- Boxes
- definitions
- Ellipses
- theorems and lemmas
- Blue border
- the statement of this result is ready to be formalized; all prerequisites are done
- Orange border
- the statement of this result is not ready to be formalized; the blueprint needs more work
- Blue background
- the proof of this result is ready to be formalized; all prerequisites are done
- Green border
- the statement of this result is formalized
- Green background
- the proof of this result is formalized
- Dark green background
- the proof of this result and all its ancestors are formalized
- Dark green border
- this is in Mathlib
Under the hypotheses of Theorem 20.15.2.27, every absorbed BNT element \(\mathcal K_s\) generates positive semidefinite operators on all nonempty periodic chains. Indeed, \(P_s^{\otimes N}\sigma ^{(N)}(K)P_s^{\otimes N}\geq 0\) and \(n_s{\gt}0\), so (54) gives \(\sigma ^{(N)}(\mathcal K_s)\geq 0\). This is the first positivity conclusion in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1753–1759 ] .
Let \(M\) be an MPO tensor and let its BNT canonical form have normal representatives \(A_x\), copy numbers \(n_x\), and copy-independent weights \(\mu _x\). Put \(\mathcal K_x=\mu _xA_x\), and assume that this canonical form generates the same matrix product vectors as \(M\) at every positive length. If the representatives \(\mathcal K_x\) have orthogonally supported commuting sector products, then
Hence the BNT copy numbers \(n_x\) are the natural multiplicities of the explicit GSNNCH form.
Let \(M\) have a nonempty basis-of-normal-tensors decomposition with positive copy numbers \(n_x\) and copy-independent weights \(\mu _x\). Put \(K_x=\mu _xA_x\), and suppose that the decomposition generates the same positive-length matrix product vectors as \(M\). If an independently supplied orthogonally supported commuting sector family realizes the tensors \(K_x\), and every \(K_x\) satisfies SAL, then \(M\) satisfies SAL.
Let \(M\) be an MPO tensor and let its BNT canonical form have normal representatives \(A_x\), copy numbers \(n_x\), and copy-independent weights \(\mu _x\). Put \(\mathcal K_x=\mu _xA_x\), and assume that this canonical form generates the same matrix product vectors as \(M\) at every positive length. Equivalently, for every \(N{\gt}0\),
Under the BNT projector-selection hypotheses, if every \(\mathcal K_x\) satisfies SAL, then \(M\) has the source GSNNCH form. Its outer sectors are the BNT sectors and its natural multiplicities are the copy numbers \(n_x\).
Let a BNT decomposition have a common nonzero weight within each sector, and suppose that its one-site words span the product of the virtual matrix algebras. For every sector \(s\), assume a physical-sector factorization with positive neighboring operators. If distinct absorbed representatives obey the unstarred layer identities, then there are pairwise orthogonal projections \(P_s\) such that
for every \(s,\beta ,\alpha \).
Let \({\cal K}\) be injective. Let \(R\) and \(\rho \) give a three-site closure of \({\cal K}\), choose a Hayashi decomposition of \(\rho \), and fix virtual indices \(\alpha _1,\beta _3\) such that \(R_{\beta _3,\alpha _1}\ne 0\). For the corresponding closed sector tensors, \(\mathcal T_{\cal K}=\sum _k |l_k)(r_k|\).
For every MPO tensor \(K\) and every chain length \(N\),
Every injective MPO tensor satisfying SAL admits an \(\eta \)-local structure. Thus there is a single positive two-site bond whose cyclic translates commute pairwise and whose ordered product is the finite-chain density operator at every length \(N\geq 2\), with normalization scalar one. This is the conclusion of Proposition C.8.
Let \(M\) be in normalized BNT-refined horizontal form, generate positive semidefinite ring operators, and satisfy the local renormalization fixed-point equations of Definition 4.1. Then \(M\) saturates the area law.
Let \(M\) be in normalized BNT-refined horizontal form, generate positive semidefinite ring operators, and satisfy the local renormalization fixed-point equations of Definition 4.1. Then \(\mathcal T_M^2=\mathcal T_M\) and \(M\) saturates the area law.
Let \(K\) be injective and satisfy SAL, and suppose that its doubled-index matrix-product tensor is normal. There is a positive physical-sector factorization whose selected two-site bond \(B\) has \(K\) itself as a normal fixed tensor representation. Its virtual dimension is the virtual dimension of \(K\), and for every \(N\geq 2\), \(\rho _N(K)=B_0B_1\cdots B_{N-1}\). In particular, the scalar is one. This is an existential statement about the bond selected in the proof of Proposition C.8; it does not assert uniqueness or normal rescalability for an arbitrary proportional commuting-bond presentation.
Let \(K_x\) be a nonempty finite family, let an orthogonally supported commuting sector family realize the tensors \(K_x\), and let \(n_x\) be positive natural numbers. Suppose that, for every \(N{\gt}0\),
If every \(K_x\) satisfies SAL, then \(M\) satisfies SAL.
Every injective MPO tensor satisfying SAL admits a physical-sector factorization such that, for every \(N\geq 1\) and every cyclic sector configuration \(k=(k_0,\ldots ,k_{N-1})\) with \(k_N=k_0\),
This is the projected-chain inequality in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, Lemma C.4, lines 1446–1450 ] . It does not assert positivity of the individual neighboring operators.
Every injective MPO tensor satisfying SAL admits a physical-sector factorization. This is only the raw algebraic factorization from Lemma C.4 and equations formK and etarl; coherent positivity of the neighboring operators, recurrence, and primitivity are not part of this conclusion.
Let \(\mathcal K\) be an injective normal matrix product density operator tensor satisfying the strong area law and literal zero correlation length,
Then there is a physical-sector factorization
with
positive semidefinite neighboring operators \(\eta _{k,h}\), and real families \((a_k)_k,(b_k)_k\) such that
and
The orientation of \(U\) is the physical-sector-factorization convention displayed above. No additional closure property of the sector tensors is asserted. This is the structural corollary at [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1503–1506 ] .
Let \({\cal K}\) be an injective MPDO, let \(R\) give a three-site closure, and fix an \(\eta \)-structure and a nonzero tail entry. Let \(N\geq 1\). For a cyclic sector assignment \(k_0,\ldots ,k_{N-1}\), suppose that every concrete operator \(\eta _{k_n,k_{n+1}}\) obtained from these data is nonzero. Then there are nonzero scalars \(c_n\) such that
This is the specialization of Theorem 20.15.4.35 to the inverse-map sector operators; positivity of the cyclic product follows from the MPDO property.
Let \(D\geq 1\), and let \(M\) generate diagonal positive semidefinite operators at every positive chain length. If \(L+R{\gt}0\) and the trace at length \(L+R\) is positive, then the classical mutual information of its normalized diagonal coefficients satisfies \(I(X:Y)\leq 2\log D\).
For a block of \(L\) spin–ancilla pairs, regroup
and trace the ancillary factor. Denote this map by \(\operatorname{Tr}_{\mathrm{anc},L}\). It is the blockwise analog of the one-site ancillary trace in Definition 20.6.3.
For a fixed system size \(N\), a block length \(L\le N\), and an MPO tensor \(M\) such that \(\rho ^{(N)}(M)\) is positive semidefinite, let
denote the normalized state and the reduced state of the first \(L\) of \(N\) spins. The \(L\)-block entropy is \(S_L^{(N)}(M)=S(\rho _L^{(N)}(M))\).
Given a tensor \(A\) and a blocking length \(L\), the \(L\)-blocked tensor is the tensor with physical index set \(\{ 0,\ldots ,d{-}1\} ^L\) (hence physical dimension \(d^L\)) and the same bond dimension \(D\), whose matrices are indexed by words \((i_1, \ldots , i_L) \in \{ 0,\ldots ,d{-}1\} ^L\):
Blocking coarse-grains \(L\) neighbouring sites into one tensor: the inner virtual bonds are contracted, the \(L\) physical legs merge into a single composite index, and the two outer bonds remain as the bond of \(A^{[L]}\).
For a fixed blocked length \(m\), the fixed-length form of the block-injective canonical-form condition is
Equivalently,
This is the fixed-length form of the block-injective canonical-form condition of [ CPGSV21 , lines 2113–2117 ] .
The coefficient form of a basis of normal tensors: each block \(A_j\) is a CPSV normal tensor (Definition 8.6.1), the MPV of \(A\) is given at every positive length by explicit coefficients \(c_j^{(N)} \in \mathbb {C}\) with \(|V^{(N)}(A)\rangle = \sum _{j=1}^{g} c_j^{(N)} |V^{(N)}(A_j)\rangle \), and the block MPVs \(\{ |V^{(N)}(A_j)\rangle \} \) are eventually linearly independent. This is the literal coefficient-form definition of [ CPGSV16 , Section 2.3 ] . It differs from Definition 9.1.1 only in the chosen normality predicate. Theorem 9.2.5 proves the implication between the two forms.
A BNT sector presentation of a tensor \(A\) is a nonempty sector decomposition \(P\) such that every representative has a positive number of copies, every copy has nonzero weight, every representative \(C_j\) is normal, the representative matrix product vectors are eventually linearly independent, and, for every \(N{\gt}0\),
This records the nonzero canonical summands constructed at [ CPGSV16 , lines 217–246 ] : repeated copies and their weights remain explicit.
Let \(A\) have bond dimension \(D\). It is in the canonical form of [ CPGSV16 , Section 2.3 ] if there are positive integers \(D_1,\ldots ,D_r\), normal tensors \(A_k\) of bond dimension \(D_k\), nonzero weights \(\mu _k\in \mathbb {C}\), and, writing \(S=\sum _kD_k\), a matrix \(U\in \mathbb {C}^{S\times D}\) such that \(S\le D\) and, for every physical index \(i\),
Thus the complement of the retained direct sum consists literally of zero bond-space coordinates. In particular, \(r=0\) is possible only when \(A=0\).
The convention in line 246 of [ CPGSV16 ] is a separate normalization of these data, not part of canonical-form membership:
Every weight \(\mu _k\) is nonzero. This is the reading of [ CPGSV16 , Section 2.3 ] adopted here: the remark in line 219 there places the degenerate case in the block dimensions (\(D_k=0\)), and lines 224–225 choose each \(\mu _k\) so that the transfer map of \(\mu _kA_k\) has spectral radius one, which a vanishing weight cannot satisfy. The reading loses nothing, since if \(\mu _{k_0}=0\) then \(\mu _{k_0}A_{k_0}^i=0\) is the zero matrix of size \(D_{k_0}\) and
so \(A^i\) is the same coisometric image of the direct sum over the remaining indices, with the \(D_{k_0}\) coordinates of the omitted summand moved to the zero complement. No ordering or separation condition is imposed.
The basis-of-normal-tensors refinement is Definition 9.1.1; it is not part of canonical form itself.
Identify the local four-dimensional spin with two qubits and write \(U=\sigma _x\otimes \sigma _x\). Starting from one Bell pair on every bond, apply independently at each site the channel
Equivalently, use the local purification with Kraus amplitudes \(\sqrt3/2\) for the identity and \(1/2\) for the correlated flip. This is distinct from the repeated-left expression printed in the source.
Place one maximally entangled qubit pair on each bond of the four-spin ring and apply, independently at every spin, the corrected correlated flip with flip probability one quarter. A joint flip configuration \(s\in \{ 0,1\} ^4\) has probability
and its bond pattern \(t\in \{ 0,1\} ^4\) is \(t_n=s_n\oplus s_{n+1}\), with spin five identified with spin one. Write \(q\) for the pushforward of \(P\) to bond patterns. The weight family of a window of \(k\) consecutive spins, \(1\le k\le 3\), assigns to each configuration of its \(k-1\) interior bond labels and its two boundary qubits one quarter of the marginal probability of those interior labels; the four-spin window weight family is \(q\) itself.
- CPSVExample410CorrelatedFlip.flipWeight
- CPSVExample410CorrelatedFlip.flipProb
- CPSVExample410CorrelatedFlip.bondPattern
- CPSVExample410CorrelatedFlip.bondWeight
- CPSVExample410CorrelatedFlip.bondWeightValue
- CPSVExample410CorrelatedFlip.oneBondWeight
- CPSVExample410CorrelatedFlip.twoBondWeight
- CPSVExample410CorrelatedFlip.windowWeightOne
- CPSVExample410CorrelatedFlip.windowWeightTwo
- CPSVExample410CorrelatedFlip.windowWeightThree
Identify the ambient one-site basis with \(\{ |a,b\rangle :a,b\in \{ 0,1\} \} \). Define
Then \(\iota \) is injective and \(V^*V=I_2\). For a binary configuration \(\sigma \), write \(\iota \sigma \) for its sitewise image in the ambient basis.
The coefficient matrix extracted from the four diagonal neighboring operators printed in [ CPGSV16 , Example 4.11, lines 907–924 ] is
In the effective binary encoding, the supported label \(k\in \{ 0,1\} \) selects the ambient two-qubit basis vector \(|k,k\rangle \). Let \(M\) be the cyclic-edge tensor for the ket–bra diagonal edge coefficient induced by \(W\). For a positive cycle length \(N\), define
This is a physical-dimension-\(2\) support model. The ambient physical-dimension-\(4\) realization is obtained by the support inclusion defined below; the two physical spaces are not identified by an equivalence.
For a binary configuration \(\boldsymbol \sigma =(\sigma _0,\ldots ,\sigma _{N-1})\), define
This is the diagonal entry of \(\sigma _z^{\otimes N}\) at \(\boldsymbol \sigma \).
For the state in [ CPGSV16 , Example 4.12, lines 932–938 ] , at \(N=4\) regard the sites as \(A=\{ 0\} \), \(B=\{ 1,3\} \), and \(C=\{ 2\} \). Encode the two binary labels \((b_1,b_3)\) as one four-dimensional label \(b\), and write \(z_a\in \{ 1,-1\} \) for the eigenvalue of \(\sigma _z\) at \(a\). In the basis \((a,b,c)\leftrightarrow (a,b_1,c,b_3)\), let \(\rho _{ABC}\) be the normalized four-site state and set
Let \(M\) be the tensor with \(d=D=2\) whose only nonzero components are
and let \(\sigma _z=|0\rangle \langle 0|-|1\rangle \langle 1|\).
For \(n\in \mathbb {N}\) and \(\alpha ,\beta \in \{ 0,1\} \), define
These are the transition counts governed by the recurrence in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix D, lines 2131–2149 ] .
For \(n{\gt}0\) and \(\alpha ,\beta \in \{ 0,1\} \), define the matrix \(\rho ^{(n)}_{\alpha \beta }(A)\), indexed by physical words \(\sigma \) and \(\tau \), by
This is the concrete tensor in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix D, lines 2116–2121 ] . Its physical labels are triples \(i,j,k\in \{ 0,1\} \) and its virtual labels are \(\alpha ,\beta \in \{ 0,1\} \). The fusion weights satisfy
Every weight outside this zero set is positive, and
The canonical support tensor takes every nonzero \(N_{ijk}\) to be one.
Two tensors \(A\) and \(B\) are eventually nonzero proportional if, for all sufficiently large \(N\), there is a nonzero scalar \(c_N \in \mathbb {C}\) such that \(|V^{(N)}(A)\rangle = c_N |V^{(N)}(B)\rangle \). This auxiliary form is used with the eventual linear-independence statement Lemma E.1.10.
