I Positive but Not Completely Positive Maps: Supporting Results
This appendix supports Chapter 22. It proves the positive-filter identities used in trace normalization, the Schmidt-rank linear algebra behind the maximal-overlap theorem, the extremal projection bounds in Ky Fan’s maximum principle, the right-tensor identities behind the Choi-compression criteria, and the elementary closure properties of \(k\)-positive maps.
I.1 Positive filters and trace normalization
This section proves the normalization and invertibility steps used in Lemma 22.1.1. Here \(T^*\) denotes the adjoint for the trace pairing, \(\mathbb {1}\) is the identity matrix, and \(A^{-1/2}\) denotes the inverse of the positive square root of a positive definite matrix.
For every \(X\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), the conjugation filter \(\rho \mapsto X\rho X^\dagger \) is completely positive, hence positive. Therefore, if \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) is positive, then \(\rho \mapsto T(X\rho X^\dagger )\) is positive. If in addition \(X^\dagger X=\mathbb {1}\), then the conjugation filter is trace-preserving and hence is a quantum channel.
Complete positivity follows from the Kraus representation (??) with the single Kraus operator \(X\). Positivity follows immediately. If \(X^\dagger X=\mathbb {1}\), cyclicity of the trace gives \(\operatorname{tr}(X\rho X^\dagger )=\operatorname{tr}(X^\dagger X\rho )=\operatorname{tr}(\rho )\).
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D'}(\mathbb {C})\) be a linear map and let \(X\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) satisfy \(X^\dagger T^*(\mathbb {1})X=\mathbb {1}\). Then, for every \(\rho \in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\),
Expanding with the trace-pairing adjoint gives
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D'}(\mathbb {C})\) be a positive map between matrix algebras of possibly different dimensions, and let \(X\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) satisfy \(X^\dagger T^*(\mathbb {1})X=\mathbb {1}\), where \(T^*\) is the trace-pairing adjoint. Then \(\rho \mapsto T(X\rho X^\dagger )\) is positive and trace-preserving.
This is the algebraic trace-normalization step in the proof of [ Wol12 , Chapter 3, Lemma “Making positive maps trace preserving” ] . The inverse-square-root choice is recorded in the next theorem.
By Theorem I.1.1, \(X\rho X^\dagger \) is positive whenever \(\rho \) is positive; positivity of \(T\) therefore makes the filtered map positive. For trace preservation, the trace-pairing adjoint identity and cyclicity of the trace give
Let \(A\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be positive definite and set \(S=A^{1/2}\). Then
Since \(A\) is positive definite, \(S\) is invertible and self-adjoint, and \(S^2=A\). Therefore \((S^{-1})^\dagger A S^{-1}=S^{-1}S^2S^{-1}=\mathbb {1}\).
If \(A\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) is positive definite, then \((A^{1/2})^{-1}\) is invertible.
A positive definite matrix is invertible, hence so is its square root \(A^{1/2}\), and the inverse of an invertible matrix is invertible.
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D'}(\mathbb {C})\) be a positive map such that \(T^*(\mathbb {1})\) is positive definite. Put \(X=(T^*(\mathbb {1}))^{-1/2}\). Then \(\rho \mapsto T(X\rho X^\dagger )\) is positive and trace-preserving.
Let \(S=(T^*(\mathbb {1}))^{1/2}\). Since \(T^*(\mathbb {1})\) is positive definite, \(S\) is invertible and self-adjoint, and \(S^2=T^*(\mathbb {1})\). For \(X=S^{-1}\),
Theorem I.1.3 applies.
Consequently, the inverse-square-root filter used in Lemma 22.1.1 is invertible and satisfies the required normalization identity.
I.2 Schmidt-rank factorization and spectral expansions
This section supplies the bounded-rank factorizations and spectral identities used in Theorems 22.2.2.3, 22.2.2.6, and 22.2.2.7. The coefficient matrix of a bipartite vector identifies Schmidt rank with ordinary matrix rank; reduced densities and eigenbasis expansions then express the relevant overlaps and quadratic forms.
