicit direct-sum representative has positive-gap BNT zero correlation length. This does not include the adjacent-region cases in [ CPGSV16 , Theorem 3.8 ] .
Let \(U\) be any matrix on the first factor. If \(\rho \) has the PPT property then
is positive semidefinite; no invertibility or unitarity of \(U\) is required. Specializing to a unitary \(U\) this is the partial transpose taken in the basis changed by \(U\), so the positivity of the partial transpose is independent of the local basis, recovering Wolf’s basis-independence statement [ Wol12 , Equation (3.17) ] .
A tensor in the square-root fixed-point form is a renormalization fixed point. This is the backward direction of the structural characterization of pure-state renormalization fixed points in [ CPGSV16 , Section 3 ] , which the source states as immediate.
Let \((B_k)_k\) be a family of tensors, each in the square-root fixed-point form, whose cross-block mixed transfer operators vanish, \(\mathcal{E}_{j,j'}=0\) for \(j\ne j'\). Then the direct sum \(\bigoplus _k B_k\) is a renormalization fixed point. This is the backward direction of the structural characterization of pure-state renormalization fixed points [ CPGSV16 , Section 3 ] , in the distinct-blocks case where each normal tensor appears once; the cross-block vanishing is the \(j\ne j'\) part of the isometry condition of that characterization, so it is part of the source joint isometry condition.
For \(d\ge 1\) and a separable matrix \(\rho \) on \(M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\otimes M_{d'}(\mathbb {C})\), applying the reduction map \(T_1(X)=\operatorname{tr}(X)\mathbb {1}-X\) to the first factor keeps the result positive semidefinite: \((T_1\otimes \operatorname{id})(\rho )\ge 0\). This is the separability instance of the operator inequality underlying the reduction criterion at the first level.
Let \(W:\mathbb {C}^n\to \mathbb {C}^D\) satisfy \(W^\dagger W=\mathbb {1}_n\). There are an identification \(\mathbb {C}^D\simeq \mathbb {C}^{D-n}\oplus \mathbb {C}^n\) and a unitary \(U\) on \(\mathbb {C}^D\) such that, for every \(A\in M_{n}(\mathbb {C})\),
A normal left-canonical renormalization fixed-point tensor has the square-root fixed-point form. With \(\lambda _\alpha =\rho _{\alpha ,\alpha }/\operatorname{tr}\rho \) and \(\rho _0=\operatorname{diag}(\lambda _\alpha )\), it admits \(A^i=X\sqrt{\rho _0}\, U^iX^{-1}\), where \(\rho _0\) is positive and trace-normalized and \(U\) is a unit pair-index isometry. Trace normalization is the identity \(\sum _\alpha \rho _{\alpha ,\alpha }=\operatorname{tr}\rho \). This is the normal-tensor statement corresponding to lines 1278 and 1281–1283, with the square-root correction dictated by the reference tensor at line 1300 [ CPGSV16 , Appendix B ] .
Each block of a multi-block tensor whose blocks are normal, left-canonical renormalization fixed points has the square-root fixed-point form, with a trace-normalized diagonal weight and a unit pair-index isometry. This is the single-block trace-normalized form applied to each block; it omits the cross-block orthogonality between distinct normal-tensor blocks.
Assume \(D{\gt}0\). A linear map \(T:M_{D,D}(\mathbb {C})(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D,D}(\mathbb {C})(\mathbb {C})\) is \(k\)-positive if and only if, for every \(X\in M_{D,k}(\mathbb {C})(\mathbb {C})\), the right-factor compression of the Choi matrix of \(T\) by \(X\) is positive semidefinite.
A linear map \(E:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) is \(k\)-positive if and only if, for every vector \(\phi \in \mathbb {C}^D\otimes \mathbb {C}^k\), \(E^{(k)}(|\phi \rangle \! \langle \phi |)\ge 0\). This is the pure-state reduction used in [ Wol12 , Chapter 3, Proposition 3.1 ] .
Assume \(D{\gt}0\). If \(T:M_{D,D}(\mathbb {C})(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D,D}(\mathbb {C})(\mathbb {C})\) is \(k\)-positive, then, for every \(X\in M_{D,k}(\mathbb {C})(\mathbb {C})\),
where \(\tau \) is the Choi matrix of \(T\).
Let \(E(X) = \sum _i K_i X K_i^\dagger \) be a unital Kraus map, so that \(\sum _i K_i K_i^\dagger = \mathbb {1}\). Then, for every \(X \in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\),
This is [ Wol12 , Equation (5.2) ] .
Let \((H,\{ L_j\} )\) be a Lindblad form with \(\kappa =iH+\tfrac {1}{2}\sum _jL_j^\dagger L_j\), and let \(P\) be an orthogonal projection such that the generator preserves the compression \(PM_{D}(\mathbb {C})P\). If \((\mathbb {1}-P)L_jP=0\) for every \(j\), then \((\mathbb {1}-P)\kappa P=0\).
Let \(\rho ,\sigma \in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be density matrices with \(\sigma \) of full rank. Then the relative entropy vanishes exactly when the states coincide, \(D(\rho \Vert \sigma )=0\iff \rho =\sigma \). Together with nonnegativity, this is the order property that makes \(D\) a divergence.
Let \(\rho ,\sigma \in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be density matrices satisfying the support condition \(\ker \sigma \subseteq \ker \rho \), that is, every vector annihilated by \(\sigma \) is annihilated by \(\rho \). Then the relative entropy is non-negative, \(D(\rho \Vert \sigma )\ge 0\).
Let \(\{ B_\alpha \} _{\alpha \in \iota _1}\) and \(\{ A_j\} _{j \in \iota _2}\) be finite Kraus families with \(|\iota _2| \le |\iota _1|\). Then the following are equivalent:
\(\sum _\alpha B_\alpha X B_\alpha ^\dagger = \sum _j A_j X A_j^\dagger \) for all \(X \in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\).
There exists a matrix \(V = (V_{\alpha j})\) with \(V^\dagger V = \mathbb {1}\) such that \(B_\alpha = \sum _j V_{\alpha j} A_j\) for every \(\alpha \).
The transfer map of \(A\) is idempotent if and only if there exists an isometry \(V\colon \mathbb {C}^d\to \mathbb {C}^{d^2}\), written as coefficients \(V_{(i_1,i_2),j}\) with \(V^\dagger V=\mathbb {1}\), such that
for all \(i_1,i_2\in \{ 0,\ldots ,d-1\} \).
If \(\sum _\alpha B_\alpha X B_\alpha ^\dagger = \sum _j A_j X A_j^\dagger \) for all \(X\) and \(r_2 \le r_1\) (where \(\{ B_\alpha \} _{\alpha =0}^{r_1-1}\) is the larger family and \(\{ A_j\} _{j=0}^{r_2-1}\) the smaller), then there exists a rectangular isometry \(V\) (\(r_1 \times r_2\), \(V^\dagger V = \mathbb {1}_{r_2}\)) such that \(B_\alpha = \sum _j V_{\alpha j}\, A_j\).
Let \(W\) be an isometry between two Kraus index spaces, so \(W^\dagger W = \mathbb {1}\). If \(K_j = \sum _\ell W_{j\ell } \widetilde K_\ell \), then the Kraus families \(\{ K_j\} \) and \(\{ \widetilde K_\ell \} \) define the same completely positive map.
Let \(U\) be a unitary \(r \times r\) matrix (\(U^\dagger U = \mathbb {1}\)) and suppose \(K_j = \sum _\ell U_{j\ell } \tilde{K}_\ell \). Then \(\{ K_j\} \) and \(\{ \tilde{K}_\ell \} \) define the same Kraus map: for every \(X \in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\),
Let \(\{ K_j\} _{j=0}^{r-1}\) and \(\{ K'_j\} _{j=0}^{r-1}\) be two Hilbert–Schmidt orthonormal Kraus families, and suppose \(K_j = \sum _{\ell =0}^{r-1} U_{j\ell }\, K'_\ell \). Then the transition matrix \(U\) is unitary: \(U^\dagger U = \mathbb {1}_r\).
Let \(\{ B_\alpha \} _{\alpha \in \iota }\) and \(\{ A_j\} _{j \in \iota }\) be two Kraus families with the same finite index set. Then the following are equivalent:
\(\sum _\alpha B_\alpha X B_\alpha ^\dagger = \sum _j A_j X A_j^\dagger \) for all \(X \in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\).
There exists a unitary matrix \(U = (U_{\alpha j})\) such that \(B_\alpha = \sum _j U_{\alpha j} A_j\) for every \(\alpha \).
Let \(A\) and \(B\) be nonzero complex square matrices whose Kronecker product \(A\otimes B\) is positive semidefinite. Then there is a scalar \(c\ne 0\) with \(cA\ge 0\) and \(c^{-1}B\ge 0\). Since \((cA)\otimes (c^{-1}B)=A\otimes B\), the rescaled factors represent the same product.
Let \(E^*\) be the adjoint of a trace-preserving Kraus map. If \(A\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) admits a positive semidefinite dominant \(B\) commuting with \(A\) and satisfying \(A^\dagger A\le B\), then
For a unital Kraus map \(E\), the Kadison–Schwarz gap decomposes as
Let \(E^*(X)=\sum _i K_i^\dagger X K_i\) be the adjoint Kraus map of a trace-preserving Kraus family, and let \(A\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be normal. Then the Schwarz gap
is positive semidefinite. Equivalently,
This is the completely positive case of [ Wol12 , Proposition 5.1 ] .
Let \(E\) be a Kraus map that is both unital and trace-preserving. If \(E(X) = \mu X\) with \(|\mu | = 1\), then the Kadison–Schwarz gap vanishes:
Let \(A\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be Hermitian and \(0\le k{\lt}D\). Then the sum of its \(k\) largest eigenvalues is the largest value of \(\operatorname{Re}\operatorname{tr}(PA)\) attained by an orthogonal projection \(P\) of rank \(k\):
This is Ky Fan’s maximum principle [ Fan49 ] ; see also [ Bha97 , Problem I.6.15, Exercise II.1.13 ] . For a positive semidefinite \(A\), where \(S_k(A)\) coincides with the Ky-Fan norm \(\| A\| _{(k)}\), it gives the extremal overlap of [ Wol12 , Lemma 3.1 ] .
Let \(\sigma \) be a fixed point of the adjoint transfer map \(\sum _i (A^i)^\dagger \sigma A^i = \sigma \), and let \(S\) be invertible with \(S^\dagger S = \sigma \). Define \(A'^i = SA^iS^{-1}\). Then \(\sum _i (A'^i)^\dagger A'^i = \mathbb {1}\), i.e. the gauged Kraus map is trace-preserving. This is the left-canonical normalization.
A normal left-canonical renormalization fixed-point tensor of nonzero virtual dimension has pairwise commuting length-two parent interactions on every periodic chain of length \(N{\gt}2\), and its periodic matrix product vector is annihilated by every such interaction. The removal of the left-canonical hypothesis and the ground-space spanning equation in [ CPGSV16 , Definition 3.9 ] remain separate.
Assume:
\(H_n(A,\varphi )=\mathbb {C}^D\) (length-\(n\) word products applied to \(\varphi \) span all of \(\mathbb {C}^D\)), and
for each standard basis vector \(e_j\), the rank-one operator \(|\varphi \rangle \! \langle e_j|\) lies in \(S_m(A)\).
Then \(S_{n+m}(A)=M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\).
For \(s\in [0,1]\), any matrix \(K\), and positive-definite matrices \(A_1,A_2,B_1,B_2\), write \(F_s(A,B):=\Re \operatorname{tr}(K^\dagger A^s K B^{1-s})\). This map is jointly concave. For \(t\in [0,1]\), set \(A_t:=tA_1+(1-t)A_2\) and \(B_t:=tB_1+(1-t)B_2\). Then
See [ Lie73 ; And79 ] . This statement is the positive-definite, boundary-exponent (\(x+y=1\)) case of the Ando–Lieb theorem [ Wol12 , Theorem 5.15 ] , which holds for positive semidefinite \(A,B\) and all exponents \(x,y\ge 0\) with \(x+y\le 1\).
For \(s\in [0,1]\), any matrix \(K\), and positive-semidefinite matrices \(A_1,A_2,B_1,B_2\), the map \((A,B)\mapsto \Re \operatorname{tr}(K^\dagger A^s K B^{1-s})\) is jointly concave, satisfying (??) of Theorem 20.6.10. This is the full Ando–Lieb theorem [ Wol12 , Theorem 5.15 ] on the boundary line \(x+y=1\) (with \(x=s\), \(y=1-s\)): the positive-definiteness restriction of Theorem 20.6.10 is lifted. The general two-exponent region is obtained in Theorem 20.6.12.
Let \(x,y\ge 0\) with \(x+y\le 1\). For any matrix \(K\) and positive-semidefinite matrices \(A_1,A_2,B_1,B_2\), write \(F_{x,y}(A,B):=\Re \operatorname{tr}(K^\dagger A^x K B^y)\). This map is jointly concave. For \(t\in [0,1]\), set \(A_t:=tA_1+(1-t)A_2\) and \(B_t:=tB_1+(1-t)B_2\). Then
This is Wolf’s Theorem 5.15 in the finite-dimensional matrix setting.
A Lindblad form with Hamiltonian \(H\) and operators \(\{ L_j\} \) defines the same linear map as the generator decomposition \((\phi ,\kappa )\) with \(\phi (\rho ) = \sum _j L_j\rho L_j^\dagger \) and \(\kappa = iH + \frac{1}{2}\sum _j L_j^\dagger L_j\). This is [ Wol12 , Equation (7.24) ] .
Let \(T : M_{D}(\mathbb {C}) \to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be linear. If \(T(|v\rangle \! \langle v|) = |v\rangle \! \langle v|\) for every \(v \in \mathbb {C}^D\), then \(T = \operatorname{id}\). In particular, a quantum channel preserving every pure state equals the identity.
If \(\{ \sigma _i\} \) is trace-self-dual, then every linear map \(T : M_{D}(\mathbb {C}) \to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) admits the expansion
Let \(A\) have positive bond dimension and a nonzero idempotent transfer map. Let \(\mu _q\) have unit modulus. If the literal bond direct sum \(\bigoplus _q \mu _qA\) has an idempotent transfer map, then \(\mu _q=\mu _{q'}\) for every pair \(q,q'\).
Let \(M\) be an MPO tensor whose generated \(N\)-site operator is positive semidefinite. Let \(A\) be an MPS tensor of bond dimension \(D'\geq 1\) whose \(N\)-site vector is nonzero. Suppose that, across the cut \(L\mid (N-L)\), the normalized state generated by \(M\) is obtained from the normalized pure state of \(A\) by trace-preserving completely positive maps \(\Phi _L\) and \(\Phi _R\) on the two blocks:
Then \(I_L(M)\leq 4\log D'\).
An MPO tensor satisfies the local purification RFP condition if and only if it has a local purification and its physical-trace transfer is idempotent:
Let \(A\) be injective, and assume \(u u^\dagger = \mathbb {1}\), \(\mathcal{E}_A(\mathbb {1})=\mathbb {1}\), \(\Lambda \) is positive definite, \(\operatorname{tr}(\Lambda )=1\), and \(\mathcal{E}_A^\dagger (\Lambda )=\Lambda \). Then virtual local covariance holds if and only if there exist a unitary \(V \in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) and a phase \(\mu \) with \(|\mu |=1\) such that \(\mathcal{E}_u(V) = \mu V\). By Theorem 12.3.18, this witness form is equivalent to the peripheral-spectrum condition \(\rho (\mathcal{E}_u)=1\).
Put \(q(A)=1-P_{G_2(A)}\) for the canonical two-site parent interaction. On the three-site space \(\mathcal{H}_A\otimes \mathcal{H}_X\otimes \mathcal{H}_B\), with sites \(0,1,2\) labelled \(A,X,B\), the two adjacent translated length-two parent interactions are the two local actions
This identifies the two translated parent interactions with the two supports appearing in [ CPGSV16 , Definition D.2 ] ; it does not assert that they commute.
Suppose the canonical two-site parent interaction \(q(A)=1-P_{G_2(A)}\) satisfies the overlapping \(AX/XB\) commutation condition of Definition 14.1.1. Then, on the three-site chain, \(h^{(3)}_0(A,2)h^{(3)}_1(A,2) = h^{(3)}_1(A,2)h^{(3)}_0(A,2)\). This only identifies the first two translated local terms with the lifted \(AX\) and \(XB\) actions; the construction of the [ CPGSV16 , Appendix D.2 ] projectors associated with the [ CPGSV16 , Appendix B ] basic-vector form is a separate step.
Suppose the Appendix D.2 projectors \(Q_{AX}\) and \(Q_{XB}\) satisfy the local parent-commuting condition on \(A X B\), and suppose that the canonical two-site parent interaction is their complement on both faces: \(q(A)=1-Q_{AX}=1-Q_{XB}\). Then the first two translated length-two local terms on the three-site chain commute, \(h^{(3)}_0(A,2)h^{(3)}_1(A,2) = h^{(3)}_1(A,2)h^{(3)}_0(A,2)\).
Suppose the projectors \(Q_{AX}\) and \(Q_{XB}\) satisfy the [ CPGSV16 , Definition D.2 ] local parent-commuting condition on \(A X B\), and suppose that the canonical two-site parent interaction is identified, as a two-site operator, with the two source projectors: \(q(A)=Q_{AX}\) and \(q(A)=Q_{XB}\). After lifting these two equalities to the \(AX\) and \(XB\) faces, the first two translated length-two local terms on the three-site chain commute. Thus, \(h^{(3)}_0(A,2)h^{(3)}_1(A,2) = h^{(3)}_1(A,2)h^{(3)}_0(A,2)\).
Let \(Q_{AX}\) and \(Q_{XB}\) be two-site projectors whose lifted \(AX\) and \(XB\) actions commute. Suppose that \(q(A)=Q_{AX}\) and \(q(A)=Q_{XB}\). Then the first two translated length-two local terms on the three-site chain commute.
For every qubit channel \(T : M_{2}(\mathbb {C}) \to M_{2}(\mathbb {C})\), there exist invertible completely positive maps \(\Phi _{1},\Phi _{2}\), both of Kraus rank one, such that the filtered channel \(T'=\Phi _{2}\circ T\circ \Phi _{1}\) is in one of the three Lorentz normal forms: diagonal, non-diagonal, or singular. These general filters include scalar freedom and are not restricted to determinant-one \(\operatorname{SL}(2,\mathbb {C})\) filterings. A proof requires the corresponding scalar normalization and the classification of Lorentz orbits.
Suppose \(P\) is an orthogonal projection satisfying \((\mathbb {1}-P)A^iP=0\) for every physical index \(i\). Then there exist \(n,m\) with \(n+m=D\) and MPS tensors \(A_1,A_2\) of bond dimensions \(n\) and \(m\) such that \(A\) and the two-block tensor \(A_1\oplus A_2\) generate the same MPV family in the sense of Definition 2.3.3.
Under the hypotheses of Theorem 9.1.1, assume in addition that \(P\neq 0\) and \(P\neq \mathbb {1}\). Then there exist \(n,m\) with \(n+m=D\), \(n{\lt}D\), and \(m{\lt}D\), together with block tensors \(A_1,A_2\), such that \(A\) and \(A_1\oplus A_2\) generate the same MPV family in the sense of Definition 2.3.3.
Fix a local-purification representation
with purifying MPS tensor \(\widetilde A\) of physical dimension \(d d_K\) and bond dimension \(D'\). For every \(N=L+K\), tracing all ancillary degrees of freedom gives
Define the normalized-form purifying operator by
where the inverse scalar is taken with the convention \(0^{-1}=0\). After reindexing across the cut \(L\mid K\),
This identity also holds when the common trace vanishes, in which case both normalized-form operators are zero.
This is the finite-chain channel identity from the purification preceding equation (4) of [ WVHC08 ] , under the explicit local purification of [ CPGSV16 , Section 4.3 ] .
Let \(M\) be an LPDO. For every decomposition \(N=L+K\), there exist an ancillary dimension \(d_K\), a purifying bond dimension \(D'\), and a local-purification family \(A\). Let \(\widetilde A\) be its associated purifying MPS tensor. Then
Let \(M\) be an LPDO. There exist an ancillary dimension \(d_K\), a purifying bond dimension \(D'\), and a local-purification family \(A\), all independent of the cut, such that for every decomposition \(N=L+K\),
where \(\widetilde A\) is the purifying MPS tensor associated with \(A\).
Fix a local-purification representation with purifying MPS bond dimension \(D'\). If the \(N\)-site operator is positive semidefinite and its purifying pure state is nonzero, then \(I_L(M)\leq 4\log D'\) for every \(L\leq N\).
Consequently, if \(M\) is an LPDO, \(N\geq 1\), and \(\operatorname{tr}\rho ^{(N)}(M)\neq 0\), then its local-purification representation supplies a bond dimension \(D'\) satisfying this estimate. The quantity \(D'\) is the bond dimension of the purifying MPS, not the MPO bond dimension \(D\).
On an even periodic chain of length \(N = 2m\ge 4\), let \(H_{N,\mathrm{MG}}^{(3)}\) be the range-three parent Hamiltonian of the Majumdar–Ghosh tensor, the periodic sum of translates of the local projector with kernel \(\mathcal G_3(A_{\mathrm{MG}})\). Then \(H_{N,\mathrm{MG}}^{(3)}\) has a two-dimensional ground space, spanned by the two nearest-neighbour singlet coverings \((1,2)(3,4)\cdots (N-1,N)\) and \((2,3)(4,5)\cdots (N,1)\). This two-fold degeneracy reflects the spontaneous breaking of the one-site translation symmetry of the spin-\(\tfrac 12\) chain \(H=\sum \boldsymbol {S}_i\cdot \boldsymbol {S}_{i+1} +\tfrac 12\sum \boldsymbol {S}_i\cdot \boldsymbol {S}_{i+2}\) of [ CPGSV21 ] .
The Majumdar–Ghosh tensor is not normal: no blocking length makes the products of that length span the full matrix algebra \(M_{3}(\mathbb {C})\). This non-normality is the algebraic signature expected from the two-periodic dimer-covering structure.
Under the same assumptions, \(\rho (P_L\otimes \mathbb {1}_R)=\rho \). For \(H_L=H_A\otimes H_X\) and \(H_R=H_B\), the two absorption identities are precisely the \(P_{AX}\) support-projector identities in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix D.2, lines 2228–2235 ] .
Consider a frustration-free Hamiltonian \(H=\sum _{i=1}^n h_i\) with projector interaction terms, \(h_i^2=h_i\). Suppose that for every unordered pair \(\{ i,j\} \) of overlapping terms there exist constants \(c_{\{ i,j\} } \ge 0\) and \(\gamma {\gt} 0\) satisfying
and suppose further that the coefficients attached to the terms overlapping \(h_i\) satisfy
for every \(i\). Then the smallest nonzero eigenvalue of \(H\) satisfies \(\lambda _{\min }^+(H) \ge \gamma \).
Let \(A\) be a finite Hermitian matrix. Choose an orthonormal eigenbasis \((u_k)_k\) with eigenvalues \((\lambda _k)_k\), and let \(E_k=|u_k\rangle \! \langle u_k|\) be the rank-one projection onto \(u_k\). Then \(A=\sum _k\lambda _kE_k\).
Let \(T\) be a finite real square matrix with \(T^2=T\). Then, for every positive integer \(N\), one has \(\operatorname{tr}(T^N)=\operatorname{tr}(T)\). This recovers the trace identity displayed in the proof of [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, Lemma C.5 ] from idempotence.
Let \(V\) be a module over a commutative ring, let \(l_1,\ldots ,l_n\in V\), let \(r_1,\ldots ,r_n\) be linear functionals on \(V\), and let \(T_{k,h}=(r_k|l_h)\) be the pairing matrix; for the tensors of [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2 ] this is the sector trace matrix. Assume the identity
whose right-hand side is the square of its left-hand side, so that the operator \(M=\sum _k|l_k)(r_k|\) satisfies \(M^2=M\). If the vectors \(l_1,\ldots ,l_n\) are linearly independent, then \(T^2=T\). The same conclusion holds if instead the functionals \(r_1,\ldots ,r_n\) are linearly independent.
In the setting of Theorem 26.10.6.29 with real scalars and linearly independent vectors \(l_1,\ldots ,l_n\), if in addition \(\operatorname{tr}(T)=1\), then there are real vectors \(a,b\) such that \(T=ab^\top \). This is the factorization \(T_{k,h}=a_kb_h\) obtained in the proof of [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, Lemma C.5 ] for the sector trace matrix, derived here from the displayed zero-correlation-length identity together with the linear independence of the \(l_k\), instead of the Perron–Frobenius trace-power argument of the source.
Let \(V\) be a real vector space, let \(l_1,\ldots ,l_n\in V\), let \(r_1,\ldots ,r_n\) be real linear functionals on \(V\), and let \(T_{k,h}=(r_k|l_h)\) be the pairing matrix, as in Theorem 26.10.6.29. Assuming only the identity \(M^2=M\) for the operator \(M=\sum _k|l_k)(r_k|\), without assuming linear independence of \(l_1,\ldots ,l_n\) or of \(r_1,\ldots ,r_n\), one has the following identities: the first unconditionally, the second for every \(N\geq 2\), and the third for every positive integer \(N\):
If \(\rho \) is positive semidefinite on a bipartite space \(A \otimes B\), then both reduced operators \(\operatorname{tr}_A \rho \) and \(\operatorname{tr}_B \rho \) are positive semidefinite.
Let \(T\) be a primitive real \(N\times N\) matrix, where \(N\geq 1\). Multiplication by a positive scalar preserves primitivity. If \(T^2=T^3\), then \(\operatorname{rank}(T^2)=1\). There are vectors \(a,b\in \mathbb R^N\) such that
This finite-dimensional matrix lemma supports the argument sought at [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, line 1613 ] ; it is not a theorem asserted there.
Let \(T\) be a primitive non-negative matrix. Then every row of \(T\) contains a strictly positive entry, and so does every column.
Let \(K\subseteq L\) be a faithful field extension, let \(\iota :K\hookrightarrow L\) be the inclusion, and let \(A\) be a finite matrix over \(K\). Then \(\operatorname{rank}_{L}\! \left((\iota (A_{ij}))_{ij}\right)=\operatorname{rank}_{K}A\).
Let \(\phi \in \mathbb {C}^{D}\otimes \mathbb {C}^k\) be a normalized vector with reduced density matrix \(\rho =\operatorname{tr}_2|\phi \rangle \! \langle \phi |\) on the first factor, and let \(1\le n{\lt}D\). The largest squared overlap \(|\langle \phi | \psi \rangle |^2\) attained by a normalized vector \(\psi \) of Schmidt rank at most \(n\) is the Ky-Fan \(n\)-norm of \(\rho \):
Because \(\rho \) is positive semidefinite, this norm is the sum of its \(n\) largest eigenvalues, which coincide there with its singular values. This is [ Wol12 , Lemma 3.1 ] for \(1\le n{\lt}D\); the top index \(n=D\), where the value is \(\operatorname{tr}\rho =1\), is Theorem 22.2.2.4.
At the top index \(n=D\), the Schmidt-rank constraint \(\operatorname{SR}(\psi )\le D\) is vacuous, so the largest squared overlap is the Ky-Fan \(D\)-norm of \(\rho \):
The maximum is attained at \(\psi =\phi \). The Ky-Fan \(D\)-norm sums all eigenvalues, so for a normalized \(\phi \) it reduces to \(\| \rho \| _{(D)}=\operatorname{tr}\rho =1\). Together with Theorem 22.2.2.3, this covers the full range \(1\le n\le D\) of [ Wol12 , Lemma 3.1 ] .
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be positive and trace preserving, and suppose that \(T^*\) satisfies the Schwarz inequality. Set \(\rho _0=T_\infty (\mathbb {1})\), and let \(V:\mathcal H\to \mathbb {C}^D\) be an isometry onto the support of \(\rho _0\). Then \(\widetilde T(Y)=V^*T(VYV^*)V\) has a positive definite fixed point. Moreover, \(T(B)=B\) if and only if there is a fixed point \(Y\) of \(\widetilde T\) such that \(B=VYV^*\). There are positive integers \(d_k,m_k\), a unitary \(U\) on \(\mathcal H\), and positive definite density matrices \(\sigma _k\in M_{m_k}(\mathbb {C})\) such that
This is the maximal-support application of the full-support step in the proof of [ Wol12 , Theorem 6.14 ] . This intermediate theorem does not itself transport the displayed decomposition back to the original space and adjoin the complementary zero summand; that final step is Theorem 25.8.5.
For \(d_C\ge 1\), the matrix \(\tau _C=d_C^{-1}\mathbb {1}_C\) is positive definite and has trace one.
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be positive and trace-preserving, and let \(T_\infty \) be its mean-ergodic projection. Then \(\rho _0=T_\infty (\mathbb {1})\) is positive semidefinite and fixed by \(T\). With \(Q_0\) the support projection of \(\rho _0\), every fixed point \(X\) of \(T\) satisfies \(Q_0XQ_0=X\). This is the maximal-support property of fixed points in Section 6.4 of [ Wol12 ] .
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be positive and have bounded orbits, and let \(T_\infty \) be its mean-ergodic projection. Then \(\rho _0=T_\infty (\mathbb {1})\) is positive semidefinite and fixed by \(T\). If \(Q_0\) is the support projection of \(\rho _0\), then every fixed point \(X\) of \(T\) satisfies \(Q_0XQ_0=X\). This is the bounded-orbit form of the maximal-support argument underlying [ Wol12 , Proposition 6.9 ] .
Let \(T(X)=\sum _iK_iXK_i^\dagger \) be trace-preserving and let \(\rho \succeq 0\) be a fixed point of \(T\) whose rank bounds the rank of every fixed-point density matrix: \(\operatorname{rank}\sigma \leq \operatorname{rank}\rho \) for every \(\sigma \succeq 0\) with \(\operatorname{tr}(\sigma )=1\) and \(T(\sigma )=\sigma \). Then the support projection \(Q\) of \(\rho \) satisfies \(QXQ=X\) for every fixed point \(X\) of \(T\).
Let \(T(X)=\sum _iK_iXK_i^\dagger \) be trace-preserving. There is a positive semidefinite fixed point \(\rho _0\) of \(T\) such that every fixed point \(X\) of \(T\) arises as \(X=\sqrt{\rho _0}\, Y\sqrt{\rho _0}\) for a corner-supported \(Y\) with \(\sqrt{\rho _0}\, Y\sqrt{\rho _0}\) fixed by \(T\).
Let \(E\) be a unital Kraus map. Then
Together these are the Kraus-map specialization of Theorem 5.6.1.3.
Let \(V\) be finite-dimensional and let \(f:V\to V\) have bounded orbits. For every \(x\in V\), the Cesàro averages satisfy
Moreover,
and \(P_fx=x\) if and only if \(fx=x\). The complex matrix specialization underlying [ Wol12 , Equation (6.14) ] is given below.
- LinearMap.HasBoundedOrbits.tendsto_birkhoffAverage_meanErgodicProjection
- LinearMap.HasBoundedOrbits.range_meanErgodicProjection
- LinearMap.HasBoundedOrbits.meanErgodicProjection_apply_eq_self_iff
- LinearMap.HasBoundedOrbits.isIdempotentElem_meanErgodicProjection
- LinearMap.HasBoundedOrbits.meanErgodicProjection_apply_meanErgodicProjection
- LinearMap.HasBoundedOrbits.comp_meanErgodicProjection
- LinearMap.HasBoundedOrbits.meanErgodicProjection_comp
Under the hypotheses of Theorem 25.7.10, the mean-ergodic projection of \(T\) satisfies
Consequently,
Here each summand is written on \(\mathbb {C}^{m_k}\otimes \mathbb {C}^{d_k}\), so \(\operatorname{tr}_{m_k}\) traces the first factor. This is the full-support part of Equation (6.63) in [ Wol12 , Theorem 6.14 ] ; the density matrices are not yet asserted to be positive definite.
If \(P_K=P_{AX}\circ P_{XB}\) is idempotent-product data, then
This is the algebraic consequence corresponding to equation (D.2) from [ CPGSV16 ] : \(K_{AXB}=(K_{AX}\otimes H_B)\cap (H_A\otimes K_{XB})\). The source equation itself also carries the tensor-product local-subspace hypotheses.
For every \(X\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) and \(N\geq 0\),
where \(A^\sigma =A^{\sigma _1}\cdots A^{\sigma _N}\) denotes the word evaluation of Definition 2.1.2.
Let \(K\) saturate the area law and have zero correlation length, and let its horizontal BNT canonical form, up to block-diagonal gauge, have normal representatives \(A_s\), common copy weights \(\mu _s\), and copy numbers \(n_s\). Assume that the physical-trace transfer of every \(A_s\) is nonnilpotent. After a common blocking, assume explicitly that the simultaneous one-letter word tuples of the \(A_s\) span the direct sum of their full matrix algebras. Put \(\mathcal K_s=\mu _sA_s\).
For every nonempty chain, define
Then \(p_s^{(N)}{\gt}0\), and every nonempty prefix marginal has the same sector decomposition with these probabilities. Translation invariance identifies the other contiguous blocks of the same length. Consequently, every absorbed representative \(\mathcal K_s\) saturates the area law.
The one-letter simultaneous span is the block-injective canonical-form hypothesis imposed at the start of Case II in [ CPGSV16 , line 1628 ] . Its relation with finite physical blocking is recorded in docs/paper-gaps/cpgsv17_bicf_block_separation.tex. The entropy conclusion is the argument of [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1748–1781 ] .
- MPOTensor.bntSectorProbability
- MPOTensor.bntSectorProbability_pos
- MPOTensor.normalizedMPO_eq_sum_bntSectorProbability_smul
- MPOTensor.reducedBlockState_eq_sum_bntSectorProbability_smul
- MPOTensor.blockEntropy_eq_sum_bntSectorProbability
- MPOTensor.blockEntropy_add_blockEntropy_eq_bntSector
- MPOTensor.commonWeightAbsorbedBasisMPOTensor_isSAL_of_projectorSelection
- MPOTensor.commonWeightAbsorbedBasisMPOTensor_isSAL_of_sameMPV₂Pos
Let \(K\) have zero correlation length and let \(\mathcal K_s=\mu _sA_s\) be an absorbed BNT element of its horizontal canonical form. If the physical-trace transfer \(\mathcal B_s\) is not nilpotent, then \(\mathcal K_s\) has zero correlation length. More precisely,
This is the final zero-correlation-length conclusion in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, line 1781 ] .
Suppose that the active one-site matrices span \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) and each active sector contains a nonzero such matrix. Then for every \(k,h\in I_*\) there is a directed walk
such that \(\eta _{k_j,k_{j+1}}\ne 0\). In particular, every active sector has an outgoing nonzero neighboring operator.
For every sector entry, the one-site matrix used in the directed-cut argument equals the virtual matrix used in the spanning argument. If all sector virtual matrices span \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) and the matrices in every zero-weight sector vanish, then \(\operatorname{span}\{ A_{k;x,y}:k\in I_*\} =M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\).
Suppose that \(M\) is in normalized BNT-refined horizontal form and generates positive operators. Assume exact coisometric reconstructions of its one-site and blocked vertical tensors, positive multiplicities and weights for the blocked BNT, and normality of its BNT representatives. For every active product corner \(j\), one has \(0{\lt}\lambda _j\zeta _j\).
Suppose that the one-site vertical tensor has the stated exact coisometric reconstruction, and let \((A^{(2)}_\gamma )_\gamma \) be a basis of normal tensors for the blocked vertical tensor. For every active product corner \(A_j\) there are a label \(\gamma (j)\), an equality of bond dimensions, an invertible matrix \(X_j\), and a scalar \(\zeta _j\) of modulus one such that, after transporting the blocked tensor along the dimension equality,
The choices may be made simultaneously. No converse coverage or surjectivity of \(j\mapsto \gamma (j)\) is asserted.
Scope restriction (active product BNT): The conclusion gives only one-way coverage of active product corners. It does not assert that every blocked BNT label occurs. This is documented in docs/paper-gaps/cpsv16_bnt_uniqueness_zero_coefficient.tex.
Local fix (per-pair support): Appendix C.4, lines 2011–2029 of [ CPGSV16 ] compares a sum over all retained copy pairs and does not isolate a fixed pair. Here fixed-pair support follows from the exact squared reconstruction and the canonical direct-sum corner; a zero pair contributes an empty active family. See docs/paper-gaps/cpsv16_figure11_per_pair_support.tex.
Under the hypotheses of the preceding positivity theorem, for every active product corner \(j\) there is a real number \(\omega _j{\gt}0\) such that
Suppose that the active one-site matrices span \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) and each active sector contains a nonzero such matrix. For every \(S\subseteq I_*\), \({\cal A}_S+{\cal A}_{I_*\setminus S}=M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), and both spaces are nonzero when the corresponding sector sets are nonempty. If \(\eta _{k,h}=0\) for \(k\in S\) and \(h\in C\), then \({\cal A}_S{\cal A}_C=0\).
Suppose that the neighboring operators are positive semidefinite, the active one-site matrices span \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), each active sector contains a nonzero such matrix, and every nonzero edge closes through a third active sector. Then \((T^{*3})_{k,k}{\gt}0\) for every \(k\in I_*\). Together with the length-two returns and irreducibility, this implies that \(T^*\) is primitive.
Suppose that the active one-site matrices span \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) and each active sector contains a nonzero such matrix. For every \(k\in I_*\) there is an \(h\in I_*\) such that
If the neighboring operators are positive semidefinite, then \((T^{*2})_{k,k}{\gt}0\).
Suppose that the neighboring operators are positive semidefinite, the active one-site matrices span \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), and each active sector contains a nonzero such matrix. Then the non-negative matrix \(T^*\) is irreducible.
If every neighboring operator is positive semidefinite, then \(T^*\) is entrywise non-negative and \(T^*_{k,h}{\gt}0\Longleftrightarrow \eta _{k,h}\ne 0\).
Let \({\cal K}\) be injective and suppose that it satisfies SAL and source zero correlation length. Then there are a physical-sector factorization, weights \(p_k\geq 0\) with \(\sum _k p_k=1\), and positive semidefinite neighboring operators \(\eta _{k,h}\) such that the active trace matrix
is primitive. There is also a real number \(\lambda {\gt}0\) for which, upon setting \(\widehat T^*:=\lambda ^{-1}T^*\), one has \((\widehat T^*)^2=(\widehat T^*)^3\). For every positive integer \(N\), \(\operatorname{tr}((\widehat T^*)^N)=\operatorname{tr}(\widehat T^*)\). Thus the primitivity and the two normalized identities concern the same active, positively rephased trace matrix. No idempotence, rank-one, or semisimplicity conclusion is asserted.
Assume the doubled tensor is trace-preserving and the transfer map admits a positive-definite fixed point. If, for every positive blocked size \(n\),
then the algebra-structure formulation holds.
There exists an MPO tensor of physical and bond dimension two such that the doubled tensor is trace-preserving, the transfer map has a positive-definite fixed point, and the support-algebra condition holds, but the fusion condition does not hold.
Suppose that the periodic operators are positive semidefinite and have nonzero trace at every positive chain length. For every \(N\) and every \(1\leq m\leq \lfloor N/2\rfloor \), divide the chain into four consecutive regions of lengths \(m-1,1,N-m-1,1\). If the marginal on the first three regions admits a quantum Markov decomposition on its one-site middle system, then the tensor saturates the area law.
Let \(\varphi :\{ 0,\ldots ,d^2-1\} \to \{ 0,\ldots ,d-1\} ^2\) be the canonical bijection. Then \((K^{[2]})^{i,j} =(K^{[L]})^{\varphi (i),\varphi (j)}\bigm |_{L=2}\). Consequently, for every nonempty chain length \(N\), the closed MPO of \(K^{[2]}\) is obtained from the closed MPO of the general length-two block by applying \(\varphi \) independently at every ket and bra site. In particular, if \(K\) generates matrix product density operators, then so does \(K^{[2]}\).
Suppose that the labelled tensors of a length-independent fusion family form a source basis of normal tensors. There is one common positive blocking at which they determine a complete zipper fusion family. Its bond dimensions are the original labelled bond dimensions, its fusion multiplicities are \(N_{\alpha \beta }^{\gamma }=\dim \chi _{\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma }\), its synthesis map is the adjoint of \(U_{\alpha ,\beta }\), and its analysis map is \(U_{\alpha ,\beta }\), after the canonical identification \(\mathbb {C}^{D_\alpha D_\beta } \cong \mathbb {C}^{D_\alpha }\otimes \mathbb {C}^{D_\beta }\). In particular, the two zipper identities, literal reconstruction, injectivity, and the simultaneous block-letter inverse are conclusions; none is an additional hypothesis.
Assume that the neighboring operators are positive semidefinite and that there are real families \((a_k)_k,(b_k)_k\) satisfying \(\operatorname{tr}(\eta _{k,h})=a_kb_h\) and \(\sum _k a_kb_k=1\). Let \(\mathcal K^{[2]}\) be the tensor obtained by blocking two adjacent sites of \(\mathcal K\). Then \(\mathcal K^{[2]}\) is a renormalization fixed point in the sense of Definition 26.2.1. This is [ CPGSV16 , Theorem 4.9, (iv)\(\Rightarrow \)(v) ] .