For square matrices \(A_n\) indexed by \(n=0,\ldots ,N-1\), possibly with different index types, their finite Kronecker product is the matrix with entries
Let \(R_1\) identify an \((N+1)\)-tuple with its first coordinate and the remaining \(N\)-tuple. Let \(R_2\) identify an \((N+2)\)-tuple with its first two coordinates and the remaining \(N\)-tuple.
Two tensors \(A\) and \(B\) of the same bond dimension \(D\) are gauge equivalent if there exists an invertible matrix \(X \in \mathrm{GL}_D(\mathbb {C})\) such that, for every \(i \in \{ 0,\ldots ,d{-}1\} \),
In tensor-network notation, (5) is represented by
where the black node denotes the tensor \(A\), the upper leg is the physical index \(i\), and the two red side nodes denote the gauge matrices acting on the virtual legs.
Two tensors \(A\) and \(B\) are gauge-phase equivalent if there exist \(X \in \mathrm{GL}_D(\mathbb {C})\) and \(\zeta \in \mathbb {C}\setminus \{ 0\} \) such that, for every physical index \(i\),
Given per-block gauges \(X_k \in \mathrm{GL}_{D_k}(\mathbb {C})\), form the block-diagonal element \(\bigoplus _k X_k\) and then reindex the dependent block-coordinate space with the standard bond index \(\{ 0,\ldots ,\sum _k D_k-1\} \) of the assembled tensor. The result is an element of \(\mathrm{GL}_{\sum _k D_k}(\mathbb {C})\).
An MPO tensor is in normalized BNT-refined horizontal form if its doubled-index MPS tensor is a BNT sector decomposition with an independent gauge on every repeated copy:
Here the \(A_j\) are the distinct minimal representatives, \(r_j{\gt}0\), and every weight \(\mu _{j,q}\) is nonzero, \(|\mu _{j,q}|\leq 1\), and at least one weight has modulus one. The BNT hypotheses include irreducibility, left-canonicality, normalized self-overlap, eventual linear independence of the representative MPV families, and the exclusion of similarity up to phase between distinct representatives. Repeated gauge-equivalent copies are retained over the same representative rather than separated as distinct blocks. The total bond dimension of the displayed direct sum is exactly \(D\). Equivalently, with the block-diagonal matrix \(X=\bigoplus _{j,q}X_{j,q}\),
This is a strengthened representative-grouped form of the canonical decomposition in [ CPGSV16 , Section 2.3 ] . In contrast with Definition 8.6.7, the retained direct sum has the full bond dimension, every copy weight is nonzero and normalized, and gauge-equivalent normal blocks are grouped over a BNT representative with a separate gauge for each copy. It is therefore not the literal CPSV canonical-form hypothesis.
An MPO tensor \(M\) satisfies the local purification RFP condition if it is an LPDO whose purifying tensor \(A\), viewed as a matrix product state tensor on the combined spin–ancilla index, is a pure-state renormalization fixed point. Thus
This local condition is motivated by the purification tensor formula [ CPGSV16 , lines 744–747 ] , but it is a one-site tensor-level condition rather than the global finite-chain definition in Definition 20.6.5.
An MPO tensor is a nondegenerate purification renormalization fixed point if it is the local ancillary contraction of a pure-state renormalization fixed point and \(\mathcal T_M=\sum _i M^{ii}\ne 0\). The nonzero condition records the nondegeneracy implicit in the density operators of [ CPGSV16 , lines 744–786 ] and excludes the zero purifying tensor.
An MPO tensor \(M\) is a renormalization fixed point if there exist two trace-preserving completely positive maps \(\mathcal{S}, \mathcal{T}\) on the physical indices such that \(\mathcal{S}[M_2(X)]=M_1(X)\) and \(\mathcal{T}[M_1(X)]=M_2(X)\) for every virtual operator \(X\), where \(M_1(X)_{ij}=\operatorname{tr}(M^{ij}X)\) and \(M_2(X)_{(i_1i_2)(j_1j_2)} =\operatorname{tr}(M^{i_1j_1}M^{i_2j_2}X)\) are the one- and two-site physical operators obtained by closing one or two tensors with \(X\). This condition is distinct from idempotence of the doubled-index transfer map for general mixed states. Its source zero-correlation-length consequence concerns the physical-trace transfer and is proved below. In [ CPGSV16 , Definition 4.1, lines 638–660 ] , this local condition is imposed on a tensor already in canonical form and generating matrix product density operators. The definition above isolates the two channel equations; results that use the source’s standing hypotheses state them separately. On the open coefficient tensors the two maps have types:
An MPO tensor \(M\) that generates an MPDO and whose positive-length finite-chain operators \(\rho ^{(N)}(M)\) all have nonzero trace (so the normalized states are well-defined) saturates the area law if \(I_L=I_{L+1}\) for all \(1\le L{\lt}\lfloor N/2\rfloor \) and all \(N\); that is, the mutual information is constant, \(I_1=I_2=\cdots =I_{\lfloor N/2\rfloor }\). This is [ CPGSV16 , Definition 4.6, line 811 ] .
An MPO tensor is an LPDO if there exist a Kraus dimension \(d_K\), an inner bond dimension \(D'\), a bond-space identification \(e:\{ 0,\ldots ,D-1\} \simeq \{ 0,\ldots ,D'-1\} \times \{ 0,\ldots ,D'-1\} \) (equivalently, \(D\) and \((D')^2\) have the same cardinality), and matrices \(A^{(i,k)}\in M_{D'}(\mathbb {C})\) such that, for all physical indices \(i,j\),
where \(\otimes \) denotes the Kronecker product, \(\overline{(\cdot )}\) denotes entrywise complex conjugation, and \((\cdot )_{e,e}\) denotes reindexing along \(e\) back to \(\{ 0,\ldots ,D-1\} \). See [ CPGSV16 , Section 4.3 ] . The local contraction is
The auxiliary predicates state two matrix-theoretic ingredients used in the rank-one step of [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, Lemma C.5 ] : constant traces of all positive powers and existence of a rank-one factorization \(T=ab^\top \).
The proposed implication from primitivity and constant trace powers to a rank-one factorization is not a valid general theorem. A concrete \(3\times 3\) counterexample appears in the archive. The corrected criterion proved here adds positive semidefiniteness and trace normalization, which provide the diagonalizability needed to turn the trace-power condition into a rank-one factorization.
For sector weights \(p_k\), let \(I_*=\{ k:p_k\ne 0\} \). The one-site matrices and their spaces on \(I_*\) are
The real trace matrix on this index set is
Only the trace matrix is restricted: the physical direct sum still contains every zero-weight summand.
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.ActiveSector
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.ActiveSectorEntryIndex
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.activeSectorOneSiteMatrixFamily
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.activeSectorSet
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.activeSectorOneSiteSpace
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.activeSectorTraceMatrix
For a matrix \(X\) on the spin–ancilla space, the ancillary trace map is
This is the one-site trace over ancillary degrees of freedom appearing in [ CPGSV16 , lines 751 and 761–764 ] .
Let \(M_c^{il}\in M_{D_c}(\mathbb {C})\) be a finite labelled MPO tensor family. A simultaneous block left inverse consists of coefficients \(C_{(c,x,y),(i,l)}\) such that
This is the common block inverse used in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1666–1676 ] and [ BMW\(^{+}\)17 , lines 269–277 ] .
Suppose that every entry of the one-site multiplicity matrices, every entry of the two-site multiplicity matrices, and every entry of the matrices \(\chi _{\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma }\) is positive. Suppose also that \(\sum _i\mu _{\alpha ,i}=m_\alpha \) for every \(\alpha \). If, for every \(\gamma \) and all sufficiently large \(L\),
then the entries on the two sides agree as multisets. Together with the one-site trace identity \(\sum _i\mu _{\alpha ,i}=m_\alpha \), the one-site and two-site multiplicity entries and their dimensions define a BNT multiplicity-spectrum comparison.
Positivity makes all entries nonzero. Eventual equality of two finite sums of geometric sequences gives, for every \(L\geq 1\),
The finite power-sum identity determines both the cardinality and the multiset of entries.
An active-support fusion coisometry family consists of the same labelled tensors and positive diagonal matrices, together with maps \(U_{\alpha ,\beta }\) satisfying \(U_{\alpha ,\beta }U_{\alpha ,\beta }^\dagger =1\), the forward fusion identity
and exact reconstruction
Zero-dimensional retained sums are permitted. If in addition \(U_{\alpha ,\beta }^\dagger U_{\alpha ,\beta }=1\) for every pair, this family gives the preceding full-support fusion-isometry family.
Local fix (Figure-11 fusion coisometry): The source uses the retained-row orientation of Proposition 4.13. Thus its fusion maps are coisometries onto the active sectors; exact reconstruction records the discarded common zero corner. This convention is documented in [ con26j ] .
A BNT-label trace-scalar family and a BNT-label coefficient system have idempotent coefficient form when, for every BNT label \(\gamma \),
This is the idempotent condition in [ CPGSV16 , Theorem 4.14(ii) ] , stated separately from the trace-power formula.
For a family \(\{ \mathcal K_x\} _{x=0}^{g-1}\), write \(\mathcal K_x[\beta ,\alpha ]\in M_d(\mathbb {C})\) for the physical matrix obtained by fixing the two virtual indices. The layers are orthogonal when, for \(x\ne y\),
for every choice of virtual indices. Equivalently, for all physical indices \(i,j\),
The factor order is exactly \(\mathcal K_y\mathcal K_x\); no adjoint occurs. This is equation AppKxKy=0 in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1634–1639 ] .
For a normal sector \(s\) and a Markov sector \(k\), let
The assertion \(O_s^{(k)}\ne 0\) means that this block is nonzero for at least one pair of virtual indices \(\beta ,\alpha \).
Let \(C_x\) and \(C_y\) be two rows of a simultaneous left inverse, and choose a Hayashi decomposition of the three-site operator. In its \(k\)-th Markov sector, set
These are the two factors obtained in the projected contraction of [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1719–1725 ] .
Under the hypotheses of Theorem 20.15.2.10, define
This is equation Pis, restricted to the positive-weight Markov support retained here.
For sector tensors \((l_k)_\beta \) and \((r_k)_\alpha \), close their physical legs and set
This is the pairing operator displayed in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1473–1493 ] .
Tracing the two physical legs of a sector tensor leaves a vector over the virtual bond:
These are the closed tensors of [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1473–1477 ] .
Suppose the weights over each representative do not depend on the copy index. Choose the common weight \(\mu _j\) from any copy over \(j\) and absorb it into the representative:
This is the convention of [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, equation CFK, lines 1660–1665 ] .
Fix a BNT label \(s_0\). Each positive-weight Markov sector retains its unique BNT label, while every zero-weight Markov sector is assigned the label \(s_0\). If \(\widehat S_s\) is the set of Markov sectors with completed label \(s\), define
Let \(H=\bigoplus _{k,h}H_{k,h}\). Orthogonally controlling the completed preparations over the sector pairs gives a map
where \((A_{k,h,a})_a\) is a Kraus family for \(\overline{\mathcal S}_{k,h}\) and the tilde denotes its extension by zero outside \(H_{k,h}\). Thus the map discards inter-sector coherences and applies the completed preparation in each diagonal sector. On active sectors this is the sector-control formula for \(\mathcal S_1\) in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1548–1555 ] .
For every sector pair define
On an active pair this is precisely the preparation \(\mathcal S_{k,h}\) of [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1551–1555 ] ; the second branch gives a normalized extension on a pair where the displayed source quotient is undefined.
Orthogonally controlling the completed direct-sum preparations gives
where \((B_{k,h,a})_a\) is a Kraus family for \(\overline{\mathcal T}_{k,h}\). This map discards inter-sector coherences and, on active sectors, is the sector-control formula for \(\mathcal T_1\) in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1523–1535 ] .
For every sector pair define
Thus \(\mathcal H^{\Omega }_{k,h}\) is the carrier space, whereas \(\Omega _{k,h}\), \(\widehat\Omega _{k,h}\), and \(\overline\Omega _{k,h}\) are operators on it: respectively the unnormalized neighboring operator, its normalization on an active pair, and its completed density on an arbitrary pair. On an active pair this is precisely the preparation \(\mathcal T_{k,h}\) of [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1527–1535 ] ; the inactive branch is a normalized extension.
Let \(U\) be a matrix on the physical space. The physical conjugation of \({\cal K}\) by \(U\) is the tensor \(\widetilde{\cal K}\) defined by
Its horizontal bond indices are unchanged. When \(U\) is unitary, this is the corresponding physical basis change.
For a physical-sector factorization with neighboring operators \(\eta _{k,h}\), retain a sector \(k\) when there is a sector \(h\) such that \(\eta _{k,h}\ne 0\) and \(h\leadsto k\), where \(\leadsto \) denotes reachability by nonzero neighboring operators. The first edge \(k\to h\) is explicit, so the resulting closed walk has positive length even when the return path is empty. The set \(C\) of retained sectors is therefore exactly the set of vertices occurring in positive-length directed cycles, in the sense of [ Bei12 , Section III ] . Define, for \(k,h\in C\),
For positive semidefinite neighboring operators the trace is real, so \(T_{k,h}=\operatorname{tr}(\eta _{k,h})\), and \(T_{k,h}{\gt}0\) is equivalent to \(\eta _{k,h}\ne 0\).
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.IsCyclicActiveSector
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.cyclicActiveWeight
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.cyclicActiveWeight_ne_zero_iff
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.CyclicActiveSector
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.cyclicActiveSectorTraceMatrix
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.neighboringOperator_trace_re_pos_iff
A scalar weight \(w(i,j;i',j')\) on two consecutive ket–bra pairs determines a translation-invariant matrix-product tensor with virtual dimension \(d^2\). Its incoming virtual pair is constrained to equal the current physical ket–bra pair, while its outgoing pair records the following physical pair.
Let \(N\geq 1\) and let \(k\) be a sector configuration. Define the matrix \(\Omega _k\) on \(I_k\) by
Thus \(\Omega _k=\eta _{k_0,k_1}\otimes \cdots \otimes \eta _{k_{N-1},k_0}\) after the neighboring tensor factors are ordered cyclically.
For a doubled-index tensor \(B\) with physical dimension \(d^{2}\), the physical-trace transfer is the bond matrix obtained by closing the ket leg against the bra leg of one tensor:
This is the transfer object of the zero-correlation-length condition of [ CPGSV16 , Definition 4.2, lines 735–739 ] , applied to one element of a basis of normal tensors.
Let \(V:\mathbb {C}^d\to \mathbb {C}^e\) be a linear map. Its action on the doubled ket–bra index is the matrix \(W:\mathbb {C}^{d^2}\to \mathbb {C}^{e^2}\) with
For a cyclic sector assignment \((k_n)_{n\in \mathbb Z/N\mathbb Z}\), the horizontal bond fiber at \(n\) is
Shifting the left component by one site identifies \(\prod _n H_n\) with the vertex-indexed sector fiber used in the cyclic neighboring-operator product.
This defines the one-bond eta-local form constructed in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2 ] : a two-site bond \(B\) as in Definition 20.16.1 together with, for every chain length \(N\ge 2\), a constant \(c{\gt}0\) such that
The bond acts on the full two-site space.