If \(\operatorname{SR}(\psi )\le k\) and \(k\le l\), then \(\operatorname{SR}(\psi )\le l\).
The hypothesis gives \(\operatorname{SR}(\psi )\le k\), and transitivity with \(k\le l\) gives \(\operatorname{SR}(\psi )\le l\).
If \(A\in M_{m,n}(\mathbb {C})(\mathbb {C})\) has rank at most \(k\), then there are matrices \(B\in M_{m,k}(\mathbb {C})(\mathbb {C})\) and \(C\in M_{k,n}(\mathbb {C})(\mathbb {C})\) such that \(BC=A\).
The range of the linear map represented by \(A\) has dimension at most \(k\). Embed this range into \(\mathbb {C}^k\), compose with the range map, and then map back to the ambient codomain. The corresponding matrices give the desired factorization.
Writing \(C_i\) for the coefficient matrix of \(\phi _i\), the reduced density operator factors as \(\rho _i=C_iC_i^\dagger \).
The partial trace of \(|\phi _i\rangle \! \langle \phi _i|\) over the second factor has entries \(\sum _b(C_i)_{a,b}\overline{(C_i)_{a',b}}\), which is the \((a,a')\) entry of \(C_iC_i^\dagger \).
The reduced density operator \(\rho _i\) is positive semidefinite.
By the coefficient-matrix form, \(\rho _i=C_iC_i^\dagger \), which is positive semidefinite for any matrix \(C_i\).
For a Hermitian operator \(\tau \) with eigenvalues \(\nu _i\) and normalized eigenvectors \(\phi _i\), the expectation in a vector \(\psi \) expands as
Diagonalizing \(\tau =U\operatorname{diag}(\nu _i)U^\dagger \) with \(U\) the unitary of eigenvectors, the change of variable \(y=U^\dagger \psi \) gives \(\langle \psi |\tau |\psi \rangle =\sum _i\nu _i|y_i|^2\), and \(y_i=\langle \phi _i | \psi \rangle \) is the \(i\)-th eigenvector overlap.
For a Hermitian operator \(\tau \) with normalized eigenvectors \(\phi _i\), the eigenvector overlaps recover the squared norm of \(\psi \):
The eigenvectors form an orthonormal basis, so with \(y=U^\dagger \psi \) one has \(\sum _i|\langle \phi _i | \psi \rangle |^2=\sum _i|y_i|^2=\| y\| ^2=\| \psi \| ^2\), where the last equality follows because \(U\) is unitary.
The factorization lemma gives coordinate representatives for bounded Schmidt rank, while the reduced-density and eigenbasis identities provide the Frobenius, Rayleigh, and Parseval formulas used in the main spectral bounds.
I.3 Ky Fan’s maximum principle
This section proves attainment and the matching upper bound used in Theorem 22.2.2.2. For Hermitian \(A\), write \(S_k(A)\) for the sum introduced in Definition 22.2.2.1.
For every Hermitian \(A\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) and every \(k\ge 0\), there is an orthogonal projection \(P\) of rank \(\min (k,D)\) with \(\operatorname{Re}\operatorname{tr}(PA)=S_k(A)\).
Diagonalize \(A=U\operatorname{diag}(\lambda _i)U^\dagger \) and take \(P\) to be the projection onto the span of the eigenvectors with the \(\min (k,D)\) largest eigenvalues. Then \(\operatorname{Re}\operatorname{tr}(PA)=\sum _{i\le k}\lambda _i=S_k(A)\).
For every Hermitian \(A\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) and every orthogonal projection \(P\) of rank \(k{\lt}D\), one has \(\operatorname{Re}\operatorname{tr}(PA)\le S_k(A)\).
