- Boxes
- definitions
- Ellipses
- theorems and lemmas
- Blue border
- the statement of this result is ready to be formalized; all prerequisites are done
- Orange border
- the statement of this result is not ready to be formalized; the blueprint needs more work
- Blue background
- the proof of this result is ready to be formalized; all prerequisites are done
- Green border
- the statement of this result is formalized
- Green background
- the proof of this result is formalized
- Dark green background
- the proof of this result and all its ancestors are formalized
- Dark green border
- this is in Mathlib
Let \(K=(K_i)_{i=0}^{d-1}\) be a unital Kraus family, that is, \(\sum _i K_i K_i^\dagger =\mathbb {1}\). Then for all \(X\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), \(\mathcal{K}(X^\dagger X)\ge \mathcal{K}(X)^\dagger \mathcal{K}(X)\), where \(\mathcal{K}(Y)=\sum _i K_i Y K_i^\dagger \).
Let \(T_1,T_2:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be CP maps with \(T_1\le T_2\). Then there exist ancilla dimensions \(r_1,m\), Heisenberg-form Stinespring matrices \(V_1:\mathbb {C}^D\to \mathbb {C}^D\otimes \mathbb {C}^{r_1}\) and \(V_2:\mathbb {C}^D\to \mathbb {C}^D\otimes \mathbb {C}^m\) realizing \(T_1,T_2\) via \(T_i(A)=V_i^\dagger (A\otimes \mathbb {1})V_i\), and a rectangular contraction \(\widetilde C:\mathbb {C}^m\to \mathbb {C}^{r_1}\) with \(\widetilde C^\dagger \widetilde C\le \mathbb {1}_m\) such that
This is the explicit square corollary obtained by constructing both dilation matrices, rather than the supplied-dilation statement of Theorem 3.11.7.
Let \(I\) be a nonempty finite set, and let \(T_i,T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be completely positive linear maps such that \(\sum _{i\in I}T_i=T\). If \(V:\mathbb {C}^D\to \mathbb {C}^D\otimes \mathbb {C}^r\) satisfies \(T(A)=V^\dagger (A\otimes \mathbb {1}_r)V\), then there are positive semidefinite operators \(P_i\in M_{r}(\mathbb {C})\) satisfying \(\sum _{i\in I}P_i=\mathbb {1}_r\) and \(T_i(A)=V^\dagger (A\otimes P_i)V\) for every \(i\in I\) and \(A\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\).
For finitely many complex numbers \(\theta _j\) satisfying \(|\theta _j|=1\), there is a strictly increasing sequence of positive integers \(n_i\) such that \(\theta _j^{n_i}\longrightarrow 1\) simultaneously for every \(j\).
Let \(H,V\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) with \(H\) Hermitian, \(V\) unitary, \(HV^{\dagger }=V^{\dagger }H^{T}\), and \(V^{T}=-V\). Then every eigenvalue of \(H\) is at least two-fold degenerate.
For \(s\in [0,1]\), \(t\in [0,1]\), and positive-definite matrices \(A_1,A_2,B_1,B_2\), the map \((A,B)\mapsto \Re \operatorname{tr}(A^s B^{1-s})\) is jointly concave:
Obtained from Theorem 7.7.13 by taking \(K=\mathbb {1}\).
For \(s\in [0,1]\), \(t\in [0,1]\), matrix \(K\), and positive-definite matrices \(A_1,A_2,B\), the map \(A\mapsto \Re \operatorname{tr}(K^\dagger A^s K B^{1-s})\) is concave:
For \(s\in [0,1]\), \(t\in [0,1]\), matrix \(K\), and positive-definite matrices \(A,B_1,B_2\), the map \(B\mapsto \Re \operatorname{tr}(K^\dagger A^s K B^{1-s})\) is concave:
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be completely positive with bounded orbits. Then the mean-ergodic projection \(T_\infty \) of [ Wol12 , Equation (6.14) ] is completely positive. If \(T\) is completely positive and trace-preserving, the bounded orbits are automatic and \(T_\infty \) is completely positive and trace-preserving, hence a quantum channel. Together with Corollary 8.1.14 this completes the preservation assertion of [ Wol12 , Proposition 6.3 ] for all three maps \(T_\infty \), \(T_\phi \), and \(T_\varphi \).
Let \(\{ \Phi _i\} \) be a quantum instrument on \(M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\) with \(d\geq 1\) whose total channel is the identity. Then for every outcome \(i\) the probability \(p_i(\rho )\) is a non-negative constant, the same for every \(\rho \) of unit trace.
The peripheral projection of a positive trace-preserving map is positive and trace-preserving, and then the phase-weighted map \(T_\varphi \) is positive and trace-preserving as well. If the original map is completely positive, then \(T_\phi \) and \(T_\varphi \) are quantum channels. This is the preservation assertion in the opening clause of [ Wol12 , Proposition 6.3 ] (item (ii) itself states only the composition identity).
- IsPositiveMap.peripheralProjection_isPositiveMap
- IsPositiveMap.peripheralProjection_isTracePreservingMap
- IsPositiveMap.peripheralWeightedProjection_isPositiveMap
- IsPositiveMap.peripheralWeightedProjection_isTracePreservingMap
- IsPositiveMap.peripheralProjection_isCPMap
- IsChannel.peripheralProjection
- IsChannel.peripheralWeightedProjection
Let \(1\le k\) with \(k+1{\lt}D\). Then there is a map on \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) that is \(k\)-positive but not \((k+1)\)-positive; the cone of \(k\)-positive maps strictly contains the cone of \((k+1)\)-positive maps. Every inclusion between consecutive amplification dimensions below the top one is therefore strict.
Let \(E\colon M_D(\mathbb C)\to M_D(\mathbb C)\) be a positive, trace-preserving linear map. Let \(\mathcal F_E=\{ X\mid E(X)=X\} \) be the fixed-point subspace and \(r = \dim _{\mathbb C} \mathcal F_E\). Then there exist \(r\) linearly independent stationary density matrices \(\rho _1,\dots ,\rho _r\) (positive semidefinite, trace 1, fixed by \(E\)) whose \(\mathbb C\)-linear span equals \(\mathcal F_E\).
This is Wolf Corollary 6.5 (Linearly independent stationary states).
- IsPositiveMap.fixedPointsSubmodule
- IsPositiveMap.span_posSemidefFixedPointsSet_eq_fixedPointsSubmodule
- IsPositiveMap.fixedPointsSubmodule_spanned_by_stationaryDensities
- IsPositiveMap.exists_stationaryDensity_basis_of_fixedPointsSubmodule
- IsStationaryDensity
- IsPositiveMap.stationaryDensity_of_posSemidef_fixedPoint
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D'}(\mathbb {C})\) be a trace-preserving positive linear map. Then for all density matrices \(\rho _1,\rho _2\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), \(\lVert T(\rho _1)-T(\rho _2)\rVert _{\operatorname{tr}} \leq \lVert \rho _1-\rho _2\rVert _{\operatorname{tr}}\). See [ Wol12 , Chapter 8, Eq. (8.80) ] .
Let \(T\) be a complex endomorphism on the same \(D\)-dimensional coordinate space as \(\Lambda ,N\in M_D(\mathbb C)\), and take \(\mu =\mu (T)\) from Definition 10.3. If \(\Lambda \) is diagonal, \(N\) is strictly upper triangular, and \(\lVert \Lambda \rVert _\infty =\mu \), then the coarse and refined estimates of Theorem 10.10 hold with this shared source-shaped \(\mu \).
For a complex-linear map \(E:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), set
These are [ Wol12 , Equations (5.11)–(5.12) ] , with the source’s convention that the subscript records the side on which \(A\) multiplies the varying matrix.
A complex-linear map \(E:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) satisfies the Schwarz inequality if, for every \(A\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\),
This is [ Wol12 , Equation (5.2) ] .
For a bipartite density operator \(\rho \in M_{d_A}(\mathbb {C})\otimes M_{d_B}(\mathbb {C})\), its operator-Schmidt rank is the least integer \(r\) for which there are matrices \(A_t\in M_{d_A}(\mathbb {C})\) and \(B_t\in M_{d_B}(\mathbb {C})\) satisfying
No Hermiticity or positivity condition is imposed on the factors. This is the definition in [ DlCDN19 , Equation (1) ] ; the same formula defines the rank of an arbitrary complex bipartite matrix.
For \(r,s\), let \(P_{\mathrm{top}}=C_{r,s}^\dagger C_{r,s}\) and \(P_{\mathrm{bot}}=\mathbb {1}-P_{\mathrm{top}}\). Both are PSD (for \(P_{\mathrm{bot}}\), by Lemma 3.11.10) and \(P_{\mathrm{top}}+P_{\mathrm{bot}}=\mathbb {1}\).
For natural numbers \(r,s\), let \(C=C_{r,s}\in \mathbb {C}^{r\times (r+s)}\) be the rectangular \(r\times (r+s)\) matrix whose rows are the first \(r\) rows of the identity on \(\mathbb {C}^{r+s}\): \(C_{ij}=1\) if \(j=i{\lt}r\) and \(0\) otherwise.
For a linear map \(E : M_{D_{\rm in}}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D_{\rm out}}(\mathbb {C})\), its \(k\)-fold ampliation acts between the corresponding block-matrix algebras by
For a linear map \(T : M_{D}(\mathbb {C}) \to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), the channel determinant \(\det T\) is the determinant of the matrix of \(T\) with respect to the standard matrix-unit basis of \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\). This is the quantity studied in [ Wol12 , Section 6.1 ] .
The Choi matrix of a linear map \(T : M_{D}(\mathbb {C}) \to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) is
Concretely, \(\tau _{(i_1,i_2),(j_1,j_2)} = \frac{1}{D}\, (T(E_{i_2 j_2}))_{i_1 j_1}\) where \(E_{i_2 j_2}\) is the matrix unit. This is the Choi–Jamiol\- kowski convention of [ Wol12 , Proposition 2.1 ] .
The Choi matrix of a linear map \(T:M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{d'}(\mathbb {C})\) is
an operator on \(\mathbb {C}^{d'}\otimes \mathbb {C}^{d}\). This is the correspondence of [ Wol12 , Proposition 2.1 ] .
For a linear map \(T : M_{D}(\mathbb {C}) \to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) with Choi–Jamiołkowski operator \(\tau \), the purity of \(\tau \) is \(\operatorname{tr}[\tau ^\dagger \tau ]\), the sum
of the squared moduli of the entries of \(\tau \); in particular it is non-negative.
Let \(T:M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{d'}(\mathbb {C})\) have Choi matrix \(\tau \) on \(\mathbb {C}^{d'}\otimes \mathbb {C}^d\). For \(X\in M_{d\times k}(\mathbb {C})\), the right-factor compression is the matrix on \(\mathbb {C}^{d'}\otimes \mathbb {C}^k\) with entries
The associated vector on \(\mathbb {C}^d\otimes \mathbb {C}^k\) has coefficients \(d^{-1/2}X_{a,p}\).
For \(X\in M_{d\times k}(\mathbb {C})\), let \(R_X\) be the matrix from \(\mathbb {C}^{d'}\otimes \mathbb {C}^d\) to \(\mathbb {C}^{d'}\otimes \mathbb {C}^k\) with entries
On the cyclic index set \(\mathbb {Z}/d\mathbb {Z}\), the Choi-type map is
where \(D\) keeps the diagonal of a matrix and \(U_{k0}\) is the cyclic shift by \(k\).
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be linear. For \(X\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) set
where the suprema and infima in (28) are taken in \(\overline{\mathbb {R}}\). These are [ Wol12 , Equations (6.29)–(6.30) ] . The corrected global quantities are
The trace-one condition is Wolf’s homogeneous normalization from local source lines 634–637. A pair \((X,a)\) is lower feasible when \(X\geq 0\), \(\operatorname{tr}X=1\), and \(a\in L_T(X)\); it is upper feasible when the first two conditions hold and \(a\in U_T(X)\).
A linear map \(T:M_D(\mathbb {C})\to M_D(\mathbb {C})\) has commutative range if \(T(X)\) and \(T(Y)\) commute for all \(X,Y\in M_D(\mathbb {C})\). Since a family of pairwise-commuting elements generates a commutative subalgebra, this is the statement that \(T\) maps into a commutative subalgebra of \(M_D(\mathbb {C})\).
The commutator form of the Lindblad equation writes the generator as
where \([A,B] = AB - BA\). This is [ Wol12 , Equation (7.22) ] .
Let \(V\) and \(V'\) be finite-dimensional real Hilbert spaces, let \(K\subseteq V\) be a closed pointed convex cone with nonempty interior, let \(T:V\to V'\) be linear, and fix \(c\in V\) and \(b\in V'\). As in [ Wol12 , Chapter 4, equations (4.1)–(4.2) ] , define the dual cone, the primal and dual feasible sets, and their values by
The values belong to the extended real line. The conventions are \(\inf \varnothing =+\infty \) and \(\sup \varnothing =-\infty \); an objective unbounded below has infimum \(-\infty \), and one unbounded above has supremum \(+\infty \). The nonempty-interior assumption is Wolf’s convention for a conic program; the definitions and weak duality do not require it.
Following [ Wol12 , Chapter 4, lines 72–78 ] , the primal problem is strictly feasible when there is an \(x\in \operatorname {int}K\) with \(T(x)=b\). The dual problem is strictly feasible when there is a \(y\in V'\) such that \(c-T^*(y)\in \operatorname {int}K^*\). A primal optimizer is an \(x^0\in \mathcal F_p\) satisfying \(\langle c|x^0\rangle \leq \langle c|x\rangle \) for every \(x\in \mathcal F_p\); a dual optimizer is a \(y^0\in \mathcal F_d\) satisfying \(\langle b|y\rangle \leq \langle b|y^0\rangle \) for every \(y\in \mathcal F_d\).
Let
The controlled dependent partial trace discards the off-diagonal blocks between distinct \(i\) and applies \(\operatorname{tr}_{B_i}\) to the \(i\)th diagonal block.
A convex decomposition of a density operator \(\rho \in M_{d_A}(\mathbb {C})\) is a finite family of nonnegative weights \(\lambda _i\) summing to one together with density operators \(\rho _i\in M_{d_A}(\mathbb {C})\) satisfying \(\rho =\sum _i\lambda _i\rho _i\).
For density operators \(\rho ,\rho _1\) on the same space and \(c\in \mathbb {R}\), \(\rho \) has a convex decomposition with \(\rho _1\) carrying weight \(c\) when \(\rho =\sum _i\lambda _i\rho _i\) for some finite index set, with every \(\rho _i\) a density operator, every \(\lambda _i\ge 0\), \(\sum _i\lambda _i=1\), and some index \(i_1\) with \(\lambda _{i_1}=c\), \(\rho _{i_1}=\rho _1\).
For an idempotent \(P\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), the subspace \(\{ X\mid PXP=X\} \) and the corner \(\{ PXP\mid X\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\} \) are identified as \(\mathbb {C}\)-linear spaces by the identity on underlying matrices.
For linear maps \(S,T:M_{d_{\rm in}}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{d_{\rm out}}(\mathbb {C})\), write \(T\le S\) (in the CP order) when \(S-T\) is completely positive.
A linear map \(E : M_{D}(\mathbb {C}) \to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) is completely positive (CP) if it admits a Kraus representation: there exist operators \(\{ K_i\} _{i=0}^{r-1}\) with \(K_i \in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) such that, for every \(X \in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\),
The Kraus representation also gives entrywise positivity on every positive block matrix by Theorem 2.2.1, and hence the associated completely positive map between matrix \(C^*\)-algebras in Theorem 2.2.2.
A linear map \(T:\bigoplus _{k{\lt}r}M_{d_k}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{p}(\mathbb {C})\) is completely positive if, for every natural number \(j\) and every family \(X=(X_k)_{k{\lt}r}\) with \(X_k\in M_{d_k}(\mathbb {C})\otimes M_{j}(\mathbb {C})\), entrywise positivity implies
where the \((a,b)\) slice of \((T\otimes \operatorname{id}_j)(X)\) is \(T\) applied to the family of \((a,b)\) slices of the matrices \(X_k\). This is the direct-sum analogue of rectangular Kraus complete positivity (Definition 2.5.2).
Let \(S\subseteq M_{m}(\mathbb {C})\) be a subspace and \(T:S\to M_{n}(\mathbb {C})\) a linear map. For a natural number \(k\), write \(T\otimes \mathrm{id}_k\) for the map sending a \(k\times k\) block matrix with entries in \(S\) to the block matrix obtained by applying \(T\) to every entry. Then \(T\) is completely positive on \(S\) if \(T\otimes \mathrm{id}_k\) sends every positive semidefinite such block matrix to a positive semidefinite matrix, for every \(k\) (the condition is vacuous at \(k=0\)). This makes no reference to \(S\) being an operator system; it is applied below to an operator system \(S\) because that is the situation in which the extension theorem holds.
Let \(S\subseteq \bigoplus _{k{\lt}r}M_{d_k}(\mathbb {C})\) be a subspace and \(T:S\to M_{p}(\mathbb {C})\) a linear map. The level-\(j\) ampliation of \(T\) is defined by bipartite slicing: for a family \(X=(X_k)_{k{\lt}r}\) with \(X_k\in M_{d_k}(\mathbb {C})\otimes M_{j}(\mathbb {C})\) whose slice families lie in \(S\),
and \(T\) is completely positive on \(S\) if entrywise positivity \((\forall k{\lt}r,\ X_k\ge 0)\) always implies \((T\otimes \operatorname{id}_j)(X)\ge 0\), for every \(j\). This is Definition 1.6.10 applied block by block, one summand at a time.
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\). A block-permutation structure for \(T\) consists of a finite index set \(\iota \), a family of orthogonal projections \(P_k\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) for \(k\in \iota \), and a permutation \(\sigma \in \mathrm{Sym}(\iota )\), not necessarily a single cycle, such that, for every \(k\in \iota \) and \(X\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\),
In general, \(\sigma \) may have multiple disjoint cycles.
A map \(\Phi \colon M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{d'}(\mathbb {C})\) is completely copositive if \(\Phi \circ \theta \) is completely positive, where \(\theta \) is transposition. It is decomposable if \(\Phi =\Phi _{\mathrm{cp}}+\Phi _{\mathrm{ccp}}\) with \(\Phi _{\mathrm{cp}}\) completely positive and \(\Phi _{\mathrm{ccp}}\) completely copositive. It is indecomposable if it is positive and not decomposable.
A witness \(W\) on \(\mathbb {C}^d\otimes \mathbb {C}^{d'}\) is decomposable when
This is the explicit cone in Wolf’s Equation (3.15), with partial transposition on the first factor.
The set of density matrices in \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) is
In the existing matrix-family coordinates for \(\mathcal A=\bigoplus _{k\in I}M_{d_k}(\mathbb {C})\), its density states are the families \(A=(A_k)_{k\in I}\) such that every \(A_k\succeq 0\) and \(\sum _k\operatorname{tr}(A_k)=1\).
Let
and let \(\mathcal H_A=\bigoplus _{k\in I}\mathbb {C}^{n_k}\) and \(\mathcal H_B=\bigoplus _{l\in J}\mathbb {C}^{m_l}\). Write \(\iota _A,\iota _B\) for the block-diagonal embeddings and \(\pi _A,\pi _B\) for diagonal-block compression. For a linear map \(T:\mathcal A\to \mathcal B\), its canonical full-matrix extension is
For \(X\in \mathcal A\) and \(Y\in \mathcal B\), the trace adjoint \(T^*:\mathcal B\to \mathcal A\) is defined by
This is the block-diagonal realization needed for the fixed-point and classification arguments in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.4, lines 1980–2003 ] . It is only an auxiliary construction: it does not assert the classification conclusion of that passage.
A linear map \(T : M_{D}(\mathbb {C}) \to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) is doubly-stochastic if \(T(\mathbb {1})\propto \mathbb {1}\) and the reduced density matrix \(\operatorname{tr}_{1}[\tau ]\) of its Choi matrix \(\tau =(T\otimes \operatorname{id})(|\Omega \rangle \! \langle \Omega |)\) is proportional to the identity. This is the normal form in [ Wol12 , Proposition 2.9 ] .
A linear map \(T : M_{d_1}(\mathbb {C}) \to M_{d_2}(\mathbb {C})\) between matrix algebras of possibly different dimensions is doubly-stochastic if \(T(\mathbb {1})\propto \mathbb {1}\) and \(T^{*}(\mathbb {1})\propto \mathbb {1}\), where \(T^{*}\) is the trace-pairing adjoint. This is the normal-form condition of [ Wol12 , Proposition 2.9 ] ; by the rectangular Choi–Jamiolkowski correspondence it is equivalent to both partial traces of the Choi matrix being proportional to the identity.
A family of linear maps \(T : \mathbb {R}\to (M_{D}(\mathbb {C}) \to _{\ell } M_{D}(\mathbb {C}))\) is a dynamical semigroup if
(semigroup law) \(T_{t+s} = T_t \circ T_s\) for all \(t,s \ge 0\); and
(initial condition) \(T_0 = \operatorname{id}\).
This is [ Wol12 , Equation (7.1) ] .
Let \(d_A{\gt}0\) and let \(\rho _{BC}\) be positive semidefinite. Define
Under the canonical reassociation from \(A\times (B\times C)\) to \((A\times B)\times C\), the right partial trace removes \(C\).
Let \(\rho _A\) and \(\rho _{BC}\) be positive semidefinite, and define
We use the canonical reassociation from \(A\times (B\times C)\) to \((A\times B)\times C\), so that the right partial trace removes \(C\).
If \(P_A\) is the support projection of \(\rho _A\), define
For a fixed \(B\), the set \(\mathcal{A}_B\subseteq M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) of \(A\)’s for which equality is attained in the two-variable operator Schwarz inequality:
Given a generator \(L \in \operatorname{End}_{\mathbb {C}}(M_{D}(\mathbb {C}))\), the exponential semigroup is
For \(t{\gt}0\), set \(h(t)=-t\log t\), and set \(h(0)=0\). The entropy of a probability distribution \(a=(a_z)_{z\in Z}\) on a finite set is \(H(a)=\sum _{z\in Z}h(a_z)\). For a joint probability distribution \(P\) with row and column marginals \(p\) and \(q\), put
Let \(X\) and \(Y\) be finite sets. A matrix \(P=(P_{x,y})_{x\in X,y\in Y}\) is a joint probability distribution if \(P_{x,y}\geq 0\) for every \(x\in X\) and \(y\in Y\), and
Its row and column marginals are respectively
A Fitting decomposition of a linear endomorphism \(f:V\to V\) on a finite-dimensional vector space over an algebraically closed field consists of:
\(f\) is nilpotent on the generalized \(0\)-eigenspace,
\(f\) is invertible on each generalized \(\mu \)-eigenspace for \(\mu \neq 0\),
the generalized eigenspaces span \(V\),
the generalized eigenspaces are linearly independent.
Given a linear map \(E:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) and a fixed point \(\rho \) with \(E(\rho )=\rho \) and \(\operatorname{tr}(\rho )\neq 0\), the fixed-point projection is the rank-one map
This projects onto the span of \(\rho \) along the kernel of the trace functional. When the fixed point is unique up to scaling, this span is the full fixed-point space.
The flip operator \(F\) on \(\mathbb {C}^d \otimes \mathbb {C}^d\) is
Its matrix entries are
Let
A real matrix \(C\in M_4(\mathbb R)\) is \(M\)-selfadjoint when \(C^{\mathsf T}M=MC\).
For a complex-linear map \(E:\mathbb C^{I\times I}\to \mathbb C^{J\times J}\), define its Frobenius transport by
For finite index sets \(I\) and \(J\), define
This is a complex-linear isometric equivalence when the matrix space is equipped with the Frobenius norm.
A generator decomposition consists of a completely positive map \(\phi : M_{d}(\mathbb {C}) \to M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\) and a matrix \(\kappa \in M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\), defining the linear map
This is [ Wol12 , Equation (7.14) ] .
Following Ha’s displayed decomposition [ Ha98 , pp. 594–595 ] , continue to use zero-based cyclic indices, and let \(\mathcal B_d\) be the set of pairs
This is the zero-based form of Ha’s two displayed ranges for the vectors \(\beta _{1j}\) and \(\beta _{ij}\); it is empty when \(d=3\). Define
and let
Let \(\sigma (x\otimes y)=y\otimes x\), and write \(A^\sigma \) for the corresponding exchange of both tensor factors of a bipartite matrix. This exchange is an involution. If \(A=\sum _{i,j}a_{ij}\otimes e_{ij}\) and \(\Phi :M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\) is linear, define the Eom–Kye bilinear pairing by
For \(J_d=\sum _{i,j}e_{ij}\otimes e_{ij}\), its associated matrix pairing is \(\langle X,J_d\rangle =\sum _{i,j}X_{(i,i),(j,j)}\).
The Choi-type map may be transported from the cyclic basis \(\mathbb {Z}/d\mathbb {Z}\) to the standard basis indexed by \(0,\ldots ,d-1\), and \(A_\gamma \) may be transported in the opposite direction on both tensor factors. These simultaneous changes of basis identify the two forms of the pairing in Theorem 4.8.1.36; they do not add a positivity hypothesis.
Fix \(d\ge 3\) and \(\gamma {\gt}0\). Following Ha’s proof of [ Ha98 , Theorem 2.1 ] , put \(m_k=\frac32(3^k-1)\) for \(0\le k{\lt}d\), choose \(\zeta =\exp (2\pi i/3^d)\), and enumerate the \(3^d\)-th roots of unity by \(\omega _i=\zeta ^i\) for \(0\le i{\lt}3^d\). Define
If \(S e_p=e_{p+1}\) with cyclic indices, set
With \(\circ \) denoting coordinatewise multiplication, let
- Matrix.haExponent
- Matrix.haPrimitiveRoot
- Matrix.haRootOfUnity
- Matrix.haPrimitiveRoot_isPrimitive
- Matrix.haRootOfUnity_pow_card
- Matrix.haPhaseVector
- Matrix.haPhaseVector_eq_smul_zero
- Matrix.haBaseWeight
- Matrix.haCyclicWeight
- Matrix.haModifiedPhaseVector
- Matrix.haTwoSimpleWeight
- Matrix.haTwoSimpleVector
- Matrix.haArGamma
- Matrix.haAGamma
Condition (4): there exists a nontrivial projector \(P\) and a Lindblad form \((H,\{ L_j\} )\) for \(L\) such that \((\mathbb {1}-P)L_jP=0\) and \((\mathbb {1}-P)\kappa P=0\) for all \(j\), where \(\kappa =iH+\frac{1}{2}\sum _jL_j^\dagger L_j\).
Let \(\mathbb K\) denote either \(\mathbb {R}\) or \(\mathbb {C}\), and let \(V\) be a normed vector space over \(\mathbb K\). A linear endomorphism \(f:V\to V\) has bounded orbits if, for every \(x\in V\), the set \(\{ f^n x:n\in \mathbb {N}\} \) is bounded.
A bipartite matrix \(\rho \) on \(M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\otimes M_{d'}(\mathbb {C})\) has Schmidt number at most \(n\) when it is a finite sum of pure-state projectors of Schmidt rank at most \(n\),
A complex-linear map \(E:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) and a fixed \(B\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) satisfy the per-\(B\) Schwarz hypothesis when
for every \(A\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\). A \(2\)-positive map satisfies this for every \(B\) (Theorem 6.9.2.5).
A completely positive map \(E\) on \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) has the restricted CP spectral properties used here if there exist a positive real number \(r\), a positive definite right eigenvector \(\rho \), and a positive definite left eigenvector \(\sigma \) for the adjoint map such that
every positive semidefinite right eigenvector for eigenvalue \(r\) is a scalar multiple of \(\rho \), and the spectral radius of \(E\) is equal to \(r\). The uniqueness clause concerns only positive semidefinite Perron eigenvectors. Unlike the full nondegenerate-eigenspace statement in [ Wol12 , Theorem 6.4 ] , it does not assert that every complex eigenvector at \(r\) is proportional to \(\rho \).
A Hayashi Markov decomposition of a tripartite state \(\rho _{ABC}\) consists of a finite direct-sum decomposition
together with a unitary change of basis on \(B\), a probability vector \((p_j)_j\), and density matrices \(\rho _{A B_j^L}\) and \(\rho _{B_j^R C}\) such that, in the adapted basis, the state becomes
The terminology follows Hayashi’s presentation of quantum Markov structure [ Hay06 ] ; the block decomposition used by the MPDO argument is the structure theorem of [ HJPW04 ] .
The Hermitian \(n\times n\) matrices form a finite-dimensional real Hilbert space for Wolf’s trace pairing \(\langle A|B\rangle =\operatorname {Re}\operatorname{tr}(AB)\). Its positive-semidefinite matrices form a closed proper cone \(K_{\mathrm{psd}}\) satisfying \(K_{\mathrm{psd}}^*=K_{\mathrm{psd}}\), and \(\operatorname {int}K_{\mathrm{psd}}=\{ A:A{\gt}0\} \). The last identity also covers the zero-dimensional matrix space, where positive definiteness is vacuous and the cone is the whole space.
- SemidefiniteProgram.matrixRealLinearEquiv
- SemidefiniteProgram.hermitianSubmodule
- SemidefiniteProgram.HermitianMatrix
- SemidefiniteProgram.HermitianMatrix.toMatrix
- SemidefiniteProgram.HermitianMatrix.toMatrix_isHermitian
- SemidefiniteProgram.HermitianMatrix.ofMatrix
- SemidefiniteProgram.HermitianMatrix.toMatrix_ofMatrix
- SemidefiniteProgram.HermitianMatrix.toMatrix_zero
- SemidefiniteProgram.HermitianMatrix.toMatrix_add
- SemidefiniteProgram.HermitianMatrix.toMatrix_sub
- SemidefiniteProgram.HermitianMatrix.toMatrix_smul
- SemidefiniteProgram.HermitianMatrix.inner_eq_re_trace_mul
- SemidefiniteProgram.HermitianMatrix.trace_mul_eq_ofReal_inner
- SemidefiniteProgram.HermitianMatrix.psdCone
- SemidefiniteProgram.HermitianMatrix.mem_psdCone_iff
- SemidefiniteProgram.HermitianMatrix.mem_innerDual_psdCone_iff
- SemidefiniteProgram.HermitianMatrix.innerDual_psdCone
- SemidefiniteProgram.HermitianMatrix.posDef_iff_forall_inner_pos
- SemidefiniteProgram.HermitianMatrix.interior_psdCone_eq_posDef
- SemidefiniteProgram.HermitianMatrix.mem_interior_psdCone_iff_posDef
Let \(A=U\operatorname {diag}(\lambda _0,\ldots ,\lambda _{d-1})U^\dagger \) be Hermitian with \(\lambda _0\ge \cdots \ge \lambda _{d-1}\). For \(\varepsilon \in \mathbb {R}\), define
Define the corresponding Hermitian matrix by
Let \(A\) be Hermitian, with spectral decomposition \(A=U\operatorname{diag}(\lambda _i)U^\dagger \). Its support projection is
A family \((\sigma _\alpha )\) in \(M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\) is Hilbert–Schmidt orthonormal when
This is the pairing \(\operatorname{tr}(PA^\dagger B)\) of [ Wol12 , Equation (2.18) ] in the case \(P=\mathbb {1}\).
For a finite-dimensional system \(A\), there is a finite family of effects \((M_s)_s\), with \(0\leq M_s\leq \mathbf1_A\), whose complex linear span is the full matrix algebra on \(A\). One member is the identity. For an operator \(X\) on \(A\otimes B\), define its conditional slice by
The family may be chosen from the four rank-one effects occurring in the polarization identity, scaled so that every member is bounded by the identity.
For a linear map \(\Psi _B\) and a bipartite matrix \(\rho _{AB}\), define
where \(\Sigma \) denotes the canonical exchange of the two tensor factors.
Associated to an instrument are the total channel \(\sum _i\Phi _i\), the unnormalized update \(\rho \mapsto \Phi _i(\rho )\) for each outcome \(i\), the outcome probability \(p_i(\rho )=\operatorname{tr}(\Phi _i(\rho ))\), and the normalized posterior state \(\Phi _i(\rho )/p_i(\rho )\) whenever \(p_i(\rho )\neq 0\).
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be a bijective complex-linear map. Write \(T^{-1}\) for the inverse linear map supplied by the associated linear equivalence; it is both a left and a right inverse of \(T\).
An invertible filtering operation on \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) is a completely positive map
If \(T:M_{d_1}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{d_2}(\mathbb {C})\), pre- and postfiltering are written in Wolf’s order as \(\Phi _2\circ T\circ \Phi _1\). The matrices \(X\) are retained as part of the data; in particular, matrices which differ by a phase are not identified.
- Wolf.InvertibleFilter
- Wolf.InvertibleFilter.map
- Wolf.InvertibleFilter.map_apply
- Wolf.InvertibleFilter.map_eq_unitaryConjLM
- Wolf.InvertibleFilter.cp
- Wolf.InvertibleFilter.id
- Wolf.InvertibleFilter.map_id
- Wolf.InvertibleFilter.comp
- Wolf.InvertibleFilter.comp_X
- Wolf.InvertibleFilter.map_comp
- Wolf.InvertibleFilter.inv
- Wolf.InvertibleFilter.inv_X
- Wolf.InvertibleFilter.inv_comp
- Wolf.InvertibleFilter.comp_inv
- Wolf.InvertibleFilter.inv_map_comp
- Wolf.InvertibleFilter.map_comp_inv
- Wolf.InvertibleFilter.filteredMap
- Wolf.InvertibleFilter.filteredMap_apply
- Wolf.SLFiltering.toInvertibleFilter
- Wolf.SLFiltering.toInvertibleFilter_X
- Wolf.SLFiltering.toInvertibleFilter_map
Let \(I\) be a finite index set and let \(C\in \mathbb C^{I\times I}\) be invertible. Congruence by \(C\) is the complex-linear equivalence
whose inverse is
A linear map \(E : M_{D}(\mathbb {C}) \to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) is irreducible if whenever \(P\) is an orthogonal projection satisfying \(E(P M_{D}(\mathbb {C}) P) \subseteq P M_{D}(\mathbb {C}) P\), then \(P = 0\) or \(P = \mathbb {1}\). This is [ Wol12 , Theorem 6.2(1) ] . The definition applies to any linear map; complete positivity is not required.
A linear map \(L : M_{d}(\mathbb {C}) \to M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\) is conditionally completely positive (CCP) if it admits a generator decomposition, i.e. there exist a CP map \(\phi \) and a matrix \(\kappa \) such that \(L(\rho ) = \phi (\rho ) - \kappa \rho - \rho \kappa ^\dagger \). This is condition 1 of [ Wol12 , Proposition 7.2 ] .
Given a \(*\)-subalgebra \(S\subseteq M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), a linear map \(P:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) is a conditional expectation onto \(S\) if it is positive, idempotent, and unital, has range contained in \(S\), and satisfies \(P(X)=X\) for every \(X\in S\).
A linear map \(\mathcal S\) between matrix algebras is completely positive in rectangular Kraus form if there are finitely many operators \(A_i:H\to K\) such that
No trace-preservation normalization is imposed.
A linear map \(\mathcal{S}\) between matrix algebras is trace-preserving completely positive if it has a Kraus form \(\mathcal{S}(X)=\sum _i A_iXA_i^\dagger \) with \(\sum _i A_i^\dagger A_i=I\). The Kraus operators may be rectangular, so the input and output dimensions need not agree.
A bipartite matrix \(\rho \) on \(M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\otimes M_{d'}(\mathbb {C})\) is separable when it is a finite sum of Kronecker products of positive semidefinite matrices,
Let \(V:\mathbb {C}^k\to \mathbb {C}^D\) be an isometry, so that \(V^\dagger V=\mathbb {1}_k\). Define \(\iota _V:M_{k}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) by
The map \(\iota _V\) is complex-linear, multiplicative, and \(*\)-preserving. In general it is not unital: \(\iota _V(\mathbb {1}_k)=VV^\dagger \) is the projection onto the range of \(V\).
A linear map \(E : M_{D_{\rm in}}(\mathbb {C}) \to M_{D_{\rm out}}(\mathbb {C})\) is \(k\)-positive if \(E \otimes \operatorname{id}_{k}\) is positive from \(M_{D_{\rm in}}(\mathbb {C}) \otimes M_{k}(\mathbb {C})\) to \(M_{D_{\rm out}}(\mathbb {C}) \otimes M_{k}(\mathbb {C})\).
Assume in addition that the common average \(\bar\rho \) of Definition 13.6.56 is positive definite. Hayden–Jozsa–Petz–Winter instead reduce to this case by shrinking to the joint support of \(\rho _1,\ldots ,\rho _K\); that reduction is not re-derived here. By Lemma 13.6.57, \(\bar\rho \) is a positive definite fixed point of every \(F\in \mathbf F\), so Theorem 10.2.10 makes the fixed-point set of each adjoint map,
a \(*\)-subalgebra of \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\). The common invariant algebra is
and \(X\in A_0\) if and only if \(F^*(X)=X\) for every \(F\in \mathbf F\).
Let \(\rho _1,\ldots ,\rho _K\) be density matrices in \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), \(K\ge 1\). A trace-preserving completely positive Kraus family \(F\) preserves \(\rho _1,\ldots ,\rho _K\) if \(F\rho _k=\rho _k\) for every \(k\). Write
for the set of such operations – non-empty since the identity operation belongs to it – and
for their common average.
A Kossakowski form consists of \(H=H^\dagger \), a finite family of matrices \(\{ F_k\} _{k=0}^{n-1}\), and a positive semidefinite matrix \(C \in M_{n}(\mathbb {C})\), defining
In Wolf’s formula one takes \(\{ F_k\} \) to be a basis of traceless matrices; here we keep only the algebraic data needed for the conversion to Lindblad form.
The adjoint Kraus map is
When the \(\{ K_i\} \) are the matrices of an MPS tensor \(A\), this is the transfer map of the conjugate-transposed family \(i \mapsto (A^i)^\dagger \).
The Kraus commutant is
It is a \(*\)-subalgebra of \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\).
Let \(K=\{ K^i\} _{i=0}^{d-1}\) be a finite family of \(D\times D\) matrices. For a word \(w=(i_1,\ldots ,i_n)\), its word evaluation is
with the empty word evaluated as the identity matrix.
For \(\psi \in \mathbb {C}^D\) and \(m\in \mathbb N\), define
The Kraus family has eventually full vector spread if, for every sufficiently large \(m\) and every nonzero \(\psi \in \mathbb {C}^D\), \(H_m(K,\psi )=\mathbb {C}^D\). This is [ Wol12 , Theorem 6.8(2) ] .
For a finite Kraus family \(K_0,\ldots ,K_{d-1}\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) and \(N\in \mathbb N\), define
The empty product is the identity matrix.
Given operators \(\{ K_i\} _{i=0}^{d-1}\) with \(K_i \in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), the Kraus map is
A linear map is completely positive (Definition 2.1.5) if and only if it can be written in this form, as in (1).
Let
Write \(\iota _{\mathcal A},\pi _{\mathcal A}\) and \(\iota _{\mathcal B},\pi _{\mathcal B}\) for the corresponding block-diagonal embeddings and diagonal-block compressions. The canonical full-matrix extension of \(T:\mathcal A\to \mathcal B\) is
The map \(T\) is a direct-sum Kraus map when \(\widehat T\) has a Kraus representation.
Let \(\{ A_i\} _{i=0}^{d-1}\subseteq M_{D_1}(\mathbb {C})\) and \(\{ B_i\} _{i=0}^{d-1}\subseteq M_{D_2}(\mathbb {C})\). Their rectangular mixed Kraus map is the endomorphism of \(M_{D_1\times D_2}(\mathbb {C})\) given by
Its spectral radius is denoted by \(\varrho (\mathcal M_{A,B})\).
A map \(T:M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{d'}(\mathbb {C})\) has Kraus cardinality \(r\) if it has an exact \(r\)-operator Kraus representation. Its Kraus rank (Choi rank) is the rank of its Choi matrix, \(r=\operatorname {rank}(\tau )\); following [ Wol12 , Theorem 2.1, footnote ] , this is distinguished from the rank of \(T\) as a linear map.
Let \(A\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be Hermitian with eigenvalues \(\lambda _1\ge \lambda _2\ge \cdots \ge \lambda _D\) listed in decreasing order. For \(0\le k\le D\), set
This is the sum of the \(k\) largest signed eigenvalues. Indices beyond \(D\) contribute zero, so the value stabilizes at \(\operatorname{Re}\operatorname{tr}(A)\) once \(k\) reaches \(D\).
The Ky-Fan \(k\)-norm \(\| A\| _{(k)}\) is by definition the sum of the \(k\) largest singular values of \(A\). It agrees with \(S_k(A)\) exactly when \(A\) is positive semidefinite, where eigenvalues and singular values coincide; for an indefinite Hermitian \(A\) the two differ. For \(A=\operatorname{diag}(1,-2)\), one has \(S_1(A)=1\) but \(\| A\| _{(1)}=2\). The results below concern \(S_k(A)\) for arbitrary Hermitian \(A\), so on the positive-semidefinite cone they are statements about the Ky-Fan norm.
A Lindblad form consists of a Hermitian matrix \(H = H^\dagger \) (the Hamiltonian) and a family of matrices \(\{ L_j\} _{j=0}^{r-1}\) (the Lindblad operators), defining the linear map
where \([A,B] = AB - BA\) and \(\{ A,B\} _+ = AB + BA\). This is [ Wol12 , Equation (7.21) ] .
Let \(\mathcal L:M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{e}(\mathbb {C})\) be complex-linear. Its coefficient matrix \(C(\mathcal L)\in M_{e^2\times d^2}(\mathbb {C})\) in the matrix-unit bases is defined by
If a Stinespring matrix \(V:\mathbb {C}^{d_{\mathrm{in}}}\to \mathbb {C}^{d_{\mathrm{out}}}\) acts on the first factor while a finite-dimensional space \(R\) is left unchanged, the corresponding local Stinespring matrix is \(W=V\otimes \mathbb {1}_R\).
For a completely positive, trace-preserving qubit channel \(T' : M_{2}(\mathbb {C}) \to M_{2}(\mathbb {C})\), write \(\widehat{T'}\) for its matrix in the normalized Pauli basis \(\{ \sigma _{0}/\sqrt{2},\sigma _{1}/\sqrt{2}, \sigma _{2}/\sqrt{2},\sigma _{3}/\sqrt{2}\} \). The channel is in diagonal Lorentz normal form when it is unital and every off-diagonal entry of \(\widehat{T'}\) is zero.
For a completely positive, trace-preserving qubit channel \(T' : M_{2}(\mathbb {C}) \to M_{2}(\mathbb {C})\), write \(\widehat{T'}\) in the normalized Pauli basis. The channel is in non-diagonal Lorentz normal form when, for some \(x \in [0,1]\),
Trace preservation supplies the first row of the displayed matrix.
For a completely positive, trace-preserving qubit channel \(T' : M_{2}(\mathbb {C}) \to M_{2}(\mathbb {C})\), write \(\widehat{T'}\) in the normalized Pauli basis. The channel is in singular Lorentz normal form when
equivalently, every input state is mapped to \((1+\sigma _{3})/2\). Trace preservation supplies the first row of the displayed matrix.
A linear map \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) maps the positive semidefinite cone onto itself if \(T\) is positive and every positive semidefinite matrix is the image under \(T\) of a positive semidefinite matrix. This is condition (1) of [ Wol12 , Proposition 3.6 ] .
For every \(d\in \mathbb {N}\), define \(|\Omega \rangle \! \langle \Omega |\) on \(\mathbb {C}^d\otimes \mathbb {C}^d\) using
When \(d\geq 1\), this is the maximally entangled state: a rank-one projector with \((|\Omega \rangle \! \langle \Omega |)_{(i_1,i_2),(j_1,j_2)} = \frac{1}{d}\delta _{i_1 i_2}\delta _{j_1 j_2}\) and \(\operatorname{tr}(|\Omega \rangle \! \langle \Omega |)=1\).
Let \(H=\bigoplus _k H_k\) and \(K=\bigoplus _k K_k\). For each \(k\), let \((A_{k,a}:H_k\to K_k)_a\) be a finite family of operators, and let \(\widetilde A_{k,a}:H\to K\) agree with \(A_{k,a}\) on \(H_k\) and vanish on every other summand. The orthogonally controlled Kraus map is
In particular, \(\mathcal C(X)_{kl}=0\) for \(k\ne l\). This is the sector control in the definitions of \(\mathcal T_1\) and \(\mathcal S_1\) in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1523–1535 and 1548–1555 ] .
Let \(e:I\simeq J\) be an equivalence of index sets. The associated matrix reindexing is the linear map \(R_e:\mathbb {C}^{I\times I}\to \mathbb {C}^{J\times J}\) determined by
For a matrix \(X\) on \(A\otimes B\), the right partial trace is the linear map from matrices on \(A\otimes B\) to matrices on \(A\) given by
After the retained and discarded subspins have been regrouped as \(A\otimes B\), this is the partial-trace ingredient of the maps \(\mathcal T_0\) and \(\mathcal S_0\) in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1521–1522 and 1547 ] .
Let \(\rho \) be a matrix on a finite-dimensional space \(B\). The state-preparation map from matrices on \(A\) to matrices on \(A\otimes B\) is
This is the elementary preparation operation used in the maps \(\mathcal T_1\) and \(\mathcal S_1\) of [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1527–1533 and 1551–1555 ] . It is relocated here from the MPDO renormalization chapter; its Kraus-action and conditional-expectation consequences for the density-operator setting appear in Section 1.8 below.
Let \(E_{k\ell }\) denote the matrix unit with its only nonzero entry in row \(k\) and column \(\ell \). The transfer matrix \(\widehat T\) is the matrix indexed by pairs of bond indices with entries
Equivalently, this is the matrix of \(T\) under the column-stacking identification \(M_D(\mathbb C)\cong \mathbb C^{D^2}\): the matrix-units special case of Definition 3.18.2.
A multi-cycle decomposition of \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) consists of a finite cycle index set \(\iota \), a per-cycle period \(m:\iota \to \mathbb {N}_{{\gt}0}\), and a family of orthogonal projections \(P_{c,k}\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) for \(c\in \iota \) and \(k\in \{ 0,\ldots ,m(c){-}1\} \). For every \(c\in \iota \) and \(k\in \{ 0,\ldots ,m(c){-}1\} \), the per-cycle cyclic action is \(T(P_{c,k+1})=P_{c,k}\). The multiplicative-domain factorizations are \(T(P_{c,k}X)=T(P_{c,k})T(X)\) and \(T(XP_{c,k})=T(X)T(P_{c,k})\).