Every Hayashi decomposition witness \(h_\eta \) canonically produces an explicit neighboring \(\eta \)-family by Kronecker-multiplying the sector-reduced states on the neighboring bond spaces:
Positive semidefiniteness of each \(\eta _{k,h}\) follows from the fact that partial traces preserve positivity and that positive semidefiniteness is closed under Kronecker products. This is the sector-reduced extraction; the remaining connection to [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2 ] is the identification of this family with the inverse-map construction in the original simple-MPDO tensor coordinates.
Let \((l_k)_a\) and \((r_k)_a\) be sector tensors indexed by the horizontal virtual index \(a\). For neighboring sectors \(k,h\), define an operator on \(B_k^R\otimes B_h^L\) by
Thus \(\eta _{k,h}=r_k l_h\) is the contraction over the shared horizontal index in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, equation (etarl) ] . Positivity is not part of this definition.
For sectors \(k,h\), define the positive-operator candidate
The summand indexed by \(l\) acts on \((B_k^R\otimes B_l^L)\otimes (B_l^R\otimes B_h^L)\). This is the operator adjoined by \(\mathcal T_{k,h}\) in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1527–1535 ] .
Let \((\eta _{k,h})\) be a positive neighboring-operator family. A rank-one trace factorization consists of real families \((a_k)\) and \((b_h)\) such that
These identities occur in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1395–1402 ] .
The nonzero support graph of a neighboring-operator family has a directed edge \(k\to h\) precisely when \(\eta _{k,h}\ne 0\). Its support is recurrent when every such edge belongs to a directed cycle, equivalently when \(h\) can reach \(k\) whenever \(k\to h\) is an edge.
For a three-site density operator \(\rho _{ABC}\), the local \(\eta \)-structure is the quantum Markov decomposition on the middle subsystem \(B\) produced by equality in strong subadditivity. Concretely, after a unitary change of basis on \(B\), one has a finite direct-sum decomposition
If every neighboring operator \(\eta _{k,h}\) of Definition 20.15.3.1 is positive semidefinite, the family constitutes explicit neighboring \(\eta \)-data. The source obtains the positivity from the projected chain identity: writing \(\tilde\sigma = U^{\dagger \otimes N} \sigma ^{(N)}({\cal K})\, U^{\otimes N}\) for the \(N\)-site operator in the sector basis and \(Q_k\) for the projector onto the \(k\)-th sector of the physical splitting, every cyclic sector assignment \(k_1,\ldots ,k_N\) (with \(k_{N+1}=k_1\)) satisfies
and the sector tensors can be chosen so that each factor is positive semidefinite [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1446–1450 ] . The all-length sector identity is Theorem 20.15.4.18. That algebraic identity does not by itself choose coherent positive representatives for all neighboring pairs, so positive semidefiniteness remains a hypothesis on the chosen representatives here. Theorem 20.15.4.39 provides the diagonal and paired positivity, and Theorem 20.15.4.42 a rescaled positive family under symmetric support.
Fix a Hayashi decomposition witness \(h_\eta \). An explicit neighboring \(\eta \)-family is a dependent family \((\eta _{k,h})\) indexed by sector pairs, where \(\eta _{k,h}\) acts on the neighboring bond space \(B_k^{R} \otimes B_h^{L}\). Requiring positivity for each pair gives the corresponding positive \(\eta \)-data.
Every explicit neighboring \(\eta \)-family determines a sector-by-sector trace matrix. We give both its complex-valued form and the real-part version, which is the direct data for the real Perron–Frobenius matrix \(T\) used in the rank-one step.
For fixed sectors \((k,h)\), define the fiberwise form of \(\mathcal T_0\) by regrouping two sites and tracing \(R_k\otimes L_h\). For fixed \((k,l,h)\), define the fiberwise form of \(\mathcal S_0\) by regrouping three sites and tracing \((R_k\otimes L_l)\otimes (R_l\otimes L_h)\).
On fixed sector pairs, define \(\mathcal S_2\) and \(\mathcal T_2\) by the same inverse regroupings as the corresponding global shifts.
After \(R_1\) separates the first physical coordinate from the \(N\) spectator coordinates, define
where \(i,p\in \{ 0,\ldots ,d-1\} \) and \(u\in \{ 0,\ldots ,d-1\} ^N\). Thus, for a matrix \(Z\) indexed by \(((i,u),p)\),
A fixed tensor for a bond-product family consists of a positive virtual dimension and one matrix-product tensor \(C\), independent of \(N\), such that, for every \(N\ge 2\),
If \(d{\gt}0\), a cyclic scalar edge-weight expression for the entries of the product gives such a tensor with positive virtual dimension \(d^2\).
For a virtual matrix \(X\), the four-site physical closure of \(K\) is the operator \(K_4(X)\) whose matrix coefficients are
A rank-one trace factorization of neighboring matrices \(\eta _{q,h}\) consists of real numbers \(a_q,b_h\) such that
The factorization is an explicit assumption; it is not deduced from zero correlation length. It is the factorization invoked at [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, line 1613 ] .
An MPO tensor \(M\) satisfies the global purification equation with a purifying tensor \(A\) if \(\rho ^{(N)}(M)=\rho ^{(N)}_p(A)\) for every positive length \(N\). Equivalently, for every positive length \(N\),
as in [ CPGSV16 , line 751 ] .
Let \(N\) count the sites that are left unchanged. For physical maps \(\mathcal T:M_d\to M_{d^2}\) and \(\mathcal S:M_{d^2}\to M_d\), define
using \(R_1\) and \(R_2\). Thus \(N=0\) leaves no spectator site, but the maps still act on a one-site or two-site operator; no empty ring occurs.
The two- and three-site physical spaces are reindexed by their canonical direct sums over sector pairs and triples, with each summand further regrouped into its boundary and neighboring factors. Write \(\mathfrak G_2\) and \(\mathfrak G_3\) for these reindexings of matrices.
This condition asks, for every chain length \(N\geq 2\), for one positive bond on the full two-site space and one positive normalization such that
This auxiliary condition contains no explicit sector labels or multiplicities.
An MPO tensor \(M\) has the single-bond commuting-form property if for every \(N \ge 2\) there is a two-site operator \(B\) as in Definition 20.13.2 and a constant \(c{\gt}0\) such that
The bond in this chainwise condition may depend on \(N\). It is therefore weaker than the single translation-invariant bond family used in the proposition at [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1597–1619 ] .
The spin reduction obtained by tracing the ancillary index is trace-preserving completely positive: the ancillary trace map \(\operatorname{tr}_a\) satisfies the corresponding definition in the companion quantum-channel volume [ LTC26 , “Trace-preserving completely positive map” ] . This is the structure described immediately after Definition 4.3 in [ CPGSV16 , lines 761–764 ] .
Fix virtual indices \(\beta ,\alpha \) and set \(\kappa _{\beta ,\alpha }(i,j)=\mathcal K^{ij}_{\beta ,\alpha }\). For a Hayashi sector \(k\), define the two inverse factors
These are the two factors in the sectorwise inverse-map calculation of [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1407–1428 ] .
Let \(B=\bigoplus _k(b_1^{(k)}\otimes b_2^{(k)})\) be the middle-site decomposition, and let \(E_k\) be the coordinate projection onto its \(k\)-th summand. In the original physical basis, define \(Q_k=U_B^*E_kU_B\). These are the projectors introduced in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1364–1368 ] ; the unitary implements the basis change described in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1437–1440 ] .
A simple MPO tensor \(K\) is called injective if its doubled-index MPS tensor is injective. For such a tensor, the chosen decomposition map of the doubled-index MPS furnishes a concrete inverse tensor \(K^{-1}\) together with right- and left-physical realization maps that turn virtual bond insertions back into local physical operators.
Let \(\mathcal{K}\) be injective, let \(\rho \) be its three-site closure against a virtual tail \(R\), and choose a Hayashi decomposition of \(\rho \). Fix outer indices such that \(R_{\beta _3,\alpha _1}\ne 0\). The inverse-map tensors \(l_k,r_k\), together with the Hayashi physical decomposition and unitary, determine a physical-sector factorization of \(\mathcal{K}\).
The left and right factor spaces are nonzero because the corresponding Hayashi density matrices have trace one; their nonzero dimensions are conclusions rather than hypotheses. No positivity of the neighboring operators is asserted. This gives the factorization in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, equations AppUkU=rl and formK, lines 1383–1387 and 1434–1439 ] .
Let \(\mathcal K\) be an injective simple MPO tensor, and let \(R\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be the virtual contraction of the sites following a three-site word. For virtual indices \(\alpha _1,\beta _1,\alpha _3,\beta _3\), define
This is the contraction used in the proof of [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1415–1438 ] .
An MPO tensor satisfies the bare global purification RFP predicate if it has a positive-length global purification RFP witness. Equivalently, it admits a purifying tensor \(A\) such that, for every positive length \(N\),
and \(\widehat A\) is a pure-state renormalization fixed point. These are the displayed conditions of Definition 4.3 in [ CPGSV16 , lines 756–764 ] ; the nondegenerate tensor-level predicate is Definition 20.6.13.
Reassociating four right-associated sites as \((123)4\), applying \(\widehat{\mathcal S}\otimes \operatorname{id}\) to the first three, and reassociating the result back to \(1(23)\) defines the localized coarse-graining channel \(\widehat{\mathcal S}_{(123)4}:M_{q^4}(\mathbb {C})\longrightarrow M_{q^3}(\mathbb {C})\) on right-associated physical coordinates.
Reassociating three right-associated sites as \((12)3\), applying \(\widehat{\mathcal T}\otimes \operatorname{id}\) to the first two, and reassociating the result back to \(1(2(34))\) defines the localized refinement channel \(\widehat{\mathcal T}_{(12)3}:M_{q^3}(\mathbb {C})\longrightarrow M_{q^4}(\mathbb {C})\) on right-associated physical coordinates.
For a virtual matrix \(P\), define
The ordinary neighboring contraction is the case \(P=I\).
For sectors \(k,h\), contract the common virtual index of the right and left sector tensors:
This is an operator on \(B_k^R\otimes B_h^L\). Positivity is not part of this definition; it is a separate hypothesis in Proposition C.7.
Suppose that every neighboring operator is positive semidefinite and that there are real numbers \(a_k,b_h\) such that
These are precisely the remaining hypotheses used in the construction of Proposition C.7 after the physical-sector factorization has been fixed [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1389–1403 ] .
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.weight_nonneg
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.neighboringOperator_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.neighborIndex_nonempty_of_mul_ne_zero
With the convention \(0^{-1}=0\), define for every pair \((k,h)\)
These operators are normalized when the pair is active, namely when \(a_kb_h\ne 0\).
Let \(\mathcal K\) be an MPO tensor and set \(Z_4=\operatorname{tr}[\rho ^{(4)}(\mathcal K)]\). Its normalized fourth-site virtual tail is
Thus the contraction of the fourth ket and bra indices is incorporated into the virtual closing matrix. This is the \(N=4\) specialization of the normalization convention and three-site marginal in [ CPGSV16 , lines 792–793 and 1343–1348 ] .
Let the vertical sectors be labelled by \(\alpha \), with simple matrix algebra \(M_{d_\alpha }\) and positive diagonal multiplicity matrix
Write \(m_\alpha =\operatorname{tr}(\mu _\alpha )\). The normalized embedding and the left partial trace are
On a weighted sector, \(\widetilde R_\mu (\lambda _\alpha \mu _\alpha \otimes X_\alpha ) =\lambda _\alpha m_\alpha X_\alpha \). Thus the partial trace is the canonical extension to the full block matrix space of the inverse map displayed in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.4, lines 1957–1971 ] .
For a sector \(k\) and physical matrix indices \(x,y\) in its summand, let \(A_{k;x,y}\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be the corresponding entry of the sector-coordinate tensor. For a set \(S\) of sectors, define
These are the matrix spaces associated with the physical projections in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1463–1467 ] .
The product tensor of two MPO tensors contracts the bra index of the first factor with the ket index of the second and takes the tensor product of the bond spaces:
In the vertical reading of [ CPGSV16 , Section 4.5 ] this is the tensor obtained by joining two vertically read tensors along the original horizontal bond, the tensor written \(M_\alpha M_\beta \) in [ CPGSV16 , Theorem 4.14(iii) ] .
An original-label corner family for the retained product records, for every active corner of each copy pair, an original one-site BNT label, a positive coefficient, and an isometric inclusion into the raw product bond space. Distinct corners belonging to one copy pair have orthogonal ranges. Each inclusion intertwines the raw product tensor with the stated positive multiple of its original BNT representative, and the resulting corners reconstruct every tensor letter exactly.
Local fix (Figure-11 fixed-pair support): A copy pair with no active corner is represented by an empty family; no unsupported corner is inserted. See [ con26q ] .
Let \(\{ K_x\} _{x=0}^{g-1}\) be MPO tensors on a common one-site space. An orthogonally supported family of commuting sector products consists of pairwise orthogonal one-site projections \(P_x\) and positive two-site operators \(B^{(x)}\) such that
and, for every \(N\geq 2\),
Together with natural multiplicities \(n_x\), these objects determine the corresponding finite-chain sector decomposition in Definition 20.13.1.
For an MPO tensor \(K\), define \(K^\sharp \) by
Thus \(K^\sharp [\beta ,\alpha ]=K[\beta ,\alpha ]^*\), while the virtual indices retain their order. For every periodic chain,
For an integer \(L\geq 0\), group \(L\) adjacent physical sites and denote the resulting local tensor by \(M^{[L]}\). It has a length-\(L\) ket word \(I=(i_1,\ldots ,i_L)\) and a length-\(L\) bra word \(J=(j_1,\ldots ,j_L)\) as its physical indices, and
Thus the ket and bra words are grouped separately. For \(L=0\), both words are empty and the unique local matrix is the identity. For \(L{\gt}0\), this is the MPO version of the physical blocking used for the basis of normal tensors in [ CPGSV16 , lines 317–345 ] . It is a local tensor, not the closed-chain operator \(O_L(M)\) of [ CPGSV16 , lines 962–967 ] .
Define
Here the first application acts on the first three sites and leaves the fourth site unchanged. The superscript again denotes successive overlapping applications.
Let \(N\geq 1\). For a cyclic sector configuration \(k=(k_0,\ldots ,k_{N-1})\), write
Applying the one-site sector decomposition at every site gives a bijection
On \(I_k\), define the cyclic neighboring product by
where site labels are read modulo \(N\).
The coordinate equivalences used by the coarse-graining channel expose the direct sums over site-sector pairs and triples. Write \(\mathfrak R_2\) and \(\mathfrak R_3\) for the corresponding matrix reindexings. Their inverses send every sector block to the corresponding physical matrix entries. These reindexings preserve the left-right order within every physical site. They differ from the regrouped coordinates \(\mathfrak G_2\) and \(\mathfrak G_3\) of Definition 20.15.3.39, which place the two outer subspins before the neighboring subspins. If \(R_{\Phi _2}\) and \(R_{\Phi _3}\) denote the two regrouping maps, then
A physical-sector factorization of an MPO tensor \(\mathcal{K}\) consists of a finite decomposition
whose left and right factors are nonzero, an isometry \(U\) on the physical space, and matrix families \((l_k)_\beta \) and \((r_k)_\alpha \) such that every physical slice satisfies
No positivity, trace factorization, or quantum-Markov decomposition is included in this datum. This is the factorization displayed in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1381–1388 ] .