Assume that every blocked BNT label has positive multiplicity and that the blocked vertical tensor has the exact coisometric reconstruction \(T=U_2^\dagger C_2U_2\). Let \(E_{\gamma ,0}\) be the canonical inclusion of the first copy of label \(\gamma \), and put \(F_\gamma =U_2^\dagger E_{\gamma ,0}\). Then \(F_\gamma \) is an isometry, intertwines \(T\) with the distinguished weighted BNT copy in both directions, and compresses \(T\) to that copy exactly. For an active product corner covered by \(\gamma \), transport \(F_\gamma \) along the stated equality of bond dimensions. The transported map remains an isometry and obeys the corresponding transported compression identity.
- MPOTensor.blockedReferenceInclusion
- MPOTensor.blockedReferenceInclusion_isometry
- MPOTensor.blockedReference_intertwine
- MPOTensor.blockedReference_intertwine_adjoint
- MPOTensor.blockedReference_compression
- MPOTensor.RetainedProductSpectralFamily.FlatBlockedBNTComparison.referenceInclusion
- MPOTensor.RetainedProductSpectralFamily.FlatBlockedBNTComparison.referenceInclusion_isometry
- MPOTensor.RetainedProductSpectralFamily.FlatBlockedBNTComparison.reference_compression
Let \(\widehat{\mathcal K}^{[2]}\) be the tensor obtained by blocking two adjacent sites of the sector-coordinate tensor \(\widehat{\mathcal K}\). Then \(\widehat{\mathcal K}^{[2]}\) is a renormalization fixed point in the sense of Definition 26.2.1. More precisely, after the canonical identifications of one blocked site with two original sites and two blocked sites with four original sites, the required channels are \(\widehat{\mathcal S}^2\) and \(\widehat{\mathcal T}^2\).
Under the hypotheses and with the sector correspondence of Theorem 26.9.77, let \(B\) be the vertical reading of the two-site blocking, and write \(O_L(A)=\operatorname{Tr}_{\mathrm{bond}}(A_{i_1}\cdots A_{i_L})\) for the length-\(L\) closed-chain operator. If \(L{\gt}0\), then the same equivalence \(\sigma \), dimension identifications, and unitaries appearing in the tensor-letter identity satisfy
These are the two representations in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.4, lines 2011–2018 ] .
Local fix (blocked coefficient exponent): CPSV16 Appendix C.4, line 2013 prints \(m_\gamma ^L/n_\gamma \). The line-2008 tensor scaling and line 2040 give \((m_\gamma /n_\gamma )^L\). This is documented in docs/paper-gaps/cpsv16_blocked_operator_trace_ratio_exponent.tex.
- MPOTensor.transportedVerticalSector_exists_blockedOperatorRepresentations
- MPOTensor.verticalBNTMPO_verticalTensor_blockTwo
- MPSTensor.sameMPV₂Pos_of_coisometry_reconstruction
- MPOTensor.mpo_verticalBNTMPO_verticalAssembledTensor_eq_sum
- MPOTensor.mpo_verticalBNTMPO_eq_sum_of_coisometry_reconstruction
- MPOTensor.mpo_verticalBNTMPO_eq_pow_smul_of_unitary_reindex
- MPOTensor.blockedVerticalOperatorRepresentations_of_unitaryBlockEquiv
Let \(M\) be an MPDO in normalized BNT-refined horizontal form, equipped with a tensor-attached BNT algebra clause \(\widetilde M=\bigoplus _\alpha \mu _\alpha \otimes M_\alpha \). There is a vertical canonical decomposition of the two-site blocking,
Its normal-tensor sectors are in bijection, via \(\sigma \), with the sectors of the full-support one-site product expansion such that \(M_\gamma \) and \(A_{\sigma (\gamma )}\) generate the same matrix product vectors at every positive length and, for every \(\gamma \),
as multisets. Thus this two-site decomposition and relabelling realize the multiplicity-spectrum comparison of Appendix C.4, lines 2046–2058 of [ CPGSV16 ] . Moreover, the paired bond dimensions agree and there are invertible matrices \(Z_\gamma \) satisfying
exactly. This is only the invertible-gauge sub-result of lines 2053–2057; no unitary choice of \(Z_\gamma \) follows from this statement.
Scope restriction (BNT-refined horizontal form): the normalized BNT-refined horizontal hypothesis is stronger than the literal CPSV canonical-form hypothesis.
Suppose that the chosen blocked-basis coefficients are compared with a fixed BNT-label coefficient system, and that this BNT-label system has a positive length-independent \(\chi \)-witness. Then the chosen blocked bases carry a positive blocked \(\chi \) trace-power witness. The construction is obtained by pulling back the BNT-label \(\chi _{\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma }\)-matrices along the source and target label maps.
- MPOTensor.BNTBlockedBasisCoefficientComparison.blockedLabel
- MPOTensor.BNTBlockedBasisCoefficientComparison.pulledBlockedChiFamily
- MPOTensor.BNTBlockedBasisCoefficientComparison.pulledBlockedChiFamily_toDiagonal_of_pos
- MPOTensor.BNTBlockedBasisCoefficientComparison.pulledBlockedChiFamily_toDiagonal_posEntries
- MPOTensor.BNTBlockedBasisCoefficientComparison.pulledBlockedChi_tracePowerCoeff_of_pos
- MPOTensor.BNTBlockedBasisCoefficientComparison.pulledBlockedChi_dim_of_pos
- MPOTensor.BNTBlockedBasisCoefficientComparison.pulledBlockedChi_trace_matrix_pow_of_pos
- MPOTensor.BNTBlockedBasisCoefficientComparison.toPositiveBlockedStructureChiTracePowerForm
Suppose that the labelled doubled-index tensors form the basis of normal tensors, and that their fusion-isometry family has positive trace-power coefficients independent of the positive chain length. Then there is one integer \(L{\gt}0\) such that the blocked tensors \(M_\gamma ^{[L]}\) span their full product matrix algebra in one letter. Hence every \(M_\gamma ^{[L]}\) is injective.
For this same \(L\), write
where \(r_{\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma }\) is the dimension of the specialized chi space. The original fusion isometry satisfies
the two blocked zipper identities
and the literal reconstruction
- MPSTensor.wordTupleSpanTop_reindexPhysical_equiv
- MPSTensor.WordTupleSpanTop.isInjective_one
- MPOTensor.BNTFusionIsometryFamily.blockedUnweightedDirectSumLetter
- MPOTensor.BNTFusionIsometryFamily.blocked_fusion_of_lengthIndependent
- MPOTensor.BNTFusionIsometryFamily.fusionIsometry_mul_blocked_mulTensor_of_lengthIndependent
- MPOTensor.BNTFusionIsometryFamily.blocked_mulTensor_mul_fusionIsometry_conjTranspose_of_lengthIndependent
- MPOTensor.BNTFusionIsometryFamily.blocked_mulTensor_eq_conjTranspose_mul_unweightedDirectSum_mul
- MPOTensor.BNTFusionIsometryFamily.exists_positive_block_with_injective_fusion
Suppose the active-sector fusion clause holds for a chosen vertical canonical decomposition. Then the algebra clause holds for the same decomposition. For every positive chain length \(L\), its coefficients are \(c^{(L)}_{\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma } =\operatorname{tr}(\chi _{\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma }^{L})\), determined by the same diagonal matrices. Thus statement (iii) implies statement (ii) of [ CPGSV16 , Theorem 4.14, lines 972–993 ] . No assertion concerning the renormalization fixed-point condition is made here.
For a coefficient system satisfying the same-length product law for a BNT-label operator family and in trace-power form, at every positive length \(L\) at which the labelled operators are linearly independent, the associativity constraint is a restriction on the family of diagonal matrices:
In [ CPGSV16 , Section 4.5 ] these restrictions, combined with the isometry statement, lead to a pentagon-like equation for the fusion isometries whose solutions come from unitary fusion categories.
At every positive length \(L\) at which the operators are linearly independent, the structure coefficients of the same-length product law satisfy
These are the restrictions that the associativity of the multiplication imposes on the structure coefficients, noted in [ CPGSV16 , Section 4.5 ] .
If the BNT trace scalars satisfy the idempotent coefficient condition and the BNT-label coefficients come from a positive length-independent \(\chi \)-witness, then
If the BNT trace scalars satisfy the idempotent coefficient condition with the coefficient family canonically determined by a diagonal \(\chi \)-family, then
Suppose a BNT-label coefficient system is in trace-power form \(c^{(L)}_{\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma } = \operatorname{tr}(\chi _{\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma }^{\, L})\) with positive diagonal matrices \(\chi _{\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma }\), and is length independent. Then every diagonal entry \(\chi _{\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma ,r}\) lies in \(\{ 0,1\} \), as stated in [ CPGSV16 , Section 4.5 ] ; by positivity every entry equals one. Consequently, at every positive length, \(c^{(L)}_{\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma } = r_{\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma } \in \mathbb {N}\).
- MPOTensor.DiagonalChiFamily.entry_eq_one_of_posEntries_of_forall_tracePowerCoeff_eq
- MPOTensor.DiagonalChiFamily.matrix_eq_one_of_forall_entry_eq_one
- MPOTensor.BNTLabelCoefficientFamily.HasPositiveLengthChiTracePowerForm.entry_eq_one_of_lengthIndependent
- MPOTensor.BNTLabelCoefficientFamily.HasPositiveLengthChiTracePowerForm.entry_eq_zero_or_eq_one_of_lengthIndependent
- MPOTensor.BNTLabelCoefficientFamily.HasPositiveLengthChiTracePowerForm.coeff_eq_dim_of_lengthIndependent
- MPOTensor.BNTLabelCoefficientFamily.HasPositiveLengthChiTracePowerForm.exists_natCast_coeff_of_lengthIndependent
- MPOTensor.PositiveBNTLabelChiTracePowerForm.entry_eq_one_of_lengthIndependent
- MPOTensor.PositiveBNTLabelChiTracePowerForm.coeff_eq_dim_of_lengthIndependent
If a BNT-label coefficient system is in trace-power form with respect to a diagonal \(\chi \)-family all of whose entries equal one, then for every \(L{\gt}0\), \(c^{(L)}_{\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma } = r_{\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma }\), so the coefficient system is length independent.
If the same-length BNT product identity holds and the BNT-label coefficients come from a positive length-independent \(\chi \)-witness, then for every \(L{\gt}0\),
If the same-length BNT product identity holds with the coefficient family canonically determined by a diagonal \(\chi \)-family, then for every \(L{\gt}0\),
Let \(c^{(L)}_{\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma }\) be the coefficient family and let \(\chi _{\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma }\) be the positive diagonal matrices carried by the theorem data. For every \(L{\gt}0\),
where \(c^{\chi }\) is the canonical coefficient family determined by \(\chi \), and every diagonal entry of every \(\chi _{\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma }\) is strictly positive. Consequently, for every \(L{\gt}0\), the same-length product identity reads
and, at \(L=1\), the idempotent identity reads
BNT-label theorem data give a positive blocked-basis \(\chi \) trace-power witness by pulling the length-independent BNT-label \(\chi \)-family back along the blocked-basis comparison maps: writing \(\chi _{n,i,j,k}\) for the resulting blocked-basis diagonal matrix at a positive blocked length \(n\), \(\chi _{n,i,j,k} =\chi _{\sigma _n(i),\sigma _n(j),\tau _n(k)}\). Thus the two matrices have equal size, diagonal entries, and traces of all powers.
- MPOTensor.BNTLabelTheoremData.toPositiveBlockedStructureChiTracePowerForm
- MPOTensor.BNTLabelTheoremData.positiveBlockedChi_toDiagonal_of_pos
- MPOTensor.BNTLabelTheoremData.positiveBlockedChi_tracePowerCoeff_of_pos
- MPOTensor.BNTLabelTheoremData.positiveBlockedChi_dim_of_pos
- MPOTensor.BNTLabelTheoremData.positiveBlockedChi_trace_matrix_pow_of_pos
- MPOTensor.BNTLabelTheoremData.positiveBlockedChi_tracePower
- MPOTensor.BNTLabelTheoremData.positiveBlockedChi_posEntries
- MPOTensor.BNTLabelTheoremData.positiveBlockedChi_entry_pos
An existential BNT-label theorem witness gives a positive blocked-basis \(\chi \) trace-power witness for the chosen algebra-structure data: a blocked \(\chi \)-family with positive diagonal entries such that, for every positive blocked length \(n\),
The blocked-basis \(\chi \)-family is the pullback of the BNT-label \(\chi \)-family along the source and target comparison maps \(\sigma _n,\tau _n\). The proposition-level nonempty form of the witness gives the same existential blocked-basis family, stated either through this trace-power predicate or through the coefficient equation it unfolds to.
- MPOTensor.BNTLabelTheoremWitness.toPositiveBlockedStructureChiTracePowerForm
- MPOTensor.BNTLabelTheoremWitness.positiveBlockedChi_toDiagonal_of_pos
- MPOTensor.BNTLabelTheoremWitness.positiveBlockedChi_tracePowerCoeff_of_pos
- MPOTensor.BNTLabelTheoremWitness.positiveBlockedChi_dim_of_pos
- MPOTensor.BNTLabelTheoremWitness.positiveBlockedChi_trace_matrix_pow_of_pos
- MPOTensor.BNTLabelTheoremWitness.positiveBlockedChi_tracePower
- MPOTensor.BNTLabelTheoremWitness.positiveBlockedChi_posEntries
- MPOTensor.BNTLabelTheoremWitness.positiveBlockedChi_entry_pos
- MPOTensor.HasBNTLabelTheoremWitness.positive_blocked_chi_witness
- MPOTensor.HasBNTLabelTheoremWitness.exists_blocked_chi_trace_power_form
- MPOTensor.HasBNTLabelTheoremWitness.exists_blocked_chi_pullback
- MPOTensor.HasBNTLabelTheoremWitness.exists_blocked_coeff_eq_trace_pow
Suppose the structure coefficients have positive trace-power form and are independent of the positive chain length. Then \(\chi _{\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma }=1_{r_{\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma }}\) for every triple of labels. If
the fusion isometries satisfy
These are the identity-weight specialization of Equations (19)–(21) in [ BMW\(^{+}\)17 , Section 3 ] . The MPDO fusion identity appears in [ CPGSV16 , Theorem 4.14(iii), lines 986–991 ] ; its identity-weight specialization follows from the length-independent case at [ CPGSV16 , line 1010 ] .
- MPOTensor.BNTFusionIsometryFamily.chi_matrix_eq_one_of_lengthIndependent
- MPOTensor.BNTFusionIsometryFamily.fusionIsometry_mul_mulTensor_of_lengthIndependent
- MPOTensor.BNTFusionIsometryFamily.mulTensor_mul_fusionIsometry_conjTranspose_of_lengthIndependent
- MPOTensor.BNTFusionIsometryFamily.mulTensor_eq_conjTranspose_mul_unweightedDirectSum_mul_of_lengthIndependent
Let \(x=(s,\alpha _1,\beta _1)\) and \(y=(t,\alpha _3,\beta _3)\). Comparing the two expressions for the same outer inverse contraction gives
Here \(\kappa ^{(s)}_{\beta _1,\alpha _3}(i,j) ={(\mathcal K_s^{ij})}_{\beta _1,\alpha _3}\). Thus both the normal-sector and Markov-sector off-diagonal entries are retained in the statement, rather than being suppressed by a prior choice of equal labels. This is the full entrywise identity used in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1719–1732 ] .
The closing entry \({(R_s)}_{\beta _3,\alpha _1}\) is the corrected tail-index orientation of the display at lines 1422–1438, recorded in docs/paper-gaps/cpgsv17_mpdo_sal_zcl_eta_local_structure.tex.
If \(p_k\ne 0\), then there is a normal sector \(s\) for which \(O_s^{(k)}\ne 0\).
This is the existence part of equation QkKjs in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1733–1737 ] . Restricting to \(p_k\ne 0\) is the literal version of the source’s preceding removal of summands for which \(Q_k\sigma _3^{(N)}Q_k=0\).
Suppose, in addition, that every closing matrix \(R_s\) is nonzero. If \(p_k\ne 0\), there is a unique normal sector \(j_k\) for which \(O_{j_k}^{(k)}\ne 0\).
This is the cancellation argument in equation QkKjs. The stated nonzero-closing-matrix condition isolates the step obtained in the source from simplicity and the common-weight choice at [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1714–1718 ] . Its derivation from those preceding hypotheses is Theorem 26.10.1.11.
Fix a normal sector \(s\) and virtual indices \(\alpha _1,\beta _3\) for which \({(R_s)}_{\beta _3,\alpha _1}\ne 0\). Then, for every \(\beta _1,\alpha _3\) and every pair of distinct Markov sectors \(k\ne k'\), one has
Thus each physical slice of the \(s\)-th normal tensor is block diagonal in the Markov decomposition. This is equation Qks in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1682–1688 and 1730–1735 ] .
The nonzero closing entry uses the corrected orientation \({(R_s)}_{\beta _3,\alpha _1}\) recorded in docs/paper-gaps/cpgsv17_mpdo_sal_zcl_eta_local_structure.tex.
Suppose that the BNT algebra clause holds and that the one-site and two-site vertical multiplicity spectra have been compared as above. Then every two-site multiplicity matrix has the prescribed trace:
This is the normalization used for the preparation matrix \(\nu _\gamma /m_\gamma \) in the algebra-to-RFP implication of [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.4, lines 2058–2064 ] .
Let \(\Gamma _{x,y}\) denote the outer inverse contraction. In the basis of the chosen Hayashi decomposition,
In particular, the probability \(p_k\) remains explicit. This identity requires neither a nonvanishing condition on \(p_k\) nor assumptions of saturated area law or zero correlation length.
Suppose that the source BNT projectors have been constructed after the common physical blocking, and let \(\mathcal K_s\) be the normal representative with its common copy weight absorbed. Then \(\mathcal K_s\) admits a physical support restriction to the range of \(P_s\). In particular, for some isometry \(V_s\),
and the restricted tensor \(V_s^*\mathcal K_sV_s\) is injective.
Under the hypotheses of Theorem 26.10.2.21, the resulting projectors satisfy \(P_sA_iP_t=0\) whenever \(s\ne t\) or \(i\ne s\). For the matching label, they satisfy \(P_iA_iP_i=A_i\). Consequently, \(\sum _sP_sA_iP_s=A_i\), which is the local diagonal decomposition required for the sector entropy argument. Equivalently, compressing the physical legs of \(A_i\) by \(P_s\) retains \(A_i\) for \(s=i\) and gives the zero local tensor otherwise. This is the local projection relation in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1680–1755 ] .
The Markov summands of zero Hayashi weight are retained in the ambient decomposition. They annihilate every normal-sector physical slice, so the displayed local identities do not require the stronger assertion \(\sum _sP_s=\mathbb {1}\) outside the active support.
- MPOTensor.bntSectorProjection_mul_physicalSlice_mul_eq_zero
- MPOTensor.bntSectorProjection_mul_physicalSlice_mul_self
- MPOTensor.sum_bntSectorProjection_mul_physicalSlice_mul_self
- MPOTensor.changePhysicalBasis_bntSectorProjection_basis
- MPOTensor.exists_bntProjectorSelection_positiveLength_of_sameMPV₂Pos_isSAL
For every nonempty periodic chain and every normal-sector label \(s\),
This is equation sigmaNKj in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1756–1759 ] .
Here and throughout the MPDO discussion, a periodic chain has positive length.
Every \(P_s\) is an orthogonal projection, distinct \(P_s\) are mutually orthogonal, and \(\sum _s P_s=P_{\mathrm{act}}\).
Suppose that the BNT physical projectors \(P_x\) have been selected and that every common-weight-absorbed representative \(\mathcal K_x\) satisfies SAL. Then there are positive two-site bonds \(B^{(x)}\) such that the projections \(P_x\) are pairwise orthogonal,
all cyclic translates of each \(B^{(x)}\) commute pairwise, and, for every \(N\geq 2\),
Thus the absorbed BNT representatives have an orthogonally supported family of commuting sector products with normalization scalar one.
Let \(x=(s,\alpha _1,\beta _1)\) and \(y=(t,\alpha _3,\beta _3)\). For a three-site family closure and a simultaneous left inverse, the outer inverse contraction vanishes when \(s\ne t\). When \(s=t\), it is \((\mathcal K_s^{i_2j_2})_{\beta _1,\alpha _3} (R_s)_{\beta _3,\alpha _1}\). In particular, the contraction retains precisely one entry of the middle physical slice and one entry of the closing matrix, with the orientation shown above. This is the sector-family form of the Case I contraction in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1415–1438 ] . The basis-of-normal-tensors inverse is constructed at lines 1666–1676 and the resulting contraction is used in the Case II calculation at lines 1719–1732 of the same appendix. The closing entry \(R_s(\beta _3,\alpha _1)\) is the corrected tail-index orientation of the display at lines 1422–1438, recorded in docs/paper-gaps/cpgsv17_mpdo_sal_zcl_eta_local_structure.tex.
For every pair of labels and physical indices, write \(G_{\alpha ,\beta }^{ij} =\bigoplus _\gamma \chi _{\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma } \otimes M_\gamma ^{ij}\). The fusion isometry satisfies the two chi-weighted zipper identities
The corresponding identities in [ BMW\(^{+}\)17 , Equation (21) ] have identity matrices on the multiplicity spaces in place of the positive diagonal matrices \(\chi \). Their unweighted form requires the length-independent integer specialization and is not a consequence of the present hypotheses. Even after that specialization, comparison of the two triple-fusion orders and final-label separation are still needed to construct an invertible \(F\)-move.
Let \(L\in \mathbb {N}\), and let
concatenate the \(N\) blocked words. For blocked configurations \(\sigma \) and \(\tau \),
The algebraic identity holds for every \(L\in \mathbb {N}\). For \(L\geq 1\), positivity of the original nonempty chain of length \(NL\) shows that blocking \(L\) adjacent physical sites of an MPDO again gives an MPDO. This is the closed-chain identification implicit when the one-site tensor and its two-site blocking are placed in vertical canonical form in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.4, lines 1952–2017 ] .
Let \({\cal K}\) be injective. Let \(R\) and \(\rho \) give a three-site closure of \({\cal K}\), choose a Hayashi decomposition of \(\rho \), and fix virtual indices \(\alpha _1,\beta _3\) such that \(R_{\beta _3,\alpha _1}\ne 0\). Form the corresponding closed sector tensors \(|l_k)\) and \((r_k|\). If \({\cal K}\) has source zero correlation length, set \(S:=\sum _k |l_k)(r_k|\). Then there is a real number \(\lambda {\gt}0\) such that
If \({\cal K}\) is the canonically normalized representative satisfying \(\mathcal T_{\cal K}^2=\mathcal T_{\cal K}\), then the raw pairing operator itself satisfies \(S^2=S\). This is the display preceding [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, Lemma C.5 ] ; the first identity records the rescaling-invariant form of the same zero-correlation-length condition.
More generally, any sector factorization \(U_B\kappa _{\beta ,\alpha }U_B^\dagger =\bigoplus _k(l_k)_\beta \otimes (r_k)_\alpha \) gives the closed-sector pairing operator
This identifies the transfer matrix of Definition 26.4.1 with the operator on the left-hand side of the zero-correlation-length identity in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1489–1493 ] .
Under the hypotheses of Theorem 26.10.4.7, suppose that \({\cal K}\) has source zero correlation length. There is a real number \(\lambda {\gt}0\) such that, for \(\widehat T:=\lambda ^{-1}T\), one has
For every positive integer \(N\), one also has
This is the valid trace-power display in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1490–1497 ] . No idempotence or rank-one conclusion for \(\widehat T\) is asserted.
Let \(\mathcal K\) be injective and let \(\rho \) be its three-site closure against \(R\). Applying the inverse tensor at the two outer sites collapses the closure to one entry of the middle physical slice and one entry of the tail:
Consequently, for any matrix \(U\) on the middle site,
Suppose the weights over each representative are independent of the copy index, and none of the physical-trace transfers \(\mathcal B_j=\sum _i A_j^{ii}\) is nilpotent. There is one positive tail length \(L\) such that, for every representative \(A_j\), some virtual indices \(\alpha ,\beta \) satisfy \(\widetilde m_j=[\mathcal B_j^L]_{\alpha ,\beta }\ne 0\). At total chain length \(L+3\), the corresponding copy coefficient is \(q_j=\sum _q\mu _{j,q}^{L+3}\ne 0\). Thus the three-site closing matrix satisfies
This is the traced-tail selection made in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1714–1718 ] .
After absorbing the common weight, the matrix product vector of the assembled tensor is
This is equation CFK of [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1660–1665 ] ; the same multiplicities occur in equation sigmaNKj of [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1756–1759 ] .
Let \(r_j\) be the number of horizontal copies of representative \(j\). Then its coefficient on a chain of length \(N\) is
Thus the natural multiplicity is the horizontal copy count \(r_j\).
The common weight is nonzero, and hence for every chain length \(N\),
This is the coefficient nonvanishing used in the choice \(m_j=q_j\widetilde m_j\) in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1714–1718 ] . It does not assert nonvanishing of the independent virtual tail contraction \(\widetilde m_j\).
Let \(M\) be an MPO tensor whose doubled-index tensor is injective, and let \(Q\) be an idempotent on the physical space (Hermiticity is not needed). If \(Q_1H^{(2)}=H^{(2)}Q_1\), then \(Q\widetilde M=Q\widetilde MQ\).
Let \(B\) be a pair-indexed positive bond whose periodic translates commute. There are a unitary coordinate decomposition \(H\cong \bigoplus _q H_{q,r}\otimes H_{q,l}\) and positive semidefinite operators \(\eta _{q,h}\) on \(H_{q,r}\otimes H_{h,l}\). After regrouping the two-site coordinates, the \((q,h)\)-sector is \(H_{q,l}\otimes (H_{q,r}\otimes H_{h,l})\otimes H_{h,r}\), and in these regrouped coordinates
The unitary and the neighboring operators depend only on the fixed bond, and hence are independent of a chain length or bond position.
A single positive commuting bond is the one-sector instance of the explicit GSNNCH decomposition, with sector projection equal to the identity and multiplicity one.
There is an injective normal tensor \(\mathcal K\), of physical dimension two and bond dimension one, which generates MPDOs and has source zero correlation length, together with one positive two-site bond \(B\) whose translates commute. For every \(N\geq 2\),
while the trace matrix of a chosen two-sector Beigi factorization is
In particular, \(T\) is not primitive.
This shows that primitivity cannot be inferred for an arbitrary selected factorization in the step suggested at [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, line 1613 ] . The same tensor also has a one-sector factorization with positive semidefinite neighboring operator and primitive trace matrix. Hence the example does not exclude a source-faithful minimal or visible-sector selection, and it does not disprove the stated commuting-form-to-SAL implication.
The three-edge and two-edge composites of the forward printed \(F\)-matrices are equal. The corresponding composites of the inverse \(F\)-matrices are also equal. In the upper/lower convention of [ BMW\(^{+}\)17 , equation (33) ] , the latter equality is
Every displayed entry denotes the inverse of the forward matrix in the \(F\)-move convention.
Fix \(a,b,c,d\in \Lambda \). There is an invertible matrix
whose rows are indexed by \((f,\lambda ,\sigma )\) and whose columns are indexed by \((e,\mu ,\nu )\). Its entries satisfy
The matrix in the opposite orientation is its two-sided inverse. This is the printed \(F\)-move of [ BMW\(^{+}\)17 , Section 3.4 ] .
If \(X_{k,h}\) is the \((k,h)\) diagonal block of \(X\), then
For every pair \((k,h)\), the operator \(\overline\eta _{k,h}\) is positive semidefinite with trace one. Hence \(\overline{\mathcal S}_{k,h}\) is trace-preserving and completely positive. If \(a_kb_h\ne 0\), then both the density matrix and the preparation equal their normalized active forms.
- MPOTensor.ExplicitEtaOperators.completedEta_pos
- MPOTensor.ExplicitEtaOperators.trace_completedEta
- MPOTensor.ExplicitEtaOperators.completedEta_eq_normalizedEta
- MPOTensor.ExplicitEtaOperators.completedEta_preparationMap_isKrausCPTP
- MPOTensor.ExplicitEtaOperators.completedEtaPreparationMap_eq_normalized
If \(X_{k,h}\) is the \((k,h)\) diagonal block of \(X\), then
For every pair \((k,h)\), the operator \(\overline\Omega _{k,h}\) is positive semidefinite with trace one. Hence \(\overline{\mathcal T}_{k,h}\) is trace-preserving and completely positive. On every active pair it equals the normalized active preparation.
- MPOTensor.ExplicitEtaOperators.completedOmega_pos
- MPOTensor.ExplicitEtaOperators.trace_completedOmega
- MPOTensor.ExplicitEtaOperators.completedOmega_eq_normalizedOmega
- MPOTensor.ExplicitEtaOperators.completedOmega_preparationMap_isKrausCPTP
- MPOTensor.ExplicitEtaOperators.completedOmegaPreparationMap_eq_normalized
For every matrix \(U\) on the physical space and every \(N\ge 1\),
In particular \(\rho ^{(N)}(\widetilde{\cal K})\ge 0\) whenever \(\rho ^{(N)}({\cal K})\ge 0\).
Suppose that for every \(k\) the sectorwise Kraus family resolves the identity, \(\sum _a A_{k,a}^\dagger A_{k,a}=I_{H_k}\). Then the orthogonally controlled map \(\mathcal C\) is trace-preserving and completely positive.
Let \(N\geq 1\) and let \(k=(k_0,\ldots ,k_{N-1})\) be a cyclic sector configuration. If \(k_n\notin C\) for some \(n\), then \(\Omega _k=0\). Thus deleting the sectors outside \(C\) leaves every finite cyclic neighboring product unchanged. For every linear contraction \(\Phi \), including a composition of reindexings and partial traces, \(\Omega _k=0\) implies \(\Phi (\Omega _k)=0\).
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.isCyclicActiveSector_of_cyclic_edges
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.neighboringOperator_ne_zero_of_cyclicNeighboringProduct_ne_zero
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.isCyclicActiveSector_of_cyclicNeighboringProduct_ne_zero
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.cyclicNeighboringProduct_eq_zero_of_not_isCyclicActiveSector
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.cyclicNeighboringProduct_eq_zero_of_not_forall_isCyclicActiveSector
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.map_cyclicNeighboringProduct_eq_zero_of_not_forall_isCyclicActiveSector
Let \(\mathcal K\) be injective and have source zero correlation length, and suppose its neighboring operators are positive semidefinite. There are \(\lambda {\gt}0\) and strictly positive functions \(a,b\) on the cyclic-active sectors, normalized by \(a\mathbin {\boldsymbol \cdot }b=1\), such that every fourth-region marginal is a direct sum over retained sector words of the unchanged interior neighboring product tensored with the separated left and right boundary factors determined by \(a\) and \(b\).
Under the hypotheses of Theorem 26.11.35, for arbitrary \(A,C\geq 0\), the fourth-region marginal on consecutive regions of lengths \(A\), \(1\), and \(C\) admits a Hayashi Markov decomposition. The middle site decomposes as the direct sum of its left and right sector factors. Each block is the tensor product of normalized positive left and right path states, and its probability is the product of their unnormalized traces divided by the positive periodic normalization.
Let \(C\) be the set of cyclic-active sectors and suppose that every neighboring operator is positive semidefinite. For \(q,h\in C\),
More generally, if \(B_{q,h}(X)\) denotes the outer boundary operator in the three-site closure, then
Here \(\operatorname{tr}_{\mathrm{mid}}\) traces both neighboring factors. No equality between \(T_C\) and \(T_C^2\) is asserted.
For every \(\lambda \in \mathbb {R}\), set \(\widehat T_C=\lambda ^{-1}T_C\). The same calculation with each fully traced edge multiplied by \(\lambda ^{-1}\) gives
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.sum_cyclicActive_trace_mul_trace_eq_pow_two
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.neighboringOperator_trace_eq_cyclicActiveSectorTraceMatrix
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.sum_cyclicActive_normalized_trace_mul_trace_eq_pow_two
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.sum_cyclicActive_partialTraceRight_threeSiteSectorClosure
Suppose that the virtual dimension is positive, the MPO tensor is injective, and every \(\eta _{k,h}\) is positive semidefinite. Then \(C\) is nonempty and the matrix \(T\) is primitive. More precisely, \(T\) is irreducible and every \(k\in C\) satisfies
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.exists_sectorVirtualMatrix_ne_zero_of_isCyclicActiveSector
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.isCyclicActiveSector_of_sectorVirtualMatrix_ne_zero
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.sectorVirtualMatrix_eq_zero_of_not_isCyclicActiveSector
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.nonempty_cyclicActiveSector
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.cyclicActiveSectorOneSiteMatrixFamily_span_eq_top
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.cyclicActiveSector_exists_sectorVirtualMatrix_ne_zero
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.exists_cyclicActive_two_edge_return
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.cyclicActiveSectorTraceMatrix_isIrreducible
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.cyclicActiveSectorTraceMatrix_pow_two_diag_pos
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.cyclicActiveSectorTraceMatrix_pow_three_diag_pos
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.cyclicActiveSectorTraceMatrix_isPrimitive
Under the hypotheses of Theorem 26.11.32, suppose that the physical-trace transfer has source zero correlation length. There is a number \(\lambda {\gt}0\) such that, with \(\widehat T=\lambda ^{-1}T\),
and \(\operatorname{tr}(\widehat T^m)=\operatorname{tr}(\widehat T)\) for every \(m\geq 1\). By matrix multiplication, the two-step coefficient is \((\widehat T^2)_{k,h}=\sum _{q\in C}\widehat T_{k,q}\widehat T_{q,h}\). The assertion neither identifies \(\widehat T\) with \(\widehat T^2\) nor implies that the unreduced Beigi trace matrix is primitive or rank one.
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.cyclicActiveLeftRestriction
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.cyclicActiveLeftRestriction_leftTensor
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.cyclicActiveLeftRestriction_rightTensor
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.cyclicActiveLeftRestriction_neighboringOperator
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.reindex_cyclicActiveLeftRestriction_activeSectorTraceMatrix
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.cyclicActiveSectorTraceMatrix_normalized_relations_of_isSourceZCL
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.cyclicActiveSectorTraceMatrix_rank_pow_two_eq_one
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.normalized_cyclicActiveSectorTraceMatrix_rank_pow_two_eq_one
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.exists_normalized_cyclicActiveSectorTraceMatrix_rank_pow_two_eq_one_of_isSourceZCL
For every positive length \(N\), and with \(\sigma _N=\sigma _0\) and \(\tau _N=\tau _0\), the closed matrix-product operator of the cyclic edge-weight tensor is
In the virtual trace there is precisely one potentially nonzero cyclic virtual configuration.
Let \({\cal K}\) be an MPDO whose transformed physical slices satisfy the sector factorization hypothesis. Then for every \(N\ge 1\) and every cyclic sector assignment \(k_1,\ldots ,k_N\) with \(k_{N+1}=k_1\),
This is the positivity half of the display at [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1446–1450 ] .
Let \(M\) generate matrix product density operators. If displaced projectors of \(M\) never commute, then periodic vectors of \(M\) supply cyclic projectors, and the vertically viewed tensor \(\widetilde M\) has no nontrivial \(p\)-periodic vectors. This narrows the hypothesis of the periodic-sector step in the proof of [ CPGSV16 , Proposition 4.13, lines 1888–1893 ] to the canonical-form implication of lines 1874–1887: every other ingredient of the step is proved.
Let \(M\) generate matrix product density operators. If periodic vectors of \(M\) supply cyclic projectors, then they supply periodic-sector projectors, and the vertically viewed tensor \(\widetilde M\) has no nontrivial \(p\)-periodic vectors. This reduces the hypothesis of the periodic-sector step in the proof of [ CPGSV16 , Proposition 4.13, lines 1888–1893 ] to the cyclic decomposition of the peripheral spectrum of the vertical transfer map.
Let \(N\geq 1\) and let \(k_0,\ldots ,k_{N-1}\) be a cyclic sequence of sectors. Fix matrix indices in the left and right factor of every sector, and abbreviate
With all site labels read modulo \(N\),
This is the entrywise cyclic contraction at [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1446–1450 ] .
Let \(\mathcal A=\prod _\alpha M_{d_\alpha }\), and let \(F:\mathcal A\to \mathcal A\) be positive and trace preserving. Suppose that the trace adjoint \(F^*\) satisfies the Schwarz inequality and that \(F\) fixes a family \(\rho =(\rho _\alpha )_\alpha \) for which every \(\rho _\alpha \) is positive definite. If \(\mathcal F=\operatorname{Fix}(F)\), then, for every \(L{\gt}0\), \(\dim C_L(\mathcal F)\leq \dim \mathcal F\).
Let \(F\) be a positive trace-preserving endomorphism of \(\mathcal A=\prod _\alpha M_{d_\alpha }\). Suppose that each \(V_j\) is fixed by \(F\) and, for some \(L{\gt}0\), the identity belongs to
Then there is a fixed family \(\rho =(\rho _\alpha )_\alpha \) such that every \(\rho _\alpha \) is positive definite.
This is a local finite-product consequence used to formalize the fixed-point argument in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.4, lines 1980–1993 ] ; CPSV16 applies Wolf’s density-block description directly rather than stating this intermediate result.
Let \(S\) and \(C\) be sets of sectors. If \(\eta _{k,h}=0\) for every \(k\in S\) and \(h\in C\), then \(XY=0\) for every \(X\in \mathcal{A}_S\) and \(Y\in \mathcal{A}_C\). No conclusion in the reverse product order is asserted. This is the directed local-orthogonality implication used in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1463–1470 ] .
Let \(M\) be an MPO tensor and let \(\widetilde M\) carry a nontrivial \(p\)-periodic vector, presented as in Definition 9.7.3: an irreducible restriction \(B\) of \(\widetilde M\) to a minimal invariant subspace, reached through an isometry \(V\), with a positive definite transfer eigenvector \(\rho \) of eigenvalue \(r{\gt}0\) and a transfer eigenvalue \(\mu \ne r\) of modulus \(r\). Then there are an exponent \(q\ge 1\) and an orthogonal projector \(Q\) on the physical space such that \(QA_w=QA_wQ\) for every product \(A_w\) of \(q\) letters of \(\widetilde M\), while \(Q\widetilde M\ne Q\widetilde MQ\) in the sense of Definition 23.4.31. This realizes the projector that the proof of [ CPGSV16 , Proposition 4.13, lines 1889–1891 ] draws from the general theory of the peripheral spectrum.
Let \(B\) be a translation-invariant positive two-site bond, written as an operator \(\widehat B\) on an ordered pair of physical spaces. Under the same three-site identification for both translates,
Thus these two operators are respectively the left and right overlapping lifts of \(\widehat B\). Moreover, \(\widehat B\) is Hermitian and the two lifts commute. These are exactly the local hypotheses needed for the Bravyi–Vyalyi decomposition invoked at [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1599–1605 ] .
- MPOTensor.reindex_embedLocalOperator_zero_eq_leftOverlappingLift
- MPOTensor.reindex_embedLocalOperator_one_eq_rightOverlappingLift
- MPOTensor.TranslationInvariantBondData.pairBond_isHermitian
- MPOTensor.TranslationInvariantBondData.reindex_bondAt_zero_eq_leftOverlappingLift
- MPOTensor.TranslationInvariantBondData.reindex_bondAt_one_eq_rightOverlappingLift
- MPOTensor.TranslationInvariantBondData.overlappingLifts_pairBond_comm
- MPOTensor.EtaLocalStructureData.pairBond_isHermitian
- MPOTensor.EtaLocalStructureData.reindex_bondAt_zero_eq_leftOverlappingLift
- MPOTensor.EtaLocalStructureData.reindex_bondAt_one_eq_rightOverlappingLift
- MPOTensor.EtaLocalStructureData.overlappingLifts_pairBond_comm
Let \({\cal K}\) be an injective MPO tensor satisfying SAL. Then it admits a physical-sector factorization for which every neighboring operator \(\eta _{k,h}=\sum _a (r_k)_a\otimes (l_h)_a\) is positive semidefinite. Zero-weight Hayashi sectors remain in the physical direct sum, but their right tensors may be set to zero without changing the physical slices.
- MPOTensor.conjugated_middle_threeSiteClosure
- MPOTensor.exists_active_sectorVirtualMatrix_ne_zero
- MPOTensor.zeroWeightReparameterizedInverseMapPhysicalSectorFactorization_isRecurrentSupport
- MPOTensor.exists_rephase_zeroWeightInverseMap_posSemidef
- MPOTensor.exists_positive_inverseMapPhysicalSectorFactorization
- MPOTensor.exists_positive_physicalSectorFactorization_of_isSAL
Let \((\eta _{k,h})\) be a neighboring-operator family for which every nonempty cyclic tensor product is positive semidefinite. Suppose, in addition, that every nonzero edge \(k\to h\) admits a directed return path from \(h\) to \(k\). Then there are unit complex numbers \(z_k\) such that \(z_k^{-1}z_h\, \eta _{k,h}\geq 0\) for all \(k\) and \(h\). Consequently, if the neighboring operators arise from the inverse-map physical-sector factorization of an injective MPDO and its nonzero support is recurrent, the sector tensors admit a reciprocal rephasing for which all neighboring operators are positive semidefinite. This factorization determines the positive commuting nearest-neighbor product structure of Proposition C.8.
This is a scope-restricted result. Recurrence is not a hypothesis of Lemma C.4 in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1406–1450 ] . Its derivation for the zero-weight reparameterized inverse-map factorization is treated in Theorem 26.10.4.41 and recorded in docs/paper-gaps/cpgsv17_mpdo_sal_zcl_eta_local_structure.tex.