A multi-cycle decomposition gives a single-index block-permutation structure on the disjoint-union index \(\Sigma _{c\in \iota }\{ 0,\ldots ,m(c){-}1\} \): the permutation is the product of the per-cycle cyclic shifts \(k\mapsto k+1\), whose cycle decomposition has one cycle per \(c\in \iota \); the projections are \((c,k)\mapsto P_{c,k}\); and the multiplicative-domain factorizations descend componentwise. The resulting map forgets the explicit cycle indexing.
The Naimark isometry \(V:\mathbb {C}^D\to \mathbb {C}^D\otimes \mathbb {C}^n\) of a POVM is the Stinespring-type construction
For a POVM \(\{ E_i\} \), each effect \(E_i\ge 0\) admits a square-root factorisation \(E_i=M_i^\dagger M_i\) with \(M_i\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\). The operators \(M_i\) are the Naimark Kraus square roots.
The Naimark projectors on \(\mathbb {C}^D\otimes \mathbb {C}^n\) are
Following Lewenstein–Kraus–Cirac–Horodecki [ LKCH00 ] , a normalized decomposable witness is an operator of the form
The transpose remains on Wolf’s first tensor factor.
Let \(I\) be finite and let \(A=\mathbb {R}^I\), with coordinatewise multiplication and the faithful positive functional \(\varphi (x)=\sum _{i\in I}x_i\). Its strictly positive invertible cone is
and the induced Hilbert norm and Nowosad functional are
For \(w\in A\), write \(P(w)=\operatorname {alg}_{\mathbb {R}}\{ w,w^{-1}\} \) for its Laurent-polynomial subalgebra.
For a Kraus map \(E\), define
We follow the convention that \(\mathcal{A}_R(E)\) controls right multiplication and \(\mathcal{A}_L(E)\) controls left multiplication. These are Kraus-map specializations of the preceding abstract domains, with the names interchanged: here the subscript records the side on which the varying factor is appended, whereas the preceding convention records the side occupied by the fixed element.
For a finite family of matrices \(\{ C_i\} _{i\in \iota }\) and a defect block \(S\), one forms an isometric dilation whose rows are the adjoints of the matrices \(C_i\) together with the adjoint of \(S\). One also forms the scalar block-diagonal matrix whose \(\iota \)-blocks carry prescribed weights and whose defect block carries a single scalar.
A subspace \(S\subseteq \bigoplus _{k{\lt}r}M_{d_k}(\mathbb {C})\) is an operator system if it contains the unit and is closed under the entrywise adjoint: \(\mathbb 1\in S\) and \(X\in S\implies X^\dagger \in S\), where \(X^\dagger \) denotes the family \((X_k^\dagger )_{k{\lt}r}\).
Let \(V:\mathbb {C}^d\to \mathbb {C}^{d'}\otimes \mathbb {C}^r\) be a supplied Stinespring matrix, and let \(|\Omega \rangle =d'^{-1/2}\sum _{a=1}^{d'}|a,a\rangle \) be normalized. Wolf’s auxiliary operator is
or, in coordinates, \(W_{j,(i,a)}=d'^{-1/2}V_{(a,j),i}\).
Let \(\{ \psi _k\} _{k {\lt} m}\) be an ensemble and let \(n\) be a natural number. The padded ensemble \(\{ \psi _k^{\mathrm{pad}}\} _{k {\lt} n}\) is \(\psi _k\) for \(k {\lt} m\) and the zero vector for \(m \le k {\lt} n\). For \(m \le n\) the padded family agrees with \(\psi \) on every index \(k {\lt} m\) and retains the whole ensemble; for \(n {\lt} m\) only the first \(n\) vectors survive. The intended use is \(m \le n\).
Let \(X \in M_{d \cdot d'}(\mathbb {C})\) be a bipartite matrix indexed by \((\{ 0,\ldots ,d-1\} \times \{ 0,\ldots ,d'-1\} )^2\). The left partial trace \(\operatorname{tr}_A(X)\) and right partial trace \(\operatorname{tr}_B(X)\) are the \(d' \times d'\) and \(d \times d\) matrices defined by
For an operator \(\rho \) on \(H_L\otimes H_R\), define \((\operatorname{tr}_L\rho )_{r,s}:=\sum _l\rho _{(l,r),(l,s)}\).
Let \(\sigma \) be positive semidefinite on \(H_L\otimes H_R\), and set \(\tau =\operatorname{tr}_R\sigma \). The Petz transpose formula on the support of \(\tau \) is
This is the support formula of [ HJPW04 , Theorem 3, equation (8) ] . It is not asserted to be trace preserving on operators outside the support of \(\tau \).
For a bipartite matrix \(\rho \) on \(M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\otimes M_{d'}(\mathbb {C})\), the partial transpose over the first factor is the matrix \(\rho ^{T_1}\) with entries
transposing the first index pair \(i,j\) and fixing the second pair \(k,l\).
For a bipartite matrix \(\rho \) on \(M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\otimes M_{d'}(\mathbb {C})\), the partial transpose over the second factor is the matrix \(\rho ^{T_2}\) with entries
transposing the second index pair \(k,l\) and fixing the first pair \(i,j\).
Define Pauli time reversal by \(\Theta (X)=\operatorname{tr}(X)\mathbb {1}-X\). Its Pauli transfer matrix is
For a linear map \(T:M_{2}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{2}(\mathbb {C})\), define its Pauli-block diagonal truncation by
This is the truncation in
[
Wol12
, Proposition 2.10, Section 2.4
]
; see also the local source Notes/WolfNoteTexSource/ch02_representations.tex, lines 984–998.
Every Hermitian matrix \(M\in M_2^\dagger (\mathbb {C})\) has unique real Pauli coordinates \(x=(x_0,x_1,x_2,x_3)\) such that
This identifies \(M_2^\dagger (\mathbb {C})\) with \(\mathbb {R}^4\). Write
for the Minkowski quadratic form, its matrix, and the closed future cone. These are the coordinates used immediately before
[
Wol12
, Eq. (2.41)
]
; see also the local source Notes/WolfNoteTexSource/ch02_representations.tex, lines 1040–1044.
- Wolf.pauliMatrices_zero
- Wolf.pauliMatrices_succ
- Wolf.pauliMatrices_isHermitian
- Wolf.trace_pauliMatrices_mul_pauliMatrices
- Wolf.pauliMatrixOfMinkowski
- Wolf.pauliMatrixOfMinkowski_isHermitian
- Wolf.minkowskiQuadratic
- Wolf.minkowskiBilinear
- Wolf.minkowskiMetric
- Wolf.minkowskiQuadratic_eq_bilinear_self
- Wolf.minkowskiBilinear_eq_dotProduct_metric_mulVec
- Wolf.minkowskiBilinear_polarization
- Wolf.minkowskiMetric_mul_self
- Wolf.trace_pauliMatrixOfMinkowski
- Wolf.InFutureCone
- Wolf.trace_mul_eq_ofReal_re_of_isHermitian
- Wolf.pauliMinkowskiCoordinate
- Wolf.pauliMinkowskiCoordinate_pauliMatrixOfMinkowski
- Wolf.coe_pauliMinkowskiCoordinate
- Wolf.pauliMatrixOfMinkowski_pauliMinkowskiCoordinate
- Wolf.pauliMatrixOfMinkowskiLinearMap
- Wolf.pauliMinkowskiCoordinateLinearMap
- Wolf.pauliMinkowskiEquiv
- Wolf.pauliMinkowskiEquiv_apply
- Wolf.pauliMinkowskiEquiv_symm_apply
Let \(\sigma _0=\mathbb {1},\sigma _1,\sigma _2,\sigma _3\) be the Pauli matrices. The Pauli transfer matrix of a linear map \(T:M_{2}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{2}(\mathbb {C})\) is \(\widehat T\in M_4(\mathbb {C})\) with entries
We write
where \(\Delta =(\widehat T_{ij})_{i,j=1}^{3}\). Thus \(r^{\mathsf T}\) and \(v\) are exactly the two off-diagonal Pauli blocks. This is the representation used in [ Wol12 , Section 2.4, Eq. (2.39) ] .
The peripheral eigenvalues of a linear map \(E\) on a finite-dimensional space are the eigenvalues \(\lambda \) on the unit circle: \(|\lambda | = 1\). For a channel, the spectral radius is \(1\) [ Wol12 , Proposition 6.1 ] , so these coincide with the eigenvalues of maximal modulus.
The condition \(|\lambda | = 1\) is appropriate for channels, since the spectral radius of a channel is \(1\); for a general linear map with spectral radius \(r \neq 1\) the condition would generalise to \(|\lambda | = r\).
The map \(T_\phi \) is the projection onto the peripheral subspace along the non-peripheral subspace. The phase-weighted peripheral map is Wolf’s asymptotic dynamics \(T_\varphi =T\circ T_\phi \).
Let \(T\) be an endomorphism of a finite-dimensional complex vector space. Its peripheral subspace is the sum of the maximal generalized eigenspaces for eigenvalues \(\mu \) with \(|\mu |=1\); its non-peripheral subspace is the corresponding sum for the remaining eigenvalues. This is the splitting induced by the full spectral decomposition of [ Wol12 , Equation (6.5) ] , with the peripheral projection itself defined in [ Wol12 , Equation (6.12) ] .
A linear map \(T : M_{D}(\mathbb {C}) \to M_{D'}(\mathbb {C})\) between matrix algebras of possibly different dimensions is positive if \(T(X) \ge 0\) whenever \(X \ge 0\), where \(X \ge 0\) means that \(X\) is positive semidefinite. For \(D' = D\) this is the notion of Definition 2.1.1.
A positive operator-valued measure with \(n\) outcomes on \(\mathbb {C}^D\) is a family \(\{ E_i\} _{i=0}^{n-1}\) of positive semidefinite operators on \(\mathbb {C}^D\) satisfying the resolution of identity
Given an isometry \(V:\mathbb {C}^D\to \mathbb {C}^{d'}\) with \(V^\dagger V=\mathbb {1}_D\) and a family \(\{ P_i\} _{i=0}^{n-1}\) of positive semidefinite operators on \(\mathbb {C}^{d'}\) summing to the identity, the pulled-back operators \(E_i:=V^\dagger P_iV\) form a POVM. In particular, any projective measurement on the dilation (a special case of a PSD resolution of identity) pulls back to a POVM.
For each ray \(p\), fix a nonzero representative \(p^{\mathrm{rep}}\). Define
Given a finite family \(\{ \psi _i\} _{i \in \iota }\) of (unnormalized) vectors in \(\mathbb {C}^D\), its pure-ensemble density is \(\rho = \sum _i |\psi _i\rangle \! \langle \psi _i|\). Weights \(p_i \geq 0\) with \(\sum p_i = 1\) can be absorbed by replacing \(\psi _i \mapsto \sqrt{p_i} \psi _i\).
For matrices \(\rho ,\sigma \in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), define the trace-log expression
On the physical domain where \(\rho \) is a density matrix and \(\sigma \) is positive definite, this is the Umegaki relative entropy.
A real-eigenvalue block is the ordinary real Jordan block \(J_n(a)\) with eigenvalue \(a\) and ones on its first superdiagonal. If \(a\pm \tau i\) is a non-real conjugate pair, put
Its real Jordan chain of length \(m\) has \(B(a,\tau )\) on the block diagonal and \(I_2\) on the first block superdiagonal. On the product indexing of this \(2m\)-dimensional real block, its unsigned metric reverses both the chain coordinate and the two-dimensional realification coordinate. No sign characteristic is attached to a non-real block.
For a complex-linear map \(\mathcal L:M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{e}(\mathbb {C})\), its unnormalized rectangular Choi matrix \(J(\mathcal L)\in M_{de}(\mathbb {C})\) is the reshaping
When \(d=e\), this is \(d\) times the normalized Choi matrix convention in [ Wol12 , Proposition 2.1 ] .
A complex-linear map \(\mathcal L:M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{e}(\mathbb {C})\) is a Hilbert–Schmidt contraction if, for every \(X\in M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\),
Let \(\tau \) be a Hermitian operator on \(\mathbb {C}^{D'}\otimes \mathbb {C}^{D}\) with normalized eigenvectors \(\phi _i\). The reduced density operator of the \(i\)-th eigenvector on the first factor is \(\rho _i=\operatorname{tr}_2|\phi _i\rangle \! \langle \phi _i|\).
For square complex matrices \(\rho \) and \(\omega \) and every \(\alpha \in \mathbb {R}\), set
Real powers are defined by continuous functional calculus, with negative powers equal to zero on the zero eigenspace. Thus \(\widetilde Q_\alpha \) is total even when \(\alpha =0\) or \(\omega \) is singular. For \(\alpha {\gt}1\), on positive semidefinite inputs satisfying \(\ker \omega \subseteq \ker \rho \), this convention gives the finite sandwiched Rényi trace term. In this regime, if the support inclusion fails, the totalized value remains finite but is not the divergence trace term.
For square matrices \(\rho \) and \(\omega \) of the same size, define
The negative power is defined by functional calculus and vanishes on the kernel of \(\omega \). On trace-one positive semidefinite matrices satisfying \(\ker \omega \subseteq \ker \rho \), its logarithm is the order-two sandwiched Rényi divergence [ MLDS\(^{+}\)13 , Definition 2 ] .
For a matrix \(A\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), the singular values \(s_0(A),s_1(A),\ldots \) form a finitely supported family: only finitely many are nonzero. The Schatten one-norm of \(A\) is their sum, that is, the sum of the finitely many nonzero singular values:
This is the \(p=1\) case of the Schatten \(p\)-norm [ Wol12 , Chapter 8, Section 8.1 ] . The equivalent closed formula \(\lVert A\rVert _1=\sum _{i=0}^{D-1}s_i(A)\), summing over all \(D\) singular values including trailing zeros, is part of Theorem 13.1.4.
For \(\psi \in \mathbb {C}^{d_A}\otimes \mathbb {C}^{d_B}\) with \(d=\min \{ d_A,d_B\} \), a Schmidt decomposition of \(\psi \) is a choice of orthonormal bases \(\{ e_j\in \mathbb {C}^{d_A}\} \), \(\{ f_j\in \mathbb {C}^{d_B}\} \) and nonnegative reals \(\lambda _j\), \(j=1,\ldots ,d\), satisfying
A vector \(\psi \in \mathbb {C}^{D}\otimes \mathbb {C}^{k}\) is identified with its coefficient matrix \(C_\psi \in M_{D,k}(\mathbb {C})(\mathbb {C})\). Its Schmidt rank is \(\operatorname{SR}(\psi )=\operatorname{rank}(C_\psi )\). We write \(\operatorname{SR}(\psi )\le r\) for the corresponding bounded-rank condition.
For a matrix \(\tau \) on \(\mathbb {C}^{D'}\otimes \mathbb {C}^{D}\) and a bound \(n\), the set
collects the real parts of the quadratic forms of \(\tau \) in the normalized vectors of Schmidt rank at most \(n\). For Hermitian \(\tau \), the setting of every statement below, the quadratic form is real and \(E_n(\tau )\) is the set of expectations of \(\tau \) in those vectors.
For Hermitian data \(F_i\), the traces \(\operatorname{tr}(F_iX)\) are real; define \(T(X)_i=\operatorname{tr}(F_iX)\). Then \(T^*(y)=\sum _i y_iF_i\). Consequently the conic primal constraint is precisely \(X\geq 0\) and \(\operatorname{tr}(F_iX)=b_i\), while conic dual feasibility is precisely \(F_0-\sum _i y_iF_i\geq 0\). The two conic strict-feasibility predicates become, respectively, \(X{\gt}0\) with the trace constraints and \(F_0-\sum _i y_iF_i{\gt}0\), exactly as in [ Wol12 , Chapter 4, lines 85–105 ] .
- SemidefiniteProgram.traceAnalysisMap
- SemidefiniteProgram.traceAnalysisMap_apply
- SemidefiniteProgram.traceAnalysisMap_apply_eq_re_trace
- SemidefiniteProgram.traceAnalysisMap_apply_eq_trace
- SemidefiniteProgram.hermitianSum
- SemidefiniteProgram.toMatrix_hermitianSum
- SemidefiniteProgram.traceAnalysisMap_adjoint
- SemidefiniteProgram.mem_primalFeasible_iff
- SemidefiniteProgram.mem_dualFeasible_iff
- SemidefiniteProgram.isPrimalStrictlyFeasible_iff
- SemidefiniteProgram.isDualStrictlyFeasible_iff
Let \(d\ge 1\). A symmetric informationally complete family in dimension \(d\) consists of \(d^2\) rank-one orthogonal projections \(P_i\in M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\) satisfying
The sip matrix of size \(n\) is \(P_n\). A signed sip block is \(\varepsilon P_n\), where \(\varepsilon =1\) or \(\varepsilon =-1\). Each such block is symmetric, invertible, and its own inverse.
For \(X\in \operatorname{SL}(2,\mathbb {C})\), let \(L(X)\) be the real linear transformation of \(\mathbb {R}^4\) determined by Wolf’s Hermitian congruence
Its Pauli-basis entries are
The trace is real. This is the four-dimensional action in [ Wol12 , Eq. (2.41) ] ; it is not the three-dimensional adjoint action \(M\mapsto UMU^{-1}\) on traceless Pauli matrices. The special orthochronous Lorentz group is described, in the row-action convention of the source, by
Regard \(\mathrm{SO}^+(1,3)\) from (95) as a matrix group. The spinor action defines the homomorphism
Let \(S\) be a \(*\)-subalgebra of \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), and let \(W,W'\subseteq \mathbb {C}^D\). A linear operator \(f:\mathbb {C}^D\to \mathbb {C}^D\) is an intertwiner from \(W\) into \(W'\) when \(f(W)\subseteq W'\) and \(f(Ax)=A(fx)\) for every \(A\in S\) and \(x\in W\).
Let \(S\) be a \(*\)-subalgebra of \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\). A subspace \(W\subseteq \mathbb {C}^D\) is irreducible under \(S\) when it is nonzero, invariant under every member of \(S\), and its only invariant subspaces are \(\{ 0\} \) and \(W\).
Let \(S\) be a \(*\)-subalgebra of \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), and let \(W,W'\subseteq \mathbb {C}^D\) be invariant under \(S\). The pieces \(W\) and \(W'\) are of the same type when there is an intertwiner from \(W\) into \(W'\) that is nonzero on \(W\).
For an irreducible channel \(E\) on \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) with \(D\geq 1\), the stationary state is the unique density-matrix fixed point \(\rho _\infty \) satisfying \(E(\rho _\infty )=\rho _\infty \), \(\rho _\infty {\gt}0\), and \(\operatorname{tr}(\rho _\infty )=1\). Existence, uniqueness, and positive definiteness follow from Theorem 8.14.1.
Given possibly rectangular Kraus operators \(K_j:\mathbb {C}^{d_{\mathrm{in}}}\to \mathbb {C}^{d_{\mathrm{out}}}\), the Stinespring matrix \(V:\mathbb {C}^{d_{\mathrm{in}}}\to \mathbb {C}^{d_{\mathrm{out}}}\otimes \mathbb {C}^r\) is defined by
Thus \(V=\sum _j K_j\otimes |j\rangle \). It is an isometry precisely when the Kraus family satisfies the trace-preserving normalization.
Let \(\tau =\sum _i\lambda _i|i\rangle \! \langle i|\) be positive semidefinite. Its inverse square root on the support is
For a positive semidefinite matrix \(\rho \ge 0\), the support projection \(P\) is the orthogonal projection onto the range of \(\rho \). Via the spectral decomposition \(\rho =U\operatorname{diag}(\lambda _1,\ldots ,\lambda _D)U^\dagger \), it is
where \(\mathbf{1}_{\lambda _j{\gt}0}\) is \(1\) if \(\lambda _j{\gt}0\) and \(0\) otherwise.
Let \(\tau \geq 0\). Its support-restricted negative quarter power \(\tau ^{-1/4}_{\operatorname {supp}}\) acts by \(x^{-1/4}\) on every positive eigenspace and vanishes on the kernel. For a complex-linear map \(\Phi \), define
For a real parameter \(\eta \), the map \(T_\eta \) on \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) is
The map is defined for every real \(\eta \); at \(\eta =0\) it reduces to \(\rho \mapsto \operatorname{tr}(\rho ) \mathbb {1}\), and the positivity threshold below assumes \(\eta {\gt}0\).
Given a linear map \(T : M_{D}(\mathbb {C}) \to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), the tensor extension \(T \otimes \operatorname{id}\) acts on bipartite matrices \(X \in M_{D \times D}(\mathbb {C})\) by applying \(T\) to each “slice”:
where \(X^{(i_2,j_2)}_{ab} = X_{(a,i_2),(b,j_2)}\) is the bipartite slice.
A Kraus map is trace-preserving if \(\sum _{i=0}^{d-1} K_i^\dagger K_i = \mathbb {1}\). Equivalently, the adjoint Kraus map is unital. This is the standard MPS normalization condition. In the later gauge language it is the left-canonical condition, so Kadison–Schwarz arguments are often applied to the adjoint map.
For \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), let \(T_\phi \) be its peripheral spectral projection and define
This is Wolf’s notation in [ Wol12 , Chapter 8, Proposition “Convergence towards asymptotic states”, Eq. (8.112) ] .
The trace-pairing adjoint \(E^* : M_{D'}(\mathbb {C}) \to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) of a linear map \(E : M_{D}(\mathbb {C}) \to M_{D'}(\mathbb {C})\) between matrix algebras of possibly different dimensions is the adjoint for the bilinear pairing \((A,B)\mapsto \operatorname{tr}(AB)\).
A basis \(\{ \sigma _i\} _i\) of \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) is trace-self-dual when its coordinate functionals are given by trace pairing:
For any matrix \(Y\in M_{D'}(\mathbb {C})\), define \(T'_Y:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D'}(\mathbb {C})\) by
A linear map \(T : M_{D}(\mathbb {C}) \to M_{D'}(\mathbb {C})\) between matrix algebras of possibly different dimensions is trace-preserving if \(\operatorname{tr}(T(X)) = \operatorname{tr}(X)\) for all \(X\). For \(D' = D\) this is the notion of Definition 2.1.2.
For a tripartite matrix \(\rho _{ABC}\) on \(\mathbb {C}^{d_A} \otimes \mathbb {C}^{d_B} \otimes \mathbb {C}^{d_C}\), the partial trace over \(A\) is
The transfer map associated to a finite matrix family \(A\) is the finite Kraus map of that family; the notation \(\mathcal{E}_A\) abbreviates the linear map \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C}) \to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) defined by
For a linear map \(T:M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\) and a family \((\sigma _\alpha )\) in \(M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\) used on both sides, the transfer matrix of \(T\) in \((\sigma _\alpha )\) is
which is [ Wol12 , Equation (2.20) ] with \(F_\alpha =G_\alpha \).
For matrices \(A,B\) on \(M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\) and the SWAP operator \(F\) on \(M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\otimes M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\), the transposition witness is \(W=(A\otimes B)\, F\, (A\otimes B)^\dagger \). These are the entanglement witnesses associated with the transposition map.
For Pauli directions \(a,b\in \{ x,y,z\} \) and real rates \(\gamma _a,\gamma _b\), define
In particular, \(\mathcal L_{a,b}(\mathbb {1})=0\).
For a unitary matrix \(U \in \mathcal{U}(D)\), the unitary channel is \(T(\rho )=U\rho U^\dagger \). It is automatically a quantum channel.
The four source-indexed patterns are: four real one-dimensional blocks; one two-dimensional non-real conjugate-pair block and two real one-dimensional blocks; one real Jordan block of size two and two real one-dimensional blocks; or one real Jordan block of size three and one real one-dimensional block.
The fixed-length vector span at length \(n\) is
This is \(S_n(K)|\varphi \rangle \) in the notation of [ SPGWC10 ] .
For a Hermitian matrix \(\rho \in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) with eigenvalues \(\lambda _0,\ldots ,\lambda _{D-1}\), the von Neumann entropy is
where \(0\log 0:=0\).
Let \(T\) be an endomorphism of a complex vector space and let \(s\) be a finite set of complex numbers. The phase-weighted Cesàro mean of \(T\) over \(s\) is
Taking for \(s\) the eigenvalues of \(T\) of modulus one gives the averages of [ Wol12 , Equation (6.15) ] .
For matrices \(\sigma \in \mathbb C^{I\times I}\) and \(\tau \in \mathbb C^{J\times J}\) and a complex-linear map \(\Phi :\mathbb C^{I\times I}\to \mathbb C^{J\times J}\), define
At a threshold \(n\), the vector-spread clause says that, for every \(m\geq n\) and every nonzero \(\psi \in \mathbb {C}^D\), \(K_m|\psi \rangle =\mathbb {C}^D\). At a threshold \(q\), the word-span clause says \(K_m=M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) for every \(m\geq q\), while the Choi clause says \(\tau _m{\gt}0\) for every \(m\geq q\). These are the direct quantified clauses in [ Wol12 , Theorem 6.8(2–4) ] .
For a finite-dimensional complex endomorphism \(T\), let
We use the explicit convention \(\mu (T)=0\) when the displayed spectrum is empty. If it is nonempty, the spectrum is finite, so the supremum is an attained maximum and \(\mu (T){\lt}1\).
Let \(S\) be invertible and suppose that \(S\mathbf1=S^{\mathsf T}\mathbf1=s\mathbf1\), where \(s{\gt}0\). For
a second positive point \(a\) is transformed to
where powers are taken coordinatewise.
For \(x\colon \mathbb {Z}/d\mathbb {Z}\to \mathbb {R}\), define the forward denominator and homogeneous functional
For the standard character \(\chi _j\) of \(\mathbb {Z}/d\mathbb {Z}\), the corresponding cyclic matrix eigenvalue is
These are Yamagami’s parameters with stride \(l=1\). Negating the cyclic index converts this forward window to the backward window in the Choi-type rank-one weight.
For a non-negative family \(f_{0},\ldots ,f_{D-1}\) of real numbers, or more generally for a non-negative family indexed by a finite set with \(D\) elements,
For \(A\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) and a complex-linear map \(S:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\),
If \(\psi \) and \(\phi \) are orthogonal unit vectors, then \(\lVert |\psi \rangle \! \langle \psi |-|\phi \rangle \! \langle \phi |\rVert _2=\sqrt2\). Consequently the orthogonal-pure-state supremum for \(S\) is at most \(\sqrt D\, \lVert S\rVert _{2\to 2}\sqrt2\). These are precisely the estimates in Wolf Equations (8.115)–(8.116).
Let \(T:M_D(\mathbb {C})\to M_D(\mathbb {C})\) be a positive linear map and let \([a_{ij}]_{i,j=1}^n\) be a positive semidefinite block matrix with entries in \(M_D(\mathbb {C})\) such that the images \(T(a_{ij})\) pairwise commute. Then
for every family of vectors \(\{ \psi _i\} _{i=1}^n\subset \mathbb {C}^D\).
If \(U\) is antisymmetric, \(U^{\mathsf T}=-U\), and a contraction, \(U^{\dagger }U\le \mathbb {1}\), then for every vector \(v\) the image \(T_{\mathrm{BH}}(|v\rangle \langle v|)\) of the rank-one operator \(|v\rangle \langle v|\) is positive semidefinite.
Let \(E\) be a quantum channel, \(\rho \in \mathcal{D}_D\), and \(\psi :\mathbb {N}\to \mathbb {N}\) satisfy \(\psi (k)\to \infty \). If
then \(\sigma \in \mathcal{D}_D\) and \(E(\sigma )=\sigma \).
Let \(T : M_{D}(\mathbb {C}) \to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be a linear map, \(\widehat{T}\) its matrix with respect to the matrix-unit basis and \(\tau \) its Choi–Jamiołkowski operator. Then
Equivalently \(\widehat{T}=D\, \tau ^{\Gamma }\), where the involution \(\tau \mapsto \tau ^{\Gamma }\) is defined by \(\langle m,n|\tau ^{\Gamma }|k,\ell \rangle =\langle m,k|\tau |n,\ell \rangle \). This is [ Wol12 , Eq. (2.22) ] .
Let \(A \in M_{m \times n}(\mathbb {C})\) and \(B \in M_{n \times m}(\mathbb {C})\). Then the charpoly-root entropy sum is invariant under the cyclic swap \(AB \mapsto BA\):
with roots counted with algebraic multiplicity.
Let \(D\geq 1\). Two linear maps \(T,S:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) with the same Choi matrix are equal.
For arbitrary \(Y\in M_{D'}(\mathbb {C})\), the rectangular (output-factor-first) Choi matrix of \(T'_Y\) is
See [ Wol12 , Chapter 8, Eq. (8.86) ] .
With the notation of Lemma 3.17.2,
For \(D\geq 1\) this is [ Wol12 , Eq. (6.28) ] , which states it in the divided form \(\operatorname{tr}[\tau ^\dagger \tau ]=D^{-2}\operatorname{tr}[\widehat{T}^\dagger \widehat{T}]\).
Write \(\tau _T\) for the Choi matrix of \(T\). For all linear maps \(T,S:M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{d'}(\mathbb {C})\), all \(c\in \mathbb {C}\), all finite index sets \(s\) and all families \((T_i)_{i\in s}\),
Let \(d\ge 2\) and let \(x_i\ge 0\) be indexed by \(\mathbb {Z}/d\mathbb {Z}\). Then, with zero-denominator summands read as \(0\),
Consequently, for \(n=1\) and \(x_i=|v_i|^2\), the reciprocal sum of the rank-one weights \(a_i=(d-1)x_i+x_{i-1}\) is at most \(1\).
Let \(x_i\ge 0\) be indexed by a finite set, let \(T=\sum _j x_j\), and let \(\sigma \) be a permutation of the index set. Then, with zero-denominator summands read as \(0\),
Assume \(n\le d-2\). If, with the convention that the summand is \(0\) at indices where \(a_i=0\), \(\sum _i |v_i|^2/a_i\le 1\), where \(a_i\) is the weight of Definition 4.8.1.17, then \(T_C(|v\rangle \! \langle v|)\ge 0\).
Let \(d\ge 3\) and \(n=d-2\). With \(x_i=|v_i|^2\) and \(T=\sum _j x_j\), the Choi rank-one diagonal weight equals
Let \(s\subseteq \mathbb {C}\) be a finite set. Assume that for every \(\mu \in s\) there exists an exponent \(p_\mu {\gt}0\) with \(\mu ^{p_\mu }=1\). Then there exists \(p{\gt}0\) such that \(\mu ^p=1\) for all \(\mu \in s\).
For \(X\in M_{d\times k}(\mathbb {C})\), the vector
has Schmidt rank at most \(k\).
Let \(T\) be irreducible, let \(P_0,\ldots ,P_{m-1}\) be orthogonal projections summing to \(\mathbb {1}\) and cyclically permuted by \(T\), and suppose that every orthogonal projection \(Q\) with \(QP_k=P_kQ=Q\) that is invariant under the corner restriction of \(T^m\) to \(P_kM_{D}(\mathbb {C})P_k\) admits an orthogonal projection \(R\) invariant under \(T\) on the full algebra with \(Q=0\iff R=0\) and \(Q=P_k\iff R=\mathbb {1}\). Then, for every \(k\), the restriction of \(T^m\) to the corner \(P_kM_{D}(\mathbb {C})P_k\) is irreducible.
Let \(D{\gt}0\). The completely positive maps form a closed subset of the endomorphisms of \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) in the operator norm. In particular, if every \(S_N:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) is completely positive and \(S_N\to P\) in the operator norm, then \(P\) is completely positive.
Let \(f:\mathbb {R}\to \mathbb {R}\) be convex on \([0,\infty )\), let \(A\) be a positive semidefinite matrix on a finite-dimensional space indexed by \(n\), and let \(v\in \mathbb {C}^n\) satisfy \(\langle v,v\rangle =1\). Then
where \(f(A)\) is defined by the Hermitian continuous functional calculus.
Let \(a_i\ge 0\) and suppose \(v_i=0\) whenever \(a_i=0\). If, with the convention that \(|v_i|^2/a_i\) is read as \(0\) when \(a_i=0\), \(\sum _i |v_i|^2/a_i\le 1\), then \(\operatorname{diag}(a_i)-|v\rangle \! \langle v|\ge 0\).
Let \(\Phi :\mathcal A\simeq \mathcal B\) match the simple summands by an equivalence \(\sigma :I\simeq J\), with \(D_i=E_{\sigma (i)}\). Suppose that there are unitaries \(U_i\) satisfying \(\Phi (0,\ldots ,0,X,0,\ldots ,0)_{\sigma (i)} =U_i\iota _i(X)U_i^*\). Then \(\Phi \) preserves the total block trace.
A coordinatewise family of completely positive maps between paired summands determines a direct-sum Kraus map. For direct-sum Kraus maps \(T:\mathcal A\to \mathcal B\) and \(S:\mathcal B\to \mathcal C\), one has \(\widehat{S\circ T}=\widehat S\circ \widehat T\), and \(S\circ T\) is again a direct-sum Kraus map. If an endomorphism \(T:\mathcal A\to \mathcal A\) has an extension satisfying
then \(T\) satisfies the corresponding inequality in every summand. Finally, if \(F:\mathcal A\to \mathcal A\) is a trace-preserving direct-sum Kraus map, then its trace adjoint satisfies, for every \(X\in \mathcal A\),
in every summand.
For maps \(T:\mathcal A\to \mathcal B\) and \(S:\mathcal B\to \mathcal C\), trace adjoints satisfy
If \(T\) preserves the total trace, then \(T^*(\mathbb {1}_{\mathcal B})=\mathbb {1}_{\mathcal A}\). If \(\widehat T\) admits a Kraus representation, then so does \(\widehat{T^*}\); in particular, both \(T\) and \(T^*\) send families of positive semidefinite matrices to positive semidefinite families. These statements are only the adjoint and positivity part of the classification argument; none of its multiplicative or blockwise conclusions is asserted here.
- Matrix.sum_trace_directSumTraceAdjointMapBetween_mul
- Matrix.directSumTraceAdjointMapBetween_involutive
- Matrix.directSumTraceAdjointMapBetween_id
- Matrix.directSumTraceAdjointMapBetween_comp
- Matrix.directSumTraceAdjointMapBetween_self
- Matrix.IsTracePreservingBetweenDirectSums.directSumTraceAdjointMapBetween_one
- Matrix.traceAdjointMap_directSumMapExtension
- IsKrausCP.traceAdjointMap
- Matrix.IsKrausDirectSumMap.map_posSemidef
- Matrix.IsKrausDirectSumMap.directSumTraceAdjointMapBetween
For a Hermitian operator \(\tau \) with normalized eigenvectors \(\phi _i\), the eigenvector overlaps recover the squared norm of \(\psi \):
For a Hermitian operator \(\tau \) with eigenvalues \(\nu _i\) and normalized eigenvectors \(\phi _i\), the expectation in a vector \(\psi \) expands as
The von Neumann entropy of a Hermitian matrix is the \(-x\log x\) sum over the real parts of the roots of its characteristic polynomial \(\chi _\rho \):
Let \(T:M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{d'}(\mathbb {C})\) have Choi matrix \(\tau \). For every \(V\in M_{d\times k}(\mathbb {C})\),
Let \((\sigma _\alpha )\) be a Hilbert–Schmidt orthonormal basis of \(M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\). The coordinates of \(X\in M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\) in this basis are \(\operatorname{tr}(\sigma _\alpha ^\dagger X)\); consequently \(X=0\) as soon as \(\operatorname{tr}(\sigma _\alpha ^\dagger X)=0\) for every \(\alpha \). If in addition every \(\sigma _\alpha \) is Hermitian, the coordinates are \(\operatorname{tr}(\sigma _\alpha X)\), so the basis is self-dual for the bilinear trace pairing.
For a positive-definite operator \(\tau \) on \(\mathbb {C}^{d_2}\otimes \mathbb {C}^{d_1}\), the infimum of
over \(S_{1}\in M_{d_1}(\mathbb {C})\) and \(S_{2}\in M_{d_2}(\mathbb {C})\) with \(\det S_{1}=\det S_{2}=1\) is attained. The two tensor factors may have different dimensions.
Let \(D\geq 1\) and let \(X\in \mathrm{GL}(D,\mathbb {C})\). There are a nonzero \(c\in \mathbb {C}\) and \(S\in \operatorname{SL}(D,\mathbb {C})\) such that
Moreover, \(\Phi _X\) has Kraus rank exactly one. The matrix scalar \(c\) is complex and need not be positive real; positivity applies only to the map scalar \(|c|^2\).
Suppose \(X_i=c_iS_i\), where \(c_i\neq 0\) and \(S_i\in \operatorname{SL}(d_i,\mathbb {C})\). For every linear map \(T:M_{d_1}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{d_2}(\mathbb {C})\),
A map in rectangular Kraus form sends positive semidefinite matrices to positive semidefinite matrices. Every trace-preserving completely positive Kraus map is a completely positive Kraus map.
The composition of two trace-preserving completely positive maps is again trace-preserving completely positive. If \(\mathcal{S}\) has Kraus operators \(A_i\) and \(\mathcal{T}\) has Kraus operators \(B_j\), then \(\mathcal{S}\circ \mathcal{T}\) has Kraus operators \(A_iB_j\).
This is the Jordan-block calculation in [ Wol12 , Chapter 8, proof of Equation (8.104) ] . Let \(D\ge 1\), let \(N\in M_{D}(\mathbb C)\) be the strict upper-shift matrix \(N_{i,j}=1\) iff \(j=i+1\) (and \(0\) otherwise), and \(J_{D}(\lambda )=\lambda I+N\) the associated Jordan block. Then \(N^{k}_{i,j}=1\) iff \(j=i+k\) (with \(N^{k}=0\) for \(k\ge D\)), and for every \(n\in \mathbb N\),
Let \(H\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be Hermitian and let \(A\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) satisfy \(HA=AH^{T}\) and \(A^{T}=-A\). If \(H|\psi \rangle =\lambda |\psi \rangle \), then the partner vector \(A|\overline\psi \rangle \) is again a \(\lambda \)-eigenvector of \(H\) and is orthogonal to \(|\psi \rangle \):
Let \(\rho \) be a positive semidefinite operator on \(A \otimes R\) with reduced state \(\rho _R = \operatorname{tr}_A \rho \). Then the singular reference \((\mathbb {1}_A / d_A) \otimes \rho _R\) satisfies the support condition \(\ker ((\mathbb {1}_A / d_A) \otimes \rho _R) \subseteq \ker \rho \).
For complex matrices \(A\) and \(B\) of compatible rectangular sizes,
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D'}(\mathbb {C})\) be a positive map for which \(T^*(\mathbb {1})\) is positive definite. Then there exists an invertible \(X\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) such that \(\rho \mapsto T(X\rho X^\dagger )\) is a trace-preserving positive map [ Wol12 , Chapter 3, Lemma “Making positive maps trace preserving” ] .
Let \(\tau \) be positive semidefinite on \(\mathcal H_S\), let \(X\) be a matrix on \(\mathcal H_S\), and let \(\overline\tau =\tau \otimes d_C^{-1}\mathbf1_C\). Then
Let \(V\) be finite-dimensional and let \(f:V\to V\) have bounded orbits. Then
Let \(T\) be an endomorphism of a finite-dimensional complex vector space whose every eigenvalue has modulus at most one. Then \(T^{n}(Y)\to 0\) for every \(Y\) in the non-peripheral subspace:
For positive-definite matrices \(A_1,A_2,B_1,B_2\), \(s\in (0,1)\), and \(\theta \in [0,1]\), with \(\hat{A}=A\otimes \mathbb {1}\) and \(\hat{B}=\mathbb {1}\otimes B^\top \), setting \(A_\theta =\theta A_1+(1-\theta )A_2\) and \(B_\theta =\theta B_1+(1-\theta )B_2\), the fractional product \(\hat A^s\hat B^{1-s}\) is jointly concave in the Loewner order:
For positive-definite matrices \(A\), \(B\) and \(s\in (0,1)\),
where \(A\otimes \mathbb {1}\) and \(\mathbb {1}\otimes B^\top \) are regarded as operators on the Kronecker model space \(\mathbb {C}^{D\times D}\).
Let \(T\) be a positive subunital map, let \(A\ge 0\), let \(p\in (0,1)\), and let \(t{\gt}0\). Then
Let \(T\) be a positive subunital map, let \(A\ge 0\), let \(p\in (1,2)\), and let \(t{\gt}0\). Then
The inequality is reversed relative to the concave integrand, since \(g_{p,t}\) is operator convex.
If the defect block satisfies
then the dilation is an isometry, and compressing the weighted scalar block-diagonal matrix gives \(\sum _{i\in \iota }w_iC_iC_i^\dagger +tSS^\dagger \). The defect relation can also be written as \(\sum _{i\in \iota }C_iC_i^\dagger +SS^\dagger =\mathbb {1}\). Strict positivity of all weights together with \(t{\gt}0\) implies positive definiteness of the scalar block-diagonal matrix. If all weights are nonzero and the defect scalar is nonzero, the inverse diagonal has reciprocal weights, and compressing this inverse gives \(\sum _{i\in \iota }w_i^{-1}C_iC_i^\dagger +t^{-1}SS^\dagger \).
Let \(w_i\ge 0\) and \(t{\gt}0\). If the defect block satisfies \(SS^\dagger =\mathbb {1}-\sum _{i\in \iota }C_iC_i^\dagger \), then
If the supplied dominating dilation is minimal, \(r_2=\operatorname{rank}(\tau _2)\), then \(W_2\) is surjective. Consequently a factorization \(W_1=CW_2\) determines \(C\) uniquely.
Let \(W_i:H\to R_i\) be finite-dimensional complex matrices. If
then there is a contraction \(C:R_2\to R_1\) such that \(W_1=CW_2\).
Suppose that \(T:M_{d'}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\) has the supplied representation \(T(A)=V^\dagger (A\otimes \mathbb {1}_r)V\). If \(\tau \) is the normalized Choi matrix of \(T\), then
If \(d'{\gt}0\), the assignment \(V\mapsto W\) is one-to-one. Moreover, for every \(C:\mathbb {C}^{r_2}\to \mathbb {C}^{r_1}\),
For positive-definite matrices \(X_1,X_2,Y_1,Y_2\) and \(\theta \in [0,1]\), the parallel sum \((X,Y)\mapsto X(X+Y)^{-1}Y\) is jointly concave in the Loewner order:
where \(X_\theta =\theta X_1+(1-\theta )X_2\) and \(Y_\theta =\theta Y_1+(1-\theta )Y_2\).
Let \(e_L:H_L\to H_L'\) and \(e_R:H_R\to H_R'\) be bijections, and write \(Z^{e_L\otimes e_R}\) for the corresponding simultaneous relabelling of the rows and columns of \(Z\). Then
Let \(A:H_A\to K_A\) and \(B:H_B\to K_B\) be linear maps between finite-dimensional complex spaces, and let \(X\) be an operator on \(H_A\otimes H_B\). If \(B^\dagger B=1\), then
If \(A^\dagger A=1\), then, symmetrically,
The identities include zero-dimensional spaces.
Let \(P_\tau \) be the orthogonal projector onto the support of \(\tau =\operatorname{tr}_R\sigma \). Then, for every matrix \(X\),
For square operators \(X,Y\) on \(\mathbb {C}^d\otimes \mathbb {C}^{d'}\),
Consequently, first-factor partial transpose is self-adjoint for the real trace pairing \((X,Y)\mapsto \Re \operatorname{tr}(XY)\).
Let \(E(X)=\sum _iK_iXK_i^\dagger \) be a Kraus map that is unital (\(\sum _iK_iK_i^\dagger =\mathbb {1}\)), and assume:
the adjoint Kraus map \(E^*(X)=\sum _iK_i^\dagger XK_i\) has a positive definite fixed point \(\rho {\gt}0\), and
\(E\) is irreducible.
Then \(\mathrm{peripheral}(E)\) is closed under powers: if \(\mu \in \mathrm{peripheral}(E)\), then \(\mu ^n\in \mathrm{peripheral}(E)\) for every \(n\in \mathbb {N}\).
Let \(E:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be a linear map, and assume that \(E\) has a nonzero fixed point \(\rho \neq 0\). Let \(p{\gt}0\). If every peripheral eigenvalue \(\mu \) of \(E\) satisfies \(\mu ^p=1\), then \(\mathrm{peripheral}(E^p)=\{ 1\} \).
Let \(D\geq 1\), let \(M\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be positive-definite, and let \(\lambda _{\min }(M)\) be its smallest Hermitian eigenvalue. For every \(X\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\),
Let \(A\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be Hermitian with positive part \(A^+\). There is a matrix \(\Pi \) with \(0\leq \Pi \leq \mathbb {1}\), \(\Pi ^2=\Pi \), and \(\Pi A=A^+\), namely the orthogonal projection onto the support space of \(A^+\).
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D'}(\mathbb {C})\) be a trace-preserving positive linear map and let \(H\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be Hermitian, with Jordan decompositions \(H=P_+-P_-\) and \(T(H)=Q_+-Q_-\). Then \(\operatorname{tr}[Q_+]\leq \operatorname{tr}[P_+]\).
Let \(S,T\) be positive semidefinite matrices and let \(x\) be a vector. If \((t\mathbf1+S)^{-1}x=(t\mathbf1+T)^{-1}x\) for every \(t{\gt}0\), then \(\sqrt S\, x=\sqrt T\, x\). More generally, for any fixed matrix \(Q\), if \(Q(t\mathbf1+S)^{-1}x=Q(t\mathbf1+T)^{-1}x\) for every \(t{\gt}0\), then \(Q\sqrt S\, x=Q\sqrt T\, x\).
In particular, for positive definite \(A,B\) and every \(t{\gt}0\), put \(\Delta _{A,B}=A\otimes (B^{-1})^{\mathsf T}\). The source-\(B\) left–right resolvent satisfies
and
These are the positive-square-root specializations of the passage from relative modular resolvents to analytic functions of the relative modular operator in Jenčová–Ruskai, arXiv:0903.2895v4, lines 658–680.
Positive and trace-preserving matrix endomorphisms are closed under concatenation, natural powers, and finite-dimensional pointwise limits. Positive Schwarz maps are closed under the same operations. Moreover, the trace-pairing adjoint of the identity map is the identity map, trace-pairing adjoints commute with natural powers, and pointwise convergence passes to the trace-pairing adjoints. Every assertion is orientation-specific: applying the Schwarz closure to \(T^*\) requires a Schwarz hypothesis for \(T^*\).
Let \(A\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be positive semidefinite, let \(c\in \mathbb {C}\), and let \(\psi \in \mathbb {C}^D\). If \(A\leq c|\psi \rangle \! \langle \psi |\), then there is a non-negative scalar \(a\) such that \(A=a|\psi \rangle \! \langle \psi |\).