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.transformedPhysicalSlice
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.transformedPhysicalSlice_eq
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.sectorFinEquiv
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.sectorCoordinateTensor
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.neighborIndex_nonempty
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.sectorCoordinateTensor_apply
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.sectorCoordinateTensor_apply_same
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.sectorCoordinateTensor_apply_ne
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.transformedPhysicalSlice_apply_same
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.transformedPhysicalSlice_apply_ne
Let \(K\) and \(L\) have virtual dimensions \(D\) and \(E\), respectively, and suppose that a rectangular matrix \(V\in M_{D\times E}(\mathbb {C})\) satisfies the following identity for every physical index \(i\):
Every physical-sector factorization of \(K\) induces one of \(L\) with the same physical decomposition. This construction combines the virtual corner in [ CPGSV16 , Section 2.3, lines 195–219 ] with the physical-sector factorization in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1381–1439 ] .
Let \(K\) and \(L\) have virtual dimensions \(D\) and \(E\), respectively. Suppose that matrices \(X\in M_{E\times D}(\mathbb {C})\) and \(Y\in M_{D\times E}(\mathbb {C})\) satisfy the following identity for every physical index \(i\):
Every physical-sector factorization of \(K\) induces one of \(L\) with the same physical decomposition. Its virtual tensor families are
This construction abstracts the virtual corner in [ CPGSV16 , Section 2.3, lines 195–219 ] and the physical-sector factorization in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1381–1439 ] .
Let \(S\) be a set of active sectors in a physical-sector factorization, and suppose that \((l_k)_\beta =0\) for every \(k\notin S\) and every \(\beta \). Retain every physical summand and define
Then \(\widehat l_k\otimes \widehat r_k=l_k\otimes r_k\) for every \(k\), so the physical-slice factorization is unchanged. The neighboring operators become
This is the reparameterization freedom in the factorization and neighboring contraction of [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1434–1445 ] .
Let \(z_k\in \mathbb {C}\) satisfy \(|z_k|=1\) for every sector. Replacing
leaves every physical-slice factorization unchanged.
On a sector pair with \(a_kb_h\ne 0\), let \(\mathcal S_{k,h}(X)=X\otimes \frac{\eta _{k,h}}{a_kb_h}\). If \(a_kb_h=0\), positivity and vanishing trace imply \(\eta _{k,h}=0\); choose any density operator on that unused summand. Taking the orthogonal direct sum over \((k,h)\) defines \(\mathcal S_1\).
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.normalizedNeighboringDensity
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.normalizedNeighboringDensity_pos
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.trace_normalizedNeighboringDensity
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.normalizedNeighboringPreparationMap_isKrausCPTP
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.inactiveNeighboringDensity
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.inactiveNeighboringDensity_posDef
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.inactiveNeighboringDensity_trace
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.completedNeighboringDensity
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.completedNeighboringDensity_pos
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.trace_completedNeighboringDensity
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.completedNeighboringDensity_eq_normalized
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.completedNeighboringPreparationMap
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.completedNeighboringPreparationMap_isKrausCPTP
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.completedNeighboringPreparationMap_eq_normalized
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.completedNeighboringControlledMap
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.completedNeighboringControlledMap_sameBlock_apply
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.completedNeighboringPreparationMap_smul
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.s1Map
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.s1Map_block_eq_kronecker
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.s1Map_apply_of_ne
On a sector pair with \(a_kb_h\ne 0\), set \(\widehat\Omega _{k,h}=(a_kb_h)^{-1}\Omega _{k,h}\). If \(a_kb_h=0\), positivity and vanishing trace imply \(\Omega _{k,h}=0\); choose any density operator on that summand and denote the resulting completed density by \(\overline\Omega _{k,h}\). The sectorwise preparation is \(X\longmapsto X\otimes \overline\Omega _{k,h}\). Taking the orthogonal direct sum over the outer sectors \((k,h)\) gives the preparation stage \(\mathcal T_1\) of [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1523–1535 ] . The zero-weight choice makes the source map total without imposing a nonzero-weight hypothesis.
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.normalizedThreeSiteNeighboringDensity
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.inactiveThreeSiteNeighboringDensity
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.completedThreeSiteNeighboringDensity
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.completedThreeSitePreparationMap
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.completedThreeSiteControlledMap
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.t1Map
Define the channel from two physical sites to three physical sites by \(\mathcal T=\mathcal T_2\mathcal T_1\mathcal T_0\). Thus \(\mathcal T_0\) traces the neighboring subspins, \(\mathcal T_1\) adjoins the completed three-site neighboring density, and \(\mathcal T_2\) restores the three complete physical sectors. This is the refinement map in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1522–1545 ] .
For every outer-sector pair \((k,h)\), define
This is the direct sum of the two neighboring contractions appearing in the three-site closure factorization [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1510–1516 ] .
In the two-site sector coordinates, define
Thus the outer factors carry the identity, while the neighboring factors carry the operator \(\eta _{k,h}\). This is the local bond in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, Proposition C.8, lines 1581–1593 ] .
Let \(P\) be an orthogonal one-site projection and let \(K\) be an MPO tensor fixed by compression with \(P\) on its two physical indices. A physical support restriction consists of a dimension \(e\) and an isometry \(V:\mathbb {C}^e\longrightarrow \mathbb {C}^d\) such that
for which the restricted tensor \(K_P=V^*KV\) is injective and its inclusion into the ambient physical space recovers \(K\) exactly.
Transporting \(\mathcal T\) through the canonical two-site and three-site coordinate identifications gives a channel \(\widehat{\mathcal T}:M_{q^2}(\mathbb {C})\longrightarrow M_{q^3}(\mathbb {C})\), where all multiple physical indices are associated to the right.
Let \(F\) be a physical-sector factorization whose neighboring operators satisfy Definition 20.15.3.32, and let \(\widehat{\mathcal K}\) be its sector-coordinate tensor. Define
Here the second application acts on the first two sites and leaves the third site unchanged. Thus the superscript denotes two successive overlapping applications, as in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1821–1825 ] .
Let \(V_2\) be the two-site tensor product of the project’s coordinate map, so that \(V_2XV_2^\dagger \) expresses a physical operator \(X\) in sector coordinates. Thus \(V_2=U_{\mathrm{paper}}^\dagger \) in the convention of [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1581–1583 ] . Define
and identify pairs of physical indices with functions \(\{ 0,1\} \to \{ 0,\ldots ,d-1\} \). This is the physical two-site bond in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, Proposition C.8, lines 1581–1593 ] .
A vertical-sector family \(X=(X_\alpha )_\alpha \) is positive when every \(X_\alpha \) is positive semidefinite. Its total sector trace is
A purification RFP is viewed together with trace-preserving spin reduction by applying Corollary 20.6.7 to the ancillary trace map appearing in its purification equation. This records the structure obtained after tracing the ancillary indices in [ CPGSV16 , lines 761–764 ] , without adding a separate hypothesis to Definition 4.3.
Let \(\{ K_x\} _{x=0}^{g-1}\) be MPO tensors on a common one-site space. A proportionally realized orthogonal commuting sector family consists of pairwise orthogonal one-site projections \(P_x\) and positive two-site operators \(B^{(x)}\) such that
For every sector \(x\) and every \(N\geq 2\), there is a number \(a_{x,N}{\gt}0\) such that
For a purifying spin–ancilla tensor \(A\), the reduced spin density matrix is defined by
This is the coefficient form of the ancillary trace in [ CPGSV16 , eq. (4.7), line 751 ] .
An MPO tensor \(M\) has a bare global purification RFP witness if it satisfies the global purification equation for some purifying spin–ancilla tensor \(A\), and \(\widehat A\) is a pure-state renormalization fixed point: \(\mathcal{E}_{\widehat A}\circ \mathcal{E}_{\widehat A}=\mathcal{E}_{\widehat A}\). This records the displayed conditions of Definition 4.3 in [ CPGSV16 , lines 756–764 ] . It does not include the nondegeneracy implicit when the subsequent theorem speaks of density operators.
Given matrices \(A^{(i,k)}\) with a spin index \(i\) and an ancillary index \(k\), the associated MPS tensor on the product physical space is \(\widehat A^{(i,k)}=A^{(i,k)}\). This is the tensor whose finite-chain vector appears in the purification formula of [ CPGSV16 , lines 744–751 ] .
A retained-product spectral family records, simultaneously for every ordered pair of retained BNT copies, all nonzero normal corners, their positive spectral coefficients, and their local isometries. Its active labels form the dependent union of the local corner families; this union is enumerated by a single finite type. The local isometries and their inclusions remain part of the data, and their range projections can be formed when needed.
Retain the coordinates \((\alpha ,a,i)\), where \(\alpha \) labels a simple sector, \(a\) labels a diagonal entry of \(\mu _\alpha \), and \(0\leq i{\lt}d_\alpha \). The family \((Y_\alpha )_\alpha \) is represented on this space by \(\bigoplus _\alpha Y_\alpha \). Write \(\iota \) for this inclusion, \(\pi \) for extraction of the diagonal summands, and \(P=\iota \pi \). Composing \(\iota \) and \(\pi \) with \(R_\mu \) and \(\widetilde R_\mu \) defines their retained-coordinate forms.
Define \(\mathcal S_0\) by the three-site regrouping followed, for every outer pair \((k,h)\), by the partial trace over
Thus, writing \(R_{\Phi _3}\) for the regrouping reindexing,
The map \(\mathcal S_2\) is matrix reindexing along the inverse two-site equivalence. Thus
For an arbitrary virtual matrix \(X\), define the outer boundary operator on \(B_k^L\otimes B_h^R\) by
The map \(X\mapsto B_{k,h}(X)\) is complex-linear. No positivity of \(X\) or \(B_{k,h}(X)\) is assumed.
For a sector configuration \(k=(k_0,\ldots ,k_{N-1})\), let
Applying the one-site Hayashi decomposition at every site gives a bijection
We write \(\operatorname{reindex}_{\Phi _N}(M)\) for the matrix obtained by transporting both indices of \(M\) along this bijection.
Fix outer virtual indices \(\alpha _1,\beta _3\) with the chosen Hayashi decomposition, and let \(l_k,r_k\) be the sector tensors of Definition 20.15.2.50. For each pair of sectors \((k,h)\), the neighboring operator contracts the right sector tensor of one site with the left sector tensor of the following site over the virtual bond they share:
It acts on the neighboring bond space \(B_k^{R}\otimes B_h^{L}\). This is the operator displayed in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1441–1445 ] .
For a real \(n\times n\) matrix \(T\) and a real vector space \(V\), this structure consists of vectors \(|l_0),\ldots ,|l_{n-1})\in V\) and linear functionals \((r_0|,\ldots ,(r_{n-1}|\) on \(V\) satisfying the pairing identity \(T_{k,h}=(r_k|l_h)\) of [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2 ] together with the zero-correlation-length identity
displayed in the proof of [ CPGSV16 , Lemma C.5 ] . The vectors are the closed sector tensors obtained there from the sector splitting of an injective simple tensor.
Fix outer virtual indices \(\alpha _1,\beta _3\) and a Hayashi sector \(k\). The sector tensors are
These are the tensors of the factorization displayed in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1435–1448 ] .
In sector coordinates, let \(A_{k;x,y}\) be the virtual matrix obtained from the \((x,y)\) entry within sector \(k\). The sector-coordinate family contains all transformed physical matrices, while the virtual-matrix family consists of all matrices \(A_{k;x,y}\).
A tensor generating MPDOs satisfies this predicate if it has a normalized horizontal basis-of-normal-tensors decomposition whose basis elements all have non-nilpotent physical-trace transfer. This records the horizontal-canonical-form data of the already-blocked tensor \(K\) fixed in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, line 1628 ] .
The definition concerns this fixed representative. Its witness includes the global unit-weight convention of [ CPGSV16 , line 246 ] , whereas the non-nilpotency condition itself is unchanged by nonzero scalar rescaling. It supplies the Appendix C.2 hypothesis on the already-blocked tensor and is not the simplicity predicate of Definition 20.11.6, which quantifies over blocking lengths and presentations. No invariance under rescaling or replacement of the canonical presentation is asserted.
A tensor generating MPDOs is simple if there is a positive physical blocking length \(L\) such that the doubled-index tensor of the \(L\)-site blocking has a BNT sector presentation \(P\) for which every representative \(B_j\) has non-nilpotent physical-trace transfer \(\mathcal T_{B_j}\). This records the standing canonical-block convention of [ CPGSV16 , lines 217–246 ] together with the simplicity condition of [ CPGSV16 , lines 815–822 ] .
Every representative in \(P\) has a positive number of copies, and every copy has nonzero weight. The blocking length is existential, and presentation independence follows from Theorem 20.11.5. The definition omits the global unit-weight normalization of [ CPGSV16 , line 246 ] and does not require a normalized horizontal canonical-form witness.
For a one-site matrix \(V\), write \(V^{\otimes N}\) in the configuration basis as
If the copies of the \(j\)-th normal tensor have common coefficient \(\mu _j\), let \(\mathcal K_j=\mu _j A_j\) denote the representative with this coefficient absorbed into its local tensor.
A density operator on a periodic chain is a Gibbs state of a nearest-neighbor commuting Hamiltonian if
where the one-site spaces belonging to distinct labels \(x\) are orthogonal and \([h^{(x)},\tau _1(h^{(x)})]=0\). With the projector-limit convention of [ CPGSV16 , Definition 4.8, lines 829–850 ] , this is equivalently
with commuting neighboring translates. The orthogonal sum and the multiplicities are part of the definition. Definition 4.8 decomposes the global Hilbert space into the uniform product sectors and requires the associated one-site spaces to be mutually orthogonal; it does not impose a resolution of a larger one-site identity by the sector projections.
For \(N=L+K\), split a physical configuration into consecutive intervals of lengths \(L\) and \(K\), flatten each interval to a finite index, and denote the resulting bipartite form of the normalized periodic MPO by \(\sigma ^{(N)}_{L:K}\). The flattened local maps on the two factors are denoted by \(\widehat{\mathcal T}_L\) and \(\widehat{\mathcal S}_K\).
An MPO tensor \(M\) satisfies the strong renormalization fixed-point relation if it admits a matrix \(P\geq 0\) on the physical space and a unitary \(U\) on the two-site physical space such that, for all two-site physical indices \(i=(i_1,i_2)\) and \(j=(j_1,j_2)\),
Equivalently, the literal orientation of the source diagram is \(M_2=U(M_1\otimes P)U^\dagger \), with \(M\) on the left physical site and \(P\) on the right. There is no virtual change of basis and no scalar proportionality. This is the relation labelled Strong-RFP in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix D, lines 2109–2113 ] .
Let \(S\) be the finite set of physical sectors and let \(k=(k_0,\ldots ,k_{L-1})\in S^L\) be a retained sector word. For \(R\geq 1\) and \(x,y\in I_k\), define
where \(kt\) and \(xz\) denote concatenation of sector words and their corresponding fiber coordinates. The cases \(R=1,2,3\) are denoted by \(\Gamma _k^{(1)}\), \(\Gamma _k^{(2)}\), and \(\Gamma _k^{(3)}\).
Define \(\mathcal T_0\) by the two-site regrouping followed, in each pair \((k,h)\), by the partial trace over \(R_k\otimes L_h\). Its output is indexed by the retained outer factors \(L_k\otimes R_h\). Thus, writing \(R_{\Phi _2}\) for the regrouping reindexing,
The map \(\mathcal T_2\) is matrix reindexing along the inverse three-site equivalence. On each summand it sends
Let \(\mathcal K\) be an MPO tensor and let \(R\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\). A tripartite operator \(\rho \) is the three-site closure of \(\mathcal K\) against \(R\) if
This is the algebraic form of the three-site reduced operator in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1422–1433 ] .