Let \(N\geq 1\), and fix a cyclic sector assignment \(k_0,\ldots ,k_{N-1}\) such that every operator \(\eta _{k_n,k_{n+1}}\) is nonzero. If the corresponding cyclic tensor product is positive semidefinite, then there are nonzero scalars \(c_n\) satisfying
This is a choice on one fixed cycle. It does not assert that choices made on two different cycles agree on a common edge.
Let \(B\ge 0\) be a two-site bond whose periodic translates commute. There is a positive integer \(R\) and a matrix-product tensor \(C\) of virtual dimension \(R\), both independent of the chain length, such that for every \(N\ge 2\),
The construction gives a positive \(R\) independent of \(N\). No normality, zero-correlation-length, or scalar normalization hypothesis is required.
- MPOTensor.reindex_mpo_cyclicEdgeWeightTensor_etaCyclicEdgeWeight
- MPOTensor.TranslationInvariantBondData.nonempty_fixedProductTensorData
- MPOTensor.TranslationInvariantBondData.fixedProductTensorData
- MPOTensor.EtaLocalStructureData.nonempty_fixedProductTensorData
- MPOTensor.EtaLocalStructureData.fixedProductTensorData
Suppose one fixed tensor \(C\) generates the products of the bond carried by an eta-local structure. Then the doubled-index tensors of \(M\) and \(C\) are eventually nonzero proportional. The proof uses only lengths \(N\ge 2\) and therefore assumes no relation at length one.
Let \(\eta _{q,h}\) be arbitrary matrices on \(H_{q,r}\otimes H_{h,l}\) with a rank-one trace factorization. For a nonempty retained sector word \(k=(k_0,\ldots ,k_{L-1})\), write
The edge contraction corresponding to tracing the two boundary sites of the longer cyclic chain is
This is the edge-coordinate interpretation of the displayed fourth-region trace in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1606 and 1613–1617 ] .
Let \(\widehat B\) be a pair-indexed positive two-site bond whose periodic translates commute. There are positive dimensions \(d_{l,q}=\dim H_{q,l}\) and \(d_{r,q}=\dim H_{q,r}\), a unitary decomposition \(H\cong \bigoplus _{q=0}^{K-1}H_{q,l}\otimes H_{q,r}\), and Hermitian operators \(R_q\) on \(H\otimes H_{q,l}\) and \(S_q\) on \(H_{q,r}\otimes H\) such that
The basis bijection for each sector enumerates the numerical indices in right–left order,
Writing \(e(q,(r,s))\) for this basis bijection, the left and right spatial coordinates are respectively
Hence the tensor factors in the displayed block actions occur in left–right order.
Let \(\sigma ^{(N)}(\mathcal K)\) be realized, for every \(N\ge 2\), by translates of one positive commuting bond. There are one unitary \(U\), positive sector dimensions, and positive semidefinite operators \(\eta _{q,h}\), all independent of \(N\), such that for every \(N\ge 2\) there is a constant \(c_N{\gt}0\) satisfying, with \(k_N=k_0\),
Here \(E_N\) is the cyclic regrouping from the edge factors \(H_{k_n,r}\otimes H_{k_{n+1},l}\) to the site factors \(H_{k_n,r}\otimes H_{k_n,l}\). The factor \(c_N\) is retained from the proportionality relation in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1571–1576 ] . The passage at [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1603–1605 ] suppresses this factor when invoking the coefficient-free equation sigmaNK2; the coefficient-free assertion is not part of the present theorem.
- MPOTensor.sitewisePhysicalMatrix_conjTranspose
- MPOTensor.reindex_sitewisePhysicalMatrix_two
- MPOTensor.sitewisePhysicalMatrix_one
- MPOTensor.sitewisePhysicalMatrix_mul_conjTranspose
- MPOTensor.singleKrausMap_bondProduct_of_unitary
- MPOTensor.EtaLocalStructureData.exists_positive_cyclic_eta_block_decomposition
The same \(\eta \)-local structure gives a single-bond product witness on every finite periodic chain.
An \(\eta \)-local structure together with the doubled-index transfer condition gives the corresponding single-bond branch.
The \(\eta \)-local structure itself determines a single-bond commuting-form witness for every chain length \(N\ge 2\): writing \(B\) for its bond, the translated copies commute, \([B_{i,i+1},B_{j,j+1}]=0\), and there exists \(c{\gt}0\) with
This is the one-bond product conclusion used in [ CPGSV16 , Proposition C.8 ] .
- MPOTensor.EtaLocalStructureData.hasCommutingForm
- MPOTensor.EtaLocalStructureData.formAt_realizes
- MPOTensor.EtaLocalStructureData.formAt_bondAt_comm
- MPOTensor.EtaLocalStructureData.exists_positive_scalar_mpo_eq_product
- MPOTensor.EtaLocalStructureData.positive_commuting_product_form
- MPOTensor.hasCommutingForm_of_etaLocalStructure
The single positive bond determined by the \(\eta \)-local structure gives the one-sector instance of the explicit GSNNCH decomposition.
Suppose that a physical-sector factorization of \(K\) is given and that every neighboring operator \(\eta _{k,h}\) is positive semidefinite. Then the physical two-site bond determines an \(\eta \)-local structure for \(K\). Its translated copies commute pairwise, and for every \(N\geq 2\), \(\rho _N=B_0B_1\cdots B_{N-1}\). If the virtual dimension of \(K\) is positive, then \(K\) itself is a fixed tensor representation of this product family, with the same virtual dimension. Thus the positive normalization scalar may be chosen to be \(1\). This is Proposition C.8 conditional on the coherently positive physical-sector factorization that the source derives from SAL.
Let \(A\) be the normal doubled-index source tensor of positive bond dimension \(D\), and let \(C\) be a fixed tensor for its commuting-bond product. Suppose that \(sC\) is normal for some \(s{\gt}0\). Then there is a complex number \(\zeta \), with \(|\zeta |=1\), such that, for every \(N\ge 2\),
This is a conditional reduction: it does not assert that \(C\), or any rescaling of \(C\), is normal.
Let \(A\) be the normal doubled-index source tensor of positive bond dimension \(D\), let \(C\) be a fixed tensor for its commuting-bond product, and suppose that \(sC\) is normal for some \(s{\gt}0\). Then the unit phase is trivial. For every \(N\ge 2\),
Thus a positive normal rescaling of the fixed product tensor already supplies the positive geometric realization law.
The trace matrix induced by the extracted family is entrywise \(T_{k,h}=1\) in both its complex-valued form and its real-valued form. If there are \(m\) sectors, then \(T=\mathbf{1}\mathbf{1}^{\mathsf T}\) and \(\operatorname{tr}(T)=m\).
The trace is
Under the rank-one trace factorization, this becomes
This is the trace calculation in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1531–1535 ] .
Suppose that, in one fixed coordinate decomposition \(H\cong \bigoplus _q H_{q,r}\otimes H_{q,l}\), after regrouping the two-site coordinates according to this decomposition, a two-site operator has the form
For every \(N\ge 2\), regroup the cyclic chain as
Then, in these coordinates and with \(k_N=k_0\),
At \(N=2\), the two translated windows have the opposite orders \((0,1)\) and \((1,0)\) and give the two oriented factors \(\eta _{k_0,k_1}\) and \(\eta _{k_1,k_0}\).
In the setting of Theorem 26.10.4.39, assume in addition that the nonzero neighboring operators occur in symmetric pairs: \(\eta _{k,h}=0\) forces \(\eta _{h,k}=0\). Then there is a positive semidefinite family \(\eta '_{k,h}\) with \(\eta '_{k,k}=\eta _{k,k}\) and, for every pair of sectors, scalars \(c_{k,h}\ne 0\) with \(\eta '_{k,h}=c_{k,h} \eta _{k,h}\) and \(\eta '_{h,k}=c_{k,h}^{-1} \eta _{h,k}\). In particular every two-site block \(\eta '_{k,h}\otimes \eta '_{h,k}=\eta _{k,h}\otimes \eta _{h,k}\) of the sector-adapted decomposition is unchanged.
The source asserts at [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1446–1450 ] that the \(\eta \)’s can be chosen positive semidefinite, without the symmetric-support hypothesis. That hypothesis excludes a scalar obstruction: a nonzero neighboring operator whose reverse pair vanishes is constrained only by cycles through at least three sectors, and a coherent choice for the whole family can then fail.
Every product \(a_kb_h\) is non-negative. If \(a_kb_h=0\), then \(\eta _{k,h}=0\) and \(\Omega _{k,h}=0\).
Suppose that \(K\) is equipped with a physical-sector factorization \(F\). Let \(B_i\) denote the cyclic translate beginning at site \(i\) of the physical two-site bond determined by \(F\). For every \(N\geq 2\), the \(N\)-site periodic operator is
No positivity, zero-correlation-length, injectivity, or normalization hypothesis is required. This is the product identity in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, Proposition C.8, lines 1581–1593 ] , conditional here on the given physical-sector factorization.
Let \(\mathcal K\) be injective with nonzero four-site trace, let \(\rho \) be a three-site closure of \(\mathcal K\) against the normalized fourth-site tail \(R_4\), and choose a Hayashi decomposition of \(\rho \). Then there exist sector tensors \(l_k\) and \(r_k\) such that, for all virtual indices \(\beta _1,\alpha _3\),
The neighboring operators \(\eta _{k,h}\) are assembled from these tensors in Definition 26.10.3.1; the remaining steps of [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, Lemma C.4 ] prove the all-length identity and primitivity.
The matrix \(\tau _H\) is positive definite and has trace one.
Every fiberwise form of \(\mathcal T_0\) and \(\mathcal S_0\) is trace-preserving and completely positive.
Every fiberwise shift is trace-preserving and completely positive.
Suppose that the positive trace-power coefficients are independent of the positive chain length and that the labelled operators are eventually linearly independent. Then, for each final label \(\varepsilon \),
Consequently a matrix between the two fixed-final multiplicity spaces is square. This is the numerical associativity statement of [ BMW\(^{+}\)17 , lines 237–241 ] ; it does not assert completeness of the fusion maps or invertibility of the fixed-final comparison.
For every matrix \(P\in M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\) and every chain length \(N+1\),
The marked site closes to the loop with \(P\) inserted, and the remaining \(N\) sites close to plain loops. If \(P\) is idempotent, then also \(\operatorname{tr}(P_1H^{(N+1)}P_1)=\operatorname{tr}(E_P E^N)\).
Let \(M\) generate an MPDO and let \(P=P^\dagger \) satisfy \(PM=PMP\) on the vertically viewed tensor. For every total length \(L\geq 1\), write \(P_1=P\otimes \mathbb {1}^{\otimes (L-1)}\). Then \(P_1H^{(L)}=P_1H^{(L)}P_1=H^{(L)}P_1\). This is the equality chain in the proof of [ CPGSV16 , Proposition 4.13 ] ; the proposition assumes \(P\) is an orthogonal projector, but only self-adjointness of \(P\) is used.
Let \(C\) be the selected fixed tensor of the preceding theorem. There are physical sectors \(\mathbb {C}^d\cong \bigoplus _{q=0}^{K-1}H_q^L\otimes H_q^R\), a unitary \(U\), and matrices \(L_\beta (q)\) and \(R_\alpha (q)\) such that, writing \(C_{\beta ,\alpha }\) for the physical matrix at fixed virtual indices,
The neighboring operators \(\eta _{q,h}=\sum _a R_a(q)\otimes L_a(h)\) are positive semidefinite. If \(U_2\) denotes the induced two-site change of coordinates, then
Thus the physical-sector factorization belongs to the same tensor \(C\) whose closed operators are the fixed products of \(B\).
- MPOTensor.TranslationInvariantBondData.exists_positive_physicalSectorFactorization_fixedProductTensorData
- MPOTensor.TranslationInvariantBondData.PositivePhysicalSectorFixedProductTensorData
- MPOTensor.TranslationInvariantBondData.nonempty_positivePhysicalSectorFixedProductTensorData
- MPOTensor.TranslationInvariantBondData.positivePhysicalSectorFixedProductTensorData
- MPOTensor.TranslationInvariantBondData.fixedProductTensorDataPhysicalSectorFactorization
- MPOTensor.TranslationInvariantBondData.fixedProductTensorDataPhysicalSectorFactorization_physicalBond_eq
- MPOTensor.TranslationInvariantBondData.fixedProductTensorDataPhysicalSectorFactorization_neighboring_pos
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.etaSectorFinEquiv
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.sectorCoordinateBond_etaPair_decomposition
Let \(F\) be a linear endomorphism of \(\mathcal A=\prod _\alpha M_{d_\alpha }\). Suppose that the following three conditions hold, with the second required for every bond matrix \(X\):
Then \(F=\operatorname{id}_{\mathcal A}\).
This is the finite-dimensional conclusion in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.4, lines 1980–1993 ] . It does not assume that the products \(V_c(X_1)\cdots V_c(X_L)\) are fixed.
Let \(F\) be a positive trace-preserving endomorphism of \(\mathcal A=\prod _\alpha M_{d_\alpha }\) whose trace adjoint satisfies the Schwarz inequality. Suppose that, for some \(L{\gt}0\), \(C_L(V_c)=\mathcal A\) and \(F(V_c(X))=V_c(X)\) for every bond matrix \(X\). Then \(F=\operatorname{id}_{\mathcal A}\). No product \(V_c(X_1)\cdots V_c(X_L)\) is assumed to be fixed.
This is the implication used for each transported square composite in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.4, lines 1980–1995 ] .
Fix sectors \((k,l,h)\). On the regrouped sector space, set
Then \(C_{01}^{k,l,h}C_{12}^{k,l,h} =C_{12}^{k,l,h}C_{01}^{k,l,h}\). This is the fixed-sector calculation in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, Proposition C.8, lines 1589–1593 ] .
Suppose that the physical slices in the Hayashi basis satisfy
Let \(\eta _{q,h}=r_q l_h\). For every \(N\geq 1\) and every sector configuration \(k\), the corresponding diagonal block of \(\operatorname{reindex}_{\Phi _N}(M_N(\widetilde{\cal K}))\) is \(\Omega _k\).
Let \(F\) be a linear endomorphism of \(\prod _\alpha M_{d_\alpha }\). Suppose that \(C_L(V_c)\) is the whole sector algebra and, for every choice of bond matrices \(X_1,\ldots ,X_L\),
Then \(F\) is the identity.
If the algebra tower is compatible with an MPO tensor \(M\) and \(E_n^\dagger X = X\) for a positive blocking size \(n\), then \(X \in \mathcal{A}_n\) and, writing \((X_i)_{i \in I_n}\) for its blocked coefficients, \(X = \sum _{i \in I_n} X_i b_i\).
Suppose that the common blocking has been performed, so that the BNT representatives have a simultaneous one-letter span. For the normalized three-site marginal \(\sigma _3^{(4)}\), there are a simultaneous inverse \(C\) and a Hayashi decomposition such that every Markov sector \(k\) with \(p_k\ne 0\) has a unique BNT label \(j_k\). Consequently,
Each \(P_s\) is an orthogonal projection, \(P_sP_t=0\) for \(s\ne t\), and \(\sum _sP_s=P_{\mathrm{act}}\). No independent nonzero-closing-matrix hypothesis is required. This is the four-site specialization of equations QkKjs and Pis in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1714–1737 ] . The Hayashi decomposition uses the forward equality characterization of strong subadditivity recorded in Theorem 21.4.40; no additional analytic assumption is introduced here.
Let \(K\) satisfy the strong area law. If \(\sigma _3^{(4)}(K)\) is obtained from its normalized four-site periodic state by tracing out the fourth site, then \(\sigma _3^{(4)}(K)\) admits a quantum Markov decomposition on its middle site.
Fix four labels \(\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma ,\delta \) in a BNT fusion-isometry family, and write \(A=\{ 1,\ldots ,D_\alpha \} \), \(B=\{ 1,\ldots ,D_\beta \} \), \(C=\{ 1,\ldots ,D_\gamma \} \), and \(D=\{ 1,\ldots ,D_\delta \} \) for their bond-coordinate sets. Let
denote the canonical reassociation. Define
The three-edge and two-edge reassociations from \((((A\times B)\times C)\times D)\) to \(A\times (B\times (C\times D))\) coincide:
If \(P(r)_{x,y}=1\) when \(r(x)=y\) and is zero otherwise, then the corresponding coordinate-permutation matrices satisfy
These are equalities of Cartesian bond-coordinate identifications only; they are distinct from the fusion-multiplicity identity in Theorem 27.3.81.
Suppose that the labelled tensors form a basis of normal tensors and the positive trace-power coefficients are independent of the positive chain length. If each \(P_\gamma \) is a self-adjoint idempotent on the bond space, then \(Q^{\mathrm{fs}}_{\alpha ,\beta }\) is a self-adjoint idempotent and \(\widehat Q^{\mathrm{fs}}_{\alpha ,\beta }\) is an orthogonal projection.
An active-support fusion coisometry family, and hence also a full-support fusion-isometry family, satisfies the same-length product law with the trace-power coefficients of its diagonal matrices. For every chain length \(L\ge 1\),
This derives the product law of [ CPGSV16 , Theorem 4.14(ii) ] from the isometry statement of [ CPGSV16 , Theorem 4.14(iii) ] . The active-support formulation is the one used in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.4, lines 2020–2029 ] .
Suppose that \(\mathcal S[M_2(X)]=M_1(X)\) and \(\mathcal T[M_1(X)]=M_2(X)\) for every virtual operator \(X\). Then, for every \(N\) and \(X\),
In particular, these identities hold for every periodic MPO operator. Hence the two maps supplied by a renormalization fixed point act on rings of every length as required in the proof of [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C, lines 1333–1341 ] .
After the canonical regrouping of all physical-sector indices, the full closures are
Every matrix entry between distinct sector tuples vanishes.
Let \(M\) be in normalized BNT-refined horizontal form and let \(P\) be a matrix for which \(P\widetilde M_vP\) is nonzero for some vertical letter \(v\). Then the first-site compression \(P_1H^{(N+1)}P_1\) is nonzero for some \(N\). This is the separation step used in [ CPGSV16 , Proposition 4.13, line 1898 ] .
The normalized BNT-refined horizontal hypothesis is stronger than the literal CPSV canonical-form hypothesis. The literal separation statement is Theorem 23.4.59; it does not by itself construct the grouped vertical sectors used here.
Consider the grouped vertical decomposition furnished by Theorem 23.4.89. For a phase class \(\alpha \) and a copy \(q\), transport its representative tensor to the bond space of that copy. If \(X_{\alpha ,q}\) is the corresponding gauge, then
for every vertical letter \(v\). This is Figure 8 for the actual witnesses of the grouped decomposition.
In the grouped vertical decomposition of a matrix-product density operator in normalized BNT-refined horizontal form, let \(X_{\alpha ,k}\) be the gauge of a copy of the normal representative \(M_\alpha \). Fix the distinguished gauge to \(X_{\alpha ,1}=\mathbb {1}\). Then there is a positive real number \(\omega _{\alpha ,k}\) such that
and \(U_{\alpha ,k}\) is unitary. This is the normalization in [ CPGSV16 , Proposition 4.13, lines 1903–1921 ] .
Scope restriction (BNT-refined horizontal form): the normalized BNT-refined horizontal hypothesis is stronger than the literal CPSV canonical-form hypothesis.
If every finite-chain operator of an MPO tensor has the explicit sector form of Definition 26.8.1 and a nonzero trace, then the normalized finite-chain states are density operators with that sector form, so the tensor generates Gibbs states of a nearest-neighbor commuting Hamiltonian.
A proposition-level BNT-label theorem witness contains the source-side same-length product law, which holds for every positive length \(L\), and the idempotent scalar law,
A witness also carries the positive-length trace-power law \(c^{(L)}_{\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma } = \operatorname{tr}(\chi _{\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma }^{\, L})\) and positivity of the diagonal \(\chi _{\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma }\)-entries. Substituting the trace-power law into (??) and (??) rewrites them with the coefficients as \(\chi \)-traces,
At every positive length, the BNT-label coefficient family also agrees with the canonical coefficient family determined by these \(\chi \)-matrices. Hence both families are represented by the \(\chi \)-trace formulas (??) and (??). If \(\sigma _n\) and \(\tau _n\) are the source and target label maps for a positive blocked length \(n\), then the blocked-basis coefficients satisfy
- MPOTensor.HasBNTLabelTheoremWitness.exists_source_predicates
- MPOTensor.HasBNTLabelTheoremWitness.exists_positive_length_coeff_eq_ofChi
- MPOTensor.HasBNTLabelTheoremWitness.exists_source_ofChi_predicates
- MPOTensor.HasBNTLabelTheoremWitness.exists_source_ofChi_equations
- MPOTensor.HasBNTLabelTheoremWitness.exists_source_coefficient_equations
- MPOTensor.HasBNTLabelTheoremWitness.exists_source_chi_trace_equations
- MPOTensor.BNTLabelTheoremWitness.coeff_eq_trace_pow
- MPOTensor.BNTLabelTheoremWitness.coeff_eq_ofChi_coeff
- MPOTensor.BNTLabelTheoremWitness.chi_entry_pos
- MPOTensor.BNTLabelTheoremWitness.same_length_product_eq_sum
- MPOTensor.BNTLabelTheoremWitness.idempotent_eq_sum
- MPOTensor.HasBNTLabelTheoremWitness.exists_blocked_coefficient_comparison
- MPOTensor.HasBNTLabelTheoremWitness.exists_blocked_coefficient_comparison_ofChi
- MPOTensor.BNTLabelTheoremWitness.same_length_product_eq_sum_chi_trace_pow
- MPOTensor.BNTLabelTheoremWitness.idempotent_eq_sum_chi_trace
Each \(Q_k\) is an orthogonal projection, distinct summands are mutually orthogonal, and the family resolves the identity:
The first two assertions follow from the orthogonal direct-sum decomposition in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1364–1368 ] ; the resolution of the identity is stated in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1693–1697 ] .
Suppose that \(M_\varepsilon \) is injective. Let \(C\) be a matrix from the right fixed-final-sector space to the left fixed-final-sector space. Under the canonical identifications with \(\mathcal H^{\mathrm L}_{\varepsilon }\otimes \mathbb {C}^{D_\varepsilon }\) and \(\mathcal H^{\mathrm R}_{\varepsilon }\otimes \mathbb {C}^{D_\varepsilon }\), assume that, for every pair of physical indices \(i,j\),
Then there is a rectangular matrix \(F:\mathcal H^{\mathrm R}_{\varepsilon }\to \mathcal H^{\mathrm L}_{\varepsilon }\) such that \(C=F\otimes 1_{D_\varepsilon }\). This conclusion is conditional on the supplied matrix \(C\). It does not assert the existence or invertibility of \(C\) or \(F\), and it does not identify the dimensions of the positive diagonal matrices \(\chi \) with the fusion multiplicities in the printed-\(F\) row/column convention of [ BMW\(^{+}\)17 , Section 3.4 ] .
For an injective simple MPO tensor, contracting \(K^{-1}\) with \(K\) recovers the matrix units on the virtual bond space. Likewise, every right virtual insertion admits a physical realization, this realization is multiplicative, and the analogous left-insertion statement also holds.
Every injective MPO tensor satisfying SAL generates Gibbs states of a nearest-neighbor commuting Hamiltonian: the normalized finite-chain states are density operators with the explicit sector form of Definition 26.8.1, realized through one sector. The one-sector form is the commuting product form in which [ CPGSV16 , Proposition C.8 ] states its conclusion for an injective tensor, combined here with the density normalization of [ CPGSV16 , Definition 4.8 ] .
For all sectors \(k,h\), the neighboring contraction of the resulting physical-sector factorization is the inverse-map operator
This is equation etarl in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1441–1445 ] .
Suppose that \(\mathcal K\) is injective, \(\rho \) is its three-site closure against \(R\), and a Hayashi decomposition of \(\rho \) has been chosen. Write
Then every diagonal sector satisfies
The probability \(p_k\) remains explicit because both sector density operators are normalized. No zero-correlation-length or non-vanishing hypothesis is used in this comparison.
In the setting of Theorem 26.10.2.43, for all \(k\ne k'\), every off-diagonal sector satisfies
Together with the diagonal comparison this gives the direct-sum structure of the factorized tensor: the direct sum over sectors is inherited from the splitting of the middle site.
There is a four-sector, bond-dimension-two tensor with a refined Hayashi decomposition whose four sectors are one-dimensional and have weight \(1/4\). Its three-site state is diagonal, with
The normalized four-site tail is \(LQ\). For this tail, the inverse-map construction recovers the closed sector tensors \(L\) and \(Q\) exactly. Its neighboring operators therefore coincide with those obtained directly from \(L\) and \(Q\), while \(Q(1-LQ)L\ne 0\). The inverse-map construction is the one in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1413–1455 ] .
- MPOTensor.ActiveSectorSpanningCounterexample.normalizedFourSiteTail_tensor
- MPOTensor.ActiveSectorSpanningCounterexample.crossSectorMatrix
- MPOTensor.ActiveSectorSpanningCounterexample.sectorMatrix_eq_crossSectorMatrix
- MPOTensor.ActiveSectorSpanningCounterexample.crossSectorMatrix_mul
- MPOTensor.ActiveSectorSpanningCounterexample.trace_crossSectorMatrix_mul_transfer
- MPOTensor.ActiveSectorSpanningCounterexample.threeSiteState
- MPOTensor.ActiveSectorSpanningCounterexample.hayashiData
- MPOTensor.ActiveSectorSpanningCounterexample.sectorTensorL_hayashiData
- MPOTensor.ActiveSectorSpanningCounterexample.sectorTensorR_hayashiData
- MPOTensor.ActiveSectorSpanningCounterexample.inverseMapFactorization
- MPOTensor.ActiveSectorSpanningCounterexample.inverseMapFactorization_neighboringOperator
- MPOTensor.ActiveSectorSpanningCounterexample.rectangular_remainder_ne_zero
- MPOTensor.ActiveSectorSpanningCounterexample.inverseMap_provenance_preserves_rectangular_remainder
For every middle physical index \(p_2\),
For every final label \(\varepsilon \), the left-associated restriction satisfies the positive-diagonal weighted identity
Site by site,
Let \(M\) generate matrix product density operators, and suppose that its doubled-index MPS tensor is in literal CPSV canonical form. Then there are positive integers \(d_k\), positive scalars \(\nu _k\), normal tensors \(B_k\) of bond dimension \(d_k\), and isometries \(V_k:\mathbb {C}^{d_k}\to \mathbb {C}^d\) with pairwise orthogonal ranges. For every sector \(k\) and every vertical letter \(v\),
Every vertical letter is reconstructed by
The omitted orthogonal complement is an all-zero sector. This is the normal-corner intermediate between the periodic exclusion at lines 1889–1893 and the grouped vertical representation used at line 1898 of [ CPGSV16 , Proposition 4.13 ] .
Let \(\{ K_x\} _{x=0}^{g-1}\) be a nonempty finite family of MPO tensors, let \(n_x\) be positive natural numbers, and let \(P_x\) be pairwise orthogonal one-site projections. Suppose that, for every \(N{\gt}0\),
For \(N\geq 2\) and \(1\leq L\leq N\), write \(\widehat\rho _{x,N,L}\) for the normalized marginal of \(\rho ^{(N)}(K_x)\) on the first \(L\) sites. Assume that the sector label is visible on the first retained site:
If every \(K_x\) satisfies SAL, then \(M\) satisfies SAL.
This is the conditional last inference in the proposition at [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1801–1808 ] . It assumes sectorwise SAL. The printed proposition states the conclusion from the GSNNCH form alone, but its proof invokes the single-sector proposition at lines 1597–1619, whose hypotheses include ZCL. The theorem here does not supply that omitted sectorwise implication.
Let \(\rho _{AB}\) be a bipartite density operator and let \(\Phi _A\) and \(\Psi _B\) be trace-preserving completely positive maps whose input and output matrix algebras may have different dimensions. Then \(I(A':B')_{(\Phi _A\otimes \Psi _B)(\rho )}\leq I(A:B)_\rho \).
Let \(\rho _{AB}\) be a bipartite density operator and let \(\Phi _A\) be a trace-preserving completely positive map whose input and output matrix algebras may have different dimensions. Then \(I(A':B)_{(\Phi _A\otimes \operatorname{id}_B)(\rho )}\leq I(A:B)_\rho \).
Let \(\rho _{AB}\) be a bipartite density operator and let \(\Psi _B\) be a trace-preserving completely positive map whose input and output matrix algebras may have different dimensions. Then \(I(A:B')_{(\operatorname{id}_A\otimes \Psi _B)(\rho )}\leq I(A:B)_\rho \).
In the setting of Theorem 26.10.2.48, for all sectors \(k,h\) and virtual indices \(\beta _1,\alpha _3\), contracting the shared virtual bond of two neighboring factorized slices leaves the neighboring operator between the outer sector tensors:
This is the single-bond step of the identity assembling \(\bigotimes _{n}\eta _{k_n,k_{n+1}}\) from the factorized chain in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1446–1449 ] .
Suppose that \((M_\alpha )_\alpha \) is a basis of normal tensors and that \((c_\alpha )_\alpha \) is any family of nonzero complex scalars. Then there is a positive integer \(L\) such that \(C_L(V_c)=\prod _\alpha M_{d_\alpha }\).
For every pair \((k,h)\), the operators \(\widehat\eta _{k,h}\) and \(\widehat\Omega _{k,h}\) are positive semidefinite.
If \(a_kb_h\ne 0\), then \(\widehat\eta _{k,h}\) and \(\widehat\Omega _{k,h}\) have trace one. Consequently the maps
are trace-preserving and completely positive. These are the individual preparations \(\mathcal S_{k,h}\) and \(\mathcal T_{k,h}\) in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1527–1535 and 1551–1555 ] .
If \(Z_4\ne 0\), there exist virtual indices \(\beta \) and \(\alpha \) such that \((R_4)_{\beta ,\alpha }\ne 0\). These are the indices selected before the sector factorization in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1431–1437 ] .
In the grouped vertical decomposition, put
and identify the bond space of each copy with that of its chosen representative. Then
Writing \(c_{\alpha ,q}=\nu _{\alpha ,q}\zeta _{\alpha ,q}{\gt}0\), the normalized maps satisfy
and retain the literal reconstruction
These are the normalized sector identities in [ CPGSV16 , Proposition 4.13, lines 1895–1921 ] .
Suppose that the doubled-index tensor has the horizontal BNT representation \(S\), the copy weights over each representative agree, the physical-trace transfers \(\mathcal B_j=\sum _iA_j^{ii}\) are not nilpotent, and the original tensor satisfies SAL. After identifying length-three configurations with ordered triples, the normalized three-site marginal of the four-site state is the family closure
where
Every \(\widehat R_j\) is nonzero. More generally, a tail of length \(L\) gives \(\widehat R_j=\operatorname{tr}(\rho ^{(L+3)})^{-1}q_j\mathcal B_j^L\). This is the normalized traced-tail expansion used in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1714–1732 ] .
Let \(A_c^q\in M_{D_c}(\mathbb {C})\) be a finite labelled tensor family. If the one-letter tuples \(q\longmapsto (A_c^q)_c\) span the full product algebra \(\prod _c M_{D_c}(\mathbb {C})\), then there are coefficients \(C_{(c,x,y),q}\) such that
For an MPO tensor the letter is the ket–bra pair \(q=(i,k)\), so the same coefficients form the common block-letter left inverse used in [ BMW\(^{+}\)17 , lines 269–277 ] . The full product-algebra span is obtained after the common blocking described in [ BMW\(^{+}\)17 , lines 427–431 ] .
After identifying one blocked physical index with two original indices, \((K^{[2]})_1(X)=K_2(X)\).
The letters of the two parenthesizations of a triple product are related by the canonical bond reassociation. Equivalently, for every pair of physical indices \(i,k\),
Let \(H\geq 0\) and let \(P=P^\dagger \). If \(PH=PHP\), then \((\mathbb {1}-P)HP=0\). In particular, this conclusion holds for every nonempty-chain density operator generated by an MPDO. This is the operator identity used in the proof of [ CPGSV16 , Proposition 4.13 ] .
Let the active product corners be covered by blocked BNT representatives, let the blocked representatives be identified with the original BNT by the trace-ratio unitary conjugacies, and suppose that the active gauge–phase coefficients are positive. If \(X_j^\dagger X_j=\omega _j\mathbb {1}\) with \(\omega _j{\gt}0\), then every retained copy pair has an original-label corner family. Its coefficient at an active corner is
which is positive. The normalized inclusions are isometries with pairwise orthogonal ranges, intertwine the raw product tensor with these positive multiples of the original BNT representatives, and reconstruct every raw product letter exactly.
Local fix (Figure-11 fixed-pair support): Empty active families remain empty. Exact weighted reconstruction and positivity of the outer copy weight imply that the corresponding raw product vanishes. See docs/paper-gaps/cpsv16_figure11_per_pair_support.tex.
Given an original-label corner family, choose the distinguished retained copy of every BNT label. For fixed labels \(\alpha ,\beta \), let the multiplicity of \(\gamma \) be the number of active corners of the distinguished copy pair whose original label is \(\gamma \), and put the corresponding positive corner coefficients on the diagonal of \(\chi _{\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma }\). The block row of the adjoints of the corner inclusions, regrouped by these label fibers, defines a fusion coisometry. It satisfies
together with the exact reconstruction
Empty label fibers contribute zero-dimensional diagonal blocks. This is the decomposition of CPSV16, Appendix C.4, lines 2020–2029.
Scope restriction (active product BNT): Only active product corners are retained. A label absent from the distinguished copy pair has zero fusion multiplicity. See docs/paper-gaps/cpsv16_bnt_uniqueness_zero_coefficient.tex.
Local fix (Figure-11 fixed-pair support): The distinguished copy pair may have an empty active family; no unsupported corner is inserted. See docs/paper-gaps/cpsv16_figure11_per_pair_support.tex.
Local fix (Figure-11 fusion coisometry): The retained-row map is a coisometry onto the active direct sum. Exact reconstruction includes any common zero corner discarded by the forward map. See docs/paper-gaps/cpsv16_figure11_fusion_coisometry.tex.
Suppose that \(\{ K_x\} _{x=0}^{g-1}\) has an orthogonally supported family of commuting sector products and that, for every \(N\geq 2\),
Then \(M\) has the explicit GSNNCH sector form with outer sectors \(x\) and natural multiplicities \(n_x\).
Suppose that the labelled tensors in the fusion family form a basis of normal tensors and that the positive trace-power coefficients are independent of the positive chain length. Then every pair fusion isometry is surjective: \(U_{\alpha ,\beta }U_{\alpha ,\beta }^{\dagger }=1\). In particular, final-label selectors and coisometry are conclusions, not additional hypotheses. This is a derived consequence of the common BNT word span in [ CPGSV16 , lines 317–345 ] , the fusion identity at lines 986–993, and length independence at lines 995–1010.
Suppose the positive trace-power coefficients are independent of the positive chain length, and suppose that common selectors exist at a positive length. Then every pair fusion isometry is surjective: \(U_{\alpha ,\beta }U_{\alpha ,\beta }^{\dagger }=1\). The common selectors are the finite-word form of the simultaneous inverse used in [ BMW\(^{+}\)17 , line 269 ] .
Let \(M\) be in normalized BNT-refined horizontal form and generate positive semidefinite operators on every nonempty chain. Suppose two vertical corners are positive scalar multiples of similarities of the same tensor \(A\):
Then the two Gram conjugations agree for every vertical letter,
Normality of \(A\) is not required for this equality; it enters only in the subsequent proportionality of the Gram matrices. This is the pairwise conclusion of Figures 7–8 in [ CPGSV16 , Proposition 4.13, lines 1909–1919 ] .
Scope restriction (BNT-refined horizontal form): the normalized BNT-refined horizontal hypothesis is stronger than the literal CPSV canonical-form hypothesis.
Let \(N\geq 3\). For every site \(i\in \mathbb {Z}/N\mathbb {Z}\), including \(i=N-1\), the adjacent translates of the physical bond commute:
This is the periodic-chain form of the adjacent-bond calculation in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, Proposition C.8, lines 1571–1593 ] . The case \(N=2\) is treated separately below, because its two translated bonds have the same support with opposite cyclic order.
Let \(M\) be an MPO tensor of operator bond dimension \(D\), and let \(N=L+K\). Opening the two virtual bonds at the consecutive cut gives
and
For left-block words \(x,x'\) and right-block words \(y,y'\), the factors are
and
This is the identity \(\operatorname{tr}(AB)=\sum _{a,b}A_{ab}B_{ba}\), with the normalization scalar absorbed into the left factor. The algebraic decomposition does not use positivity. Since \(0^{-1}=0\), it also remains valid when the trace vanishes; a nonzero trace is needed only to interpret \(\sigma ^{(N)}_{L:K}\) as the normalized physical state.
This is the two-virtual-boundary algebraic step toward the finite mutual-information estimate in [ CPGSV16 , Proposition 4.5 ] . It does not by itself prove \(I_L\leq 4\log D\): such a conclusion would require an entropy bound in terms of the operator-Schmidt rank.
Let \(N\geq 2\), and suppose that the cyclic bonds beginning at \(i\) and \(j\) have disjoint two-site supports. Then their physical bond operators commute: \((B_{\mathrm{physical}})_{i,i+1} (B_{\mathrm{physical}})_{j,j+1} =(B_{\mathrm{physical}})_{j,j+1} (B_{\mathrm{physical}})_{i,i+1}\). This is the locality part of the pairwise commutation assertion in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, Proposition C.8, lines 1571–1593 ] .
Suppose that the physical-sector factorization is given. For every periodic chain of length \(N\geq 2\) and every pair of sites \(i,j\in \mathbb {Z}/N\mathbb {Z}\), the corresponding translates of the physical bond commute:
This is the pairwise commutation assertion in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, Proposition C.8, lines 1571–1593 ] , conditional here on the physical-sector factorization constructed in the preceding results.
Under the canonical right-associated identification of four-site configurations with quadruples of physical indices,
The two translates of the physical bond on three sites commute:
This is the adjacent-bond calculation in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, Proposition C.8, lines 1589–1593 ] .
Let \(M\) be in normalized BNT-refined horizontal form and satisfy the hypotheses of Theorem 27.3.54. There are non-negative numbers \(\lambda _1,\ldots ,\lambda _d\) and one fixed Hermitian two-site matrix \(\widehat h\), all independent of the chain length. For every \(L\geq 2\), let \(\widehat H_L=\sum _{j=1}^{L}\widehat h_{j,j+1}\). The translates of \(\widehat h\) commute pairwise, and there are orthogonal projections \(\widehat P_1^{(L)},\ldots ,\widehat P_d^{(L)}\) on the physical chain such that
Scope restriction (BNT-refined horizontal form): the normalized BNT-refined horizontal hypothesis is stronger than the literal CPSV canonical-form hypothesis.
Local fix (physical complement): the retained one-site energy is compressed to physical coordinates and extended by zero energy on the orthogonal complement. The retained projectors are transported through the adjoint sitewise coisometry. See docs/paper-gaps/cpsv16_topological_gibbs_physical_complement.tex.
Under the physical-sector factorization \(F\) of the preceding theorem, for every \(N\geq 2\) there is a real number \(c{\gt}0\) such that \(\rho _N=c\, B_0B_1\cdots B_{N-1}\). Here the bonds are the canonical bonds determined by \(F\), and one may take \(c=1\). No positivity hypothesis on the neighboring operators \(\eta _{k,h}\) is required.
Suppose that the physical-sector factorization is given. For every \(N\geq 1\), the physically transformed MPO is block diagonal in the cyclic sector configurations, and
This is the all-length algebraic decomposition in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1435–1450 ] , conditional here on the displayed physical-sector factorization. It does not assert positivity of the individual neighboring operators.
Let \(\mathcal K\) have positive bond dimension and be injective, and let \(F\) be a physical-sector factorization of \(\mathcal K\). Suppose every neighboring operator \(\eta ^F_{q,h}\) is positive semidefinite. If the physical-trace transfer of \(\mathcal K\) has source zero correlation length, then \(\mathcal K\) saturates the area law.
Vertex rephasing transforms the neighboring operators by \(\eta _{k,h}\longmapsto z_k^{-1}z_h\, \eta _{k,h}\). It leaves every sector virtual matrix unchanged, preserves the nonzero neighboring support, and leaves every complete cyclic product of neighboring operators unchanged. These are the rephasing identities used in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1434–1450 ] .
The map \(\mathcal S_1\) is trace-preserving and completely positive.
Assume the neighboring-operator trace factorization of Definition 26.10.3.24. For every virtual matrix \(X\), in the canonical physical-sector coordinates selected by the isometry \(U\), the coarse-graining channel satisfies
The normalized density is positive semidefinite and has trace one on every active pair. The density chosen on an inactive pair is positive definite and has trace one. Hence \(\overline\Omega _{k,h}\) is positive semidefinite with trace one for every pair, and agrees with \(\widehat\Omega _{k,h}\) on active pairs. The corresponding sectorwise and controlled maps prepare these densities on their diagonal summands.
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.normalizedThreeSiteNeighboringDensity_pos
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.trace_normalizedThreeSiteNeighboringDensity
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.inactiveThreeSiteNeighboringDensity_posDef
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.inactiveThreeSiteNeighboringDensity_trace
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.completedThreeSiteNeighboringDensity_pos
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.trace_completedThreeSiteNeighboringDensity
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.completedThreeSiteNeighboringDensity_eq_normalized
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.completedThreeSitePreparationMap_eq_normalized
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.completedThreeSiteControlledMap_sameBlock_apply
Each completed preparation is trace-preserving and completely positive. The same holds for their orthogonally controlled direct sum.