Let \(P\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be a nonzero idempotent and let \(E\) be a linear map on \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) that preserves the corner \(PM_{D}(\mathbb {C})P\), is primitive, and fixes the corner projection, \(E(P)=P\). Then the restriction of \(E\) to the corner \(PM_{D}(\mathbb {C})P\) is again primitive.
Let \(p=(p_z)_{z\in Z}\) be a probability distribution on a finite set \(Z\). Define \(h(t)=-t\log t\) for \(t{\gt}0\) and \(h(0)=0\). Then
Let \(\omega _{XY}\) be positive semidefinite. Then
Equivalently, \(\omega _{XY}\) is supported on \(\operatorname {supp}\omega _X\otimes \operatorname {supp}\omega _Y\).
Let \(X,C\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) with \(X\geq 0\). If \(C\geq 0\), then \(\operatorname{tr}[CX]\geq 0\); if \(C\leq \mathbb {1}\), then \(\operatorname{tr}[CX]\leq \operatorname{tr}[X]\).
Let \(e \colon \iota _1 \to \iota \) be injective and let \(\{ \Psi _k\} _{k \in \iota }\) satisfy \(\Psi _{e(i)} = \psi _i\) for all \(i \in \iota _1\) and \(\Psi _k = 0\) for every \(k\) outside the image of \(e\). Then \(\sum _{k} |\Psi _k\rangle \! \langle \Psi _k| = \sum _i |\psi _i\rangle \! \langle \psi _i|\).
Let \(\{ \psi _i\} _{i \in \iota _1}\) and \(\{ \phi _j\} _{j \in \iota _2}\) be ensembles. Extend \(\psi \) by the zero vector on the second summand of \(\iota _1 \sqcup \iota _2\), and extend \(\phi \) by the zero vector on the first summand. Both extended families have the same density operator as the family they extend.
For matrices \(\rho ,\sigma \in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\),
Let \(\tau '\) be as in Lemma 1.6.12 and let \(Y=\sum _kv_kv_k^\dagger \) be any rank-one decomposition of its Riesz matrix. Then the map \(T'(B)_{ij}:=n\cdot \tau '(B\otimes |i\rangle \langle j|)\) equals \(\sum _kK_kBK_k^\dagger \) for the reshaped operators \(K_k:\mathbb {C}^m\to \mathbb {C}^n\), \(K_k:=\sqrt n\, v_k^\dagger \) (viewing \(v_k\) as an \(m\times n\) matrix). Complete positivity of \(T'\) is assembled from this identity together with the positive semidefiniteness of \(Y\) at Theorem 1.6.17.
Each reduced eigenvector density has unit trace, and for \(n\ge D'\) its Ky-Fan \(n\)-norm is that trace:
Let \(\rho \) be a density matrix on \(A \otimes R\) with reduced state \(\rho _R = \operatorname{tr}_A \rho \), and suppose the support condition \(\ker ((\mathbb {1}_A / d_A) \otimes \rho _R) \subseteq \ker \rho \) holds. Then
Let \(a,b{\gt}0\). Then the function
is integrable on \((0,\infty )\), and
This is the scalar normalization \((\mathrm{intspec})\) in Jenčová–Ruskai, arXiv:0903.2895v4, §2.1, lines 406–413.
For Hermitian matrices \(\rho ,\sigma \) on a finite index set and any bijection \(e\) from that set onto another finite set,
Let \(\tau '\) be a \(\mathbb {C}\)-linear functional on \(M_{m}(\mathbb {C})\otimes M_{n}(\mathbb {C})\) built from a \(\mathbb {R}\)-linear functional by the Hermitian-decomposition construction of Lemma 1.6.12, and suppose \(\operatorname{Re}\tau '(X)\ge 0\) for every positive semidefinite \(X\in M_{m}(\mathbb {C})\otimes M_{n}(\mathbb {C})\). Let \(Y\) be the matrix representing \(\tau '\) through the trace pairing, \(\tau '(X)=\operatorname{tr}(YX)\). Then \(Y\) is positive semidefinite.
For matrices \(M\) and \(P\), column-stacking vectorization satisfies
Let \(X\in M_{d\times k}(\mathbb {C})\) and let \(\eta \in \mathbb {C}^{d'}\otimes \mathbb {C}^k\). Then \(R_X^\dagger \eta \in \mathbb {C}^{d'}\otimes \mathbb {C}^d\) has Schmidt rank at most \(k\).
If \(\psi \in \mathbb {C}^{d'}\otimes \mathbb {C}^d\) has Schmidt rank at most \(k\), then there exist \(X\in M_{d\times k}(\mathbb {C})\) and \(\eta \in \mathbb {C}^{d'}\otimes \mathbb {C}^k\) such that \(\psi =R_X^\dagger \eta \).
Let \(\zeta \) be a primitive \(d\)-th root of unity and let \(i,j\) range over the residues modulo \(d\). Then
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D'}(\mathbb {C})\) be a positive linear map with \(\operatorname{tr}[T(\rho )] = c\, \operatorname{tr}[\rho ]\) for some nonnegative real \(c\) and all \(\rho \in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\). Then for all Hermitian \(H\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), \(\operatorname{tr}[(TH)^+]\leq c\cdot \operatorname{tr}[H^+]\). Generalizes Lemma 13.1.18 from the trace-preserving case \(c=1\).
Assume \(D',D\ge 1\). For \(n\ge 1\) the set \(E_n(\tau )\) is nonempty, and for Hermitian \(\tau \) it is bounded below by the least eigenvalue \(\nu _{\min }\) of \(\tau \); the expectation of \(\tau \) in any normalized vector of Schmidt rank at most \(n\) is one of its elements. Hence \(\inf E_n(\tau )\) exists.
Assume \(d{\gt}0\). A vector \(\psi \in \mathbb {C}^d\otimes \mathbb {C}^d\) has Schmidt rank at most \(k\) if and only if there is a matrix \(X\in M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\) of rank at most \(k\) such that \(\psi _{(i,j)}=d^{-1/2}X_{i,j}\).
For any invertible \(C \in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) and any linear map \(E\) on \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), write \(S_C(E)(X)=C^{-1}E(CXC^\dagger )(C^\dagger )^{-1}\) for the similarity transform by \(C\). The transforms by \(C\) and \(C^{-1}\) compose to the identity:
Let \(E\) be an irreducible completely positive map on \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), let \(C \in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be invertible, with \(\det C \neq 0\), and let \(c {\gt} 0\). Define the similarity-transformed map by
Then \(E'\) is also irreducible.
Let \(T:M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{d'}(\mathbb {C})\) have Choi matrix \(\tau \). Suppose \(P\in M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\) and \(X\in M_{d\times k}(\mathbb {C})\) satisfy \(PX=X\). If \(R_P\tau R_P^\dagger \ge 0\), then the rectangular right compression of \(\tau \) by \(X\) is positive semidefinite.
Let \(S\) be a \(*\)-subalgebra of \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), let \(W\subseteq \mathbb {C}^D\) be irreducible under \(S\), and let \(f\) be an intertwiner from \(W\) into a subspace \(W'\). Then there exists a real number \(c\geq 0\) such that, for all \(x,y\in W\),
Let \(S\) be a \(*\)-subalgebra of \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), let \(W,W'\subseteq \mathbb {C}^D\) be irreducible under \(S\), and let \(f:\mathbb {C}^D\to \mathbb {C}^D\) be linear. Suppose that \(f(W)\subseteq W'\) and \(f(Ax)=A(fx)\) for every \(A\in S\) and \(x\in W\). Then either \(f\) is zero on \(W\), or \(f\) is injective on \(W\) and maps \(W\) onto \(W'\).
Let \(S\) be a \(*\)-subalgebra of \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) acting on \(\mathbb {C}^D\). A complex subspace \(W\subseteq \mathbb {C}^D\) is invariant under every member of \(S\) if and only if it is the underlying complex subspace of a submodule of \(\mathbb {C}^D\) over \(S\). Under this identification, an invariant subspace is irreducible under \(S\) precisely when it is a simple \(S\)-module.
Let \(S\) be a \(*\)-subalgebra of \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), and let \(\mathcal D_1,\mathcal D_2\) be sets of subspaces irreducible under \(S\). If no piece of \(\mathcal D_1\) is of the same type as any piece of \(\mathcal D_2\), then
Let \(S\) be a \(*\)-subalgebra of \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), and let \(W\subseteq \mathbb {C}^D\) be invariant under every member of \(S\). Then \(W\) is the sum of a finite family of pairwise orthogonal subspaces contained in \(W\), each irreducible under \(S\).
Let \(S\) be a \(*\)-subalgebra of \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), and let \(W\subseteq \mathbb {C}^D\) be invariant under every member of \(S\). Then \(W^\perp \) is also invariant under every member of \(S\): \(AW^\perp \subseteq W^\perp \) for every \(A\in S\).
Let \(S\) be a \(*\)-subalgebra of \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), let \(W\subseteq \mathbb {C}^D\) be invariant under \(S\), and let \(P\) be the orthogonal projection onto \(W\). Then \(P(Ax)=A(Px)\) for every \(A\in S\) and \(x\in \mathbb {C}^D\).
Let \(S\) be a \(*\)-subalgebra of \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), and let \(W,W'\subseteq \mathbb {C}^D\) be irreducible under \(S\). Then \(W\) and \(W'\) are of the same type if and only if there is an intertwiner from \(W\) into \(W'\) that is injective on \(W\) and maps \(W\) onto \(W'\).
Let \(S\) be a \(*\)-subalgebra of \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), and let \(W,W'\subseteq \mathbb {C}^D\) be irreducible under \(S\). If \(W\) is of the same type as \(W'\), then there is an intertwiner \(u\) from \(W\) into \(W'\) that maps \(W\) onto \(W'\) and satisfies \(\langle u(x),u(y)\rangle =\langle x,y\rangle \) for all \(x,y\in W\).
Let \(S\) be a \(*\)-subalgebra of \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), let \(\mathcal D\) be a family of subspaces irreducible under \(S\), and let \(W\) be irreducible under \(S\), with \(W\leq \bigvee _{W'\in \mathcal D}W'\). Then \(W\) is of the same type as some piece of \(\mathcal D\).
Let \(S\) be a \(*\)-subalgebra of \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), and let \(W,W',W''\subseteq \mathbb {C}^D\) be irreducible under \(S\). If \(W\) is of the same type as \(W'\) and \(W'\) is of the same type as \(W''\), then \(W\) is of the same type as \(W''\).
Let \(S\) be a \(*\)-subalgebra of \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), let \(W\subseteq \mathbb {C}^D\) be irreducible under \(S\), and let \(f:\mathbb {C}^D\to \mathbb {C}^D\) be linear. Suppose that \(f(W)\subseteq W\) and \(f(Ax)=A(fx)\) for every \(A\in S\) and \(x\in W\). Then there is \(c\in \mathbb {C}\) such that \(fx=cx\) for every \(x\in W\).
Let \((f_{k,i,j})_{k{\lt}K,\, i{\lt}m_k,\, j{\lt}d_k}\) be an orthonormal basis of \(\mathbb {C}^D\). There are an identification of the index set of triples \((k,i,j)\) with \(\{ 0,\ldots ,D-1\} \), realizing \(\sum _kd_km_k=D\), and a unitary \(U\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) whose columns are the basis vectors, such that every matrix \(A\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) acting on the basis by
for matrices \(B_k\in M_{d_k}(\mathbb {C})\) satisfies
Let \(K:\{ 0,\ldots ,r-1\} \to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) and \(L:\{ 0,\ldots ,s-1\} \to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be two Kraus families. Write \(K\mathbin {+\! +}L\) for their concatenation as a family indexed by \(\{ 0,\ldots ,r+s-1\} \). Then
Let \(T:M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{d'}(\mathbb {C})\) be a linear map with Choi matrix \(\tau \) and dual \(T^*\). If for some ancilla dimension \(r\) there is a \(V:\mathbb {C}^{d}\to \mathbb {C}^{d'}\otimes \mathbb {C}^{r}\) such that (27) holds for all \(A\in M_{d'}(\mathbb {C})\), then \(\operatorname{rank}(\tau )\le r\). Together with Theorem 3.10.13, the least admissible ancilla dimension is \(\operatorname{rank}(\tau )\), and dilations with \(r=\operatorname{rank}(\tau )\) are minimal. This is the discussion following [ Wol12 , Theorem 2.2 ] .
Let \(A\), \(B\) be positive semidefinite operators on the same space with \(\ker (A)\subseteq \ker (B)\), and let \(c{\gt}0\). Then
where the inverse is taken on the range of \(A\).
Fix \(t{\gt}0\) and positive-definite matrices with \(A_1\le A_2\) and \(B_1\le B_2\). The resolvent of the Kronecker model \(A\otimes \mathbb {1}+t\, (\mathbb {1}\otimes B^\top )\) of the commuting left- and right-multiplication superoperators is antitone:
For \(t{\gt}0\), positive-definite \(A_1,A_2,B_1,B_2\), and \(\theta \in [0,1]\), with \(\hat{A}=A\otimes \mathbb {1}\) and \(\hat{B}=\mathbb {1}\otimes B^\top \), setting \(A_\theta =\theta A_1+(1-\theta )A_2\) and \(B_\theta =\theta B_1+(1-\theta )B_2\):
If \(P_\tau \) is the orthogonal projector onto the support of a positive semidefinite matrix \(\tau \), then
Let \(\tau \) be positive semidefinite and let \(c{\gt}0\). Then
For every finite-dimensional auxiliary space \(\mathcal H_R\),
The corresponding identity for an auxiliary left factor is
Consequently, for \(d_R{\gt}0\),
If \(P_\tau \) is the orthogonal projector onto the support of a positive semidefinite matrix \(\tau \), then
Let \(A,B\) be positive semidefinite, let \(t{\gt}0\), set \(B^+=(B^{-1/2}_{\mathrm{supp}})^2\), and let \(P_B\) be the support projection of \(B\). Then
Let \(A\) and \(B\) be positive semidefinite, and write \(B^+=(B^{-1/2}_{\mathrm{supp}})^2\). Then
Let \(A,B,C,D\) be positive semidefinite matrices. Write \(B^+=(B^{-1/2}_{\mathrm{supp}})^2\) and \(D^+=(D^{-1/2}_{\mathrm{supp}})^2\), and let \(P_B\) be the orthogonal projection onto \((\ker B)^\perp \). If, for every \(t{\gt}0\),
where the inverses act as relative-modular superoperators on matrices, then
This is the square-root specialization of the support functional-calculus passage in Jenčová–Ruskai, arXiv:0903.2895v4, lines 788–793. The projection \(P_B\) is essential: the source gives the common generalized resolvents only after restriction to \((\ker B)^\perp \). Deriving this restricted equality requires the preceding singular equality argument and its kernel hypotheses; these are supplied for finite families by Theorem 13.6.35.
Let \(I\) be a finite nonempty set. For each \(i\in I\), let \(S_i\) be a positive-semidefinite matrix, let \(P_i\) be its support projection, and let \(b_i\) lie in its support. Write
Assume also that \(b\) lies in the support of \(S\), and put \(x=Gb\). Then
In particular,
Jenčová and Ruskai give the positive-definite residual expansion in equations \((\mathrm{Mj})\) and \((\mathrm{eq:Schz1})\) of the Appendix to arXiv:0903.2895v4. The support assumptions make the same expansion valid for the generalized inverses of the \(S_i\) and of \(S\).
Let \(I\) be a finite nonempty set. For each \(i\in I\), let \(A_i\) and \(B_i\) be positive-semidefinite matrices of the same size. For \(t{\gt}0\), write
Then
No kernel inclusion between \(A_i\) and \(B_i\) is required. This lemma is a positive-semidefinite support-domain extension of the positive-definite calculation in equations \((\mathrm{Mj})\), \((\mathrm{eq:Schz1})\), and \((\mathrm{eq:Schwzt})\) at lines 1313–1343 of Jenčová–Ruskai, arXiv:0903.2895v4; their generalized-inverse notation is given at lines 254–262. The paper does not state this extension. Its later singular equality theorem at lines 761–785 assumes \(\ker B_i\subseteq \ker A_i\) and is not asserted here. The subsequent singular entropy-equality passage is recorded in the TNLean paper-gap note [ con26p ] .
There is a \(\mathbb {C}\)-linear functional \(\tau '\) on \(M_{m}(\mathbb {C})\otimes M_{n}(\mathbb {C})\) agreeing with \(\tau \) on \(S\otimes M_{n}(\mathbb {C})\) and satisfying \(\operatorname{Re}\tau '(A)\le \| A\| _\infty \, \operatorname{Re}\tau '(\mathbb 1)\) for every Hermitian \(A\in M_{m}(\mathbb {C})\otimes M_{n}(\mathbb {C})\).
Let \(\varphi :M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\to \mathbb {C}\) be a \(\mathbb {C}\)-linear functional satisfying \(\operatorname{Re}\varphi (A)\le \| A\| _\infty \, \operatorname{Re}\varphi (\mathbb 1)\) for every Hermitian \(A\in M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\), with \(\operatorname{Re}\varphi (\mathbb 1)\ge 0\). Then \(\operatorname{Re}\varphi (A)\ge 0\) for every positive semidefinite \(A\in M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\).
If \(T(X)=\sum _j K_j X K_j^\dagger \) then \(T^*(X)=\sum _j K_j^\dagger X K_j\): the Kraus operators of \(T\) and of \(T^*\) differ by Hermitian conjugation, as in [ Wol12 , Section 2.2, after Proposition 2.4 ] . Such a \(T\) satisfies \(T(X^\dagger )=T(X)^\dagger \), and so does every completely positive map.
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be positive and trace preserving, let \(\rho \succeq 0\) satisfy \(T(\rho )=\rho \), and let \(V:\mathcal H\to \mathbb {C}^D\) be an isometry onto the support of \(\rho \). Define \(\widetilde T(Y)=V^*T(VYV^*)V\). If \(T^*(A)=A\), then
This is Equation (6.53) of [ Wol12 ] .
For a positive-semidefinite \(D \times D\) matrix \(M\),
and equality holds if and only if \(M=(\operatorname{tr}M/D)\mathbb {1}\). The inequality holds for a positive-semidefinite matrix whose rows and columns are indexed by any finite set with \(D\) elements; the equality characterization is stated only for \(D \times D\) matrices.
For any linear endomorphism \(T\) on \(M_{D_1\times D_2}(\mathbb {C})\), the operator trace expands as
where \(E_{pq}\in M_{D_1\times D_2}(\mathbb {C})\) has entry \(1\) in position \((p,q)\) and zero elsewhere.
If \(\rho _{ABC}\) is Hermitian, then \(\operatorname{tr}_A(\rho _{ABC})\), \(\operatorname{tr}_C(\rho _{ABC})\), and \(\operatorname{tr}_{AC}(\rho _{ABC})\) are all Hermitian. The same holds for bipartite partial traces \(\operatorname{tr}_A(\rho _{AB})\) and \(\operatorname{tr}_B(\rho _{AB})\).
Let \(T_\varphi :=T\circ T_\phi =T_\phi \circ T\) be Wolf’s asymptotic dynamics. For every matrix \(\rho \), every \(n\geq 0\), and every \(n{\gt}0\) in the second equality,
These are the numerator identities used in [ Wol12 , Chapter 8, Eq. (8.114) ] . They follow from \(T_\phi T=TT_\phi =T_\varphi =T_\varphi T_\phi \); the positive-iterate condition records that the zeroth power of \(T_\varphi \) is the identity.
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D'}(\mathbb {C})\) be a complex-linear map. Then
The left supremum is over distinct density matrices in \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), and the right supremum is over orthogonal unit vectors in \(\mathbb {C}^D\). No positivity or trace-preservation assumption is imposed on \(T\). This is [ Wol12 , Chapter 8, Lemma 8.3, Eq. (8.81) ] .
Let \(S:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D'}(\mathbb {C})\) be complex-linear and let \(\rho _1\neq \rho _2\) be density matrices. Then
This is the pointwise inequality from Wolf Lemma 8.3 used in Equation (8.115).
For every \(A\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), the trace norm is the sum of the square roots of the eigenvalues of the positive operator \(A^\dagger A\):
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D'}(\mathbb {C})\) be a linear map and let \(X\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) satisfy \(X^\dagger T^*(\mathbb {1})X=\mathbb {1}\). Then, for every \(\rho \in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\),
Let \(T:M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\) satisfy \(T(X^\dagger )=T(X)^\dagger \). Then in any family \((\sigma _\alpha )\) used on both sides,
and the same identity holds for the transfer matrix taken in the matrix units. This is the Hermitian-map case of the sentence following [ Wol12 , Equation (2.20) ] .
Let \(T:M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\) satisfy \(T(X^\dagger )=T(X)^\dagger \) and let \((\sigma _\alpha )\) be a Hilbert–Schmidt orthonormal basis of \(M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\) used on both sides. Then
Fix a dimension \(d_C\ge 1\) and a primitive \(d_C\)-th root of unity \(\zeta \). For every matrix \(M\) on \(\mathcal{H}_S\otimes \mathbb {C}^{d_C}\), the uniform average of the conjugations by the \(d_C^2\) unitaries \(\mathbb {1}_S\otimes W(a,b)\) on the second factor is the partial trace over that factor tensored with the maximally mixed state \(\mathbb {1}_C/d_C\):
If \(C\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) is nonzero, then
This is the matrix-factorization input used in [ PGVWC07 , Lemma 3 ] .
Let \(E:M_{D_{\rm in}}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D_{\rm out}}(\mathbb {C})\) be a \(2\)-positive complex-linear map. For every \(A,B\in M_{D_{\rm in}}(\mathbb {C})\) and all \(v,w\in \mathbb C^{D_{\rm out}}\) such that \(E(B^\dagger B)\, w = E(B^\dagger A)\, v\), we have
This is the pseudoinverse-free form of [ Wol12 , Eq. (5.4) ] : the usual statement \(E(A^\dagger B)\, E(B^\dagger B)^{-1}E(B^\dagger A)\le E(A^\dagger A)\) (with inverse taken on the range) follows by taking \(w = E(B^\dagger B)^{+}E(B^\dagger A)\, v\).
Let \(s\) be a finite set of complex numbers of modulus one and let \(\lambda \in s\). Then
Let \(\rho \geq 0\) act on a finite-dimensional Hilbert space, and let \(C:\mathbb {C}^r\to \mathcal H\) satisfy \(CC^\dagger =\rho \). If \(\rho =\sum _{i=0}^{n-1}\sigma _i\), where \(n\geq 1\) and every \(\sigma _i\geq 0\), then there is a POVM \(\{ P_i\} _{i=0}^{n-1}\) on \(\mathbb {C}^r\) such that
for every \(i\).
Let \(I\) be a finite nonempty set. For each \(i\in I\), let \(A_i\) and \(B_i\) be positive-semidefinite matrices of the same size satisfying \(\ker B_i\subseteq \ker A_i\). For \(t{\gt}0\), write
Then
The kernel inclusions for the summands imply \(\ker (\sum _i B_i)\subseteq \ker (\sum _i A_i)\). This lemma is the source-\(A\) support-domain extension of the positive-definite residual calculation in equations \((\mathrm{Mj})\), \((\mathrm{eq:Schz1})\), and \((\mathrm{eq:Schwzt})\) at lines 1313–1343 of Jenčová–Ruskai, arXiv:0903.2895v4. The paper does not state this fixed-parameter extension separately. The lemma does not assert that equality of relative entropies makes the defect vanish.
Let \(X\) be a matrix on \(\mathcal H_S\otimes \mathbb C^{d_C}\) and let \(U_g=\mathbf1\otimes W_g\) for the \(d_C^2\) Weyl indices. Then
Let \(T\) be an endomorphism of a complex normed space and let \(s\) be a finite set of complex numbers of modulus one.
On the span of the eigenspaces of \(T\) belonging to the elements of \(s\), the means \(C_{N}(T,s)\) converge to the identity.
At a vector \(X\) with \(T^{n}(X)\to 0\), the means \(C_{N}(T,s)(X)\) converge to zero.
Single-Kraus maps satisfy \(\mathcal K_V\circ \mathcal K_W=\mathcal K_{VW}\). Trace adjoints reverse composition, and the trace adjoint of \(X\mapsto VXV^\dagger \) is \(Y\mapsto V^\dagger YV\). Frobenius vectorization transports both linear equivalences and conjugation by such equivalences.
If \(AB=BA=I\) and \(X=AJB\), then for every \(n\in \mathbb N\),
Let \(T\) be a complex finite-dimensional endomorphism, let \(T_\phi \) be its peripheral spectral projection, and let \(T_\varphi =T T_\phi \) be the phase-weighted peripheral map of Equation (6.13). For every positive integer \(n\),
The restriction \(n{\gt}0\) is essential: at \(n=0\) the first left-hand side is zero, whereas the right-hand side is the identity. In particular, the later condition \(d^2-1\leq n\) does not exclude this failure when \(d=1\).
Suppose that \(N\ge 1\) and \(m{\lt}s\). If \(f_{N,m,s}(y)\le B\) for every strictly positive vector \(y\), then the same inequality holds for every nonnegative vector when a literal \(0/0\) summand is assigned Lean’s totalized value zero. In particular, the conclusion holds with \(B=N/s\) once the strictly positive inequality has been proved.
Suppose that \(m{\lt}N\), \(m{\lt}s\), and \(N\le s\). Let strictly positive vectors \(x^{(r)}\) converge coordinatewise to a nonzero nonnegative vector \(a\) with at least one vanishing forward denominator. Then
- Yamagami.limsup_sum_le_card_mul_of_tendsto_zero_on
- Yamagami.tendsto_forwardDenominator
- Yamagami.tendsto_summand_of_denominator_ne
- Yamagami.tendsto_summand_zero_of_mem_preceding
- Yamagami.summand_nonneg_and_le
- Yamagami.limsup_functional_le_sub_ratio_of_singularRun
- Yamagami.limsup_functional_le_sub_ratio_of_singularDenominator
- Yamagami.sub_ratio_le_card_ratio
- Yamagami.limsup_functional_le_card_ratio_of_singularRun
- Yamagami.limsup_functional_le_card_ratio_of_singularDenominator
Suppose that \(N\ge 1\) and \(m{\lt}s\). Let \(a\colon \mathbb {Z}/N\mathbb {Z}\to \mathbb {R}\) be nonnegative and nonzero. If one forward denominator vanishes, there is an index \(j\) such that
If \(m{\lt}N\), the \(m\) indices \(j-1,\ldots ,j-m\) are distinct. Each has zero numerator, and its forward denominator contains the positive coordinate \(a_j\).
- Yamagami.precedingIndices
- Yamagami.HasSingularRun
- Yamagami.exists_hasSingularRun_of_zero_window
- Yamagami.card_precedingIndices
- Yamagami.precedingIndices_zero_and_reaches
- Yamagami.forwardDenominator_pos_of_mem_preceding
- Yamagami.eq_zero_of_forwardDenominator_eq_zero
- Yamagami.forwardDenominator_eq_zero_iff
- Yamagami.exists_hasSingularRun_of_forwardDenominator_eq_zero
Let \(d\geq 1\) and let \(T:M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{d'}(\mathbb {C})\) be a quantum channel. Suppose a normalized vector \(\varphi \in \mathbb {C}^{d'}\otimes \mathbb {C}^{d'}\) and a unitary identification
are supplied, so both sides have dimension \(d(d')^2\), and suppose that the system-plus-environment representation from Equation (2.14) holds:
If \(n\geq 1\) and \(T=\sum _{i=0}^{n-1}T_i\) is a decomposition into completely positive maps \(T_i:M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{d'}(\mathbb {C})\), then there is a POVM \(\{ P_i\} _{i=0}^{n-1}\subset M_{dd'}(\mathbb {C})\) such that
for every \(i\) and \(\rho \). Moreover, the Kraus rank \(k_i\) of \(T_i\) satisfies \(k_i\leq \operatorname{rank}(P_i)\). This is [ Wol12 , Proposition (Environment induced instruments), Equation (2.15) ] .
If \(E\) satisfies the Schwarz inequality, then
Consequently, \(A\in \mathcal{A}(E)\) exactly when both equalities hold. This is [ Wol12 , Equations (5.13)–(5.14) ] .
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be positive and trace preserving, suppose that \(T^*\) satisfies the Schwarz inequality, and let \(\rho \succeq 0\) satisfy \(T(\rho )=\rho \). With \(Q=\operatorname{supp}(\rho )\), the set
is a \(*\)-subalgebra of the corner algebra \(QM_{D}(\mathbb {C})Q\). No invertibility of \(\rho \) on the ambient space is assumed.
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) have bounded orbits, let \(P_T\) be its mean-ergodic projection, and let \(P_T^*\) be the trace-pairing adjoint of \(P_T\). Then
and \(P_T^*(Y)=Y\) if and only if \(T^*(Y)=Y\).
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be positive and trace preserving, suppose that \(T^*\) satisfies the Schwarz inequality, and suppose that there is a positive definite matrix \(\rho \) satisfying \(T(\rho )=\rho \). Let \(P_T\) be the mean-ergodic projection of \(T\). There are positive integers \(d_k,m_k\), a unitary \(U\), and density matrices \(\sigma _k\in M_{m_k}(\mathbb {C})\) such that
for every \(A\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\). This is the full-support conditional-expectation step in the proof of [ Wol12 , Theorem 6.14 ] .
Let \(E\) be a trace-preserving Kraus map on \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) with a positive definite fixed point \(\rho {\gt}0\), \(E(\rho )=\rho \). There are \(n\in \mathbb {N}\), positive dimensions \(d_0,\ldots ,d_{n-1}\) and multiplicities \(m_0,\ldots ,m_{n-1}\) with \(\sum _kd_km_k=D\), realized by an explicit identification of the index sets, and a unitary \(U\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) such that a matrix \(X\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) satisfies \(E^*(X)=X\) exactly when
for some matrices \(B_k\in M_{d_k}(\mathbb {C})\); that is, up to reordering the two tensor factors of each block,
The positive definite fixed point removes the zero block: this is the unital case of the block representation in Equation (1.39) of [ Wol12 ] , invoked by [ Wol12 , Theorem 6.14 ] . The general form of [ Wol12 , Theorem 6.14 ] , with a zero block and density weights \(\rho _k\) on the Schrödinger-picture fixed points, is not asserted here.
Under the hypotheses of Theorem 10.2.10, the adjoint fixed-point \(*\)-subalgebra equals the Kraus commutant:
This is [ Wol12 , Theorem 6.13 ] .
There exist integers \(n\), block sizes \(d_1,\ldots ,d_n\geq 1\), multiplicities \(m_1,\ldots ,m_n\geq 1\), and a \(\mathbb {C}\)-algebra isomorphism from the adjoint-fixed-point \(*\)-subalgebra to \(\prod _{k=1}^{n}M_{d_k}(\mathbb {C})\) such that \(\sum _{k=1}^{n}d_km_k\leq D\).
If the Kraus map is trace-preserving and has a positive definite fixed point \(\rho {\gt}0\) with \(E(\rho )=\rho \), then \(\operatorname{Fix}(E^*)\) is a \(*\)-subalgebra of \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\).
Let \(L\) be a GKSL generator in Lindblad form with Hamiltonian \(H\) and Lindblad operators \(\{ L_j\} \). Define the adjoint generator \(L^*\) by (25). If \(L\) has a faithful stationary state \(\rho _0{\gt}0\) with \(L(\rho _0)=0\), then, for any \(A\), the condition \(L^*(A)=0\) implies, for every \(j\),
That is, \(\ker (L^*)\subseteq \{ H,L_j,L_j^\dagger \} '\). This is [ Wol12 , Theorem 7.2 ] .
Under the same hypotheses as Theorem 12.6.8,
That is, the adjoint kernel equals the commutant of \(\{ H,L_j,L_j^\dagger \} \). This is [ Wol12 , Theorem 7.2 ] .
The set of doubly stochastic matrices in \(M_d(\mathbb {R})\) is the convex hull of the \(d\times d\) permutation matrices, and its extreme points are exactly the permutation matrices. See [ Wol12 , Chapter 8, Theorem 8.6 ] . This statement concerns only doubly stochastic matrices; the corresponding assertion of Theorem 8.6 for doubly substochastic matrices is not included here.
If the Lindblad data of a GKSL generator are block-upper-triangular with respect to some nontrivial projector \(P\), then there exists a density matrix \(\rho _0\) with nontrivial kernel satisfying \(L(\rho _0)=0\). This is [ Wol12 , Proposition 7.6, (4)\(\Rightarrow \)(2) ] .
Suppose \(D{\gt}2\). It is false that the Breuer–Hall map is indecomposable for every antisymmetric contraction \(U\). Indeed, \(U=0\) satisfies \(U^{\mathsf T}=-U\) and \(U^{\dagger }U\le \mathbb {1}\), but its Breuer–Hall map is
which is completely copositive and decomposable.
Suppose \(D{\gt}2\) and \(U\) is an antisymmetric unitary on \(\mathbb {C}^{D}\), \(U^{\mathsf T}=-U\) and \(U^{\dagger }U=\mathbb {1}\). Then the Breuer–Hall map \(T_{\mathrm{BH}}\) is an indecomposable positive map.
Let \(T\) be a continuous map from a nonempty, compact, convex set \(S\subset \mathbb {R}^n\) into itself. Then there is an \(x\in S\) such that \(T(x)=x\).
This is [ Wol12 , Theorem 6.10 ] , including the case \(n=0\).
- brouwer_fixedPoint_compactConvex
- fixedPoint_of_compact_convex
- CompactConvex.metricProjection
- CompactConvex.metricProjection_mem
- CompactConvex.metricProjection_isMinOn
- CompactConvex.nearest_inner_nonpos
- CompactConvex.metricProjection_norm_sub_le
- CompactConvex.metricProjection_lipschitzWith
- CompactConvex.continuous_metricProjection
- CompactConvex.metricProjection_eq_self
Let \(K\) be a compact subset of a finite-dimensional real normed space \(E\). If there is a continuous retraction \(r\colon E\to K\), then every continuous map from \(K\) to itself has a fixed point.
For every sign \(\varepsilon \) and every real Jordan block,
The real Jordan chain for a non-real conjugate pair satisfies the analogous identity with its unsigned \(2m\)-dimensional reversal metric.
If \(L\) is CCP and \(P = \mathbb {1}- |\Omega \rangle \! \langle \Omega |\), then
This is [ Wol12 , Proposition 7.2 ] .
Let \(A\in M_{k}(\mathbb {C})\) be Hermitian, let \(V:\mathbb {C}^k\to \mathbb {C}^D\) satisfy \(V^\dagger V=\mathbb {1}_k\), and let \(f:\mathbb {R}\to \mathbb {R}\) satisfy \(f(0)=0\). Then
where both sides use the continuous functional calculus on the respective finite spectra.
If \(A\in M_{n}(\mathbb {C})\) is Hermitian and \(f:\mathbb {R}\to \mathbb {R}\), then
In particular,
If \(A\) is positive semidefinite, then for every \(r\in \mathbb {R}\),
These identities include singular matrices and matrices whose index set is empty. They are project-derived rather than statements of CPSV16.
Let \(E\) be an irreducible quantum channel on \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) with \(D {\gt} 0\), and let \(\rho \) be any density matrix. Then the Cesàro means (1) converge to the unique positive definite density-matrix fixed point of \(E\). This is the Cesàro-convergence conclusion in the forward direction of [ Wol12 , Corollary 6.3 ] , specialized to quantum channels.
Let \(E\) be an irreducible quantum channel on \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) with \(D {\gt} 0\). Then there exists a unique density matrix \(\sigma \) such that \(E(\sigma ) = \sigma \). The fixed point \(\sigma \) is positive definite. This is the fixed-point conclusion in the forward direction of [ Wol12 , Corollary 6.3 ] , specialized to completely positive trace-preserving maps.
If \(T(\rho )=U\rho U^\dagger \) is a unitary channel, then \(\det T=1\) and hence \(|\det T|=1\).
Let \(d\geq 1\) and let \(T:M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{d'}(\mathbb {C})\) be completely positive and trace-preserving. Then \(d'\geq 1\), and there are a normalized vector \(\varphi \in \mathbb {C}^{d'}\otimes \mathbb {C}^{d'}\) and a unitary \(U\) on \(\mathbb {C}^d\otimes \mathbb {C}^{d'}\otimes \mathbb {C}^{d'}\), a space of total dimension \(d(d')^2\), such that, for every \(\rho \in M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\),
Here the partial trace is over the first two tensor factors \(\mathbb {C}^d\otimes \mathbb {C}^{d'}\) and retains the final factor \(\mathbb {C}^{d'}\). This is [ Wol12 , Theorem 2.5, Equation (2.14) ] .
Every quantum channel \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) admits a Stinespring isometry \(V\) on an ancilla space \(\mathbb {C}^r\) such that
For \(D\geq 1\), every quantum channel \(T\) on \(\mathbb {C}^D\) admits an environment dimension \(r\geq 1\) and a unitary \(U\) on \(\mathbb {C}^D\otimes \mathbb {C}^r\) such that, for every matrix \(\rho \) on \(\mathbb {C}^D\),
Let \(\Phi \) be completely positive and trace preserving, let \(\sigma {\gt}0\), set \(\tau =\Phi (\sigma )\), and let \(P\) be the support projection of \(\tau \). Then every matrix \(X\) satisfies \(P\Phi (X)=\Phi (X)=\Phi (X)P\). If \(VV^\dagger =P\), then \(\Psi (X)=V^\dagger \Phi (X)V\) is completely positive and trace preserving.
Let \(K\) be a finite matrix family on \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) with Kraus map \(\mathcal{E}_K\). Assume that \(\mathcal{E}_K\) is irreducible, that \(K\) is unital and trace-preserving, and that the adjoint Kraus map fixes a positive-definite matrix. Let \(\gamma \) be a primitive \(m\)-th root of unity such that the peripheral eigenvalues are exactly \(\{ \gamma ^k:k\in \{ 0,\ldots ,m{-}1\} \} \). Then \(m\mid D\).
Let \(T_1,T_2:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be positive and trace-preserving. Then
For arbitrary linear maps, the equality \(|\det (T_1T_2)|=|\det T_1|\) holds exactly when
This is the multiplicative and determinant-bound part of the monotonicity corollary following [ Wol12 , Theorem 6.1 ] .
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be a linear map and \(\tau \) the corresponding Choi–Jamiołkowski operator. Then
No positivity, trace preservation or unitality is assumed. This is [ Wol12 , Eq. (6.27) ] .
Let \(D{\gt}0\) and let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be positive and trace-preserving. Then
This is [ Wol12 , Theorem 6.1(2) ] .
- ChannelDeterminant.Internal.channel_all_eigenvalues_norm_one_of_positive_tracePreserving
- ChannelDeterminant.Internal.channel_all_eigenvalues_norm_one
- Module.End.peripheralSubspace_eq_top_of_all_eigenvalues_norm_one
- Module.End.peripheralProjection_eq_one_of_all_eigenvalues_norm_one
- ChannelDeterminant.Internal.mapsPSDConeOnto_of_channelDet_norm_eq_one
- ChannelDeterminant.Internal.exists_unitary_or_transpose_of_channelDet_norm_eq_one
- ChannelDeterminant.Internal.channelDet_transpose_norm_eq_one
- ChannelDeterminant.Internal.channelDet_norm_eq_one_of_unitaryChannel_comp_transpose
- ChannelDeterminant.Internal.channelDet_norm_eq_one_iff_exists_unitary_or_transpose_of_positive_tracePreserving
For a CPTP map \(T : M_{D}(\mathbb {C}) \to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\),
This is the CPTP specialization of [ Wol12 , Theorem 6.1(2) ] ; complete positivity excludes the genuinely transpose-type branch.
For any positive trace-preserving map \(T : M_{D}(\mathbb {C}) \to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), \(\det T\) is real and belongs to \([-1,1]\); in particular, \(|\det T|\leq 1\). This is [ Wol12 , Theorem 6.1(1) ] .
- channelDet_norm_le_one_of_positive_tracePreserving
- channelDet_norm_le_one_of_channel
- ChannelDeterminant.Internal.channelDet_star_eq_of_map_conjTranspose
- ChannelDeterminant.Internal.channelDet_star_eq_of_isPositiveMap
- ChannelDeterminant.Internal.exists_real_channelDet_mem_Icc_of_positive_tracePreserving
Ordinary transposition on \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) satisfies
Consequently it has determinant \(-1\) exactly when \(\lfloor D/2\rfloor \) is odd. For a positive trace-preserving \(T\) in positive dimension, \(\det T=-1\) exactly when that parity condition holds and \(T(A)=UA^{\mathsf T}U^\dagger \) for a unitary \(U\). In those odd-parity dimensions, \(\det T=1\) exactly for unitary conjugations. This is [ Wol12 , Theorem 6.1(3) ] .
- ChannelDeterminant.Internal.matrixBasisTransposePerm
- ChannelDeterminant.Internal.matrixBasisTransposePerm_apply
- ChannelDeterminant.Internal.channelMatrix_transposeLinearMapComplex
- ChannelDeterminant.Internal.channelDet_transposeLinearMapComplex
- ChannelDeterminant.Internal.odd_mul_pred_div_two_iff_odd_div_two
- ChannelDeterminant.Internal.channelDet_transposeLinearMapComplex_eq_neg_one_iff
- ChannelDeterminant.Internal.channelDet_eq_neg_one_iff_exists_unitary_transpose_of_positive_tracePreserving
- ChannelDeterminant.Internal.channelDet_eq_one_iff_exists_unitary_of_positive_tracePreserving_of_odd
There are no projective rays when \(d=0\). When \(d=1\), every pure-state matrix is the identity and
If \(d\geq 2\), then
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D'}(\mathbb {C})\) be a trace-preserving, Hermiticity-preserving linear map and \(Y\in M_{D'}(\mathbb {C})\) Hermitian with \(\operatorname{tr}[Y]=1\). For \(\varepsilon \geq 0\), if the rectangular Choi matrix \(\tau (T)\) satisfies
then for all density operators \(\rho _1,\rho _2\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\),
See [ Wol12 , Chapter 8, Eq. (8.86) ] .
Let \(D\geq 1\) and let \(T(X)=\sum _{i=0}^{r-1}K_iXK_i^\dagger \). Define the vector \(v_i\) by \((v_i)_{(a,b)}=D^{-1/2}K_i(a,b)\), without transposing the matrix indices. Then
If \(L\) is Hermiticity-preserving and \(P((L\otimes \operatorname{id})(|\Omega \rangle \! \langle \Omega |))P \ge 0\), where \(P = \mathbb {1}- |\Omega \rangle \! \langle \Omega |\), then \(L\) is CCP. This is [ Wol12 , Proposition 7.2 ] .
The map \(T\) is completely positive, in the sense that it admits a Kraus representation \(T(X)=\sum _{j}K_jXK_j^\dagger \) with \(K_j\in M_{d'\times d}(\mathbb {C})\), if and only if \(\tau \geq 0\). This is the complete-positivity clause of [ Wol12 , Proposition 2.1 ] .
Every linear map \(T:M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{d'}(\mathbb {C})\) is a complex linear combination of four completely positive maps. If \(T\) is Hermitian, that is \(T(B^\dagger )=T(B)^\dagger \) for every \(B\in M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\), then \(T\) is a real linear combination of two of them. This is [ Wol12 , Proposition 2.2 ] .
The conditions \(T(\mathbb {1}_d)\propto \mathbb {1}_{d'}\) and \(T^*(\mathbb {1}_{d'})\propto \mathbb {1}_d\) hold if and only if \(\operatorname{tr}_B(\tau )\propto \mathbb {1}_{d'}\) and \(\operatorname{tr}_A(\tau )\propto \mathbb {1}_d\). This is the doubly-stochastic clause of [ Wol12 , Proposition 2.1 ] .
The assignments \(T\mapsto \tau \) and \(\tau \mapsto T\), the latter defined entrywise by
are mutual inverses: every linear map is recovered from its Choi matrix, and every operator on \(\mathbb {C}^{d'}\otimes \mathbb {C}^{d}\) is the Choi matrix of the map it defines. This is [ Wol12 , Proposition 2.1, Equation (2.4) ] .
The output-factor partial trace of the Choi matrix is \(\operatorname{tr}_A(\tau )=(T^*(\mathbb {1}_{d'}))^{T}/d\), where \(T^*\) is the trace-pairing adjoint; hence \(T^*(\mathbb {1}_{d'})=\mathbb {1}_d\), equivalently \(T\) preserves the trace, if and only if \(\operatorname{tr}_A(\tau )=\mathbb {1}_d/d\). This is the trace-preservation clause of [ Wol12 , Proposition 2.1 ] .
For every \(A\in M_{d'}(\mathbb {C})\) and \(B\in M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\),
This is the second line of [ Wol12 , Proposition 2.1, Equation (2.1) ] .
The input-factor partial trace of the Choi matrix is \(\operatorname{tr}_B(\tau )=T(\mathbb {1}_d)/d\); hence \(T(\mathbb {1}_d)=\mathbb {1}_{d'}\) if and only if \(\operatorname{tr}_B(\tau )=\mathbb {1}_{d'}/d\). This is the unitality clause of [ Wol12 , Proposition 2.1 ] .
For \(X\in M_{d\times k}(\mathbb {C})\) and \(\eta \in \mathbb {C}^{d'}\otimes \mathbb {C}^k\),
Let \(\theta (X)=X^T\) be matrix transposition on \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), with \(D \ge 1\). Then
This is [ Wol12 , Equation 3.1 ] .
Let \(d\ge 3\), \(2\le n\le d-3\), and put \(x_i=|v_i|^2\). Then
with zero-denominator summands interpreted as zero. Consequently, \(T_C(|v\rangle \! \langle v|)\ge 0\).
For every \(d\ge 3\) and \(n=d-2\), the Choi-type map \(T_C\) sends every positive semidefinite matrix to a positive semidefinite matrix. This is the case \(n=d-2\) of the positivity assertion of Wolf’s Example 3.1 and subsumes the case \(d=3\), \(n=1\).
Let \(X\) and \(Y\) be finite sets and let \(P=(P_{x,y})_{x\in X,y\in Y}\) be a joint probability distribution. With natural logarithms, \(I(X:Y)_P\leq \log \operatorname{rank}_{\mathbb {R}}P\). Equivalently, with logarithms to base two, \(2^{I(X:Y)_P}\leq \operatorname{rank}_{\mathbb {R}}P\).
For every linear map \(T\), \(r_T(0)=+\infty \) and \(\widetilde r_T(0)=-\infty \). If \(U_T(X)=\varnothing \), then \(\widetilde r_T(X)=+\infty \).