Let \((\mathcal K_s)_s\) be a finite family of MPO tensors, with \(\mathcal K_s^{ij}\in M_{D_s}(\mathbb {C})\), and let \(R_s\in M_{D_s}(\mathbb {C})\). A three-site operator is a family closure when
Given a simultaneous left inverse \(C\) as in Theorem 21.3.83, contracting \(C\) against the first and third physical sites of \(\rho \) defines the outer inverse contraction
The closure is the sector-sum form of the displayed equation for \(\sigma _3^{(N)}\) in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1343–1348 ] , used with the block-canonical tensor in the Case II calculation at [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1726–1732 ] . The outer contraction is the sector-family form of the Case I contraction in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1415–1438 ] ; the same construction is used with sector projectors at lines 1719–1725.
Write the two-site bond on the ordered pair of physical indices, and identify a three-site configuration \((x_0,x_1,x_2)\) with the left-associated triple \(((x_0,x_1),x_2)\). These are common coordinates for the two bonds on sites \((0,1)\) and \((1,2)\).
Let \(B\) be an operator on two copies of a finite-dimensional space \(H\). On the right-associated space \(H\otimes (H\otimes H)\), define
where \(\alpha :(H\otimes H)\otimes H\to H\otimes (H\otimes H)\) is the canonical associator.
First pass to the physical basis selected by \(U\) and form the three-site closure of the resulting sector-coordinate tensor. Restrict this closure to the sectors \((k,l,h)\) and reindex its physical factors by
Denote the resulting matrix by \(\mathcal{K}_{3;k,l,h}(X)\).
Regroup three sites by
Equivalently,
The forward equivalence prepares the four middle subspins for \(\mathcal S_0\); its inverse is the shift \(\mathcal T_2\) in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1535–1540 and 1547 ] .
- MPOTensor.ExplicitEtaOperators.OmegaPreparationIndex
- MPOTensor.ExplicitEtaOperators.threeSiteTraceRegroupEquiv
- MPOTensor.ExplicitEtaOperators.s0RegroupEquiv
- MPOTensor.ExplicitEtaOperators.omegaShiftEquiv
- MPOTensor.ExplicitEtaOperators.t2ShiftEquiv
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.ThreeSiteMiddleIndex
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.S0PreparationIndex
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.s0RegroupEquiv
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.t2ShiftEquiv
A translation-invariant positive two-site bond determines finite-chain commuting-form data at every length \(N\ge 2\).
Define maps between the one-site and two-site simple-sector algebras by
The partial trace and diagonal-summand extraction define these maps on the full matrix algebras. Their agreement with the normalized maps in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.4, lines 1972–1979 ] is asserted on the weighted block-diagonal image. At this stage there is no assertion that the image is preserved, that the two maps are inverse, completely positive, or trace preserving, or that the sector labels have been matched. The final renormalization fixed-point conclusion is separate.
For an MPO tensor \(K\), its two-site blocking \(K^{[2]}\) has physical indices \((i_0,i_1)\) and \((j_0,j_1)\) and matrices
This is the blocking used in [ CPGSV16 , Theorem 4.9, lines 851–856 ] .
First pass to the physical basis selected by \(U\), so that each slice is written in the sector coordinates of Definition 20.15.3.3. Form the two-site closure of this sector-coordinate tensor, restrict it to the physical sectors \((k,h)\), and reindex its physical factors by
Denote the resulting matrix by \(\mathcal{K}_{2;k,h}(X)\).
In sector-adapted coordinates, regroup two sites by
Globally this gives the dependent-sum equivalence
The forward equivalence prepares the neighboring factors \(R_k\otimes L_h\) for the partial trace in \(\mathcal T_0\); its inverse is the shift \(\mathcal S_2\). These are the reorderings in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1521–1522 and 1555–1559 ] .
- MPOTensor.ExplicitEtaOperators.PhysicalSectorIndex
- MPOTensor.ExplicitEtaOperators.OuterSubspinIndex
- MPOTensor.ExplicitEtaOperators.NeighborSubspinIndex
- MPOTensor.ExplicitEtaOperators.SectorSiteIndex
- MPOTensor.ExplicitEtaOperators.BoundarySubspinIndex
- MPOTensor.ExplicitEtaOperators.EtaPreparationIndex
- MPOTensor.ExplicitEtaOperators.twoSiteTraceRegroupEquiv
- MPOTensor.ExplicitEtaOperators.t0RegroupEquiv
- MPOTensor.ExplicitEtaOperators.etaShiftEquiv
- MPOTensor.ExplicitEtaOperators.s2ShiftEquiv
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.t0RegroupEquiv
Let \(A\) be a tensor whose physical label is a pair \((a,b)\) of horizontal bond indices. For a bond matrix \(X\), define
The order of the entries of \(X\) is chosen so that \(A(X)_{ij}=\operatorname{tr}(M^{ij}X)\) when \(A_{ab,ij}=M^{ij}_{ab}\).
Let \(U_1\) and \(U_2\) be the physical coordinate changes in vertical canonical forms of \(M\) and its two-site blocking, respectively. Let \(J\) be the canonical relabelling from matrices indexed by pairs of one-site physical indices to matrices indexed by one blocked physical index. For the refinement and coarse-graining maps \(T\) and \(S\), define
These are the physical maps after absorbing the two vertical coordinate changes, as in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.4, lines 1955–1979 ] . They are intermediate maps on the retained physical coordinate spaces; the normalized sector maps \(R_1,R_2,\widetilde R_1,\widetilde R_2\) have not yet been composed with them.
Let \(F\) be a linear endomorphism of \(\mathcal A=\prod _\alpha M_{d_\alpha }\), and write \(\mathcal F=\{ X\in \mathcal A:F(X)=X\} \). For \(L\geq 0\), define
This is the product space used in the dimension argument of [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.4, lines 1980–1993 ] .
View the MPO tensor \(M\) vertically as the family of physical-space operators \(M_{ab}\) of Definition 17.4.4, indexed by the virtual indices, with matrix elements \((M_{ab})_{ij}=M^{ij}_{ab}\). A matrix \(P\in M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\) then acts on the tensor by
and on an \((N+1)\)-site chain by the first-spin operator \(P\otimes \mathbb {1}^{\otimes N}\). On the letters of the vertically viewed tensor these actions are the left and right matrix products, \((PM)_{ab}=PM_{ab}\) and \((MP)_{ab}=M_{ab}P\). The first-spin operators compose site by site, \(P_1Q_1=(PQ)_1\).
Let \(Z_T(X)\) be the matrix obtained by applying the normalized one-site embedding, expanding by \(U_1^\dagger \), applying \(T\), and relabelling the two-site indices, before compression by \(U_2\). Define \(Z_S(Y)\) in the reverse direction, before compression by \(U_1\).
For scalars \(c_\alpha \ne 0\), the map
is a linear equivalence.
For vertical BNT tensors \(M_\alpha \) with simple matrix algebras \(M_{d_\alpha }\) and a family of complex scalars \((c_\alpha )_\alpha \), define
For each \(L\geq 0\), let
Write \(V_m\) for the specialization obtained by taking \(c_\alpha =m_\alpha =\operatorname{tr}(\mu _\alpha )\).
In the inverse-map factorization, retain every physical sector and its factor spaces, and set
The physical-slice factorization is unchanged. This treats the zero-weight freedom left by the Hayashi decomposition used in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1415–1445 ] .
For words \(u=(i_1,\ldots ,i_N)\) and \(v=(j_1,\ldots ,j_N)\) in \(\{ 0,\ldots ,d{-}1\} ^N\), the word evaluation is
The empty pair of words evaluates to the identity, \(M^{\varnothing ,\varnothing }=\mathbb {1}_D\), and word pairs of different lengths evaluate to \(0\).
The operator generated by \(M\) on \(N\) sites is the matrix \(\rho ^{(N)}(M)\) indexed by configurations \(\sigma ,\tau \in \{ 0,\ldots ,d{-}1\} ^N\) and given by
An MPO tensor \(M\) satisfies the doubled-index transfer condition when its completely positive transfer map is idempotent:
This is the condition obtained from the doubled-index MPS view. It is not the physical-trace condition of Definition 20.5.2.
For a chain of length \(N=L+R\), call \(\rho ^{(N)}(M)\) diagonal if \(\rho ^{(N)}(M)_{u,v}=0\) whenever \(u\ne v\). Call \(M\) globally diagonal if \(\rho ^{(N)}(M)\) is diagonal for every \(N{\gt}0\). For configurations \(x\) and \(y\) on the two consecutive blocks, define
An MPO tensor \(M\) has zero correlation length when its physical-trace transfer is idempotent:
This is the literal fixed-tensor condition of [ CPGSV16 , Definition 4.2, lines 735–739 ] .
The physical-trace transfer of an MPO tensor \(M\) is the virtual matrix obtained by contracting the ket and bra physical legs of one tensor:
This is the transfer object appearing in the zero-correlation-length condition of [ CPGSV16 , Definition 4.2, lines 735–739 ] .
An MPO tensor satisfies the nonzero up-to-scalar physical-trace relation when, for some real number \(\lambda {\gt}0\), the following conditions hold:
The nonzero condition excludes the degenerate zero transfer, and the positive scalar makes the condition invariant under positive real rescaling of \(M\). This is a scale-invariant relation at the level of the generated state family. It is broader than the paper’s literal diagram, which fixes \(\lambda =1\) for the displayed tensor.
By combining the pair \((i,j)\) into a single physical index in \(\{ 0,\ldots ,d^2-1\} \), one obtains an MPS tensor with physical dimension \(d^2\) and bond dimension \(D\), with \(M^{\mathrm{MPS}}_{(i,j)}=M^{ij}\), identifying \(\{ 0,\ldots ,d{-}1\} \times \{ 0,\ldots ,d{-}1\} \) with \(\{ 0,\ldots ,d^2{-}1\} \) via the product encoding.
A (translation-invariant, PBC) MPS tensor with physical dimension \(d\) and bond dimension \(D\) is a collection of matrices \(\{ A^i\} _{i=0}^{d-1}\), where \(A^i \in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), indexed by a physical index \(i \in \{ 0, \ldots , d{-}1\} \). Such a tensor defines an MPV family. Diagrammatically,
The black node denotes the tensor \(A\), the horizontal legs are virtual, and the upper leg is the physical index \(i\).
The matrix product vector (MPV) of a tensor \(A\) at system size \(N\) is the vector
Equivalently, for a configuration \(\sigma = (i_1, \ldots , i_N) \in \{ 0,\ldots ,d{-}1\} ^N\), we write
The coefficient function \(\sigma \mapsto V^{(N)}(A)_\sigma \) gives the components of the vector in (2); the displayed ket is the corresponding vector in \((\mathbb {C}^d)^{\otimes N}\). For a general word \(w\), we also write \(c_w(A) := \operatorname{tr}(A^w)\). The MPV family generated by \(A\) is the collection \(\mathcal{V}(A) = \bigl\{ |V^{(N)}(A)\rangle \bigr\} _{N \ge 1}\). The coefficient \(V^{(N)}(A)_\sigma \) is the periodic contraction
of \(N\) copies of the local tensor \(A\), with the outer virtual legs closed by the trace.
The MPV overlap between two tensors \(A\) (of bond dimension \(D_1\)) and \(B\) (of bond dimension \(D_2\)) at system size \(N\) is
Diagrammatically, the overlap contracts the MPV ring of \(A\) against the conjugate ring of \(B\) along their shared physical indices, both virtual rings closed by the trace:
This pairing is linear in the first MPV coefficient and conjugate-linear in the second. By Lemma 2.7.4, it is the complex conjugate of the Hilbert-space inner product from Definition 2.7.2.
For the same fixed system size \(N\), block length \(L\le N\), and positive semidefiniteness of \(\rho ^{(N)}(M)\), the mutual information between a block of \(L\) spins and the rest is \(I_L=S_L^{(N)}(M)+S_{N-L}^{(N)}(M)-S_N^{(N)}(M)\).
A tensor \(A\) of physical dimension \(d\) and bond dimension \(D\) is a normal tensor if, after the spectral-radius normalization of [ CPGSV16 ] , (i) \(A\) admits no nontrivial invariant orthogonal projection and (ii) the associated CPM \(\mathcal{E}_A(X)=\sum _i A^iX(A^i)^\dagger \) has spectral radius \(r(\mathcal{E}_A)=1\) and peripheral spectrum \(\sigma _\partial (\mathcal{E}_A)=\{ 1\} \).
For an MPO tensor \(M\), a length \(N\), and a virtual operator \(X\), define the physical operator \(M_N(X)\) by
This is linear in \(X\). The displayed order chooses the cut of the cyclic virtual contraction immediately before the first site, so that \(X\) follows the last site. The one- and two-site operators are constructed in [ CPGSV16 , lines 638–654 and Definition 4.1 ] . When \(M=\mathcal K\), write these operators as \(\mathcal K_N(X)\); the cases \(N=2,3\) occur in [ CPGSV16 , Proposition C.7, lines 1510–1516 ] .
An MPS tensor \(A\) is a renormalization fixed point if there is an isometry \(V\colon \mathbb {C}^d\to \mathbb {C}^{d^2}\), with coefficients \(V_{(i_1,i_2),j}\) and \(V^\dagger V=\mathbb {1}\), such that, for all physical indices \(i_1,i_2\),
This is the relation \(AA=A\) in [ CPGSV16 , Definition 3.2 ] .
For an MPS tensor \(A\), a system size \(N\), and a block length \(L\le N\), let
denote the normalized state and the reduced state of the first \(L\) spins. The \(L\)-block entropy is \(S_L^{(N)}(A)=S(\rho _L^{(N)}(A))\). The tensor saturates the area law if \(S_L^{(N)}(A)=S_{L+1}^{(N)}(A)\) for all \(1\le L{\lt}\lfloor N/2\rfloor \) and all \(N\). This is [ CPGSV16 , Definition 3.13, line 600 ] .
Given a sector decomposition \(P\), these conditions define the normalized, left-canonical, aperiodic BNT surface used below. This is stronger than the abstract BNT of Definition 9.1.1 and the literal coefficient-form BNT of Definition 9.1.2: besides spanning and eventual linear independence, it fixes irreducible left-canonical representatives, their self-overlap normalization, gauge-phase separation, and the canonical-form weight normalization. It imposes no equal-modulus factorization or strict ordering on the raw weights. Explicitly, each basis block has positive bond dimension, is irreducible, and is left-canonical; the normalized self-overlap of every basis block converges to \(1\); the basis MPV family is eventually linearly independent; distinct same-dimension basis blocks are not gauge-phase equivalent after identifying equal bond dimensions; and the [ CPGSV16 , Section 2.3 ] canonical-form normalization holds,
The MPV expansion takes the raw two-layer form
matching [ CPGSV16 , Section 2.3 ] and [ CPGSV21 , Definition IV.2 ] . The canonical-form normalization admits every example of the source paper (in particular \(C \oplus D\), \(C \oplus (-C)\), \(C \oplus (1/2) C\), and \(C \oplus (-C) \oplus (1/2) C\)) and is not derivable from the per-block normality hypotheses alone.