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.completedThreeSitePreparationMap_isKrausCPTP
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.completedThreeSiteControlledMap_isKrausCPTP
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.t1Map_isKrausCPTP
Assume the neighboring-operator trace factorization of Definition 26.10.3.24. For every virtual matrix \(X\), in the canonical physical-sector coordinates selected by the isometry \(U\), the refinement channel satisfies
This is the refinement half of Proposition C.7 [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1510–1516 and 1522–1545 ] .
The sector set and every middle-subspin space are nonempty. Each \(\Omega _{k,h}\) is positive semidefinite, and \(a_kb_h=0\) implies \(\Omega _{k,h}=0\).
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.sector_nonempty
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.threeSiteMiddleIndex_nonempty
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.threeSiteNeighboringOperator_pos
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.threeSiteNeighboringOperator_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero
Assume the neighboring-operator trace factorization of Definition 26.10.3.24. Then, for every outer-sector pair \((k,h)\),
This is the normalization used in the coarse-graining channel of [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2 ] , lines 1547–1555.
Let \(K=V K_P V^*\) be a physical support restriction of an MPO tensor satisfying SAL. Proposition C.8 applied to the injective tensor \(K_P\) gives a positive two-site bond \(B_P\) whose cyclic translates commute pairwise on every periodic chain of length \(N\geq 2\). Its lift \(B=V^{\otimes 2}B_P(V^{\otimes 2})^*\) is positive, its cyclic translates commute pairwise on every such ambient chain, and \((P\otimes P)B(P\otimes P)=B\). Moreover, for every \(N\geq 2\) one has the exact identity
Suppose that \(\eta _{k,h}\) is positive semidefinite for every pair of sectors. Then \(B_{\mathrm{physical}}\) is positive semidefinite, both with pair indices and with two-site configuration indices.
On the periodic chain of length two, the translates beginning at sites zero and one read the physical sites in the opposite cyclic orders \((0,1)\) and \((1,0)\). Nevertheless they commute: \(B_{01}B_{10}=B_{10}B_{01}\). This is the length-two instance of the translated-bond commutativity in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, Proposition C.8 ] . The source does not discuss the crossed finite-size ordering separately.
Let \(L{\gt}0\). Pairing the ket and bra letters site by site gives the canonical identification \(\{ 0,\ldots ,d^L-1\} ^2\simeq \{ 0,\ldots ,d^2-1\} ^L\). Under this identification, the doubled-index MPS tensor of \(M^{[L]}\) is the physical reindexing of the \(L\)-blocked doubled-index MPS tensor of \(M\). In particular, one is injective if and only if the other is.
Suppose that every neighboring operator \(\eta _{k,h}\) is positive semidefinite. Then the physical bond is positive semidefinite and all of its cyclic translates commute on every periodic chain of length at least two. Thus it determines a single translation-invariant positive bond datum. This assertion does not include the product formula for the finite-chain density operator.
Let \(M\) be an MPO tensor of physical dimension \(d\) and bond dimension \(D\). Let \(A\) be a CPSV normal tensor of positive bond dimension \(n\) and physical dimension \(D^2\), let \(V\in \mathbb {C}^{d\times n}\) be an isometry, let \(X\in \mathbb {C}^{n\times n}\) be invertible, and let \(\omega \) be nonzero. Suppose that, for every vertical letter \(v\),
Then the range projector \(VV^\dagger \) has a nonzero vertical corner:
for some \(v\). This is the algebraic nonvanishing step used in [ CPGSV16 , Proposition 4.13, line 1898 ] .
Let \(u=(i_1,i_2,i_3)\) and \(v=(j_1,j_2,j_3)\) be physical words of length three. The corresponding entry of the first-three-site marginal of the normalized four-site periodic operator is
Let \(M\) generate positive semidefinite operators on every nonempty chain, let \(A\) be a vertical tensor, and suppose that a matrix \(V\) selects the vertical corner \(V^\dagger \widetilde M_vV=cA^v\), where \(c{\gt}0\). For vertical indices \(r,s\), write \((\mathcal{R}(A)^{rs})_{ab}=(A^{(a,b)})_{rs}\), and set \((A^\sharp )^v=(A^{v^{\mathrm{op}}})^\dagger \). Then, for every pair of equal-length tail words \(\sigma ,\tau \),
Thus the adjoint exchanges the oriented horizontal bond pair and reverses the unmarked tail. In particular, this is not a same-tail identity and does not identify \(A\) with \(A^\sharp \) letterwise.
Enumerate the dependent family of active corners by a single finite label set. The resulting coefficients are positive, the blocks are normal, and the inclusion ranges are pairwise orthogonal. For every tensor letter,
Each compression \(W_j^\dagger C^iW_j\) is \(\lambda _jA_j^i\), and \(C\) has the same positive-length closed chains as the finite direct sum \(\bigoplus _j\lambda _jA_j\).
- MPOTensor.retainedVerticalProductTensor_eq_sum_pairBlocks
- MPOTensor.retainedProductBlockInclusion_orthogonal_of_ne
- MPOTensor.RetainedProductSpectralFamily.retainedInclusion_orthogonal_of_ne
- MPOTensor.RetainedProductSpectralFamily.retained_compression
- MPOTensor.RetainedProductSpectralFamily.retained_reconstruction_active
- MPOTensor.RetainedProductSpectralFamily.flatDim
- MPOTensor.RetainedProductSpectralFamily.flatCoefficient
- MPOTensor.RetainedProductSpectralFamily.flatBlock
- MPOTensor.RetainedProductSpectralFamily.flatInclusion
- MPOTensor.RetainedProductSpectralFamily.flatDim_pos
- MPOTensor.RetainedProductSpectralFamily.flatCoefficient_pos
- MPOTensor.RetainedProductSpectralFamily.flatCoefficient_ne
- MPOTensor.RetainedProductSpectralFamily.flatBlock_normal
- MPOTensor.RetainedProductSpectralFamily.flatInclusion_isometry
- MPOTensor.RetainedProductSpectralFamily.flatInclusion_orthogonal_of_ne
- MPOTensor.RetainedProductSpectralFamily.flat_intertwine
- MPOTensor.RetainedProductSpectralFamily.flat_intertwine_adjoint
- MPOTensor.RetainedProductSpectralFamily.flat_compression
- MPOTensor.RetainedProductSpectralFamily.flat_reconstruction
- MPOTensor.RetainedProductSpectralFamily.flat_sameMPV₂Pos
Suppose that the one-site vertical tensor has the stated exact coisometric reconstruction, that \(M\) is in normalized BNT-refined horizontal form, and that \(M\) generates positive operators. Then simultaneous retained-product spectral data exist. In copy coordinates, the assembled vertical tensor is the direct sum of the weighted simple blocks. The canonical inclusion of each copy is an isometry, intertwines in both directions, and its compression selects exactly that weighted block. Likewise, the canonical inclusion of a copy pair, followed by its local corner isometry, is an isometry into the retained product bond space and intertwines in both directions. Composing once more with the adjoint of the squared vertical coisometry gives an isometry into the bond space of the blocked vertical tensor. Under the exact coisometric reconstruction, these ambient inclusions intertwine each active weighted corner with the blocked vertical tensor in both directions. In particular, if \(J_j\) is the ambient inclusion of an active corner, then \(J_j^\dagger \mathcal V(M^{(2)})^iJ_j=\lambda _jA_j^i\). These explicit composite inclusions retain the range projections required for the sector-weight comparison.
- MPOTensor.verticalCopyCoordinateEquiv
- MPOTensor.verticalCopyCoordinateEquiv_symm_apply
- MPOTensor.verticalAssembledTensor_reindex_copyCoordinates
- MPOTensor.verticalCopyBlockInclusion
- MPOTensor.verticalCopyBlockInclusion_isometry
- MPOTensor.verticalAssembledTensor_mul_verticalCopyBlockInclusion
- MPOTensor.verticalCopyBlockInclusion_conjTranspose_mul_verticalAssembledTensor
- MPOTensor.verticalCopyBlockInclusion_compression
- MPOTensor.retainedProductBlockInclusion_isometry
- MPOTensor.retainedVerticalProductTensor_mul_retainedProductBlockInclusion
- MPOTensor.retainedProductBlockInclusion_conjTranspose_mul_retainedVerticalProductTensor
- MPOTensor.exists_retainedProductSpectralFamily
- MPOTensor.RetainedProductSpectralFamily.retainedInclusion
- MPOTensor.RetainedProductSpectralFamily.ambientInclusion
- MPOTensor.RetainedProductSpectralFamily.retainedInclusion_isometry
- MPOTensor.RetainedProductSpectralFamily.retained_intertwine
- MPOTensor.RetainedProductSpectralFamily.retained_intertwine_adjoint
- MPOTensor.RetainedProductSpectralFamily.ambientInclusion_isometry
- MPOTensor.RetainedProductSpectralFamily.ambient_intertwine
- MPOTensor.RetainedProductSpectralFamily.ambient_intertwine_adjoint
- MPOTensor.RetainedProductSpectralFamily.ambient_compression
Suppose that the vertical reading of \(M\) is reconstructed from a retained tensor \(A\) by a coisometry \(U\). The two-site blocking is then reconstructed from the product of two copies of \(A\) by the Kronecker square of \(U\). Moreover, if \(M\) is in normalized BNT-refined horizontal form and generates positive operators, this retained product tensor has invariant-projector closure and has no nontrivial periodic vectors. No full-support assumption is imposed on the retained bond space.
- MPOTensor.verticalCoisometrySquare
- MPOTensor.verticalCoisometrySquare_isCoisometry
- MPOTensor.verticalTensor_blockTwo_squared_coisometry_reconstruction
- MPSTensor.projectorClosure_and_noPeriodicVectors_of_coisometry_reconstruction
- MPOTensor.retainedVerticalProduct_projectorClosure_and_noPeriodicVectors
Let \(M\) be a matrix product density operator in normalized BNT-refined horizontal form which satisfies the local renormalization fixed-point equations of Definition 4.1. This horizontal hypothesis is stronger than literal CPSV canonical form. Then \(M\) saturates the area law: \(I_L(M)=I_{L+1}(M)\) whenever \(1\leq L{\lt}\lfloor N/2\rfloor \). This is the normalized BNT-refined specialization of the forward implication of Proposition propsimple in Appendix C of [ CPGSV16 ] . Simplicity is among the ambient hypotheses of Theorem 4.9 but is not used in this implication.
Let \(M\) be a matrix product density operator in normalized BNT-refined horizontal form which satisfies the local renormalization fixed-point equations of Definition 4.1. This horizontal hypothesis is stronger than literal CPSV canonical form. Then \(M\) has source zero correlation length and saturates the area law. This is the normalized-BNT-refined specialization of Proposition propsimple in Appendix C of [ CPGSV16 ] , lines 1333–1341.
A one-site fusion-isometry datum implies transfer-map idempotence. Hence the fusion-isometry formulation, which supplies such data at every positive blocked size, implies the same condition.
Let \(M\) be a renormalization fixed point. If its \(N\)-site operator is positive semidefinite and has nonzero trace, then \(I(\sigma ^{(N)}_{a+1:b+2}) =I(\sigma ^{(N)}_{a+2:b+1})\). This is the channel calculation in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C, lines 1333–1341 ] . For the forward implication proved here, the required nonzero trace follows from normalized BNT-refined horizontal form, the MPDO condition, and the renormalization maps; simplicity is not used. This horizontal hypothesis is stronger than literal CPSV canonical form.
Let \(M\) be a matrix product density operator in normalized BNT-refined horizontal form. If the one-site and two-site physical closures are related in both directions by trace-preserving completely positive maps as in Definition 4.1, then a vertical canonical decomposition of \(M\) has the active-sector fusion clause above. In particular, its positive diagonal fusion matrices satisfy the length-one idempotent trace-scalar identity.
Assume the doubled tensor is trace-preserving and the transfer map admits a positive-definite fixed point. If the transfer-map fusion criterion holds, then the MPO satisfies the algebra-structure formulation of the renormalization fixed-point condition.
Assume the doubled tensor is trace-preserving and the transfer map admits a positive-definite fixed point. If \(E_1^2 = E_1\), then there is a stationary family of support algebras
with multiplication \(m_n(x,y) = xy\) and inclusion \(\iota _n(x) = x\).
For every final label \(\varepsilon \), the right-associated restriction satisfies the positive-diagonal weighted identity
Site by site,
The map \(\mathcal S_0\) is trace-preserving and completely positive.
The shift \(\mathcal S_2\) is trace-preserving and completely positive.
Let \(K\) be a simple tensor in block-injective canonical form which satisfies ZCL and SAL. For the representatives \(\mathcal K_i\) of its BNT, there are orthogonal projectors \(P_s\) such that
This is the separating-projector lemma in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1626–1691 ] .
Let \(K\) be simple, in biCF, and satisfy SAL. Assume in addition that the common blocking has been performed, the copy weights over each BNT representative agree, and the representatives have a simultaneous one-site span. There is a distinguished BNT label \(s_0\) such that the completed projectors are orthogonal and, for distinct labels \(s\) and \(t\),
For every physical slice of the \(i\)-th BNT representative, whenever \(s\ne t\) or \(i\ne s\),
This is the copy-independent-weight specialization of the separating-projector lemma in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1680–1737 ] .
- MPOTensor.completedBntSectorProjection_isOrthogonal
- MPOTensor.completedBntSectorProjection_mul_eq_zero
- MPOTensor.sum_completedBntSectorProjection
- MPOTensor.completedBntSectorProjection_mul_physicalSlice_mul_eq_zero
- MPOTensor.exists_bntSeparatingProjectors_of_sameMPV₂Pos_isSAL_of_weight_copy_independent
Let \(1\leq m\leq \lfloor N/2\rfloor \), and divide the chain into four consecutive regions \(A,B,C,D\) of lengths \(m-1,1,N-m-1,1\). If the tensor saturates the area law, then its marginal on \(ABC\) satisfies \(S(ABC)+S(B)=S(AB)+S(BC)\). Indeed, this is the entropy form of \(I_1=I_m\). Taking \(m=2\) gives the regions of lengths \(1,1,N-3\), and then taking \(N=4\) shows that the three-site reduced state of the four-site chain satisfies equality in strong subadditivity.
Conversely, suppose the tensor generates positive semidefinite periodic operators and their traces are nonzero at every positive chain length. If the displayed equality holds for every \(N\) and every \(1\leq m\leq \lfloor N/2\rfloor \), then the tensor saturates the area law. This is the choice of regions used in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1760–1780 ] . The endpoint corrects the strict inequality printed at source line 1771: Definition 4.6 and the concluding comparison both require \(m=\lfloor N/2\rfloor \). This local correction is recorded in docs/paper-gaps/cpgsv17_mpdo_sal_zcl_eta_local_structure.tex.
Let \(K\) satisfy the strong area law and let \(N\geq 4\). If \(\sigma _3^{(N)}(K)\) is obtained from the normalized \(N\)-site periodic state by tracing out all but its first three sites, then \(\sigma _3^{(N)}(K)\) admits a quantum Markov decomposition on its middle site. This is the three-site marginal result proved in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1351–1371 ] . The decomposition may depend on \(N\).
Let \(K\) be a simple tensor in block-injective canonical form (biCF), equipped with a basis-of-normal-tensors decomposition and satisfying the strong area law and zero correlation length. Let \(M=K^{[2]}\) be its two-site blocking. Then there are trace-preserving completely positive maps in both directions between the one-site and two-site closures of \(M\). Equivalently, \(M\) is a renormalization fixed point via these two maps. This is implication (ii)\(\Rightarrow \)(v) of [ CPGSV16 , Theorem 4.9 and Appendix C.2, lines 1810–1825 ] . The separate standing biCF and BNT hypotheses are imposed at lines 849–850 and restated at line 1628 of the same source. The printed proof of implication (ii)\(\Rightarrow \)(v) refers back to the construction of Proposition C.7 after projection to each local sector. That construction requires the rank-one neighboring-trace factorization supplied in the printed argument by the refuted Lemma C.5. No proof under SAL and ZCL alone is presently known.
Let \(K\) be a simple tensor in block-injective canonical form (biCF), equipped with a basis-of-normal-tensors decomposition. If \(K\) satisfies the strong area law and zero correlation length, then its basis tensors have mutually orthogonal physical supports. Moreover, each basis tensor has an inverse-map sector decomposition with positive neighboring operators \(\eta _{k,h}\) and real families \((a_k)_k,(b_k)_k\) satisfying
This is implication (ii)\(\Rightarrow \)(iv) of [ CPGSV16 , Theorem 4.9 and Appendix C.2, lines 1740–1788 ] . The separate standing biCF and BNT hypotheses are imposed at lines 849–850 and restated at line 1628 of the same source. The proof at lines 1745–1785 applies the structural corollary after establishing SAL and ZCL for each basis tensor. Since that corollary uses the refuted Lemma C.5, the printed proof does not establish this proposition.
There is an injective matrix product density operator tensor satisfying the strong area law and source zero correlation length whose source-selected inverse-map factorization has positive semidefinite neighboring operators and a primitive trace-one active trace matrix \(T\), but for which there are no families \(a,b\) satisfying \(T_{k,h}=a_kb_h\) for all \(k,h\). Equivalently, for the corresponding closed sector tensors \(L,Q\), one has \(Q(1-LQ)L=T-T^2\ne 0\). Thus the rank-one conclusion in Lemma C.5 is false under its printed hypotheses.
- MPOTensor.ActiveSectorSpanningCounterexample.tensor_isSAL
- MPOTensor.ActiveSectorSpanningCounterexample.activeSectorTraceMatrix_not_rankOne
- MPOTensor.ActiveSectorSpanningCounterexample.tensor_refutes_printed_sal_zcl_rank_one_inference
- MPOTensor.ActiveSectorSpanningCounterexample.rectangular_remainder_eq_mul_sub_sq
Under the same sector factorization hypothesis, for every \(N\geq 1\),
This is the algebraic sector decomposition in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1446–1450 ] . It does not assert that the individual neighboring operators are positive.
For every virtual matrix \(X\),
Similarly,
and summing the scalar coefficient over \(l\) gives \(a_kb_h\).
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.partialTraceRight_twoSiteSectorClosure
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.partialTraceRight_twoSiteSectorClosure
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.partialTraceRight_threeSiteSectorClosure
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.sum_threeSite_trace_coefficients
Let \(H^{(N)}\), \(N\geq 1\), be a density operator generated by an MPDO and let \(P=P^\dagger \). Then \(PH^{(N)}P\ge 0\), and if \(PH^{(N)}P\ne 0\) its trace is a positive real. In particular this holds for the first-site compressions \(P_1H^{(N+1)}P_1\). Applied to the sector projectors \(P_{\alpha ,k}\) of the vertical decomposition, this is the positivity \(\operatorname{tr}(P_{\alpha ,k}H^{(N)}P_{\alpha ,k}){\gt}0\) from which the proof of [ CPGSV16 , Proposition 4.13 ] concludes \(\mu _{\alpha ,k}d_\alpha {\gt}0\); the identification of the trace with \(\mu _{\alpha ,k}d_\alpha \) is Theorem 23.4.62.
Under the hypotheses of Definition 26.10.6.1, the trace matrix of the explicit \(\eta \)-data is the pairing of the closed sector tensors:
Let \({\cal K}\) be an injective MPDO with the chosen Hayashi decomposition and a nonzero tail entry. Then for all sectors \(k,h\):
\(\eta _{k,k}\ge 0\);
\(\eta _{k,h}\otimes \eta _{h,k}\ge 0\);
if \(\eta _{k,h}\ne 0\) and \(\eta _{h,k}\ne 0\), there is a scalar \(c\ne 0\) with \(c\, \eta _{k,h}\ge 0\), \(c^{-1}\eta _{h,k}\ge 0\), and \((c\, \eta _{k,h})\otimes (c^{-1}\eta _{h,k})=\eta _{k,h}\otimes \eta _{h,k}\).
Suppose that \(\mathcal K\) is injective, \(\rho \) is its three-site closure against \(R\), a Hayashi decomposition of \(\rho \) has been chosen, and the outer indices satisfy \(R_{\beta _3,\alpha _1}\ne 0\). Then for all virtual indices \(\beta _1,\alpha _3\),
The direct sum refers to the physical indices and is inherited from the splitting of the middle site. This is the factorization displayed at [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1435–1448 ] .
For sector tensors paired into \(T\) as in Definition 26.10.6.33, the operator \(M=\sum _k|l_k)(r_k|\) satisfies \(M^2=M\). If in addition the vectors \(|l_0),\ldots ,|l_{n-1})\) are linearly independent, then \(T^2=T\).
For sector tensors paired into \(T\) as in Definition 26.10.6.33, without any independence hypothesis on the closed sector tensors or the functionals, one has \(T^2=T^3\), and, for every positive integer \(N\), \(\operatorname{tr}(T^N)=\operatorname{tr}(T)\).
For a physical-sector factorization, let \(A_{k;x,y}\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be the virtual matrix obtained from the physical matrix entry \((x,y)\) within sector \(k\). Suppose that all such matrices span \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) and that both endpoint sectors of every nonzero neighboring operator contain a nonzero matrix of this form. Then every nonzero \(\eta _{k,h}\) admits a two-edge return: there is a sector \(j\) for which
In particular, the nonzero neighboring support is recurrent.
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.sectorVirtualMatrix_mul_apply
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.sectorVirtualMatrix_mul_eq_zero_of_neighboringOperator_eq_zero
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.exists_two_edge_return_of_neighboringOperator_ne_zero_of_endpoints
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.exists_two_edge_return_of_neighboringOperator_ne_zero
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.neighboringOperator_reaches_of_ne_zero
Suppose the sector trace matrix \(T\) of Definition 26.10.6.33 is primitive. Then every closed sector tensor satisfies \(|l_k)\neq 0\). If, in addition, each \(|l_k)\) lies in its own member of an independent family of subspaces of \(V\), then the vectors \(|l_0),\ldots ,|l_{n-1})\) are linearly independent.
Let \(P\) be a sector projector for the weight \(\mu \) and the matrix \(E_\alpha \). Then for every chain length \(N+1\),
Once spectral normalization and grouping identify the reducing projectors with sector projectors \(P_{\alpha ,k}\) satisfying Definition 23.4.58, this specializes to the trace identification \(\operatorname{tr}(P_{\alpha ,k}H^{(N)}P_{\alpha ,k})=\mu _{\alpha ,k}d_\alpha \) used in the proof of [ CPGSV16 , Proposition 4.13 ] ; the source states it at the particular length where the compression does not vanish.
Let \({\cal K}\) be an injective tensor that generates MPDOs and satisfies SAL, and choose the positive semidefinite neighboring operators of Theorem 26.10.4.41. Restrict the sector index to the positive-weight summands of the Hayashi decomposition. Then positive semidefiniteness makes every neighboring trace real and non-negative, and the matrix
is primitive. Zero-weight summands remain in the physical direct sum but are not indices of \(T^*\).
Let \({\cal K}\) be injective and let
be a physical-sector factorization. Then the virtual matrices \(A_{k;x,y}\) obtained from all within-sector physical entries span the full virtual matrix algebra \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\).
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.changePhysicalBasis_inverse_apply_eq_sum
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.sectorCoordinateMatrixFamily_span_eq_top
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.sectorCoordinateTensor_mem_span_sectorVirtualMatrixFamily
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.sectorVirtualMatrixFamily_span_eq_top
Let \(M\) generate an MPDO, let \(Q\) and \(P\) be sector projectors for the weights \(\mu _{\alpha ,1}\) and \(\mu _{\alpha ,k}\) and a common matrix \(E_\alpha \), and suppose \(\mu _{\alpha ,1}{\gt}0\). If the compression of \(H^{(N+1)}\) by \(P\) at the first site is nonzero, then
Granted such sector projectors, this yields the conclusion of the trace argument in the proof of [ CPGSV16 , Proposition 4.13 ] : since w.l.o.g. \(\mu _{\alpha ,1}{\gt}0\), the positive trace forces \(d_\alpha {\gt}0\) and hence \(\mu _{\alpha ,k}{\gt}0\).
Under the hypotheses of the preceding theorem, define \(M_n(a,b)=L_n(a)R_n(b)\). Then
Let a tensor with zero correlation length be gauge-equivalent, through block-diagonal copy gauges, to an assembled sector decomposition whose basis elements all have non-nilpotent physical-trace transfer. Then the weights do not depend on the copy index: \(\mu _{j,q}=\mu _{j}\) [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1646–1661 ] .
Let \(H\) and \(K\) be finite-dimensional complex vector spaces, and let \(V:H\to K\) satisfy \(V^\dagger V=I_H\). Then the map
is trace-preserving and completely positive. This is the general one-isometry form of the local basis change used in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1439 and 1520 ] .
Let \(M\) have source zero correlation length. For every \(L\geq 0\), the normalized \(L\)-site marginal obtained by tracing three sites from \(\sigma ^{(L+3)}(M)\) equals the normalized \(L\)-site marginal obtained by tracing one site from \(\sigma ^{(L+1)}(M)\).
Let \(M\) generate matrix product density operators and have source zero correlation length. Then, for every \(N\geq 1\), \(\operatorname{tr}(\sigma ^{(N)}(M)){\gt}0\). In particular, after a common blocking has made the simultaneous BNT word span full at one letter, the absorbed BNT elements selected in Theorem 26.10.2.29 have a well-defined normalized state at every physical chain length. This is the biCF hypothesis imposed at the start of Case II in the source; its relation with finite physical blocking is recorded in docs/paper-gaps/cpgsv17_bicf_block_separation.tex. This supplies the strict form of the sector normalization used in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1760–1780 ] .
Under the trace-preserving normalization and a positive-definite fixed point, if \(M\) satisfies the algebra-structure formulation, then the stationary tower \(\mathcal{A}_n = \operatorname{Fix}(E_1^\dagger )\) is itself compatible with \(M\): for every positive blocking size \(n\), \(\operatorname{Fix}(E_1^\dagger )=\operatorname{Fix}(E_n^\dagger )\).
The map \(\mathcal T_0\) is trace-preserving and completely positive.
For every two-site matrix \(Y\), outer-sector pair \((k,h)\), and boundary indices \(a,b\),
The shift \(\mathcal T_2\) is trace-preserving and completely positive.
Let \(\mathcal S:\operatorname{End}_{\mathbb {C}}(H)\to \operatorname{End}_{\mathbb {C}}(K)\) be trace-preserving and completely positive, and let \(R\) be another finite-dimensional space. Then
are trace-preserving and completely positive.
Let \(M\) be a matrix product density operator in normalized BNT-refined horizontal form satisfying the renormalization fixed-point condition. Fix internally the fusion clause supplied by that construction, and suppose that its positive trace-power coefficients are independent of the positive chain length. Then \(K_\gamma \) is positive semidefinite for every terminal label, so \(\lambda _s\geq 0\). Write the total positive chain length as \(N=n+1\), where \(n\in \mathbb {N}\) is its predecessor. For every \(N{\gt}0\),
For distinct spectral indices \(s\) and \(t\),
The recursive factor and multiplicity weights satisfy
Consequently,
The length-independence assumption here is clause-relative: it is stated on the coefficients of the fixed clause selected from the renormalization fixed-point construction, not on an arbitrary fusion clause.
Scope restriction (BNT-refined horizontal form): the normalized BNT-refined horizontal hypothesis is stronger than the literal CPSV canonical-form hypothesis.
This theorem stops at [ CPGSV16 , lines 1003–1012 ] ; it does not assert the commuting nearest-neighbor Hamiltonian or Gibbs-state conclusion beginning at line 1013.
- MPOTensor.BNTFusionTensorClause.terminalEigenvalue_nonneg
- MPOTensor.BNTFusionTensorClause.topologicalSpectralProjectorSucc_isOrthogonalProjection
- MPOTensor.BNTFusionTensorClause.topologicalSpectralProjectorSucc_mul_eq_zero
- MPOTensor.BNTFusionTensorClause.sum_terminalEigenvalue_smul_topologicalSpectralProjectorSucc
- MPOTensor.BNTFusionTensorClause.topologicalMultiplicityWeightFactorSucc_commutes_spectralProjector
- MPOTensor.BNTFusionTensorClause.topologicalDensityOperatorSucc_eq_sum_terminalSpectralProjector
- MPOTensor.BNTFusionTensorClause.hasTerminalSpectralProjectorRefinement
- MPOTensor.terminalSpectralProjectorRefinement_of_isRFPViaTS
Let \(M\) be a matrix product density operator, and choose a vertical canonical decomposition with basis tensors \(M_\gamma \) and positive diagonal multiplicity matrices \(\mu _\gamma \). Then every terminal transfer matrix \(T_\gamma =\operatorname{tr}(M_\gamma )\) is positive semidefinite. This supplies the positivity needed for the spectral decomposition invoked in [ CPGSV16 , lines 1010–1016 ] ; it asserts neither that \(T_\gamma \) is a projection nor the subsequent spectral, Hamiltonian, or Gibbs decomposition.
Local fix (terminal trace orientation): The trace closes the horizontal operator leg and leaves the two bond indices of \(M_\gamma \) open. See docs/paper-gaps/cpsv16_topological_projector_recursion.tex.
Under the canonical identification of three-site configurations with \(H\otimes (H\otimes H)\), the translates of the physical bond beginning at sites \(0\) and \(1\) are respectively \((B_{\mathrm{physical}})_{01}=B_{01}\) and \((B_{\mathrm{physical}})_{12}=B_{12}\).
Let \(M\) be a matrix product density operator in normalized BNT-refined horizontal form and suppose that it satisfies the renormalization fixed-point condition. There is one vertical canonical decomposition and one compatible family of fusion coisometries such that, for every \(N{\gt}0\), the rectangular vertical coisometry \(V\) satisfies the two exact equations
No additional compatibility hypothesis is imposed. The statement is restricted to positive lengths and does not assert the commutator at line 1001, length independence, or the subsequent spectral and Gibbs decomposition.
Scope restriction (BNT-refined horizontal form): the normalized BNT-refined horizontal hypothesis is stronger than the literal CPSV canonical-form hypothesis.
Local fix (rectangular vertical map): The second equality uses exact reconstruction from the retained nonzero sectors of Proposition 4.13 and Appendix C.4, lines 2020–2029, not a square-unitary identity. See docs/paper-gaps/cpgsv17_vertical_isometry_zero_sector.tex.
- MPOTensor.BNTFusionTensorClause.singleKrausMap_verticalCoisometry_mpo_eq_topologicalDensityOperatorSucc
- MPOTensor.BNTFusionTensorClause.singleKrausMap_conjTranspose_verticalCoisometry_topologicalDensityOperatorSucc_eq_mpo
- MPOTensor.BNTFusionTensorClause.HasTopologicalDensityDecomposition
- MPOTensor.BNTFusionTensorClause.hasTopologicalDensityDecomposition
- MPOTensor.exists_topologicalDensityDecomposition_of_isRFPViaTS
Let \(M\) be a matrix product density operator in normalized BNT-refined horizontal form satisfying the renormalization fixed-point condition. Select the fusion clause supplied by that condition and suppose that its positive trace-power coefficients are independent of the positive chain length. There are non-negative numbers \(\lambda _1,\ldots ,\lambda _d\), independent of the chain length. For every \(L\geq 2\), the same two-site matrix \(h\) is Hermitian, its periodic translates commute pairwise, and
There are orthogonal projections \(P_1^{(L)},\ldots ,P_d^{(L)}\) such that
Applying the adjoint retained-row map at every site reconstructs \(\rho ^{(L)}(M)\) from the right-hand side of (??).
Scope restriction (BNT-refined horizontal form): the normalized BNT-refined horizontal hypothesis is stronger than the literal CPSV canonical-form hypothesis.
Scope restriction (retained vertical coordinates): the formula is an equality for \(R_L\) on the retained vertical space, not the literal physical-space equality asserted in [ CPGSV16 , lines 1013–1016 ] . Exact reconstruction by the adjoint retained-row map is weaker than the existence of physical projectors and a finite physical Hamiltonian. See docs/paper-gaps/cpsv16_topological_gibbs_physical_complement.tex.
Scope restriction (positive chains of length at least two): the conclusion is proved for \(L=N+2\). Definition 4.8 of [ CPGSV16 ] defines \(h\) on two spins but does not state a length-one convention; see docs/paper-gaps/cpsv16_topological_gibbs_length_one.tex.
- MPOTensor.BNTFusionTensorClause.topologicalGibbsLocalTerm_isHermitian
- MPOTensor.BNTFusionTensorClause.topologicalGibbsBondSuccSucc_commute
- MPOTensor.BNTFusionTensorClause.exp_neg_topologicalGibbsHamiltonianSuccSucc
- MPOTensor.BNTFusionTensorClause.physicalIndexedTopologicalSpectralProjectorSucc_isOrthogonalProjection
- MPOTensor.BNTFusionTensorClause.physicalIndexedTopologicalSpectralProjectorSucc_commutes_gibbsFactor
- MPOTensor.BNTFusionTensorClause.topologicalDensityOperatorSucc_eq_sum_physicalIndexedProjector_mul_gibbsFactor
- MPOTensor.BNTFusionTensorClause.singleKrausMap_physicalIndexedGibbsDecomposition_eq_mpo
- MPOTensor.BNTFusionTensorClause.hasTopologicalGibbsDecomposition
- MPOTensor.topologicalGibbsDecomposition_of_isRFPViaTS
Let \(P_\gamma \) be self-adjoint idempotents on the terminal bond space of \(M_\gamma \). Suppose that the matrices \(\chi _{\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma }\) have the positive-length trace-power form of the label-coefficient family and that this family is independent of the positive chain length. Then
is self-adjoint and idempotent. This is the single recursive fusion step in [ CPGSV16 , lines 999–1010 ] . Since the active fusion map satisfies \(U_{\alpha ,\beta }U_{\alpha ,\beta }^{\dagger }=I\), the transported operator \(U_{\alpha ,\beta }^{\dagger }Q_{\alpha ,\beta }U_{\alpha ,\beta }\) is also an orthogonal projection on the product bond space.
- MPOTensor.BNTFusionCoisometryFamily.projectorQBlock_eq_unweighted
- MPOTensor.BNTFusionCoisometryFamily.projectorQBlock_isStarProjection
- MPOTensor.BNTFusionCoisometryFamily.conjugatedProjectorQBlock_isOrthogonalProjection
- MPOTensor.BNTFusionTensorClause.projectorQBlock_isStarProjection
- MPOTensor.BNTFusionTensorClause.conjugatedProjectorQBlock_isOrthogonalProjection
For every initial label and every finite list of appended labels, let \(N\geq 1\) be one plus the length of that list. The sequential fusion map \(W_N\) is a retained-row coisometry. Letter by letter, it carries the left-associated product tensor to the recursive direct sum:
Consequently, after closing the horizontal operator index,
Exact reconstruction gives the reverse identities
If the positive trace-power coefficients are independent of the positive chain length and the terminal matrices are self-adjoint idempotents, then this recursive operator is self-adjoint and idempotent.
Local fix (Figure-11 fusion coisometry): The source embedding \(\widetilde U_N\) is \(W_N^\dagger \), the adjoint of the retained-row coisometry used above. Exact reverse fusion uses the active-support reconstruction of Appendix C.4, lines 2020–2029. See docs/paper-gaps/cpsv16_figure11_fusion_coisometry.tex.
Scope restriction (fixed initial label): This theorem concerns one chosen initial label and list of appended labels. The following theorem performs the vertical-canonical assembly over all labels and multiplicity coordinates. The commutator remains outside the present result; see docs/paper-gaps/cpsv16_topological_projector_recursion.tex.
- MPOTensor.BNTFusionCoisometryFamily.sequentialFusionCoisometry_mul_conjTranspose
- MPOTensor.BNTFusionCoisometryFamily.sequentialFusionCoisometry_mul_fusionChainTensor_mul_conjTranspose
- MPOTensor.BNTFusionCoisometryFamily.sequentialFusionCoisometry_mul_physTraceTransfer_mul_conjTranspose
- MPOTensor.BNTFusionCoisometryFamily.fusionChainTensor_eq_conjTranspose_mul_recursiveProjectorQ_mul
- MPOTensor.BNTFusionCoisometryFamily.physTraceTransfer_fusionChainTensor_eq_conjTranspose_mul_recursiveProjectorQ_mul
- MPOTensor.BNTFusionCoisometryFamily.recursiveProjectorQ_isStarProjection
For every triple \((\alpha , \beta , \gamma )\), if \(\chi _{\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma }\) has size \(r_{\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma }\), then for every \(L \ge 0\),
where \(\chi _{\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma ,k}\) are the diagonal entries.
Let \(\mathcal K\) be an injective normal tensor generating MPDOs. Suppose that there is one positive two-site bond \(B\) whose translates commute and, for every \(N\geq 2\), a constant \(c_N{\gt}0\) such that
If the physical-trace transfer of \(\mathcal K\) has zero correlation length, then \(\mathcal K\) saturates the area law.
This is the proposition at [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1597–1619 ] .
Under the one-site and two-site vertical basis-of-normal-tensors decompositions and the two completely positive, trace-preserving physical-closure transport identities, assume that the one-site tensor is in normalized BNT-refined horizontal form and defines a matrix product density operator. Then there are positive diagonal multiplicity matrices \(\chi _{\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma }\) and matrices \(U_{\alpha ,\beta }\) such that every diagonal entry is positive and
while the exact reconstruction is
This is the positive fusion decomposition of CPSV16, Appendix C.4, lines 2020–2029.
Scope restriction (active product BNT): Only active product corners occur. A label absent from a fixed product pair has zero fusion multiplicity. See docs/paper-gaps/cpsv16_bnt_uniqueness_zero_coefficient.tex.
Local fix (Figure-11 fixed-pair support): A fixed product pair may have no active corner, and no unsupported sector is inserted. See docs/paper-gaps/cpsv16_figure11_per_pair_support.tex.
Local fix (Figure-11 fusion coisometry): The retained-row map is a coisometry onto the active direct sum, and its adjoint gives the exact reconstruction. See docs/paper-gaps/cpsv16_figure11_fusion_coisometry.tex.
Under the hypotheses and with the notation of Theorem 26.9.76, let \(\mu _\alpha \) and \(\nu _\beta \) be the positive diagonal multiplicity matrices in the one-site and two-site vertical canonical forms, and set \(m_\alpha =\operatorname{tr}(\mu _\alpha )\) and \(n_\beta =\operatorname{tr}(\nu _\beta )\). For every horizontal bond matrix \(X\) and every sector \(\alpha \),
Consequently, for every tensor letter \(a\),
This is the coefficient identity in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.4, lines 2001–2008 ] . It compares the traces of the multiplicity matrices; it does not assert equality of their dimensions or of their individual diagonal entries.
Under precisely the hypotheses of Theorem 26.9.67, the transported maps satisfy
Thus \(\widetilde T\) and \(\widetilde S\) are mutually inverse. This is the identity-composition conclusion of [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.4, lines 1974–1995 ] .
Under the hypotheses of Theorem 26.9.67, the maps
are completely positive. The trace adjoints of the two square composites satisfy the Schwarz inequality in every simple summand.
Suppose that every one-site and two-site multiplicity space is nonzero and every corresponding diagonal weight is positive. Let \(\widetilde M^{(1)}\) and \(\widetilde M^{(2)}\) be the vertical tensors of \(M\) and its two-site blocking, and let \(B_1\) and \(B_2\) be their assembled one-site and two-site canonical forms. Assume that both canonical forms are bases of normal tensors and that, for every vertical letter \(\ell \),
Assume in addition that the physical maps \(T\) and \(S\) are completely positive and trace preserving and that, for every horizontal bond matrix \(Z\), the two physical-coordinate identities hold:
Then each transported map and both square composites preserve the appropriate total sector trace. For the individual maps,
For the square composites,
Neither of the stronger range inclusions is assumed:
Suppose that every multiplicity space for \(\mu _\alpha \) and \(\nu _\beta \) is nonzero, every diagonal entry of these two matrices is positive, and
Writing \(m_\alpha =\operatorname{tr}(\mu _\alpha )\) and \(n_\beta =\operatorname{tr}(\nu _\beta )\), one has
In particular, take \(X_\alpha =M_\alpha (X)\) and \(Y_\beta =A_\beta (X)\) from the contractions of the one-site and two-site vertical canonical forms. The physical closure identities for \(T\) and \(S\) then imply the two hypotheses above, so the same conclusions hold for these source-generated sector operators.
Suppose that the multiplicity spaces are nonzero, their diagonal weights are positive, the physical maps \(T\) and \(S\) are completely positive and trace preserving, and the vertical coordinate maps satisfy \(U_iU_i^\dagger =1\). Then \(\widetilde T\) and \(\widetilde S\) preserve pointwise positive semidefiniteness. For pointwise positive families \(X\in \mathcal A_1\) and \(Y\in \mathcal A_2\), their total sector traces obey
The trace loss vanishes precisely when
respectively.
This result concerns positivity and trace on positive elements. It does not assert a complete-positivity structure for the finite products, a trace-preserving extension to their full ambient matrix spaces, or an inverse relation between the two transported maps.
Under the hypotheses of Theorem 26.9.75, write
There are an equivalence \(\sigma \) of the two sector index sets, equalities \(D^{(1)}_\alpha =D^{(2)}_{\sigma (\alpha )}\), and unitaries \(V_\alpha \in M_{D^{(2)}_{\sigma (\alpha )}}(\mathbb {C})\) such that
where the nonzero entry on the right is in position \(\sigma (\alpha )\), and
where the entries on the left and right are in positions \(\sigma (\alpha )\) and \(\alpha \), respectively. These identities hold for every \(X\in M_{D^{(1)}_\alpha }(\mathbb {C})\) and \(Y\in M_{D^{(2)}_{\sigma (\alpha )}}(\mathbb {C})\). Here \(\iota _\alpha \) is the reindexing induced by the displayed dimension equality. These are the mutually inverse unitary formulas of [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.4, line 1997 ] . They make no assertion about the multiplicities, weights, or coefficient identity at lines 2001–2008.