Let \(X\geq 0\) be nonzero and suppose \(T(X)=aX\) for some \(a\in \mathbb {R}\). Then
This is the pointwise equality used at local source lines 649–651.
If an observable commutes with \(H\), with every \(L_j\), and with every \(L_j^\dagger \), then it lies in \(\ker (L^*)\).
Let \(X_{AB}\in \mathbf L(H_A\otimes H_B)\) and \(Y_{BC}\in \mathbf L(H_B\otimes H_C)\) be Hermitian, and suppose \([X_{AB}\otimes \mathbb {1}_C,\mathbb {1}_A\otimes Y_{BC}]=0\). There are positive integers \(d_q,m_q\), an identification \(H_B\cong \bigoplus _{q=0}^{K-1}H_{q,l}\otimes H_{q,r}\), a unitary \(U\in \mathbf L(H_B)\), and Hermitian operators \(R_q\in \mathbf L(H_A\otimes H_{q,l})\) and \(S_q\in \mathbf L(H_{q,r}\otimes H_C)\) such that
In these formulas the two direct sums are transported to the original product coordinates through the stated identification. These are the two equalities in [ Bei12 , Lemma 2.1 ] . The operators \(R_q\) and \(S_q\) are Hermitian; they are not asserted to be unitary.
Let \(X_{AB}\in \mathbf L(H_A\otimes H_B)\) and \(Y_{BC}\in \mathbf L(H_B\otimes H_C)\), with \(Y_{BC}\) Hermitian, and suppose \([X_{AB}\otimes \mathbb {1}_C,\mathbb {1}_A\otimes Y_{BC}]=0\). There is an orthonormal decomposition \(H_B\cong \bigoplus _{q=0}^{K-1}H_{q,r}\otimes H_{q,l}\) such that all middle-factor coefficients \(X_{aa'}\) act only on \(H_{q,l}\), while all middle-factor coefficients \(Y_{cc'}\) act only on \(H_{q,r}\). More precisely, in an orthonormal basis \((e_{q,r,s})\) adapted to this decomposition,
The source lemma assumes that both overlapping operators are Hermitian; the coefficient conclusion requires Hermiticity only for \(Y_{BC}\). This is the middle-space coefficient form of [ Bei12 , Lemma 2.1 ] .
Let \(X_{AB}\in \mathbf L(H_A\otimes H_B)\) and \(Y_{BC}\in \mathbf L(H_B\otimes H_C)\). For fixed outer indices, define their middle-factor coefficient matrices by
If
then \(X_{aa'}Y_{cc'}=Y_{cc'}X_{aa'}\) for every \(a,a',c,c'\). This is the coefficientwise commutation step in the proof of [ Bei12 , Lemma 2.1 ] .
Let \(X_{AB}\in \mathbf L(H_A\otimes H_B)\) and \(Y_{BC}\in \mathbf L(H_B\otimes H_C)\) be Hermitian, and suppose \([X_{AB}\otimes \mathbb {1}_C,\mathbb {1}_A\otimes Y_{BC}]=0\). There are positive integers \(d_q,m_q\), a unitary identification \(H_B\cong \bigoplus _{q=0}^{K-1}H_{q,l}\otimes H_{q,r}\), and Hermitian operators \(R_q\in \mathbf L(H_A\otimes H_{q,l})\) and \(S_q\in \mathbf L(H_{q,r}\otimes H_C)\) such that
This is the explicit coordinate form of the two block-action identities in [ Bei12 , Lemma 2.1 ] .
Let \(I\) and \(J\) be finite, and let \(\{ R_i\} _{i\in I}\) and \(\{ S_j\} _{j\in J}\) be families of simple rings. Write \(I_i\) and \(J_j\) for the corresponding block ideals. Suppose that \(T : \prod _{i\in I}R_i \to \prod _{j\in J}S_j\) is a ring isomorphism and that an equivalence \(\sigma :I\simeq J\) satisfies \(T(I_i)=J_{\sigma (i)}\) for every \(i\in I\). Then, for each \(i\in I\), the map
from \(R_i\) to \(S_{\sigma (i)}\) is bijective.
- TwoSidedIdeal.mem_blockIdeal_iff
- TwoSidedIdeal.pi_single_mem_blockIdeal
- TwoSidedIdeal.blockComponentMap
- TwoSidedIdeal.ringEquiv_maps_single_support_between
- TwoSidedIdeal.ringEquiv_symm_maps_blockIdeal_between
- TwoSidedIdeal.blockComponentMap_injective
- TwoSidedIdeal.blockComponentMap_surjective
- TwoSidedIdeal.blockComponentMap_bijective
Let \(P\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be an orthogonal projection of rank \(n\). The corner algebra \(PM_{D}(\mathbb {C})P\) is linearly isomorphic to the full matrix algebra \(M_{n}(\mathbb {C})\). The isomorphism is built from the spectral diagonalisation of \(P\) by conjugating the top-left \(n\times n\) block by the unitary diagonalising \(P\).
Let \(\rho \succeq 0\) on \(\mathbb {C}^D\), with support projection \(P=\operatorname{supp}(\rho )\), and let \(V:\mathbb {C}^D\to \mathbb {C}^k\) be a compression isometry satisfying \(VV^\dagger =\mathbb {1}_k\) and \(V^\dagger V=P\). Then \(V\rho V^\dagger \in M_{k}(\mathbb {C})\) is positive definite.
The finiteness hypotheses below correct the attainment sentences printed at lines 72–78 of [ Wol12 , Chapter 4 ] ; the counterexamples to the unqualified statements are recorded in [ con26h ] . Suppose the primal problem is strictly feasible and \(C_p\in \mathbb R\). Then \(C_p=C_d\) and there is a dual optimizer \(y^0\in \mathcal F_d\) with \(\langle b|y^0\rangle =C_d\). Dually, if the dual problem is strictly feasible and \(C_d\in \mathbb R\), then \(C_p=C_d\) and there is a primal optimizer \(x^0\in \mathcal F_p\) with \(\langle c|x^0\rangle =C_p\).
- ConicProgram.exists_isDualOptimizer_of_isPrimalStrictlyFeasible_of_isGLB
- ConicProgram.values_eq_of_isPrimalStrictlyFeasible_of_isGLB
- ConicProgram.exists_isPrimalOptimizer_of_isDualStrictlyFeasible_of_isLUB
- ConicProgram.values_eq_of_isDualStrictlyFeasible_of_isLUB
- ConicProgram.exists_isDualOptimizer_of_isPrimalStrictlyFeasible_of_primalValue_eq_coe
- ConicProgram.values_eq_of_isPrimalStrictlyFeasible_of_primalValue_eq_coe
- ConicProgram.exists_isPrimalOptimizer_of_isDualStrictlyFeasible_of_dualValue_eq_coe
- ConicProgram.values_eq_of_isDualStrictlyFeasible_of_dualValue_eq_coe
If \(\mathcal F_p\) is nonempty and \(p\in \mathbb {R}\), then \(C_p=p\) in the extended real line if and only if \(p\) is the greatest lower bound of \(\{ \langle c|x\rangle :x\in \mathcal F_p\} \). If \(\mathcal F_d\) is nonempty, then \(C_d=p\) if and only if \(p\) is the least upper bound of \(\{ \langle b|y\rangle :y\in \mathcal F_d\} \).
If \(x\in \mathcal F_p\), \(y\in \mathcal F_d\), and \(\langle c|x\rangle =\langle b|y\rangle \), then \(x\) and \(y\) are primal and dual optimizers, respectively, and \(C_p=C_d=\langle c|x\rangle =\langle b|y\rangle \).
For every \(X\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), the conjugation filter \(\rho \mapsto X\rho X^\dagger \) is completely positive, hence positive. Therefore, if \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) is positive, then \(\rho \mapsto T(X\rho X^\dagger )\) is positive. If in addition \(X^\dagger X=\mathbb {1}\), then the conjugation filter is trace-preserving and hence is a quantum channel.
Let \(Y\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be invertible. Then the map \(X\mapsto YXY^\dagger \) and the map \(X\mapsto YX^TY^\dagger \) each map the positive semidefinite cone onto itself. This is the implication (3) \(\Rightarrow \) (1) of [ Wol12 , Proposition 3.6 ] .
Every norm-continuous dynamical semigroup \(T\) on \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) is of the form \(T_t = e^{tL}\) for some generator \(L \in \operatorname{End}_{\mathbb {C}}(M_{D}(\mathbb {C}))\) and every \(t \ge 0\). This is [ Wol12 , Proposition 7.1 ] .
Let \(K\) be finite, let \(m_k\geq 1\), and set
For \(A\in \operatorname{End}(\mathcal H)\), write \(A_{kk}\) for its \(k\)-th diagonal block. The map
has zero off-diagonal output blocks. It is trace-preserving and completely positive, and it is a conditional expectation onto the coordinate subalgebra
Thus its range lies in this subalgebra, it fixes the subalgebra pointwise, and it is unital and idempotent. This is the normalized trace-preserving coordinate choice obtained by specializing the block densities in [ Wol12 , Proposition 1.5 and Equation (1.40) ] to maximally mixed densities. Relative to Wolf’s \(M_{d_k}(\mathbb {C})\otimes \mathbb 1_{m_k}\) convention, the displayed \(\mathbb 1_{m_k}\otimes M_{d_k}(\mathbb {C})\) order is obtained by interchanging the tensor factors. This theorem concerns only the displayed direct-sum coordinates; it does not conjugate the subalgebra by an arbitrary unitary or corestrict the codomain. This coordinate restriction is documented in [ con26j ] .
- Matrix.coordinateDirectSumConditionalExpectation_apply
- Matrix.coordinateDirectSumConditionalExpectation_offDiagonal
- Matrix.coordinateDirectSumConditionalExpectation_isKrausCPTP
- Matrix.coordinateDirectSumConditionalExpectation_range_subset
- Matrix.coordinateDirectSumConditionalExpectation_fixes
- Matrix.coordinateDirectSumConditionalExpectation_idempotent
- Matrix.coordinateDirectSumConditionalExpectation_unital
- Matrix.coordinateDirectSumConditionalExpectation_isConditionalExpectation
- Matrix.coordinateDirectSumConditionalExpectation_isKrausCPTP_and_isConditionalExpectation
Let \(P,Q\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be matrices, and suppose that \(V_P,V_Q:\mathbb C^n\to \mathbb C^D\) satisfy
Write \(\Phi _P(X)=V_PXV_P^*\) and \(\Phi _Q(X)=V_QXV_Q^*\) for the corresponding linear isomorphisms onto the two corners. For every unitary \(W\in M_{n}(\mathbb {C})\), there is a matrix \(U\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) such that
and, for every \(X\in M_{n}(\mathbb {C})\),
Let \(P,Q\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be orthogonal projections. If
is a bijective complex-linear map preserving multiplication and the adjoint, then there is a matrix \(U\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) such that
and
for every \(X\in QM_{D}(\mathbb {C})Q\).
Let \(E(X)=\sum _iK_iXK_i^\dagger \) be a trace-preserving Kraus map on \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), with Heisenberg-picture adjoint \(E^*(Y)=\sum _iK_i^\dagger YK_i\), let \(\rho \succeq 0\) satisfy \(E(\rho )=\rho \), and let \(Q\) be the support projection of \(\rho \). There are a sector dimension \(r\leq D\), a number \(n\) of blocks, positive dimensions \(d_0,\ldots ,d_{n-1}\) and multiplicities \(m_0,\ldots ,m_{n-1}\) with \(\sum _kd_km_k=r\), realized by an explicit identification of the index sets, and an isometry \(W:\mathbb {C}^r\to \mathbb {C}^D\) with \(W^\dagger W=\mathbb {1}_r\) and \(WW^\dagger =Q\), such that a matrix \(Y\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) satisfies \(QYQ=Y\) and \(QE^*(Y)Q=Y\) exactly when
for some matrices \(B_k\in M_{d_k}(\mathbb {C})\); that is, up to reordering the two tensor factors of each block,
The right-hand side is the support-sector block representation in Equation (1.39) of [ Wol12 ] ; the equivalence characterizes the corner-restricted set, not the ambient fixed-point space.
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be positive and trace preserving, and suppose that \(T^*\) satisfies the Schwarz inequality. Let \(\rho \succeq 0\) satisfy \(T(\rho )=\rho \), and let \(Q=\operatorname{supp}(\rho )\). Then
is a \(*\)-subalgebra of the corner algebra \(QM_{D}(\mathbb {C})Q\). Wolf chooses a maximum-rank fixed point; the formal theorem strengthens the support choice to an arbitrary PSD fixed point while retaining exactly the source assumptions on \(T\). This is [ Wol12 , Corollary 6.6 and Equation (6.61) ] .
For any finite Kraus-like families \(\{ A_i\} , \{ B_i\} \), the map \(T(X) = \sum _i A_i X B_i^\dagger \) satisfies \(4\, T = T_1 - T_2 + i\, T_3 - i\, T_4\) with each \(T_k\) a CP map given explicitly by a single-side Kraus sum of the combined families. The hypothesis is that \(T\) is presented in sandwich-sum form on a single matrix algebra \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\); Theorem 2.6.11 decomposes an arbitrary linear map \(M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{d'}(\mathbb {C})\).
Let \(T_i:M_{d'}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\) be completely positive maps with \(T_1\leq T_2\). Suppose that, for possibly distinct ancilla dimensions \(r_i\), matrices \(V_i:\mathbb {C}^d\to \mathbb {C}^{d'}\otimes \mathbb {C}^{r_i}\) are supplied and satisfy
Then there is a contraction \(C:\mathbb {C}^{r_2}\to \mathbb {C}^{r_1}\) such that
If \(V_2\) is minimal, in the source sense \(r_2=\operatorname{rank}(\tau _2)\), then \(C\) is unique. This is [ Wol12 , Theorem 2.3 and Equation (2.13) ] .
Let \(T_1,T_2:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be completely positive. There exist an ancilla dimension \(m\), a Kraus family \(K\) with Stinespring matrix \(V=V_K\), and positive semidefinite operators \(P_1,P_2:\mathbb {C}^m\to \mathbb {C}^m\) with \(P_1+P_2=\mathbb {1}_m\) such that, for \(i=1,2\) and every \(A\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\),
Let \(E\) be completely positive, let \(\rho \geq 0\) satisfy \(E(\rho )=\rho \), and let \(Q\) be the support projection of \(\rho \). Then \(Q\) is an orthogonal projection and
for every \(X\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\).
Let \(T:M_D(\mathbb {C})\to M_D(\mathbb {C})\) be a positive linear map. If \(T\) has commutative range, or \(T^*\) has commutative range, then \(T\) is completely positive. This is [ Wol12 , Proposition 1.6 ] ; the commutative-range hypothesis is the range-only reading of Wolf’s “\(\mathcal A\) or \(\mathcal B\) commutative” hypothesis that his own proof establishes and that his remark immediately after the proof licenses for an arbitrary operator system mapping into a commutative algebra. See [ con26k ] for the precise relationship between the two phrasings.
Let \(D\geq 1\). A linear map \(T : M_{D}(\mathbb {C}) \to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) is completely positive (in the Kraus sense) if and only if its Choi matrix \(\tau \ge 0\). This is the \(d=d'\) specialization of [ Wol12 , Proposition 2.1 ] .
Every rectangular Kraus completely positive map is positive. In particular, every square completely positive map is positive.
Let \(E : M_{D}(\mathbb {C}) \to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be completely positive in the Kraus sense. For every \(k\) and every positive block matrix \(M \in M_k(M_{D}(\mathbb {C}))\), the entrywise image \((E(M_{ab}))_{a,b}\) is again positive in \(M_k(M_{D}(\mathbb {C}))\).
Let \(I\) be a nonempty finite set, and let \(T_i,T:M_{d'}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\) be completely positive linear maps such that \(\sum _{i\in I}T_i=T\). Suppose that a Stinespring representation of \(T\) is supplied by a linear map \(V:\mathbb {C}^d\to \mathbb {C}^{d'}\otimes \mathbb {C}^r\) satisfying
Then there are positive semidefinite operators \(P_i\in M_{r}(\mathbb {C})\) such that
This is the rectangular Heisenberg-picture statement of [ Wol12 , Theorem 2.4 ] . The nonempty-family condition is made explicit; see [ con26d ] .
Let \(K\) be a finite unital matrix family whose Kraus map is irreducible, and suppose the adjoint Kraus map fixes a positive-definite matrix. If the peripheral spectrum is generated by a primitive \(m\)-th root \(\gamma \), then there are a unitary \(U\) and orthogonal projections \(P_0,\ldots ,P_{m-1}\) summing to \(\mathbb {1}\) such that \(E_K(U^k)=\gamma ^kU^k\), \(U^m=\mathbb {1}\), \(U=\sum _{k=0}^{m-1}\gamma ^kP_k\), and \(E_K(P_{k+1})=P_k\).
Let \(d'\geq 1\) and let \(T\colon M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{d'}(\mathbb {C})\). Then \(T\) is decomposable if and only if the output-first Choi matrix of its trace adjoint \(T^*\colon M_{d'}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\) is a decomposable witness:
If \(\Phi \colon M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{d'}(\mathbb {C})\) is decomposable and \(\rho \) is a positive semidefinite matrix on \(\mathbb {C}^{d}\otimes \mathbb {C}^{k}\) with the PPT property, then \((\Phi \otimes \operatorname{id})(\rho )\ge 0\).
This is the chosen change of basis in the proof of [ Wol12 , Chapter 8, Proposition “Jordan condition number and detailed balance” ] . Let \(S,A\in M_n(\mathbb C)\), with \(S{\gt}0\) and \(SA^\dagger =AS\). There are a unitary \(U\) and a real diagonal matrix \(D\) such that, for
one has
This is a statement about Wolf’s displayed, chosen diagonalizing basis; it does not identify that factor with the infimum \(\kappa _T\).
This is the square-root conjugation in the proof of [ Wol12 , Chapter 8, Proposition “Jordan condition number and detailed balance” ] . Let \(S,A\in M_n(\mathbb C)\), with \(S{\gt}0\). If \(SA^\dagger =AS\), then \(S^{-1/2}AS^{1/2}\) is Hermitian.
This is the fixed-point observation in [ Wol12 , Chapter 8, Proposition “Jordan condition number and detailed balance” ] . Let \(\sigma {\gt}0\) and set \(\Sigma (X)=\sqrt\sigma \, X\sqrt\sigma \). If \(\Sigma T^*=T\Sigma \) and \(T^*(\mathbb {1})=\mathbb {1}\), then \(T(\sigma )=\sigma \).
This is the matrix-representation step in the proof of [ Wol12 , Chapter 8, Equation (8.110) ] . Let \(T:M_d(\mathbb C)\to M_d(\mathbb C)\) be Hermiticity preserving and let \(\Sigma :M_d(\mathbb C)\to M_d(\mathbb C)\) be linear. If \(\Sigma T^*=T\Sigma \), then
Let \(\{ D_i\} _{i\in I}\) and \(\{ E_j\} _{j\in J}\) be positive integers. A star-algebra isomorphism
determines an equivalence \(\sigma :I\simeq J\) such that the isomorphism carries the \(i\)-th block ideal onto the \(\sigma (i)\)-th block ideal and \(D_i=E_{\sigma (i)}\) for every \(i\in I\). For an automorphism of one product, the induced permutation may exchange equal-dimensional block ideals; it preserves the dimension along each matched pair.
Let \(\iota \) be the block-diagonal embedding of \(\bigoplus _{k{\lt}r}M_{d_k}(\mathbb {C})\) into \(M_M(\mathbb {C})\), \(M=\sum _kd_k\). If \(S\subseteq \bigoplus _{k{\lt}r}M_{d_k}(\mathbb {C})\) is an operator system, then \(\iota (S)\) is an operator system in \(M_M(\mathbb {C})\); and if \(T:S\to M_{p}(\mathbb {C})\) is completely positive on \(S\), then the induced map \(T'':\iota (S)\to M_{p}(\mathbb {C})\), \(T''(\iota (X))=T(X)\), is completely positive on \(\iota (S)\).
For every \(A\in \mathcal A\), every \(X\in \operatorname{End}(\mathcal H_A)\), and every linear endomorphism \(T:\mathcal A\to \mathcal A\),
Let \(T:\mathcal A\to \mathcal A\) be a linear endomorphism of a finite sum of matrix algebras. For every \(A\in \mathcal A\),
Let \(\mathcal A=\bigoplus _{i\in I}M_{n_i}(\mathbb {C})\) be a finite direct sum. Suppose that \(T:\mathcal A\to \mathcal A\) is positive and preserves the total trace, that its trace adjoint satisfies the Schwarz inequality, and that \(T\) fixes a family \(\rho =(\rho _i)_i\) with every \(\rho _i\) positive definite. Then there are positive integers \(d_k,m_k\), density matrices \(\sigma _k\in M_{m_k}(\mathbb {C})\), a unitary \(U\) on \(\bigoplus _i\mathbb {C}^{n_i}\), and a reindexing of this space by \(\bigoplus _k(\mathbb {C}^{m_k}\otimes \mathbb {C}^{d_k})\) such that \(T(A)=A\) if and only if there are matrices \(X_k\in M_{d_k}(\mathbb {C})\) satisfying
Here \(\iota \) is the block-diagonal embedding. This is the finite-direct-sum fixed-point step used in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.4, lines 1980–1995 ] ; it does not assert the channel hypotheses for the particular sector maps in that argument. This is the full-support restriction: the support reduction and complementary zero summand of the general theorem remain open.
In the endomorphic case \(\mathcal B=\mathcal A\), write \(\mathcal H=\mathcal H_A=\mathcal H_B\) and \(\iota =\iota _A=\iota _B\). If \(T\) is positive and satisfies the Schwarz inequality on \(\mathcal A\), then \(\widehat T\) is positive and satisfies the Schwarz inequality on \(\operatorname{End}(\mathcal H)\). If \(T\) preserves the total trace \(\sum _k\operatorname{tr}(A_k)\), then \(\widehat T\) preserves the ordinary trace. Moreover, \((\widehat T)^*=\widehat{T^*}\). If \(T\) is positive and its direct-sum trace adjoint satisfies the Schwarz inequality, then the trace adjoint of \(\widehat T\) satisfies the Schwarz inequality on \(\operatorname{End}(\mathcal H)\). Finally,
Equivalently, for every \(X\in \operatorname{End}(\mathcal H)\),
- Matrix.IsPositiveDirectSumMap.directSumExtension_isPositiveMap
- Matrix.IsSchwarzDirectSumMap.directSumExtension_isSchwarzMap
- Matrix.IsTracePreservingDirectSumMap.directSumExtension_isTracePreservingMap
- Matrix.traceAdjointMap_directSumExtension
- Matrix.IsSchwarzDirectSumMap.traceAdjointMap_directSumExtension_isSchwarzMap
- Matrix.directSumExtension_apply_eq_self_iff
Let \(\{ D_i\} _{i\in I}\) and \(\{ E_j\} _{j\in J}\) be positive integers, and set
If \(T:\mathcal A\to \mathcal B\) and \(S:\mathcal B\to \mathcal A\) are mutually inverse completely positive trace-preserving maps, let \(\Phi :\mathcal A\simeq \mathcal B\) be the star-algebra isomorphism obtained from their trace adjoints. Write \(I_i\) and \(J_j\) for the block ideals of \(\mathcal A\) and \(\mathcal B\), respectively. Then there is an equivalence \(\sigma :I\simeq J\) such that, for every \(i\in I\),
This is the simple-summand matching conclusion used in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.4, line 1997 ] ; the unitary action within the paired summands is a separate conclusion.
Let \(T:\mathcal A\to \mathcal B\) and \(S:\mathcal B\to \mathcal A\) be mutually inverse completely positive trace-preserving maps between finite products of nonzero full matrix algebras. There are an equivalence \(\sigma :I\simeq J\), equalities \(D_i=E_{\sigma (i)}\), and unitaries \(U_i\in M_{E_{\sigma (i)}}(\mathbb {C})\) such that
with the nonzero entry in (67) in position \(\sigma (i)\) and the entries on the left and right of (68) in positions \(\sigma (i)\) and \(i\), respectively. These identities hold for every \(i\in I\), \(X\in M_{D_i}(\mathbb {C})\), and \(Y\in M_{E_{\sigma (i)}}(\mathbb {C})\).
Let \(T:\mathcal A\to \mathcal B\) and \(S:\mathcal B\to \mathcal A\) be mutually inverse completely positive trace-preserving maps between finite direct sums of full matrix algebras. Their trace adjoints are mutually inverse unital completely positive maps. Moreover, for all \(X,Y\in \mathcal B\),
and likewise for \(S^*\). Thus \(T^*\) and \(S^*\) determine mutually inverse star-algebra equivalences. This theorem does not yet identify the simple summands or their dimensions.
- IsKrausCP.kadison_schwarz_of_map_one_eq_one
- Matrix.IsSchwarzBetweenDirectSums
- Matrix.IsKrausDirectSumMap.isSchwarzBetweenDirectSums
- Matrix.IsKrausDirectSumMap.map_conjTranspose_between
- Matrix.schwarz_equality_of_mutual_inverse_kraus_direct_sum_maps
- Matrix.map_mul_of_mutual_inverse_kraus_direct_sum_maps
- Matrix.starAlgEquivOfMutualInverseKrausDirectSumMaps
- Matrix.starAlgEquivOfMutualInverseKrausDirectSumMaps_apply
- Matrix.starAlgEquivOfMutualInverseKrausDirectSumMaps_symm_apply
- Matrix.directSumTraceAdjointMapBetween_comp_eq_id_of_comp_eq_id
- Matrix.directSumTraceAdjointMapBetween_map_mul_of_mutual_inverse
- Matrix.directSumTraceAdjointStarAlgEquiv
- Matrix.directSumTraceAdjointStarAlgEquiv_apply
- Matrix.directSumTraceAdjointStarAlgEquiv_symm_apply
Let \(\iota _j\) be the block-diagonal embedding
Then \(\iota _j(X)\) is positive semidefinite exactly when every \(X_k\) is positive semidefinite. Moreover, for all \(a,b{\lt}j\),
Retain an equivalence \(\sigma :I\simeq J\) which matches the block ideals of a star-algebra isomorphism \(\Phi :\prod _{i\in I}M_{D_i}(\mathbb {C})\simeq \prod _{j\in J}M_{E_j}(\mathbb {C})\), together with equalities \(D_i=E_{\sigma (i)}\). Then there are unitaries \(U_i\in M_{E_{\sigma (i)}}(\mathbb {C})\) such that, for every \(X\in M_{D_i}(\mathbb {C})\),
where \(\iota _i\) is the reindexing induced by the retained dimension equality. In particular, this conclusion applies to the trace-adjoint star-algebra isomorphism of any mutually inverse completely positive trace-preserving pair. This is the blockwise-unitary statement in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.4, line 1997 ] ; it does not assert the later MPDO multiplicity or coefficient relations.
Let \(E:M_{D_{\rm in}}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D_{\rm out}}(\mathbb {C})\) be a \(2\)-positive complex-linear map. For every \(A,B\in M_{D_{\rm in}}(\mathbb {C})\),
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be a positive trace-preserving linear map with \(D{\gt}0\). Then there exists a nonzero positive semidefinite matrix \(\rho \) such that \(T(\rho )=\rho \). This is the eigenvalue-\(1\) assertion of [ Wol12 , Proposition 6.1 ] .
Let \(D \ge 1\) and let \(E\) be an irreducible completely positive map on \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\). Suppose \(\rho , \sigma \ge 0\) are nonzero positive semidefinite matrices satisfying \(E(\rho ) = r_1\rho \) and \(E(\sigma ) = r_2\sigma \) for real scalars \(r_1, r_2 {\gt} 0\). Then \(r_1 = r_2\).
Let \(T_N(K)\) be the span of the products of at most \(N\) matrices from a finite family \(K\). If \(D{\gt}0\) and \(T_N(K)=M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), then there are a word \(w\), a nonzero scalar \(\mu \), and a nonzero vector \(\varphi \in \mathbb {C}^D\) such that
Let \(K=(K^i)_{i=0}^{d-1}\) be a finite family of \(D\times D\) matrices, where \(D{\gt}0\), and suppose that \(S_n(K)=M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) for every sufficiently large \(n\). If \(\varphi \neq 0\), \(\mu \neq 0\), and \(K^{i_0}\varphi =\mu \varphi \), then \(H_{D-1}(K,\varphi )=\mathbb {C}^D\).
For the reference in (71),
after canonical reassociation of the three tensor factors. The raw support-map summand is the maximally mixed specialization of [ HJPW04 , equation (10) ] . The complementary summand comes from the chosen support completion in (77). This theorem does not assert a Hayashi–Koashi–Imoto decomposition.
Let \(\rho \) be a Hermitian matrix and let \(\log \rho \) be its logarithm defined through the functional calculus. Then
If \(\rho _{BC}\) is positive semidefinite and \(\rho _B=\operatorname{tr}_C\rho _{BC}\), then
If \(P_B\) is the support projector of \(\rho _B\), then the support projector of \(d_A^{-1}\mathbf1_A\otimes \rho _B\) is
For the reference in (71),
For any PSD Hermitian matrix \(\rho \) with \(\operatorname{tr}(\rho ) = 1\) on an arbitrary finite index set, \(S(\rho ) \ge 0\). This is the analog of Theorem 13.4.4 for arbitrary finite index sets: it does not require the index set to be \(\{ 0,\ldots ,D{-}1\} \), so it applies to bipartite density matrices on \(\mathbb {C}^{d_A} \otimes \mathbb {C}^{d_B}\).
Let \(A=\sum _j M_j\) be a finite sum of Hermitian matrices. Suppose there are operators \(P_j\) such that
Then \(S(A)=\sum _j S(M_j)\). The operators \(P_j\) need only resolve the support of \(A\); their sum need not be the identity on the ambient space. This is the support form of the direct-sum entropy identity used in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1760–1770 ] .
For the reference in (71), the chosen complementary preparation term factors as
after the canonical reassociation of the three tensor factors. This follows from the chosen support completion in (77), not from [ HJPW04 , equation (10) ] .
For the reference in (71), the support Petz map for \(\operatorname{tr}_C\) factors as
after the canonical identification \((H_A\otimes H_B)\otimes H_C\cong H_A\otimes (H_B\otimes H_C)\). This is the maximally mixed specialization of [ HJPW04 , equation (10) ] . It is the tensor-product identity for the raw Petz support formula, not the Hayashi–Koashi–Imoto block decomposition.
For the reference in (65), the raw Petz map for \(\operatorname{tr}_C\) satisfies
Equivalently, for every product operator \(A_0\otimes X_B\),
The formulas use the canonical identification \((H_A\otimes H_B)\otimes H_C\cong H_A\otimes (H_B\otimes H_C)\).
This is the globally valid ambient-space form of [ HJPW04 , equation (10) ] . The literal identity-tensored formula in that equation is obtained on the support of \(\rho _A\), or after choosing an extension away from that support. For singular \(\rho _A\), the raw map on the full matrix algebra contains the compression \(X\mapsto P_AXP_A\).
Let \(X\) be an operator on \(H_A\otimes H_B\). If
then
If \(\rho _A\) is positive definite, then \(P_A=\mathbf1_A\), and this identity holds for every \(X\).
When \(\rho _A\) is singular, no global identity-tensored formula is asserted for the raw map outside the displayed support. Nor is the generic trace-preserving completion in Definition 13.4.63 asserted to factor: its complementary projection is \(\mathbf1_{AB}-P_A\otimes P_B\), which need not be the identity on \(A\) tensored with a projection on \(B\).
Set \(\rho _B=\operatorname{tr}_C\rho _{BC}\), and let \(P_A\) and \(P_B\) be the support projections of \(\rho _A\) and \(\rho _B\). Then
Each identity is understood after the same canonical reassociation of the three tensor factors.
For any tripartite density matrix \(\rho _{ABC}\), equality in strong subadditivity holds if and only if \(\rho _{ABC}\) admits a quantum Markov decomposition on the middle subsystem \(B\).
This formulation introduces no new axiom: it is the same equality criterion as Theorem 13.6.77.
For any tripartite density matrix \(\rho _{ABC}\) on \(A \otimes B \otimes C\),
This formulation introduces no new axiom: it is the same strong-subadditivity statement as Theorem 13.6.4, which is proved there from Lieb concavity along the relative-entropy route [ LR73 ] .
Let \(\rho \) be a Hermitian matrix indexed by a finite set \(J\), and let \(e : I \to J\) be a bijection from a finite set \(I\). The reindexed matrix on \(I\) with entries \(\rho _{e(i)\, e(j)}\) has the same von Neumann entropy as \(\rho \).
Let \(\omega _j\) be density matrices and let \(p_j\geq 0\). Then
In particular, when the \(p_j\) form a probability distribution, this is
This is the entropy identity used in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1760–1770 ] .
Let \(d\geq 1\), let \(T:M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{d'}(\mathbb {C})\) be a quantum channel, and let \(V:\mathbb {C}^d\to \mathbb {C}^{d'}\otimes \mathbb {C}^r\) be a supplied Stinespring matrix such that
Suppose \(n\geq 1\) and \(T=\sum _{i=0}^{n-1}T_i\), where every \(T_i:M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{d'}(\mathbb {C})\) is completely positive. Then there is a POVM \(\{ P_i\} _{i=0}^{n-1}\) on \(\mathbb {C}^r\) such that, for every \(i\) and \(\rho \),
If \(k_i\) is the Kraus rank, equivalently the Choi rank, of \(T_i\), then \(k_i\leq \operatorname{rank}(P_i)\).
Assume \(D{\gt}0\). Every bipartite matrix \(W\) on \(\mathbb {C}^D\otimes \mathbb {C}^D\) is the Choi matrix \(\tau _T=(T\otimes \mathbb {1})(|\Omega \rangle \langle \Omega |)\) of some linear map \(T\colon M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\).
Let \(\rho \) be a trace-one Hermitian bipartite state whose Schmidt number exceeds \(n\). Then there is a Hermitian operator \(W\) such that, for every \(\psi \) of Schmidt rank at most \(n\),
This is the only-if direction of Wolf’s Proposition 3.3 [ Wol12 , Chapter 3, Proposition 3.3 ] : a state of Schmidt number larger than \(n\) is detected by an entanglement witness for \(S_n\).
If \(t_0{\gt}0\), \(T_{t_0}\) is irreducible, and \(\sigma \) is fixed for all times, then there exists a positive time step \(u\) such that \(T_{t_0}=(T_u)^{(\dim M_{D}(\mathbb {C}))!}\), the slice \(T_u\) is a channel, \(T_u\) is irreducible, and \(T_u(\sigma )=\sigma \).
Every real-linear functional \(g\) on the space of square complex matrices is the trace form of a Hermitian matrix: there is a Hermitian \(H_0\) with \(g(X)=\operatorname{Re}\operatorname{tr}(X H_0)\) for every Hermitian \(X\).
Assume \(d'{\gt}0\). Let \(W\) be a Hermitian operator on \(\mathbb {C}^d\otimes \mathbb {C}^{d'}\) with \(\operatorname{Re}\langle \psi |W|\psi \rangle \ge 0\) for every \(\psi \) of Schmidt rank at most \(n\). Then \(W\) is the Choi matrix of an \(n\)-positive map \(P\colon M_{d'}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\). This is the Choi–Jamiołkowski translation of the entanglement witness of Wolf’s Proposition 3.3 into the \(n\)-positive map of Wolf’s Proposition 3.4 [ Wol12 , Chapter 3, Proposition 3.4 ] .
Let \(\rho \) be a trace-one Hermitian bipartite state on \(\mathbb {C}^d\otimes \mathbb {C}^{d'}\) whose Schmidt number exceeds \(n\). Then there is an \(n\)-positive map \(T\colon M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{d'}(\mathbb {C})\) such that \((T\otimes \mathbb {1}_{d'})(\rho )\) is not positive semidefinite. This is the if direction of Wolf’s Proposition 3.4 [ Wol12 , Chapter 3, Proposition 3.4, Equations (3.13)–(3.14) ] .
If two pure-state ensembles \(\{ \psi _i\} _{i \in \iota _1}\) and \(\{ \phi _j\} _{j \in \iota _2}\) induce the same pure-ensemble density operator and \(|\iota _2| \le |\iota _1|\), then there exists a tall isometric mixing matrix \(V \in \mathbb {C}^{\iota _1 \times \iota _2}\) with \(V^\dagger V = \mathbb {1}\) and \(\psi _i = \sum _j V_{ij} \phi _j\). The cardinality hypothesis is what makes \(V\) a tall isometry; the symmetric case \(|\iota _1| \le |\iota _2|\) follows by swapping the roles of the ensembles.
Every quantum channel \(E : M_{D}(\mathbb {C}) \to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) admits a finite family \((K_i)_i\) in \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) such that, for every \(X \in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\),
and
For every POVM \(\{ E_i\} \) on \(\mathbb {C}^D\) there exist a dilation dimension \(r\), an isometry \(V:\mathbb {C}^D\to \mathbb {C}^D\otimes \mathbb {C}^r\), and a projective measurement \(\{ P_i\} \) on the dilation satisfying \(E_i=V^\dagger P_iV\).
Let \(T : M_{D}(\mathbb {C}) \to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be a completely positive map whose Choi matrix is positive-definite (equivalently, \(T\) has full Kraus rank). Then there exist SL-filterings \(\Phi _{1},\Phi _{2}\) such that \(\Phi _{2}\circ T\circ \Phi _{1}\) is doubly-stochastic.
This is the equal-dimension (square) case \(T : M_{D}(\mathbb {C}) \to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) of [ Wol12 , Proposition 2.9 ] ; the rectangular form with independent dimensions is Theorem 3.15.1.24.
Let \(T : M_{d_1}(\mathbb {C}) \to M_{d_2}(\mathbb {C})\) be a completely positive map whose Choi matrix is positive-definite (equivalently, \(T\) has full Kraus rank). Then there exist SL-filterings \(\Phi _{1}\) on \(M_{d_1}(\mathbb {C})\) and \(\Phi _{2}\) on \(M_{d_2}(\mathbb {C})\) such that \(\Phi _{2}\circ T\circ \Phi _{1}\) is doubly-stochastic. This is [ Wol12 , Proposition 2.9 ] at the source’s generality.
Let \(\tau \in \mathcal{B}(\mathbb {C}^{d_2}\otimes \mathbb {C}^{d_1})\) be positive-definite. Then there exist \(S_i\in \mathrm{SL}(d_i,\mathbb {C})\) which attain the infimum
In particular, for
both partial traces are proportional to the respective identity matrices:
for some \(\kappa _1,\kappa _2\in \mathbb {C}\). This is [ Wol12 , Proposition 2.8, lines 894–919 ] , with the two dimensions kept independent.
Let \(E\) be an irreducible completely positive map on \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), let \(A \ge 0\) be nonzero, and let \(t {\gt} 0\). Then
This is the completely positive specialization of the forward implication in [ Wol12 , Theorem 6.2(3) ] .
Let \(E\) be an irreducible completely positive map on \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), let \(A \ge 0\) be nonzero, and let \(t {\gt} 0\). Then the finite exponential truncation satisfies
This is the finite-sum core of the completely positive specialization of [ Wol12 , Theorem 6.2(3) ] .
For all \(t,s \in \mathbb {R}\), \(e^{(t+s)L} = e^{tL} \cdot e^{sL}\).
The map \(t \mapsto e^{tL}\) is continuous in the operator norm topology.
Let \(m,n\ge 1\), let \(S\subseteq M_{m}(\mathbb {C})\) be an operator system, and let \(T:S\to M_{n}(\mathbb {C})\) be a completely positive linear map on \(S\). Then there is a completely positive map \(T':M_{m}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{n}(\mathbb {C})\), in rectangular Kraus form, that agrees with \(T\) on \(S\).
Let \(d_0,\dots ,d_{r-1}\) be natural numbers, not all zero, let \(p\ge 1\), let \(S\subseteq \bigoplus _{k{\lt}r}M_{d_k}(\mathbb {C})\) be an operator system (Definition 1.7.1), and let \(T:S\to M_{p}(\mathbb {C})\) be completely positive on \(S\) (Definition 1.7.2). Then there is a completely positive map \(T':\bigoplus _{k{\lt}r}M_{d_k}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{p}(\mathbb {C})\) (Definition 1.7.3) that agrees with \(T\) on \(S\).
Let \(d_0,\dots ,d_{r-1}\) be natural numbers, not all zero, let \(p\geq 1\), let \(S\subseteq \bigoplus _{k{\lt}r}M_{d_k}(\mathbb {C})\) be an operator system, let \(\mathcal B\subseteq M_{p}(\mathbb {C})\) be a unital \(*\)-subalgebra, and let \(T:S\to \mathcal B\) be completely positive, where positivity in \(\mathcal B\) is read through its inclusion in \(M_{p}(\mathbb {C})\). Then there is a linear map
whose inclusion into \(M_{p}(\mathbb {C})\) is completely positive and which satisfies \(\widetilde T|_S=T\).
Let \(d_0,\dots ,d_{r-1}\) be natural numbers, not all zero, let \(p\geq 1\), let \(S\subseteq \bigoplus _{k{\lt}r}M_{d_k}(\mathbb {C})\) be an operator system, and let \(\mathcal B\subseteq M_{p}(\mathbb {C})\) be a unital \(*\)-subalgebra. Suppose that \(T:S\to M_{p}(\mathbb {C})\) is completely positive and \(T(S)\subseteq \mathcal B\). Then there is a completely positive map \(G:\bigoplus _{k{\lt}r}M_{d_k}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{p}(\mathbb {C})\) such that \(G(\bigoplus _{k{\lt}r}M_{d_k}(\mathbb {C}))\subseteq \mathcal B\) and \(G|_S=T\).
A density matrix is convex-extreme if and only if it is a rank-one orthogonal projection. In Wolf’s terminology, these and only these are the pure density states of a full matrix algebra.
- Matrix.pureDensityMatrices
- Matrix.mem_pureDensityMatrices
- Matrix.IsRankOneOrthogonalProjection.mem_densityMatrices
- Matrix.IsUnitVector.isRankOneOrthogonalProjection_pureStateProj
- Matrix.IsRankOneOrthogonalProjection.exists_isUnitVector_pureStateProj
- Matrix.IsRankOneOrthogonalProjection.mem_extremePoints_densityMatrices
- Matrix.densityMatrices_eq_convexHull_pureDensityMatrices
- Matrix.extremePoints_densityMatrices
- Matrix.mem_extremePoints_densityMatrices_iff
A density state on \(\bigoplus _{k\in I}M_{d_k}(\mathbb {C})\) is convex-extreme if and only if exactly one block is nonzero and that block is a rank-one orthogonal projection. These are the relative pure states of the direct sum.
- Matrix.pureDirectSumDensityMatrices
- Matrix.mem_pureDirectSumDensityMatrices
- Matrix.pureDirectSumDensityMatrices_subset_directSumDensityMatrices
- Matrix.directSumDensityMatrices_eq_convexHull_pureDirectSumDensityMatrices
- Matrix.pureDirectSumDensityMatrices_subset_extremePoints
- Matrix.extremePoints_directSumDensityMatrices
- Matrix.mem_extremePoints_directSumDensityMatrices_iff
Assume \(d{\gt}0\). Let \(T:M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{d'}(\mathbb {C})\) be \(k\)-positive, with Choi matrix \(\tau \). If a right-factor matrix has the form \(P=VV^\dagger \) with \(V\in M_{d\times k}(\mathbb {C})\), then \(R_P\tau R_P^\dagger \geq 0\).
In the setting of Theorem 13.11.1.5, the two marginals of \(\rho _c\) satisfy
Both compressed marginals are positive definite, including when one of their spaces has dimension zero.
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D'}(\mathbb {C})\) be a positive map between matrix algebras of possibly different dimensions, and let \(X\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) satisfy \(X^\dagger T^*(\mathbb {1})X=\mathbb {1}\), where \(T^*\) is the trace-pairing adjoint. Then \(\rho \mapsto T(X\rho X^\dagger )\) is positive and trace-preserving.
This is the algebraic trace-normalization step in the proof of [ Wol12 , Chapter 3, Lemma “Making positive maps trace preserving” ] . The inverse-square-root choice is recorded in the next theorem.
Let \(T\) be an endomorphism of a complex normed space, let \(S\subseteq \mathbb {C}\) be finite, and let \((n_k)_{k\geq 0}\) be a sequence of nonnegative integers such that \(\mu ^{n_k}\to 1\) for every \(\mu \in S\). If \(x\) belongs to the sum of the \(\mu \)-eigenspaces for \(\mu \in S\), then \(T^{n_k}(x)\to x\).
Let \(E\) be a unital Kraus map on \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) whose adjoint map \(E^*\) has a positive definite fixed point \(\rho {\gt}0\). There are \(n\in \mathbb {N}\), positive dimensions \(d_k\) and multiplicities \(m_k\) with \(\sum _kd_km_k=D\), and a unitary \(U\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) such that a matrix \(X\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) satisfies \(E(X)=X\) exactly when
for some matrices \(B_k\in M_{d_k}(\mathbb {C})\). This is Theorem 10.6.15 with the roles of the map and its adjoint exchanged.
Let \(E:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be positive and unital, and suppose that, for every \(A\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), it satisfies the Schwarz inequality
If the trace-pairing adjoint \(E^*\) has a positive definite fixed point \(\rho {\gt}0\), then \(\operatorname{Fix}(E)\) is a \(*\)-subalgebra of \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\).
In the terminology introduced immediately before [ Wol12 , Example 5.3 ] , a Schwarz map is precisely a positive unital map satisfying (35). Thus the three assumptions reproduce the source’s Schwarz-map convention. In [ Wol12 , Theorem 6.12 ] , the trace adjoint is initially assumed to have an arbitrary full-rank fixed point. The proposition on positive fixed points then produces a positive definite fixed point \(\rho \), to which the theorem above applies. The resulting explicit block form of the algebra is given in [ Wol12 , Equation (1.39) ] .
Let \(E\) be a unital Kraus map on \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) whose adjoint map \(E^*\) has a positive definite fixed point \(\rho {\gt}0\). There exist \(n\in \mathbb {N}\) and dimensions \(d_1,\ldots ,d_n\geq 1\) such that the fixed-point \(*\)-subalgebra is \(\mathbb {C}\)-algebra isomorphic to \(\operatorname{Fix}(E)\cong \prod _{k=1}^{n}M_{d_k}(\mathbb {C})\).
Let \((H,\{ L_j\} )\) be a Lindblad form. If the algebra generated by \(\{ L_j\} \) and \(\kappa \) is the entire matrix algebra \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), then the Lindblad data do not admit a block-upper-triangular decomposition.
Under the hypotheses of Theorem 13.12.1.1, the matrix
is positive semidefinite, and
This is the faithful-marginal-support form of the order-two estimate obtained from [ Bei13 , Theorem 6, Equation (18) ] .