A sector-weight tuple over \(g\) basis blocks consists of multiplicities \(r_j {\gt} 0\), nonzero weights \(\mu _{j,q}\) for \(q \in \{ 1,\ldots ,r_j\} \), and the sector coefficients
A sector decomposition consists of the basis blocks \((A_j)_{j=1}^g\) together with these multiplicities and weights. If \(A_j\) has bond dimension \(D_j\), then the flattened copy family has total bond dimension
- MPSTensor.SectorWeightData
- MPSTensor.SectorDecomposition
- MPSTensor.SectorDecomposition.toTensor
- MPSTensor.SectorDecomposition.totalDim
- MPSTensor.SectorDecomposition.flatDim_flatIndexEquiv
- MPSTensor.SectorDecomposition.flatWeight_flatIndexEquiv
- MPSTensor.SectorDecomposition.flatBasis_flatIndexEquiv_heq
For every type \(\alpha \), evaluation at the three coordinates gives the canonical equivalence
Its forward map is
An MPS tensor \(A=\{ A^i\} _{i=0}^{d-1}\) determines an MPO tensor by placing \(A^i\) on the diagonal in the bra and ket indices:
Equivalently, \(M^{ii}=A^i\) and \(M^{ij}=0\) for \(i\ne j\).
The transfer map associated to a tensor \(A\) is the linear map \(\mathcal{E}_A : M_{D}(\mathbb {C}) \to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) defined by
Diagrammatically, the transfer map is the double-layer contraction
in which the upper node denotes \(A\), the lower node denotes \(A^\dagger \), and the physical index is summed over between them.
An MPO tensor is in vertical canonical form if there are a basis of normal tensors \(\{ M_\alpha \} _\alpha \) for its vertically viewed tensor \(\widetilde M\), positive diagonal matrices \(\mu _\alpha =\operatorname{diag}(\omega _{\alpha ,0},\ldots ,\omega _{\alpha ,r_\alpha -1})\) with \(r_\alpha \geq 1\), and a matrix \(U\) from the physical space onto the retained nonzero sector space such that
This is the conclusion of [ CPGSV16 , Proposition 4.13, lines 1863–1870 ] . In this orientation \(UU^\dagger =I\) on the retained space, while \(U^\dagger U\) is its support projection in the original physical space. The reconstruction identity says that every letter of \(\widetilde M\) is supported on this projection, so the discarded orthogonal complement and the off-diagonal corners vanish. The orthogonal complement may be a zero sector: the source’s general canonical-form construction explicitly permits the sum of the nonzero block dimensions to be strictly smaller than the original dimension [ CPGSV16 , lines 214–225 ] . Since each \(\mu _\alpha \) is diagonal, the summand \(\mu _\alpha \otimes M_\alpha \) is the direct sum \(\bigoplus _{k=0}^{r_\alpha -1}\omega _{\alpha ,k}M_\alpha \) of weighted copies of \(M_\alpha \), so the right-hand side is a block-diagonal tensor over the pairs \((\alpha ,k)\) in which the multiplicities \(r_\alpha \) and the diagonal entries \(\omega _{\alpha ,k}\) stay explicit; the coefficients \(m_\alpha =\operatorname{tr}(\mu _\alpha )=\sum _{k=0}^{r_\alpha -1}\omega _{\alpha ,k}\) appearing in the renormalization fixed-point characterization are recovered from them.
The vertical direction of an MPO tensor exchanges the notion of physical and virtual indices [ CPGSV16 , line 943 ] : the vertically viewed tensor \(\widetilde M\) has its letters indexed by the horizontal bond pair \((a,b)\), and each letter is the operator on the physical space with matrix elements \((\widetilde M_{ab})_{ij}=M^{ij}_{ab}\). Concatenating \(\widetilde M\) vertically generates the matrix product vectors of the vertical direction.
Suppose that, after a change of coordinates, \(A\) is the dependent direct sum of tensors \(B_k\). If \(A\) has invariant-projector closure and no nontrivial periodic vectors, then every \(B_k\) has both properties. The assertion also applies to summands of dimension zero.
Every nonempty closed directed walk of length \(N\) determines a cyclic family of vertices \(v_0,\ldots ,v_{N-1}\). Each \(v_n\to v_{n+1}\) is an edge, where \(v_N=v_0\), and for any edge weights in a commutative monoid, \(\operatorname {wt}(w)=\prod _{n=0}^{N-1}\kappa _{v_n,v_{n+1}}\).
The canonical four-coordinate regrouping and its inverse satisfy
A finite Kronecker product of nonzero matrices is nonzero. Replacing one factor \(A_i\) by \(cA_i\) multiplies the whole finite product by \(c\).
Let \(I\) be finite, let \(p_i\) be weights in a type with zero, and let \(f_i\) take values in a commutative additive monoid. If \(f_i=0\) whenever \(p_i=0\), then
Let \(\mathcal A_1,\mathcal A_2\subseteq M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be nonzero linear subspaces. If \(XY=0\) for every \(X\in \mathcal A_1\) and \(Y\in \mathcal A_2\), then \(\mathcal A_1+\mathcal A_2\ne M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\). No vanishing condition on products in the reverse order is required. This is the matrix-algebra obstruction used in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1465–1470 ] .
Let \(A\) be an \(e\times d\) matrix and \(B\) a \(d\times e\) matrix, with \(d\leq e\). Then
Let \(E_k:H_k\to \bigoplus _lH_l\) be the canonical inclusion and let \(B=\bigoplus _lB_l\). For distinct \(k\) and \(\ell \), the corresponding inclusions have orthogonal ranges. The identities are
In particular, \(B\) commutes with the range projection \(E_kE_k^\dagger \).
- Matrix.sigmaBlockInclusion
- Matrix.sigmaBlockInclusion_isometry
- Matrix.sigmaBlockInclusion_conjTranspose_mul_of_ne
- Matrix.blockDiagonal'_mul_sigmaBlockInclusion
- Matrix.sigmaBlockInclusion_conjTranspose_mul_blockDiagonal'
- Matrix.sigmaBlockInclusion_compression
- Matrix.blockDiagonal'_eq_sum_sigmaBlockInclusion
- Matrix.blockDiagonal'_commute_sigmaBlockInclusion_rangeProjection
Let \({\cal K}\) be an MPO tensor with a physical-sector factorization and sector weights \(p_k\), and suppose that every neighboring operator \(\eta _{k,h}\) is positive semidefinite. On the active sector set \(I_*\), define the trace-squared matrix
Then, entrywise,
This matrix is a project derivation preparing the Case-I route toward [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, Lemma C.5, lines 1473–1499 ] ; it is not a matrix defined in that source.
Across the consecutive cut after the first \(L\) sites, the two marginals of \(\sigma ^{(N)}_{L:N-L}\) are the reduced states on \(L\) and \(N-L\) sites, up to the standard finite-index identifications. Consequently, \(I_L(M)\) is the ordinary bipartite mutual information of \(\sigma ^{(N)}_{L:N-L}\).
Let \(U:\mathbb {C}^n\to \mathbb {C}^r\) satisfy \(UU^\dagger =1\). If \(Z\geq 0\), then
For every \(W\in \mathbb {C}^{r\times r}\), one also has \(\operatorname{tr}(U^\dagger WU)=\operatorname{tr}(W)\).
Let \((P_i)_i\) be finitely many operators on \(H\) and let each \(\Phi _i:\operatorname{End}_{\mathbb {C}}(H)\to \operatorname{End}_{\mathbb {C}}(K)\) be completely positive. Then
is completely positive. No completeness or orthogonality condition on the \(P_i\) is required.
For a sector decomposition with basis elements \(A_{j}\) and weights \(\mu _{j,q}\), the physical-trace transfer of the assembled tensor is the block direct sum of the weighted transfers of the copies:
A vertex \(h\) is reachable from \(k\) in the nonzero sector support if and only if there is a finite directed walk from \(k\) to \(h\). Consequently, the support is recurrent if and only if every directed edge admits a directed return walk.
Suppose \(\eta _{q,h}\) has a rank-one trace factorization. For fixed boundary sectors \(u,v\), set
Then
This is the corrected edge contraction at [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1613–1617 ] .
If \(\mathcal S\) and \(\mathcal T\) are trace-preserving completely positive, then so are \(\widehat{\mathcal S}_N\) and \(\widehat{\mathcal T}_N\) for every \(N\).
For a physical word \(\sigma \) of length \(N+1\),
For a physical word \(\sigma \) of length \(N+2\),
Each sector product \(\prod _{j=1}^N\tau _j(B^{(x)})\) of an explicit GSNNCH decomposition is positive semidefinite; hence so are the represented operator
and every chain operator equal to a positive multiple of it.
Each sector product of an explicit GSNNCH decomposition is invariant under the cyclic shift of the periodic chain, where spin \(N+1\) is identified with the first; hence so are the represented operator and every chain operator equal to a positive multiple of it [ CPGSV16 , lines 838–842 ] .
Let \(B\) act on \(L\) consecutive spins of the periodic \(N\)-site chain, embedded at base site \(i\), and let \(r\) denote the cyclic shift of sites. Reindexing both chain configurations by \(r\) carries the embedded operator to its translate at the shifted base site:
An operator embedded into the periodic chain from a positive semidefinite local factor is positive semidefinite; in particular every translate \(\tau _i(B^{(x)})\) of a sector bond is positive semidefinite.
For every pair of sectors \((k,h)\), the spaces carrying \(\eta _{k,h}\) and \(\Omega _{k,h}\) are nonzero-dimensional.
Every left and right factor in a Hayashi sector is nonzero-dimensional.
Suppose that every multiplicity space is nonzero and every diagonal entry of \(\mu _\alpha \) is positive. For \(m_\alpha =\operatorname{tr}(\mu _\alpha )\),
Suppose that every multiplicity space is nonzero and every diagonal entry of \(\mu _\alpha \) is positive. The normalized embedding \(R_\mu \) sends a positive sector family to a positive retained matrix and satisfies \(\operatorname{tr}(R_\mu (X))=\operatorname {Tr}_{\mathrm{sec}}(X)\). Conversely, the sectorwise partial trace sends a positive retained matrix to a positive sector family and satisfies \(\operatorname {Tr}_{\mathrm{sec}}(\widetilde R_\mu (Z))=\operatorname{tr}(Z)\). These trace identities follow by summing the traces of the diagonal sectors; deleting the off-diagonal sector entries does not change the trace.
- MPOTensor.verticalMultiplicityTrace_pos
- MPOTensor.normalizedVerticalSectorEmbedding_posSemidef
- MPOTensor.normalizedRetainedVerticalSectorEmbedding_posSemidef
- MPOTensor.verticalSectorPartialTrace_posSemidef
- MPOTensor.retainedVerticalSectorPartialTrace_posSemidef
- MPOTensor.trace_verticalSectorBlockDiagonal
- MPOTensor.trace_verticalSectorBlockProjection
- MPOTensor.verticalSectorTrace_retainedVerticalSectorPartialTrace
- MPOTensor.trace_normalizedRetainedVerticalSectorEmbedding
Suppose that \(K_x\) is the periodic product of translates of a positive two-site operator \(B_x\), and that \(B_x\) is supported on \(P_x\otimes P_x\). If \(N\geq 2\) and \(1\leq L\leq N\), then the normalized marginal of \(K_x\) on the first \(L\) sites satisfies
Let \(S\) be a square matrix with entries in a commutative semiring, indexed by a finite set \(I\), and let \(N\geq 0\). Then, for \(a,b\in I\),
the sum, over length-\(N\) walks \(v\) in \(I\) from \(a\) to \(b\), of the product of matrix entries along the walk. This is an elementary combinatorial identity used to derive the cyclic-product form of \(\operatorname{tr}(S^N)\) in the Case-I route.
Recording the trace-preserving ancillary reduction does not change the purification RFP condition: \(\mathrm{PRFP}_{\mathrm{tp}}(M)\Longleftrightarrow \mathrm{PRFP}(M)\).
Let \((P_i)_i\) be finitely many orthogonal projections on \(H\), not necessarily resolving the identity, and let each \(\Phi _i:\operatorname{End}_{\mathbb {C}}(H)\to \operatorname{End}_{\mathbb {C}}(K)\) be trace-preserving and completely positive. Then, for every \(X\),
Let \(a,b,c,N\in \mathbb N\) satisfy \(a+b+c\leq N\). For configurations \(u,v\) on the first \(a+b\) sites,
where the sum ranges over configurations on the last \(c\) sites. The same identity holds after replacing an arithmetically equal block length by its canonical identification.
Let \(M\) be in normalized BNT-refined horizontal form, generate positive semidefinite ring operators, and satisfy the local renormalization fixed-point equations. This horizontal hypothesis is stronger than literal CPSV canonical form. Then \(\operatorname{tr}\rho ^{(N)}(M)\neq 0\) for every \(N\geq 1\).
Suppose that \(N=(a+1)+(b+2)=(a+2)+(b+1)\). The local closure equations imply
Suppose a tensor with scale-invariant source zero correlation length is gauge-equivalent, through block-diagonal copy gauges, to an assembled sector decomposition. There is a scalar \(\lambda {\gt}0\) such that every copy satisfies
If \(p_k=0\), then \((l_k)_\beta =0\) for every virtual index \(\beta \). Consequently, \(\eta _{h,k}=0\) for every sector \(h\).
Suppose a tensor satisfying the literal zero-correlation-length equation is gauge-equivalent, through block-diagonal copy gauges, to an assembled sector decomposition. Every copy satisfies
This is the block equation in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1652–1657 ] .
Let \(V\) be a one-site matrix, not necessarily square. Applying \(V^{\otimes N}\) to both physical legs of the length-\(N\) operator generated by \(M\) is the operator generated by the tensor whose one-site physical matrices are conjugated by \(V\).
Let \(M\) have source zero correlation length. For every \(N\geq 0\), the normalized \(N\)-site marginal obtained by tracing two sites from \(\sigma ^{(N+2)}(M)\) equals the normalized \(N\)-site marginal obtained by tracing one site from \(\sigma ^{(N+1)}(M)\).
This is the first replacement at [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, line 1613 ] . It does not imply the rank-one trace factorization asserted later on that line.
Let \({\cal K}\) be an MPO tensor with a physical-sector factorization and sector weights \(p_k\), such that the left tensor of every zero-weight sector vanishes. Then, for \(N\geq 1\), the sum over all sector labelings of the cyclic trace-square product reduces to the sum over active-sector labelings:
This is the reconciliation, flagged as an open reconciliation gap when Lemma 20.15.6.27 and Theorem 20.15.6.28 were added, between the full sector index set \(I\) and the active sector set \(I_*\).
For ket and bra configurations \(\sigma ,\tau \), \(V^{(N)}(\widehat M)_{(\sigma ,\tau )} =H^{(N)}(M)_{\sigma ,\tau }\). If \(p_0=(a,b)\) is the first doubled index and \(\sigma ',\tau '\) are the ket and bra configurations on the remaining \(N\) sites, contraction with \(Y_L\), \(Y_R\), and \(Y_C\) gives, respectively,
Let \(K\) be an MPO tensor and \(U\) an isometry on the physical space, \(U^\dagger U=1\). Then
where \(\widetilde K\) is \(K\) conjugated by \(U\) at every physical site. This is a project derivation preparing the Case-I route of [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1434–1448 ] (the basis change defining \(\sigma _{\mathrm{tilde}}\)); it is not a claim from that source.