Conjugating \(P\) by \(U\) gives an orthogonal projection \(Q\) of the same rank, and \(\operatorname{Re}\operatorname{tr}(PA)=\sum _iw_i\lambda _i\), where \(w_i\) are the diagonal entries of \(Q\). Each \(w_i\) lies in \([0,1]\) and the weights sum to \(\operatorname{tr}(P)=k\). With the threshold \(c=\lambda _{k+1}\),
since for \(i\le k\) the eigenvalues dominate \(c\) while \(1-w_i\ge 0\), and for \(i{\gt}k\) they are dominated by \(c\) while \(w_i\ge 0\).
Together, Theorems I.3.1 and I.3.2 prove Theorem 22.2.2.2, which supplies the projection estimate in the maximal-overlap theorem.
I.4 Right-tensor identities and Choi compressions
This section proves the matrix identities and rank parametrizations used in the Schmidt-rank Choi criterion, the rectangular compression criterion, and the rank-\(k\) projection criterion. Throughout, \(R_X\) and \(C_T(X)\) are the right-tensor factor and Choi compression of Definitions 22.2.3.2 and 22.2.3.1.
If \(\tau \) is the Choi matrix of \(T\), then
where \(C_T(X)\) is the right-factor Choi compression by \(X\).
By (??), the \((i,p),(j,q)\) entry of the left-hand side of (??) is
which is (??).
For \(X\in M_{D,k}(\mathbb {C})(\mathbb {C})\), the vector
has Schmidt rank at most \(k\).
The coefficient matrix of \(\psi _X\) is a scalar multiple of \(X\). Therefore its rank is bounded by the number of columns, which is \(k\).
Assume \(D{\gt}0\). For \(X\in M_{D,k}(\mathbb {C})(\mathbb {C})\), the vector \(\psi _X\) in (??) satisfies \(\operatorname{SR}(\psi _X)=\operatorname{rank}X\).
The coefficient matrix of \(\psi _X\) is \(D^{-1/2}X\). Since \(D{\gt}0\), the scalar \(D^{-1/2}\) is nonzero, and multiplication by this scalar preserves rank.
Assume \(D{\gt}0\). For every \(\psi \in \mathbb {C}^D\otimes \mathbb {C}^D\), there is \(X\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})(\mathbb {C})\) such that
In particular, if \(\operatorname{SR}(\psi )\le r\), then \(X\) may be chosen with \(\operatorname{rank}X\le r\).
Take \(X_{i,p}=D^{1/2}\psi _{(i,p)}\). Since \(D{\gt}0\), this gives \(D^{-1/2}X_{i,p}=\psi _{(i,p)}\). The rank identity follows from Theorem I.4.3. The bounded-rank statement follows by comparison with the assumed Schmidt-rank bound.
Assume \(D{\gt}0\). A vector \(\psi \in \mathbb {C}^D\otimes \mathbb {C}^D\) has Schmidt rank at most \(k\) if and only if there is a matrix \(X\in M_D(\mathbb {C})(\mathbb {C})\) of rank at most \(k\) such that \(\psi _{(i,j)}=D^{-1/2}X_{i,j}\).
The forward direction is the bounded-rank part of Theorem I.4.4. Conversely, if \(\psi _{(i,j)}=D^{-1/2}X_{i,j}\), then \(C_\psi =D^{-1/2}X\), so \(\operatorname{rank}(C_\psi )=\operatorname{rank}(X)\) because multiplication by a nonzero scalar preserves rank.
Let \(X\in M_{D,k}(\mathbb {C})(\mathbb {C})\) and let \(\eta \in \mathbb {C}^D\otimes \mathbb {C}^k\). Then \(R_X^\dagger \eta \in \mathbb {C}^D\otimes \mathbb {C}^D\) has Schmidt rank at most \(k\).
If \(\eta \) is read as a \(D\times k\) coefficient matrix \(E\), then the coefficient matrix of \(R_X^\dagger \eta \) is \(EX^\dagger \). Therefore \(\operatorname{rank}(EX^\dagger )\le \operatorname{rank}(X^\dagger )=\operatorname{rank}(X)\le k\).