Let \(\rho _{AB}\geq 0\), and choose an eigenbasis of its faithful first marginal \(\sigma =\operatorname{diag}(p_1,\ldots ,p_{d_A}){\gt}0\). Suppose also that the second marginal \(\tau \) is positive definite. For the supported-marginal channel \(\Phi _\rho \), set
Then
Here \(\sigma ^T=\sigma \) because the chosen basis diagonalizes \(\sigma \).
Let \(\tau \geq 0\), and let \(P\) be its support projection. Equal positive-semidefinite matrices have equal support projections, and taking the positive square root leaves \(P\) unchanged. If \(V:\mathbb C^K\to \mathbb C^J\) satisfies \(VV^\dagger =P\), then \(\sqrt{V^\dagger \tau V}=V^\dagger \sqrt\tau V\). Moreover, both \(P\tau ^{-1/2}_{\operatorname {supp}} =\tau ^{-1/2}_{\operatorname {supp}}\) and \(\tau ^{-1/2}_{\operatorname {supp}}P =\tau ^{-1/2}_{\operatorname {supp}}\). If, in addition, \(V^\dagger V=\mathbb {1}\), then
Independently, if \(W:\mathbb C^L\to \mathbb C^J\) satisfies \(W^\dagger W=\mathbb {1}\), then \(\| WZW^\dagger \| _2=\| Z\| _2\) for every \(Z\in \mathbb C^{L\times L}\).
- Matrix.PosSemidef.supportProj_congr
- Matrix.PosSemidef.supportProj_cfc_sqrt
- Matrix.PosSemidef.supportInvSqrt_mul_supportProj
- Matrix.PosSemidef.supportProj_mul_supportInvSqrt
- Matrix.PosSemidef.sqrt_compression_on_support
- Matrix.PosSemidef.supportInvSqrt_compression_on_support
- Matrix.PosSemidef.supportInvFourthRoot_compression_on_support
- Matrix.frobenius_norm_isometry_mul_mul_conjTranspose
If \(L\) is a GKSL generator, then there exist a CP map \(\phi \) and a matrix \(\kappa \) such that
If two Lindblad forms \(F,F'\) induce the same generator and both have traceless Kraus operators, then their drift matrices differ by an imaginary scalar: \(\kappa ' = \kappa +i\lambda \, \mathbb {1}\) for some \(\lambda \in \mathbb {R}\). This is part of [ Wol12 , Proposition 7.4(2) ] .
\(L\) is a GKSL generator if and only if
with \(H=H^\dagger \). This is [ Wol12 , Theorem 7.1 ] .
If \(L(\rho )=\phi (\rho )-\kappa \rho -\rho \kappa ^\dagger \) with \(\phi \) CP and \(\phi ^*(\mathbb {1})=\kappa +\kappa ^\dagger \), then \(L\) is a GKSL generator. This is [ Wol12 , Theorem 7.1, Equation (7.20) ] .
Let \(E\) be an irreducible positive map on \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) and let \(A\geq 0\) be nonzero. Then
This is the implication (1)\(\Rightarrow \)(2) in [ Wol12 , Theorem 6.2 ] . Complete positivity is not assumed.
If \(d\ge 3\) and \(\gamma {\gt}0\), then Ha’s displayed block transpose is precisely
Here \(T_2\) denotes transposition in the second tensor factor, exactly as in Ha’s block notation.
The orientation obtained from [ EK00 , equations (12)–(13), p. 137; Theorem 3.3 and the concluding shuffled pairing, pp. 138–139 ] is
If \(|\Omega _d\rangle =d^{-1/2}\sum _i e_i\otimes e_i\), then \(J_d=d|\Omega _d\rangle \! \langle \Omega _d|\), and hence
The pairing is unchanged under a simultaneous reindexing of the finite coordinates of \(A\) and of the domain and range coordinates of \(\Phi \).
Let \(d\ge 3\), \(1\le n\le d-2\), and \(\gamma {\gt}0\). For the Choi-type map \(T_C\) and Ha’s matrix \(A_\gamma \),
In particular, if \(0{\lt}\gamma {\lt}1\), the real part of each expression in (72) is strictly negative.
- Matrix.haCyclicWeight_mul_star
- Matrix.haCyclicSucc_ne
- Matrix.haBlockTransposeEntry
- Matrix.partialTransposeRight_haAGamma_apply
- Matrix.eomKyePairing_choiTypeMap_eq_coordinate_sums
- Matrix.haAGammaCyclic_correlated_entry
- Matrix.haAGammaCyclic_diag_entry
- Matrix.haAGammaCyclic_shifted_diag_entry
- Matrix.eomKyePairing_haAGamma_choiTypeMap
- Matrix.eomKyePairing_haAGamma_choiTypeMapFin
- Matrix.choiTypeMapFin_haAGamma_omegaVec_quadraticForm
- Matrix.eomKyePairing_haAGamma_choiTypeMap_re_neg
- Matrix.choiTypeMapFin_haAGamma_omegaVec_quadraticForm_re_neg
Put \(\rho _\gamma =A_\gamma ^\sigma \). For every \(d\ge 3\) and \(\gamma {\gt}0\),
Every vector \(z_{r,i}\) in (60) has Schmidt rank at most two. Consequently \(A_r\) and \(A_\gamma \) belong to the cone \(V_2\) generated by projectors onto vectors of Schmidt rank at most two; in particular, \(A_\gamma \ge 0\).
A matrix of Schmidt number at most \(n\) is positive semidefinite. States of Schmidt number at most \(n\) are closed under addition and under multiplication by a non-negative real scalar, and a bound on the Schmidt number relaxes to any larger bound.
A bipartite state on \(M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\otimes M_{k}(\mathbb {C})\) of Schmidt number at most \(n\) satisfies \((T\otimes \operatorname{id}_k)(\rho )\ge 0\) for every \(n\)-positive map \(T\colon M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{r}(\mathbb {C})\). This is the only-if direction of Wolf’s Proposition 3.4 [ Wol12 , Chapter 3, Proposition 3.4 ] , with the map output and innocent-bystander dimensions allowed to vary independently.
On \(M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\otimes M_{d'}(\mathbb {C})\), with no relation imposed between the two factors, a state of Schmidt number at most \(n\) satisfies \((T\otimes \operatorname{id})(\rho )\ge 0\) for every \(n\)-positive endomorphism \(T\) of \(M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\). This compatibility declaration is the specialization of Theorem 4.13.5 used by the reduction criterion below.
For a tripartite density matrix \(\rho _{ABC}\),
holds if and only if \(\rho _{ABC}\) admits a quantum Markov decomposition on the middle subsystem \(B\).
Let \(\rho _{ABC}\) be a tripartite density matrix satisfying
Then there are a decomposition
a unitary \(V_B\), probabilities \(p_j\), and density matrices \(\rho _{A B_j^L}\) and \(\rho _{B_j^R C}\) such that, for \(V=\mathbf1_A\otimes V_B\otimes \mathbf1_C\),
Let \(T:M_d(\mathbb {C})\to M_d(\mathbb {C})\) be complex linear. Suppose that \(T(A)\) is Hermitian whenever \(A\) is Hermitian and that
for every Hermitian \(A\). Then every Hermitian \(A\) satisfies
If \(\varepsilon {\gt}0\), then \(\lambda _0(\varepsilon ){\gt}\cdots {\gt}\lambda _{d-1}(\varepsilon )\), so the roots of \(\chi _{A_\varepsilon }\) have no repetitions. Moreover, \(A_\varepsilon \to A\) as \(\varepsilon \to 0\). In particular, the positive sequence \(\varepsilon _n=1/(n+1)\) gives simple-spectrum matrices \(A_{\varepsilon _n}\to A\). All assertions remain valid for \(d=0\).
- Matrix.IsHermitian.orderedPerturbedEigenvalue_strictAnti
- Matrix.IsHermitian.orderedPerturbedEigenvalue_injective
- Matrix.IsHermitian.simpleSpectrumPerturbation_isHermitian
- Matrix.IsHermitian.simpleSpectrumPerturbation_zero
- Matrix.IsHermitian.simpleSpectrumPerturbation_roots_nodup
- Matrix.IsHermitian.continuous_simpleSpectrumPerturbation
- Matrix.IsHermitian.tendsto_simpleSpectrumPerturbation
- Matrix.IsHermitian.tendsto_simpleSpectrumPerturbation_one_div
Let \(T:M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\) be complex linear. Suppose that
for every \(X\in M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\), and that
for every Hermitian \(A\in M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\). Then there is a unitary \(U\) such that either
for every \(X\in M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\), or
for every \(X\in M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\). This is the spectrum-preserver classification in [ Wol12 , Chapter 1, Spectrum preserving maps ] .
If \(A\) is Hermitian with eigenvalues \(\lambda _0,\ldots ,\lambda _{d-1}\), listed with multiplicity, then for every \(k\in \mathbb {N}\),
This includes \(d=0\), when both sides are empty sums.
Let \(\rho _{ABC}\) be a tripartite density matrix attaining equality in strong subadditivity. Then the ambient middle subsystem has a direct-sum tensor decomposition
In unitary coordinates adapted to this decomposition there are density matrices \(\sigma _j\) and positive, not necessarily normalized operators \(\omega _j\) such that
The tensor factors appear here in the order \(b_j^R\otimes b_j^L\), the reverse of HJPW’s \(b_j^L\otimes b_j^R\) order. Directions complementary to the minimum joint support form one-dimensional tensor sectors with zero \(\omega _j\).
This is [ HJPW04 , Theorem 6, equations (13)–(14) ] , lines 493–502.
If two operators \(X,Y\) on \(A\otimes B\) have
for every member of the finite effect family, then \(X=Y\).
Let \(\rho _{ABC}\) be a tripartite density matrix attaining equality in strong subadditivity, and put \(\rho _{AB}=\operatorname{tr}_C\rho _{ABC}\). If \(\widehat{\mathcal R}:B\to B\otimes C\) is the completed recovery channel, define
Then \(\varphi \) is trace-preserving and completely positive and
For each selected effect, let
The indices with \(p_s\neq 0\) form a finite nonempty set. For each such index, positivity of \(\xi _s\) makes \(p_s\) real and positive, and
is a density operator and \(\varphi (\mu _s)=\mu _s\). Consequently a Kraus representation of \(\varphi \) gives a single preserving operation for this finite nonempty density family.
This is the conditional-family construction in [ HJPW04 , Theorem 6, lines 493–505 ] . Effects with \(p_s=0\) are omitted before normalization; no artificial conditional state is introduced for them.
- Matrix.petzMiddleChannel
- Matrix.petzMiddleChannel_isKrausCPTP
- Matrix.idTensor_petzMiddleChannel_traceC_ABC_eq
- Matrix.ActiveConditionalEffectIndex
- Matrix.activeConditionalEffectIndex_nonempty
- Matrix.normalizedConditionalSlice
- Matrix.normalizedConditionalSlice_posSemidef
- Matrix.normalizedConditionalSlice_trace
- Matrix.map_conditionalSlice_eq_self_of_idTensorMap_eq_self
- Matrix.petzMiddleChannel_normalizedConditionalSlice
- Matrix.exists_preservingKrausFamily_normalizedConditionalSlice
Let \(\rho _{ABC}\) be a tripartite density matrix attaining equality in strong subadditivity, and let \(\mu _s\) be the finite nonempty family of normalized conditional states obtained from the active separating effects. On the minimum joint supporting subspace of this family there are tensor-product direct-sum coordinates such that
where the weights form probability distributions and all factors are density operators. The support isometry reconstructs every \(\mu _s\).
The channel
restricts to the same support and intertwines with its ambient action. In these coordinates its action on each diagonal summand is
The tensor factors are written in the reverse order from HJPW.
This is the application of HJPW Theorem 6, lines 493–505, to Properties 1 and \(2'\) from Appendix A, lines 761–816 and 853–882.
Let \(\rho _{ABC}\) be a tripartite density matrix attaining equality in strong subadditivity, and let \(V\) be the support isometry and \((e,U,\sigma _j)\) the direct-sum coordinates of Theorem 13.6.70. Put \(W=\mathbf1_A\otimes V\). Then
In the same support coordinates there are positive, not necessarily normalized operators \(\omega _j\) such that
The tensor factors are written in the reverse order from HJPW. The block equation is on the minimum joint supporting subspace; it does not assert an ambient direct-sum equivalence on subsystem \(B\).
Scope restriction (HJPW Theorem 6, equation (14)): the displayed direct sum is restricted to the minimum joint supporting subspace, whereas equation (14), lines 499–502, decomposes the ambient subsystem \(B\). This restriction is documented in the TNLean paper-gap note [ con26q ] .
Let \(\rho _{ABC}\) be a tripartite density matrix attaining equality in strong subadditivity, with the ambient decomposition
from Theorem 13.6.72. There are a finite-dimensional ancilla, a fixed pure ancilla vector, and one unitary \(U_{BCE}\) whose block-coordinate form is
On every supported sector, \(U_j\) dilates a trace-preserving completely positive map from \(b_j^R\) to \(b_j^R C\) that sends \(\sigma _j\) to a state whose \(b_j^R\) marginal is \(\sigma _j\). The resulting state is positive and has trace one. The displayed block form uses the order \(U_j\otimes \mathbf1_{b_j^L}\); in HJPW’s order it is \(\mathbf1_{b_j^L}\otimes U_j\).
The recovery operation determined by the chosen unitary agrees with the Petz recovery operation on every operator supported by the minimum joint supporting subspace, and
No equality of the two operations is asserted on the complementary ambient sectors.
This is [ HJPW04 , Theorem 6, equation (15) ] , lines 547–560, using Appendix A, Theorem 10, Property 2, lines 791–800, the equivalence with Property \(2'\) in lines 808–823, and the operation-level proof in lines 853–882.
Let \(\rho _{ABC}\) be a tripartite density matrix attaining equality in strong subadditivity, and let \(U_B\) and the factors \(\omega _j\) be those of Theorems 13.6.72 and 13.6.73. For each supported sector, put
This is a density matrix on \(\mathcal H_{b_j^R}\otimes \mathcal H_C\), where \(\widehat{\mathcal R}_j\) is the sector recovery operation. Read each middle-system summand in the HJPW order \(\mathcal H_{b_j^L}\otimes \mathcal H_{b_j^R}\), and set \(W=\mathbf1_A\otimes (U_B\otimes \mathbf1_C)\). Then
Thus every complementary block is zero, while the supported \(j\)th block, in the factor order \((A b_j^L)\otimes (b_j^R C)\), is \(\omega _j\otimes \widehat\rho _j\). The factors \(\omega _j\) remain unnormalized; no probabilities or normalized left factors are asserted.
This is the final substitution in [ HJPW04 , Theorem 6, equations (11), (14), and (15) ] , lines 562–570.
Let \(\Phi \colon M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{d'}(\mathbb {C})\) be a positive map. If some positive semidefinite matrix \(\rho \) on \(\mathbb {C}^{d}\otimes \mathbb {C}^{k}\) with the PPT property has \((\Phi \otimes \operatorname{id})(\rho )\) not positive semidefinite, then \(\Phi \) is indecomposable. The detection hypothesis alone, without positivity of \(\Phi \), still implies that \(\Phi \) is not decomposable.
Let \(E\) be a nonzero completely positive map on \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\). Then \(E\) is irreducible if and only if it has the restricted CP spectral properties of Definition 8.15.1. This is a CP-map variant of [ Wol12 , Theorem 6.4 ] : uniqueness is required only among positive semidefinite Perron eigenvectors, not on the full eigenspace. Those restricted properties are nevertheless sufficient for the irreducibility equivalence.
If \(E\) is an irreducible map and \(c \neq 0\), then \(cE\) is also irreducible. For positive real \(c\), this is the scalar completely positive case of [ Wol12 , Proposition 6.6 ] ; the abstract irreducibility statement above also allows any nonzero complex \(c\).
If \(\mathcal S:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D'}(\mathbb {C})\) is trace-preserving and completely positive, then its trace-pairing adjoint satisfies
This is the Schrödinger–Heisenberg duality of [ Wol12 , Section 1.2 ] .
Let \(U\) be any matrix on the first factor. If \(\rho \) has the PPT property then
is positive semidefinite; no invertibility or unitarity of \(U\) is required. Specializing to a unitary \(U\) this is the partial transpose taken in the basis changed by \(U\), so the positivity of the partial transpose is independent of the local basis, recovering Wolf’s basis-independence statement [ Wol12 , Equation (3.17) ] .
For \(d\ge 1\) and a separable matrix \(\rho \) on \(M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\otimes M_{d'}(\mathbb {C})\), applying the reduction map \(T_1(X)=\operatorname{tr}(X)\mathbb {1}-X\) to the first factor keeps the result positive semidefinite: \((T_1\otimes \operatorname{id})(\rho )\ge 0\). This is the separability instance of the operator inequality underlying the reduction criterion at the first level.
Let \(V:\mathbb {C}^k\to \mathbb {C}^D\) satisfy \(V^\dagger V=\mathbb {1}_k\). For every \(A\in M_{k}(\mathbb {C})\),
Let \(W:\mathbb {C}^n\to \mathbb {C}^D\) satisfy \(W^\dagger W=\mathbb {1}_n\). There are an identification \(\mathbb {C}^D\simeq \mathbb {C}^{D-n}\oplus \mathbb {C}^n\) and a unitary \(U\) on \(\mathbb {C}^D\) such that, for every \(A\in M_{n}(\mathbb {C})\),
This is [ Wol12 , Chapter 8, Equation (8.104) ] . Let \(D\ge 1\), let \(J_{D}(\lambda )=\lambda I+N\) be the Jordan block of Lemma 10.1, and write \(\| \cdot \| _{\infty }\) for the largest singular value. Then, for every \(n\in \mathbb N\) and every \(k_{0}\le \min \{ n,D-1\} \),
Assume \(d{\gt}0\). A linear map \(T:M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{d'}(\mathbb {C})\) is \(k\)-positive if and only if, for every \(X\in M_{d\times k}(\mathbb {C})\), the right-factor compression of the Choi matrix of \(T\) by \(X\) is positive semidefinite.
A linear map \(E:M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{d'}(\mathbb {C})\) is \(k\)-positive if and only if, for every vector \(\phi \in \mathbb {C}^d\otimes \mathbb {C}^k\), \(E^{(k)}(|\phi \rangle \! \langle \phi |)\ge 0\). This is the pure-state reduction used in [ Wol12 , Chapter 3, Proposition 3.1 ] .
Assume \(d{\gt}0\). If \(T:M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{d'}(\mathbb {C})\) is \(k\)-positive, then, for every \(X\in M_{d\times k}(\mathbb {C})\),
where \(\tau \) is the Choi matrix of \(T\).
Assume \(d{\gt}0\). If \(T:M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{d'}(\mathbb {C})\) is \(k\)-positive, then \(\langle \psi ,\tau _T\psi \rangle \ge 0\) for every \(\psi \in \mathbb {C}^{d'}\otimes \mathbb {C}^d\) with \(\operatorname{SR}(\psi )\le k\).
Let \(E(X) = \sum _i K_i X K_i^\dagger \) be a unital Kraus map, so that \(\sum _i K_i K_i^\dagger = \mathbb {1}\). Then, for every \(X \in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\),
This is [ Wol12 , Equation (5.2) ] .
Let \((H,\{ L_j\} )\) be a Lindblad form with \(\kappa =iH+\tfrac {1}{2}\sum _jL_j^\dagger L_j\), and let \(P\) be an orthogonal projection such that the generator preserves the compression \(PM_{D}(\mathbb {C})P\). If \((\mathbb {1}-P)L_jP=0\) for every \(j\), then \((\mathbb {1}-P)\kappa P=0\).
Let \(E:M_{D_{\rm in}}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D_{\rm out}}(\mathbb {C})\) be a \(2\)-positive complex-linear map. For every \(A,B\in M_{D_{\rm in}}(\mathbb {C})\), \(\ker (E(B^\dagger B))\subseteq \ker (E(A^\dagger B))\) as subspaces of \(\mathbb C^{D_{\rm out}}\).
Let \(E\) be an irreducible positive map on \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\). If \(\rho \geq 0\), \(\rho \neq 0\), and
then \(\rho \) is positive definite.
Let \(\rho ,\sigma \in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be density matrices with \(\sigma \) of full rank. Then the relative entropy vanishes exactly when the states coincide, \(D(\rho \Vert \sigma )=0\iff \rho =\sigma \). Together with nonnegativity, this is the order property that makes \(D\) a divergence.
Let \(\rho ,\sigma \in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be density matrices satisfying the support condition \(\ker \sigma \subseteq \ker \rho \), that is, every vector annihilated by \(\sigma \) is annihilated by \(\rho \). Then the relative entropy is non-negative, \(D(\rho \Vert \sigma )\ge 0\).
Under the hypotheses of Definition 13.6.58, there are \(L\in \mathbb {N}\), positive dimensions \(d_0,\ldots ,d_{L-1}\) and multiplicities \(m_0,\ldots ,m_{L-1}\) with \(\sum _\ell d_\ell m_\ell =D\), and a unitary \(U\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) such that a matrix \(A\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) belongs to \(A_0\) exactly when
for some matrices \(B_\ell \in M_{d_\ell }(\mathbb {C})\).
Under the hypotheses of Definition 13.6.58, there are \(L\in \mathbb {N}\), positive dimensions \(d_\ell ,m_\ell \), a unitary \(U\), and density matrices \(\sigma _\ell \in M_{m_\ell }(\mathbb {C})\) such that, for every member \(\rho _k\) of the invariant family, there are matrices \(X_{\ell ,k}\in M_{d_\ell }(\mathbb {C})\) satisfying
The density matrices \(\sigma _\ell \) and the decomposition are common to the whole family.
No positivity or trace normalization is asserted for the matrices \(X_{\ell ,k}\). Thus this is the full-support fixed-point block form underlying HJPW Appendix A, lines 853–856, not the normalized decomposition of Property 1.
Let \(\rho _1,\ldots ,\rho _K\) be density operators, without a faithfulness assumption on their average. On their minimum joint supporting subspace there is one direct-sum tensor decomposition in which
where the weights form probability distributions and all displayed factors are density operators. Every trace-preserving completely positive operation preserving the compressed family acts on each diagonal summand as
In particular, every operation preserving the original family restricts to such an operation, and its action transports back through the support isometry by the intertwining identity above. The support isometry reconstructs every original \(\rho _k\) from \(\widehat\rho _k\).
This is HJPW Properties 1 and \(2'\) after the joint-support reduction in Appendix A, lines 761–816 and 853–882. The tensor factors are written in the reverse order from HJPW.
Let \(\rho _1,\ldots ,\rho _K\) be density operators and let \(Q\) be the support projection of their average. There are an integer \(r\) and an isometry \(V:\mathbb C^r\to \mathcal H\) with \(VV^\dagger =Q\) such that the compressed states \(\widehat\rho _k=V^\dagger \rho _kV\) are density operators, their average is positive definite, and
Every trace-preserving completely positive operation preserving all \(\rho _k\) compresses along the same isometry to a trace-preserving completely positive operation \(\widehat F\) preserving all \(\widehat\rho _k\). Its ambient and compressed actions intertwine:
This is the reduction to the minimum joint supporting subspace in HJPW, Appendix A, lines 761–763.
The map \(P_0^*\) is positive, unital, and idempotent, and its range is exactly \(A_0\).
Suppose in addition that every \(\rho _k\) is positive semidefinite with trace one. Under the explicit positive-definite common-average hypothesis of Definition 13.6.58, the common decomposition of Theorem 13.6.65 admits numbers \(q_{\ell |k}\geq 0\) and density matrices \(\tau _{\ell |k}\in M_{d_\ell }(\mathbb {C})\) such that, for every \(k\),
The density matrix \(\sigma _\ell \) is independent of \(k\). The tensor factors are written in the reverse order from HJPW Property 1. This is the full-support specialization of that state decomposition. No action of a preserving operation on the summands is asserted in this theorem; the next theorem supplies it under the same full-support hypothesis.
Use the decomposition of Theorem 13.6.66. For every trace-preserving completely positive operation \(F\) satisfying \(F(\rho _k)=\rho _k\) for all \(k\), and every summand \(\ell \), there is a trace-preserving completely positive operation \(F_\ell \) on \(M_{m_\ell }(\mathbb {C})\) such that \(F_\ell (\sigma _\ell )=\sigma _\ell \). If \(\iota _\ell \) denotes inclusion of the \(\ell \)-th diagonal summand and
then, for all \(A\in M_{m_\ell }(\mathbb {C})\) and \(B\in M_{d_\ell }(\mathbb {C})\),
This is the full-support specialization of HJPW Property \(2'\) (Appendix A, lines 808–816 and 860–882), with the tensor factors reversed. It does not include the joint-support reduction or the Stinespring form of Property 2.
Let \(H\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be Hermitian and let \(A\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) satisfy \(HA=AH^{T}\) and \(A^{T}=-A\). If \(|\psi \rangle \neq 0\) satisfies \(H|\psi \rangle =\lambda |\psi \rangle \) and the partner does not vanish, \(A|\overline\psi \rangle \neq 0\), then the eigenspace of \(\lambda \) has dimension at least two.
Suppose \(H_q(K,\varphi )=\mathbb {C}^D\) for every nonzero \(\varphi \). If \(p{\gt}0\) and \(\rho ,\sigma \) are nonzero positive-semidefinite fixed points of \(\mathcal{E}_K^p\), then \(\sigma =c\rho \) for some \(c\in \mathbb {C}\).
If \(\Phi (X)=\sum _iA_iXA_i^\dagger \) is a rectangular Kraus completely positive map, then \(\Phi \otimes \operatorname{id}_j\) is a Kraus completely positive map with Kraus operators \(A_i\otimes \mathbb 1_j\). In particular, \((\Phi \otimes \operatorname{id}_j)(X)\) is positive semidefinite whenever \(X\) is.
Let \(K=\{ K^i\} _{i=0}^{d-1}\) be a finite family of \(D\times D\) matrices, where \(D{\gt}0\), and let \(\varphi \neq 0\). If, for some \(N\), words in \(K\) of length at most \(N\) span \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), then the vectors \(K^w\varphi \) with \(|w|\leq D-1\) span \(\mathbb {C}^D\).
For every choice of \(d\), \(D\), and \(K\) as above and every \(q\ge 0\), suppose \(H_q(K,\varphi )=\mathbb {C}^D\) for every nonzero \(\varphi \). Then every nonzero positive-semidefinite fixed point of \(\mathcal{E}_K\) is positive definite.
Let \(\rho \geq 0\) be fixed by the Kraus map of a finite matrix family \(K\), and let \(Q\) be the support projection of \(\rho \). Then \(Q\) is an orthogonal projection and
for every \(i\).
Let \(K\) be a finite matrix family with Kraus map \(E\), and let \(Q\) be an orthogonal projection. If
for every \(X\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), then \((\mathbb {1}-Q)K_iQ=0\) for every \(i\).
Let \(\{ B_\alpha \} _{\alpha \in \iota _1}\) and \(\{ A_j\} _{j \in \iota _2}\) be finite Kraus families with \(|\iota _2| \le |\iota _1|\). Then the following are equivalent:
\(\sum _\alpha B_\alpha X B_\alpha ^\dagger = \sum _j A_j X A_j^\dagger \) for all \(X \in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\).
There exists a matrix \(V = (V_{\alpha j})\) with \(V^\dagger V = \mathbb {1}\) such that \(B_\alpha = \sum _j V_{\alpha j} A_j\) for every \(\alpha \).
Let \(\tau _{E^m}\) be the normalized Choi matrix of the \(m\)-fold iterate of \(E\). Then
For every choice of \(d\), \(D\), and \(K\) as above, every \(q\ge 0\), and every \(\varphi \in \mathbb {C}^D\),
Let \(K\) be a finite matrix family with Kraus map \(E\), and let \(Q\) be an orthogonal projection. If \((\mathbb {1}-Q)K_iQ=0\) for every \(i\), then
for every \(X\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\).
Let \(I\) be finite, let \((K_i)_{i\in I}\) be a family in \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), and set \(E(X)=\sum _i K_iXK_i^\dagger \). For every non-negative integer \(N\),
For \(N=0\), the product is the identity matrix.
Suppose that
Every eigenvalue \(\mu \) of \(\mathcal M_{A,B}\) satisfies \(|\mu |\leq 1\).
Let \(\{ K_i\} _{i=0}^{d-1}\) be a family with \(D {\gt} 0\) and some \(K_i \neq 0\), whose Kraus map \(\mathcal K_K\) is irreducible. Then there exist a positive definite matrix \(\sigma \) and a positive real \(r {\gt} 0\) such that
This combines the eigenvector-existence part of [ Wol12 , Theorem 6.5 ] with the irreducible upgrade to positive definiteness ( [ Wol12 , Theorem 6.3(2) ] ).
Let \(D{\gt}0\), and let \(K=\{ K^i\} _{i=0}^{d-1}\) be a finite family of \(D\times D\) matrices satisfying
Suppose there is a common length \(q\ge 0\) such that \(H_q(K,\varphi )=\mathbb {C}^D\) for every nonzero \(\varphi \in \mathbb {C}^D\). Then there is a positive-definite matrix \(\rho \) such that \(\mathcal{E}_K(\rho )=\rho \).
For every choice of \(d\), \(D\), and \(K\) as above and every \(q\ge 0\), suppose \(H_q(K,\varphi )=\mathbb {C}^D\) for every nonzero \(\varphi \). Then \(\mathcal{E}_K^q(\rho ){\gt}0\) for every nonzero positive-semidefinite matrix \(\rho \).
For every choice of \(d\), \(D\), and \(K\) as above and every \(q\ge 0\), suppose \(H_q(K,\varphi )=\mathbb {C}^D\) for every nonzero \(\varphi \). For every \(p{\gt}0\), each nonzero positive-semidefinite fixed point of \(\mathcal{E}_K^p\) is positive definite.
Let \(D{\gt}0\), and let \(K=\{ K^i\} _{i=0}^{d-1}\) be a finite family of \(D\times D\) matrices satisfying
Suppose there is a common length \(q\ge 0\) such that \(H_q(K,\varphi )=\mathbb {C}^D\) for every nonzero \(\varphi \in \mathbb {C}^D\). Then the Kraus map \(\mathcal{E}_K\) is primitive: it has a nonzero fixed point and \(1\) is its only peripheral eigenvalue.
Suppose that \(K\) is trace preserving and that its Kraus map \(E\) is irreducible with peripheral spectrum \(\{ 1\} \). This is the implication from item 1 to items 3 and 4 of [ Wol12 , Theorem 6.8(1,3,4) ] . Then, for every sufficiently large \(m\),
Moreover,
For every choice of \(d\), \(D\), and \(K\) as above and every \(q\ge 0\), suppose \(H_q(K,\varphi )=\mathbb {C}^D\) for every nonzero \(\varphi \in \mathbb {C}^D\). Then \(\mathcal{E}_K^q(|\varphi \rangle \! \langle \varphi |){\gt}0\) for every \(\varphi \neq 0\).
Two sets of Kraus operators \(\{ K_j\} \) and \(\{ \widetilde{K}_\ell \} \) represent the same completely positive map if and only if there is a unitary \(U\) with \(K_j=\sum _\ell U_{j\ell }\widetilde{K}_\ell \), where the smaller set is padded with zero operators; equivalently, after padding, the families are related by an isometry \(V\) with \(V^\dagger V=\mathbb {1}\). This is item 4 of [ Wol12 , Theorem 2.1 ] .
Let \(T(X)=\sum _{j=1}^{r}K_jXK_j^\dagger \) with \(K_j\in M_{d'\times d}(\mathbb {C})\). Then \(T\) is trace preserving if and only if \(\sum _j K_j^\dagger K_j=\mathbb {1}_d\), and unital if and only if \(\sum _j K_jK_j^\dagger =\mathbb {1}_{d'}\). This is item 1 of [ Wol12 , Theorem 2.1 ] .
Every completely positive map \(T:M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{d'}(\mathbb {C})\) admits a Kraus representation with \(r=\operatorname {rank}(\tau )\) Hilbert–Schmidt orthogonal Kraus operators, \(\operatorname{tr}[K_i^\dagger K_j]\propto \delta _{ij}\); the off-diagonal traces vanish and the diagonal traces are nonzero. This is item 3 of [ Wol12 , Theorem 2.1 ] .
If \(\sum _\alpha B_\alpha X B_\alpha ^\dagger = \sum _j A_j X A_j^\dagger \) for all \(X\) and \(r_2 \le r_1\) (where \(\{ B_\alpha \} _{\alpha =0}^{r_1-1}\) is the larger family and \(\{ A_j\} _{j=0}^{r_2-1}\) the smaller), then there exists a rectangular isometry \(V\) (\(r_1 \times r_2\), \(V^\dagger V = \mathbb {1}_{r_2}\)) such that \(B_\alpha = \sum _j V_{\alpha j}\, A_j\).
Let \(W\) be an isometry between two Kraus index spaces, so \(W^\dagger W = \mathbb {1}\). If \(K_j = \sum _\ell W_{j\ell } \widetilde K_\ell \), then the Kraus families \(\{ K_j\} \) and \(\{ \widetilde K_\ell \} \) define the same completely positive map.
Let \(U\) be a unitary \(r \times r\) matrix (\(U^\dagger U = \mathbb {1}\)) and suppose \(K_j = \sum _\ell U_{j\ell } \tilde{K}_\ell \). Then \(\{ K_j\} \) and \(\{ \tilde{K}_\ell \} \) define the same Kraus map: for every \(X \in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\),
Let \(\{ K_i\} _{i=0}^{d-1}\) be matrices in \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) with \(\sum _{i=0}^{d-1}K_i^\dagger K_i=\mathbb {1}\), and let
be the associated Kraus map. Every eigenvalue \(\mu \) of \(\mathcal K_K\) satisfies \(|\mu | \le 1\). This is the trace-preserving specialization of [ Wol12 , Proposition 6.1 ] .
Let \(\{ K_i\} _{i=0}^{d-1}\) be a finite Kraus family and let \(\rho \) be positive definite with \(\sum _i K_i^\dagger \rho K_i = \rho \). Define the gauged family \(B_i = \rho ^{1/2} K_i \rho ^{-1/2}\). Then \(B\) is trace-preserving: \(\sum _i B_i^\dagger B_i = \mathbb {1}\).
Let \(\{ K_i\} _{i=0}^{d-1}\) be a trace-preserving Kraus family on \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\). The spectral radius of its Kraus map \(\mathcal K_K\) is at most \(1\).
Let \(E:\mathbb C^{I\times I}\to \mathbb C^{J\times J}\) be a completely positive map with a Kraus representation, and let \(E^*\) be its trace-pairing adjoint. Then the Hilbert-space adjoint of \(\widehat E\) is
This is the adjoint identity used in the direct exponent-two specialization of [ Bei13 , Theorem 6, Equation (18) ] .
Let \(\{ K_j\} _{j=0}^{r-1}\) and \(\{ K'_j\} _{j=0}^{r-1}\) be two Hilbert–Schmidt orthonormal Kraus families, and suppose \(K_j = \sum _{\ell =0}^{r-1} U_{j\ell }\, K'_\ell \). Then the transition matrix \(U\) is unitary: \(U^\dagger U = \mathbb {1}_r\).
Let \(\{ B_\alpha \} _{\alpha \in \iota }\) and \(\{ A_j\} _{j \in \iota }\) be two Kraus families with the same finite index set. Then the following are equivalent:
\(\sum _\alpha B_\alpha X B_\alpha ^\dagger = \sum _j A_j X A_j^\dagger \) for all \(X \in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\).
There exists a unitary matrix \(U = (U_{\alpha j})\) such that \(B_\alpha = \sum _j U_{\alpha j} A_j\) for every \(\alpha \).
Let \(K\) be trace preserving. If \(S_N(K)=M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) and \(m\geq N\), then \(S_m(K)=M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\). Consequently, eventual fullness is equivalent to the existence of a positive \(N\) such that \(S_N(K)=M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\).
Let \(E^*\) be the adjoint of a trace-preserving Kraus map. If \(A\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) admits a positive semidefinite dominant \(B\) commuting with \(A\) and satisfying \(A^\dagger A\le B\), then
For a unital Kraus map \(E\), the Kadison–Schwarz gap decomposes as
Let \(E^*(X)=\sum _i K_i^\dagger X K_i\) be the adjoint Kraus map of a trace-preserving Kraus family, and let \(A\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be normal. Then the Schwarz gap
is positive semidefinite. Equivalently,
This is the completely positive case of [ Wol12 , Proposition 5.1 ] .
Let \(E\) be a Kraus map that is both unital and trace-preserving. If \(E(X) = \mu X\) with \(|\mu | = 1\), then the Kadison–Schwarz gap vanishes:
Let \(A\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be Hermitian and \(0\le k{\lt}D\). Then the sum of its \(k\) largest eigenvalues is the largest value of \(\operatorname{Re}\operatorname{tr}(PA)\) attained by an orthogonal projection \(P\) of rank \(k\):
This is Ky Fan’s maximum principle [ Fan49 ] ; see also [ Bha97 , Problem I.6.15, Exercise II.1.13 ] . For a positive semidefinite \(A\), where \(S_k(A)\) coincides with the Ky-Fan norm \(\| A\| _{(k)}\), it gives the extremal overlap of [ Wol12 , Lemma 3.1 ] .
Let \(\sigma \) be a fixed point of the adjoint transfer map \(\sum _i (A^i)^\dagger \sigma A^i = \sigma \), and let \(S\) be invertible with \(S^\dagger S = \sigma \). Define \(A'^i = SA^iS^{-1}\). Then \(\sum _i (A'^i)^\dagger A'^i = \mathbb {1}\), i.e. the gauged Kraus map is trace-preserving. This is the left-canonical normalization.
For \(s\in [0,1]\), any matrix \(K\), and positive-definite matrices \(A_1,A_2,B_1,B_2\), write \(F_s(A,B):=\Re \operatorname{tr}(K^\dagger A^s K B^{1-s})\). This map is jointly concave. For \(t\in [0,1]\), set \(A_t:=tA_1+(1-t)A_2\) and \(B_t:=tB_1+(1-t)B_2\). Then
See [ Lie73 ; And79 ] . This statement is the positive-definite, boundary-exponent (\(x+y=1\)) case of the Ando–Lieb theorem [ Wol12 , Theorem 5.15 ] , which holds for positive semidefinite \(A,B\) and all exponents \(x,y\ge 0\) with \(x+y\le 1\).
For \(s\in [0,1]\), any matrix \(K\), and positive-semidefinite matrices \(A_1,A_2,B_1,B_2\), the map \((A,B)\mapsto \Re \operatorname{tr}(K^\dagger A^s K B^{1-s})\) is jointly concave, satisfying (8) of Theorem 7.7.10. This is the full Ando–Lieb theorem [ Wol12 , Theorem 5.15 ] on the boundary line \(x+y=1\) (with \(x=s\), \(y=1-s\)): the positive-definiteness restriction of Theorem 7.7.10 is lifted. The general two-exponent region is obtained in Theorem 7.7.12.
Let \(x,y\ge 0\) with \(x+y\le 1\). For any matrix \(K\) and positive-semidefinite matrices \(A_1,A_2,B_1,B_2\), write \(F_{x,y}(A,B):=\Re \operatorname{tr}(K^\dagger A^x K B^y)\). This map is jointly concave. For \(t\in [0,1]\), set \(A_t:=tA_1+(1-t)A_2\) and \(B_t:=tB_1+(1-t)B_2\). Then
This is Wolf’s Theorem 5.15 in the finite-dimensional matrix setting.
A Lindblad form with Hamiltonian \(H\) and operators \(\{ L_j\} \) defines the same linear map as the generator decomposition \((\phi ,\kappa )\) with \(\phi (\rho ) = \sum _j L_j\rho L_j^\dagger \) and \(\kappa = iH + \frac{1}{2}\sum _j L_j^\dagger L_j\). This is [ Wol12 , Equation (7.24) ] .
Let \(T : M_{D}(\mathbb {C}) \to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be linear. If \(T(|v\rangle \! \langle v|) = |v\rangle \! \langle v|\) for every \(v \in \mathbb {C}^D\), then \(T = \operatorname{id}\). In particular, a quantum channel preserving every pure state equals the identity.
If \(\{ \sigma _i\} \) is trace-self-dual, then every linear map \(T : M_{D}(\mathbb {C}) \to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) admits the expansion
Put \(q_i=p_i^2\) for the Pauli coefficients in [ VV02 , Theorem 8, Eq. (18) ] , specialized to \(A=B=\mathbb {1}\). Direct conjugation of the Pauli basis gives
Thus, in Wolf’s Pauli-transfer convention, the four candidate Bell weights are
Verstraete–Verschelde instead print \(1-s_1-s_2-s_3\geq 0\) in Theorem 8. Their preceding Equation (16) uses \(R_\Phi \) as the Bloch transfer matrix, so the identity channel has \(R_\Phi =\operatorname {diag}(1,1,1,1)\) and violates the printed inequality. The all-minus sign is therefore inconsistent with their own convention; it is not used in this construction and no silent change of the parameter \(s_3\) is made. They sum to one. If every \(q_i\) is nonnegative, put \(p_i=\sqrt{q_i}\). Then the source family \(\{ p_0\sigma _0,p_1\sigma _1,p_2\sigma _2,p_3\sigma _3\} \) from [ VV02 , Theorem 8, Eq. (18) ] , specialized to \(A=B=\mathbb {1}\), defines a bistochastic channel whose Pauli transfer matrix is \(\operatorname {diag}(1,s_1,s_2,s_3)\). Its Choi rank is exactly \(\# \{ i\mid q_i\ne 0\} \), so all diagonal rank-drop boundaries are retained. Simultaneous nonnegativity of the four weights is equivalent to nonnegativity of their four displayed numerators. This construction shows that those inequalities suffice for the displayed Pauli family to be a channel; it makes no converse assertion for a separately specified diagonal map. Under the ordered convention \(1\geq s_1\geq s_2\geq \lvert s_3\rvert \), Wolf’s \(s_1+s_2\leq 1+s_3\) from Equation (2.40) implies all four.
For every \(x\in [0,1]\), the three Kraus operators displayed in [ VV02 , Theorem 8, Eq. (19) ] define the non-diagonal representative
Its Choi rank, equivalently its minimal Kraus rank, is \(3\) when \(x{\lt}1\) and \(2\) when \(x=1\). The third normal form in [ VV02 , Theorem 8, Eq. (17) ] is the singular trace-to-state channel
it has \(\Delta =0\), \(v=(0,0,1)\), and Choi/Kraus rank \(2\).
These are constructions and rank calculations for the representatives in [ VV02 , Theorem 8, Eqs. (17)–(19) ] . The diagonal rank formula is the direct Bell-family calculation from Equation (18). The non-diagonal and singular rank statements agree with cases 2 and 3 of [ WC08 , Theorem 18 ] . This does not prove the Lorentz-orbit classification or derive that the non-diagonal parameter must lie in \([0,1]\). The normalized Choi convention is \(\tau =\frac14\sum _{ij}\widehat T_{ij}\sigma _i\otimes \sigma _j^{\mathsf T}\); hence its raw Pauli correlation matrix satisfies \(R_{\mathrm{raw}}(\tau )=\widehat T\operatorname {diag}(1,1,-1,1)\) because \(\sigma _2^{\mathsf T}=-\sigma _2\). Verstraete–Verschelde define \(R_\Phi \) only after taking the first-factor partial transpose of their dual state and then use it as the Bloch transfer matrix. Thus \(R_\Phi \) corresponds to \(\widehat T\), not to \(R_{\mathrm{raw}}(\tau )\); the displayed sign matrix is the explicit bridge. In particular, the partial-transpose sign has already been absorbed before their Theorem 8 parameters are introduced and cannot account for its printed all-minus constraint.
- Wolf.diagonalBellWeight
- Wolf.diagonalPauliEigenvalue
- Wolf.diagonalKrausCoefficient
- Wolf.diagonalKraus
- Wolf.diagonalMap
- Wolf.sum_diagonalBellWeight
- Wolf.diagonalBellWeight_nonneg_iff
- Wolf.diagonalBellWeight_nonneg_of_ordered
- Wolf.diagonalKraus_isTP
- Wolf.diagonalMap_isChannel
- Wolf.diagonalMap_pauli
- Wolf.pauliTransferMatrix_diagonalMap
- Wolf.isLorentzDiagonal_diagonalMap
- Wolf.choiRank_diagonalMap
- Wolf.nonDiagonalKrausBase
- Wolf.nonDiagonalKrausCoefficient
- Wolf.nonDiagonalKraus
- Wolf.nonDiagonalMap
- Wolf.nonDiagonalKraus_isTP
- Wolf.nonDiagonalMap_isChannel
- Wolf.nonDiagonalMap_apply
- Wolf.pauliTransferMatrix_nonDiagonalMap
- Wolf.isLorentzNonDiagonal_nonDiagonalMap
- Wolf.choiRank_nonDiagonalMap_eq_three
- Wolf.nonDiagonalBoundaryKraus
- Wolf.nonDiagonalKraus_one_one
- Wolf.nonDiagonalMap_one_eq_boundaryMap
- Wolf.choiRank_nonDiagonalMap_one
- Wolf.singularKraus
- Wolf.singularMap
- Wolf.singularKraus_isTP
- Wolf.singularMap_isChannel
- Wolf.singularMap_apply
- Wolf.pauliTransferMatrix_singularMap
- Wolf.isLorentzSingular_singularMap
- Wolf.choiRank_singularMap
For every qubit channel \(T : M_{2}(\mathbb {C}) \to M_{2}(\mathbb {C})\), there exist invertible completely positive maps \(\Phi _{1},\Phi _{2}\), both of Kraus rank one, such that the filtered channel \(T'=\Phi _{2}\circ T\circ \Phi _{1}\) is in one of the three Lorentz normal forms: diagonal, non-diagonal, or singular. These general filters include scalar freedom and are not restricted to determinant-one \(\operatorname{SL}(2,\mathbb {C})\) filterings. Indeed, writing \(X_i=c_iS_i\) with \(S_i\in \operatorname{SL}(2,\mathbb {C})\) separates the Lorentz action from the positive map scalar \(|c_1c_2|^2\); only the latter can normalize the resulting representative to a channel. A proof still requires this scalar normalization and the classification of Lorentz orbits. The displayed diagonal, non-diagonal, and singular representatives and their ranks are already supplied by Theorem 3.15.1.28.
Under the same assumptions, \(\rho (P_L\otimes \mathbb {1}_R)=\rho \). For \(H_L=H_A\otimes H_X\) and \(H_R=H_B\), the two absorption identities are precisely the \(P_{AX}\) support-projector identities in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix D.2, lines 2228–2235 ] .