Summing the diagonal word evaluations of an MPO tensor over all length-\(N\) configurations closes the vertical loops site by site,
and hence \(\operatorname{tr}H^{(N)}=\operatorname{tr}(E^N)\).
For every bond matrix \(X\), set
Under the hypotheses of the preceding theorem, the transported composites satisfy
Thus the one-site and two-site contraction families lie in the respective fixed-point spaces, as in Appendix C.4, lines 1974–1980. These equations do not assert that either composite is the identity on the whole sector algebra; that conclusion requires the fixed-point structure argument of Appendix C.4, lines 1980–1993.
Write \(\widehat R_2\) for normalized state preparation, \(\widehat{\widetilde R}_1\) for controlled partial trace, and \(W_i\) for retained-coordinate reindexing. The full-matrix extension of the transported coarse-graining map is
Write \(\widehat R_1\) for normalized state preparation, \(\widehat{\widetilde R}_2\) for controlled partial trace, and \(W_i\) for retained-coordinate reindexing. The full-matrix extension of the transported refinement map is
The contraction of the assembled vertical tensor is the weighted block diagonal of the sector contractions:
Suppose that
is a one-site vertical canonical-form identity. Contracting against an arbitrary bond matrix \(X\) gives
If the reverse letterwise identity is also given, then
These are the contracted canonical-form identities used in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.4, lines 1955–1979 ] .
Let \(\iota \) be block-diagonal inclusion of the weighted vertical-sector block family into its full matrix algebra, and let \(W\) be the canonical reindexing to retained physical coordinates. Then the retained-coordinate inclusion is \(\iota _{\mathrm v}=W\circ \iota \).
Let \(\pi \) be diagonal-block extraction to the weighted vertical-sector block family, and let \(W\) be the canonical reindexing to retained physical coordinates. Then the retained-coordinate extraction is \(\pi _{\mathrm v}=\pi \circ W^{-1}\).
Suppose that the physical maps are completely positive and trace preserving and \(U_iU_i^\dagger =1\). For positive sector families \(X\in \mathcal A_1\) and \(Y\in \mathcal A_2\), the matrices \(Z_T(X)\) and \(Z_S(Y)\) are positive and
After the final compression and sectorwise partial trace,
- MPOTensor.precompressionVerticalSectorT_posSemidef
- MPOTensor.precompressionVerticalSectorS_posSemidef
- MPOTensor.trace_precompressionVerticalSectorT
- MPOTensor.trace_precompressionVerticalSectorS
- MPOTensor.verticalSectorTrace_transportedVerticalSectorT
- MPOTensor.verticalSectorTrace_transportedVerticalSectorS
Suppose that every multiplicity space is nonzero and every diagonal entry of \(\mu _\alpha \) is positive. Then \(m_\alpha \ne 0\) for every \(\alpha \), and \(\widetilde R_\mu \circ R_\mu =\operatorname{id}\).
For a bond matrix \(X\), set \(V_2(X)=\bigoplus _\beta n_\beta A_\beta (X)\). Suppose that both vertical canonical forms satisfy their exact reconstruction identities, the two-site multiplicity spaces are nonzero, their diagonal weights are positive, \(S(\mathcal M^{(2)}(X))=\mathcal M^{(1)}(X)\), and \(U_1U_1^\dagger =1\). Then \(U_1^\dagger U_1 Z_S(V_2(X))=Z_S(V_2(X))\). This is the coarse-graining support identity used in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.4, lines 1955–1980 ] .
Under the hypotheses of Lemma 20.14.61, suppose in addition that \(U_2U_2^\dagger =1\) and that \(S\) is completely positive and trace preserving. Then \(\operatorname {Tr}_{\mathrm{sec}}(\widetilde S(V_2(X)))=\operatorname {Tr}_{\mathrm{sec}}(V_2(X))\).
For a bond matrix \(X\), set \(V_1(X)=\bigoplus _\alpha m_\alpha M_\alpha (X)\). Suppose that both vertical canonical forms satisfy their exact reconstruction identities, the one-site multiplicity spaces are nonzero, their diagonal weights are positive, \(T(\mathcal M^{(1)}(X))=\mathcal M^{(2)}(X)\), and \(U_2U_2^\dagger =1\). Then \(U_2^\dagger U_2 Z_T(V_1(X))=Z_T(V_1(X))\). This is the refinement support identity used in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.4, lines 1955–1980 ] .
Under the hypotheses of Lemma 20.14.60, suppose in addition that \(U_1U_1^\dagger =1\) and that \(T\) is completely positive and trace preserving. Then \(\operatorname {Tr}_{\mathrm{sec}}(\widetilde T(V_1(X)))=\operatorname {Tr}_{\mathrm{sec}}(V_1(X))\).
For an MPS tensor \(A\), the pure-state operator \(|V^{(N)}(A)\rangle \! \langle V^{(N)}(A)|\) equals the MPDO generated by the tensor \(M^{ij}=A^i\otimes \overline{A^j}\), acting on a bond space of dimension \(D^2\):
This is the single-ancilla case of the purification picture of [ CPGSV16 ] ; it lets the MPDO block-entropy theory apply to pure-state block entropies.
Let \(g\) be a block count, \(\dim ,\operatorname{mult}:\{ 0,\ldots ,g-1\} \to \mathbb {N}\), weights \(\omega _{\alpha j}\in \mathbb {C}\) for \(0\leq j{\lt}\operatorname{mult}_\alpha \), and blocks \(A_\alpha \) of bond dimension \(\dim _\alpha \). The vertical direct-sum tensor is the block-diagonal direct sum over the flattened index \((\alpha ,j)\) that repeats \(A_\alpha \) with weight \(\omega _{\alpha j}\), written \(\bigoplus _\alpha \bigoplus _j\omega _{\alpha j}A_\alpha \). Its matrix product vector decomposes as
Suppose that \(C\simeq C'\otimes E\). The partial trace over \(E\) is given entrywise by
It preserves positivity and trace.
The general three-site physical closure has coefficients
For \(M=\mathcal K\), this is the operator \(\mathcal K_3(X)\) in [ CPGSV16 , Proposition C.7, lines 1510–1516 ] .
Let \(A\) be an MPS tensor, let \(L\le N\), put \(m=N-L\), and write \(c=(\operatorname{tr}\rho ^{(N)})^{-1}\). Then the pure block entropy is the charpoly-root entropy sum of the \(D^2\times D^2\) bond environment:
The roots are counted with algebraic multiplicity.
For an MPS tensor \(A\) with \(V^{(N)}(A)\neq 0\), the reduced state \(\rho _L^{(N)}(A)\) of the first \(L\) spins is a density matrix: it is positive semidefinite and has unit trace.
Let \(A\) be a renormalization fixed point. For every \(L\ge 1\) and \(m\ge 1\), the operator-Schmidt Grams of the \(L\)-block and of the \(m\)-site complement are the one-site Grams:
Suppose that isometries \(V_k\) satisfy
Then \(A\) and \(\bigoplus _k\mu _kB_k\) have the same matrix product vectors at every positive length.
Let \(A\) be an MPS tensor of bond dimension \(D\). For a length-\(\ell \) configuration \(\sigma \) and a length-\(m\) configuration \(\tau \), write the operator-Schmidt factors as
The \(D^2\times D^2\) Gram matrix of the left factor equals the \(\ell \)-fold transfer map evaluated on a matrix unit:
where the sum runs over length-\(\ell \) configurations \(\sigma \). The Gram of the right factor \(R_m\) of an \(m\)-spin complement satisfies the bond-swapped identity
where the sum runs over length-\(m\) configurations \(\tau \).
For \(i,j\in \mathbb {Z}/N\mathbb {Z}\), if the two length-two cyclic supports starting at \(i\) and \(j\) overlap, then
Let \(M\) generate an MPDO whose finite-chain operator \(\rho ^{(N)}(M)\) is positive semidefinite with nonzero trace. For every block length \(L\) with \(2L+1\le N\), one has \(I_L\le I_{L+1}\). The implication \(1\le L{\lt}\lfloor N/2\rfloor \Longrightarrow 2L+1\le N\) shows that this contains the range of [ CPGSV16 , Proposition 4.5, line 801 ] .
Let \(A\) be an MPS tensor with \(V^{(N)}(A)\neq 0\). For every block length \(L\) with \(2L+1\le N\), covering \(1\le L{\lt}\lfloor N/2\rfloor \), \(S_L^{(N)}(A)\le S_{L+1}^{(N)}(A)\). This is the pure-state area law of [ CPGSV16 , Section 3, line 599 ] .
Let \(A\) be an MPS tensor of bond dimension \(D\geq 1\) with \(V^{(N)}(A)\neq 0\). For every block length \(L\le N\), \(S_L^{(N)}(A)\leq 2\log D\), uniformly in \(L\) and \(N\). This is the area law of [ CPGSV16 , Section 3, line 599 ] : the block entropy is bounded by a constant independent of the block size.
Let \(A\) be an MPS tensor of bond dimension \(D\geq 1\) with \(V^{(N)}(A)\neq 0\). For the purification MPDO of \(A\), whose generated operator is the pure state \(|V^{(N)}(A)\rangle \! \langle V^{(N)}(A)|\), the mutual information between a block of \(L\) spins and the rest satisfies \(I_L\leq 4\log D\), uniformly in \(L\) and \(N\).
Let \((A_k)_{k}\) be a finite family of block tensors of physical dimension \(d\), and fix a length \(L\); write \(A_k^w\) for the length-\(L\) word evaluation of \(A_k\) along a word \(w \in \{ 0,\ldots ,d{-}1\} ^L\). The finite-length spanning hypothesis is that the tuple-valued evaluations span the full product algebra of block matrices,
The corresponding finite-length separation property is that some length \(L\) makes the trace pairing against block words nondegenerate: there is a length \(L\) such that, for every tuple \((\Delta _k)_k\) of block matrices,
Spanning at length \(L\) gives separation at the same length: a trace functional that vanishes on every tuple \((A_k^w)_k\) vanishes on their span, hence on the whole product algebra, so nondegeneracy of the product trace pairing forces every \(\Delta _k=0\). Combined with injectivity, left-canonicality, and nonzero block weights, this finite-length separation supplies the older per-copy trace-separation hypotheses for the block-diagonal tensor.
The spanning hypothesis has an equivalent entrywise form. For a block index \(k\) and matrix entry \((a,b)\), let \(w\longmapsto (A_k^w)_{a,b}\) be the corresponding scalar word family, indexed jointly by the triple \((k,a,b)\). Linear independence of this scalar family already implies the spanning condition, hence the separation property, and hence the older per-copy trace-separation hypotheses directly.
The block-injectivity proposition of [ CPGSV16 , lines 340–345 ] gives a concrete sufficient criterion for the spanning condition: a common length \(L\) with every block \(L\)-block-injective, together with a length \(S\) at which, for every \(k\), there is a coefficient family \((c_w)_{w\in \{ 0,\ldots ,d{-}1\} ^S}\) with
Concatenating the injective prefix with this finite selector family produces the spanning condition at length \(L+S\), hence the separation property and the older per-copy trace-separation hypotheses.
- MPSTensor.BlockEntryIndex
- MPSTensor.wordEntryFamily
- MPSTensor.wordTupleSpanTop_of_wordEntryFamily_linearIndependent
- MPSTensor.hasBlockSelectorWords_of_wordTupleSpanTop
- MPSTensor.hasBlockSelectorWords_of_wordEntryFamily_linearIndependent
- MPSTensor.HasBiCF
- MPSTensor.hasBiCF_of_wordTupleSpanTop
- MPSTensor.hasBiCF_of_wordEntryFamily_linearIndependent
- MPSTensor.HasBlockSelectorWords
- MPSTensor.PropBlockInjective
- MPSTensor.wordTupleSpanTop_of_propBlockInjective
- MPOTensor.horizontalCFData_of_wordTupleSpanTop
- MPOTensor.horizontalCFData_of_wordEntryFamily_linearIndependent
- MPOTensor.horizontalCFData_of_propBlockInjective
If \(X\) is an operator on a spin–ancilla block, then for \(i,j\in [d]^L\),
For \(i,j\in [d]^L\) and \(x,y\in [d]^K\), applying the ancillary traces to both blocks across the cut \(L\mid K\) gives
Let \(A\) and \(B\) be MPS tensors, possibly with different bond dimensions. Suppose that \(U\) satisfies \(UU^\dagger =\mathbb {1}\) and \(A^i=U^\dagger B^iU\) for every physical index \(i\). Then \(A\) and \(B\) generate the same matrix product vectors at every positive length.
Let \((A_j)_{j=1}^g\) be a basis of normal tensors, with bond dimensions \(D_j\). There is a positive integer \(L\) such that the one-letter evaluations of the blocked tensors span the full product algebra:
Moreover, there is \(L_0\) such that, for every \(L\geq L_0\), the unblocked word tuples have the simultaneous span
This is the existence form of simultaneous block injectivity associated with [ CPGSV16 , lines 317–345 ] ; no numerical bound on \(L\) or \(L_0\) is asserted here.
Let \(A\) have a canonical-form MPV expansion
at every positive length, where the tensors \(\widetilde A_k\) are normal tensors of positive bond dimension and every coefficient \(\mu _k\) is nonzero. Let \((A_j)_{j=1}^{g}\) be tensors of positive bond dimension. Then \((A_j)_{j=1}^{g}\) is a basis of normal tensors for \(A\) if and only if:
every \(A_j\) is normal;
for every \(k\) there are an index \(j\), an invertible matrix \(X_k\), and a phase \(e^{i\phi _k}\) such that \(\widetilde A_k^i=e^{i\phi _k}X_kA_j^iX_k^{-1}\) for every physical index \(i\);
no two distinct tensors \(A_j\) and \(A_{j'}\) are related in this way.
This is [ CPGSV16 , Proposition 2.7 ] , read with the nonzero-coefficient convention of Definition 8.6.7.
Two BNT presentations of the same positive-length matrix product vector family have equally many representatives. After a permutation, corresponding representatives have equal bond dimension and are related by an invertible gauge and a unit-modulus phase.
The flip-configuration distribution is a probability distribution on \(\{ 0,1\} ^4\). The bond-pattern distribution takes the value \(41/128\) on the unflipped pattern, \(15/128\) on each of the four patterns flipping two cyclically adjacent bonds, \(9/128\) on the two patterns flipping two opposite bonds and on the fully flipped pattern, and zero on the eight patterns with an odd number of flipped bonds. Its one-bond marginal is \((5/8,3/8)\), and its two-adjacent-bond marginal assigns \(7/16\) to the doubly unflipped pair and \(3/16\) to each of the three remaining pairs. All the window weight families are probability distributions.
- CPSVExample410CorrelatedFlip.sum_flipProb
- CPSVExample410CorrelatedFlip.flipProb_nonneg
- CPSVExample410CorrelatedFlip.bondWeight_eq_bondWeightValue
- CPSVExample410CorrelatedFlip.bondWeight_nonneg
- CPSVExample410CorrelatedFlip.sum_bondWeight
- CPSVExample410CorrelatedFlip.oneBondWeight_false
- CPSVExample410CorrelatedFlip.oneBondWeight_true
- CPSVExample410CorrelatedFlip.twoBondWeight_false_false
- CPSVExample410CorrelatedFlip.twoBondWeight_of_pair_ne_false_false
- CPSVExample410CorrelatedFlip.oneBondWeight_eq_marginal
- CPSVExample410CorrelatedFlip.twoBondWeight_eq_marginal
- CPSVExample410CorrelatedFlip.windowWeightOne_nonneg
- CPSVExample410CorrelatedFlip.windowWeightTwo_nonneg
- CPSVExample410CorrelatedFlip.windowWeightThree_nonneg
- CPSVExample410CorrelatedFlip.sum_windowWeightOne
- CPSVExample410CorrelatedFlip.sum_windowWeightTwo
- CPSVExample410CorrelatedFlip.sum_windowWeightThree
The normalized reduced states on one, two, three, and four consecutive sites have characteristic-polynomial root multisets
These spectra are consequences of the corrected \(p=1/4\) tensor and are not formulas stated in the source.