Let the \(N\)-site operator generated by \(M\) be positive semidefinite, and let three consecutive regions have lengths \(a\), \(b\), and \(c\), with \(a+b+c\leq N\). After reindexing the reduced state of the first \(a+b+c\) sites as a tripartite state on \(A\otimes B\otimes C\), its four entropies in strong subadditivity are
Suppose the positive trace-power coefficients are independent of the positive chain length and common word selectors separate the final labels. Fix labels \(\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma ,\varepsilon \), and suppose that \(M_\varepsilon \) is injective at the present blocking. Write \(C^{\varepsilon ,\varepsilon '}_{\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma } =P^{\mathrm L}_{\varepsilon } C_{\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma } P^{\mathrm R}_{\varepsilon '}\) for the corner from the right final sector \(\varepsilon '\) to the left final sector \(\varepsilon \). There is a rectangular matrix \(F_\varepsilon :\mathcal H^{\mathrm R}_{\varepsilon } \to \mathcal H^{\mathrm L}_{\varepsilon }\) such that, after the canonical index identifications, \(C^{\varepsilon ,\varepsilon }_{\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma } =F_\varepsilon \otimes 1_{D_\varepsilon }\). For every \(\varepsilon '\ne \varepsilon \), \(C^{\varepsilon ,\varepsilon '}_{\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma }=0\). The selector identities and injectivity at the present blocking are additional hypotheses here. The theorem neither asserts that \(F_\varepsilon \) is square or invertible nor identifies it with the printed \(F\)-matrix of [ BMW\(^{+}\)17 , Section 3.4 ] ; no pentagon identity is asserted.
Suppose the positive trace-power coefficients are independent of the positive chain length and common selectors exist at a positive length. For every final label \(\varepsilon \), write \(C_\varepsilon =P^{\mathrm L}_{\varepsilon } C_{\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma } P^{\mathrm R}_{\varepsilon }\). Then
The conclusion is conditional on the simultaneous selector identities. It is the fixed-output-channel invertibility consequence of the simultaneous inverse used in [ BMW\(^{+}\)17 , lines 247–277 ] .
Suppose the positive trace-power coefficients are independent of the positive chain length and common word selectors exist. If \(\varepsilon \ne \varepsilon '\), then the corner of the full comparison from the right final sector \(\varepsilon '\) to the left final sector \(\varepsilon \) vanishes: \(P^{\mathrm L}_{\varepsilon } C_{\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma } P^{\mathrm R}_{\varepsilon '}=0\). The assertion is conditional on the displayed word-selector identities. It neither states that a diagonal corner is invertible nor identifies one with an \(F\)-matrix, and it does not assert the pentagon identity.
Suppose the positive trace-power coefficients are independent of the positive chain length. For every pair of physical indices \(i,k\), let
and define \(D^{\mathrm R}_{ik}\) by the right-associated multiplicities \(r_{\beta ,\gamma }^{\delta }\) and \(r_{\alpha ,\delta }^{\varepsilon }\). Then
This is an identity on the full direct sums. It neither extracts a fixed-final \(F\)-transformation nor proves invertibility or the pentagon identity.
Under the same hypotheses, \(C_{\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma }^{\dagger }C_{\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma }=1\). This proves invertibility on the full direct sums. It does not yet prove invertibility of a fixed-final multiplicity matrix.
Assume the hypotheses of Theorem 27.3.71. Suppose in addition that \(M_\varepsilon \) is injective at the present blocking and that \(D_\varepsilon {\gt}0\). There is a matrix \(F_\varepsilon :\mathcal H^{\mathrm R}_{\varepsilon } \to \mathcal H^{\mathrm L}_{\varepsilon }\) such that
Thus \(F_\varepsilon \) is invertible. Its orientation is opposite to the printed-\(F\) row/column convention of [ BMW\(^{+}\)17 , Section 3.4 ] ; no pentagon identity is asserted.
Under the same hypotheses, partition the normalized vertical sectors by equality of their matrix product vector families up to a fixed nonzero scalar per site. There are normal representatives \(M_\alpha \), an enumeration \(k=(\alpha ,q)\) of the original sectors, invertible matrices \(X_{\alpha ,q}\), and complex numbers \(\zeta _{\alpha ,q}\) of unit modulus, with \(X_{\alpha ,1}=\mathbb {1}\) and \(\zeta _{\alpha ,1}=1\), such that
The representatives are pairwise gauge-phase distinct and form a basis of normal tensors for the weighted block tensor \(\bigoplus _k\nu _kB_k\). Every grouped coefficient \(\nu _{\alpha ,q}\zeta _{\alpha ,q}\) is positive. With the physical isometries from Theorem 23.4.87 retained unchanged, one has both reducing identities, exact compression, and the literal reconstruction
For each pair \((\alpha ,q)\), the range projector of \(V_{\alpha ,q}\) obeys the representative-loop identity and gives a nonzero compression at some finite length. This is the decomposition and positivity argument of [ CPGSV16 , Proposition 4.13, lines 1898–1902 ] . The relative Gram identity and proportional-unitary normalization of lines 1903–1908 are not asserted here.
Suppose that \((M_\alpha )_\alpha \) is a basis of normal tensors, every multiplicity space is nonzero, and every diagonal entry of \(\mu _\alpha \) is positive. Then there is a positive integer \(L\) such that \(C_L(V_m)=\prod _\alpha M_{d_\alpha }=:\mathcal A_1\). This is the spanning assertion used in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.4, lines 1980–1990 ] .
Let \(K\) be an MPO tensor in normalized BNT-refined horizontal form that generates matrix product density operators. Then both \(K\) and \(K^{[2]}\) satisfy the vertical canonical-form conditions of Definition 23.4.6. This is the initial canonical-form step in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.4, lines 1951–1956 ] .
Under the same hypotheses, there are orthogonal projections \(P_k\) that are complete and pairwise orthogonal and, for every vertical letter \(v\), reduce the corresponding letter:
For a bond matrix \(X\), write \(\mathcal M^{(1)}(X)\) and \(\mathcal M^{(2)}(X)\) for the one-site and two-site physical closures, respectively, and write
for the contracted one-site and two-site vertical canonical forms. If
then
These are the physical-coordinate identities which, after composition with \(R_1,R_2,\widetilde R_1,\widetilde R_2\), give the two displayed identities for \(\widetilde T\) and \(\widetilde S\) in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.4, lines 1955–1979 ] .
Let \(M\) be an MPO tensor and put \(T=\widetilde M\). Let \(B_k\) have bond dimension \(d_k\), let \(\mu _k\in \mathbb {C}\), and let \(V_k:\mathbb {C}^{d_k}\to \mathbb {C}^d\) be an isometry for \(0\leq k{\lt}r\). Assume, for every vertical letter \(v\), that
Partition the tensors \(B_k\) into matrix-product-vector phase classes and choose one representative \(A_\alpha \) from each class. If \(\{ A_\alpha \} _\alpha \) is a basis of normal tensors in the spectral sense for the weighted direct sum \(A_{\mathrm{ret}}=\bigoplus _{k=0}^{r-1}\mu _kB_k\), then \(\{ A_\alpha \} _\alpha \) is an algebraic basis of normal tensors for \(T\).
This is the basis-of-normal-tensors conclusion in [ CPGSV16 , Proposition 4.13, lines 1863–1921 ] , stated for the grouped decomposition before the final coisometry is formed.
Under the hypotheses of Theorem 23.4.84, there are positive integers \(d_k\), tensors \(B_k\) of bond dimension \(d_k\), and isometries \(V_k:\mathbb {C}^{d_k}\to \mathbb {C}^d\) such that
Every \(B_k\) is irreducible, and for every vertical letter \(v\),
Moreover, \(\widetilde M\) and the unit-weight direct sum \(\bigoplus _kB_k\) have the same matrix product vectors at every positive length.
Let \(M\) generate matrix product density operators and suppose that periodic vectors of \(M\) supply projectors. Then the vertically viewed tensor \(\widetilde M\) has no nontrivial \(p\)-periodic vectors. This is the periodic-sector step in the proof of [ CPGSV16 , Proposition 4.13 ] , lines 1888–1893, granted the projector that the source draws from the general theory of the peripheral spectrum.
Let \(M\) be in normalized BNT-refined horizontal form. If an idempotent \(Q\) satisfies \(Q\widetilde M\ne Q\widetilde MQ\), then for some \(N\ge 0\), \(Q_1H^{(N+1)}\ne H^{(N+1)}Q_1\). Consequently, if \(M\) generates matrix product density operators, then \(\widetilde M\) has no nontrivial periodic vectors.
Scope restriction (BNT-refined horizontal form): the normalized BNT-refined horizontal hypothesis is stronger than the literal CPSV canonical-form hypothesis.
Let \(M\) generate matrix product density operators and let \(M\)’s doubled-index tensor be injective. Then the vertically viewed tensor \(\widetilde M\) has no nontrivial periodic vectors, unconditionally.
Let \(M\) generate matrix product density operators, and suppose that its doubled-index MPS tensor is in literal CPSV canonical form. Then the vertically viewed tensor \(\widetilde M\) has no nontrivial periodic vectors.
Under the same hypotheses, there are positive integers \(d_k\), positive scalars \(\nu _k\), normal tensors \(B_k\) of bond dimension \(d_k\), and isometries \(V_k:\mathbb {C}^{d_k}\to \mathbb {C}^d\) with pairwise orthogonal ranges. For every sector \(k\) and every vertical letter \(v\),
Moreover, every vertical letter is reconstructed literally by
Let \(M\) be in normalized BNT-refined horizontal form, generate matrix product density operators, and satisfy the renormalization fixed-point condition of Definition 26.2.1. Then one may choose a vertical basis of normal tensors \(\{ M_\alpha \} _\alpha \) for which there are positive diagonal matrices \(\chi _{\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma }\) and matrices \(U_{\alpha ,\beta }\). Every diagonal entry of \(\chi _{\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma }\) is positive, and
Thus the renormalization fixed-point and matrix-product-density-operator assumptions, together with normalized BNT-refined horizontal form, imply the positive fusion decomposition of CPSV16, Appendix C.4, lines 2020–2029.
Scope restriction (active product BNT): Only active product corners occur. A label absent from a fixed product pair has zero fusion multiplicity. See docs/paper-gaps/cpsv16_bnt_uniqueness_zero_coefficient.tex.
Local fix (Figure-11 fixed-pair support): A fixed product pair may have no active corner, and no unsupported sector is inserted. See docs/paper-gaps/cpsv16_figure11_per_pair_support.tex.
Local fix (Figure-11 fusion coisometry): The retained-row map is a coisometry onto the active direct sum, and its adjoint gives the exact reconstruction. See docs/paper-gaps/cpsv16_figure11_fusion_coisometry.tex.
Let \(M\) be in normalized BNT-refined horizontal form and generate matrix product density operators. If an orthogonal projection \(P\) satisfies \(P\widetilde M_v=P\widetilde M_vP\) for every vertical letter \(v\), then it also satisfies \(\widetilde M_vP=P\widetilde M_vP\) for every vertical letter \(v\). Thus the vertically viewed tensor has invariant-projector closure.
Let \(M\) generate matrix product density operators, and suppose that its doubled-index MPS tensor is in literal CPSV canonical form. If an orthogonal projection \(P\) satisfies \(P\widetilde M_v=P\widetilde M_vP\) for every vertical letter \(v\), then
for every \(v\). Thus the vertically viewed tensor has invariant-projector closure.
Let \((d_\alpha )_\alpha \) and \((r_\alpha )_\alpha \) be finite families of dimensions with \(r_\alpha {\gt}0\), and suppose that every diagonal entry of \(\mu _\alpha \) is positive. Then the normalized embedding
is a direct-sum Kraus map. Without any condition on the multiplicities, the map
is a direct-sum Kraus map. Its restriction to the weighted sectors is the retraction in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.4, lines 1961–1970 ] .
There is a tensor of bond dimension two with four one-dimensional physical sectors and weights \(p_k\) such that the following statements hold simultaneously: the tensor is injective and has source zero correlation length; its physical-trace transfer is idempotent; for every \(k\in \{ 0,1,2,3\} \), the weights satisfy
its sector virtual matrices span \(M_{2}(\mathbb {C})\); every neighboring operator is positive semidefinite; and its active trace matrix is primitive and has trace one. Nevertheless, if \(S=LQ\) is the physical-trace transfer and \(T=QL\) is the active trace matrix, then \(Q(1-S)L=T-T^2\ne 0\). In particular, full virtual-matrix spanning does not by itself imply that the active trace matrix is idempotent.
In the retained coordinates, the product tensor is the orthogonal direct sum over ordered pairs of BNT copies. Its summand indexed by \(((\alpha ,q),(\beta ,r))\) is \(\mu _{\alpha ,q}\mu _{\beta ,r}(M_\alpha M_\beta )\). Every such summand has invariant-projector closure and has no nontrivial periodic vectors. This includes zero-dimensional summands and requires no nonvanishing assumption on the displayed scalar.
For every ordered pair of retained BNT copies, the weighted product tensor has an exact orthogonal decomposition into positive multiples of normal tensors. The corresponding corner isometries are retained, intertwine in both directions, and reconstruct every tensor letter. The active family is allowed to be empty; in particular, no normal block is introduced for a zero-dimensional or identically zero copy-pair tensor.
The neighboring operators of the reparameterized factorization are
Thus a zero-weight sector has no outgoing support edge. Since \(p_h=0\) also gives \(l_h=0\), it has no incoming support edge either.
The adjoint tensor generates the adjoint operator family up to spatial reflection: entrywise,
where \(\mathrm{rev}\) reverses the site order. For an MPDO and \(N\geq 1\), the conjugation disappears:
and the adjoint tensor is again an MPDO.
Let \(D\geq 1\), and let \(W\) be a real diagonal coefficient matrix across a periodic cut of an MPO with bond dimension \(D\). Suppose its scalar extension to \(\mathbb {C}\) is the cut matrix \(P^{\mathbb {C}}\) from Theorem 26.6.41. If \(Z{\gt}0\) and \(P=Z^{-1}W\) is a joint probability distribution, then \(I(X:Y)_P\leq 2\log D\).
Split a periodic chain into consecutive blocks of lengths \(L\) and \(R\). For words \(x\in \{ 0,\ldots ,d-1\} ^L\) and \(y\in \{ 0,\ldots ,d-1\} ^R\), set
Then the ordinary complex rank of \(P\) satisfies \(\operatorname{rank}_{\mathbb {C}}P\le D^2\).
Let \(D\geq 1\). Suppose that \(\rho ^{(L+R)}(M)\) is diagonal and positive semidefinite, and that \(Z{\gt}0\). Then \(W_{x,y}\geq 0\), the scalar extension of \(W\) to \(\mathbb {C}\) is the diagonal cut matrix of Theorem 26.6.41, and \(\widehat P\) is a joint probability distribution. Its classical mutual information satisfies \(I(X:Y)_{\widehat P}\leq 2\log D\).
Let \(M\) be the ancilla contraction of a purifying spin–ancilla tensor \(A\) through a bond identification \(e\), so that
Then at every length \(N\) the matrix product operator equals the ancillary trace of the pure spin–ancilla matrix product state, \(\rho ^{(N)}(M)=\rho ^{(N)}_p(A)\). This is the coefficient form of the purification equation of [ CPGSV16 , line 751 ] .
For every system size \(N\), the operator generated by a layer product is the product of the density operators generated by the layers, \(H^{(N)}(MM')=H^{(N)}(M)\, H^{(N)}(M')\). Consequently the \(p\)-fold vertical stack generates \(H^{(N)}(M^{[p]})=[H^{(N)}(M)]^p\) for all \(N\) and \(p\); this is the reading of the powers in the displayed identity of [ CPGSV16 , Proposition 4.13, lines 1890–1891 ] as density operators of stacked layers. In particular, the vertical stack of a tensor generating matrix product density operators again generates matrix product density operators on every nonempty chain.
The vertically viewed letters of a layer product are the products of the layers’ vertically viewed letters, \((MM')_{(a,a'),(b,b')}=M_{ab}M'_{a'b'}\). Hence every vertically viewed letter of the \(p\)-fold stack \(M^{[p]}\) is the evaluation of a length-\(p\) word of \(\widetilde M\). In particular, if a matrix \(Q\) satisfies the one-sided invariance \(QA_w=QA_wQ\) for every product \(A_w\) of \(p\) letters of \(\widetilde M\), then \(QM^{[p]}=QM^{[p]}Q\) in the sense of Definition 23.4.31.
The MPV of a block-diagonal tensor decomposes as
Equivalently, for each configuration \(\sigma \) one has
Let \(A\) and \(B\) be positive semidefinite, and let \(f\colon \mathbb {R}\to \mathbb {R}\) be multiplicative on the non-negative reals. Then
For any tripartite density matrix \(\rho _{ABC}\) on \(A \otimes B \otimes C\),
where the left-hand side is the bipartite mutual information of the reduced state \(\rho _{AB} = \operatorname{tr}_C(\rho _{ABC})\) and the right-hand side is evaluated by expanding \(I(A{:}BC) = S(\rho _A) + S(\rho _{BC}) - S(\rho _{ABC})\).
Let \(V:\mathbb {C}^D\to \mathbb {C}^D\otimes \mathbb {C}^n\) satisfy \(V^\dagger P_iV=E_i\) for the canonical projectors \(P_i=\mathbb {1}_D\otimes |i\rangle \! \langle i|\). Then there exists an isometry \(W\) on the dilated space such that \(V=WV_0\), where \(V_0\) is the canonical Naimark isometry of \(\{ E_i\} \).
The Naimark projectors satisfy
If \(A, B \in M_{n}(\mathbb {C})\) satisfy \(\operatorname{tr}(A^k) = \operatorname{tr}(B^k)\) for all \(k \ge 1\), then \(A\) and \(B\) have the same characteristic polynomial. It is enough to assume this equality for \(1 \le k \le n\).
Suppose that the canonical length-two parent terms of \(A\) commute on a three-site chain. Then the complementary two-site interaction admits a finite sector graph as in Definition 14.1.74.
- MPSTensor.IsNNCPH.nonempty_beigiSectorGraphData
- MPSTensor.IsNNCPH.beigiSectorGraphData
- MPSTensor.twoSiteParentInteractionMatrix_isStarProjection
- MPSTensor.twoSiteParentGroundProjectorMatrix_isStarProjection
- MPSTensor.twoSiteParentGroundProjectorMatrix_posSemidef
- MPSTensor.IsNNCPH.twoSiteParentGroundProjectorMatrix_overlappingLifts_commute
Let \(P\) be a sector decomposition with representatives \(A_1,\ldots ,A_g\) and total tensor \(B\). Suppose that the vectors \(\{ |V^{(N)}(A_j)\rangle \} _{j=1}^g\) are linearly independent for all sufficiently large \(N\), and that \(B\) satisfies the all-chain nearest-neighbor commuting parent-Hamiltonian ground-space condition with these representatives. Then there is \(N_0\) such that, for every \(N{\gt}N_0\), \(\dim _{\mathbb {C}}\ker H_2^{(N)}(B) = g\). Thus the ground-state degeneracy is eventually constant, as required in [ Bei12 , Section IV ] .
Let \(B\) be normal and in left-canonical form. Suppose that the family \(A_j\) is a BNT for \(B\), and that the nearest-neighbor parent Hamiltonian of \(B\) has the all-chain ground-space property of Definition 14.1.17: for every \(N{\gt}2\), the length-two translated parent interactions commute, \(h_i(B,2)h_j(B,2)=h_j(B,2)h_i(B,2)\), the vector \(V^{(N)}(B)\) has zero energy, and \(\ker H_2^{(N)}(B) = \operatorname{span}\{ V^{(N)}(A_j):j=1,\ldots ,g\} \). Then \(B\) is a renormalization fixed point.
This is the normal left-canonical representative case of the reverse implication in Theorem 3.10 of [ CPGSV16 ] . The source theorem is stated for a tensor in canonical form; the unrestricted canonical-form statement is not asserted here.
An MPO tensor is a nondegenerate purification renormalization fixed point if and only if it is a local purification density operator (Definition 23.3.2) and
This is the normalized, nonzero structural characterization used in the forward PRFP-to-ZCL implication of [ CPGSV16 , lines 744–786 ] .
Every MPS tensor \(A\) admits a finite family of nonzero irreducible blocks \((B_k)_{k=1}^r\), each with at least one nonzero Kraus operator and positive bond dimension. For every \(N\ge 1\) and every \(\sigma \),
Moreover, \(\sum _{k=1}^rD_k\le D\).
Let \(D{\gt}0\), suppose \(\sum _i(A^i)^\dagger A^i=\mathbb {1}\), and assume that \(A\) is primitive in the sense of Definition 8.1.1.3. Then there is a word \(w\) with
This is the sharp trace conclusion of [ SPGWC10 , Lemma 1 ] .
Let \(D{\gt}0\). If \(A\) is normal, then there exists a word \(w\) of length at most \(D^2-\operatorname{kr}(A)+1\) such that \(\operatorname{tr}(A^w)\neq 0\). This normality variant has the same sharp length bound as [ SPGWC10 , Lemma 1 ] ; the source hypotheses are stated in Theorem 8.2.3.
If \(A\) is normal and \(D\ge 1\), then there exists a word \(w\) of positive length \(1\le |w|\le D^2-\operatorname{kr}(A)+1\) such that \(\operatorname{tr}(A^w)\neq 0\). This strengthens Theorem 8.2.4 by requiring \(|w|\ge 1\), a feature needed for the blocking argument in the general Wielandt bound below.
For \(s \in [0,t]\), \(M = \sup _{u \in [0,t]}\| e^{uL}\| \), and \(M' = \sup _{u \in [0,t]}\| e^{uL'}\| \),
If \(A\) is a primitive MPS tensor with positive-definite fixed point \(\rho \), then \(A\) is normal (has eventually full Kraus rank). No identity-in-the-one-step-span condition is needed.
This connects the complementary-gap condition in Definition 8.6.1 directly to normality.
Let \(A\) be \(L_0\)-block-injective with \(D \ge 1\) and \(L_0 {\gt} 0\). If an \(N\)-site state satisfies the ground-space constraint on every non-wrapping contiguous interval of length \(L_0+1\), for every fixed choice of the complementary sites, with \(N \ge L_0+1\), then it lies in \(G_N(A)\).
Let \(A\) and \(B\) be normal tensors of positive, possibly different, bond dimensions. Suppose that, for all sufficiently large \(N\), their matrix product vectors are proportional by a nonzero scalar. Then there is \(a\in \mathbb {C}\), with \(|a|=1\), such that \(|V^{(N)}(A)\rangle =a^N|V^{(N)}(B)\rangle \) for every positive \(N\). This is the one-normal-block consequence of [ CPGSV16 , Corollary A.3 and the proof of Theorem 2.10 ] .
If \(A\) is normal, \(D \ge 1\), and injective after blocking \(L_0{\gt}0\) sites, with \(N \ge 2\), \(L_0+1{\lt}N\), and \(L_0 {\lt} L \le N\), then \(\mathcal G_{N,L}(A) \subseteq \operatorname{span}\bigl\{ V^{(N)}(A)\bigr\} \).
Let \(M_\alpha \) be a normal tensor. Any matrix commuting with every matrix of \(M_\alpha \) is a scalar multiple of the identity. In particular, if \(X\ne 0\) and \(X^\dagger X\) commutes with every matrix of \(M_\alpha \), then \(X^\dagger X=\omega \mathbb {1}\) for a necessarily positive constant \(\omega \), and \(\omega ^{-1/2}X\) is unitary. This is the normalized form \(X_{\alpha ,k}^\dagger X_{\alpha ,k}=\omega _{\alpha ,k}\mathbb {1}\) of the Gram-matrix proportionality in the proof of [ CPGSV16 , Proposition 4.13 ] , with \(X_{\alpha ,1}=\mathbb {1}\) and \(U_{\alpha ,k}=\omega _{\alpha ,k}^{-1/2}X_{\alpha ,k}\). Deriving the commutation from self-adjointness of the sector compressions is a separate step.
Let \(A\) and \(B\) be irreducible trace-preserving blocks whose self-overlaps converge to \(1\). If they are not gauge-phase equivalent, then for every lower bound \(N_0\) there is \(N \ge N_0\) such that \(|V^{(N)}(A)\rangle \) is not proportional to \(|V^{(N)}(B)\rangle \). Consequently, in an already separated same-dimensional BNT block family, any two distinct blocks have such non-proportional MPV states at arbitrarily large lengths.
Let \(\rho \) be a trace-one Hermitian bipartite state. Then the Schmidt number of \(\rho \) exceeds \(n\) if and only if there is a Hermitian operator \(W\) such that, for every \(\psi \) of Schmidt rank at most \(n\),
This is Wolf’s Proposition 3.3 [ Wol12 , Chapter 3, Proposition 3.3 ] : a state has Schmidt number larger than \(n\) exactly when it is detected by an entanglement witness for \(S_n\).
Let \(A\) and \(B\) be irreducible MPS tensors of the same bond dimension with \(\sum _i(A^i)^\dagger A^i=\mathbb {1}\) and \(\sum _i(B^i)^\dagger B^i=\mathbb {1}\). If \(\| \langle V^{(N)}(A) | V^{(N)}(B) \rangle \| \to 1\), then \(A\) and \(B\) are gauge-phase equivalent.
For a unital Kraus map \(E\), both \(\mathcal{A}_R(E)\) and \(\mathcal{A}_L(E)\) are unital subalgebras of \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\).
For elements \(a,b\) of a unital C\({}^\ast \)-algebra with \(0\le a,b\), an exponent \(p\in [1,2]\), and \(t\in [0,1]\), the map \(a\mapsto a^p\) is convex for the Loewner order on the positive cone:
This is the convex counterpart of the operator concavity of \(x\mapsto x^p\) for exponents \(p\in [0,1]\).
Write \(\rho _{ij}\in M_{d_B}(\mathbb {C})\) for the blocks determined by a basis of the first factor, and define \(\mathcal R_\rho (X)=\sum _{i,j}X_{ij}\rho _{ij}\). Then
For a complex square matrix, the two descriptions \(P=P^\dagger \), \(P^2=P\) and \(P^*=P\), \(P^2=P\) are equivalent.
Let \(E\) be an irreducible completely positive map on \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), and let \(A, B \ge 0\) be nonzero positive semidefinite matrices with \(\operatorname{tr}(BA) = 0\). Then there exists \(t\) with \(1 \le t \le D - 1\) such that \(\operatorname{tr}(BE^t(A)) {\gt} 0\).
Let \(A\) be a tensor and let \(L{\gt}1\). Suppose that, for every \(N\ge 2L\) and every overlapping off-diagonal pair of cyclic length-\(L\) windows,
Then the parent Hamiltonian has the explicit gap constant \(\gamma _L:=1/(4L){\gt}0\). Concretely, if \(N\ge 2L\) and \(v\in (\mathcal G_{N,L}^{\mathrm{ES}}(A))^\perp \), then \(\gamma _L\| v\| \le \| H_{N,L}^{\mathrm{ES}}(A)v\| \).
Let \(L{\gt}1\). Put \(m=2(L-1)\). Suppose that there is a constant \(\eta \ge 0\) such that \(\eta m{\lt}1\), and suppose that, for every \(N\ge 2L\) and every overlapping off-diagonal pair of cyclic length-\(L\) windows,
Then the parent Hamiltonian has the gap constant \(1-\eta m{\gt}0\). Concretely, if \(N\ge 2L\) and \(v\in (\mathcal G_{N,L}^{\mathrm{ES}}(A))^\perp \), then \((1-\eta m)\| v\| \le \| H_{N,L}^{\mathrm{ES}}(A)v\| \).
Let \(L{\gt}1\). Put \(m=2(L-1)\). Suppose there is a constant \(\eta \ge 0\) with \(\eta m{\lt}1\) and that, for every \(N\ge 2L\) and every overlapping off-diagonal pair of cyclic length-\(L\) windows,
that is, a bound \(\| h_{i,\mathrm{ES}}h_{j,\mathrm{ES}}\| \le \eta \) on the operator-product norm rather than the directional bound of Theorem 14.3.3.5. Then the parent Hamiltonian has the gap constant \(1-\eta m{\gt}0\). Concretely, if \(N\ge 2L\) and \(v\in (\mathcal G_{N,L}^{\mathrm{ES}}(A))^\perp \), then \((1-\eta m)\| v\| \le \| H_{N,L}^{\mathrm{ES}}(A)v\| \). This is a conditional reduction. The local terms \(h_{i,\mathrm{ES}}=p_i\) are the excitation projections. If their overlapping ranges have a common nonzero vector, then \(\| h_{i,\mathrm{ES}}h_{j,\mathrm{ES}}\| =1\), so the hypothesis is unsatisfiable for \(\eta {\lt}1\) in that case. In degenerate cases, such as a zero excitation projection, the operator-product norm can be smaller. In any case this is not the quantity controlled by the cited principal-angle estimates. The comparison is documented in docs/paper-gaps/cpgsv21_martingale_overlap.tex.
Let \(\mathcal{H}=\mathbb {C}^d\), and let \(Q\) be an endomorphism of \(\mathcal{H}\otimes \mathcal{H}\). Under the canonical identifications of two- and three-site configurations with pairs and right-associated triples, the matrices of its two adjacent actions are
Equivalently, for all \(a,x,b,a',x',b'\in \{ 0,\ldots ,d{-}1\} \),
This is the homogeneous three-single-site specialization of the factor actions on \(\mathcal{H}_A\otimes \mathcal{H}_X\otimes \mathcal{H}_B\) in [ CPGSV16 , Definition D.2 ] ; here \(\mathcal{H}_A=\mathcal{H}_X=\mathcal{H}_B=\mathcal{H}\). No assertion is made for unequal factor spaces.
Let \(T\) be a sector trace matrix with \(\operatorname{tr}(T)=1\), paired from sector tensors satisfying the zero-correlation-length identity of Definition 26.10.6.33. If the closed sector tensors \(|l_0),\ldots ,|l_{n-1})\) are linearly independent, then there are real numbers \(a_k,b_h\) such that
The same conclusion holds if, instead of the independence, \(T\) is primitive and the closed sector tensors lie in distinct members of an independent family of subspaces. In contrast with the positive-semidefinite criterion of Theorem 26.10.6.32, the constant trace powers are derived rather than assumed.
Let \(A\) be an MPS tensor. Then there exists a blocking length \(p \ge 1\), nonzero weights \(\mu _k\), and blocks \(B_k\) over the blocked alphabet, such that:
every block has positive bond dimension;
every block is TP-normalized, primitive, irreducible, and injective;
\(A^{[p]}\) and \(\bigoplus _k \mu _k B_k\) generate the same MPV family at every positive length.
Moreover, under \(|\mu _k| \le 1\) for every \(k\) and \(|\mu _k|=1\) for at least one \(k\), there exists a sector decomposition \(P\) over the blocked alphabet in the BNT canonical form of Definition 10.6.1.11 such that \(A^{[p]}\) and \(P\) generate the same MPV family at every positive length.
Let \(A\) be an MPS tensor whose matrix-product family has a nonzero coefficient at some positive length. Then there exist a blocking length \(p\geq 1\), a positive real \(m\), and a sector decomposition \(P\) over the blocked alphabet in the BNT canonical form of Definition 10.6.1.11, such that for every positive length \(N\),
The scalar \(m^{N}\) is the per-site normalization cost of the line-246 weight choice; the hypotheses of Theorem F.3.7 are discharged rather than assumed.
Scope restriction (nonzero MPV family). The source proposition says “for any tensor”, but the zero MPV family cannot supply the global unit-modulus weight imposed immediately before it. The hypothesis above is exactly the exclusion of this degenerate case. The normalization issue and the proportional-MPV comparison are documented in docs/paper-gaps/cpsv16_cf_normalization_and_proportional_comparison.tex.
Let \(r \in \mathbb {N}\), and for each \(k = 1,\ldots ,r\) let \(D_k \in \mathbb {N}\), \(\mu _k \in \mathbb {C}\), and let \(B_k\) be an MPS tensor of physical dimension \(d\) and bond dimension \(D_k\). Assume:
positive bond dimensions: \(D_k {\gt} 0\) for all \(k\),
TP normalization: \(\sum _i (B_k^i)^\dagger B_k^i = \mathbb {1}\),
primitivity: \(\mathcal{E}_{B_k}\) is primitive for each \(k\),
irreducibility: each \(B_k\) is irreducible,
nonzero weights: \(\mu _k \neq 0\) for all \(k\),
bounded weights: \(|\mu _k| \le 1\) for all \(k\),
global unit witness: \(|\mu _k| = 1\) for some \(k\).
Then there exists a sector decomposition \(P\) such that \(P\) and \(\bigoplus _{k=1}^{r} \mu _k B_k\) generate the same MPV family at every positive length, and \(P\) satisfies the basis-of-normal-tensors conditions (Definition 10.1.2) together with the multiplicity, span, and weight-bound conditions of Definition 10.6.1.11.
For nonzero weights \(\mu _1,\ldots ,\mu _r\) with \(r\geq 1\) there is a positive real \(m\) such that every normalized weight satisfies
and at least one normalized weight has unit modulus, \(|\mu _{k_0}/m|=1\). This is the normalization that [ CPGSV16 , line 246 ] chooses for the canonical-form weights.
If \(A^i=\bigoplus _j\mu _j A_j^i\) is in block-injective canonical form, where \(A_1,\ldots ,A_g\) is a basis of normal tensors, assume \(g\ge 2\) and \(\mu _j\ne 0\) for every \(j\). Let \(L_0\ge 1\) be a common injectivity length for the blocks, and suppose
and assume the block-diagonal boundary-condition comparison in the periodic ring,
Then
For a tensor \(A\) and a range \(L{\gt}1\), assume either the cyclic-window anticommutator estimate of Theorem 14.3.3.4 or the stronger overlapping cyclic-window norm-compression estimate of Theorem 14.3.3.3. Then there exists \(\gamma {\gt}0\) such that for every \(N\ge 2L\) and every vector \(v\in (\mathcal G_{N,L}^{\mathrm{ES}}(A))^\perp \) one has \(\gamma \| v\| \le \| H_{N,L}^{\mathrm{ES}}(A)v\| \). By Lemma 14.3.18, this implies the usual uniform lower bound on every nonzero eigenvalue of the parent Hamiltonian.
For a tensor \(A\) and a range \(L{\gt}1\), suppose there is a constant \(\eta \ge 0\) such that \(\eta \, 2(L-1){\lt}1\) and, for every \(N\ge 2L\) and every overlapping off-diagonal pair of cyclic length-\(L\) windows,
Then there exists \(\gamma {\gt}0\) such that, for every \(N\ge 2L\) and every vector \(v\in (\mathcal G_{N,L}^{\mathrm{ES}}(A))^\perp \), \(\gamma \| v\| \le \| H_{N,L}^{\mathrm{ES}}(A)v\| \).
For a tensor \(A\) and a range \(L{\gt}1\), suppose there is a constant \(\eta \ge 0\) such that \(\eta \, 2(L-1){\lt}1\) and, for every \(N\ge 2L\) and every overlapping off-diagonal pair of cyclic length-\(L\) windows,
Then there exists \(\gamma {\gt}0\) such that, for every \(N\ge 2L\) and every vector \(v\in (\mathcal G_{N,L}^{\mathrm{ES}}(A))^\perp \), \(\gamma \| v\| \le \| H_{N,L}^{\mathrm{ES}}(A)v\| \). As in Theorem 14.3.3.6, this is a conditional reduction: the operator-product hypothesis is unsatisfiable for any overlapping pair whose excitation ranges have a common nonzero vector, since then \(\| h_{i,\mathrm{ES}}h_{j,\mathrm{ES}}\| =1\). The statement does not assert this norm identity in degenerate cases.
Assume \(N{\gt}0\) and \(L\le N\). Then \(\ker H_N(A,L)=G_L^{(N)}(A)\). Equivalently, after the canonical Hilbert-space identification, \(\mathcal K_N^{\mathrm{ES}}(A,L)=e_N^{-1}G_L^{(N)}(A)\), where \(\mathcal K_N^{\mathrm{ES}}(A,L)\) is the zero-energy space of \(H_{N,L}^{\mathrm{ES}}(A)\).
Assume \(N{\gt}0\) and \(L\le N\). If a vector \(\psi \) has zero energy for the finite periodic parent Hamiltonian, \(H_N(A,L)\psi =0\), then every cyclic length-\(L\) restriction of \(\psi \) lies in the local MPS ground space. Equivalently, \(\ker H_N(A,L)\subseteq G_L^{(N)}(A)\).
Fix \(L\geq 1\). For every \(N{\gt}L\), the tensor in Definition 26.6.8 satisfies
Consequently the sequence \(K\mapsto I_L^{(L+K+1)}\) does not converge, giving the counterexample described in [ CPGSV16 , Proposition 4.5, lines 801–806 ] .
- MPOTensor.ThermodynamicLimitCounterexample.normalizedMPO_parityTensor_of_odd
- MPOTensor.ThermodynamicLimitCounterexample.normalizedMPO_parityTensor_of_even
- MPOTensor.ThermodynamicLimitCounterexample.reducedBlockState_parityTensor_of_odd
- MPOTensor.ThermodynamicLimitCounterexample.reducedBlockState_parityTensor_of_even
- MPOTensor.ThermodynamicLimitCounterexample.blockEntropy_parityTensor_of_odd
- MPOTensor.ThermodynamicLimitCounterexample.blockEntropy_parityTensor_of_even
- MPOTensor.ThermodynamicLimitCounterexample.mutualInfoChain_parityTensor_of_odd
- MPOTensor.ThermodynamicLimitCounterexample.mutualInfoChain_parityTensor_of_even
- MPOTensor.ThermodynamicLimitCounterexample.binEntropy_one_div_three_pos
- MPOTensor.ThermodynamicLimitCounterexample.parityMutualInfoAfterCut
- MPOTensor.ThermodynamicLimitCounterexample.not_exists_tendsto_parityMutualInfoAfterCut
The tensor in Definition 26.6.8 generates the positive operators
Their traces are \(2+(-1)^N\). The all-zero diagonal entry of the normalized one-site reduced state is therefore one for odd \(N\) and \(1/3\) for positive even \(N\). In particular, the normalized periodic one-site reduced states do not converge as \(N\to \infty \).
Thus normalized periodic marginals need not converge under the hypotheses of [ CPGSV16 , Proposition 4.5, lines 801–806 ] . The mutual information of this same family is computed in docs/paper-gaps/cpgsv17_mpdo_mutual_information_bound.tex.
- MPOTensor.ThermodynamicLimitCounterexample.mpo_parityTensor_eq_diagonal
- MPOTensor.ThermodynamicLimitCounterexample.parityTensor_isMPDO
- MPOTensor.ThermodynamicLimitCounterexample.trace_mpo_parityTensor
- MPOTensor.ThermodynamicLimitCounterexample.normalizedMPO_zeroConfig_of_odd
- MPOTensor.ThermodynamicLimitCounterexample.normalizedMPO_zeroConfig_of_even
- MPOTensor.ThermodynamicLimitCounterexample.reducedBlockState_one_zero_zero_of_odd
- MPOTensor.ThermodynamicLimitCounterexample.reducedBlockState_one_zero_zero_of_even
- MPOTensor.ThermodynamicLimitCounterexample.not_exists_tendsto_reducedBlockState_one_zero_zero
Let \(\sigma \) be positive semidefinite on \(H_L\otimes H_R\), and let \(\rho \) be any matrix on the same space such that \(\ker \sigma \subseteq \ker \rho \). Then
Let \(\rho \) and \(\sigma \) be positive semidefinite matrices on \(H_L\otimes H_R\) such that \(\ker \sigma \subseteq \ker \rho \). Then
Let \(X\) be a matrix on \(H_L\otimes H_R\), let \(w\in H_L\), and let \((e_r)_r\) be the distinguished orthonormal basis of \(H_R\). Then
Let \(\rho \) and \(\sigma \) be positive definite and suppose that \(D(\rho \Vert \sigma ) =D(\operatorname{tr}_C\rho \Vert \operatorname{tr}_C\sigma )\). Put
Then
Hence the raw partial-trace Petz map satisfies \(\mathcal R_\sigma (\operatorname{tr}_C\rho )=\rho \). This is the positive-definite case only; no singular-support conclusion is asserted.
Let \(\rho \) and \(\sigma \) be positive definite, and suppose that \(D(\rho \Vert \sigma )=D(\operatorname{tr}_C\rho \Vert \operatorname{tr}_C\sigma )\). For the uniformly weighted Weyl conjugates \(A_g=d_C^{-2}U_g\rho U_g^\dagger \) and \(B_g=d_C^{-2}U_g\sigma U_g^\dagger \), put \(A=\sum _gA_g\) and \(B=\sum _gB_g\). Then
For matrices \(U,V\) on the first factor and a bipartite matrix \(\rho \), conjugating inside by \(V\) and \(U\), taking the first-factor partial transpose, and conjugating outside by \(U\) and \(V\) produces the original partial transpose conjugated by \(U U^{\mathsf T}\) and \(V^{\mathsf T}V\):
For Pauli directions \(a,k\in \{ x,y,z\} \),
Consequently, the dissipator generated by \(\sigma _a\) is \(\mathcal D_{\sigma _a}(X)=\sigma _aX\sigma _a-X\).