For every unital \(*\)-subalgebra \(\mathcal B\subseteq M_{n}(\mathbb {C})\), there is a trace-preserving completely positive map \(E:M_{n}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{n}(\mathbb {C})\) that is a conditional expectation onto \(\mathcal B\): it is unital and idempotent, its range lies in \(\mathcal B\), and it fixes every element of \(\mathcal B\). This is the normalized trace-preserving choice in the family described by [ Wol12 , Proposition 1.5 and Equation (1.40) ] .
For each \(k\in \mathbb {N}\), the function \(A\mapsto \operatorname{tr}(A^k)\) on \(M_d(\mathbb {C})\) is continuous. Thus \(A_n\to A\) implies \(\operatorname{tr}(A_n^k)\to \operatorname{tr}(A^k)\).
Let \(\phi \in \mathbb {C}^{D}\otimes \mathbb {C}^k\) be a normalized vector with reduced density matrix \(\rho =\operatorname{tr}_2|\phi \rangle \! \langle \phi |\) on the first factor, and let \(1\le n{\lt}D\). The largest squared overlap \(|\langle \phi | \psi \rangle |^2\) attained by a normalized vector \(\psi \) of Schmidt rank at most \(n\) is the Ky-Fan \(n\)-norm of \(\rho \):
Because \(\rho \) is positive semidefinite, this norm is the sum of its \(n\) largest eigenvalues, which coincide there with its singular values. This is [ Wol12 , Lemma 3.1 ] for \(1\le n{\lt}D\); the top index \(n=D\), where the value is \(\operatorname{tr}\rho =1\), is Theorem 4.2.2.4.
At the top index \(n=D\), the Schmidt-rank constraint \(\operatorname{SR}(\psi )\le D\) is vacuous, so the largest squared overlap is the Ky-Fan \(D\)-norm of \(\rho \):
The maximum is attained at \(\psi =\phi \). The Ky-Fan \(D\)-norm sums all eigenvalues, so for a normalized \(\phi \) it reduces to \(\| \rho \| _{(D)}=\operatorname{tr}\rho =1\). Together with Theorem 4.2.2.3, this covers the full range \(1\le n\le D\) of [ Wol12 , Lemma 3.1 ] .
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be positive and trace preserving, and suppose that \(T^*\) satisfies the Schwarz inequality. Set \(\rho _0=T_\infty (\mathbb {1})\), and let \(V:\mathcal H\to \mathbb {C}^D\) be an isometry onto the support of \(\rho _0\). Then \(\widetilde T(Y)=V^*T(VYV^*)V\) has a positive definite fixed point. Moreover, \(T(B)=B\) if and only if there is a fixed point \(Y\) of \(\widetilde T\) such that \(B=VYV^*\). There are positive integers \(d_k,m_k\), a unitary \(U\) on \(\mathcal H\), and positive definite density matrices \(\sigma _k\in M_{m_k}(\mathbb {C})\) such that
This is the maximal-support application of the full-support step in the proof of [ Wol12 , Theorem 6.14 ] . This intermediate theorem does not itself transport the displayed decomposition back to the original space and adjoin the complementary zero summand; that final step is Theorem 10.9.6.
Let \(\rho \) and \(\rho _1\) be two density operators acting on the same space and let \(c{\gt}0\). There is a convex decomposition of the form \(\rho =\sum _i\lambda _i\rho _i\) with \(\rho _1\) carrying weight \(c\) iff \(\ker (\rho )\subseteq \ker (\rho _1)\) and
where the inverse is taken on the range of \(\rho \). Wolf’s Proposition “Maximal weight in convex decomposition” [ Wol12 ] states this with the inverse form \(c\le \| \rho ^{-1/2}\rho _1 \rho ^{-1/2}\| _\infty ^{-1}\); the two are equivalent here because the kernel inclusion together with \(\operatorname{tr}(\rho _1)=1\) (so \(\rho _1\ne 0\)) forces \(\| \rho ^{-1/2}\rho _1\rho ^{-1/2}\| _\infty {\gt}0\), so dividing the displayed multiplicative inequality through by that norm is valid.
For \(d_C\ge 1\), the matrix \(\tau _C=d_C^{-1}\mathbb {1}_C\) is positive definite and has trace one.
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be positive and trace-preserving, and let \(T_\infty \) be its mean-ergodic projection. Then \(\rho _0=T_\infty (\mathbb {1})\) is positive semidefinite and fixed by \(T\). With \(Q_0\) the support projection of \(\rho _0\), every fixed point \(X\) of \(T\) satisfies \(Q_0XQ_0=X\). This is the maximal-support property of fixed points in Section 6.4 of [ Wol12 ] .
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be positive and have bounded orbits, and let \(T_\infty \) be its mean-ergodic projection. Then \(\rho _0=T_\infty (\mathbb {1})\) is positive semidefinite and fixed by \(T\). If \(Q_0\) is the support projection of \(\rho _0\), then every fixed point \(X\) of \(T\) satisfies \(Q_0XQ_0=X\). This is the bounded-orbit form of the maximal-support argument underlying [ Wol12 , Proposition 6.9 ] .
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be positive and trace preserving, and let \(\rho \succeq 0\) be a fixed point of \(T\) whose rank bounds the rank of every fixed-point density matrix: \(\operatorname{rank}\sigma \leq \operatorname{rank}\rho \) for every \(\sigma \succeq 0\) with \(\operatorname{tr}(\sigma )=1\) and \(T(\sigma )=\sigma \). Then the support projection \(Q\) of \(\rho \) satisfies \(QXQ=X\) for every fixed point \(X\) of \(T\).
Let \(T(X)=\sum _iK_iXK_i^\dagger \) be trace-preserving. There is a positive semidefinite fixed point \(\rho _0\) of \(T\) such that every fixed point \(X\) of \(T\) arises as \(X=\sqrt{\rho _0}\, Y\sqrt{\rho _0}\) for a corner-supported \(Y\) with \(\sqrt{\rho _0}\, Y\sqrt{\rho _0}\) fixed by \(T\).
Let \(E\) be a unital Kraus map. Then
Together these are the Kraus-map specialization of Theorem 6.8.1.3.
Let \(V\) be finite-dimensional and let \(f:V\to V\) have bounded orbits. For every \(x\in V\), the Cesàro averages satisfy
Moreover,
and \(P_fx=x\) if and only if \(fx=x\). The complex matrix specialization underlying [ Wol12 , Equation (6.14) ] is given below.
- LinearMap.HasBoundedOrbits.tendsto_birkhoffAverage_meanErgodicProjection
- LinearMap.HasBoundedOrbits.range_meanErgodicProjection
- LinearMap.HasBoundedOrbits.meanErgodicProjection_apply_eq_self_iff
- LinearMap.HasBoundedOrbits.isIdempotentElem_meanErgodicProjection
- LinearMap.HasBoundedOrbits.meanErgodicProjection_apply_meanErgodicProjection
- LinearMap.HasBoundedOrbits.comp_meanErgodicProjection
- LinearMap.HasBoundedOrbits.meanErgodicProjection_comp
Under the hypotheses of Theorem 10.8.15, the mean-ergodic projection of \(T\) satisfies
Consequently,
Here each summand is written on \(\mathbb {C}^{m_k}\otimes \mathbb {C}^{d_k}\), so \(\operatorname{tr}_{m_k}\) traces the first factor. This is the full-support part of Equation (6.63) in [ Wol12 , Theorem 6.14 ] ; the density matrices are not yet asserted to be positive definite.
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be a positive trace-preserving linear map whose trace adjoint \(T^*\) satisfies the Schwarz inequality. If \(T\) has a positive definite fixed point \(\rho {\gt}0\), then the trace adjoint of the mean-ergodic projection of \(T\) is a conditional expectation onto the fixed-point star-subalgebra of \(T^*\). This is the conditional-expectation step used in the proof of Wolf Theorem 6.14.
Suppose that for every \(k\) the sectorwise Kraus family resolves the identity, \(\sum _a A_{k,a}^\dagger A_{k,a}=I_{H_k}\). Then the orthogonally controlled map \(\mathcal C\) is trace-preserving and completely positive.
Let \((P_s)_{s\in I}\) be a finite family of orthogonal projections on \(H\) such that \(\sum _sP_s=I_H\). For each \(s\), let \(\Phi _s:\operatorname{End}_{\mathbb {C}}(H)\to \operatorname{End}_{\mathbb {C}}(K)\) be trace-preserving and completely positive. Then
is trace-preserving and completely positive.
Let \(H\) and \(K\) be finite-dimensional complex vector spaces, and let \(V:H\to K\) satisfy \(V^\dagger V=I_H\). Then the map
is trace-preserving and completely positive. This is the general one-isometry form of the local basis change used in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1439 and 1520 ] .
Let \(A\) and \(B\) be positive semidefinite, with \(P_A\) and \(P_B\) the orthogonal projections onto their respective ranges. Then
Here the logarithm is extended by zero on the kernel. Neither matrix is required to be positive definite, and either index set may be empty. This auxiliary identity is project-derived rather than a theorem of CPSV16.
Let \(A\) and \(B\) be positive semidefinite, and let \(f\colon \mathbb {R}\to \mathbb {R}\) be multiplicative on the non-negative reals. Then
Let \(\rho _{AB}\) be a bipartite density operator and let \(\Phi _A\) and \(\Psi _B\) be trace-preserving completely positive maps whose input and output matrix algebras may have different dimensions. Then \(I(A':B')_{(\Phi _A\otimes \Psi _B)(\rho )}\leq I(A:B)_\rho \).
Let \(\rho _{AB}\) be a bipartite density operator and let \(\Phi _A\) be a trace-preserving completely positive map whose input and output matrix algebras may have different dimensions. Then \(I(A':B)_{(\Phi _A\otimes \operatorname{id}_B)(\rho )}\leq I(A:B)_\rho \).
Let \(\rho _{AB}\) be a bipartite density operator and let \(\Psi _B\) be a trace-preserving completely positive map whose input and output matrix algebras may have different dimensions. Then \(I(A:B')_{(\operatorname{id}_A\otimes \Psi _B)(\rho )}\leq I(A:B)_\rho \).
Let \(\rho _{AB}\succeq 0\) be a finite-dimensional bipartite operator with \(\operatorname{tr}\rho _{AB}=1\). Then
No positive-dimension or faithful-marginal hypothesis is required. The operator-Schmidt rank is the ordinary operator-Schmidt rank.
For any tripartite density matrix \(\rho _{ABC}\) on \(A \otimes B \otimes C\),
where the left-hand side is the bipartite mutual information of the reduced state \(\rho _{AB} = \operatorname{tr}_C(\rho _{ABC})\) and the right-hand side is evaluated by expanding \(I(A{:}BC) = S(\rho _A) + S(\rho _{BC}) - S(\rho _{ABC})\).
Let \(V:\mathbb {C}^D\to \mathbb {C}^D\otimes \mathbb {C}^n\) satisfy \(V^\dagger P_iV=E_i\) for the canonical projectors \(P_i=\mathbb {1}_D\otimes |i\rangle \! \langle i|\). Then there exists an isometry \(W\) on the dilated space such that \(V=WV_0\), where \(V_0\) is the canonical Naimark isometry of \(\{ E_i\} \).
The Naimark projectors satisfy
If \(A, B \in M_{n}(\mathbb {C})\) satisfy \(\operatorname{tr}(A^k) = \operatorname{tr}(B^k)\) for all \(k \ge 1\), then \(A\) and \(B\) have the same characteristic polynomial. It is enough to assume this equality for \(1 \le k \le n\).
Under the hypotheses of Theorem 3.3.2 there is, for every \(\alpha \), a constant \(c_\alpha \geq 0\) with \(\operatorname{tr}[T_\alpha (\rho )]=c_\alpha \) for every \(\rho \) of unit trace. The probability of the outcome \(\alpha \) therefore does not depend on the input, so no information is gained.
Let \(d\geq 1\) and let \(\{ T_\alpha :M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\} \) be a finite family of completely positive maps with \(\sum _\alpha T_\alpha =\operatorname{id}\). Then for every \(\alpha \) there is a constant \(c_\alpha \geq 0\) with \(T_\alpha =c_\alpha \operatorname{id}\).
For \(s \in [0,t]\), \(M = \sup _{u \in [0,t]}\| e^{uL}\| \), and \(M' = \sup _{u \in [0,t]}\| e^{uL'}\| \),
For \(d,d'\geq 1\), the normalized decomposable witnesses are precisely the trace-one section of the cone in Equation (3.15). This set is compact and convex.
- Matrix.partialTransposeLeft_smul
- Matrix.continuous_partialTransposeLeft
- Matrix.PosSemidef.hasSchmidtNumberLE_left
- Matrix.isCompact_setOf_posSemidef_trace_one
- Matrix.isCompact_setOf_isNormalizedDecomposableWitness
- Matrix.isNormalizedDecomposableWitness_iff
- Matrix.convex_setOf_isNormalizedDecomposableWitness
Let \(d,d'\geq 1\), and let \(W\) be a Hermitian operator on \(\mathbb {C}^d\otimes \mathbb {C}^{d'}\) such that \(\operatorname{tr}(W)=1\), \(W\) is not decomposable, and
Then there is a PPT entangled density operator on \(\mathbb {C}^d\otimes \mathbb {C}^{d'}\).
Let \(d,d'\geq 1\), and let \(W\) be a Hermitian operator on \(\mathbb {C}^d\otimes \mathbb {C}^{d'}\) such that \(\operatorname{tr}(W)=1\) and \(W\) is not decomposable. Then there is an operator \(R\) such that
Let \(\rho \) be a trace-one Hermitian bipartite state. Then the Schmidt number of \(\rho \) exceeds \(n\) if and only if there is a Hermitian operator \(W\) such that, for every \(\psi \) of Schmidt rank at most \(n\),
This is the corrected form of Wolf’s Proposition 3.3 [ Wol12 , Chapter 3, Proposition 3.3 ] : a state has Schmidt number larger than \(n\) exactly when it is detected by an entanglement witness for \(S_n\). The source prints exact Schmidt rank \(n\), while the convex set and proof require Schmidt rank at most \(n\); the defect is recorded in [ con26a ] .
An element \(q\in A\) belongs to \(P(w)\) exactly when it is constant on every value class of \(w\). If \(i\in I\) and a linear functional \(D\colon P(w)\to \mathbb {R}\) satisfies
then \(D=0\).
Let \(T\colon A\to A\) be real linear, and suppose that \(u,v\in A_{++}\) are local minima of \(\lambda _T\). Put \(w=u^{-1}v\) and \(\delta =u^{-1}T(u)\). Then
and \(\lambda _T\) is constant on \(uP(w)\cap A_{++}\). The same conclusion for two local maxima of \(\lambda _T\) is obtained by applying the local-minimum statement to \(-T\).
For a unital Kraus map \(E\), both \(\mathcal{A}_R(E)\) and \(\mathcal{A}_L(E)\) are unital subalgebras of \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\).
For elements \(a,b\) of a unital C\({}^\ast \)-algebra with \(0\le a,b\), an exponent \(p\in [1,2]\), and \(t\in [0,1]\), the map \(a\mapsto a^p\) is convex for the Loewner order on the positive cone:
This is the convex counterpart of the operator concavity of \(x\mapsto x^p\) for exponents \(p\in [0,1]\).
Write \(\rho _{ij}\in M_{d_B}(\mathbb {C})\) for the blocks determined by a basis of the first factor, and define \(\mathcal R_\rho (X)=\sum _{i,j}X_{ij}\rho _{ij}\). Then
Let \(V_A:\mathcal H_A\to \mathcal K_A\) and \(V_B:\mathcal H_B\to \mathcal K_B\) be isometries between finite-dimensional complex spaces. For every operator \(X\) on \(\mathcal H_A\otimes \mathcal H_B\),
This remains valid when one or more of the spaces have dimension zero.
Let \(\rho \geq 0\) be an operator on \(H_A\otimes H_B\). Let \(V_A:\widehat H_A\to H_A\) and \(V_B:\widehat H_B\to H_B\) be isometries whose range projectors are the support projectors \(P_A\) and \(P_B\) of the two marginals. Set \(W=V_A\otimes V_B\) and \(\rho _c=W^\dagger \rho W\). Then
No marginal is required to be faithful, and zero-dimensional coordinate spaces are permitted.
For a complex square matrix, the two descriptions \(P=P^\dagger \), \(P^2=P\) and \(P^*=P\), \(P^2=P\) are equivalent.
Let \(E\) be an irreducible completely positive map on \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), and let \(A, B \ge 0\) be nonzero positive semidefinite matrices with \(\operatorname{tr}(BA) = 0\). Then there exists \(t\) with \(1 \le t \le D - 1\) such that \(\operatorname{tr}(BE^t(A)) {\gt} 0\).
Let \(\sigma \) be positive semidefinite on \(H_L\otimes H_R\), and let \(\rho \) be any matrix on the same space such that \(\ker \sigma \subseteq \ker \rho \). Then
Let \(\rho \) and \(\sigma \) be positive semidefinite matrices on \(H_L\otimes H_R\) such that \(\ker \sigma \subseteq \ker \rho \). Then
Let \(X\) be a matrix on \(H_L\otimes H_R\), let \(w\in H_L\), and let \((e_r)_r\) be the distinguished orthonormal basis of \(H_R\). Then
Let \(\rho \) and \(\sigma \) be positive semidefinite matrices satisfying \(\ker \sigma \subseteq \ker \rho \), and suppose that
Fix a primitive \(d_C\)-th root of unity, put \(U_g=\mathbf1\otimes W_g\), and define the unweighted Weyl family
Then, for every Weyl index \(g\) and every \(t{\gt}0\),
In particular, the zero Weyl index gives the projected resolvent of the original pair \((\rho ,\sigma )\). No ambient resolvent equality is asserted. The support convention is that of Jenčová–Ruskai, arXiv:0903.2895v4, lines 717–720, and their common-resolvent equality argument is at lines 766–793. This is one analytic step toward the recovery implication of Hayden–Jozsa–Petz–Winter, Theorem 3 and equation (8); it is not the direct-sum Markov decomposition invoked in CPSV16, Lemma Lsigma3.
Let \(\rho \) and \(\sigma \) be positive definite and suppose that \(D(\rho \Vert \sigma ) =D(\operatorname{tr}_C\rho \Vert \operatorname{tr}_C\sigma )\). Put
Then
Hence the raw partial-trace Petz map satisfies \(\mathcal R_\sigma (\operatorname{tr}_C\rho )=\rho \). This is the positive-definite case only; no singular-support conclusion is asserted.
In the finite Weyl coordinates \(\mathbb C^{d_S}\otimes \mathbb C^{\mathbb Z/d_C\mathbb Z}\), let \(\rho \) and \(\sigma \) be positive semidefinite matrices satisfying \(\ker \sigma \subseteq \ker \rho \), and suppose that
Put
If \(P_\sigma \) is the orthogonal projection onto \((\ker \sigma )^\perp \), then
Consequently, \(\mathcal R_\sigma (\operatorname{tr}_C\rho )=\rho \) for the raw support Petz map. The projected relative-modular argument follows Jenčová–Ruskai, arXiv:0903.2895v4, lines 766–793, and the recovery formula is [ HJPW04 , Theorem 3, equation (8) ] . This result does not assert the middle-space direct-sum decomposition in [ CPGSV16 , Lemma Lsigma3, lines 1351–1363 ] .
Let \(\rho \) and \(\sigma \) be positive definite, and suppose that \(D(\rho \Vert \sigma )=D(\operatorname{tr}_C\rho \Vert \operatorname{tr}_C\sigma )\). For the uniformly weighted Weyl conjugates \(A_g=d_C^{-2}U_g\rho U_g^\dagger \) and \(B_g=d_C^{-2}U_g\sigma U_g^\dagger \), put \(A=\sum _gA_g\) and \(B=\sum _gB_g\). Then
For matrices \(U,V\) on the first factor and a bipartite matrix \(\rho \), conjugating inside by \(V\) and \(U\), taking the first-factor partial transpose, and conjugating outside by \(U\) and \(V\) produces the original partial transpose conjugated by \(U U^{\mathsf T}\) and \(V^{\mathsf T}V\):
Let \(T:M_{2}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{2}(\mathbb {C})\) be Hermiticity preserving, and let \(T'\) be its Pauli-block diagonal truncation. If \(\widehat T\) is written as in 62, then
Equivalently, entrywise,
If \(T\) is positive, then \(T'\) is positive. If \(T\) is completely positive, then \(T'\) is completely positive. These are precisely the forward implications proved in
[
Wol12
, Proposition 2.10, Section 2.4
]
, following Eq. (2.39); the local proof is at Notes/WolfNoteTexSource/ch02_representations.tex, lines 992–998.
For Pauli directions \(a,k\in \{ x,y,z\} \),
Consequently, the dissipator generated by \(\sigma _a\) is \(\mathcal D_{\sigma _a}(X)=\sigma _aX\sigma _a-X\).
For every \(x\in \mathbb {R}^4\),
Let \(T:M_2(\mathbb {C})\to M_2(\mathbb {C})\) be complex linear and let \(X_1,X_2\in \operatorname{SL}(2,\mathbb {C})\). If \(L_i=L(X_i)\) and \(L_{i,\mathbb {C}}\) denotes its complex scalar extension, then
If \(T\) preserves Hermiticity, then \(\widehat T\) has real entries, and Equation 101 is the real identity
in the exact order of [ Wol12 , Eq. (2.43) ] .
- Wolf.spinorMatrixComplex
- Wolf.pauli_expansion_four
- Wolf.coe_spinorMatrix_apply
- Wolf.sl2Congruence_pauli
- Wolf.pauliTransferEntry_unitaryConj_comp
- Wolf.pauliTransferEntry_comp_unitaryConj
- Wolf.pauliTransferMatrix_unitaryConj_comp
- Wolf.pauliTransferMatrix_comp_unitaryConj
- Wolf.pauliTransferMatrix_two_sided_filtering
- Wolf.coe_pauliTransferMatrixReal_of_preservesHermiticity
- Wolf.pauliTransferMatrixReal_two_sided_filtering
- Wolf.SLFiltering.toSL2
- Wolf.pauliTransferMatrixReal_slFiltering
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be positive and trace-preserving, with \(D{\gt}0\), and let
be the span of its peripheral eigenvectors. Then
\(T_\phi (M_{D}(\mathbb {C}))=\mathcal X_T\),
there are positive semidefinite matrices \(\rho _i\) with \(\mathcal X_T=\operatorname{span}\{ \rho _i\} \),
\(T(\mathcal X_T)=\mathcal X_T\).
This is [ Wol12 , Proposition 6.12 (Asymptotic image) ] .
- Module.End.map_eigenspace_of_ne_zero
- IsPositiveMap.fixedPointsSubmodule_peripheralProjection
- IsPositiveMap.range_peripheralProjection_eq_iSup_eigenspace
- IsPositiveMap.span_stationaryDensity_peripheralProjection_eq_peripheralSubspace
- IsPositiveMap.exists_posSemidef_span_eq_iSup_eigenspace
- IsPositiveMap.map_peripheralSubspace
- IsPositiveMap.asymptotic_image
Let \(K\) be a finite matrix family on \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) with Kraus map \(\mathcal{E}_K\). Assume that \(\mathcal{E}_K\) is irreducible, that \(K\) is unital and trace-preserving, and that the adjoint Kraus map has a positive-definite fixed point. Then there exist \(m\geq 1\) and a primitive \(m\)-th root of unity \(\gamma \) such that \(m\mid D\) and the peripheral eigenvalues of \(\mathcal{E}_K\) are exactly \(\{ 1,\gamma ,\gamma ^2,\ldots ,\gamma ^{m-1}\} \).
Let \(E\) be an irreducible unital Kraus map on \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) with a positive-definite adjoint fixed point (trace-preservation is not required). Then there exist \(m \ge 1\) and a primitive \(m\)-th root of unity \(\gamma \) such that the peripheral eigenvalues of \(E\) are exactly \(\{ 1,\gamma ,\gamma ^2,\ldots ,\gamma ^{m-1}\} \).
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be a positive trace-preserving or unital linear map with \(D{\gt}0\). If \(\lambda \) is an eigenvalue of \(T\) with \(|\lambda |=1\), then \(\ker (T-\lambda )^k=\ker (T-\lambda )\) for all \(k\ge 1\). This is [ Wol12 , Proposition 6.2 ] .
Let \(K\) be a finite unital matrix family whose Kraus map is irreducible, and suppose that the adjoint Kraus map fixes a positive-definite matrix. For every peripheral eigenvalue \(\gamma \) of the transfer map, the \(\gamma \)-eigenspace is one-dimensional.
For every positive time \(t\), a quantum dynamical semigroup irreducible at every positive time has the following property: every peripheral eigenvalue \(\mu \) of \(T_t\) admits a nonzero eigenvector \(V\) and a positive integer \(p\) such that \(T_t(V)=\mu V\) and \(T_{pt}(V)=V\).
If the set of peripheral eigenvalues of a linear endomorphism \(E\) on a finite-dimensional space is closed under powers (\(\mu \in \mathrm{peripheral}(E)\) and \(n\geq 1\) imply \(\mu ^n\in \mathrm{peripheral}(E)\)), then every peripheral eigenvalue is a root of unity.
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be positive and trace-preserving, with \(D{\gt}0\). There is a strictly increasing sequence of positive integers \(n_i\) such that \(T^{n_i}\to T_\phi \) pointwise and in operator norm. This is [ Wol12 , Proposition 6.3(i) ] .
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be positive and trace-preserving, with \(D{\gt}0\), and let \(\lambda _{1},\dots ,\lambda _{m}\) denote the distinct eigenvalues of \(T\) of modulus one. Then
both pointwise and in operator norm. This is [ Wol12 , Equation (6.15) ] .
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be positive and trace-preserving, with \(D{\gt}0\). Then \(X\in T_\phi (M_{D}(\mathbb {C}))\) if and only if, for every \(\varepsilon {\gt}0\), there is a positive integer \(n\) such that \(\lVert T^n(X)-X\rVert \leq \varepsilon \). This is the recurrent-vector characterization following [ Wol12 , Equation (6.15) ] . Here Wolf’s \(\mathbb {N}\) is read as the positive integers; allowing \(n=0\) would make the recurrence condition hold for every \(X\).
Let \(E(X)=\sum _iK_iXK_i^\dagger \) be a Kraus map that is unital, and assume that the adjoint Kraus map \(E^*(X)=\sum _iK_i^\dagger XK_i\) has a positive definite fixed point and that \(E\) is irreducible. Then every peripheral eigenvalue of \(E\) is a root of unity.
The range of \(T_\phi \) is the peripheral subspace, \(T_\phi \) is idempotent, and
On a peripheral \(\mu \)-eigenvector, \(T_\phi \) acts as the identity and \(T_\varphi \) acts as multiplication by \(\mu \). These are [ Wol12 , Equations (6.12) and (6.13) ] .
- Module.End.range_peripheralProjection
- Module.End.isIdempotentElem_peripheralProjection
- Module.End.peripheralProjection_comp
- Module.End.peripheralWeightedProjection_eq_comp
- Module.End.peripheralWeightedProjection_eq_peripheralProjection_comp
- Module.End.peripheralProjection_apply_of_mem_eigenspace
- Module.End.peripheralWeightedProjection_apply_of_mem_eigenspace
For \(t \ge 0\),
where \(\Delta = L' - L\). This is [ Wol12 , Corollary 7.1 ] .
Let \(\rho \) and \(\sigma \) be density operators on the finite-dimensional product \(H_L\otimes H_R\) such that \(\ker \sigma \subseteq \ker \rho \). If
then the completed partial-trace Petz channel associated with \(\sigma \) recovers \(\rho \):
This is the right-partial-trace forward implication of [ HJPW04 , Theorem 3, equation (8) ] . The additional off-support term belongs to the trace-preserving completion and vanishes on \(\operatorname{tr}_R\rho \); it is not part of the formula in the cited equation.
Let \(E:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be a positive linear map with \(D{\gt}0\), and assume that \(E(\sigma )\neq 0\) for every nonzero positive semidefinite matrix \(\sigma \). Then there are a nonzero positive semidefinite matrix \(\rho \) and a real number \(r{\gt}0\) such that \(E(\rho )=r\rho \).
Let \(E:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be a positive linear map with \(D{\gt}0\). Then there are a nonzero positive semidefinite matrix \(\rho \) and a real number \(r\geq 0\) such that
This is the eigenvector-existence part of [ Wol12 , Theorem 6.5 ] . It does not by itself identify \(r\) with the spectral radius.
For any \(A, B, X \in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\),
Each of the four summands on the right is a single-Kraus CP map, so every sesquilinear sandwich decomposes into a signed complex linear combination of CP maps.
Let \(E\colon M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be linear, and let \(\rho \) and \(\sigma \) be positive-definite fixed points of \(E\). Suppose every nonzero positive-semidefinite fixed point of \(E\) is positive definite. Then \(\sigma =c\rho \) for some \(c\in \mathbb {C}\).
Let \(I\) and \(J\) be finite index sets, and let \(X\in \mathbb {C}^{(I\times J)\times (I\times J)}\) be positive definite. If \(I\) is nonempty, then the matrix with entries \((\operatorname{tr}_I X)_{j,j'}=\sum _{i\in I}X_{(i,j),(i,j')}\) is positive definite.
Let \(I\) and \(J\) be finite index sets, and let \(X\in \mathbb {C}^{(I\times J)\times (I\times J)}\) be positive definite. If \(J\) is nonempty, then the matrix with entries \((\operatorname{tr}_J X)_{i,i'}=\sum _{j\in J}X_{(i,j),(i',j)}\) is positive definite.
Let \(E\colon M_D(\mathbb C)\to M_D(\mathbb C)\) be a positive, trace-preserving linear map and \(X=E(X)\) a fixed point. Decompose \(X\) into Hermitian and anti-Hermitian parts and then each into orthogonal positive and negative parts, yielding four positive semidefinite operators \(P_1,\dots ,P_4\). Then \(E(P_j)=P_j\) for \(j=1,\dots ,4\); in other words, every fixed point is a \(\mathbb C\)-linear combination of four positive-semidefinite fixed points. In particular, if \(E\) is a channel and \(H=H^\dagger \) is fixed by \(E\), then there are positive-semidefinite fixed points \(Q_1,Q_2\) such that \(H=Q_1-Q_2\).
This is Wolf Proposition 6.8.
Let \(E\) be a positive trace-preserving linear map and let \(X=E(X)\) be a fixed point. Set \(H_1=X+X^*\) and \(H_2=i(X-X^*)\), and write \(H_j=P_{j,+}-P_{j,-}\) for the canonical positive and negative parts. Then all four positive semidefinite matrices \(P_{j,\pm }\) are fixed by \(E\). This is [ Wol12 , Proposition 6.8 ] .
Let \(f : M_{D}(\mathbb {C}) \to \mathbb {C}\) be a complex-linear functional, where \(D{\gt}0\). If \(f(X) \geq 0\) for every \(X \geq 0\) and \(f(\mathbb {1})=1\), then there is a density matrix \(\rho \in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) such that \(f(X) = \operatorname{tr}(\rho X)\) for every \(X \in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\).
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be a positive complex-linear map. Suppose that
for every Hermitian matrix \(H\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\). Then there is an invertible matrix \(Y\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) such that either
for every \(X\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), or
for every \(X\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\). This is precisely the implication (2) \(\Rightarrow \) (3) of [ Wol12 , Proposition 3.6 ] .
The inverse of a bijective trace-preserving linear map is trace preserving. If \(T\) is positive, then \(T^{-1}\) is positive exactly when \(T\) maps the positive-semidefinite cone onto itself. If both maps are positive and trace preserving, then \(|\det T|=1\).
- ChannelDeterminant.Internal.inverseOfBijective_isTracePreservingMap
- ChannelDeterminant.Internal.mapsPSDConeOnto_of_inverseOfBijective_isPositiveMap
- ChannelDeterminant.Internal.inverseOfBijective_isPositiveMap_of_mapsPSDConeOnto
- ChannelDeterminant.Internal.inverseOfBijective_isPositiveMap_iff_mapsPSDConeOnto
- ChannelDeterminant.Internal.channelDet_norm_eq_one_of_inverseOfBijective_isPositiveMap
For a unitary \(U\), the inverse of \(A\mapsto UAU^\dagger \) is conjugation by \(U^{-1}\). The inverse of \(A\mapsto UA^{\mathsf T}U^\dagger \) is ordinary transposition after conjugation by \(U^{-1}\). Both inverse maps are positive; the reversed composition order in the transpose branch is essential.
- ChannelDeterminant.Internal.inverseOfBijective_unitaryChannel
- ChannelDeterminant.Internal.inverseOfBijective_unitaryChannel_comp_transpose
- ChannelDeterminant.Internal.inverseOfBijective_unitaryChannel_isPositiveMap
- ChannelDeterminant.Internal.inverseOfBijective_unitaryChannel_comp_transpose_isPositiveMap
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be positive with \(T(\mathbb {1})\le \mathbb {1}\). If \(a\le 0\le b\) and \(a\mathbb {1}\le A\le b\mathbb {1}\), then
This is the matrix form of [ Wol12 , Equation (5.21) ] .
Let \(D\geq 1\), and let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be positive. Then, for every \(X\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\),
This is the Russo–Dye estimate invoked in the proof of [ Wol12 , Proposition 6.1 ] , at local source line 84. Here \(\| \cdot \| _\infty \) is the C\(^*\)-operator norm, rather than the Frobenius norm or a row-sum norm.
Let \(D\geq 1\), and let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be positive. Every eigenvalue \(\mu \) of \(T\) satisfies
and consequently
This is [ Wol12 , Proposition 6.1 ] .
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be positive with \(T(\mathbb {1})\le \mathbb {1}\), and let \(A\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be Hermitian. If \(\operatorname{spec}(A)\subseteq [a,b]\) with \(a\le 0\le b\), then
This is [ Wol12 , Equation (5.21) ] .
Let \(S\subseteq M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be a unital \(*\)-subalgebra, and let \(E:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be a positive complex-linear map whose image lies in \(S\) and whose restriction to \(S\) is the identity. There are positive integers \(d_k,m_k\), a unitary \(U\), and density matrices \(\rho _k\in M_{m_k}(\mathbb {C})\) such that
and, for every \(A\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\),
Equivalently, cyclicity of the partial trace permits the factor \(\rho _k\otimes \mathbb {1}_{d_k}\) to be placed on the right of \((U^*AU)_{kk}\). This is [ Wol12 , Proposition 1.5 and Equation (1.40) ] .
Let \(m,d{\gt}0\), and let \(E:M_{md}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{md}(\mathbb {C})\) be a positive complex-linear map. Suppose that the image of \(E\) is contained in \(\mathbb {1}_m\otimes M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\) and that \(E(\mathbb {1}_m\otimes X)=\mathbb {1}_m\otimes X\) for every \(X\in M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\). Then there is a density matrix \(\rho \in M_{m}(\mathbb {C})\) such that, for every \(A\in M_{md}(\mathbb {C})\),
This is the one-factor case of [ Wol12 , Proposition 1.5 and Equation (1.40) ] .
Let \(D{\gt}0\), and let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be positive and trace-preserving. If \(T(X)=\mu X\) for some nonzero \(X\), then \(|\mu |\leq 1\). This is the unit-disk conclusion of [ Wol12 , Proposition 6.1 ] .
Let \(D\geq 1\), and let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be positive and trace-preserving. Then \(1\) is an eigenvalue with a nonzero positive semidefinite eigenvector, every eigenvalue belongs to the closed unit disk, and \(\varrho (T)=1\). No complete-positivity assumption is made.
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be positive and trace nonincreasing. Then the forward orbit \(\{ T^n(X):n\geq 0\} \) is bounded for every \(X\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\). This is the trace-nonincreasing form of [ Wol12 , Proposition 6.3 ] .
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be positive and trace-preserving. Then \(T\) has bounded orbits, its Cesàro averages converge pointwise to the mean-ergodic projection \(P_T\), and \(P_T\) is positive and trace-preserving. Its range is precisely the fixed-point space of \(T\):
If \(T(\mathbb {1})=\mathbb {1}\), then \(P_T(\mathbb {1})=\mathbb {1}\). This is the Cesàro projection \(T_\infty \) of [ Wol12 , Proposition 6.3 and Equation (6.14) ] .
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be positive and trace-preserving. The trace adjoint \(P_T^*\) of its mean-ergodic projection is positive, unital, and idempotent. It is a retraction onto the adjoint fixed-point space:
and \(P_T^*(Y)=Y\) if and only if \(T^*(Y)=Y\). This is the adjoint projection used in the proof of [ Wol12 , Theorem 6.14 ] .
Let \(D\geq 1\), and let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be positive and unital. Then \(1\) is an eigenvalue of \(T\), every eigenvalue belongs to the closed unit disk, and \(\varrho (T)=1\). No complete-positivity assumption is made.
Suppose \(p_j{\gt}0\) and \(L_j\leq R_j\) for every \(j\). If \(\sum _jp_jL_j=\sum _jp_jR_j\), then \(L_j=R_j\) for every \(j\). This is the positivity argument applied to strong subadditivity in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1770–1780 ] .
For a positive unital map \(T\) and positive-definite \(A\), one has \(T(\log A)\le \log (T(A))\). This is the corrected logarithmic specialization associated with [ Wol12 , Corollary 5.2(3) ] . The printed common hypothesis \(T(\mathbb {1})\le \mathbb {1}\) is insufficient: in dimension one, for \(0{\lt}c{\lt}1\), the positive subunital map \(T(x)=cx\) and \(A=1\) would give \(0=T(\log A)\le \log (T(A))=\log c\). The corrected theorem instead assumes \(T(\mathbb {1})=\mathbb {1}\); see [ con26i ] .
Let \(\rho \) be a PPT entangled density operator on \(\mathbb {C}^d\otimes \mathbb {C}^{d'}\). Then there is an indecomposable positive map \(T\colon M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{d'}(\mathbb {C})\). This is the PPT-state-to-map direction of Wolf’s Proposition 3.5 [ Wol12 , Chapter 3, Proposition 3.5 ] .
Let \(d,d'\geq 1\). There exists an indecomposable positive map \(T\colon M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{d'}(\mathbb {C})\) if and only if there exists an entangled density operator \(\rho \) on \(\mathbb {C}^d\otimes \mathbb {C}^{d'}\) with \(\rho ^{T_1}\geq 0\). This is Wolf’s Proposition 3.5 in its rectangular form [ Wol12 , Chapter 3, Proposition 3.5 ] .
Let \(E:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be trace-preserving, and let \(\rho \neq 0\) satisfy \(E(\rho )=\rho \) and \(\operatorname{tr}(\rho )\neq 0\). Let \(P\) be the fixed-point projection associated to \(\rho \), as defined in (15). Assume that:
\(E\) is primitive;
every eigenvalue \(\mu \) of \(E\) satisfies \(|\mu |\le 1\);
whenever \(E(X)=X\) and \(\operatorname{tr}(X)=0\), one has \(X=0\).
Then every eigenvalue \(\nu \) of \(E-P\) satisfies \(|\nu |{\lt}1\).
Let \(E:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be an irreducible primitive channel, and let \(\rho \ne 0\) be a positive semidefinite fixed point. Then \(\operatorname{tr}(\rho )\ne 0\) and, for \(P=P_\rho \), \(\rho _{\operatorname{spec}}(E-P){\lt}1\).
Let \(\rho _{AB}\succeq 0\), with marginals \(\rho _A\) and \(\rho _B\). Then
Equivalently, the support of \(\rho _{AB}\) is contained in \(\operatorname{supp}(\rho _A)\otimes \operatorname{supp}(\rho _B)\). This remains valid when either factor has dimension zero.
Let \(\rho \in M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\) be a density matrix and let \(P_1,\ldots ,P_k\in M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\) be orthogonal projections satisfying \(\sum _{i=1}^k P_i=\mathbb {1}\). Define
Then
This is [ Wol12 , Chapter 8, Eq. (8.56) ] .
The matrix \(P_p\) is an orthogonal projection with trace one, and
The map \(p\mapsto P_p\) is injective. Moreover, a unitary \(U\) and coordinatewise conjugation act by
These are the pure-state matrix identities used in [ Wol12 , Chapter 1, Wigner’s theorem ] .
Let \(f\) be a map on the rays of \(\mathbb {C}^d\) such that
for all rays \(p,q\). Then there is a unitary \(U\) such that either \(f(p)=U\cdot p\) for every \(p\), or \(f(p)=U\cdot \overline p\) for every \(p\).
Let \(P\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be positive semidefinite and let \(Q=\operatorname{supp}(P)\). Then the complex linear span of \(C(P)\) is the full support corner:
Let \(E\) be an irreducible positive map on \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\). If \(\rho \geq 0\), \(\rho \neq 0\), and \(E(\rho )=\lambda \rho \) for some \(\lambda \in \mathbb {C}\), then \(\rho \) is positive definite.
Let \(E\) be an irreducible completely positive map on \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\). Suppose \(\rho \neq 0\) and \(\rho ,\sigma \geq 0\) satisfy \(E(\rho )=r\rho \) and \(E(\sigma )=r\sigma \) for a real number \(r{\gt}0\). Then \(\sigma =c\rho \) for some \(c\in \mathbb {C}\). This is the completely positive specialization of the positive-eigenvector uniqueness in [ Wol12 , Theorem 6.3(2–3) ] .
Two ensembles \(\{ \psi _j\} \) and \(\{ \widetilde\psi _\ell \} \) of not necessarily normalized vectors satisfy
iff there is a unitary \(U\) with \(\psi _j = \sum _\ell U_{j\ell }\widetilde\psi _\ell \), where both families are first padded with zero vectors onto one common index set. No relation between the two cardinalities is assumed. Two paddings are recorded: onto the disjoint union \(\iota _1 \sqcup \iota _2\) of the two index sets, and, for ensembles of \(m\) and \(n\) vectors, onto \(\{ k : k {\lt} \max (m,n)\} \).
Let \(\{ \Psi _k\} _{k \in \iota }\) and \(\{ \Phi _k\} _{k \in \iota }\) be ensembles on one common finite index set whose density operators agree with those of \(\{ \psi _i\} _{i \in \iota _1}\) and \(\{ \phi _j\} _{j \in \iota _2}\) respectively. Then
iff there is a unitary \(U \in \mathbb {C}^{\iota \times \iota }\) with \(\Psi _k = \sum _\ell U_{k\ell }\Phi _\ell \).
If two pure-state ensembles \(\{ \psi _i\} _{i \in \iota _1}\) and \(\{ \phi _j\} _{j \in \iota _2}\) are related by an isometric mixing matrix \(V \in \mathbb {C}^{\iota _1 \times \iota _2}\) with \(V^\dagger V = \mathbb {1}\) and \(\psi _i = \sum _j V_{ij} \phi _j\), then they induce the same pure-ensemble density operator. This is the sufficient direction of the Hughston–Jozsa–Wootters theorem; the converse is Theorem 3.6.7.
For a quantum dynamical semigroup \(T_t=e^{tL}\),
This is [ Wol12 , Proposition 7.5 ] .
Assume \(D \ge 1\). Let \(A\) be an injective MPS tensor with \(\sum _i (A^i)^\dagger A^i = \mathbb {1}\). Then the transfer map \(\mathcal{E}_A\) has a unique positive semidefinite fixed point \(\rho \) up to scaling, and \(\rho \) is positive definite.
Assume \(D\ge 1\). Let \(A\) be an MPS tensor such that its transfer map is irreducible and \(\sum _i (A^i)^\dagger A^i=\mathbb {1}\), so that \(\mathcal{E}_A\) is trace-preserving. Then \(\mathcal{E}_A\) has a unique positive definite fixed point, up to scalar multiple.
Let \(T,T':M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D'}(\mathbb {C})\) be trace-preserving and Hermiticity-preserving linear maps with \(T'(X)=\operatorname{tr}[X]\, Y\) for some fixed \(Y\in M_{D'}(\mathbb {C})\). If \(T-\varepsilon T'\) is positive for some \(\varepsilon \geq 0\), then for all density operators \(\rho _1,\rho _2\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\),
See [ Wol12 , Chapter 8, Theorem 8.17 ] .
Let \(\rho \in M_{d_A}(\mathbb {C})\) be a density operator with purification \(\psi \in \mathbb {C}^{d_A}\otimes \mathbb {C}^{d_B}\). For every convex decomposition \(\rho =\sum _i\lambda _i\rho _i\) there is an instrument \(\{ T_i:M_{d_B}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{d_B}(\mathbb {C})\} \) acting on Bob’s system such that
for every \(i\). This is [ Wol12 , Proposition (Quantum steering) ] .
Assume \(d{\gt}0\) and \(k\le d\). A linear map \(T:M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{d'}(\mathbb {C})\) is \(k\)-positive if and only if, for every Hermitian projection \(P\in M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\) of rank \(k\), \(R_P\tau R_P^\dagger \geq 0\), where \(\tau \) is the Choi matrix of \(T\). This is the rank-\(k\) projection formulation of [ Wol12 , Chapter 3, Proposition 3.1 ] .
Assume \(d{\gt}0\) and \(k\le d\). Let \(T:M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{d'}(\mathbb {C})\) have Choi matrix \(\tau \). Suppose that \(R_P\tau R_P^\dagger \geq 0\) for every Hermitian projection \(P\in M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\) of rank \(k\). Then \(T\) is \(k\)-positive.
Assume \(d{\gt}0\). Let \(T:M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{d'}(\mathbb {C})\) be \(k\)-positive, with Choi matrix \(\tau \). If \(P\in M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\) is Hermitian, satisfies \(P^2=P\), and has rank \(k\), then \(R_P\tau R_P^\dagger \geq 0\). This is the forward rank-\(k\) projection-compression direction of [ Wol12 , Chapter 3, Proposition 3.1 ] .
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be complex-linear. Suppose that for every \(v\in \mathbb {C}^D\) there is a scalar \(c_v\in \mathbb {C}\) such that \(T(|v\rangle \! \langle v|)=c_v|v\rangle \! \langle v|\). Then there is a scalar \(c\in \mathbb {C}\) such that \(T=c\, \operatorname{id}\).