If \(\psi \in \mathbb {C}^D\otimes \mathbb {C}^D\) has Schmidt rank at most \(k\), then there exist \(X\in M_{D,k}(\mathbb {C})(\mathbb {C})\) and \(\eta \in \mathbb {C}^D\otimes \mathbb {C}^k\) such that \(\psi =R_X^\dagger \eta \).
Let \(C_\psi \) be the coefficient matrix of \(\psi \). The rank assumption gives a factorization \(C_\psi =BC\) through \(\mathbb {C}^k\). Taking \(X=C^\dagger \) and reading \(B\) as the coefficient matrix of \(\eta \) gives the required identity, because the coefficient matrix of \(R_X^\dagger \eta \) is \(BX^\dagger =BC\).
For \(X\in M_{D,k}(\mathbb {C})(\mathbb {C})\) and \(\eta \in \mathbb {C}^D\otimes \mathbb {C}^k\),
Substituting (??) gives
Applying the \(k\)-fold ampliation of \(T\) to the rank-one matrix \(|\psi \rangle \! \langle \psi |\), where \(\psi _{(a,p)}=D^{-1/2}X_{a,p}\), is exactly the right-factor compression of the Choi matrix of \(T\) by \(X\).
In entries, both sides are
If \(\psi _{(a,p)}=D^{-1/2}X_{a,p}\), then for fixed \(p,q\), the corresponding block of \(|\psi \rangle \! \langle \psi |\) is
Hence
where the second equality uses \(\tau _{(i,a),(j,b)}=D^{-1}(T(E_{a,b}))_{i,j}\).
Let \(X\in M_{D,k}(\mathbb {C})(\mathbb {C})\) and \(P\in M_{D,D}(\mathbb {C})(\mathbb {C})\). Then the right-tensor factors satisfy \(R_XR_P=R_{PX}\).
This is an entrywise calculation: the Kronecker delta in the physical index forces the two right-tensor factors to have the same physical coordinate, and the remaining sum is the matrix product \(PX\).
Let \(T:M_{D,D}(\mathbb {C})(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D,D}(\mathbb {C})(\mathbb {C})\) have Choi matrix \(\tau \). Suppose \(P\in M_{D,D}(\mathbb {C})(\mathbb {C})\) and \(X\in M_{D,k}(\mathbb {C})(\mathbb {C})\) satisfy \(PX=X\). If \(R_P\tau R_P^\dagger \ge 0\), then the rectangular right compression of \(\tau \) by \(X\) is positive semidefinite.
Since \(PX=X\), Lemma I.4.10 gives \(R_XR_P=R_X\). Therefore
which is positive because positive semidefiniteness is preserved under compression. The left-hand side of (??) is the rectangular compression by (??).
Let \(X\in M_{D,k}(\mathbb {C})(\mathbb {C})\) and suppose \(k\le D\). Then there exists a Hermitian projection \(P\in M_{D,D}(\mathbb {C})(\mathbb {C})\) of rank \(k\) such that \(PX=X\).
The column space of \(X\) has dimension at most \(k\). Since \(k\le D\), extend this column space to a \(k\)-dimensional subspace \(U\subseteq \mathbb {C}^D\). Let \(P\) be the orthogonal projection onto \(U\). Then \(P\) is Hermitian and idempotent, its rank is \(\dim U=k\), and it fixes each column of \(X\).
For every \(V\in M_{D,k}(\mathbb {C})(\mathbb {C})\), the right-tensor factor satisfies \(R_{VV^\dagger }=R_V^\dagger R_V\).
This is the entrywise calculation obtained by expanding the definition of \(R_V\) and summing over the middle physical index.
Let \(T:M_{D,D}(\mathbb {C})(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D,D}(\mathbb {C})(\mathbb {C})\) have Choi matrix \(\tau \). For every \(V\in M_{D,k}(\mathbb {C})(\mathbb {C})\),
Replace \(R_{VV^\dagger }\) by \(R_V^\dagger R_V\) using Lemma I.4.13 and reassociate the matrix products.