Let \(D{\gt}0\) and \(m{\gt}0\). Let \(A\) be a left-canonical irreducible MPS tensor with bond dimension \(D\), and suppose that the peripheral eigenvalues of its transfer map are exactly \(\{ z\in \mathbb {C}:z^m=1\} \). Then \(O_{AA}(mn)\longrightarrow m\).
Let \(E\) be an irreducible unital trace-preserving Schwarz map on \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) with a positive-definite adjoint fixed point. Then there exist \(m\geq 1\) and a primitive \(m\)-th root of unity \(\gamma \) such that \(m\mid D\) and the peripheral eigenvalues of \(E\) are exactly \(\{ 1,\gamma ,\gamma ^2,\ldots ,\gamma ^{m-1}\} \).
Let \(E\) be an irreducible unital Schwarz map on \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) with a positive-definite adjoint fixed point (trace-preservation is not required). Then there exist \(m \ge 1\) and a primitive \(m\)-th root of unity \(\gamma \) such that the peripheral eigenvalues of \(E\) are exactly \(\{ 1,\gamma ,\gamma ^2,\ldots ,\gamma ^{m-1}\} \).
For every positive time \(t\), a quantum dynamical semigroup irreducible at every positive time has the following property: every peripheral eigenvalue \(\mu \) of \(T_t\) admits a nonzero eigenvector \(V\) and a positive integer \(p\) such that \(T_t(V)=\mu V\) and \(T_{pt}(V)=V\).
If the set of peripheral eigenvalues of a linear endomorphism \(E\) on a finite-dimensional space is closed under powers (\(\mu \in \mathrm{peripheral}(E)\) and \(n\geq 1\) imply \(\mu ^n\in \mathrm{peripheral}(E)\)), then every peripheral eigenvalue is a root of unity.
Let \(E(X)=\sum _iK_iXK_i^\dagger \) be a Kraus map that is unital, and assume that the adjoint Kraus map \(E^*(X)=\sum _iK_i^\dagger XK_i\) has a positive definite fixed point and that \(E\) is irreducible. Then every peripheral eigenvalue of \(E\) is a root of unity.
For \(t \ge 0\),
where \(\Delta = L' - L\). This is [ Wol12 , Corollary 7.1 ] .
Let \(E:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be a positive linear map with \(D{\gt}0\), and assume that \(E(\sigma )\neq 0\) for every nonzero positive semidefinite matrix \(\sigma \). Then there are a nonzero positive semidefinite matrix \(\rho \) and a real number \(r{\gt}0\) such that \(E(\rho )=r\rho \).
Let \(E:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be a positive linear map with \(D{\gt}0\). Then there are a nonzero positive semidefinite matrix \(\rho \) and a real number \(r\geq 0\) such that
This is the eigenvector-existence part of [ Wol12 , Theorem 6.5 ] . It does not by itself identify \(r\) with the spectral radius.
Let \(A\) be an irreducible MPS tensor in unital gauge \(\sum _iA^i(A^i)^\dagger =\mathbb {1}\), with \(D{\gt}0\). Then there exist a unitary \(U\) and a diagonal positive definite \(\Lambda \) such that, for \(B^i:=U^\dagger A^iU\),
Moreover, \(A\) and \(B\) generate the same MPV family. This is the dual-map fixed-point and unitary-diagonalization step of [ PGVWC07 , Theorem 4 ] .
Let \(W\) be an unnormalized positive-length witness with positive weights \(a_k\). If some positive-length MPV coefficient of the original tensor is nonzero, then \(W\) has at least one block. For any nonempty witness, define
Then \(s{\gt}0\), every \(\nu _k\) is positive, \(|\nu _k|\le 1\), and \(|\nu _k|=1\) for at least one \(k\). For every \(N{\gt}0\),
Every MPS tensor has an unnormalized positive-length PGVWC07 witness. More precisely, the construction has four stages. First, a nonzero irreducible block remains irreducible under nonzero scalar rescaling and can be put in a unital gauge with scalar fixed-point space and a diagonal positive-definite dual fixed point. Second, this construction is applied to each member of a finite nonzero irreducible block family. Third, the nonzero irreducible decomposition of an arbitrary tensor supplies that family and the total bond-dimension bound. Finally, these blocks, weights, and fixed points form a witness in the sense of Definition 9.5.1.
Let \(A\) be a translation-invariant MPS representation of bond dimension \(D\). There is a positive scalar \(s\) and a finite family of blocks \(A_k\), possibly empty, such that the globally rescaled tensor \(s^{-1}A\) has the same MPV coefficients on every positive-length ring as \(\bigoplus _k \mu _k A_k^i\). The weights are positive and satisfy \(1\ge |\mu _k|\); if the family is nonempty, then some weight has norm \(1\). For each block,
Here \(\Lambda _k\) is diagonal, positive, and full-rank, and each block has positive bond dimension. Moreover, the only fixed points of \(\mathcal{E}_{A_k}(X)=\sum _i A_k^iX(A_k^i)^\dagger \) are the scalar multiples of \(\mathbb {1}\): for every \(X\), the identity \(\mathcal{E}_{A_k}(X)=X\) implies that there exists \(c\in \mathbb {C}\) such that \(X=c\mathbb {1}\). The total bond dimension of the decomposition is at most \(D\).
This is the positive-length form of [ PGVWC07 , Theorem 4 ] , with the global spectral-radius normalization step made explicit.
For every MPS tensor \(A\), one of the following alternatives holds:
\(V^{(N)}(A)_\sigma =0\) for every \(N{\gt}0\) and every word \(\sigma \);
there are a scalar \(s{\gt}0\) and a nonempty normalized block family satisfying all conclusions of Theorem 9.5.4.
Suppose that \(V^{(N)}(A)_\sigma \neq 0\) for some \(N{\gt}0\) and some word \(\sigma \). Then there are a scalar \(s{\gt}0\) and a nonempty finite family of positive-bond-dimension blocks \((A_k)_{k=1}^r\) with positive weights \((\mu _k)_{k=1}^r\) such that \(s^{-1}A\) and \(\bigoplus _k\mu _kA_k\) have identical MPV coefficients at every positive length. The weights satisfy \(|\mu _k|\le 1\), with equality for at least one block, and
for a diagonal positive-definite matrix \(\Lambda _k\). Every fixed point of \(\mathcal{E}_{A_k}\) is a scalar multiple of \(\mathbb {1}\), and \(\sum _k\dim (A_k)\le D\).
Under the hypotheses of Lemma 15.2.2.6, let \(m\ge 3(r-1)(L_0+1)+1\). Then
Lemma 15.2.2.6 also shows that the sums at lengths \(m\) and \(m+1\) are internal. This is the direct-sum lemma in the proof of [ PGVWC07 , Theorem 12, proof lines 1346–1456 ] .
This is Theorem 1 of [ PGWS\(^{+}\)08 ] . A pure finitely correlated state has physical string order if and only if there exist a unitary \(\widetilde u\ne \mathbb {1}\), a unitary virtual matrix \(V\), and physical indices \(n,m\) such that
The transfer criteria below assume one-site injectivity. The literal physical equivalence additionally requires that sufficiently long physical endpoint operators realize the needed virtual boundary matrices.
This is Theorem 2 of [ PGWS\(^{+}\)08 ] . For a pure finitely correlated state and a unitary \(u\ne \mathbb {1}\), the physical state is invariant under \(u^{\otimes N}\) on every \(N\)-site reduced density operator if and only if
The theorem below gives the corresponding virtual local-covariance criterion for a one-site-injective tensor. Passing between that condition and invariance of every physical reduced state is an additional step.
Let \(B\) be the one-letter, one-dimensional tensor \(B^0=(1)\), and form two block-diagonal copies with phases \(1\) and \(-1\):
The representative \(B\) is in the square-root fixed-point form, and both copy coefficients have unit modulus. Thus \(A\) satisfies the literal virtual block-diagonal reading of the displayed repeated-copy formula in [ CPGSV16 , Section 3 ] . It does not, however, satisfy the accompanying interpretation in which the copy index also belongs to the physical direct sum: there is no scalar \(v\) such that \((A^0)^2=vA^0\). In particular, \(A\) is not a renormalization fixed point in the sense of Definition 24.1.2.
Under the canonical identifications of one-site configurations with physical indices and two-site configurations with pairs of physical indices,
If an MPO tensor \(M\) is the ancilla contraction of a pure-state renormalization fixed point, then its physical-trace transfer \(\mathcal T_M=\sum _i M^{ii}\) is idempotent: \(\mathcal T_M\mathcal T_M=\mathcal T_M\).
Suppose there exists an isometry \(V\colon \mathbb {C}^d\to \mathbb {C}^{d^2}\), written as coefficients \(V_{(i_1,i_2),j}\), such that
for all \(i_1,i_2\in \{ 0,\ldots ,d-1\} \). Then \(\mathcal{E}_A^2=\mathcal{E}_A\).
For any \(A, B, X \in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\),
Each of the four summands on the right is a single-Kraus CP map, so every sesquilinear sandwich decomposes into a signed complex linear combination of CP maps.
Let \(A\) be an irreducible MPS tensor with \(D {\gt} 0\) and some \(A^i \neq 0\). Then there exist a positive definite matrix \(\sigma \) and a positive real \(r {\gt} 0\) such that \(\mathcal{E}_A^\dagger (\sigma ) = r\sigma \).
This combines the eigenvector-existence part of [ Wol12 , Theorem 6.5 ] with the irreducible upgrade to positive definiteness ( [ Wol12 , Theorem 6.3(2) ] ); the application to the adjoint transfer map follows [ CPGSV16 , Appendix A ] .
Let \(I\) and \(J\) be finite index sets, and let \(X\in \mathbb {C}^{(I\times J)\times (I\times J)}\) be positive definite. If \(I\) is nonempty, then the matrix with entries \((\operatorname{tr}_I X)_{j,j'}=\sum _{i\in I}X_{(i,j),(i,j')}\) is positive definite.
Let \(I\) and \(J\) be finite index sets, and let \(X\in \mathbb {C}^{(I\times J)\times (I\times J)}\) be positive definite. If \(J\) is nonempty, then the matrix with entries \((\operatorname{tr}_J X)_{i,i'}=\sum _{j\in J}X_{(i,j),(i',j)}\) is positive definite.
Let \(\mathcal A=\bigoplus _{\alpha \in I}\mathcal M_{d_\alpha \times d_\alpha }\) be a finite sum of full matrix algebras, with total trace \(\operatorname{tr}_{\mathcal A}(X)=\sum _{\alpha \in I}\operatorname{tr}(X_\alpha )\). Let \(F:\mathcal A\to \mathcal A\) be positive and trace nonincreasing. Suppose that \(F(V_j)=V_j\) for every \(j\in J\). With \(\mathcal V=\operatorname{span}_{\mathbb {C}}\{ V_j:j\in J\} \), put
If \(\mathbf1_{\mathcal A}\in C_L(\mathcal V)\) for some \(L{\gt}0\), then \(F\) preserves the total trace on \(\mathcal A\).
Let \(f : M_{D}(\mathbb {C}) \to \mathbb {C}\) be a complex-linear functional, where \(D{\gt}0\). If \(f(X) \geq 0\) for every \(X \geq 0\) and \(f(\mathbb {1})=1\), then there is a density matrix \(\rho \in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) such that \(f(X) = \operatorname{tr}(\rho X)\) for every \(X \in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\).
Let \(P\) be an auxiliary BNT sector decomposition and \(A=\bigoplus _j A_j\). Assume that every non-idempotent block \(\mathcal{E}_j^2\ne \mathcal{E}_j\) has matrices \(r_j,l_j\) and a scalar \(\lambda _j\) satisfying the five spectral conditions in Theorem 24.2.20. Then
The spectral-pair hypothesis is assumed explicitly.
Let \(P\) and \(A=\bigoplus _j A_j\) satisfy the multiplicity-one unit-weight hypotheses of Theorem 24.2.21, including its normalized nonzero subleading spectral pair for every non-idempotent block. If \(A\) has positive-gap BNT zero correlation length, then for every \(N{\gt}2\) its translated two-site parent interactions satisfy all three ground-space conditions:
This is only the conditional corrected implication from (ii) to (iii) of [ CPGSV16 , Theorem 3.10 ] , not a three-way equivalence.
Let \(P\) be an auxiliary BNT sector decomposition and \(A=\bigoplus _j A_j\). If \(A\) has positive-gap BNT zero correlation length, then \(\mathcal{E}_A^2=\mathcal{E}_A\).
Let \(\mathcal M\) be a finite full matrix algebra over \(\mathbb C\), and let \(F:\mathcal M\to \mathcal M\) be positive and trace nonincreasing. Suppose that a family \((V_j)_{j\in J}\) consists of fixed points of \(F\) and that, for some \(L{\gt}0\), the identity belongs to the linear span of the products \(V_{j_1}\cdots V_{j_L}\) in \(\mathcal M\). Then \(F\) has a positive-definite fixed point. This is the local full-matrix intermediate implication used in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.4, lines 1980–1995 ] ; it is not stated there as a separate theorem.
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be positive with \(T(\mathbb {1})\le \mathbb {1}\). If \(a\le 0\le b\) and \(a\mathbb {1}\le A\le b\mathbb {1}\), then
This is the matrix form of [ Wol12 , Equation (5.21) ] .
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be positive with \(T(\mathbb {1})\le \mathbb {1}\), and let \(A\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be Hermitian. If \(\operatorname{spec}(A)\subseteq [a,b]\) with \(a\le 0\le b\), then
This is [ Wol12 , Equation (5.21) ] .
Let \(\mathcal M\) be a finite full matrix algebra over \(\mathbb C\), and let \(F:\mathcal M\to \mathcal M\) be positive and trace nonincreasing. Suppose that \(F(V_j)=V_j\) for every \(j\in J\). Put \(\mathcal V=\operatorname{span}_{\mathbb {C}}\{ V_j:j\in J\} \) and, in the notation of [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.4 ] , define
If \(\mathbf1\in C_L(\mathcal V)\) for some \(L{\gt}0\), then \(F\) is trace preserving.
Let \(M\ne 0\). If \(c_1,c_2\ne 0\) and both \(c_1M\) and \(c_2M\) are positive semidefinite, then \(c_1=t c_2\) for some positive real number \(t\). Every complex scalar of unit modulus is nonzero. In particular, every nonzero scalar \(c\) has a unit-modulus part \(u=c/|c|\), positivity of \(cM\) implies positivity of \(uM\), and there is at most one such unit scalar when \(M\ne 0\).
Let \(S\subseteq M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be a unital \(*\)-subalgebra, and let \(E:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be a positive complex-linear map whose image lies in \(S\) and whose restriction to \(S\) is the identity. There are positive integers \(d_k,m_k\), a unitary \(U\), and density matrices \(\rho _k\in M_{m_k}(\mathbb {C})\) such that
and, for every \(A\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\),
Equivalently, cyclicity of the partial trace permits the factor \(\rho _k\otimes \mathbb {1}_{d_k}\) to be placed on the right of \((U^*AU)_{kk}\). This is [ Wol12 , Proposition 1.5 and Equation (1.40) ] .
Let \(m,d{\gt}0\), and let \(E:M_{md}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{md}(\mathbb {C})\) be a positive complex-linear map. Suppose that the image of \(E\) is contained in \(\mathbb {1}_m\otimes M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\) and that \(E(\mathbb {1}_m\otimes X)=\mathbb {1}_m\otimes X\) for every \(X\in M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\). Then there is a density matrix \(\rho \in M_{m}(\mathbb {C})\) such that, for every \(A\in M_{md}(\mathbb {C})\),
This is the one-factor case of [ Wol12 , Proposition 1.5 and Equation (1.40) ] .
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be positive and trace nonincreasing. Then the forward orbit \(\{ T^n(X):n\geq 0\} \) is bounded for every \(X\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\). This is the trace-nonincreasing form of [ Wol12 , Proposition 6.3 ] .
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be positive and trace-preserving. Then \(T\) has bounded orbits, and its mean-ergodic projection \(P_T\) is positive and trace-preserving. Its range is precisely the fixed-point space of \(T\):
If \(T(\mathbb {1})=\mathbb {1}\), then \(P_T(\mathbb {1})=\mathbb {1}\). This is the Cesàro projection \(T_\infty \) of [ Wol12 , Proposition 6.3 and Equation (6.14) ] .
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be positive and trace-preserving. The trace adjoint \(P_T^*\) of its mean-ergodic projection is positive, unital, and idempotent. It is a retraction onto the adjoint fixed-point space:
and \(P_T^*(Y)=Y\) if and only if \(T^*(Y)=Y\). This is the adjoint projection used in the proof of [ Wol12 , Theorem 6.14 ] .
Suppose \(p_j{\gt}0\) and \(L_j\leq R_j\) for every \(j\). If \(\sum _jp_jL_j=\sum _jp_jR_j\), then \(L_j=R_j\) for every \(j\). This is the positivity argument applied to strong subadditivity in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1770–1780 ] .
Let \(P\) be a BNT canonical form with basis representatives \((A_j)_{j=0}^{g-1}\), and suppose that the representatives have already been blocked so that every \(A_j\) is injective. Then representative word-tuple separation holds at every length \(L\geq 6(g-1)+1\). Consequently, if the first-site actions of \(Y,Z\in M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\) agree on the positive-length MPV family of the tensor represented by \(P\), then \(YA_j=ZA_j\) for \(0\leq j{\lt}g\). The same conclusion holds when the first-site equality is given for any tensor with the same positive-length MPV family as the tensor represented by \(P\).
More generally, let \(P\) be a BNT canonical form before physical blocking, let \(p{\gt}0\), and suppose that every \(p\)-blocked representative \(A_j^{[p]}\) is injective. Then the blocked sector decomposition \(P^{[p]}\) has representative word-tuple separation at every blocked length \(L\geq 6(g-1)+1\).
Without changing the physical alphabet, a BNT canonical form also has eventual representative word-tuple separation. If \(p{\gt}0\) is a common block-injectivity length, then one may take pairwise separating words of length \(6p\), form selectors of length \(6p(g-1)\), and append homogeneous words of any length at least \(p\).
Finally, the BNT canonical-form hypotheses imply that there is a common \(L{\gt}0\) for which every unblocked representative \(A_j\) is \(L\)-block injective. Indeed, irreducibility and left-canonicality give a finite peripheral period \(m_j\). The self-overlap tends to \(m_j\) along multiples of \(m_j\), but by normalization it also tends to \(1\); hence \(m_j=1\). Thus every representative is normal, and finiteness gives a common positive block-injectivity length. If the first-site actions of \(Y,Z\) agree on the tensor represented by \(P\), then \(YA_j=ZA_j\) for \(0\leq j{\lt}g\). The same conclusion holds when the first-site equality is given for any tensor with the same positive-length MPV family. This composes the blocking conclusion of [ CPGSV16 , lines 318–345 ] with Appendix C.3, Lemma L [ CPGSV16 , lines 1835–1858 ] .
No additional common-length hypothesis is required.
- MPSTensor.IsBNTCanonicalForm.eventuallyRepresentativeWordTupleSpan_of_basis_injective
- MPSTensor.IsBNTCanonicalForm.eventuallyRepresentativeWordTupleSpan_blockTensor
- MPSTensor.IsBNTCanonicalForm.eventuallyRepresentativeWordTupleSpan
- MPSTensor.pairTraceSeparatingAt_blockTensor
- MPSTensor.IsBNTCanonicalForm.insertedTensor_basis_eq_of_firstSiteActionAgree_of_basis_injective
- MPSTensor.IsBNTCanonicalForm.insertedTensor_basis_eq_of_sameMPV₂Pos_firstSiteActionAgree_of_basis_injective
- MPSTensor.IsBNTCanonicalForm.insertedTensor_basis_eq_of_firstSiteActionAgree_of_common_blockInjective
- MPSTensor.IsBNTCanonicalForm.insertedTensor_basis_eq_of_sameMPV₂Pos_firstSiteActionAgree_of_common_blockInjective
- MPSTensor.IsBNTCanonicalForm.exists_common_basis_isNBlkInjective
- MPSTensor.IsBNTCanonicalForm.insertedTensor_basis_eq_of_firstSiteActionAgree
- MPSTensor.IsBNTCanonicalForm.insertedTensor_basis_eq_of_sameMPV₂Pos_firstSiteActionAgree
Let \(A\) be an MPS tensor. Then there is a blocking length \(p\ge 1\), nonzero weights \(\mu _k\), and blocks \(B_k\) over the \(p\)-blocked alphabet such that:
each block has positive bond dimension;
each block is trace-preserving, primitive, tensor-irreducible, and one-site injective;
\(A^{[p]}\) and \(\bigoplus _k \mu _k B_k\) generate the same MPV family at every positive length.
No weight-modulus normalization is asserted at this stage.
Let \(X\) and \(Y\) be trace-preserving, primitive, irreducible NTs of positive bond dimensions \(D_X\) and \(D_Y\). If their MPV families differ by a nonzero scalar power, then \(D_X=D_Y\), and after identifying the bond spaces there exist \(G\in \mathrm{GL}_{D_Y}(\mathbb {C})\) and \(\zeta \in \mathbb {C}\setminus \{ 0\} \) such that, for every physical index \(i\), \(Y^i=\zeta G X^i G^{-1}\). The scalar is not asserted to be positive, and the gauge is not asserted to be unitary.
Let \(\mathcal{E}\) be a finite-dimensional completely positive map. Then \(\mathcal{E}\) is primitive if and only if its Frobenius adjoint \(\mathcal{E}^\dagger \) is primitive. Equivalently, the eigenvalues \(\lambda \) of \(\mathcal{E}\) with \(|\lambda |=1\) form the singleton \(\{ 1\} \) if and only if the same holds for \(\mathcal{E}^\dagger \), because adjunction sends every eigenvalue to its complex conjugate.
Let \(E:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be trace-preserving, and let \(\rho \neq 0\) satisfy \(E(\rho )=\rho \) and \(\operatorname{tr}(\rho )\neq 0\). Let \(P\) be the fixed-point projection associated to \(\rho \), as defined in (??). Assume that:
\(E\) is primitive;
every eigenvalue \(\mu \) of \(E\) satisfies \(|\mu |\le 1\);
whenever \(E(X)=X\) and \(\operatorname{tr}(X)=0\), one has \(X=0\).
Then every eigenvalue \(\nu \) of \(E-P\) satisfies \(|\nu |{\lt}1\).
Let \(A\) be a normalized MPS tensor with a nonzero PSD fixed point \(\rho \) of the transfer map. If \(\rho _{\operatorname{spec}}(\mathcal{E}_A-P){\lt}1\), where \(P\) is the fixed-point projection, then \(O_{AA}(N)\to 1\) as \(N\to \infty \).
For the convention that an \(L\)-site interaction is zero when \(L{\gt}N\), the two-site parent Hamiltonian on a one-site periodic chain satisfies
This convention is local to the present development. The two-site terms in [ Bei12 , Section III ] , source lines 451–514, are not assigned an action when both site labels denote the same site. The nearest-neighbor condition in [ CPGSV16 , Theorem 3.10(iii) ] , source lines 534–540, only concerns \(N{\gt}2\).
Suppose \(A\) has invariant-projector closure and no nontrivial \(p\)-periodic vectors. Then there are normal tensors \(A_1,\ldots ,A_r\) of positive bond dimensions \(D_1,\ldots ,D_r\), with \(\sum _kD_k\le D\), and nonzero weights \(\mu _1,\ldots ,\mu _r\) such that
Moreover, there are isometries \(V_k:\mathbb {C}^{D_k}\to \mathbb {C}^D\) with pairwise orthogonal ranges such that
This is the sufficient condition for canonical form of [ CPGSV16 , Section 2 ] , with that paper’s convention \(\sum _kD_k\le D\) allowing zero blocks: a corner of \(A\) carrying the zero tensor cannot be rescaled to spectral radius one and is omitted because it vanishes at every positive length.
Suppose \(A\) has invariant-projector closure. Then there are isometries \(V_1,\ldots ,V_r\) with \(V_k^\dagger V_k=\mathbb {1}\), pairwise orthogonal ranges, and \(\sum _kV_kV_k^\dagger =\mathbb {1}\), such that \(A^iV_k=V_kA_k^i\) for the corner tensors \(A_k^i=V_k^\dagger A^iV_k\), every corner tensor \(A_k\) is irreducible, and \(\mathcal{V}(A)=\mathcal{V}(\bigoplus _{k=1}^rA_k)\).
Let \(H\geq 0\), let \(p\geq 1\), and let \(Q\) satisfy \(QH^p=H^pQ\). Then \(QH=HQ\). In particular, a matrix commuting with a nonzero power of a nonempty-chain density operator generated by an MPDO commutes with the density operator itself. This is the final operator implication in the periodic-sector contradiction in the proof of [ CPGSV16 , Proposition 4.13 ] .
Let \(E\) be an irreducible completely positive map on \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\). Suppose \(\rho \neq 0\) and \(\rho ,\sigma \geq 0\) satisfy \(E(\rho )=r\rho \) and \(E(\sigma )=r\sigma \) for a real number \(r{\gt}0\). Then \(\sigma =c\rho \) for some \(c\in \mathbb {C}\). This is the completely positive specialization of the positive-eigenvector uniqueness in [ Wol12 , Theorem 6.3(2–3) ] .
Let \(T\) be a finite real square matrix. Assume that \(T\) is primitive, positive semidefinite, normalized by \(\operatorname{tr}(T)=1\), and has constant traces on all positive powers. Then \(T=ab^\top \) for some vectors \(a\) and \(b\), with \(a\cdot b=1\).
If two pure-state ensembles \(\{ \psi _i\} _{i \in \iota _1}\) and \(\{ \phi _j\} _{j \in \iota _2}\) are related by an isometric mixing matrix \(V \in \mathbb {C}^{\iota _1 \times \iota _2}\) with \(V^\dagger V = \mathbb {1}\) and \(\psi _i = \sum _j V_{ij} \phi _j\), then they induce the same pure-ensemble density operator. This is the sufficient direction of the Hughston–Jozsa–Wootters theorem; the converse is Theorem 18.3.6.
Suppose that \(M\) is the ancillary contraction of a fixed spin–ancilla tensor \(A\) through a bond identification \(e\):
Then the purification tensor \(\widehat A\) is a pure-state renormalization fixed point if and only if \(\mathcal T_M^2=\mathcal T_M\). This is the normalized tensor-level equivalence underlying the purification theorem in [ CPGSV16 , lines 744–786 ] .
Under the hypotheses of Theorem 8.1.1.7, paper primitivity implies
Proposition 1 of [ SPGWC10 ] states this inequality for every quantum channel; the present theorem records its specialization under normalization and paper primitivity.
For a quantum dynamical semigroup \(T_t=e^{tL}\),
This is [ Wol12 , Proposition 7.5 ] .
Assume \(D \ge 1\). Let \(A\) be an injective MPS tensor with \(\sum _i (A^i)^\dagger A^i = \mathbb {1}\). Then the transfer map \(\mathcal{E}_A\) has a unique positive semidefinite fixed point \(\rho \) up to scaling, and \(\rho \) is positive definite.
Assume \(D\ge 1\). Let \(A\) be an MPS tensor such that its transfer map is irreducible and \(\sum _i (A^i)^\dagger A^i=\mathbb {1}\), so that \(\mathcal{E}_A\) is trace-preserving. Then \(\mathcal{E}_A\) has a unique positive definite fixed point, up to scalar multiple.
Suppose that \(C\simeq C'\otimes E\) and
is a quantum Markov decomposition on \(B\). Then the marginal \(\rho _{ABC'}=\operatorname{tr}_E(\rho _{ABC})\) has the decomposition
Assume \(D{\gt}0\) and \(k\le D\). A linear map \(T:M_{D,D}(\mathbb {C})(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D,D}(\mathbb {C})(\mathbb {C})\) is \(k\)-positive if and only if, for every Hermitian projection \(P\in M_{D,D}(\mathbb {C})(\mathbb {C})\) of rank \(k\), \(R_P\tau R_P^\dagger \geq 0\), where \(\tau \) is the Choi matrix of \(T\). This is the rank-\(k\) projection formulation of [ Wol12 , Chapter 3, Proposition 3.1 ] .
Assume \(D{\gt}0\) and \(k\le D\). Let \(T:M_{D,D}(\mathbb {C})(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D,D}(\mathbb {C})(\mathbb {C})\) have Choi matrix \(\tau \). Suppose that \(R_P\tau R_P^\dagger \geq 0\) for every Hermitian projection \(P\in M_{D,D}(\mathbb {C})(\mathbb {C})\) of rank \(k\). Then \(T\) is \(k\)-positive.
Assume \(D{\gt}0\). Let \(T:M_{D,D}(\mathbb {C})(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D,D}(\mathbb {C})(\mathbb {C})\) be \(k\)-positive, with Choi matrix \(\tau \). If \(P\in M_{D,D}(\mathbb {C})(\mathbb {C})\) is Hermitian, satisfies \(P^2=P\), and has rank \(k\), then \(R_P\tau R_P^\dagger \geq 0\). This is the forward rank-\(k\) projection-compression direction of [ Wol12 , Chapter 3, Proposition 3.1 ] .
Let \(D{\gt}0\), suppose \(\sum _i(A^i)^\dagger A^i=\mathbb {1}\), and assume that \(A\) is primitive in the sense of Definition 8.1.1.3. Suppose \(A^{i_0}\) is not invertible and \(A^{i_0}\varphi =\mu \varphi \) with \(\varphi \neq 0\) and \(\mu \neq 0\). Then, for every \(\psi \in \mathbb {C}^D\),
This is the quantitative rank-one conclusion of [ SPGWC10 , Lemma 2(b) ] .
Suppose \(A\) has bond dimension \(D{\gt}0\), is normal, and \(N_0\ge 1\) with \(S_{N_0}(A)=M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\). Then there exist words \(\sigma _0,\tau _0\) of length \(N_0\), nonzero vectors \(\varphi ,\psi \), nonzero scalars \(\mu ,\nu \), and \(m\in \mathbb {N}\) such that:
\(A^{\sigma _0}\varphi =\mu \varphi \),
\((A^{\tau _0})^T\psi =\nu \psi \),
\(\varphi \psi ^T\in S_m(A^{[N_0]})\).
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be complex-linear. Suppose that for every \(v\in \mathbb {C}^D\) there is a scalar \(c_v\in \mathbb {C}\) such that \(T(|v\rangle \! \langle v|)=c_v|v\rangle \! \langle v|\). Then there is a scalar \(c\in \mathbb {C}\) such that \(T=c\, \operatorname{id}\).
Let \(A\) and \(B\) be injective tensors of bond dimensions \(D_1\) and \(D_2\). If there are \(X\in M_{D_1\times D_2}(\mathbb {C})\setminus \{ 0\} \) and \(\mu \in \mathbb {C}\) such that, for every physical index \(i\),
then \(D_1=D_2\).
Let \(A\) be \(L_0\)-block-injective with \(L_0{\gt}0\) and \(D\ge 1\). Suppose \(\psi \in \mathcal G_{N,L}(A)\), \(N\ge 2\), \(L_0{\lt}L\le N\), and \(\psi =\Gamma _N(X)\) for a boundary matrix \(X\). Then there are two families of boundary matrices \(Y^+_\tau \) and \(Y^-_\tau \), indexed by fixed complement values \(\tau \), such that, for every physical letter \(j\),
Here \(C^+_\tau \) and \(C^-_\tau \) are the complementary words exposed by the two boundary-crossing cyclic intervals, both of reduced length \(L_0+1\).
Let \(n\ge 1\) and let \(\rho \) be a bipartite matrix, with \(\rho ^{F}\) its image under the factor swap \(\rho ^{F}_{(i_2,i_1),(j_2,j_1)}=\rho _{(i_1,i_2),(j_1,j_2)}\). If \((T_n\otimes \operatorname{id})(\rho )\ge 0\) then \(n\, \mathbb {1}\otimes \rho _2\ge \rho \), and if \((T_n\otimes \operatorname{id})(\rho ^{F})\ge 0\) then \(n\, \rho _1\otimes \mathbb {1}\ge \rho \), where \(\rho _1\) and \(\rho _2\) are the reduced densities of \(\rho \) on the first and second factors. Because the factor swap is a unitary reindexing, \((\operatorname{id}\otimes T_n)(\rho )\ge 0 \iff (T_n\otimes \operatorname{id})(\rho ^{F})\ge 0\), so the second hypothesis is Wolf’s symmetric condition \((\operatorname{id}\otimes T_n)(\rho )\ge 0\) expressed through the swap.
This is the second step of Wolf’s two-step argument for [ Wol12 , Equation (3.18) ] . The source states the inequalities under the premise that \(\rho \) has Schmidt number at most \(n\), and reaches \((T_n\otimes \operatorname{id})(\rho )\ge 0\) from that premise by the \(n\)-positivity of \(T_n\); that first step is taken here as the hypothesis rather than derived. The first step and the composed full criterion with the Schmidt-number premise are Theorem 22.13.11.
On a general bipartite system \(M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\otimes M_{d'}(\mathbb {C})\), a state of Schmidt number at most \(n\) satisfies the reduction criterion
with \(\rho _1\) and \(\rho _2\) the reduced densities on the first and second factors. No relation is imposed between \(d\) and \(d'\); each inequality carries only the \(n\)-positivity threshold of \(T_n\) on its acting factor.
For positive definite matrices \(\rho ,\sigma \) and a positive definite matrix \(\tau \) of unit trace,
Let \(\rho \) and \(\sigma \) be positive semidefinite matrices such that \(\ker \sigma \subseteq \ker \rho \), and let \(\tau \) be positive semidefinite with \(\operatorname{tr}\tau =1\). Then
For positive definite matrices \(\rho ,\sigma \) on a tensor product of a system factor and an ancilla factor,
where \(\operatorname{tr}_C\) is the partial trace over the ancilla factor. This is the positive-definite base case; the source inequality on the support domain \(\ker \sigma \subseteq \ker \rho \) is Theorem 21.2.34.
For positive semidefinite \(\rho ,\sigma \) on a tensor product of a system factor and an ancilla factor of dimension \(d_C\), with the support condition \(\ker \sigma \subseteq \ker \rho \),
where \(\operatorname{tr}_C\) is the partial trace over the ancilla factor.
Let \(A\) and \(B\) be Hermitian matrices of the same size, with spectral resolutions
Write \(w_{ij}=\langle u_i,v_j\rangle \), and use the total real logarithm: \(\log 0=0\), while \(\log x=\log |x|\) for \(x{\lt}0\). Then
This is an algebraic totalized extension to arbitrary Hermitian matrices of the homogeneous trace-log identity \((\mathrm{J1})\), which Jenčová–Ruskai state for strictly positive matrices in arXiv:0903.2895v4, lines 277–287.
For every positive semidefinite operator \(\omega _{XY}\),
No invertibility assumption is made on either marginal. This is [ HJPW04 , Equation (4) ] .
Let \(A\) and \(B\) be positive definite, with spectral resolutions \(A=\sum _i\alpha _i|u_i\rangle \! \langle u_i|\) and \(B=\sum _j\beta _j|v_j\rangle \! \langle v_j|\). Put \(w_{ij}=\langle u_i,v_j\rangle \). Let \(L_A\) and \(R_B\) denote left and right multiplication, \(L_A(X)=AX\) and \(R_B(X)=XB\). Then, for \(t{\gt}0\),
Both quadratic forms are continuous on \((0,\infty )\). Moreover,
and the integrand in (??) is continuous and integrable on the positive half-line. This is the positive-definite spectral route of Jenčová–Ruskai, arXiv:0903.2895v4, §4.
- Matrix.sourceAResolventQuadratic
- Matrix.sourceBResolventQuadratic
- Matrix.leftRight_mulVec_vec_transpose
- Matrix.sourceA_resolvent_quadratic_spectral
- Matrix.sourceB_resolvent_quadratic_spectral
- Matrix.sourceAResolventQuadratic_continuousOn
- Matrix.sourceBResolventQuadratic_continuousOn
- Matrix.quantumRelativeEntropy_posDef_spectral
- Matrix.relativeEntropyResolventIntegrand
- Matrix.relativeEntropyResolventIntegrand_integrableOn
- Matrix.relativeEntropyResolventIntegrand_continuousOn
- Matrix.quantumRelativeEntropy_resolvent_integral
Let \(A\) and \(B\) be positive semidefinite matrices of the same size, let \(P_B\) be the orthogonal projection onto the support of \(B\), and, for \(t{\gt}0\), set
Write \(S_t^+\) for the generalized inverse that vanishes on \(\ker S_t\). Define
With the spectral notation of Theorem 21.4.15,
Consequently,
The function in (??) is continuous on \((0,\infty )\). If \(\ker B\subseteq \ker A\), then \(A P_B=A\), so \(Q_{A P_B}(t)\) equals the quadratic form with source \(\operatorname{vec}(A^{\top })\).
This is the support-projected form of \((\mathrm{intAB})\) in Jenčová–Ruskai, arXiv:0903.2895v4, §2.1, lines 423–427, with the support convention at lines 717–720.
- Matrix.PosSemidef.supportInv
- Matrix.supportLeftRightSuperoperator
- Matrix.supportSourceAQuadratic
- Matrix.rawSupportSourceAQuadratic
- Matrix.supportSourceBQuadratic
- Matrix.supportRelativeEntropyLeftRightIntegrand
- Matrix.supportSourceAQuadratic_spectral
- Matrix.supportSourceBQuadratic_spectral
- Matrix.supportRelativeEntropyLeftRightIntegrand_eq_spectral
- Matrix.supportSourceAQuadratic_eq_raw_of_kernel_le
- Matrix.rawSupportSourceAQuadratic_sub_trace_add_sourceB_eq_spectral
- Matrix.supportRelativeEntropyLeftRightIntegrand_continuousOn
Let \(A\) and \(B\) be positive semidefinite matrices of the same size and suppose that \(\ker B\subseteq \ker A\). With the spectral notation of Theorem 21.4.14, define, for \(t{\gt}0\),
Thus no ordinary quotient with \(\alpha _i=\beta _j=0\) is used. Define also
The function \(I_{A,B}\) is integrable on \((0,\infty )\), and
The trace-log identity \((\mathrm{J1})\), the scalar normalization \((\mathrm{intspec})\), and its matrix form \((\mathrm{intAB})\) occur in Jenčová–Ruskai, arXiv:0903.2895v4, at lines 277–287, 406–413, and 423–427, respectively. The support-domain extension is given at lines 717–720.
This theorem concerns the spectral expression \(I_{A,B}\). The next theorem identifies it with the coordinate-free left-right quadratic form underlying the finite Weyl formula.
For Hermitian matrices \(\rho ,\sigma \) and a unitary \(U\),
Let \(\rho \) and \(\sigma \) be positive semidefinite matrices on \(\mathcal{H}_S\otimes \mathbb {C}^{d_C}\) such that \(\ker \sigma \subseteq \ker \rho \), and suppose that \(D(\rho \Vert \sigma )=D(\operatorname{tr}_C\rho \Vert \operatorname{tr}_C\sigma )\). For a primitive \(d_C\)-th root of unity, put \(U_{ab}=\mathbb {1}_S\otimes W(a,b)\) and
Then, for every \(a,b\),
This is a scalar equality-propagation prerequisite for [ HJPW04 , Theorem 3 and equation (8) ] ; it neither characterizes equality in joint convexity nor asserts recovery.
Let \(\rho \) and \(\sigma \) be positive semidefinite matrices on \(\mathcal{H}_S\otimes \mathbb {C}^{d_C}\) such that \(\ker \sigma \subseteq \ker \rho \), and suppose that \(D(\rho \Vert \sigma )=D(\operatorname{tr}_C\rho \Vert \operatorname{tr}_C\sigma )\). For a primitive \(d_C\)-th root of unity, put \(U_{ce}=\mathbb {1}_S\otimes W(c,e)\) and
Then
This scalar identity is associated with the finite Jensen step in the Weyl proof of data processing. It is a prerequisite for [ HJPW04 , Theorem 3 and equation (8) ] ; it neither characterizes equality in joint convexity nor asserts recovery.
Let \(A_{\mathrm{tot}}\) be the tensor of a sector decomposition with basis representatives \((A_j)_{j=0}^{g-1}\), multiplicities \(r_j{\gt}0\), nonzero weights \(\mu _{j,q}\), and grouped coefficients \(c_j^{(N)}=\sum _{q=0}^{r_j-1}\mu _{j,q}^{N}\). Suppose that the first-site actions of \(Y,Z\in M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\) agree on the MPV family of \(A_{\mathrm{tot}}\). If representative word-tuple separation holds at length \(L\) and \(c_{j_0}^{(L+1)}\neq 0\), then \(YA_{j_0}=ZA_{j_0}\). Consequently, under eventual representative word-tuple separation, \(YA_j=ZA_j\) for every representative \(j\). The same conclusion holds if the first-site equality is initially given for any tensor with the same positive-length MPV family as \(A_{\mathrm{tot}}\).
The representative grouping is the argument of [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.3, lines 1835–1858 ] .
In the first auxiliary assertion, eventual representative word-tuple separation is an explicit assumption. The later post-blocked theorem derives the needed finite representative separation from the full BNT canonical-form hypotheses. The sharp \(3D^5\) representative-separation bound is Theorem 10.6.1.17; its detailed source comparison is recorded in docs/paper-gaps/cpgsv17_bicf_block_separation.tex.
Let \((C_j^s)\) and \((E_j^s)\) be two marked families over the same sector decomposition. Suppose that, for every marked index \(s\) and every unmarked word \(w\),
If representative word-tuple separation holds at length \(L\) and \(c_{j_0}^{(L+1)}\neq 0\), then \(C_{j_0}=E_{j_0}\). Under eventual representative word-tuple separation, one has \(C_j=E_j\) for every \(j\).