For every complex-linear map \(\mathcal L:M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{e}(\mathbb {C})\),
For every complex-linear map \(\mathcal L:M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{e}(\mathbb {C})\),
If \(\mathcal L:M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{e}(\mathbb {C})\) is a Hilbert–Schmidt contraction, then
Let \(n\ge 1\) and let \(\rho \) be a bipartite matrix, with \(\rho ^{F}\) its image under the factor swap \(\rho ^{F}_{(i_2,i_1),(j_2,j_1)}=\rho _{(i_1,i_2),(j_1,j_2)}\). If \((T_n\otimes \operatorname{id})(\rho )\ge 0\) then \(n\, \mathbb {1}\otimes \rho _2\ge \rho \), and if \((T_n\otimes \operatorname{id})(\rho ^{F})\ge 0\) then \(n\, \rho _1\otimes \mathbb {1}\ge \rho \), where \(\rho _1\) and \(\rho _2\) are the reduced densities of \(\rho \) on the first and second factors. Because the factor swap is a unitary reindexing, \((\operatorname{id}\otimes T_n)(\rho )\ge 0 \iff (T_n\otimes \operatorname{id})(\rho ^{F})\ge 0\), so the second hypothesis is Wolf’s symmetric condition \((\operatorname{id}\otimes T_n)(\rho )\ge 0\) expressed through the swap.
This is the second step of Wolf’s two-step argument for [ Wol12 , Equation (3.18) ] . The source states the inequalities under the premise that \(\rho \) has Schmidt number at most \(n\), and reaches \((T_n\otimes \operatorname{id})(\rho )\ge 0\) from that premise by the \(n\)-positivity of \(T_n\); that first step is taken here as the hypothesis rather than derived. The first step and the composed full criterion with the Schmidt-number premise are Theorem 4.13.8.
On a general bipartite system \(M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\otimes M_{d'}(\mathbb {C})\), a state of Schmidt number at most \(n\) satisfies the reduction criterion
with \(\rho _1\) and \(\rho _2\) the reduced densities on the first and second factors. No relation is imposed between \(d\) and \(d'\); each inequality carries only the \(n\)-positivity threshold of \(T_n\) on its acting factor.
For \(D\ge 1\), the map \(T_1(X)=\operatorname{tr}(X)\mathbb {1}-X\) is completely copositive and hence decomposable. More precisely, the Choi matrix of \(T_1\circ \theta \), where \(\theta \) is transposition, is
with \(F\) the swap operator on \(\mathbb {C}^D\otimes \mathbb {C}^D\).
For positive definite matrices \(\rho ,\sigma \) and a positive definite matrix \(\tau \) of unit trace,
Let \(\rho \) and \(\sigma \) be positive semidefinite matrices such that \(\ker \sigma \subseteq \ker \rho \), and let \(\tau \) be positive semidefinite with \(\operatorname{tr}\tau =1\). Then
For positive definite matrices \(\rho ,\sigma \) on a tensor product of a system factor and an ancilla factor,
where \(\operatorname{tr}_C\) is the partial trace over the ancilla factor. This is the positive-definite base case; the source inequality on the support domain \(\ker \sigma \subseteq \ker \rho \) is Theorem 13.4.35.
For positive semidefinite \(\rho ,\sigma \) on a tensor product of a system factor and an ancilla factor of dimension \(d_C\), with the support condition \(\ker \sigma \subseteq \ker \rho \),
where \(\operatorname{tr}_C\) is the partial trace over the ancilla factor.
Let \(A\) and \(B\) be Hermitian matrices of the same size, with spectral resolutions
Write \(w_{ij}=\langle u_i,v_j\rangle \), and use the total real logarithm: \(\log 0=0\), while \(\log x=\log |x|\) for \(x{\lt}0\). Then
This is an algebraic totalized extension to arbitrary Hermitian matrices of the homogeneous trace-log identity \((\mathrm{J1})\), which Jenčová–Ruskai state for strictly positive matrices in arXiv:0903.2895v4, lines 277–287.
For every positive semidefinite operator \(\omega _{XY}\),
No invertibility assumption is made on either marginal. This is [ HJPW04 , Equation (4) ] .
Let \(\rho ,\omega \in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be positive semidefinite matrices of trace one with \(\ker \omega \subseteq \ker \rho \). Assume that for every dimension and every pair of trace-one matrices \(A\succeq 0\) and \(B\succ 0\),
Then
Thus this theorem reduces the singular-reference case to the faithful comparison. Theorem 13.12.14 supplies the hypothesis in (206).
Let \(\rho ,\omega \in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) satisfy \(\rho \succeq 0\), \(\omega \succ 0\), and \(\operatorname{tr}\rho =1\). Then
No normalization of \(\omega \) is required.
Let \(\rho ,\omega \in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be positive semidefinite matrices of trace one. If \(\ker \omega \subseteq \ker \rho \), then
Let \(A\) and \(B\) be positive definite, with spectral resolutions \(A=\sum _i\alpha _i|u_i\rangle \! \langle u_i|\) and \(B=\sum _j\beta _j|v_j\rangle \! \langle v_j|\). Put \(w_{ij}=\langle u_i,v_j\rangle \). Let \(L_A\) and \(R_B\) denote left and right multiplication, \(L_A(X)=AX\) and \(R_B(X)=XB\). Then, for \(t{\gt}0\),
Both quadratic forms are continuous on \((0,\infty )\). Moreover,
and the integrand in (138) is continuous and integrable on the positive half-line. This is the positive-definite spectral route of Jenčová–Ruskai, arXiv:0903.2895v4, §4.
- Matrix.sourceAResolventQuadratic
- Matrix.sourceBResolventQuadratic
- Matrix.leftRight_mulVec_vec_transpose
- Matrix.sourceA_resolvent_quadratic_spectral
- Matrix.sourceB_resolvent_quadratic_spectral
- Matrix.sourceAResolventQuadratic_continuousOn
- Matrix.sourceBResolventQuadratic_continuousOn
- Matrix.quantumRelativeEntropy_posDef_spectral
- Matrix.relativeEntropyResolventIntegrand
- Matrix.relativeEntropyResolventIntegrand_integrableOn
- Matrix.relativeEntropyResolventIntegrand_continuousOn
- Matrix.quantumRelativeEntropy_resolvent_integral
Let \(\rho ,\omega \in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be positive semidefinite with \(\ker \omega \subseteq \ker \rho \). Let \(V:\mathbb {C}^k\to \mathbb {C}^D\) satisfy
Then
The logarithm is totalized by \(\log 0=0\) on the kernel.
Let \(A\) and \(B\) be positive semidefinite matrices of the same size, let \(P_B\) be the orthogonal projection onto the support of \(B\), and, for \(t{\gt}0\), set
Write \(S_t^+\) for the generalized inverse that vanishes on \(\ker S_t\). Define
With the spectral notation of Theorem 13.6.15,
Consequently,
The function in (126) is continuous on \((0,\infty )\). If \(\ker B\subseteq \ker A\), then \(A P_B=A\), so \(Q_{A P_B}(t)\) equals the quadratic form with source \(\operatorname{vec}(A^{\top })\).
This is the support-projected form of \((\mathrm{intAB})\) in Jenčová–Ruskai, arXiv:0903.2895v4, §2.1, lines 423–427, with the support convention at lines 717–720.
- Matrix.PosSemidef.supportInv
- Matrix.supportLeftRightSuperoperator
- Matrix.supportSourceAQuadratic
- Matrix.rawSupportSourceAQuadratic
- Matrix.supportSourceBQuadratic
- Matrix.supportRelativeEntropyLeftRightIntegrand
- Matrix.supportLeftRight_sourceA_solution
- Matrix.supportSourceAQuadratic_spectral
- Matrix.supportSourceBQuadratic_spectral
- Matrix.supportRelativeEntropyLeftRightIntegrand_eq_spectral
- Matrix.supportSourceAQuadratic_eq_raw_of_kernel_le
- Matrix.rawSupportSourceAQuadratic_sub_trace_add_sourceB_eq_spectral
- Matrix.supportRelativeEntropyLeftRightIntegrand_continuousOn
Let \(A\) and \(B\) be positive semidefinite matrices of the same size and suppose that \(\ker B\subseteq \ker A\). With the spectral notation of Theorem 13.6.14, define, for \(t{\gt}0\),
Thus no ordinary quotient with \(\alpha _i=\beta _j=0\) is used. Define also
The function \(I_{A,B}\) is integrable on \((0,\infty )\), and
The trace-log identity \((\mathrm{J1})\), the scalar normalization \((\mathrm{intspec})\), and its matrix form \((\mathrm{intAB})\) occur in Jenčová–Ruskai, arXiv:0903.2895v4, at lines 277–287, 406–413, and 423–427, respectively. The support-domain extension is given at lines 717–720.
This theorem concerns the spectral expression \(I_{A,B}\). The next theorem identifies it with the coordinate-free left-right quadratic form underlying the finite Weyl formula.
For Hermitian matrices \(\rho ,\sigma \) and a unitary \(U\),
Let \(\rho \) and \(\sigma \) be positive semidefinite matrices on \(\mathcal{H}_S\otimes \mathbb {C}^{d_C}\) such that \(\ker \sigma \subseteq \ker \rho \), and suppose that \(D(\rho \Vert \sigma )=D(\operatorname{tr}_C\rho \Vert \operatorname{tr}_C\sigma )\). For a primitive \(d_C\)-th root of unity, put \(U_{ab}=\mathbb {1}_S\otimes W(a,b)\) and
Then, for every \(a,b\),
This is a scalar equality-propagation prerequisite for [ HJPW04 , Theorem 3 and equation (8) ] ; it neither characterizes equality in joint convexity nor asserts recovery.
Let \(\rho \) and \(\sigma \) be positive semidefinite matrices on \(\mathcal{H}_S\otimes \mathbb {C}^{d_C}\) such that \(\ker \sigma \subseteq \ker \rho \), and suppose that \(D(\rho \Vert \sigma )=D(\operatorname{tr}_C\rho \Vert \operatorname{tr}_C\sigma )\). For a primitive \(d_C\)-th root of unity, put \(U_{ce}=\mathbb {1}_S\otimes W(c,e)\) and
Then
This scalar identity is associated with the finite Jensen step in the Weyl proof of data processing. It is a prerequisite for [ HJPW04 , Theorem 3 and equation (8) ] ; it neither characterizes equality in joint convexity nor asserts recovery.
For \(u\ge 0\) and \(s{\gt}0\), one has \(r_n\in [0,s]\) and \(nu=m_ns+r_n\).
Let \(\mathcal{E}_A(\rho ) = \rho \) and let \(S\) be an invertible matrix with \(SS^\dagger = \rho \). Define the gauged operators \(A'^i = S^{-1}A^iS\). Then \(\sum _i A'^i(A'^i)^\dagger = \mathbb {1}\), i.e. the gauged Kraus map is unital. This is the right-canonical normalization.
Let \(m\geq 1\). The linear map \(E:M_{m}(\mathbb {C})\otimes M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{m}(\mathbb {C})\otimes M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\) defined by
is trace-preserving and completely positive. It is a conditional expectation onto the unital \(*\)-subalgebra \(\mathbb 1_m\otimes M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\): it is unital and idempotent, its range lies in that subalgebra, and it fixes the subalgebra pointwise. This is the one-block trace-preserving choice in the family described by [ Wol12 , Proposition 1.5 and Equation (1.40) ] ; it supplies the corresponding one-block codomain retraction for the extension theorem, not the general finite-dimensional codomain construction.
Let \(\rho _{AB}\succeq 0\) have positive definite marginals \(\rho _A\) and \(\rho _B\). Then
No trace normalization is required.
Let \(\rho _{AB}\succeq 0\) be any finite-dimensional bipartite operator. Then
No trace normalization or positive-dimension hypothesis is required. The statement includes the cases in which either marginal support has dimension zero.
Let \(\rho \) be a square matrix and let \(\omega \succeq 0\) have the same finite index set. Let \(e\) be a bijection onto another finite index set. Then
Let \(\rho ,\omega \in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be positive semidefinite with \(\ker \omega \subseteq \ker \rho \). Let \(V:\mathbb {C}^k\to \mathbb {C}^D\) satisfy (189). Then
If \(\omega \succ 0\), then, for every square matrix \(\rho \) of the same size,
Let \(K\) be a trace-preserving Kraus family, let \(\rho {\gt}0\) satisfy \(T(\rho )=\rho \) for the associated channel \(T(\rho )=\sum _iK_i\rho K_i^\dagger \), and assume every adjoint fixed point of \(T^*\) is a scalar multiple of \(\mathbb {1}\). Then \(E_\rho \) is a conditional expectation onto the adjoint fixed-point \(*\)-subalgebra.
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D'}(\mathbb {C})\) be a positive linear map with \(\operatorname{tr}[T(\rho )] = c\, \operatorname{tr}[\rho ]\) for some nonnegative real \(c\) and all \(\rho \in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\). Then for all Hermitian \(H\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), \(\lVert T(H)\rVert _{\operatorname{tr}}\leq c\cdot \lVert H\rVert _{\operatorname{tr}}\). Generalizes Theorem 13.1.19 from the trace-preserving case \(c=1\).
Let \(d,d'{\gt}0\) and let \(\rho \) be a density operator on \(\mathbb {C}^d\otimes \mathbb {C}^{d'}\). Then \(\rho \) has Schmidt number at most \(n\) if and only if
This is Wolf’s rectangular Proposition 3.4 [ Wol12 , Chapter 3, Proposition 3.4 ] .
The zero vector has Schmidt rank zero, every vector satisfies \(\operatorname{SR}(\psi )\le \min (D,k)\), and every product vector \(u\otimes v\) has Schmidt rank at most one.
Assume \(d{\gt}0\). Let \(T:M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{d'}(\mathbb {C})\). If \(\langle \psi ,\tau _T\psi \rangle \ge 0\) for every \(\psi \in \mathbb {C}^{d'}\otimes \mathbb {C}^d\) with \(\operatorname{SR}(\psi )\le k\), then \(T\) is \(k\)-positive. This includes \(k=0\) and imposes no nonemptiness assumption on the output factor.
Assume \(d{\gt}0\). A map \(T:M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{d'}(\mathbb {C})\) is \(k\)-positive if and only if \(\langle \psi ,\tau _T\psi \rangle \ge 0\) for every \(\psi \in \mathbb {C}^{d'}\otimes \mathbb {C}^d\) with \(\operatorname{SR}(\psi )\le k\).
Assume \(d{\gt}0\). For every \(\psi \in \mathbb {C}^d\otimes \mathbb {C}^k\), there is \(X\in M_{d\times k}(\mathbb {C})\) such that
In particular, if \(\operatorname{SR}(\psi )\le r\), then \(X\) may be chosen with \(\operatorname{rank}X\le r\).
The Schmidt singular values are indexed from zero. The nonzero Schmidt singular values of \(\psi \) are exactly those with index below \(\operatorname{SR}(\psi )\). Equivalently, for zero-based indexing, \(s_k(\psi )=0\) if and only if \(\operatorname{SR}(\psi )\le k\).
Let \(P \in M_{D_1}(\mathbb {C})\) and \(R \in M_{D_2}(\mathbb {C})\) be positive semidefinite, and let \(Q \in M_{D_1,D_2}(\mathbb {C})\). The following are equivalent:
The block matrix \(\begin{pmatrix} P & Q \\ Q^\dagger & R \end{pmatrix}\) is positive semidefinite.
One has \(\ker (R)\subseteq \ker (Q)\) and \(P\geq QR^+Q^\dagger \).
One has \(\ker (R)\subseteq \ker (Q)\), \(\ker (P)\subseteq \ker (Q^\dagger )\), and \(Q=P^{1/2}KR^{1/2}\) for the canonical support contraction \(K\), with \(\lVert K\rVert _\infty \leq 1\).
Here \(R^+\) denotes the pseudoinverse. The second support condition in the third clause is necessary in the singular case and is absent from the printed statement of Wolf’s Theorem 5.2.
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be a positive linear map with \(T(\mathbb {1})\le \mathbb {1}\). If \(A\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) admits a positive semidefinite dominant \(B\ge 0\) with \(A^\dagger A\le B\) and \(B\) commuting with \(A\) (\(BA=AB\)), then
This is [ Wol12 , Theorem 5.6 ] .
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be a positive linear map with \(T(\mathbb {1})\le \mathbb {1}\). If \(A\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) is normal, then \(T(A^\dagger A)-T(A^\dagger )T(A)\ge 0\). This is [ Wol12 , Proposition 5.1 ] .
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be a positive linear map with \(T(\mathbb {1})\le \mathbb {1}\). If \(A\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) is subnormal (i.e. there exists a normal operator on a larger space whose compression to \(\mathbb {C}^D\) is \(A\)), then \(T(A^\dagger A)-T(A^\dagger )T(A)\ge 0\). This is [ Wol12 , Theorem 5.5 ] .
Let \(T:M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\) be completely positive and let \((\sigma _\alpha )\) be a Hilbert–Schmidt orthonormal basis of \(M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\). The following are equivalent.
\(T=T^*\).
\(\widehat T=\widehat T^\dagger \), the transfer matrix being taken in the family \((\sigma _\alpha )\) on both sides.
\(T\) admits a family of Hermitian Kraus operators.
This is [ Wol12 , Proposition 2.6 ] .
Let \(b\in \mathbb {R}^n\) and let \(F_0,F_1,\ldots ,F_n\) be Hermitian matrices. Suppose that \(X^0\geq 0\), \(\operatorname{tr}(F_iX^0)=b_i\) for every \(i\), \(F_0-\sum _i y_i^0F_i\geq 0\), and the two objective values are equal. Then, as in [ Wol12 , Chapter 4, equation (4.4) ] ,
Thus \(X^0\) and \(F_0-\sum _i y_i^0F_i\) have orthogonal supports. Under equality of the conic values and primal attainment, a dual vector \(y^0\) is optimal if and only if there is a primal-feasible \(X^0\geq 0\) satisfying this equation and the dual slack is positive semidefinite, as stated at lines 113–116.
- Matrix.PosSemidef.mul_eq_zero_of_trace_mul_eq_zero
- Matrix.PosSemidef.supportProj_mul_supportProj_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero
- SemidefiniteProgram.re_trace_slack_mul_eq_objective_sub
- SemidefiniteProgram.complementary_slackness
- SemidefiniteProgram.complementary_slackness_supports
- SemidefiniteProgram.isDualOptimizer_iff_exists_complementary
For every feasible \(X\) and \(y\),
Taking the supremum and infimum gives Wolf’s semidefinite weak-duality inequality, equation (4.3), with the extended-real conventions of Definition 5.1. If there is a strictly feasible \(X{\gt}0\) and the primal value is finite, equality holds and the dual optimum is attained. Dually, a strictly positive slack and a finite dual value give equality and primal attainment. These finiteness hypotheses are the correction required for the unqualified printed claim at lines 100–105.
- SemidefiniteProgram.weak_duality_pointwise
- SemidefiniteProgram.weak_duality
- SemidefiniteProgram.exists_dualOptimizer_of_primalStrict_of_primalValue_eq_coe
- SemidefiniteProgram.values_eq_of_primalStrict_of_primalValue_eq_coe
- SemidefiniteProgram.exists_primalOptimizer_of_dualStrict_of_dualValue_eq_coe
- SemidefiniteProgram.values_eq_of_dualStrict_of_dualValue_eq_coe
Let \(\{ |\psi _i\rangle \! \langle \psi _i|\} _{i=0}^{n-1}\) be a rank-one POVM on \(\mathbb {C}^d\) with \(n\) outcomes, i.e. \(\sum _i|\psi _i\rangle \! \langle \psi _i|=\mathbb {1}_d\). Then necessarily \(d\le n\), and there exists an orthonormal basis \(\{ \phi _i\} _{i=0}^{n-1}\) of \(\mathbb {C}^n\) such that each \(\psi _i\) is the restriction of \(\phi _i\) to the first \(d\) coordinates. Concretely, the rows of a unitary \(U\in U(n)\) give the \(\phi _i\), and \(\psi _i\) is recovered as \(\psi _i(j)=U_{i,\, j}\) for \(j=0,\dots ,d-1\).
Unlike 3.12.12, whose ambient Hilbert space is \(\mathbb {C}^D\otimes \mathbb {C}^n\) of dimension \(D\cdot n\), this theorem yields the sharp \(n\)-dimensional ambient space asserted by [ Wol12 , Theorem “Neumark’s theorem” ] .
The corresponding corollary starts from a positive operator-valued measure with an explicit rank-one decomposition.
Let \((P_i)_i\) be a symmetric informationally complete family. Every \(\rho \in M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\) satisfies
Suppose, in addition, that \(d\ge 2\). Any family attaining equality in (153) is linearly independent.
Local fix (one-dimensional equality families): The corresponding assertion printed in [ Wol12 , Chapter 2, Proposition “SIC POVMs”, lines 816–823 ] is false when \(d=1{\lt}n\): every \(P_i\) then equals \([1]\). This deviation is recorded in the QICLean paper-gap note [ con26g ] .
For every \(\rho \in M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\),
Equivalently, the left-hand side is the quantum channel with Kraus operators \(K_i=P_i/\sqrt d\).
For a symmetric informationally complete family \((P_i)_i\), the operators
are, respectively, the effects of a POVM and a trace-preserving Kraus family.
The \(d^2\) projectors in a symmetric informationally complete family form a basis of \(M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\).
Suppose that \(2\le n\), \(1\le d\le n\), and that \(P_1,\ldots ,P_n\in M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\) are positive semidefinite matrices satisfying \(\operatorname{tr}(P_i^2)=1\). Then
Under the hypotheses of Theorem 3.22.1, equality holds in (153) if and only if
This is the Kronecker identity used in the specialization of [ Wol12 , Chapter 8, Proposition “Jordan condition number and detailed balance” ] . If \(\sigma {\gt}0\) and \(\Sigma (X)=\sqrt\sigma \, X\sqrt\sigma \), then
At the top index \(n=D'\), the Schmidt-rank constraint is vacuous and each Ky-Fan \(D'\)-norm reduces to \(\| \rho _i\| _{(D')}=\operatorname{tr}\rho _i=1\). The Rayleigh characterization of the least eigenvalue then applies: every normalized \(\psi \) satisfies \(\nu _{\min }\le \langle \psi |\tau |\psi \rangle \), and a least-eigenvalue eigenvector attains \(\langle \psi |\tau |\psi \rangle =\nu _{\min }\). Together they give
There is no Schmidt-rank restriction. At \(n=D'\) the right-hand side of the upper bound of [ Wol12 , Chapter 3, Proposition 3.2 ] reads \(\nu +(\nu _--\nu )\| \rho _-\| _{(D')}=\nu _-=\nu _{\min }\), so the display is that bound at that index. The positivity index of [ Wol12 , Chapter 3, Proposition 3.1 ] runs over \(1\le n\le D\) with \(D\) the dimension of the second factor, so \(n=D'\) is an index the source speaks about when \(D'\le D\), and lies beyond its range when \(D'{\gt}D\). The lower bound of the same proposition reads, at that index, \(\nu _0+\sum _{i:\nu _i\le 0}(\nu _i-\nu _0)\), an inequality no stronger than (14), and Theorem 4.3.1.6 establishes it. With Theorems 4.2.2.6 and 4.2.2.7, both bounds then hold at every \(n\ge 1\).
Let \(\tau \) be a Hermitian operator on \(\mathbb {C}^{D'}\otimes \mathbb {C}^{D}\) with eigenvalues \(\nu _i\), normalized eigenvectors \(\phi _i\) and reduced densities \(\rho _i=\operatorname{tr}_2|\phi _i\rangle \! \langle \phi _i|\). Assume \(D',D\ge 1\), let \(1\le n{\lt}D'\) and let \(\nu _0\ge 0\) be a lower bound for the positive eigenvalues, the smallest positive eigenvalue in [ Wol12 , Chapter 3 ] . Then
This is [ Wol12 , Chapter 3, equation (3.7) ] for \(n{\lt}D'\). The indices \(n\ge D'\) are Theorem 4.3.1.6, and the two together give the equation at every \(n\ge 1\).
Assume \(D',D\ge 1\). Once the Schmidt-rank bound reaches the dimension \(D'\) of the first tensor factor the constraint is vacuous, and each Ky-Fan norm collapses to \(\| \rho _i\| _{(n)}=\operatorname{tr}\rho _i=1\). For \(n\ge D'\),
which is the right-hand side of (3.8) there, since \(\nu +(\nu _--\nu )\| \rho _-\| _{(n)}=\nu _-=\nu _{\min }\) when \(\nu _-\) is the only non-positive eigenvalue. The right-hand side of (3.7) reads \(\nu _0+\sum _{i:\nu _i\le 0}(\nu _i-\nu _0)\), which can be strictly weaker once \(\tau \) has two non-positive eigenvalues: for the spectrum \((-2,-1,3)\) with \(\nu _0=3\) it is \(-6\) while \(\nu _{\min }=-2\). It coincides with \(\nu _{\min }\) when \(\nu _0=0\) and only one eigenvalue is strictly negative. It is still a lower bound: for those same \(n\), and for \(\nu _0\ge 0\) a lower bound for the positive eigenvalues as in Theorem 4.3.1.3,
and (3.7) holds at those indices as well. With Theorems 4.3.1.3 and 4.3.1.4 this covers every \(n\ge 1\), hence the range \(1\le n\le D\) of [ Wol12 , Chapter 3, Proposition 3.1 ] , where \(D\) is the dimension of the second tensor factor.
With \(\tau \), \(\phi _i\) and \(\rho _i\) as above and \(D',D\ge 1\), let \(1\le n{\lt}D'\) and suppose every eigenvalue of \(\tau \) is at most \(\nu \). Then, for every eigenvector index \(j\),
Taking \(\nu \) to be the largest positive eigenvalue and \(j\) the index of the unique non-positive eigenvalue \(\nu _-\), which is the situation in which all other eigenvalues are strictly positive, gives \(\inf E_n(\tau )\le \nu +(\nu _--\nu )\| \rho _-\| _{(n)}\), that is, [ Wol12 , Chapter 3, equation (3.8) ] for \(n{\lt}D'\). The indices \(n\ge D'\) are Theorem 4.3.1.6, and the two together give the equation at every \(n\ge 1\).
Let \(\tau \) be a Hermitian operator on \(\mathbb {C}^{D'}\otimes \mathbb {C}^{D}\) with eigenvalues \(\nu _i\) and normalized eigenvectors \(\phi _i\), and write \(\rho _i=\operatorname{tr}_2|\phi _i\rangle \! \langle \phi _i|\) for the reduced density operator of \(\phi _i\) on the first factor. Let \(1\le n{\lt}D'\) and let \(\nu _0\ge 0\) be a lower bound for the positive eigenvalues (the smallest positive eigenvalue). Then every normalized vector \(\psi \) of Schmidt rank at most \(n\) satisfies
Hence the same bound holds for the infimum over such vectors. This is the lower bound of [ Wol12 , Chapter 3, Proposition 3.2 ] for \(n{\lt}D'\); the top index \(n=D'\) is Theorem 4.2.2.8.
Let \(D\geq 1\), let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be positive, and suppose \(X{\gt}0\) and \(T(X)=rX\) with \(r{\gt}0\). Then \(\varrho (T)=r\). Irreducibility and complete positivity are not needed once this Perron pair is supplied. This is the final similarity argument in [ Wol12 , Theorem 6.3(4) ] .
With \(\tau \), \(\phi _i\), and \(\rho _i\) as above, let \(1\le n{\lt}D'\) and suppose every eigenvalue of \(\tau \) is at most \(\nu \). For any eigenvector index \(j\), there is a normalized vector \(\psi \) of Schmidt rank at most \(n\) with
Hence the infimum over such vectors lies below that value. Taking \(\nu \) to be the largest positive eigenvalue and \(j\) the index of the unique non-positive eigenvalue \(\nu _-\) recovers the upper bound \(\nu +(\nu _--\nu )\| \rho _-\| _{(n)}\) of [ Wol12 , Chapter 3, Proposition 3.2 ] . The statement is for \(n{\lt}D'\); the top index \(n=D'\) is Theorem 4.2.2.8.
Let \(n\in \mathbb {R}^3\) be a unit vector. Write \(n\cdot \sigma \) for its Pauli contraction, \(n\cdot B\) for the boost generator with time–space blocks \(n\) and \(n^{\mathsf T}\), and \(n\cdot R\) for Wolf’s rotation generator \(R_i=\sum _{j,k}\varepsilon _{ijk}\lvert k\rangle \langle j\rvert \). For every \(t\in \mathbb {R}\),
If \(u(n,t)=(\cosh (t),\sinh (t)n)\), then \(B_{u(n,t)}=\exp (t\, n\cdot B)\), and the spinor map satisfies
The positive sign in the second Lorentz exponential is the correction to the sign printed in [ Wol12 , Eq. (2.44) ] ; with the displayed Pauli matrices and column-vector convention, the printed negative sign rotates in the opposite direction.
- Wolf.pauliVector
- Wolf.boostGenerator
- Wolf.rotationGenerator
- Wolf.exp_smul_pauliVector
- Wolf.exp_smul_boostGenerator
- Wolf.exp_neg_I_smul_pauliVector
- Wolf.exp_smul_rotationGenerator
- Wolf.rapidityMinkowski
- Wolf.lorentzBoost_rapidityMinkowski_eq_exp
- Wolf.boostExpSL2
- Wolf.rotationExpSL2
- Wolf.boostExpSL2_coe_eq_exp
- Wolf.rotationExpSL2_coe_eq_exp
- Wolf.spinorMatrix_boostExpSL2
- Wolf.spinorMatrix_rotationExpSL2
The homomorphism \(\Lambda \) in (97) is surjective. Its fibres contain exactly two points: for all \(X,Y\in \operatorname{SL}(2,\mathbb {C})\),
Thus \(\operatorname{SL}(2,\mathbb {C})\) is a double cover of \(\mathrm{SO}^+(1,3)\), as stated after [ Wol12 , Eq. (2.42) ] .
- Wolf.IsSpecialOrthochronousLorentz.inv
- Wolf.IsSpecialOrthochronousLorentz.mul
- Wolf.row_norm_of_lorentz
- Wolf.col_norm_of_lorentz
- Wolf.lorentzRotationBlock_one
- Wolf.exists_so3_block_of_fixes_time
- Wolf.boostSpinor_isHermitian
- Wolf.boostSpinor_posDef
- Wolf.exists_sl2_spinorMatrix_eq
- Wolf.spinorCoverHom_surjective
- Wolf.spinorMatrix_eq_one_iff
- Wolf.spinorCoverHom_eq_iff_eq_or_eq_neg
- Wolf.spinorCoverHom_eq_one_iff
The assignment \(X\mapsto L(X)\) is multiplicative, and for every \(X\in \operatorname{SL}(2,\mathbb {C})\),
Hence \(L(X)\in \mathrm{SO}^+(1,3)\). It preserves both the Minkowski form and the closed future cone, and \(L(-X)=L(X)\).
- Wolf.spinorMatrix_zero_zero
- Wolf.spinorMatrix_zero_zero_pos
- Wolf.spinorMatrix_preserves_minkowskiQuadratic
- Wolf.spinorMatrix_preserves_minkowskiBilinear
- Wolf.spinorMatrix_transpose_mul_metric_mul
- Wolf.spinorMatrix_mem_futureCone_iff
- Wolf.spinorLinearEquiv_mul_apply
- Wolf.spinorMatrix_mul
- Wolf.spinorMatrix_one
- Wolf.spinorLinearEquivMap
- Wolf.spinorMatrix_det
- Wolf.spinorMatrix_neg
- Wolf.spinorMatrix_mul_metric_mul_transpose
- Wolf.spinorMatrix_isSpecialOrthochronousLorentz
- Wolf.spinorMap
Let \(\rho _{ABC}\) be a tripartite density matrix and set \(\sigma _{ABC}=(\mathbf1_A/d_A)\otimes \rho _{BC}\). Then equality holds in strong subadditivity if and only if relative-entropy data processing under the partial trace over \(C\) is saturated for this pair:
By Lemma 13.6.3, the reference on the right is \((\mathbf1_A/d_A)\otimes \rho _B\).
This is an equivalent hypothesis-free criterion with a different reference state. The exact product-marginal formulation is Theorem 13.6.48.
Let \(\rho _{ABC}\) be a tripartite density matrix. Then equality holds in strong subadditivity if and only if relative-entropy data processing under the partial trace over \(C\) is saturated for the pair \(\rho _{ABC}\) and \(\rho _A\otimes \rho _{BC}\):
Moreover, \(\operatorname{tr}_C(\rho _A\otimes \rho _{BC})=\rho _A\otimes \rho _B\). This is the product-marginal formulation in [ HJPW04 , Equations (5)–(7) ] .
Let \(\rho _{ABC}\) be a tripartite density matrix attaining equality in strong subadditivity. The raw Petz support map for the reference \(\rho _A\otimes \rho _{BC}\) recovers \(\rho _{ABC}\) from \(\rho _{AB}\). Moreover,
where \(\widehat{\mathcal R}_{\rho _{BC}}\) is a trace-preserving completely positive extension of the support formula. This is equation (11) of [ HJPW04 ] , obtained from Theorem 3 and equation (8) together with the supported form of equation (10).
No marginal is required to be invertible. If \(\rho _A\) is singular, the displayed factorization is asserted on the supported input \(\rho _{AB}\) only; it is not a global factorization of an ambient product-reference completion.
Let \(\rho \) be a Hermitian operator on \(A\otimes B\otimes C\), and let \(e_A:A'\to A\), \(e_B:B'\to B\), and \(e_C:C'\to C\) be bijections. Define \(\rho '\) by
If \(\rho \) satisfies equality in strong subadditivity, then so does \(\rho '\).
Let \(S\) be a \(*\)-subalgebra of \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) and let \(\mathcal{D}\) be a finite, nonempty family of pairwise orthogonal subspaces of \(\mathbb {C}^D\), irreducible under \(S\) and pairwise of the same type. Write \(m\) for the number of pieces in \(\mathcal{D}\); all pieces share one dimension \(d\). Then the component \(C=\bigvee _{W\in \mathcal{D}}W\) has an orthonormal basis \((f_{i,j})_{0\leq i{\lt}m,\, 0\leq j{\lt}d}\) such that for every \(A\in S\) there is a matrix \(B\in M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\) satisfying
for all \(i{\lt}m\) and \(j{\lt}d\). In the adapted basis, \(A\) acts on \(C\) by the matrix \(B\) on the irreducible index, identically across the multiplicity index; after reordering the indices this is the block \(M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\otimes \mathbb {1}_m\) of [ Wol12 , Theorem 6.14 ] . The vectors \((f_{i,j})_{0\leq j{\lt}d}\) of the \(i\)-th copy span one of the pieces of \(\mathcal{D}\).
Let \(S\) be a \(*\)-subalgebra of \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\). There are positive integers \(d_k,m_k\) and an orthonormal basis \((f_{k,i,j})_{k{\lt}K,\, i{\lt}m_k,\, j{\lt}d_k}\) of \(\mathbb {C}^D\) such that every \(A\in S\) acts by
while every \(T\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) commuting with all members of \(S\) acts by
Thus the same orthonormal identification realizes \(S\) on the second tensor factor and its commutant on the complementary first tensor factor. This is the finite-dimensional \(C^*\)-algebra step used in the proof of [ Bei12 , Lemma 2.1 ] .
Let \(S\) be a \(*\)-subalgebra of \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\). There are \(K\in \mathbb {N}\), positive dimensions \(d_0,\ldots ,d_{K-1}\) and multiplicities \(m_0,\ldots ,m_{K-1}\), and an orthonormal basis \((f_{k,i,j})_{k{\lt}K,\, i{\lt}m_k,\, j{\lt}d_k}\) of \(\mathbb {C}^D\) such that for every \(A\in S\) there are matrices \(B_k\in M_{d_k}(\mathbb {C})\) satisfying
for all \(k{\lt}K\), \(i{\lt}m_k\), and \(j{\lt}d_k\). In this basis, \(A\) acts on the \(k\)-th component as \(\mathbb {1}_{m_k}\otimes B_k\). Each row \((f_{k,i,j})_{0\leq j{\lt}d_k}\) spans a subspace irreducible under \(S\), and rows drawn from distinct components span subspaces that are never of the same type. Only the containment direction is asserted: every member of \(S\) takes this form. Equality with the block algebra, including the reverse inclusion, is Theorem 10.6.9.
Let \(S\) be a \(*\)-subalgebra of \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\). Then \(\mathbb {C}^D\) is the supremum of a finite family of pairwise orthogonal isotypic components, and each component carries an orthonormal basis \((f_{i,j})\), indexed by a multiplicity index \(i{\lt}m\) and an irreducible index \(j{\lt}d\), such that every \(A\in S\) acts by
for a matrix \(B\in M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\) depending only on \(A\) and the component. In the adapted bases, the action of \(S\) on each component is by matrix-times-identity blocks, the form \(M_{d_k}(\mathbb {C})\otimes \mathbb {1}_{m_k}\) of [ Wol12 , Theorem 6.14 ] .
Let \(S\) be a \(*\)-subalgebra of \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\). Then \(\mathbb {C}^D\) is the sum of a finite family of pairwise orthogonal subspaces, each irreducible under \(S\); that is, \(\mathbb {C}^D\) is an orthogonal direct sum of irreducible invariant subspaces.
Let \(S\) be a \(*\)-subalgebra of \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\). Then \(\mathbb {C}^D\) is the supremum of a finite family \(\mathcal{C}\) of pairwise orthogonal subspaces, the isotypic components, and each component \(C\in \mathcal{C}\) is the supremum \(C=\bigvee _{W\in \mathcal{D}_C}W\) of a finite, nonempty class \(\mathcal{D}_C\) of pairwise orthogonal subspaces irreducible under \(S\) that are pairwise of the same type. Moreover, for distinct components \(C\neq C'\), no subspace irreducible under \(S\) contained in \(C\) is of the same type as any subspace irreducible under \(S\) contained in \(C'\).
Let \(S\) be a \(*\)-subalgebra of \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\). There are \(K\in \mathbb {N}\), positive dimensions \(d_0,\ldots ,d_{K-1}\) and multiplicities \(m_0,\ldots ,m_{K-1}\) with \(\sum _kd_km_k=D\), realized by an explicit identification of the index sets, and a unitary \(U\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) such that every \(A\in S\) satisfies
for matrices \(B_k\in M_{d_k}(\mathbb {C})\) depending on \(A\). Up to reordering the two tensor factors of each block, this is the containment direction of the unital case of the block representation of [ Wol12 , Theorem 6.14 ] : \(S\) is carried by \(U\) into the block algebra \(\bigoplus _k\mathbb {1}_{m_k}\otimes M_{d_k}(\mathbb {C})\). Equality, including the reverse inclusion, is Theorem 10.6.9.
Let \(S\) be a \(*\)-subalgebra of \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\). There are \(K\in \mathbb {N}\), positive dimensions \(d_0,\ldots ,d_{K-1}\) and multiplicities \(m_0,\ldots ,m_{K-1}\) with \(\sum _kd_km_k=D\), realized by an explicit identification of the index sets, and a unitary \(U\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) such that a matrix \(A\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) belongs to \(S\) exactly when
for some matrices \(B_k\in M_{d_k}(\mathbb {C})\); that is, up to reordering the two tensor factors of each block,
This is the block representation of a finite-dimensional \(*\)-algebra in Equation (1.39) of [ Wol12 ] , invoked by [ Wol12 , Theorem 6.14 ] , in the unital case: a \(*\)-subalgebra contains the identity matrix, so there is no zero block.
There exist \(n\in \mathbb {N}\) and dimensions \(d_1,\ldots ,d_n\geq 1\) such that every \(*\)-subalgebra of \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) is \(\mathbb {C}\)-algebra isomorphic to \(\prod _{k=1}^nM_{d_k}(\mathbb {C})\).
Let \(D\ge 1\) and let \(T\colon M_D(\mathbb C)\to M_D(\mathbb C)\) be a continuous, trace-preserving, positive (not necessarily linear) map. Then \(T\) has at least one stationary state: a density matrix \(\rho \) such that \(T(\rho )=\rho \).
This matches Wolf Theorem 6.11 exactly: the hypotheses are continuity, positivity (\(X\geq 0\Rightarrow T(X)\geq 0\)), and trace preservation (\(\operatorname{tr}(T(X))=\operatorname{tr}(X)\)). Linearity is not assumed.
The proof is Wolf’s argument: positivity and trace preservation imply that \(T\) restricts to a continuous self-map of the compact convex set of density matrices; the density-matrix version of Brouwer (Theorem 8.17.6) then yields a fixed point.
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be positive and trace preserving, set \(\rho _0=T_\infty (\mathbb {1})\), and let \(Q_0\) be the support projection of \(\rho _0\). There are a finite-dimensional Hilbert space \(\mathcal H\) and an isometry \(V:\mathcal H\to \mathbb {C}^D\) with \(V^*V=\mathbb {1}_{\mathcal H}\) and \(VV^*=Q_0\) such that
is positive and trace preserving and has a positive definite fixed point. Moreover,
These are Equations (6.52) and (6.51), respectively, of [ Wol12 ] . Thus the complementary fixed-point summand vanishes.
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be positive, and let \(\rho \succeq 0\) satisfy \(T(\rho )=\rho \). If \(Q\) is the support projection of \(\rho \), then, for every \(X\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\),
Let \(K_j:\mathbb {C}^{d}\to \mathbb {C}^{d'}\), \(j=0,\dots ,r-1\), be an arbitrary family of matrices and let \(V=\sum _j K_j\otimes |j\rangle \). Then, for every observable \(A\in M_{d'}(\mathbb {C})\) on the output space,
an identity in \(M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\) on the input space, valid for arbitrary \(K\) independently of any channel. When the \(K_j\) are Kraus operators of a map \(T:M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{d'}(\mathbb {C})\), the right-hand side is the dual (Heisenberg-picture) map \(T^*(A)\) of 2.5.1; the square case is \(d=d'\).
Let \(T:M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{d'}(\mathbb {C})\) be completely positive with Choi matrix \(\tau \) and dual \(T^*\). Then for every \(r\geq \operatorname{rank}(\tau )\) there is a \(V:\mathbb {C}^{d}\to \mathbb {C}^{d'}\otimes \mathbb {C}^{r}\) such that, for all \(A\in M_{d'}(\mathbb {C})\),
and \(V\) is an isometry, \(V^\dagger V=\mathbb {1}_d\), if and only if \(T\) is trace preserving. In the Schrödinger picture one may choose the same type of dilation so that
for every \(\rho \in M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\). In particular \(r=\operatorname{rank}(\tau )\) is an admissible ancilla dimension; by Lemma 3.10.14 no smaller ancilla dimension is admissible, and a dilation with \(r=\operatorname{rank}(\tau )\) is called minimal. This is [ Wol12 , Theorem 2.2 ] .
- ChoiRectangular.exists_stinespringV_of_isKrausCP
- ChoiRectangular.exists_stinespringV_schrodinger_of_isKrausCP
- ChoiRectangular.exists_stinespringV_schrodinger_of_isKrausCPTP
- ChoiRectangular.exists_stinespringV_choiRank_of_isKrausCP
- ChoiRectangular.exists_stinespringV_pairing_of_isKrausCP
- ChoiRectangular.exists_stinespringV_pairing_choiRank_of_isKrausCP
The Kraus map \(T(\rho )=\sum _jK_j\rho K_j^\dagger \) equals the partial trace over the dilation space:
This is the Schrödinger-picture Stinespring representation.
In the square specialization \(d_{\mathrm{in}}=d_{\mathrm{out}}=D\), one has \(V^\dagger V=\mathbb {1}_D\) if and only if \(\sum _j K_j^\dagger K_j=\mathbb {1}_D\). In particular, \(V\) is an isometry precisely when the Kraus map is trace-preserving.
Let \(\rho ,\omega \in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be positive semidefinite and suppose that \(\ker \omega \subseteq \ker \rho \). If \(V:\mathbb {C}^k\to \mathbb {C}^D\) satisfies \(VV^\dagger =P_{\operatorname{supp}(\omega )}\), then
No condition on \(V^\dagger V\) is needed for this identity.
Let \(A\) and \(B\) be positive semidefinite. Their positive square roots, support inverse square roots, and support projections satisfy
Moreover,
The same support projection absorbs the square root:
If \(A\) is positive definite, then \(P_A=\mathbf1\).
- Matrix.PosSemidef.sqrt_kronecker
- Matrix.PosSemidef.supportInvSqrt_kronecker
- Matrix.PosSemidef.cfc_sqrt_mul_supportInvSqrt
- Matrix.PosSemidef.supportInvSqrt_mul_cfc_sqrt
- Matrix.PosSemidef.cfc_sqrt_mul_supportProj
- Matrix.PosSemidef.supportProj_mul_cfc_sqrt
- Matrix.PosSemidef.supportProj_kronecker
- Matrix.PosDef.supportProj_eq_one
Let \(A,B\) be positive semidefinite, let \(t{\gt}0\), set
and let \(P_B\) be the support projection of \(B\). Then
Consequently,
This is the one-pair algebraic identification used in the singular equality argument of Jenčová–Ruskai, arXiv:0903.2895v4, lines 783–790. It does not assert that equality of relative entropies gives a common resolvent for a finite family.
Let \(A\in M_{n}(\mathbb {C})\) be positive semidefinite and let \(v\in \mathbb {C}^n\) satisfy \(\langle v,v\rangle =1\) and \(P_{\operatorname{supp}(A)}v=v\). Then
Here \(\log A\) is defined by the continuous functional calculus with \(\log 0=0\). Compare the finite-dimensional vector-state Jensen argument in [ Bha97 , Chapter V ] .
Let \(I\) be a finite nonempty set. For each \(i\in I\), let \(A_i\) and \(B_i\) be positive-semidefinite matrices satisfying \(\ker B_i\subseteq \ker A_i\). Put
and suppose that
Then, for every \(i\in I\) and \(t{\gt}0\),
Thus the shifted relative-modular resolvents agree on \((\ker B_i)^\perp \). The local support projection is essential; no ambient equality is asserted. This is the support-restricted conclusion of Jenčová–Ruskai, arXiv:0903.2895v4, lines 766–793.
Let \(I\) be a finite nonempty set. For each \(i\in I\), let \(A_i\) and \(B_i\) be positive-semidefinite matrices of the same size satisfying \(\ker B_i\subseteq \ker A_i\). Put
Then the function
is continuous on \((0,\infty )\) and integrable there, and
This is the finite-family support-domain form of \((\mathrm{intspec})\) and \((\mathrm{intAB})\) in Jenčová–Ruskai, arXiv:0903.2895v4, lines 406–431, with the positive-semidefinite convention and kernel hypotheses at lines 717–720 and 766–785.
Under the hypotheses and notation of Theorem 13.6.20, for every \(t{\gt}0\) one has
This is the coefficient-correct combination of the two source defects in \((\mathrm{intAB})\) of Jenčová–Ruskai, arXiv:0903.2895v4, lines 423–435.