Assume \(D{\gt}0\). Let \(T:M_{D,D}(\mathbb {C})(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D,D}(\mathbb {C})(\mathbb {C})\) be \(k\)-positive, with Choi matrix \(\tau \). If a right-factor matrix has the form \(P=VV^\dagger \) with \(V\in M_{D,k}(\mathbb {C})(\mathbb {C})\), then \(R_P\tau R_P^\dagger \geq 0\).
By (??), \(R_{VV^\dagger }\tau R_{VV^\dagger }^\dagger =R_V^\dagger (R_V\tau R_V^\dagger )R_V\). The factor \(R_V\tau R_V^\dagger \) is positive by Theorem 22.2.3.7, and positive semidefiniteness is preserved under compression by \(R_V\).
Let \(P\in M_{D,D}(\mathbb {C})(\mathbb {C})\) be Hermitian, idempotent, and of rank \(k\). Then there exists \(V\in M_{D,k}(\mathbb {C})(\mathbb {C})\) such that \(P=VV^\dagger \).
Regard \(P\) as a linear operator on \(\mathbb {C}^D\). Hermiticity and idempotence say that this operator is the orthogonal projection onto its range. Choose an orthonormal basis of the range, indexed by \(\{ 0,\ldots ,k-1\} \) using the rank hypothesis, and let \(V\) be the matrix whose columns are these basis vectors. The standard rank-one expansion of an orthogonal projection gives \(P=VV^\dagger \).
These identities provide the bounded-Schmidt-rank representatives used in Theorems 22.2.3.3 and 22.2.3.4, identify ampliations with Choi compressions in Theorem 22.2.3.6, and supply the projection factorizations in Theorem 22.2.3.10.
I.5 Closure properties of \(k\)-positive maps
The next results record the monotonicity and elementary convex-cone properties used with the positivity hierarchy in Chapter 22.
Positivity under amplification is monotone in \(k\).
Embed \(M_{k}(\mathbb {C})\) as the upper-left corner of \(M_{k+1}(\mathbb {C})\). For \(X\succeq 0\) in \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\otimes M_{k}(\mathbb {C})\), extend \(X\) by a zero row and column, apply the positive \((k+1)\)-fold ampliation, and compress back to the same corner. Compression preserves positive semidefiniteness, and the compressed image is the \(k\)-fold ampliation of \(X\).
If a linear map is \(k\)-positive and \(m \le k\), then it is \(m\)-positive.
Repeat the corner-extension and compression argument from dimension \(k\) to dimension \(m\). Equivalently, iterate the preceding theorem \(k-m\) times.
The zero map is \(k\)-positive.
Every ampliation of the zero map is zero, and the zero matrix is positive semidefinite.
If \(E\) and \(F\) are \(k\)-positive, then \(E+F\) is \(k\)-positive.
For \(X\succeq 0\), both \(E^{(k)}(X)\) and \(F^{(k)}(X)\) are positive semidefinite. Since \((E+F)^{(k)}=E^{(k)}+F^{(k)}\), their sum is positive semidefinite.
If \(E\) is \(k\)-positive and \(c \ge 0\), then \(cE\) is \(k\)-positive.
Ampliation commutes with scalar multiplication, and a non-negative scalar multiple of a positive semidefinite matrix is positive semidefinite.
For each \(k\), the set of \(k\)-positive linear maps is closed in the finite-dimensional space of linear maps.
Let \(E_j\to E\) with every \(E_j\) \(k\)-positive. For each fixed \(X\succeq 0\), continuity of ampliation and evaluation gives \(E_j^{(k)}(X)\to E^{(k)}(X)\). The positive semidefinite cone is closed, so \(E^{(k)}(X)\succeq 0\). Since this holds for every positive semidefinite \(X\), the limit map \(E\) is \(k\)-positive.