Lemma L is stated for marks induced by physical operators on the first site. After its closed-chain identity has been expanded, the separation calculation uses only the matrices in the marked slot. The theorem is the resulting algebraic extension of [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.3, lines 1848–1858 ] ; it is not attributed to the paper as a separately stated arbitrary-mark theorem.
Let \(M\) be in normalized BNT-refined horizontal form. For doubled-index matrices \(Y,Z\), suppose that \(Y_1V^{(N)}(M)=Z_1V^{(N)}(M)\) for every \(N\geq 1\). Then the corresponding inserted tensors agree on the original bond space, \(YM=ZM\).
Now suppose in addition that \(M\) generates an MPDO, \(Q=Q^\dagger \), and that \(Q\widetilde M=Q\widetilde M Q\) on the vertically viewed tensor. Then, on every representative, the insertions corresponding to \(\widetilde M Q\) and \(Q\widetilde M Q\) agree: \(Y_R(Q)A_j=Y_C(Q)A_j\) for \(0\leq j{\lt}g\). This equality extends through every repeated weighted sector and the direct sum of the copy gauges, so that the original MPO tensor satisfies \(\widetilde M Q=Q\widetilde M Q\). The specialized assertion follows from the two entrywise identities \(Q_1H^{(N)}=Q_1H^{(N)}Q_1\) and \(Q_1H^{(N)}=H^{(N)}Q_1\) at every positive length.
The corresponding literal-CF assertion also holds. Let \(A\) be in literal CPSV canonical form. If the first-site actions of \(Y,Z\in M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\) agree on every positive-length matrix product vector of \(A\), then
on the original bond space. In particular, suppose that \(M\) generates matrix product density operators, \(P=P^\dagger \), and \(P\widetilde M=P\widetilde MP\). Positivity gives agreement of the first-site actions associated with \(\widetilde MP\) and \(P\widetilde MP\) at every positive length. Hence (??) gives the opposite one-sided identity on the original bond space.
This is the representative-indexed conclusion of the invariant-projection step in [ CPGSV16 , Proposition 4.13, lines 1873–1887 ] . Copies with a common normal representative are grouped before separation, exactly as in Appendix C.3, Lemma L. The source assumes that \(Q\) is an orthogonal projector; this implication only uses its Hermiticity.
- MPSTensor.FirstSiteActionAgree.of_sameMPVPos
- MPSTensor.insertedTensor_toTensorFromBlocks
- MPSTensor.SectorDecomposition.insertedTensor_toTensor_eq_of_basis
- MPSTensor.insertedTensor_eq_of_gauge
- MPOTensor.IsHorizontalCF.insertedTensor_eq_of_firstSiteActionAgree
- MPSTensor.CPSVCanonicalFormData.ActiveBNTRefinement.insertedTensor_eq_of_firstSiteActionAgree
- MPSTensor.IsCPSVCanonicalForm.insertedTensor_eq_of_firstSiteActionAgree
- MPOTensor.firstSiteActionAgree_braRight_ketLeftBraRight_of_invariant
- MPOTensor.representative_opposite_insert_eq_of_rotated_mpo_entries
- MPOTensor.representative_braRight_eq_ketLeftBraRight_of_invariant
- MPOTensor.IsHorizontalCF.exists_representative_braRight_eq_ketLeftBraRight
- MPOTensor.IsHorizontalCF.braRight_eq_ketLeftBraRight_of_invariant
The common physical map is an isometry, \(V^*V=1\). Moreover, the equal-sector bond embedding and the physical support projector satisfy
and \(P_{2,\mathrm{res}} = 1-q_2\! \left(\bigoplus _j B_j\right)\). If the \(B_j\) form a basis of normal tensors and their direct sum is a renormalization fixed point, the sectorwise Appendix B decompositions and the common residual isometry required above exist.
- MPSTensor.IsResidualIsometryFamily.residualFamilyPhysicalIsometryMatrix_isometry
- MPSTensor.ResidualFamilyAppendixBData.twoSiteBondEmbedding_range
- MPSTensor.ResidualFamilyAppendixBData.twoSiteBondEmbedding_range_eq_directSum_groundSpace
- MPSTensor.ResidualFamilyAppendixBData.twoSiteBondSupportProjection_range
- MPSTensor.ResidualFamilyAppendixBData.twoSiteBondSupportProjection_eq_complement
- MPSTensor.IsBNTCanonicalForm.exists_residualFamilyAppendixBData
Let \(\mathcal V=\bigsqcup _j\{ j\} \times [D_j]\times [D_j]\) be the disjoint union of the within-sector virtual pairs. For \(x=(j,\alpha ,\beta )\) in \(\mathcal V\), set \(u_x(i)=(U_j^i)_{\alpha ,\beta }\). Then \(\sum _i u_x(i)\overline{u_y(i)}=\delta _{x,y}\).
Let \((A_j)_j\) be a family of normal, irreducible, left-canonical blocks, no two of which are gauge-phase equivalent, with \(\dim _j\ge 1\) for all \(j\), and suppose the direct sum \(\bigoplus _j A_j\) is a renormalization fixed point. Then there are invertible matrices \(X_j\), trace-one positive diagonal matrices \(\rho _j=\operatorname{diag}(\lambda _{j,\alpha })\), and tensors \(U_j\) with
such that \((U_j)_j\) satisfies the joint isometry condition. These are the isometry equations of [ CPGSV16 , Corollary 3.12 ] for the direct sum of distinct normal-tensor blocks.
For \(u\ge 0\) and \(s{\gt}0\), one has \(r_n\in [0,s]\) and \(nu=m_ns+r_n\).
If an MPS tensor \(A\) is a renormalization fixed point, then it saturates the area law: for every chain length \(N\) and every block length \(1\le L{\lt}\lfloor N/2\rfloor \), the pure-state block entropy is constant in the block size, \(S_L^{(N)}(A)=S_{L+1}^{(N)}(A)\). The source statement is [ CPGSV16 , Proposition 3.14, lines 606–608 ] . It assumes canonical form; the theorem above is the stronger pure-state implication obtained from transfer-map idempotence alone.
If an MPS tensor \(A\) is a renormalization fixed point, then all block entropies in the range \(1\le L\le \lfloor N/2\rfloor \) coincide:
This is the explicit constant-entropy chain of the area-law saturation [ CPGSV16 , Definition 3.13, line 600 ] , under the fixed-point hypothesis.
Let \((B_k)_k\) be a family of normal, irreducible, left-canonical blocks with \(\dim _k\ge 1\) for all \(k\), no two of which are gauge-phase equivalent. Then the direct sum \(\bigoplus _k B_k\) is a renormalization fixed point if and only if each block is in the square-root fixed-point form and the mixed transfer operators between distinct blocks vanish:
This is the distinct-blocks (multiplicity-one, phase-one) case of the structural characterization of pure-state renormalization fixed points [ CPGSV16 , Theorem 3.11 ] , combining its forward and backward directions.
Let \((A_k)_k\) satisfy the auxiliary block-family hypotheses of Definition 24.3.1.1. For each \(k\), the transfer map of \(A_k\) is idempotent if and only if \(A_k\) satisfies the one-block auxiliary conjunction of Definition 24.5.11. The block-family hypothesis is unused; this is Theorem 24.5.13 applied to one block. It should not be read as the BNT-family ZCL assertion in [ CPGSV16 , Theorem 3.10 ] .
If \(A\) has nonzero virtual dimension, is a normal tensor in the sense of [ CPGSV16 ] , and is a renormalization fixed point, then for every chain length \(N{\gt}2\) the two-site local terms commute. This theorem records the commutation part of the nearest-neighbor source condition, not the ground-space spanning part.
If \(A\) has nonzero virtual dimension, is a normal tensor in the sense of [ CPGSV16 ] , and is a renormalization fixed point, then for every chain length \(N{\gt}2\) the MPS vector \(V^{(N)}(A)\) satisfies the commutation and zero-energy equations for nearest-neighbor local terms:
The zero-energy equation is the usual parent-Hamiltonian frustration-freeness statement. The separate ground-space spanning clause of the source definition is not asserted here.
Let \(P\) be an auxiliary BNT sector decomposition with distinct basis tensors \((A_j)_j\), and let \(A=\bigoplus _j A_j\) be their direct sum with one unit-weight copy of each sector. If \(A\) is a renormalization fixed point,
then the following restricted conclusion holds: its physical correlations are independent of the separation whenever both complementary gaps are positive, and for all distinct BNT components \(j\ne j'\)
This is a multiplicity-one, unit-weight, positive-gap statement. It does not assert the physical zero-correlation-length conclusion of [ CPGSV16 , Theorem 3.8 ] .
Let \(A_1,\ldots ,A_g\) be the distinct basis tensors of a BNT canonical form, and let \(B=\bigoplus _{j=1}^g A_j\) contain one copy of every basis tensor. If \(B\) is a renormalization fixed point, then for every \(N{\gt}2\) its translated two-site parent interactions commute and
Hence \(B\) satisfies the all-chain nearest-neighbor commuting parent-Hamiltonian ground-space condition. This is the multiplicity-one distinct-sector forward implication in [ CPGSV16 , Definition 3.9 and Theorem 3.10 ] . It does not include repeated copies or arbitrary raw sector weights.
Let \(A_1,\ldots ,A_g\) be the distinct basis tensors of a BNT canonical form, and let \(B=\bigoplus _{j=1}^g A_j\) contain one copy of every basis tensor. If \(B\) is a renormalization fixed point, then for every \(N{\gt}2\) its translated two-site parent interactions commute pairwise. Thus \(B\) satisfies the nearest-neighbor commuting parent-Hamiltonian condition.
This statement treats one copy of every distinct sector. It does not include repeated copies or arbitrary raw sector weights.
Let \(A_1,\ldots ,A_g\) be the distinct basis tensors of a BNT canonical form, and let \(B=\bigoplus _{j=1}^g A_j\) contain one copy of every basis tensor. If \(B\) is a renormalization fixed point, then for every \(N{\gt}2\),
This is the multiplicity-one distinct-sector case of [ CPGSV16 , Theorem 3.10 ] . It does not include repeated copies of a basis tensor or arbitrary raw sector weights.
Assume \(D {\gt} 0\). Let \(A\) be a normal renormalization fixed point such that \(\sum _i (A^i)^\dagger A^i = \mathbb {1}\). Then there exist a unitary \(U\) and a diagonal positive definite matrix \(\Lambda \) such that, for \(B^i := U^\dagger A^i U\), \(\sum _i (B^i)^\dagger B^i = \mathbb {1}\) and \(\mathcal{E}_B(\Lambda ) = \Lambda \). This is the diagonal fixed-point reduction in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix B ] .
A normal left-canonical renormalization fixed-point tensor \(A\) admits a decomposition \(A^i=X\Lambda U^iX^{-1}\), where \(\Lambda \) is diagonal positive, \(\sum _i (U^i)^\dagger U^i=I\), and
When each block \(A_k\) of a multi-block tensor is a normal, left-canonical renormalization fixed point, that block admits the isometry decomposition \(A_k^i = X_k \Lambda _k U_k^i X_k^{-1}\), with \(X_k\) invertible, \(\Lambda _k\) diagonal positive, and \(U_k = (U_k^i)\) satisfies \(\sum _i (U_k^i)^\dagger U_k^i = I\) and the pair-index orthonormality condition
This is the blockwise form of the diagonal Kraus decomposition (Theorem 24.3.1.7); see [ CPGSV16 , Section 3 ] . The source additionally imposes the normalization \(\operatorname{tr}(\Lambda _k) = 1\); the statement here gives positive \(\Lambda _k\) without it. That normalization is genuine rather than a conjugation gauge, since rescaling \(\Lambda _k \mapsto \Lambda _k/\operatorname{tr}(\Lambda _k)\) factors out as an overall scalar on \(A_k^i\) (conjugation by \(X_k\) preserves the scale); the statement is thus the unnormalized diagonal Kraus form. Scope restriction (source isometry). Corollary 3.12 also invokes the joint isometry condition
The theorem above records the contracted per-block condition \(\sum _i (U_k^i)^\dagger U_k^i=I\) and the diagonal pair-index equation with right-hand side \(D_k^{-1}\delta _{\alpha ,\alpha '}\delta _{\beta ,\beta '}\). It does not impose the trace-normalization \(\operatorname{tr}(\Lambda _k)=1\), and it does not include the cross-block equations for \(k\ne \ell \).
Under the hypotheses of Theorem 24.3.1.10, each block admits a decomposition \(A_k^i = X_k \Lambda _k U_k^i X_k^{-1}\) with \(\Lambda _k\) diagonal positive and
This is a blockwise unit pair-index decomposition. It still does not impose the source trace-normalization of \(\Lambda _k\) or the cross-block orthogonality equations for distinct blocks.
The decomposition in Theorem 24.3.1.7 additionally records that the diagonal weights satisfy \(\sum _\alpha \Lambda _\alpha ^2 = D\). This square-sum identity is the trace-normalization seed: the explicit weights are \(\Lambda _\alpha = \sqrt{D\, \rho _{\alpha ,\alpha }/\operatorname{tr}\rho }\), and \(\sum _\alpha \rho _{\alpha ,\alpha } = \operatorname{tr}\rho \) for the diagonal fixed point \(\rho \).
A normal left-canonical renormalization fixed-point tensor \(A\) admits a decomposition \(A^i=X\Lambda U^iX^{-1}\), where \(\Lambda \) is diagonal positive and
This is the unit pair-index convention of [ CPGSV16 , Section 3 ] . The statement still does not impose the trace-normalization \(\operatorname{tr}(\Lambda )=1\).
Let \(A\) have positive bond dimension and be a normal renormalization fixed-point tensor in the sense of [ CPGSV16 ] . If the canonical-form tensor consists of the single normal sector \(A\), then for every \(N{\gt}2\), \(\ker H_2^{(N)}(A) =\operatorname{span}\bigl\{ V^{(N)}(A)\bigr\} \). Its translated two-site interactions also commute and annihilate \(V^{(N)}(A)\). Hence the singleton family satisfies the all-chain nearest-neighbor commuting parent-Hamiltonian ground-space condition.
This statement is restricted to one normal sector. It does not assert the corresponding result for canonical-form tensors with several sectors or repeated copies.
If \(M\) is a renormalization fixed point via trace-preserving maps, then \(\mathcal T_M^2=\mathcal T_M\). This proves the zero-correlation-length component of implication (i)\(\Rightarrow \)(ii) in [ CPGSV16 , Theorem 4.9, lines 851–893 ] . The corresponding calculation appears in the proposition “RFP implies ZCL and SAL” in Appendix C, lines 1333–1340; the part establishing saturation of the area law is separate.
Fix one block \(A_k\) in a family satisfying Definition 24.3.1.1. Then the primitive transfer map of that block satisfies: \(\mathcal{E}_{A_k}^{2^n}\) converges pointwise to an idempotent linear map \(\mathcal{E}_{k,\infty }\) as \(n\to \infty \). Thus there exists \(\mathcal{E}_{k,\infty }\) with \(\mathcal{E}_{k,\infty }^2=\mathcal{E}_{k,\infty }\) such that \(\mathcal{E}_{A_k}^{2^n}(\rho )\to \mathcal{E}_{k,\infty }(\rho )\) for every bond matrix \(\rho \). This is the per-block primitive convergence used in the Appendix B discussion, not convergence of the full weighted canonical-family transfer matrix [ CPGSV16 , Appendix B, lines 1211–1244 ] .
Let \(\mathcal{E}_A(\rho ) = \rho \) and let \(S\) be an invertible matrix with \(SS^\dagger = \rho \). Define the gauged operators \(A'^i = S^{-1}A^iS\). Then \(\sum _i A'^i(A'^i)^\dagger = \mathbb {1}\), i.e. the gauged Kraus map is unital. This is the right-canonical normalization.
Assume \(A\) is \(L_0\)-block-injective with \(L_0 {\gt} 0\). If matrices \((Z_j)_j\) satisfy \(Z_jA^\sigma =A^jY_\sigma \) for every word \(\sigma \) of length \(K\), then there exists a matrix \(X\) such that \(Z_j=A^jX\) for all \(j\).
If \(A\) and \(\bigoplus _k\mu _kB_k\) have the same MPV coefficients at every positive length, then after any positive blocking length \(p\), \(A^{[p]}\) and \(\bigoplus _k\mu _k^{\, p}B_k^{[p]}\) have the same MPV coefficients at every positive length.
If \(\bigoplus _j\mu _j^AA_j\) and \(\bigoplus _k\mu _k^BB_k\) have the same MPV coefficients at every positive length, then after any positive common blocking length \(p\), \(\bigoplus _j(\mu _j^A)^pA_j^{[p]}\) and \(\bigoplus _k(\mu _k^B)^pB_k^{[p]}\) have the same MPV coefficients at every positive length.
Let \(K\) be a trace-preserving Kraus family, let \(\rho {\gt}0\) satisfy \(T(\rho )=\rho \) for the associated channel \(T(\rho )=\sum _iK_i\rho K_i^\dagger \), and assume every adjoint fixed point of \(T^*\) is a scalar multiple of \(\mathbb {1}\). Then \(E_\rho \) is a conditional expectation onto the adjoint fixed-point \(*\)-subalgebra.
The zero vector has Schmidt rank zero, every vector satisfies \(\operatorname{SR}(\psi )\le \min (D,k)\), and every product vector \(u\otimes v\) has Schmidt rank at most one.
The Schmidt singular values are indexed from zero. The nonzero Schmidt singular values of \(\psi \) are exactly those with index below \(\operatorname{SR}(\psi )\). Equivalently, for zero-based indexing, \(s_k(\psi )=0\) if and only if \(\operatorname{SR}(\psi )\le k\).
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be a positive linear map with \(T(\mathbb {1})\le \mathbb {1}\). If \(A\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) admits a positive semidefinite dominant \(B\ge 0\) with \(A^\dagger A\le B\) and \(B\) commuting with \(A\) (\(BA=AB\)), then
This is [ Wol12 , Theorem 5.6 ] .
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be a positive linear map with \(T(\mathbb {1})\le \mathbb {1}\). If \(A\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) is normal, then \(T(A^\dagger A)-T(A^\dagger )T(A)\ge 0\). This is [ Wol12 , Proposition 5.1 ] .
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be a positive linear map with \(T(\mathbb {1})\le \mathbb {1}\). If \(A\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) is subnormal (i.e. there exists a normal operator on a larger space whose compression to \(\mathbb {C}^D\) is \(A\)), then \(T(A^\dagger A)-T(A^\dagger )T(A)\ge 0\). This is [ Wol12 , Theorem 5.5 ] .
Let the representative \(A_j\) have bond dimension \(D_j\), and let \(D\) be the bond dimension of the flattened sector tensor. Then \(D_j\leq D\). If every \(D_j\) is positive and there are \(g\) representatives, then also \(g\leq D\).
Let \(P, Q\) be two BNT canonical forms with the same MPV family at every positive length. Then there is a bijection \(\beta : J(Q) \simeq J(P)\) such that for every \(k \in J(Q)\) the bond dimensions match, the basis tensors \(P_{\beta (k)}\) and \(Q_k\) are gauge-phase equivalent after identifying the matched bond dimensions, and the basis cross-overlap does not tend to zero.
Let \(P\) and \(Q\) be BNT canonical forms whose total tensors have the same MPV family at every positive length. Then there exist:
a bijection \(\beta :J(Q)\simeq J(P)\),
bond-dimension equalities \(\dim P_{\beta (k)}=\dim Q_k\),
copy-number equalities \(r_{\beta (k)}(P)=r_k(Q)\) and copy permutations \(\tau _k\),
unit-modulus phases \(\zeta _k\) with \(|\zeta _k|=1\) and block gauges \(X_k\),
such that, for every sector \(k\), copy \(q\), and physical index \(i\),
Moreover, if \(X=\bigoplus _k (\mathbf{1}_{r_k}\otimes X_k)\) is the flattened block-diagonal gauge, then, for every physical index \(i\), the flattened \(Q\)-coordinates satisfy
This is the explicit direct-sum gauge construction of [ CPGSV16 , Appendix MPV proof, lines 1189–1192 ] .
Let \(P\) and \(Q\) be BNT canonical forms whose total tensors have the same MPV family at every positive length. Then the total bond dimensions agree; write their common value as \(D\). There is
such that, for every physical index \(i\),
where \(P_{\mathrm{tot}}^i\) and \(Q_{\mathrm{tot}}^i\) are both regarded as matrices in \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) using the total bond-dimension equality. This is the BNT form of [ CPGSV16 , Corollary II.2 and Appendix MPV proof, lines 1189–1192 ] .
Under the hypotheses of the equal-MPV theorem, one may choose simultaneously the sector bijection, bond-dimension equalities, copy bijections, phases, block gauges, total-dimension equality, and the flattened global gauge. They satisfy the matched block and weight identities of Theorem 11.2.4, together with the conjugation of \(Q\) by the matched-coordinate \(P\)-tensor.
Let \(P, Q\) be two BNT canonical forms with the same MPV family (at all positive lengths). For every sector \(j\) of \(P\) there exist a sector \(k\) of \(Q\) with matched bond dimension \(\dim _P(j) = \dim _Q(k)\), a gauge-phase equivalence after identifying the matched bond dimensions, and a non-decaying cross-overlap. No per-sector unit-modulus hypothesis is required.
Let \(P, Q\) be two BNT canonical forms with the same MPV family at every positive length. Then for every sector \(k\) of \(Q\) there exist a sector \(j\) of \(P\) with matched bond dimension \(\dim _P(j) = \dim _Q(k)\), a gauge-phase equivalence after identifying the matched bond dimensions, and a non-decaying cross-overlap.
Suppose that the sectors of \(P\) and \(Q\) are matched, with bond-dimension equalities, nonzero phases, and block gauges satisfying \(Q_k^i=\zeta _k X_kP_{\beta (k)}^iX_k^{-1}\). If the same phases also give a copy-weight matching, then the flattened \(Q\)-tensor is obtained from the matched-coordinate \(P\)-tensor by the direct-sum gauge \(X=\bigoplus _k(\mathbf{1}_{r_k}\otimes X_k)\). This is only a reformulation of Theorem 11.2.2.
Suppose that the sectors of two sector decompositions \(P\) and \(Q\) are matched by a bijection \(\beta :J(Q)\simeq J(P)\), with bond-dimension equalities, copy permutations \(\tau _k\), nonzero phases \(\zeta _k\), and block gauges \(X_k\). If, for every sector \(k\), copy \(q\), and physical index \(i\),
then, in the flattened \(Q\)-coordinates,
This is the direct-sum gauge construction of [ CPGSV16 , Appendix MPV proof, lines 1189–1192 ] , separated from the coefficient-comparison step that supplies the weight identities.
Let \(P\) and \(Q\) be BNT canonical forms whose total MPV families are eventually nonzero and proportional. There is a bijection \(\beta :J(Q)\simeq J(P)\) such that every \(Q_k\) has an equal-dimensional, gauge-phase-equivalent partner \(P_{\beta (k)}\) satisfying
Let \(P\) and \(Q\) be BNT canonical forms whose total MPV families are eventually nonzero and proportional. For every sector \(j\) of \(P\), there is a sector \(k\) of \(Q\) with equal bond dimension, gauge-phase-equivalent basis tensor after the dimension identification, and non-decaying cross-overlap.
Let \(P\) and \(Q\) be BNT canonical forms whose total tensors generate eventually nonzero proportional MPV families. Then there are a bijection \(\beta :J(Q)\simeq J(P)\), bond-dimension equalities, unit-modulus phases \(\zeta _k\), and block gauges \(X_k\) such that \(Q_k^i=\zeta _k X_kP_{\beta (k)}^iX_k^{-1}\) for every sector \(k\) and physical index \(i\). If one additionally assumes that these same phases satisfy the matched-sector coefficient identities \(c_N^{(\beta (k))}(P)=\zeta _k^N\, c_N^{(k)}(Q)\) for all sufficiently large \(N\), then they determine a copy-weight matching and hence the flattened \(Q\)-tensor is obtained from the matched-coordinate \(P\)-tensor by the direct-sum gauge \(X=\bigoplus _k(\mathbf{1}_{r_k}\otimes X_k)\).
Let \(P\) and \(Q\) be BNT canonical forms whose total tensors generate eventually nonzero proportional MPV families. Then the proportional sector-matching theorem gives \(\beta \), the bond-dimension equalities, the unit phases \(\zeta _k\), and the block gauges \(X_k\). If one additionally assumes a copy-weight matching for these same phases, then the flattened \(Q\)-tensor is obtained from the matched-coordinate \(P\)-tensor by the direct-sum gauge \(X=\bigoplus _k(\mathbf{1}_{r_k}\otimes X_k)\).
Let \(P\) and \(Q\) be BNT canonical forms whose total tensors generate eventually nonzero proportional MPV families. Then there are a bijection \(\beta :J(Q)\simeq J(P)\), bond-dimension equalities \(\dim P_{\beta (k)}=\dim Q_k\), scalars \(\zeta _k\in \mathbb {C}\), and block gauges \(X_k\) such that \(|\zeta _k|=1\) and, for every sector \(k\) and physical index \(i\),
Diagrammatically, the gauge relation (??) reads
with every open virtual end a matrix index. Equivalently, for every positive length \(N\) and word \(\sigma \),
This is [ CPGSV16 , Appendix MPV theorem statement, lines 1167–1170, and proof line 1182 ] .
Physical blocking preserves the copy sets and bond dimensions. On the flattened copy index, it raises the weight to the \(p\)-th power and replaces the representative by its \(p\)-site blocking.
- MPSTensor.SectorDecomposition.blockTensor_basis
- MPSTensor.SectorDecomposition.blockTensor_weight
- MPSTensor.SectorDecomposition.blockTensor_copies
- MPSTensor.SectorDecomposition.blockTensor_totalCopies
- MPSTensor.SectorDecomposition.blockTensor_flatDim
- MPSTensor.SectorDecomposition.blockTensor_totalDim
- MPSTensor.SectorDecomposition.blockTensor_flatWeight
- MPSTensor.SectorDecomposition.blockTensor_flatBasis
The coefficient of the blocked decomposition satisfies
Moreover, blocking the tensor assembled from \(P\) gives the same MPV family as the tensor assembled from the blocked sector decomposition.
Let \(A\) be a left-canonical irreducible MPS tensor with \(D{\gt}0\), let \(m\) be the period of its cyclic-sector decomposition, and let \((P_u)_{u=1}^m\) be the cyclic projections of the adjoint transfer map with \(\mathcal{E}_{A^\dagger }(P_{u+1})=P_u\) and \(\sum _uP_u=\mathbb {1}\). Then the restriction of \((\mathcal{E}_{A^\dagger })^m\) to each corner \(P_uM_{D}(\mathbb {C})P_u\) is irreducible.
Let \(P\) be a BNT canonical form with total bond dimension \(D\). There is a positive integer \(N\leq 3D^5\) such that its representatives have the simultaneous fixed-length span
This is the block-injectivity estimate in [ CPGSV16 , lines 340–345 ] .
These are conditional constructions under hypotheses stronger than SAL and ZCL; neither is the printed Lemma C.5 or its corollary. In the first, \(T\) is positive semidefinite, \(\operatorname{tr}(T)=1\), and \(\operatorname{tr}(T^m)=1\) for every positive integer \(m\); the spectral theorem then gives the rank-one factorization \(T=ab^\top \) with \(a\cdot b=1\). In the second, \(T\) is the sector trace matrix of linearly independent sector tensors satisfying the zero-correlation-length pairing identity. This identity implies \(T^2=T\), so trace one gives the same rank-one factorization. In this second form the constancy of the positive-power traces is a conclusion rather than an assumption.
Let \(M\) be the ancilla contraction of a pure-state renormalization fixed point, satisfying the local purification renormalization fixed point condition. If the physical-trace transfer \(\mathcal T_M=\sum _i M^{ii}\) is nonzero, then \(M\) has source zero correlation length.
At the top index \(n=D'\), the Schmidt-rank constraint is vacuous and each Ky-Fan \(D'\)-norm reduces to \(\| \rho _i\| _{(D')}=\operatorname{tr}\rho _i=1\). Thus the lower and upper bounds of [ Wol12 , Chapter 3, Proposition 3.2 ] reduce to the Rayleigh characterization of the least eigenvalue: the lower bound becomes \(\nu _{\min }\le \langle \psi |\tau |\psi \rangle \) for every normalized \(\psi \), and the upper bound on the infimum becomes the existence of a normalized eigenvector with \(\langle \psi |\tau |\psi \rangle =\nu _{\min }\). Together they give
There is no Schmidt-rank restriction. Together with Theorems 22.2.2.6 and 22.2.2.7, this covers the full range \(1\le n\le D'\) of [ Wol12 , Chapter 3, Proposition 3.2 ] .
Let \(\tau \) be a Hermitian operator on \(\mathbb {C}^{D'}\otimes \mathbb {C}^{D}\) with eigenvalues \(\nu _i\) and normalized eigenvectors \(\phi _i\), and write \(\rho _i=\operatorname{tr}_2|\phi _i\rangle \! \langle \phi _i|\) for the reduced density operator of \(\phi _i\) on the first factor. Let \(1\le n{\lt}D'\) and let \(\nu _0\ge 0\) be a lower bound for the positive eigenvalues (the smallest positive eigenvalue). Then every normalized vector \(\psi \) of Schmidt rank at most \(n\) satisfies
Hence the same bound holds for the infimum over such vectors. This is the lower bound of [ Wol12 , Chapter 3, Proposition 3.2 ] for \(n{\lt}D'\); the top index \(n=D'\) is Theorem 22.2.2.8.
Let \(E\) be an irreducible completely positive map on \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\). Suppose \(\rho {\gt} 0\) and \(E(\rho ) = r\rho \) with \(r {\gt} 0\). Then the spectral radius of \(E\) is \(r\). This is the completely positive specialization of [ Wol12 , Theorem 6.3(4) ] .
Let \(B\) be an irreducible tensor with a positive definite transfer eigenvector, \(\mathcal{E}_B(\rho )=r\rho \), where \(\rho {\gt}0\) and \(r{\gt}0\). Then the rescaled unital gauge \(K^v=r^{-1/2}\rho ^{-1/2}B^v\rho ^{1/2}\) is a unital Kraus family, is an irreducible tensor with an irreducible transfer map, and its adjoint map has a positive definite fixed point. These are the hypotheses of the cyclic decomposition of the peripheral spectrum, [ Wol12 , Theorem 6.6 ] .
With \(\tau \), \(\phi _i\), and \(\rho _i\) as above, let \(1\le n{\lt}D'\) and suppose every eigenvalue of \(\tau \) is at most \(\nu \). For any eigenvector index \(j\), there is a normalized vector \(\psi \) of Schmidt rank at most \(n\) with
Hence the infimum over such vectors lies below that value. Taking \(\nu \) to be the largest positive eigenvalue and \(j\) the index of the unique non-positive eigenvalue \(\nu _-\) recovers the upper bound \(\nu +(\nu _--\nu )\| \rho _-\| _{(n)}\) of [ Wol12 , Chapter 3, Proposition 3.2 ] . The statement is for \(n{\lt}D'\); the top index \(n=D'\) is Theorem 22.2.2.8.
Let \(A\) be an irreducible normalized MPS tensor whose transfer map \(\mathcal{E}_A\) is primitive. Then there is a nonzero positive semidefinite fixed point \(\rho \) of \(\mathcal{E}_A\) with \(\operatorname{tr}(\rho )\neq 0\) such that, for \(P:=P_\rho \) and \(N:=\mathcal{E}_A-P\), \(\rho _{\operatorname{spec}}(N){\lt}1\).
For \(p=0,1\), let \(A_p\) be an injective MPS tensor whose parent Hamiltonian \(H_p\) has a unique ground state and is symmetric under a unitary representation \(U^p\) of \(G\) on \(\mathcal{H}_p\). Choose the endpoint phase gauges. After a common finite blocking, the embedded endpoints admit a continuous symmetric MPS path with corresponding translationally invariant, finite-range parent Hamiltonians that vary smoothly and remain uniformly gapped if and only if their virtual projective representations determine the same class in \(H^2(G,\mathrm U(1))\).
More precisely, for the forward construction there exist a path-sector Hilbert space \(\mathcal{H}_{\mathrm{path}}\) and a linear representation \(U^{\mathrm{path}}\) such that the endpoints embed into
The converse quantifies over smooth paths whose unique ground states remain MPS and whose Hamiltonians are the corresponding parent Hamiltonians, as in [ SPGC11 , Section II.F, lines 929–953 ] . It does not assert invariance along an arbitrary gapped Hamiltonian path.
Assume \(D{\gt}0\). For every \(\psi \in \mathbb {C}^D\otimes \mathbb {C}^D\), there is \(X\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})(\mathbb {C})\) such that
In particular, if \(\operatorname{SR}(\psi )\le r\), then \(X\) may be chosen with \(\operatorname{rank}X\le r\).
Let \(\rho _{ABC}\) be a tripartite density matrix and set \(\sigma _{ABC}=(\mathbf1_A/d_A)\otimes \rho _{BC}\). Then equality holds in strong subadditivity if and only if relative-entropy data processing under the partial trace over \(C\) is saturated for this pair:
By Lemma 21.4.3, the reference on the right is \((\mathbf1_A/d_A)\otimes \rho _B\).
This is an equivalent hypothesis-free criterion with a different reference state. The exact product-marginal formulation is Theorem 21.4.36.
Let \(\rho _{ABC}\) be a tripartite density matrix. Then equality holds in strong subadditivity if and only if relative-entropy data processing under the partial trace over \(C\) is saturated for the pair \(\rho _{ABC}\) and \(\rho _A\otimes \rho _{BC}\):
Moreover, \(\operatorname{tr}_C(\rho _A\otimes \rho _{BC})=\rho _A\otimes \rho _B\). This is the product-marginal formulation in [ HJPW04 , Equations (5)–(7) ] .
Let \(\rho \) be a Hermitian operator on \(A\otimes B\otimes C\), and let \(e_A:A'\to A\), \(e_B:B'\to B\), and \(e_C:C'\to C\) be bijections. Define \(\rho '\) by
If \(\rho \) satisfies equality in strong subadditivity, then so does \(\rho '\).
Let \(S\) be a \(*\)-subalgebra of \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) and let \(\mathcal{D}\) be a finite, nonempty family of pairwise orthogonal subspaces of \(\mathbb {C}^D\), irreducible under \(S\) and pairwise of the same type. Write \(m\) for the number of pieces in \(\mathcal{D}\); all pieces share one dimension \(d\). Then the component \(C=\bigvee _{W\in \mathcal{D}}W\) has an orthonormal basis \((f_{i,j})_{0\leq i{\lt}m,\, 0\leq j{\lt}d}\) such that for every \(A\in S\) there is a matrix \(B\in M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\) satisfying
for all \(i{\lt}m\) and \(j{\lt}d\). In the adapted basis, \(A\) acts on \(C\) by the matrix \(B\) on the irreducible index, identically across the multiplicity index; after reordering the indices this is the block \(M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\otimes \mathbb {1}_m\) of [ Wol12 , Theorem 6.14 ] . The vectors \((f_{i,j})_{0\leq j{\lt}d}\) of the \(i\)-th copy span one of the pieces of \(\mathcal{D}\).
Let \(S\) be a \(*\)-subalgebra of \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\). There are positive integers \(d_k,m_k\) and an orthonormal basis \((f_{k,i,j})_{k{\lt}K,\, i{\lt}m_k,\, j{\lt}d_k}\) of \(\mathbb {C}^D\) such that every \(A\in S\) acts by
while every \(T\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) commuting with all members of \(S\) acts by
Thus the same orthonormal identification realizes \(S\) on the second tensor factor and its commutant on the complementary first tensor factor. This is the finite-dimensional \(C^*\)-algebra step used in the proof of [ Bei12 , Lemma 2.1 ] .
Let \(S\) be a \(*\)-subalgebra of \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\). There are \(K\in \mathbb {N}\), positive dimensions \(d_0,\ldots ,d_{K-1}\) and multiplicities \(m_0,\ldots ,m_{K-1}\), and an orthonormal basis \((f_{k,i,j})_{k{\lt}K,\, i{\lt}m_k,\, j{\lt}d_k}\) of \(\mathbb {C}^D\) such that for every \(A\in S\) there are matrices \(B_k\in M_{d_k}(\mathbb {C})\) satisfying
for all \(k{\lt}K\), \(i{\lt}m_k\), and \(j{\lt}d_k\). In this basis, \(A\) acts on the \(k\)-th component as \(\mathbb {1}_{m_k}\otimes B_k\). Each row \((f_{k,i,j})_{0\leq j{\lt}d_k}\) spans a subspace irreducible under \(S\), and rows drawn from distinct components span subspaces that are never of the same type. Only the containment direction is asserted: every member of \(S\) takes this form. Equality with the block algebra, including the reverse inclusion, is Theorem 25.6.13.
Let \(S\) be a \(*\)-subalgebra of \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\). Then \(\mathbb {C}^D\) is the supremum of a finite family of pairwise orthogonal isotypic components, and each component carries an orthonormal basis \((f_{i,j})\), indexed by a multiplicity index \(i{\lt}m\) and an irreducible index \(j{\lt}d\), such that every \(A\in S\) acts by
for a matrix \(B\in M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\) depending only on \(A\) and the component. In the adapted bases, the action of \(S\) on each component is by matrix-times-identity blocks, the form \(M_{d_k}(\mathbb {C})\otimes \mathbb {1}_{m_k}\) of [ Wol12 , Theorem 6.14 ] .
Let \(S\) be a \(*\)-subalgebra of \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\). Then \(\mathbb {C}^D\) is the sum of a finite family of pairwise orthogonal subspaces, each irreducible under \(S\); that is, \(\mathbb {C}^D\) is an orthogonal direct sum of irreducible invariant subspaces.
Let \(S\) be a \(*\)-subalgebra of \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\). Then \(\mathbb {C}^D\) is the supremum of a finite family \(\mathcal{C}\) of pairwise orthogonal subspaces, the isotypic components, and each component \(C\in \mathcal{C}\) is the supremum \(C=\bigvee _{W\in \mathcal{D}_C}W\) of a finite, nonempty class \(\mathcal{D}_C\) of pairwise orthogonal subspaces irreducible under \(S\) that are pairwise of the same type. Moreover, for distinct components \(C\neq C'\), no subspace irreducible under \(S\) contained in \(C\) is of the same type as any subspace irreducible under \(S\) contained in \(C'\).
Let \(S\) be a \(*\)-subalgebra of \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\). There are \(K\in \mathbb {N}\), positive dimensions \(d_0,\ldots ,d_{K-1}\) and multiplicities \(m_0,\ldots ,m_{K-1}\) with \(\sum _kd_km_k=D\), realized by an explicit identification of the index sets, and a unitary \(U\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) such that every \(A\in S\) satisfies
for matrices \(B_k\in M_{d_k}(\mathbb {C})\) depending on \(A\). Up to reordering the two tensor factors of each block, this is the containment direction of the unital case of the block representation of [ Wol12 , Theorem 6.14 ] : \(S\) is carried by \(U\) into the block algebra \(\bigoplus _k\mathbb {1}_{m_k}\otimes M_{d_k}(\mathbb {C})\). Equality, including the reverse inclusion, is Theorem 25.6.13.
Let \(S\) be a \(*\)-subalgebra of \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\). There are \(K\in \mathbb {N}\), positive dimensions \(d_0,\ldots ,d_{K-1}\) and multiplicities \(m_0,\ldots ,m_{K-1}\) with \(\sum _kd_km_k=D\), realized by an explicit identification of the index sets, and a unitary \(U\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) such that a matrix \(A\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) belongs to \(S\) exactly when
for some matrices \(B_k\in M_{d_k}(\mathbb {C})\); that is, up to reordering the two tensor factors of each block,
This is the block representation of a finite-dimensional \(*\)-algebra in Equation (1.39) of [ Wol12 ] , invoked by [ Wol12 , Theorem 6.14 ] , in the unital case: a \(*\)-subalgebra contains the identity matrix, so there is no zero block.
There exist \(n\in \mathbb {N}\) and dimensions \(d_1,\ldots ,d_n\geq 1\) such that every \(*\)-subalgebra of \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) is \(\mathbb {C}\)-algebra isomorphic to \(\prod _{k=1}^nM_{d_k}(\mathbb {C})\).
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be positive and trace preserving, set \(\rho _0=T_\infty (\mathbb {1})\), and let \(Q_0\) be the support projection of \(\rho _0\). There are a finite-dimensional Hilbert space \(\mathcal H\) and an isometry \(V:\mathcal H\to \mathbb {C}^D\) with \(V^*V=\mathbb {1}_{\mathcal H}\) and \(VV^*=Q_0\) such that
is positive and trace preserving and has a positive definite fixed point. Moreover,
These are Equations (6.52) and (6.51), respectively, of [ Wol12 ] . Thus the complementary fixed-point summand vanishes.
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be positive, and let \(\rho \succeq 0\) satisfy \(T(\rho )=\rho \). If \(Q\) is the support projection of \(\rho \), then, for every \(X\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\),
For Kraus operators \(\{ K_j\} \) and \(A\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\),
This is the Stinespring representation of the dual (Heisenberg picture) map \(T^*\).
The Kraus map \(T(\rho )=\sum _jK_j\rho K_j^\dagger \) equals the partial trace over the dilation space:
This is the Schrödinger-picture Stinespring representation.