Under the hypotheses and notation of Lemma 13.6.24, suppose that
Then, for every \(i\in I\),
This is the support-domain form of the common-resolvent equation \((\mathrm{basiceq})\) in Section 3.1 of Jenčová–Ruskai, arXiv:0903.2895v4. Its residual calculation is the one in the Appendix, equations \((\mathrm{Mj})\) and \((\mathrm{eq:Schz1})\).
Under the hypotheses of Theorem 13.6.20, suppose
Then, for every \(t{\gt}0\),
This is the source-\(B\) pointwise-vanishing passage in Jenčová–Ruskai, arXiv:0903.2895v4, lines 433–435, 652–674, and 788–790. The common projected resolvent conclusion is stated downstream in Theorem 13.6.35.
Under the hypotheses and notation of Lemma 13.6.17, suppose that the source-\(B\) defect vanishes:
Put
and let \(P_{S_i}\) be the support projection of \(S_i\). Then
This is the fixed-parameter support-domain residual step behind \((\mathrm{basiceq})\) in Jenčová–Ruskai, arXiv:0903.2895v4, lines 652–660 and 788–790. No kernel inclusion is needed for this algebraic implication.
Let \(P\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be an orthogonal projection and let \(A_1,\ldots ,A_d\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) satisfy
Then there are \(n=\operatorname{tr}P\), matrices \(C_i\in M_{n}(\mathbb {C})\), an isometry \(V:\mathbb {C}^n\to \mathbb {C}^D\), and a linear isomorphism \(\varphi :M_{n}(\mathbb {C})\xrightarrow {\sim }PM_{D}(\mathbb {C})P\) such that
If \(T_A^*(X)=\sum _iA_i^\dagger XA_i\) and \(T_C^*(X)=\sum _iC_i^\dagger XC_i\), then
Let \(\rho \geq 0\) be a bipartite complex matrix whose first marginal is faithful. Choose an eigenbasis in which \(\operatorname{tr}_B\rho =\operatorname{diag}(p_1,\ldots ,p_{d_A})\) with every \(p_i{\gt}0\), and define the linear map \(\Phi _\rho \) on matrix units by
Write \(\sigma =\operatorname{diag}(p_1,\ldots ,p_{d_A})\) and \(\tau =\operatorname{tr}_A\rho \). Then \(\Phi _\rho \) is completely positive and trace preserving,
and application of \(\Phi _\rho \) to the first half of \(\sum _{i,j}\sqrt{p_ip_j}\, E_{ij}\otimes E_{ij}\), followed by restoring the order of the two factors, reconstructs \(\rho \).
Every positive semidefinite matrix \(M \in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) admits a decomposition \(M=U\operatorname{diag}(\sigma )U^{\dagger }\), where \(U \in \mathcal{U}(D)\) is unitary and \(\sigma : \{ 0,\ldots ,D-1\} \to \mathbb {R}_{\ge 0}\) has non-negative entries.
Let \(\eta {\gt}0\) and \(1\le k{\lt}D\). Then \(T_\eta \) is \(k\)-positive if and only if \(\eta \ge k\). This is [ Wol12 , Equation (3.11) ] for \(1\le k{\lt}D\); the top index \(k=D\), where \(k\)-positivity is complete positivity, is Theorem 4.5.1.4.
Let \(\eta {\gt}0\) and \(D\ge 1\). Then \(T_\eta \) is \(D\)-positive if and only if \(\eta \ge D\). Together with Theorem 4.5.1.3 this is [ Wol12 , Equation (3.11) ] over the full range \(1\le k\le D\), where the top index \(k=D\) is complete positivity.
For a pure state \(|\psi \rangle \langle \psi |\) on \(M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\otimes M_{k}(\mathbb {C})\) with \(\operatorname{SR}(\psi )\le n\) and any \(n\)-positive map \(T\colon M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{r}(\mathbb {C})\), applying \(T\) to the first factor keeps the result positive semidefinite: \((T\otimes \operatorname{id}_k)(|\psi \rangle \langle \psi |)\ge 0\).
Applying \(T_\eta \) to the first factor of a bipartite matrix \(\rho \) gives
where \(\rho _2\) is the reduced density of \(\rho \) on the second factor.
For a pure state \(|\psi \rangle \langle \psi |\) on the square bipartite system \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\otimes M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) with \(\operatorname{SR}(\psi )\le n\) and \(1\le n{\lt}D\), applying \(T_n\) to the first factor keeps the result positive semidefinite: \((T_n\otimes \operatorname{id})(|\psi \rangle \langle \psi |)\ge 0\).
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be positive, and let \(T^*\) denote its adjoint for the trace pairing. Then \(T\) is irreducible if and only if \(T^*\) is irreducible. This is the observation at local source lines 604–606, immediately preceding [ Wol12 , Theorem 6.3 ] .
For a linear map \(P\colon M_{d'}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\) with Choi matrix \(\tau _P\) and any bipartite matrix \(\rho \) on \(\mathbb {C}^d\otimes \mathbb {C}^{d'}\),
where \(P^{*}\colon M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{d'}(\mathbb {C})\) is the trace-pairing adjoint of \(P\).
Let \(A\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be Hermitian and suppose that \(\operatorname{Re}\operatorname{tr}(A)\ge 0\). If
then \(A\) is positive semidefinite.
This is the trace-non-negative form of the converse in [ Wol12 , Proposition 3.7 ] . The unrestricted squared implication printed there is false without a trace-sign condition: for \(A=-\mathbb {1}\), one has \(\operatorname{tr}(A)^2=D^2\ge D(D-1)=(D-1)\operatorname{tr}(A^2)\), although \(A\) is not positive semidefinite.
For every \(A\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), with \(\lvert A\rvert =\sqrt{A^\dagger A}\) the positive-semidefinite square root of \(A^\dagger A\),
This is the formula \(\lVert A\rVert _1=\operatorname{tr}[\lvert A\rvert ]\) of [ Wol12 , Chapter 8, Section 8.1 ] ; the trace of the positive-semidefinite matrix \(\lvert A\rvert \) is real.
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be positive and trace preserving, let \(\rho \) be a density operator, and let \(n{\gt}0\). Then
Here the displayed transfer-matrix norm equals \(\lVert T^n-T_\varphi ^n\rVert _{2\to 2}\), the Hilbert–Schmidt operator norm of the corresponding superoperator. The explicit \(n{\gt}0\) records the paper’s positive-natural convention: at \(n=0\), both superoperator powers are the identity, so the displayed right-hand side vanishes. This is the upper assertion of [ Wol12 , Chapter 8, Proposition “Convergence towards asymptotic states”, Eqs. (8.112), (8.114)–(8.116) ] .
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D'}(\mathbb {C})\) be a trace-preserving positive linear map. Then for all Hermitian \(H\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), \(\lVert T(H)\rVert _{\operatorname{tr}}\leq \lVert H\rVert _{\operatorname{tr}}\). See [ Wol12 , Chapter 8, Theorem 8.16 ] .
For every \(A\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\),
Also, \(\lVert A\rVert _{\operatorname{tr}}=0\) if and only if \(A=0\). Equivalently, \(\lVert A\rVert _{\operatorname{tr}}{\gt}0\) if and only if \(A\neq 0\).
For every \(A\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\),
The first inequality is the \(p=1\), \(p'=2\) case of [ Wol12 , Eq. (8.1) ] ; the second is the corresponding case of [ Wol12 , Eq. (8.7) ] . Both are used in the proof of trace-norm convergence toward asymptotic states.
The Schatten one-norm and trace norm are the sums over the finite support of the singular-value sequence. Equivalently, the trace norm is the sum over the indices below the rank of the represented linear map.
For all \(A,B\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), \(\lVert A+B\rVert _{\operatorname{tr}} \leq \lVert A\rVert _{\operatorname{tr}}+\lVert B\rVert _{\operatorname{tr}}\). Together with homogeneity (Theorem 13.1.6) and definiteness (Theorem 13.1.4), this completes the norm axioms of [ Wol12 , Chapter 8, Section 8.1 ] for the trace norm.
For all unitaries \(U,V\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) and every \(A\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\),
The trace norm is thus unitarily invariant [ Wol12 , Chapter 8, Section 8.1 ] .
For every \(A\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\),
and the maximum is attained: some unitary \(U\) satisfies \(\operatorname{tr}[A^\dagger U]=\lVert A\rVert _{\operatorname{tr}}\). See [ Wol12 , Chapter 8, Eq. (8.11) ] .
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D'}(\mathbb {C})\) be a positive map such that \(T^*(\mathbb {1})\) is positive definite. Put \(X=(T^*(\mathbb {1}))^{-1/2}\). Then \(\rho \mapsto T(X\rho X^\dagger )\) is positive and trace-preserving.
For every linear map \(E : M_{D}(\mathbb {C}) \to M_{D'}(\mathbb {C})\), every \(\rho \in M_{D'}(\mathbb {C})\), and every \(X \in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), one has
On any finite full matrix algebra, a linear endomorphism \(S\) is trace-preserving if and only if its trace-pairing adjoint fixes the identity:
For \(p\in [0,1]\), PSD matrices \(A_1,A_2\), and \(t\in [0,1]\),
This follows from operator concavity of \(x\mapsto x^p\) composed with trace monotonicity on the Loewner order.
For \(p\in [1,2]\), PSD matrices \(A_1,A_2\), and \(t\in [0,1]\),
This follows from operator convexity of \(x\mapsto x^p\) composed with trace monotonicity on the Loewner order.
For linear maps \(S,T:M_D(\mathbb C)\to M_D(\mathbb C)\),
For a linear map \(S:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), let \(\lVert S\rVert _{2\to 2}\) be its operator norm for the Hilbert–Schmidt norm. Then
where the norm on the transfer matrix is its largest-singular-value norm. The transfer representation also preserves subtraction and powers.
If \(T(X)=\sum _j K_jXK_j^\dagger \), then the column-stacking convention gives
Wolf’s Equation (2.21) prints the two Kronecker factors in the opposite order; the difference is the simultaneous product-index permutation induced by the vectorization convention.
For every nonnegative integer \(N\),
where the second trace is the operator trace of the endomorphism of \(M_D(\mathbb C)\).
Let \(\mathcal{E}_K\) be the Kraus map of a finite matrix family \(K\). Assume that \(\mathcal{E}_K\) is irreducible and unital and has a positive-definite adjoint fixed point. Then there exist \(m\geq 1\) and a primitive \(m\)-th root of unity \(\gamma \) such that the peripheral eigenvalues of \(\mathcal{E}_K\) are exactly \(\{ 1,\gamma ,\gamma ^2,\ldots ,\gamma ^{m-1}\} \).
Every invertible transfer matrix \(\widehat{T}\) of a linear super-operator \(T : M_{D}(\mathbb {C}) \to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) admits a singular value decomposition \(\widehat{T}=U\operatorname{diag}(\sigma )V^{\dagger }\) with \(U,V\) unitary on \(\mathbb {C}^{D}\otimes \mathbb {C}^{D}\) and \(\sigma _i{\gt}0\).
The matrix transposition map \(\theta (X)=X^T\) on \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) is positive and trace-preserving.
For a bipartite vector \(\psi \in \mathbb {C}^{d_A}\otimes \mathbb {C}^{d_B}\) with coefficient matrix \(C\) and any linear map \(T\) with domain \(M_{d_B}(\mathbb {C})\),
Let \(N\in \mathbb {N}\) with \(N\ge 1\), let \(p\ge 0\) and \(\gamma _*{\gt}0\), and let \(\rho _t=\Phi _t(\rho )\) for matrices \(\rho ,\omega \in M_{2^N}(\mathbb {C})\). Assume at the time under consideration that
If
then \(\lVert \rho _t-\omega \rVert _1\le N^{-p}\). The complete modified logarithmic Sobolev estimate motivating the first hypothesis is [ GR22 , Theorems 1.1 and 3.3 ] ; that estimate, its tensorization, and quantum Pinsker remain hypotheses here.
- PauliDissipation.q3_traceNorm_le_rpow_of_logarithmic_time
- PauliDissipation.squared_trace_distance_bound_of_entropy_decay_and_pinsker
- PauliDissipation.squared_trace_distance_le_rpow_of_exp_threshold
- PauliDissipation.q3_traceNorm_sq_bound_of_entropy_decay_and_pinsker
- PauliDissipation.q3_exp_threshold_of_logarithmic_time
Suppose \(a\ne b\) and \(\gamma _a,\gamma _b{\gt}0\). For \(X\in M_{2}(\mathbb {C})\), \(\mathcal L_{a,b}(X)=0\) if and only if \(X\in \mathbb {C}\mathbb {1}\).
For Pauli directions \(a,b,k\in \{ x,y,z\} \) and real rates \(\gamma _a,\gamma _b\),
Hence, when \(a\ne b\), the eigenvalues on \(\sigma _a\), \(\sigma _b\), and the remaining Pauli matrix are respectively \(-2\gamma _b\), \(-2\gamma _a\), and \(-2(\gamma _a+\gamma _b)\).
For Pauli directions \(a,b\in \{ x,y,z\} \), real rates \(\gamma _a,\gamma _b\), and all \(X,Y\in M_{2}(\mathbb {C})\),
Suppose \(a\ne b\) and \(\gamma _a,\gamma _b{\gt}0\). The state \(\tau _1\) is positive definite and belongs to \(\mathcal{D}_2\). Furthermore, \(\mathcal L_{a,b}(\tau _1)=0\), the kernel of \(\mathcal L_{a,b}\) is the one-dimensional space \(\mathbb {C}\tau _1\), and \(e^{t\mathcal L_{a,b}}(\tau _1)=\tau _1\) for every \(t\ge 0\). More generally, for \(X\in M_{2}(\mathbb {C})\),
The same equivalence holds for any autonomous semigroup \(T_t\) satisfying \(T_t=e^{t\mathcal L_{a,b}}\) at every non-negative time.
- PauliDissipation.twoPauliGenerator_hasSimpleFaithfulKernel
- PauliDissipation.maximallyMixed_posDef
- PauliDissipation.maximallyMixed_mem_densityMatrices
- PauliDissipation.twoPauliGenerator_maximallyMixed
- PauliDissipation.twoPauliGenerator_hasSimpleKernel
- PauliDissipation.expSemigroup_fixed_iff_scalar
- PauliDissipation.autonomousSemigroup_fixed_iff_scalar
- PauliDissipation.expSemigroup_fixes_maximallyMixed
Let \(E:M_{D_{\rm in}}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D_{\rm out}}(\mathbb {C})\) be a \(2\)-positive complex-linear map. For every \(A,B\in M_{D_{\rm in}}(\mathbb {C})\),
where \((\cdot )^+\) is the Moore–Penrose pseudoinverse, i.e. the inverse taken on the range. No vector witness is assumed to exist.
Let \(E:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be a positive linear map such that, for a given \(B\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), the per-\(B\) Schwarz hypothesis holds (Definition 6.9.2.7). Then for every \(A\in \mathcal{A}_B\) (Definition 6.9.2.8) and every \(X\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\),
This is the source’s equality theorem, local source Notes/WolfNoteTexSource/ch05_schwarz_inequalities.tex, line 198.
Let \(E:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be a Kraus map satisfying \(E(\mathbb {1})=\mathbb {1}\). Every eigenvalue \(\mu \) of \(E\) satisfies
This is the unital Kraus specialization of [ Wol12 , Proposition 6.1 ] .
Let \(E:\mathbb C^{I\times I}\to \mathbb C^{I\times I}\) be a completely positive map with \(E(\mathbb {1})=\mathbb {1}\). Then the spectral radius of its Frobenius transport is at most one.
Let \(E:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be a Kraus map satisfying \(E(\mathbb {1})=\mathbb {1}\). Then, for every \(X\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\),
Let \(e:H\simeq I\) be an equivalence of finite index sets and let \(U\) be a unitary matrix indexed by \(I\). Define
and
Both \(\Phi \) and \(\Phi ^{-1}\) are trace-preserving and completely positive.
Let \(e:H\simeq I\) be an equivalence of finite index sets and let \(U\) be a unitary matrix indexed by \(I\). The mutually inverse coordinate changes
and
both preserve positive semidefiniteness.
For every \(A\in M_D(\mathbb C)\), including \(D=0\), there are a unitary matrix \(U\) and an upper-triangular matrix \(R\) such that
Moreover, a complex number \(z\) is an eigenvalue of \(A\) if and only if \(R_{ii}=z\) for some \(i\).
Let \(I\) and \(J\) be finite index sets, let \(\Phi :\mathbb C^{I\times I}\to \mathbb C^{J\times J}\) be completely positive and trace preserving, and let \(\sigma \) and \(\tau \) be positive definite matrices satisfying \(\Phi (\sigma )=\tau \). Then, for every \(X\),
Equivalently, \(L\) is a Hilbert–Schmidt contraction. This is the full-support exponent-two specialization of [ Bei13 , Theorem 6, Equation (18) ] ; it does not assert the support-compressed form for a singular output weight.
Let \(\Phi :\mathbb C^{I\times I}\to \mathbb C^{J\times J}\) be completely positive and trace preserving, let \(\sigma {\gt}0\), and set \(\tau =\Phi (\sigma )\). Then, for every \(X\),
Equivalently, \(L_{\operatorname {supp}}\) is a Hilbert–Schmidt contraction. This is the exponent-two specialization of [ Bei13 , Theorem 6, Equation (18) ] , including singular output weights.
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be positive and trace preserving, and let \(\rho \succeq 0\) be a fixed point of \(T\) whose rank bounds the rank of every fixed-point density matrix. Then every fixed point \(X\) of \(T\) arises as \(X=\sqrt{\rho }\, Y\sqrt{\rho }\) for a corner-supported \(Y\) with \(\sqrt{\rho }\, Y\sqrt{\rho }\) fixed by \(T\).
In the setting of Theorem 10.8.20, every fixed point \(X\) of \(T\) with \(QXQ=X\) arises as \(X=\sqrt{\rho }\, Y\sqrt{\rho }\) for a corner-supported \(Y\) with \(\sqrt{\rho }\, Y\sqrt{\rho }\) fixed by \(T\).
Let \(T(X)=\sum _iK_iXK_i^\dagger \) be trace-preserving, let \(\rho \succeq 0\) satisfy \(T(\rho )=\rho \), and let \(Q\) be the support projection of \(\rho \). The corner elements \(Y\in QM_{D}(\mathbb {C})Q\) such that \(\sqrt{\rho }\, Y\sqrt{\rho }\) is a fixed point of \(T\) form a \(*\)-subalgebra of the corner algebra \(QM_{D}(\mathbb {C})Q\).
Let \(T(X)=\sum _iK_iXK_i^\dagger \) be trace-preserving, and let \(\rho {\gt}0\) satisfy \(T(\rho )=\rho \). If \(F_T:=\{ X\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\mid T(X)=X\} \), then \(\rho ^{-1/2}F_T\rho ^{-1/2}\) is a \(*\)-subalgebra of \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\).
Let \(\rho \) and \(\sigma \) be matrices on \(\mathcal H_S\otimes \mathbb C^{d_C}\), with \(\sigma \) positive semidefinite, and set \(\overline\sigma =(\operatorname{tr}_C\sigma )\otimes d_C^{-1}\mathbf1_C\). If the identity summand obeys the support sandwich identity
then the raw support Petz map recovers \(\rho \): \(\mathcal R_\sigma (\operatorname{tr}_C\rho )=\rho \). This is the algebraic reduction in [ HJPW04 , Theorem 3, equation (8) ] . It does not derive the support sandwich identity from equality of relative entropies.
Let \(A,B\in M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\) be Hermitian. If \(A\leq B\), then their decreasingly ordered eigenvalues satisfy
This is the consequence of [ Wol12 , Equation (5.56) ] used immediately before Proposition 5.3.
Fix a dimension \(d\ge 1\) and a primitive \(d\)-th root of unity \(\zeta \). The cyclic shift \(X\), the clock operator \(Z\), and every Weyl operator \(W(a,b)=X^aZ^b\) are unitary.
For the positive definite finite-Weyl family, let
and define \(\operatorname{Def}_B(t)\) analogously, with the real parts of the corresponding source-\(B\) pairings. Then both defects are non-negative and continuous for \(t{\gt}0\), and
The integrand is continuous, non-negative, and integrable on \((0,\infty )\). The coefficient of the source-\(B\) defect is exactly \(t\), as prescribed by the integral formula and equality analysis of Jenčová–Ruskai, arXiv:0903.2895v4, §4.
- Matrix.weightedWeylConjugate
- Matrix.weightedWeylAverage
- Matrix.weylSourceAResolventDefect
- Matrix.weylSourceBResolventDefect
- Matrix.weylRelativeEntropyGap
- Matrix.weyl_relativeEntropy_gap_integral
- Matrix.weylSourceAResolventDefect_continuousOn
- Matrix.weylSourceBResolventDefect_continuousOn
- Matrix.weylSourceAResolventDefect_nonneg
- Matrix.weylSourceBResolventDefect_nonneg
- Matrix.weylRelativeEntropyGapIntegrand_integrableOn
- Matrix.weylRelativeEntropyGapIntegrand_continuousOn
- Matrix.weylRelativeEntropyGapIntegrand_nonneg
Under the positive-definite finite-Weyl hypotheses, suppose that \(\sum _gD(A_g\Vert B_g)-D(A\Vert B)=0\). Then \(\operatorname{Def}_B(t)=0\) for every \(t{\gt}0\), and consequently \(T_g^{-1}(B_g)=T^{-1}(B)\) for every \(t{\gt}0\) and every Weyl index \(g\). In particular, equality of relative entropy under the right partial trace implies this conclusion by Theorem 13.6.12. This is the positive-definite conclusion of the equality argument in Jenčová–Ruskai, arXiv:0903.2895v4, §4 and Appendix. It makes no assertion at \(t=0\) or for singular inputs.
Let \(\rho \) and \(\sigma \) be positive definite on \(\mathcal H_S\otimes \mathbb C^{d_C}\), let \(q=d_C^{-2}\), and put
where \(U_g=\mathbf1_S\otimes W_g\). For \(t{\gt}0\), let
Then
This is the positive-definite, fixed-\(t\) identity in Jenčová–Ruskai, arXiv:0903.2895v4, Appendix, lines 1313–1343. It does not infer zero defect from equality of relative entropies and makes no assertion about singular supports.
Under the hypotheses and notation of the preceding theorem, suppose that
Then \(T_g^{-1}(B_g)=T^{-1}(B)\) for every Weyl index \(g\). In particular this holds for the identity Weyl element \(g=(0,0)\). This is the common-resolvent conclusion in Jenčová–Ruskai, arXiv:0903.2895v4, §4, lines 652–674; its squared-defect input is in Appendix, lines 1313–1343. This fixed-\(t\), positive-definite conclusion does not assert that equality of relative entropies implies the scalar hypothesis in (142).
Under the notation of Theorem 13.6.26, set \(\Gamma _t=T^{-1}(A)\). Then, for every \(t{\gt}0\),
This is the second defect family in Jenčová–Ruskai, arXiv:0903.2895v4, §4 and Appendix.
Fix a dimension \(d\ge 1\) and a primitive \(d\)-th root of unity \(\zeta \), and let \(X\) be the cyclic shift \(|i\rangle \mapsto |i+1\rangle \) and \(Z=\operatorname{diag}(\zeta ^0,\ldots ,\zeta ^{d-1})\) the clock operator. For every matrix \(M\) on \(\mathbb {C}^d\), the uniform average of the conjugations by the \(d^2\) Weyl operators \(W(a,b)=X^aZ^b\) is the completely depolarizing channel:
Let \(F\) be a bijection of the normalized pure states \(P_p\) such that \(\operatorname{tr}(F(P)F(Q))=\operatorname{tr}(PQ)\) for all normalized pure states \(P,Q\). Then there is a unitary \(U\) such that either \(F(P)=UPU^\dagger \) for every \(P\), or \(F(P)=UP^{\mathsf T}U^\dagger \) for every \(P\). This is a disjunction, not an exclusive alternative. For \(d=0\) the set of pure states is empty, while for \(d=1\) it is a singleton and the two alternatives coincide.
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be positive and trace preserving, and suppose that \(T^*\) satisfies the Schwarz inequality. There are positive integers \(d_k,m_k\), positive definite density matrices \(\sigma _k\in M_{m_k}(\mathbb {C})\), a non-negative integer \(d_0\), and a unitary \(U\) associated with a decomposition
This is [ Wol12 , Theorem 6.14 and Equation (6.63) ] . The two tensor factors are interchanged from the displayed convention in the reference; the interchange is a unitary change of basis on each summand.
This is Wolf, Chapter 6, Theorem 6.16, Equations (6.66)–(6.68), local source lines 1597–1664, under the separately retained trace-adjoint-Schwarz contract required by the printed proof’s invocation of Theorem 6.14. Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be positive and trace preserving, with \(D{\gt}0\). Suppose separately that \(T\) and its trace-pairing adjoint \(T^*\) satisfy the Schwarz inequality. There are zero-extended density-block coordinates \(E\), positive integers \(d_k,m_k\), density matrices \(\sigma _k\in M_{m_k}(\mathbb {C})\), a permutation \(\pi \) of the blocks, and unitaries \(V_k\in M_{d_k}(\mathbb {C})\) such that
If \(q_k:\{ 0,\ldots ,d_{\pi (k)}{-}1\} \simeq \{ 0,\ldots ,d_k{-}1\} \) is the canonical reindexing, the coordinate action \(A\) and its ambient realization are
Here \(\pi \) is explicitly the output-to-input permutation: output block \(k\) reads input block \(\pi (k)\). In the formal coordinates the tensor order is \(\sigma _k\otimes X_k\); Wolf’s displayed \(X_k\otimes \rho _k\) differs by the canonical tensor-factor swap.
The compiled statement retains the equivalence \(e_0\) and the literal zero extension \(\operatorname {fromBlocks}(0,0,0,-)\) while also proving \(n=D\). This records Equations (6.66)–(6.67) without a dependent rewrite that erases Wolf’s zero-summand form. The inverse used to classify each matched block is only the inverse on the peripheral image; no inverse of the ambient map \(T\) is asserted.
Let \(E\) be a completely positive map on \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\). Then \(E\) is irreducible if and only if, for every \(t{\gt}0\) and every nonzero \(A\geq 0\), one has \(\exp (tE)(A){\gt}0\). This is the completely positive specialization of the equivalence in [ Wol12 , Theorem 6.2(3) ] ; Theorem 8.13.1 is its forward implication.
Each assertion that the corresponding property holds for every sufficiently large \(m\) is equivalent to the existence of a threshold with Wolf’s explicit universal quantifier:
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be completely positive and trace preserving, with the Kraus decomposition above. Then the following are equivalent:
\(T\) is primitive: it is irreducible and its peripheral spectrum consists only of \(1\);
there is an \(n\in \mathbb N\) such that, for every \(m\geq n\) and every nonzero \(\psi \in \mathbb {C}^D\), \(K_m|\psi \rangle =\mathbb {C}^D\);
there is a \(q\in \mathbb N\) such that \(K_m=M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) for every \(m\geq q\);
there is a \(q\in \mathbb N\) such that \(\tau _m{\gt}0\) for every \(m\geq q\).
The thresholds in items 3 and 4 can be chosen equal. If \(n\) and \(q\) are chosen minimal, then \(n\leq q\). This is [ Wol12 , Theorem 6.8 ] .
Let \(d\ge 1\), and let \(T:M_d(\mathbb C)\to M_d(\mathbb C)\) be positive and trace preserving. Write \(T_\phi \) for the peripheral spectral projection and
with \(\mu =0\) when the displayed set is empty. After the canonical identification of the transfer-matrix coordinates with \(\mathbb C^{d^2}\), there are a unitary \(U\), a diagonal matrix \(\Lambda \), and a strictly upper-triangular matrix \(N\) such that
For every \(n\in \mathbb N\) satisfying \(d^2-1\le n\),
If \(2(d^2-1)\le n\), the factor \((d^2-1)n^{d^2-1}\) may be replaced by \((d^2-1)\binom {n}{d^2-1}\).
The statement includes \(\mu =0\) without division. When \(d=1\) and \(n=0\), both estimates reduce to \(0\le 1\); this boundary is included even though the auxiliary positive-power identity does not hold there.
Let \(d{\gt}0\). The map
is continuous. Its unit-vector domain is path connected, and hence the set of rank-one pure-state projections in \(M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\) is connected.
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be a trace-preserving, positive, linear map for which \(T^*\) satisfies the Schwarz inequality. For every density matrix \(\rho \) which is a maximum-rank fixed point of \(T\), the set
is a \(*\)-algebra, with the inverse taken on \(\operatorname{supp}(\rho )\). This is [ Wol12 , Corollary 6.7 ] .
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be positive and trace preserving, with \(D{\gt}0\), and suppose that \(T^*\) is Schwarz. Choose the zero-extended density-block coordinates of the recurrent projection from Theorem 10.9.6, in the formal tensor-factor order \(\sigma _k\otimes X_k\), and let \(E\) and \(R\) denote their embedding and compression maps. If \(S\) is the recurrent inverse from Theorem 10.11.3, set
Then \(\bar T\) and \(\bar S\) are mutually inverse positive maps on \(\bigoplus _{k{\lt}K}M_{d_k}(\mathbb {C})\) and preserve the total trace. There is an equivalence \(\tau :\{ 0,\ldots ,K{-}1\} \simeq \{ 0,\ldots ,K{-}1\} \) such that, with Wolf’s output-to-input permutation \(\pi =\tau ^{-1}\),
Every matched block map and its inverse is positive, preserves the ordinary matrix trace, and the two compositions are identities. The conclusion compares only the full-matrix dimensions \(d_k\).
This is exactly the relative-pure-state, connectedness, and block permutation step at source lines 1641–1659 of Wolf’s proof of Theorem 6.16. It does not compare the multiplicities \(m_k\), transport the ordinary Schwarz inequality to the matched block maps, assemble the exclusion of the transpose alternative, or prove Equation (6.68); those are assembled in Theorem 10.11.7 below.
- Matrix.densityBlockWithZeroEmbedding
- Matrix.densityBlockWithZeroEmbedding_apply
- Matrix.densityBlockWithZeroCompression
- Matrix.densityBlockWithZeroCompression_apply
- Matrix.densityBlockWithZeroCompression_embedding
- Matrix.densityBlockWithZeroCompression_posSemidef
- Matrix.densityBlockWithZeroEmbedding_posSemidef
- Matrix.densityBlockWithZeroEmbedding_posSemidef_iff
- Matrix.trace_densityBlockWithZeroEmbedding
- Matrix.densityBlockWithZeroEmbedding_mem_densityMatrices_iff
- Matrix.densityBlockWithZeroEmbedding_fixed
- Matrix.densityBlockWithZeroEmbedding_compression_of_fixed
- Matrix.densityBlockDynamics
- Matrix.densityBlockDynamics_apply
- Matrix.densityBlockWithZeroEmbedding_densityBlockDynamics
- Matrix.densityBlockWithZeroEmbedding_densityBlockRestrictedInverse
- Matrix.densityBlockRestrictedInverse_comp_densityBlockDynamics
- Matrix.densityBlockDynamics_comp_densityBlockRestrictedInverse
- Matrix.densityBlockDynamics_isPositiveDirectSumMap
- Matrix.densityBlockDynamics_isTracePreservingBetweenDirectSums
- IsPositiveMap.exists_peripheralDensityBlockDynamics
- Matrix.IsPositiveBetweenDirectSums
- Matrix.directSumBlockMap
- Matrix.IsPositiveBetweenDirectSums.mapsTo_directSumDensityMatrices
- Matrix.mapsTo_extremePoints_directSumDensityMatrices_of_mutualInverse
- Matrix.DirectSumFacePermutation
- Matrix.exists_directSumFacePermutation_of_mutualInverse
- Matrix.DirectSumFacePermutation.map_apply
- Matrix.DirectSumFacePermutation.inverse_apply
- IsPositiveMap.exists_peripheralDensityBlockFacePermutation
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be positive and trace preserving, with \(D{\gt}0\). Suppose separately that \(T\) and its trace-pairing adjoint \(T^*\) satisfy the Schwarz inequality. In the density-block coordinates and notation of Theorem 10.11.4, the zero summand has dimension zero and
If \(\tau \) is the source-to-target block permutation, then
For every \(X\in M_{d_i}(\mathbb {C})\), the raw matched block map satisfies
Transporting along \(d_i=d_{\tau (i)}\) gives an endomorphism of \(M_{d_i}(\mathbb {C})\) with the ordinary Schwarz property. Together with the matched block conclusions of Theorem 10.11.4, this endomorphism is positive, trace preserving, bijective, and has a positive inverse, exactly the hypotheses needed for the subsequent exclusion of matrix transposition.
Two printed dimension defects are kept explicit. At source line 1499, \(\rho _k\in M_{m_k}(\mathbb {C})\) and the full algebra acts on the \(d_k\) factor, so the compatible identity is \(\mathbb {1}_{d_k}\otimes \rho _k\), not the printed \(\mathbb {1}_{m_k}\otimes \rho _k\); in the formal tensor-factor order this is \(\sigma _k\otimes \mathbb {1}_{d_k}\). At source lines 1614–1616 the statement asks \(\pi \) to preserve the dimension \(d_km_k\) of the whole space \(\mathcal H_k\), whereas the pure-face argument at lines 1653–1656 proves only equality of \(d_k\). The equality of \(m_k\) in (95) supplies the missing comparison.
- Matrix.densityBlockWithZeroPrincipalCompression
- Matrix.densityBlockWithZeroPrincipalCompression_apply
- Matrix.densityBlockWithZeroPrincipalCompression_embedding
- Matrix.densityBlockWithZeroPrincipalCompression_one
- Matrix.densityBlockWithZeroPrincipalCompression_posSemidef
- Matrix.densityBlockWithZeroEmbedding_eq_one_dimension
- Matrix.densityBlockWithZeroEmbedding_eq_one_block
- Matrix.densityBlockWithZeroEmbedding_eq_one
- Matrix.exists_densityBlockIdentityCoordinates
- Matrix.densityBlockWithZeroEmbedding_single_conjTranspose_mul
- Matrix.densityBlockMap_fixed_identityCoordinates
- Matrix.DirectSumFacePermutation.multiplicity_eq_of_fixed_scalar_identity
- Matrix.DirectSumFacePermutation.blockMap_one_of_fixed_scalar_identity
- Matrix.DirectSumFacePermutation.rawBlock_isSchwarzMap_of_ambientDensityBlocks
- IsPositiveMap.map_one_and_peripheralProjection_one_of_tracePreserving_of_isSchwarzMap
- Matrix.DirectSumFacePermutation.matchedBlockEndomorphism
- Matrix.DirectSumFacePermutation.matchedBlockInverseEndomorphism
- Matrix.DirectSumFacePermutation.matchedBlockEndomorphism_apply
- Matrix.DirectSumFacePermutation.matchedBlockInverseEndomorphism_apply
- Matrix.DirectSumFacePermutation.matchedBlockEndomorphism_isPositiveMap
- Matrix.DirectSumFacePermutation.matchedBlockInverseEndomorphism_isPositiveMap
- Matrix.DirectSumFacePermutation.matchedBlockEndomorphism_isTracePreservingMap
- Matrix.DirectSumFacePermutation.matchedBlockInverseEndomorphism_isTracePreservingMap
- Matrix.DirectSumFacePermutation.matchedBlockEndomorphism_leftInverse
- Matrix.DirectSumFacePermutation.matchedBlockEndomorphism_rightInverse
- Matrix.DirectSumFacePermutation.matchedBlockInverseEndomorphism_comp
- Matrix.DirectSumFacePermutation.matchedBlockEndomorphism_comp_inverse
- Matrix.DirectSumFacePermutation.matchedBlockEndomorphism_bijective
- Matrix.DirectSumFacePermutation.matchedBlockInverseEndomorphism_eq_canonicalInverse
- Matrix.DirectSumFacePermutation.matchedBlockCanonicalInverse_isPositiveMap
- Matrix.DirectSumFacePermutation.matchedBlockEndomorphism_isSchwarzMap_of_raw
- IsPositiveMap.exists_peripheralDensityBlockSchwarz
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be positive and trace preserving, with \(D{\gt}0\), and write \(I=T_\phi \) for its recurrent/peripheral projection. There are a strictly increasing sequence of positive integers \((n_i)\) and a positive trace-preserving map \(S\) such that
The map \(I\) is positive and trace preserving. Moreover, \(S\) and \(I\) have the same range. Hence \(S\) and \(T\) are mutual inverses on \(\operatorname {ran}I=\mathcal{X}_T\); this is not a global inverse claim. If \(T\) is Schwarz, then \(I\) is Schwarz. If, separately, \(T^*\) is Schwarz, then \(I^*\) is Schwarz.
This is the recurrent-projection and positive-inverse step at lines 1629–1640 of the proof of [ Wol12 , Theorem 6.16 ] , under the corrected two-orientation contract used by that printed proof.
- IsPositiveMap.exists_strictMono_tendsto_pow_peripheralProjection_and_predecessor
- IsPositiveMap.peripheralProjection_isPositiveMap
- IsPositiveMap.peripheralProjection_isTracePreservingMap
- IsPositiveMap.peripheralProjection_isSchwarzMap
- IsPositiveMap.traceAdjointMap_peripheralProjection_isSchwarzMap
- IsPositiveMap.exists_peripheralRestrictedInverse
- Module.End.peripheralRestrictedInverse_apply_map_of_mem_range
- Module.End.map_peripheralRestrictedInverse_apply_of_mem_range
Let \(d{\gt}0\), and let \(T:M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\) be a positive, trace-preserving bijection whose inverse is positive. If \(T\) satisfies the Schwarz inequality in (16), then there is a unitary \(U\) such that
This is the final classification step at lines 1660–1663 of Wolf’s proof of Theorem 6.16.
- ChannelDeterminant.Internal.transposeLinearMapComplex_not_isSchwarzMap
- ChannelDeterminant.Internal.isSchwarzMap_of_unitaryChannel_comp
- ChannelDeterminant.Internal.unitaryChannel_comp_transpose_not_isSchwarzMap
- ChannelDeterminant.Internal.unitaryChannel_comp_transpose_fin_one
- ChannelDeterminant.Internal.wolfPositiveInvertibleSchwarzMaps
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be positive and trace preserving, with \(D{\gt}0\), and suppose that \(T\) is Schwarz. Then \(T(\mathbb {1})=\mathbb {1}\). For \(m,d{\gt}0\), positivity of \(\mathbb {1}_m\otimes B\) implies \(B\succeq 0\). If \(\operatorname{tr}(\sigma )=1\) and \(\sigma \otimes X=\mathbb {1}_{md}\), then \(\sigma =m^{-1}\mathbb {1}_m\) and \(X=m\mathbb {1}_d\).
These auxiliary facts are used below in the matched-multiplicity comparison and the transport of the ambient Schwarz defect to an individual weighted full-matrix block map at source lines 1660–1663. This is not a modified-product argument.
Let \(D\geq 1\) and let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be irreducible and positive. There are a density matrix \(X{\gt}0\) and a real number \(r\geq 0\) such that \(T(X)=rX\) and the following assertions hold.
Every lower feasible value is at most \(r\), every upper feasible value is at least \(r\), and \((X,r)\) is feasible in both senses. Thus \(r\) is the global maximum of the lower values and the global minimum of the upper values.
The ordinary complex eigenspace at \(r\) is \(\mathbb {C}X\), and hence has dimension one. No assertion about the generalized eigenspace is made.
If \(Y\geq 0\) is nonzero, \(\lambda {\gt}0\), and \(T(Y)=\lambda Y\), then \(\lambda =r\).
The spectral radius satisfies \(\varrho (T)=r\).
If \(T\neq 0\), the same conclusions hold with \(r{\gt}0\). This is the source form of [ Wol12 , Theorem 6.3 ] .
The boundary \(r=0\) is necessary without the hypothesis \(T\neq 0\). On \(M_{1}(\mathbb {C})\) the zero map is positive and irreducible because the only orthogonal projections are \(0\) and \(\mathbb {1}\), but its spectral radius is zero. The printed claim that the distinguished eigenvalue is strictly positive therefore omits this one-dimensional case.
Let \(T:M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\) be a completely positive linear map with Kraus rank at most two. Then
No trace-preservation hypothesis is assumed. This is the proposition “Positive determinant for small Kraus rank” in [ Wol12 , Chapter 6, Equation (6.26) ] .
Let \(D{\gt}0\), and let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be positive, trace preserving, and bijective. Then \(T^{-1}\) is positive if and only if there is a unitary \(U\) for which
This is the corollary “Positive invertible maps” following [ Wol12 , Theorem 6.1 ] .
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be a complex-linear map. The following are equivalent:
\(T\) maps the cone of positive semidefinite matrices onto itself;
\(T\) is positive and preserves the rank of Hermitian matrices;
there is an invertible \(Y\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) such that either \(T(X)=YXY^\dagger \) for every \(X\), or \(T(X)=YX^{\mathsf T}Y^\dagger \) for every \(X\).
This is [ Wol12 , Proposition 3.6 ] .
For a GKSL generator \(L:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), the four conditions
rank-deficient fixed density,
rank-deficient kernel element,
invariant compression, and
block-upper-triangular Lindblad form
are equivalent. This is [ Wol12 , Proposition 7.6 ] .
Let \(\Lambda ,N\in M_D(\mathbb C)\), where \(\Lambda \) is diagonal and \(N\) is strictly upper triangular. Suppose \(\lVert \Lambda \rVert _\infty =\mu \le 1\). If \(D-1\le n\), then
If \(2(D-1)\le n\), the factor \((D-1)n^{D-1}\) may be replaced by \((D-1)\binom {n}{D-1}\).
Let \(D\ge 1\), let \(J_D(\lambda )\) be a Jordan block, and suppose that \(0{\lt}|\lambda |\le 1\) and \(D-1\le n\). Then
At \(D=1\) the inverse-power factor in the first line is interpreted as the zeroth power and hence equals one. This is the fixed-block estimate used in the proof of Wolf’s Equations (8.106)–(8.107), before selecting the largest subperipheral block and comparing the full direct sum.
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be positive and trace preserving, let \(\sigma \) be a density operator with \(T(\sigma )=\sigma \), and let \(Q\) be the support projection of \(\sigma \). Then
for every density operator \(\rho \in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\). This is [ Wol12 , Proposition 6.10 ] .
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be positive and trace preserving, and let \(Q\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be a Hermitian projection. Then the following are equivalent:
every density operator \(\rho \preceq Q\) satisfies \(T(\rho )\preceq Q\);
\(T^*(Q)\succeq Q\).
This is [ Wol12 , Proposition 6.11 ] .
Let \(E=T^*:M_{D_{\rm in}}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D_{\rm out}}(\mathbb {C})\) be a positive complex-linear map. If \(T:M_{D_{\rm out}}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D_{\rm in}}(\mathbb {C})\) is \(2\)-positive, then for all \(A,B\in M_{D_{\rm in}}(\mathbb {C})\),
This is exactly [ Wol12 , Theorem 5.3 and Eq. (5.4) ] , with the inverse taken on the range.
Let \(A,B\in M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\) be Hermitian. The corrected form of [ Wol12 , Proposition 5.3 and Equation (5.57) ] is, with \(\mathcal U(d)\) denoting the unitary matrices,
In particular, the unitary is chosen before the interval and the function; it depends only on \(A\) and \(B\). No continuity hypothesis on \(f\) is required, since both spectra are finite.
Under the hypotheses of Theorem 10.6, suppose in addition that \(\nu (\Lambda )\le 1\). If \(D-1\le n\), then
If \(2(D-1)\le n\), the factor \((D-1)n^{D-1}\) may be replaced by \((D-1)\binom {n}{D-1}\).
Let \(D\ge 1\), let \(\Lambda ,N\in M_D(R)\) for a ring \(R\), assume that \(\Lambda \) is diagonal and that \(N\) is strictly upper triangular, and let \(\nu \) be an arbitrary submultiplicative ring seminorm. Then, for every \(n\in \mathbb N\),
In particular, this applies to every submultiplicative norm in Wolf’s upper-triangular power lemma [ Wol12 , Chapter 8, Equation (8.105) ] .
Let \(N\ge 3\), \(1\le m\le N-2\), and \(x\colon \mathbb {Z}/N\mathbb {Z}\to \mathbb {R}\) be nonnegative. With zero-denominator summands interpreted as zero,
On \(\mathbb {Z}/d\mathbb {Z}\), let
In the range \(d\ge 3\), \(1\le m\le d-2\), and \(s\ge d\), the matrix \(S\) has nonnegative entries, is circulant and invertible, and satisfies
More explicitly, for the unnormalized discrete Fourier transform,
Here \(q_0=0\) and \(q_j{\gt}0\) for \(j\ne 0\). Finally, \(Sx\) is the forward denominator and
- Yamagami.forwardMatrix
- Yamagami.forwardMatrix_apply
- Yamagami.forwardMatrix_mulVec
- Yamagami.forwardMatrix_add_add
- Yamagami.forwardMatrix_eq_circulant
- Yamagami.forwardMatrix_nonnegative
- Yamagami.forwardMatrix_nonnegative_of_sourceRange
- Yamagami.forwardMatrix_mulVec_one
- Yamagami.forwardMatrix_transpose_mulVec_one
- Yamagami.hessianSymbol
- Yamagami.symbol_zero
- Yamagami.hessianSymbol_zero
- Yamagami.hessianSymbol_pos
- Yamagami.hessianSymbol_nonneg
- Yamagami.symbol_ne_zero
- Yamagami.dft_map_forwardMatrix_mulVec
- Yamagami.symbol_neg
- Yamagami.dft_map_transpose_forwardMatrix_mulVec
- Yamagami.dft_map_hessianMatrix_mulVec
- Yamagami.hessianMatrix_forwardMatrix_posSemidef
- Yamagami.hessianMatrix_forwardMatrix_mulVec_eq_zero_iff_isScalarVector
- Yamagami.forwardMatrix_isUnit_det
- Yamagami.functional_eq_lambdaT_inverseOperator_mulVec
Suppose in addition that \(S\) has nonnegative entries, that \(H\) is positive semidefinite, and that \(\ker H=\mathbb {R}\mathbf1\). Then every local maximum of \(f_S\) on \(A_{++}\) is projectively scalar. More precisely, a non-scalar local maximum \(a\) would produce the non-scalar vector
Let \(N\ge 3\), \(2\le m\le N-2\), and \(s\ge N\). Suppose that \(x\colon \mathbb {Z}/N\mathbb {Z}\to \mathbb {R}\) is nonnegative and \(x_{N-1}=0\), and let \(x'\colon \mathbb {Z}/(N-1)\mathbb {Z}\to \mathbb {R}\) be given in the standard cyclic coordinates by \(x'_i=x_i\) for \(0\le i{\lt}N-1\). Then