In the square specialization \(d_{\mathrm{in}}=d_{\mathrm{out}}=D\), one has \(V^\dagger V=\mathbb {1}_D\) if and only if \(\sum _j K_j^\dagger K_j=\mathbb {1}_D\). In particular, \(V\) is an isometry precisely when the Kraus map is trace-preserving.
For an injective MPS, assume \(u u^\dagger = \mathbb {1}\), \(\mathcal{E}_A(\mathbb {1})=\mathbb {1}\), \(\Lambda \) is positive definite, \(\operatorname{tr}(\Lambda )=1\), and \(\mathcal{E}_A^\dagger (\Lambda )=\Lambda \). Then virtual-boundary nondecay for \(u\) holds if and only if \(A,u,\Lambda \) satisfy virtual local covariance.
Let \(A\) be injective, let \(\Lambda \in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), and assume \(u u^\dagger = \mathbb {1}\) and \(\mathcal{E}_A(\mathbb {1})=\mathbb {1}\). If virtual-boundary nondecay holds for \(u\) with boundary parameter \(\Lambda \), then \(A\) is gauge-phase equivalent to the companion tensor \(B_u\).
Every rotation \(R \in \mathrm{SO}(3)\) is realized by conjugating the Pauli vector by some \(U \in \mathrm{SU}(2)\): there is \(U \in \mathrm{SU}(2)\) with \((\tfrac 12\operatorname{tr}(\sigma _i U\sigma _j U^{-1}))_{ij} = R\). Equivalently, the adjoint double cover \(\mathrm{SU}(2) \to \mathrm{SO}(3)\) is surjective.
Let \(A\) and \(B\) be positive semidefinite. Their positive square roots, support inverse square roots, and support projections satisfy
Moreover,
If \(A\) is positive definite, then \(P_A=\mathbf1\).
Let \(A,B\) be positive semidefinite, let \(t{\gt}0\), set
and let \(P_B\) be the support projection of \(B\). Then
Consequently,
This is the one-pair algebraic identification used in the singular equality argument of Jenčová–Ruskai, arXiv:0903.2895v4, lines 783–790. It does not assert that equality of relative entropies gives a common resolvent for a finite family.
Under the hypotheses and notation of Lemma 21.4.19, suppose that
Then, for every \(i\in I\),
This is the support-domain form of the common-resolvent equation \((\mathrm{basiceq})\) in Section 3.1 of Jenčová–Ruskai, arXiv:0903.2895v4. Its residual calculation is the one in the Appendix, equations \((\mathrm{Mj})\) and \((\mathrm{eq:Schz1})\).
Let \(A\) be a tensor normalized on the support of an orthogonal projection \(P\), so that \(PA^iP=A^i\) and \(\sum _i(A^i)^\dagger A^i=P\). Then there are a corner tensor \(C\), a linear isomorphism \(\varphi :M_{\dim C}(\mathbb {C})\xrightarrow {\sim }PM_{D}(\mathbb {C})P\), and a rectangular isometry \(V:\mathbb {C}^{\dim C}\to \mathbb {C}^D\) such that
Moreover, \(\varphi (C^i)=A^i\) for every physical letter, and for every word \(\sigma =(\sigma _1,\ldots ,\sigma _N)\),
Diagonalize the projection \(P\) by a unitary change of basis. The inclusion of the support coordinates gives a rectangular isometry \(V\) satisfying (??). Compress the letters of \(A\) to this support and let \(\varphi \) be the corresponding corner isomorphism. The support relation \(PA^iP=A^i\) gives the corner-letter identity. For each word \(\sigma =(\sigma _1,\ldots ,\sigma _N)\), cyclicity of the trace and \(VV^\dagger =P\) give
which proves (??).
Let \(\rho \geq 0\) be a bipartite complex matrix whose first marginal is faithful. Choose an eigenbasis in which \(\operatorname{tr}_B\rho =\operatorname{diag}(p_1,\ldots ,p_{d_A})\) with every \(p_i{\gt}0\), and define the linear map \(\Phi _\rho \) on matrix units by
Then \(\Phi _\rho \) is completely positive and trace preserving, \(\dim \operatorname{range}\Phi _\rho =\operatorname {OSR}(\rho )\), and application of \(\Phi _\rho \) to the first half of \(\sum _{i,j}\sqrt{p_ip_j}\, E_{ij}\otimes E_{ij}\), followed by restoring the order of the two factors, reconstructs \(\rho \).
Every positive semidefinite matrix \(M \in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) admits a decomposition \(M=U\operatorname{diag}(\sigma )U^{\dagger }\), where \(U \in \mathcal{U}(D)\) is unitary and \(\sigma : \{ 0,\ldots ,D-1\} \to \mathbb {R}_{\ge 0}\) has non-negative entries.
Let \(\eta {\gt}0\) and \(1\le k{\lt}D\). Then \(T_\eta \) is \(k\)-positive if and only if \(\eta \ge k\). This is [ Wol12 , Equation (3.11) ] for \(1\le k{\lt}D\); the top index \(k=D\), where \(k\)-positivity is complete positivity, is Theorem 22.5.1.4.
Let \(\eta {\gt}0\) and \(D\ge 1\). Then \(T_\eta \) is \(D\)-positive if and only if \(\eta \ge D\). Together with Theorem 22.5.1.3 this is [ Wol12 , Equation (3.11) ] over the full range \(1\le k\le D\), where the top index \(k=D\) is complete positivity.
For a pure state \(|\psi \rangle \langle \psi |\) on the square bipartite system \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\otimes M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) with \(\operatorname{SR}(\psi )\le n\) and any \(n\)-positive map \(T\), applying \(T\) to the first factor keeps the result positive semidefinite: \((T\otimes \operatorname{id})(|\psi \rangle \langle \psi |)\ge 0\).
Applying \(T_\eta \) to the first factor of a bipartite matrix \(\rho \) gives
where \(\rho _2\) is the reduced density of \(\rho \) on the second factor.
For a pure state \(|\psi \rangle \langle \psi |\) on the square bipartite system \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\otimes M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) with \(\operatorname{SR}(\psi )\le n\) and \(1\le n{\lt}D\), applying \(T_n\) to the first factor keeps the result positive semidefinite: \((T_n\otimes \operatorname{id})(|\psi \rangle \langle \psi |)\ge 0\).
Suppose the first two length-two parent interactions commute on the three-site chain: \(h_0^{(3)}h_1^{(3)} =h_1^{(3)}h_0^{(3)}\). Then, for every \(N{\gt}2\) and every \(i\in \mathbb Z/N\mathbb Z\), the two adjacent translates commute: \(h_i^{(N)}h_{i+1}^{(N)} =h_{i+1}^{(N)}h_i^{(N)}\). For each exterior configuration \(\tau \), let \(R_{i,\tau }^{(3)}\) restrict to the cyclic three-site window beginning at \(i\). It intertwines the two \(N\)-site terms with the two three-site terms:
Thus the same local \(A\! X\! B\) calculation is placed at every cyclic translate through the two restriction identities above. The hypothesis \(N{\gt}2\) is essential to this transport: at \(N=2\) the two cyclic windows contain the same sites in opposite orders. This case is not part of [ CPGSV16 , Theorem 3.10 ] .
If \(A\) is injective, then \(G_3(A) = \ker (q_2(A)_{AX}) \cap \ker (q_2(A)_{XB})\). More generally, on \(L+1\) sites, simultaneous annihilation by the two adjacent length-\(L\) parent interactions is equivalent to membership in \(G_{L+1}(A)\) whenever \(A\) is injective and \(L{\gt}1\).
For an MPS tensor \(A\), the diagonal MPO embedding has idempotent transfer map if and only if \(A\) is an RFP:
Let \(A\) be an irreducible MPS tensor with \(D {\gt} 0\) and some \(A^i \neq 0\). Then there exist a positive real \(r\), a positive definite matrix \(\sigma \), and a tensor \(B\) gauge-equivalent to \(r^{-1/2}A\) such that
and \(\sum _i (B^i)^\dagger B^i = \mathbb {1}\).
This is the “spectral rescaling \(+\) TP gauge” step of [ CPGSV16 , Appendix A ] . The similarity is generally non-unitary.
For any MPS tensor \(A\), there exist nontrivial blocks \((B_k)_{k=1}^r\) with nonzero weights \((\mu _k)_{k=1}^r\), each block irreducible, left-canonical \((\sum _i(B_k^i)^\dagger B_k^i=\mathbb {1})\), and of positive bond dimension, such that, for every \(N\ge 1\) and every \(\sigma \),
and \(\sum _{k=1}^rD_k\le D\).
Let \(\sigma \) be positive definite and satisfy \(\sum _i (A^i)^\dagger \sigma A^i = \sigma \). Define
Then \(B\) is trace-preserving: \(\sum _i (B^i)^\dagger B^i = \mathbb {1}\).
For any MPS tensor \(A\), there exist \(p\ge 1\), nonzero weights \((\mu _k)_{k=1}^r\), and blocks \((B_k)_{k=1}^r\) such that, for every blocked \(\sigma \) of positive length \(N\),
The retained block dimensions satisfy \(\sum _{k=1}^{r}D_k\le D\). Each block is left-canonical and primitive:
Each bond dimension is positive.
Let \(A\) be a left-canonical MPS tensor with \(D{\gt}0\). Suppose that \(A\) is tensor-irreducible and that its transfer map is primitive. Then there exists a positive blocking length \(L\) such that \(A^{[L]}\) is one-site injective.
Let \(A\) have positive bond dimension and be trace-preserving, primitive, and tensor-irreducible. For every \(k{\gt}0\),
and \(A^{[k]}\) is tensor-irreducible. This \(k\) is a later common-refinement or injectivity length, distinct from the period-removal length that produced the sector block.
For a linear map \(T\colon M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) with Choi matrix \(\tau _T\) and any bipartite matrix \(\rho \) on \(\mathbb {C}^D\otimes \mathbb {C}^D\),
where \(T^{*}\) is the trace-pairing adjoint of \(T\).
For a nonempty closed chain, the trace of the word \(A^{\sigma _0}\cdots A^{\sigma _{L-1}}\) is the sum over cyclic virtual-index configurations:
Let \(A\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be Hermitian and suppose that \(\operatorname{Re}\operatorname{tr}(A)\ge 0\). If
then \(A\) is positive semidefinite.
This is the trace-non-negative form of the converse in [ Wol12 , Proposition 3.9 ] . The unrestricted squared implication printed there is false without a trace-sign condition: for \(A=-\mathbb {1}\), one has \(\operatorname{tr}(A)^2=D^2\ge D(D-1)=(D-1)\operatorname{tr}(A^2)\), although \(A\) is not positive semidefinite.
For every \(A\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), with \(\lvert A\rvert =\sqrt{A^\dagger A}\) the positive-semidefinite square root of \(A^\dagger A\),
This is the formula \(\lVert A\rVert _1=\operatorname{tr}[\lvert A\rvert ]\) of [ Wol12 , Chapter 8, Section 8.1 ] ; the trace of the positive-semidefinite matrix \(\lvert A\rvert \) is real.
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D'}(\mathbb {C})\) be a trace-preserving positive linear map. Then for all Hermitian \(H\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), \(\lVert T(H)\rVert _{\operatorname{tr}}\leq \lVert H\rVert _{\operatorname{tr}}\). See [ Wol12 , Chapter 8, Theorem 8.16 ] .
For every \(A\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\),
Also, \(\lVert A\rVert _{\operatorname{tr}}=0\) if and only if \(A=0\). Equivalently, \(\lVert A\rVert _{\operatorname{tr}}{\gt}0\) if and only if \(A\neq 0\).
The Schatten one-norm and trace norm are the sums over the finite support of the singular-value sequence. Equivalently, the trace norm is the sum over the indices below the rank of the represented linear map.
For all \(A,B\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), \(\lVert A+B\rVert _{\operatorname{tr}} \leq \lVert A\rVert _{\operatorname{tr}}+\lVert B\rVert _{\operatorname{tr}}\). Together with homogeneity (Theorem 21.1.6) and definiteness (Theorem 21.1.4), this completes the norm axioms of [ Wol12 , Chapter 8, Section 8.1 ] for the trace norm.
For all unitaries \(U,V\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) and every \(A\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\),
The trace norm is thus unitarily invariant [ Wol12 , Chapter 8, Section 8.1 ] .
For every \(A\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\),
and the maximum is attained: some unitary \(U\) satisfies \(\operatorname{tr}[A^\dagger U]=\lVert A\rVert _{\operatorname{tr}}\). See [ Wol12 , Chapter 8, Eq. (8.11) ] .
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D'}(\mathbb {C})\) be a positive map such that \(T^*(\mathbb {1})\) is positive definite. Put \(X=(T^*(\mathbb {1}))^{-1/2}\). Then \(\rho \mapsto T(X\rho X^\dagger )\) is positive and trace-preserving.
For every linear map \(E : M_{D}(\mathbb {C}) \to M_{D'}(\mathbb {C})\), every \(\rho \in M_{D'}(\mathbb {C})\), and every \(X \in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), one has
Let \(E\) be trace-preserving with fixed point \(\rho \), where \(\operatorname{tr}(\rho )\neq 0\), and let \(P\) be the fixed-point projection of Definition 4.9.1. If \(\rho _{\operatorname{spec}}(E-P){\lt}1\), then \(\operatorname{Tr}(E^n)\to 1\) as \(n\to \infty \).
On any finite full matrix algebra, a linear endomorphism \(S\) is trace-preserving if and only if its trace-pairing adjoint fixes the identity:
For \(p\in [0,1]\), PSD matrices \(A_1,A_2\), and \(t\in [0,1]\),
This follows from operator concavity of \(x\mapsto x^p\) composed with trace monotonicity on the Loewner order.
For \(p\in [1,2]\), PSD matrices \(A_1,A_2\), and \(t\in [0,1]\),
This follows from operator convexity of \(x\mapsto x^p\) composed with trace monotonicity on the Loewner order.
Let \(A\) be an injective left-canonical RFP tensor with positive-definite fixed point \(\rho \) of the transfer map \(\mathcal{E}_A\). Then \(\mathcal{E}_A = P_\rho \), where \(P_\rho (X) = \frac{\operatorname{tr}(X)}{\operatorname{tr}(\rho )} \rho \) is the rank-one fixed-point projection.
Every invertible transfer matrix \(\widehat{T}\) of a linear super-operator \(T : M_{D}(\mathbb {C}) \to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) admits a singular value decomposition \(\widehat{T}=U\operatorname{diag}(\sigma )V^{\dagger }\) with \(U,V\) unitary on \(\mathbb {C}^{D}\otimes \mathbb {C}^{D}\) and \(\sigma _i{\gt}0\).
The matrix transposition map \(\theta (X)=X^T\) on \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) is positive and trace-preserving.
For \(P\geq 0\), \(\widehat P_{AX}P=P=P\widehat P_{AX}\).
If \(P=P^\dagger \) and \(A\) and \(B\) are decorrelated, then
Let \(P\), \(P_{AX}\), and \(P_{XB}\) be orthogonal projectors, and write their lifts to the tripartite space as \(\widehat P_{AX}=P_{AX}\otimes \mathbb {1}_B\) and \(\widehat P_{XB}=\mathbb {1}_A\otimes P_{XB}\). Suppose that the lifted projectors commute, \(\widehat P_{AX}\widehat P_{XB} =\widehat P_{XB}\widehat P_{AX}\). Then
This is the passage from [ CPGSV16 , Definition D.2, lines 2205–2218 ] to the projector identity at lines 2279–2289.
For matrix units on \(A\) and \(B\),
Let \(P=P^\dagger =P^2\). Then \(P\) is the ground-space projector of a parent commuting Hamiltonian on \(AX\) and \(XB\) if and only if regions \(A\) and \(B\) satisfy complex-linear decorrelation.
Let \(P=P^\dagger =P^2\). Then \(P\) is the ground-space projector of a parent commuting Hamiltonian on \(AX\) and \(XB\) if and only if regions \(A\) and \(B\) are decorrelated when tested on Hermitian observables. This is [ CPGSV16 , Proposition D.3, lines 2221–2289 ] .
If \(P=P^\dagger =P^2\) and \(A\) and \(B\) are decorrelated relative to \(P\), then
For \(P\geq 0\), \(\widehat P_{XB}P=P=P\widehat P_{XB}\).
Assume \(\mathcal{E}_A(\mathbb {1})=\mathbb {1}\) and that, for every physical index \(i\), \(\sum _j u_{ij} A^j = \mu \, V A^i V^\dagger \) with \(V\) unitary. Then \(V\) is an eigenmatrix of the twisted transfer map:
Let \(A\) be an injective MPS tensor with \(\mathcal{E}_A(\mathbb {1})=\mathbb {1}\), and let \(u\) satisfy \(u u^\dagger = \mathbb {1}\). If
for some nonzero \(X \in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) with \(|\lambda |=1\), then \(A\) is gauge-phase equivalent to the companion tensor \(B_u\).
Let \(A\) be an injective MPS tensor with \(\mathcal{E}_A(\mathbb {1})=\mathbb {1}\), and let \(u\) satisfy \(u u^\dagger = \mathbb {1}\). If \(\mathcal{E}_u(X) = \lambda X\) for some nonzero \(X \in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), then \(|\lambda | \le 1\).
Let \(N\in \mathbb {N}\) with \(N\ge 1\), let \(p\ge 0\) and \(\gamma _*{\gt}0\), and let \(\rho _t=\Phi _t(\rho )\) for matrices \(\rho ,\omega \in M_{2^N}(\mathbb {C})\). Assume at the time under consideration that
If
then \(\lVert \rho _t-\omega \rVert _1\le N^{-p}\). The complete modified logarithmic Sobolev estimate motivating the first hypothesis is [ GR22 , Theorems 1.1 and 3.3 ] ; that estimate, its tensorization, and quantum Pinsker remain hypotheses here.
- PauliDissipation.q3_traceNorm_le_rpow_of_logarithmic_time
- PauliDissipation.squared_trace_distance_bound_of_entropy_decay_and_pinsker
- PauliDissipation.squared_trace_distance_le_rpow_of_exp_threshold
- PauliDissipation.q3_traceNorm_sq_bound_of_entropy_decay_and_pinsker
- PauliDissipation.q3_exp_threshold_of_logarithmic_time
Suppose \(a\ne b\) and \(\gamma _a,\gamma _b{\gt}0\). For \(X\in M_{2}(\mathbb {C})\), \(\mathcal L_{a,b}(X)=0\) if and only if \(X\in \mathbb {C}\mathbb {1}\).
For Pauli directions \(a,b,k\in \{ x,y,z\} \) and real rates \(\gamma _a,\gamma _b\),
Hence, when \(a\ne b\), the eigenvalues on \(\sigma _a\), \(\sigma _b\), and the remaining Pauli matrix are respectively \(-2\gamma _b\), \(-2\gamma _a\), and \(-2(\gamma _a+\gamma _b)\).
For Pauli directions \(a,b\in \{ x,y,z\} \), real rates \(\gamma _a,\gamma _b\), and all \(X,Y\in M_{2}(\mathbb {C})\),
Suppose \(a\ne b\) and \(\gamma _a,\gamma _b{\gt}0\). The state \(\tau _1\) is positive definite and belongs to \(\mathcal{D}_2\). Furthermore, \(\mathcal L_{a,b}(\tau _1)=0\), the kernel of \(\mathcal L_{a,b}\) is the one-dimensional space \(\mathbb {C}\tau _1\), and \(e^{t\mathcal L_{a,b}}(\tau _1)=\tau _1\) for every \(t\ge 0\). More generally, for \(X\in M_{2}(\mathbb {C})\),
The same equivalence holds for any autonomous semigroup \(T_t\) satisfying \(T_t=e^{t\mathcal L_{a,b}}\) at every non-negative time.
- PauliDissipation.twoPauliGenerator_hasSimpleFaithfulKernel
- PauliDissipation.maximallyMixed_posDef
- PauliDissipation.maximallyMixed_mem_densityMatrices
- PauliDissipation.twoPauliGenerator_maximallyMixed
- PauliDissipation.twoPauliGenerator_hasSimpleKernel
- PauliDissipation.expSemigroup_fixed_iff_scalar
- PauliDissipation.autonomousSemigroup_fixed_iff_scalar
- PauliDissipation.expSemigroup_fixes_maximallyMixed
Suppose that the canonical length-two parent terms of \(A\) commute on a three-site chain. Then \(Q_A\) is Hermitian, and its natural placements on the first and last pairs of a three-fold tensor product commute:
Under the preceding hypothesis, there are positive integers \(d_q,m_q\), a unitary identification
and Hermitian matrices \(R_q\) on \(\mathcal H\otimes \mathcal H_{q,l}\) and \(S_q\) on \(\mathcal H_{q,r}\otimes \mathcal H\) such that, after conjugating the middle site by this unitary, the first identity below holds on the first pair and the second on the last pair:
This is the spatial decomposition of [ Bei12 , Lemma 2.1 ] for the canonical parent interaction.
Let \(A\) and \(B\) have the same MPV family at every positive length. Then there is a positive blocking length at which both blocked tensors have the same positive-length MPV family as weighted direct sums of trace-preserving, primitive, tensor-irreducible blocks with positive bond dimensions and nonzero weights. The two weighted nonzero-sector families have the same positive-length MPV family.
If \(A\) is normal, becomes injective after blocking \(L_0 {\gt} 0\) sites, and \(D \ge 1\), then the parent Hamiltonian with interaction range \(L_0 + 1\) has a unique ground state on every periodic chain with \(L_0+1{\lt}N\).
Let \(A\) be an irreducible MPS tensor with \(D {\gt} 0\) and some \(A^i \neq 0\). Then there exist a positive real \(r\), a positive definite matrix \(\rho \), and a tensor \(B\) gauge-equivalent to \(r^{-1/2}A\) such that
and \(\sum _i B^i(B^i)^\dagger = \mathbb {1}\).
This is the Perron–Frobenius unital-gauge orientation used in [ PGVWC07 , Theorem 4, lines 765–770 ] , stated for one irreducible nonzero block.
Let \(\rho \) be positive definite with \(\mathcal{E}_A(\rho )=r\rho \) for some \(r{\gt}0\). For \(B^i:=r^{-1/2}\rho ^{-1/2}A^i\rho ^{1/2}\),
If \(r=1\), then the unscaled gauge \(B^i:=\rho ^{-1/2}A^i\rho ^{1/2}\) is unital and generates the same MPV family as \(A\). This is the spectral-radius normalization and full-rank fixed-point gauge of [ PGVWC07 , Theorem 4 ] .
Suppose \(A\) is unital, \(\mathcal{E}_A(\mathbb {1})=\mathbb {1}\). If \(X\) is a Hermitian fixed point of \(\mathcal{E}_A\) which is not a scalar multiple of \(\mathbb {1}\), then there is a nonzero PSD fixed point \(\rho \) which is not positive definite, and consequently \(A\) admits a two-block MPV-equivalent decomposition with both block dimensions strictly smaller than \(D\). This is the fixed-point shift and further decomposition step in [ PGVWC07 , Theorem 4 ] .
Let \(M\) be an MPO tensor whose doubled-index MPS tensor is in the literal CPSV canonical form. If \(M\) generates matrix product density operators, then \(M\) is in canonical form in the vertical direction. More precisely, there is a basis of normal tensors \(\{ M_\alpha \} _\alpha \) for the vertically viewed tensor \(\widetilde M\), together with positive diagonal matrices \(\mu _\alpha \) and a coisometry \(U\) from the physical space onto the retained nonzero sectors. Writing \(B=\bigoplus _\alpha \mu _\alpha \otimes M_\alpha \), one has
The source explicitly displays (??) and calls \(U\) an isometry [ CPGSV16 , Proposition 4.13 ] . In this rectangular orientation, however, \(U\) maps the physical space onto the retained sector space and satisfies (??); thus \(U\) is a coisometry and \(U^\dagger \) is the isometric inclusion. The reverse identity (??) is not displayed separately in the proposition. It records the exact reconstruction implicit in the preceding assertion that \(\widetilde M\) is itself in canonical form, including the permitted zero orthogonal complement.
Let \(\{ A_\alpha \} _{\alpha =0}^{g-1}\) be a BNT for the vertically viewed tensor \(\widetilde M\). For each \(\alpha \), let \(r_\alpha {\gt}0\), let \(\omega _{\alpha ,q}{\gt}0\) for \(0\leq q{\lt}r_\alpha \), and let \(W_{\alpha ,q}:\mathbb {C}^{D_\alpha }\to \mathbb {C}^d\) satisfy
Suppose that, for every vertical letter \(v\) and every pair \((\alpha ,q)\), \(\widetilde M_vW_{\alpha ,q} =W_{\alpha ,q}(\omega _{\alpha ,q}A_\alpha ^v)\), and that the letters have the exact sector decomposition
Then \(M\) is in vertical canonical form. This is the final finite-dimensional implication in [ CPGSV16 , Proposition 4.13, lines 1863–1870 ] .
A tensor in normalized BNT-refined horizontal form that generates matrix product density operators is also in canonical form in the vertical direction: there exist a basis of normal tensors \(\{ M_\alpha \} _\alpha \) for the vertically viewed tensor \(\widetilde M\), positive diagonal matrices \(\mu _\alpha \), and a coisometry \(U\) from the physical space onto the retained nonzero sectors. Writing \(B=\bigoplus _\alpha \mu _\alpha \otimes M_\alpha \), one has
The conclusion includes the basis-of-normal-tensors condition in [ CPGSV16 , Proposition 4.13 ] , together with the positive weights and the coisometric realization. Its hypothesis is the normalized BNT-refined form of Definition 23.4.1, rather than the literal CPSV canonical form assumed in Theorem 23.4.99.
Suppose that
and, for every letter \(v\) and every sector \(k\), \(T_vW_k=W_kB_k^v\). Then the block-row map \(U\) is a coisometry and conjugates \(T\) to the direct sum of the sector tensors:
If the letters also satisfy the literal sector decomposition
then
This last equality is a conditional consequence of (??); no additional assertion from the source is used.
Let \(A\) be an injective MPS tensor that is on-site symmetric under a group representation \(U : G \to \mathrm{GL}_{d}(\mathbb {C})\). Then there exist:
a scalar 2-cochain \(\omega : G \times G \to \mathbb {C}^{\times }\), and
a map \(\rho : G \to \mathrm{GL}_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) satisfying, for all \(g,h \in G\),
\begin{align} \rho (g) \rho (h) & =\omega (g,h) \rho (gh). \notag \end{align}
such that, defining the gauge matrices \(X(g):=\rho (g^{-1})\), one has, for every \(g \in G\) and \(i \in \{ 0,\ldots ,d{-}1\} \),
In tensor-network notation, for each fixed \(g\) this is the local gauge relation
with the black node denoting the tensor named in the surrounding formula and the two red side nodes acting on the virtual legs. In particular, \(\rho \) is a projective representation of \(G\) on the bond space \(\mathbb {C}^D\).
If \(A\) is injective and on-site symmetric under \(U\), then for every \(g \in G\) there exist an invertible matrix \(X(g) \in \mathrm{GL}_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) and a nonzero scalar \(\varphi (g) \in \mathbb {C}^{\times }\) (in fact \(\varphi =1\) in the single-block case) such that, for every physical index \(i\),
For an injective MPS, let \(\Lambda \in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), and assume \(u u^\dagger = \mathbb {1}\) and \(\mathcal{E}_A(\mathbb {1})=\mathbb {1}\). If virtual-boundary nondecay holds for \(u\) with boundary parameter \(\Lambda \), then there exists a virtual unitary \(V\) and a unit-modulus scalar \(\mu \) such that \(\sum _j u_{ij} A^j = \mu \, V A^i V^\dagger \) for all \(i\). Diagrammatically this is the same local intertwining relation, but only up to an overall unit scalar on the virtual side:
Let \(A\) be injective, assume \(u u^\dagger = \mathbb {1}\) and \(\mathcal{E}_A(\mathbb {1})=\mathbb {1}\). If \(A\) is gauge-phase equivalent to the companion tensor \(B_u\), then there exist a unitary \(V\) and a phase \(\mu \) with \(|\mu |=1\) such that, for every physical index \(i\),
For every \(N\), the open-boundary state of the W tensor with boundary vectors \((0|\) and \(|1)\) equals the W state:
On three sites, each of the three single-excitation configurations \(|100\rangle \), \(|010\rangle \), \(|001\rangle \) receives W-state amplitude \(1\), while the vacuum \(|000\rangle \) and the doubly-excited \(|110\rangle \) receive amplitude \(0\).
Let \(T(X)=\sum _iK_iXK_i^\dagger \) be trace-preserving and let \(\rho \succeq 0\) be a fixed point of \(T\) whose rank bounds the rank of every fixed-point density matrix. Then every fixed point \(X\) of \(T\) arises as \(X=\sqrt{\rho }\, Y\sqrt{\rho }\) for a corner-supported \(Y\) with \(\sqrt{\rho }\, Y\sqrt{\rho }\) fixed by \(T\).
In the setting of Theorem 25.7.15, every fixed point \(X\) of \(T\) with \(QXQ=X\) arises as \(X=\sqrt{\rho }\, Y\sqrt{\rho }\) for a corner-supported \(Y\) with \(\sqrt{\rho }\, Y\sqrt{\rho }\) fixed by \(T\).
Let \(T(X)=\sum _iK_iXK_i^\dagger \) be trace-preserving, let \(\rho \succeq 0\) satisfy \(T(\rho )=\rho \), and let \(Q\) be the support projection of \(\rho \). The corner elements \(Y\in QM_{D}(\mathbb {C})Q\) such that \(\sqrt{\rho }\, Y\sqrt{\rho }\) is a fixed point of \(T\) form a \(*\)-subalgebra of the corner algebra \(QM_{D}(\mathbb {C})Q\).
Let \(T(X)=\sum _iK_iXK_i^\dagger \) be trace-preserving, and let \(\rho {\gt}0\) satisfy \(T(\rho )=\rho \). If \(F_T:=\{ X\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\mid T(X)=X\} \), then \(\rho ^{-1/2}F_T\rho ^{-1/2}\) is a \(*\)-subalgebra of \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\).
Let \(\rho \) and \(\sigma \) be matrices on \(\mathcal H_S\otimes \mathbb C^{d_C}\), with \(\sigma \) positive semidefinite, and set \(\overline\sigma =(\operatorname{tr}_C\sigma )\otimes d_C^{-1}\mathbf1_C\). If the identity summand obeys the support sandwich identity
then the raw support Petz map recovers \(\rho \): \(\mathcal R_\sigma (\operatorname{tr}_C\rho )=\rho \). This is the algebraic reduction in [ HJPW04 , Theorem 3, equation (8) ] . It does not derive the support sandwich identity from equality of relative entropies.
Fix a dimension \(d\ge 1\) and a primitive \(d\)-th root of unity \(\zeta \). The cyclic shift \(X\), the clock operator \(Z\), and every Weyl operator \(W(a,b)=X^aZ^b\) are unitary.
For the positive definite finite-Weyl family, let
and define \(\operatorname{Def}_B(t)\) analogously, with the real parts of the corresponding source-\(B\) pairings. Then both defects are non-negative and continuous for \(t{\gt}0\), and
The integrand is continuous, non-negative, and integrable on \((0,\infty )\). The coefficient of the source-\(B\) defect is exactly \(t\), as prescribed by the integral formula and equality analysis of Jenčová–Ruskai, arXiv:0903.2895v4, §4.
- Matrix.weightedWeylConjugate
- Matrix.weightedWeylAverage
- Matrix.weylSourceAResolventDefect
- Matrix.weylSourceBResolventDefect
- Matrix.weylRelativeEntropyGap
- Matrix.weyl_relativeEntropy_gap_integral
- Matrix.weylSourceAResolventDefect_continuousOn
- Matrix.weylSourceBResolventDefect_continuousOn
- Matrix.weylSourceAResolventDefect_nonneg
- Matrix.weylSourceBResolventDefect_nonneg
- Matrix.weylRelativeEntropyGapIntegrand_integrableOn
- Matrix.weylRelativeEntropyGapIntegrand_continuousOn
- Matrix.weylRelativeEntropyGapIntegrand_nonneg
Under the positive-definite finite-Weyl hypotheses, suppose that \(\sum _gD(A_g\Vert B_g)-D(A\Vert B)=0\). Then \(\operatorname{Def}_B(t)=0\) for every \(t{\gt}0\), and consequently \(T_g^{-1}(B_g)=T^{-1}(B)\) for every \(t{\gt}0\) and every Weyl index \(g\). In particular, equality of relative entropy under the right partial trace implies this conclusion by Theorem 21.4.12. This is the positive-definite conclusion of the equality argument in Jenčová–Ruskai, arXiv:0903.2895v4, §4 and Appendix. It makes no assertion at \(t=0\) or for singular inputs.
Let \(\rho \) and \(\sigma \) be positive definite on \(\mathcal H_S\otimes \mathbb C^{d_C}\), let \(q=d_C^{-2}\), and put
where \(U_g=\mathbf1_S\otimes W_g\). For \(t{\gt}0\), let
Then
This is the positive-definite, fixed-\(t\) identity in Jenčová–Ruskai, arXiv:0903.2895v4, Appendix, lines 1313–1343. It does not infer zero defect from equality of relative entropies and makes no assertion about singular supports.
Under the hypotheses and notation of the preceding theorem, suppose that
Then \(T_g^{-1}(B_g)=T^{-1}(B)\) for every Weyl index \(g\). In particular this holds for the identity Weyl element \(g=(0,0)\). This is the common-resolvent conclusion in Jenčová–Ruskai, arXiv:0903.2895v4, §4, lines 652–674; its squared-defect input is in Appendix, lines 1313–1343. This fixed-\(t\), positive-definite conclusion does not assert that equality of relative entropies implies the scalar hypothesis in (??).
Under the notation of Theorem 21.4.21, set \(\Gamma _t=T^{-1}(A)\). Then, for every \(t{\gt}0\),
This is the second defect family in Jenčová–Ruskai, arXiv:0903.2895v4, §4 and Appendix.
Fix a dimension \(d\ge 1\) and a primitive \(d\)-th root of unity \(\zeta \), and let \(X\) be the cyclic shift \(|i\rangle \mapsto |i+1\rangle \) and \(Z=\operatorname{diag}(\zeta ^0,\ldots ,\zeta ^{d-1})\) the clock operator. For every matrix \(M\) on \(\mathbb {C}^d\), the uniform average of the conjugations by the \(d^2\) Weyl operators \(W(a,b)=X^aZ^b\) is the completely depolarizing channel:
Suppose \(A\) has bond dimension \(D{\gt}0\), is normal, and \(L{\gt}0\), and we have:
a word \(w_0\) of length \(L\) with eigenvector \(A^{w_0}\varphi =\mu \varphi \) (\(\mu \neq 0\), \(\varphi \neq 0\)),
a word \(\tau _0\) of length \(L\) with transpose eigenvector \((A^{\tau _0})^T\psi =\nu \psi \) (\(\nu \neq 0\), \(\psi \neq 0\)),
a rank-one element \(\varphi \psi ^T\in S_m(A^{[L]})\) for some \(m\).
Then there exists \(N\) such that \(S_N(A)=M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\).
Remark. The proof gives the explicit bound \(N=((D{-}1)+m+(D{-}1))L\); the theorem states only the existential conclusion.
Let \(A\) be a normal MPS tensor with bond dimension \(D{\gt}0\), and suppose that some Kraus operator \(A^{i_0}\) is invertible. Then
Let \(A\) be an MPS tensor with bond dimension \(D\ge 1\), satisfying \(\sum _i(A^i)^\dagger A^i=\mathbb {1}\), and suppose that \(A\) is primitive in the sense of Definition 8.1.1.3. If \(S_1(A)\) contains an invertible matrix \(X\), then
In the terminology of [ SPGWC10 ] , this is the case where the first application space \(S_1(A)\) contains an invertible operator. This is the exact word-span form of [ SPGWC10 , Theorem 1, case (2) ] .
Let \(A\) be an MPS tensor with bond dimension \(D\ge 1\), satisfying \(\sum _i(A^i)^\dagger A^i=\mathbb {1}\), and suppose that \(A\) is primitive in the sense of Definition 8.1.1.3. If \(S_1(A)\) contains a non-invertible matrix \(X\) with a nonzero eigenvalue, then \(S_{D^2}(A)=M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\). More explicitly, it is enough to have \(X\varphi =\mu \varphi \) with \(\varphi \neq 0\) and \(\mu \neq 0\). In the terminology of [ SPGWC10 ] , this is the case where the first application space \(S_1(A)\) contains a non-invertible operator with a nonzero eigenvalue. This is the exact word-span form of [ SPGWC10 , Theorem 1, case (3) ] .
Let \(A\) be a normalized MPS tensor with \(D{\gt}0\), \(\sum _i(A^i)^\dagger A^i=\mathbb {1}\), that is primitive in the sense of Definition 8.1.1.3. Then
where \(\iota (A)=\min \{ n\ge 1:S_n(A)=M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\} \) is the full-Kraus-rank index. This is [ SPGWC10 , Theorem 1, case (1) ] .
If \(A\) is a normal MPS tensor with bond dimension \(D{\gt}0\), then there exists \(N\) such that \(S_N(A)=M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\). This is a blocked fixed-length construction under the stated normality hypothesis. The quantitative result of [ SPGWC10 , Lemma 2(b) ] is Theorem 8.4.5.
Let \(D{\gt}0\) and suppose \(\sum _i(A^i)^\dagger A^i=\mathbb {1}\). The following are equivalent:
there is a positive \(q\) for which \(H_q(A,\varphi )=\mathbb {C}^D\) for every \(\varphi \neq 0\);
there is a positive \(i\) for which \(S_i(A)=M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\);
\(\mathcal{E}_A\) is strongly irreducible.
Proposition 3 of [ SPGWC10 ] states the same equivalence with item (3) replaced by the literal source condition: \(1\) is the only peripheral eigenvalue, and its one-dimensional eigenspace is generated by a positive-definite fixed point. Here item (3) includes the additional irreducibility condition.
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be positive and trace preserving, and suppose that \(T^*\) satisfies the Schwarz inequality. There are positive integers \(d_k,m_k\), positive definite density matrices \(\sigma _k\in M_{m_k}(\mathbb {C})\), a non-negative integer \(d_0\), and a unitary \(U\) associated with a decomposition
This is [ Wol12 , Theorem 6.14 and Equation (6.63) ] . The two tensor factors are interchanged from the displayed convention in the reference; the interchange is a unitary change of basis on each summand.
Let \(E\) be a completely positive map on \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\). Then \(E\) is irreducible if and only if, for every \(t{\gt}0\) and every nonzero \(A\geq 0\), one has \(\exp (tE)(A){\gt}0\). This is the completely positive specialization of the equivalence in [ Wol12 , Theorem 6.2(3) ] ; Theorem 6.8.1 is its forward implication.
For a GKSL generator \(L:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), the four conditions
rank-deficient fixed density,
rank-deficient kernel element,
invariant compression, and
block-upper-triangular Lindblad form
are equivalent. This is [ Wol12 , Proposition 7.6 ] .
Let \(A\) be a tensor whose length-\(K\) word products span \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\). Let \(\{ F_b\} _{b\in B}\) and \(\{ Z_b\} _{b\in B}\) be two families of matrices. If, for every length-\(K\) word \(w\), there is a matrix \(Y_w\) such that \(Z_b A^w = F_bY_w\) for every \(b\in B\), then there is a single matrix \(Y\) such that \(Z_b = F_bY\) for every \(b\in B\).
For every \(n\),
Consequently, if \(L{\gt}0\) and \(A\) is \(L\)-block injective, then \(A\) is \(m\)-block injective for every \(m\ge L\). This auxiliary length-shift statement combines the block-injectivity discussion in [ CPGSV16 , Section II ] with [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.3, Lemma L ] ; it is not stated there as a separate lemma.
Suppose
and \(S_L(A)=M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\). Then \(S_m(A)=M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) for every \(m\ge L\). Equivalently, \(L\)-block injectivity propagates to every larger homogeneous length.
Let \(A\) be \(L_0\)-block-injective with \(L_0{\gt}0\) and \(D\ge 1\), let \(N\ge 2\), \(L_0+1{\lt}N\), and \(L_0{\lt}L\le N\), and let \(\psi \in \mathcal G_{N,L}(A)\) have an open-chain representation \(\psi =\Gamma _N(X)\). Suppose \(Y^{+}\) and \(Y^{-}\) are two families of matrices obtained from the two boundary-crossing cyclic-window constraints, and that they satisfy, for every physical letter \(j\) and every boundary condition \(\tau \),
For every physical letter \(\eta \in \{ 0,\ldots ,d{-}1\} \) and every word \(\mu \) on the complementary sites, define two boundary conditions by
Then the two families agree on these two boundary conditions: \(Y^{+}_{\tau ^{+}_{\eta }(\mu )} = Y^{-}_{\tau ^{-}_{\eta }(\mu )}\). This is the boundary-matrix comparison required for equality of the two restrictions crossing the periodic cut.
The auxiliary conjunction \((\mathcal{E}_A^2=\mathcal{E}_A\ \text{and virtual-insertion distance independence})\) is equivalent to \(\mathcal{E}_A^2=\mathcal{E}_A\). This is a logical simplification of the auxiliary convention, not the physical ZCL theorem of [ CPGSV16 , Theorem 3.8 ] .
Let \(P\) be an auxiliary BNT sector decomposition, let \(A=\bigoplus _k A_k\), and fix a sector \(j\). Suppose there are matrices \(r,l\in M_{D_j}(\mathbb {C})\) and a scalar \(\lambda \ne 0\) with \(|\lambda |{\lt}1\) such that
Then \(A\) does not have positive-gap physical CID.