The exact scalar ratio from the four-site calculation satisfies
For \(\tilde I_1=\tilde S_1+\tilde S_3-\tilde S_4\) and \(\tilde I_2=2\tilde S_2-\tilde S_4\),
The corrected tensor is locally purified and hence positive at every chain length. It has source zero correlation length.
- MPOTensor.CPSVExample410Operator.M_isLPDO
- MPOTensor.CPSVExample410Operator.M_isMPDO
- MPOTensor.CPSVExample410Operator.traceProjector
- MPOTensor.CPSVExample410Operator.physTraceTransfer_M
- MPOTensor.CPSVExample410Operator.traceProjector_sq
- MPOTensor.CPSVExample410Operator.physTraceTransfer_M_sq
- MPOTensor.CPSVExample410Operator.physTraceTransfer_M_ne_zero
- MPOTensor.CPSVExample410Operator.M_isSourceZCL
For the corrected tensor at \(p=1/4\) on the four-site ring, let \(S_L\) be the entropy of \(L\) consecutive spins, with natural logarithms. Then
Consequently,
The tensor has source zero correlation length and does not saturate the area law. These identities concern only the corrected fixed value \(p=1/4\).
- MPOTensor.CPSVExample410Entropy.blockEntropy_one
- MPOTensor.CPSVExample410Entropy.blockEntropy_two
- MPOTensor.CPSVExample410Entropy.blockEntropy_three
- MPOTensor.CPSVExample410Entropy.blockEntropy_four
- MPOTensor.CPSVExample410Entropy.mutualInfo_two_sub_one
- MPOTensor.CPSVExample410Entropy.mutualInfo_two_sub_one_pos
- MPOTensor.CPSVExample410Entropy.M_not_isSAL
- MPOTensor.CPSVExample410Entropy.M_isSourceZCL_and_not_isSAL
Let \(\tilde S_k\) denote the entropy \(\sum _x h(w(x))\) of the window weight family for \(k\) consecutive spins, with \(h(x)=-x\log x\) and \(\log \) the natural logarithm. Then
Divided by \(\log 2\) these are the printed decimals \(2\), \(2.9544\), \(3.8802\), and \(2.7839\).
- CPSVExample410CorrelatedFlip.entropyOne
- CPSVExample410CorrelatedFlip.entropyTwo
- CPSVExample410CorrelatedFlip.entropyThree
- CPSVExample410CorrelatedFlip.entropyFour
- CPSVExample410CorrelatedFlip.entropyOne_eq
- CPSVExample410CorrelatedFlip.entropyTwo_eq
- CPSVExample410CorrelatedFlip.entropyThree_eq
- CPSVExample410CorrelatedFlip.entropyFour_eq
For every positive \(N\), the ambient trace equals the binary partition function:
The supported one-site slices satisfy \(\widetilde M^{\iota (k),\iota (h)}=M^{k,h}\), while a one-site slice vanishes if either physical leg lies outside the image of \(\iota \). For every positive \(N\),
Let \(1\leq L\leq N\) and let \(x\in \{ 0,1\} ^L\). The effective-binary block state is diagonal, and its entry at \(x\) is
This includes \(L=1\) and \(L=N\). It is a project-derived consequence of the finite periodic model, not a formula stated in CPSV16.
- MPOTensor.CPSVExample411BinarySupport.internalEdgeProduct_eq
- MPOTensor.CPSVExample411BinarySupport.weightMatrix_pow_apply
- MPOTensor.CPSVExample411BinarySupport.sum_complementPathWeight_eq_weightMatrix_pow
- MPOTensor.CPSVExample411BinarySupport.sum_cycleWeight_append_eq_internalEdgeProduct_mul_pow
- MPOTensor.CPSVExample411BinarySupport.reducedBlockState_apply_eq_internal_mul_pow
- MPOTensor.CPSVExample411BinarySupport.reducedBlockState_apply
For every positive \(N\) and binary words \(\sigma ,\tau \),
These identities first concern the effective binary support model. The ambient definition below transports the operator and trace identities, but no spectrum, entropy, saturation of the area law, or zero correlation length assertion is made here.
- MPOTensor.CPSVExample411BinarySupport.mpo_M_apply
- MPOTensor.CPSVExample411BinarySupport.mpo_M_eq_diagonal
- MPOTensor.CPSVExample411BinarySupport.partitionFunction_eq_trace_pow
- MPOTensor.CPSVExample411BinarySupport.trace_weightMatrix_pow
- MPOTensor.CPSVExample411BinarySupport.partitionFunction_closed_form
For every \(L\leq 4\), let \(\rho _L:=\rho _L^{(4)}(M)\) be the effective reduced state and \(\widetilde\rho _L:=\rho _L^{(4)}(\widetilde M)\) the ambient reduced state. Let \(\chi _A\) denote the characteristic polynomial of \(A\). Then
For the positive block lengths \(L=1\), \(2\), \(3\), and \(4\), the full ambient root multiset is the effective multiset together with zero of multiplicity \(2\), \(12\), \(56\), and \(240\), respectively.
- MPOTensor.CPSVExample411Spectrum.ambient_charpoly_eq_X_pow_mul_effective
- MPOTensor.CPSVExample411Spectrum.ambient_charpoly_roots_eq_zero_add_effective
- MPOTensor.CPSVExample411Spectrum.ambient_charpoly_roots_one
- MPOTensor.CPSVExample411Spectrum.ambient_charpoly_roots_two
- MPOTensor.CPSVExample411Spectrum.ambient_charpoly_roots_three
- MPOTensor.CPSVExample411Spectrum.ambient_charpoly_roots_four
The effective binary tensor generates positive semidefinite periodic operators. On the ring of length four, write \(S_L=S(\rho _L)\). With \(h(x)=-x\log x\), where \(\log \) is the natural logarithm,
On the periodic ring of length four, let \(\rho _L:=\rho _L^{(4)}(M)\) be the effective-binary reduced state, and let \(\chi _A\) denote the characteristic polynomial of a matrix \(A\). Then
Here \(a^{[m]}\) denotes a root \(a\) of multiplicity \(m\). These are the effective nonzero spectra, not the full ambient root multisets.
- MPOTensor.CPSVExample411Spectrum.effective_reducedBlockState_four_eq_diagonal
- MPOTensor.CPSVExample411Spectrum.transition_counts_one
- MPOTensor.CPSVExample411Spectrum.transition_counts_two
- MPOTensor.CPSVExample411Spectrum.transition_counts_three
- MPOTensor.CPSVExample411Spectrum.transition_counts_four
- MPOTensor.CPSVExample411Spectrum.effective_charpoly_roots_one
- MPOTensor.CPSVExample411Spectrum.effective_charpoly_roots_two
- MPOTensor.CPSVExample411Spectrum.effective_charpoly_roots_three
- MPOTensor.CPSVExample411Spectrum.effective_charpoly_roots_four
For \(I_L=S_L+S_{4-L}-S_4\),
Consequently, the effective binary tensor does not satisfy saturation of the area law.
Let \(\rho ^{(N)}_2\) denote the normalized two-site marginal of the effective binary model on the periodic ring of length \(N\). For the constant-zero word,
The same values occur at the corresponding supported entries of the ambient two-qubit-site marginals. Hence neither the effective tensor nor its ambient realization has source zero correlation length. Moreover, their one-site traces give
Thus both displayed tensors fail the literal diagram in [ CPGSV16 , Definition 4.2, lines 735–739 ] .
The first obstruction uses the nonzero up-to-scalar physical-trace relation. The final inequalities concern its literal scalar-one specialization, not the distinct legacy convention based on idempotence of the doubled-index transfer map.
- MPOTensor.CPSVExample411BinarySupport.reducedBlockState_four_two_zero
- MPOTensor.CPSVExample411BinarySupport.reducedBlockState_three_two_zero
- MPOTensor.CPSVExample411BinarySupport.physTraceTransfer_M_ne_zero
- MPOTensor.CPSVExample411BinarySupport.M_not_isSourceZCL
- MPOTensor.CPSVExample411BinarySupport.physTraceTransfer_M_not_idempotent
- MPOTensor.CPSVExample411Ambient.reducedBlockState_supported_apply
- MPOTensor.CPSVExample411Ambient.reducedBlockState_four_two_zero
- MPOTensor.CPSVExample411Ambient.reducedBlockState_three_two_zero
- MPOTensor.CPSVExample411Ambient.physTraceTransfer_ambientM_ne_zero
- MPOTensor.CPSVExample411Ambient.ambientM_not_isSourceZCL
- MPOTensor.CPSVExample411Ambient.physTraceTransfer_ambientM_not_idempotent
The normalized four-site state is diagonal with probability \(1/8\) on the eight even-parity configurations and zero on the eight odd-parity configurations. Its relevant marginals are
Consequently,
so \(S(ABC)+S(B)=5\log 2{\lt}6\log 2=S(AB)+S(BC)\). Thus equality in strong subadditivity fails for this tripartition.
- MPOTensor.CPSVExample412Literal.fourCycleTripartiteState_eq_diagonal
- MPOTensor.CPSVExample412Literal.fourCycleTripartiteState_isHermitian
- MPOTensor.CPSVExample412Literal.traceC_fourCycleTripartiteState
- MPOTensor.CPSVExample412Literal.traceA_fourCycleTripartiteState
- MPOTensor.CPSVExample412Literal.traceAC_fourCycleTripartiteState
- MPOTensor.CPSVExample412Literal.fourCycleTripartiteState_entropy
- MPOTensor.CPSVExample412Literal.traceC_fourCycleTripartiteState_entropy
- MPOTensor.CPSVExample412Literal.traceA_fourCycleTripartiteState_entropy
- MPOTensor.CPSVExample412Literal.traceAC_fourCycleTripartiteState_entropy
- MPOTensor.CPSVExample412Literal.fourCycleTripartiteState_not_isSSAEquality
For every \(N{\gt}0\),
and \(\rho ^{(N)}(M)\) is positive semidefinite.
Tracing one site removes the \(\sigma _z^{\otimes N}\) term. More generally, every nonempty proper normalized \(L\)-site reduced state is \(2^{-L}I^{\otimes L}\). Therefore its entropy is \(L\log 2\), the mutual information is independent of \(L\), and \(M\) satisfies saturation of the area law.
The physical-trace transfer of the printed tensor is
Hence the literal representative satisfies the project’s scale-invariant source-ZCL relation with scale \(2\), but it fails the paper’s literal Definition 4.2 equation. It also cannot satisfy the trace-preserving fixed-representative condition. The tensor \((1/2)M\) is the likely intended correction, and the following theorem supplies its two trace-preserving completely positive channel equations.
The condition of Definition 4.8 constrains only the normalized density-operator family, and that family is unchanged by any nonzero complex rescaling of the tensor. The condition is therefore invariant under nonzero rescaling. In particular the normalized representative \(\widehat M=\frac12 M\) of Example 4.12 is not a Gibbs state of a nearest-neighbor commuting Hamiltonian.
Let
For every \(N{\gt}0\), its periodic operator is the normalized periodic operator of the printed tensor and has trace one:
It generates positive semidefinite operators. For \(p=(a,b)\in \{ 0,1\} ^2\), set \(\pi (p)=a\mathbin \oplus b\) and
The Kraus families \((C_p)_p\) and \((R_p)_p\) define trace-preserving completely positive maps \(\mathcal S\) and \(\mathcal T\), respectively, and for every virtual matrix \(X\) they satisfy
This proves the two channel equations in Definition 4.1 without further assumptions. Compatibility with the line-246 global unit-weight canonical convention is outside the conclusion of this theorem.
- MPOTensor.CPSVExample412NormalizedRFP.Mhat
- MPOTensor.CPSVExample412NormalizedRFP.mpo_Mhat
- MPOTensor.CPSVExample412NormalizedRFP.mpo_Mhat_eq_normalizedMPO_M
- MPOTensor.CPSVExample412NormalizedRFP.trace_mpo_Mhat
- MPOTensor.CPSVExample412NormalizedRFP.Mhat_isMPDO
- MPOTensor.CPSVExample412NormalizedRFP.pairParity
- MPOTensor.CPSVExample412NormalizedRFP.coarseKraus
- MPOTensor.CPSVExample412NormalizedRFP.refinementAmplitude
- MPOTensor.CPSVExample412NormalizedRFP.refineKraus
- MPOTensor.CPSVExample412NormalizedRFP.coarseMap
- MPOTensor.CPSVExample412NormalizedRFP.refineMap
- MPOTensor.CPSVExample412NormalizedRFP.coarseMap_isKrausCPTP
- MPOTensor.CPSVExample412NormalizedRFP.refineMap_isKrausCPTP
- MPOTensor.CPSVExample412NormalizedRFP.coarseMap_physClose2
- MPOTensor.CPSVExample412NormalizedRFP.refineMap_physClose1
- MPOTensor.CPSVExample412NormalizedRFP.Mhat_isRFPViaTS
The tensor \(M\) printed in Example 4.12 does not satisfy the GSNNCH condition of Definition 4.8 for its normalized density-operator family.
In the order \((00,01,10,11)\), one has \(x^1=(1,1,1,2)\) and
This is the recurrence in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix D, lines 2131–2145 ] .
Let \(A\) be obtained from any positive choice of fusion weights with the support prescribed in Definition 20.2.3. There are no \(r,s\in \mathbb {N}\) such that \(\operatorname {rank}\rho ^{(N)}(A)=rs^{N-1}\) for every \(N{\gt}0\). This is the operator-level conclusion in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix D, line 2125 ] .
Set \(\tau _+=(1+\sqrt5)/2\) and \(\tau _-=(1-\sqrt5)/2\). For every \(N\in \mathbb {N}\),
This is the transition-count formula in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix D, lines 2146–2176 ] .
The first two periodic transition counts are \(a_1=3\) and \(a_2=7\).
Let \(A\) be obtained from any positive choice of fusion weights with the support prescribed in Definition 20.2.3. Set \(\tau _\pm =(1\pm \sqrt5)/2\), as in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix D, line 2125 ] . For every \(N{\gt}0\),
This is [ CPGSV16 , Appendix D, lines 2122–2125 and 2157–2176 ] .
Let \(A\) have canonical-form data
For every \(L\geq 1\), \(A^{[L]}\) has canonical-form data with the same coisometry \(U\), the blocked normal tensors \(A_k^{[L]}\), and the weights \(\mu _k^L\):
In the phase-class grouping obtained from literal CPSV canonical form, let \(Q_{\alpha ,q}=\omega _{\alpha ,q}^{-1/2}X_{\alpha ,q}\) and \(W_{\alpha ,q}=V_{\alpha ,q}Q_{\alpha ,q}\), after identifying the bond space of each copy with that of its representative. Then
where \(c_{\alpha ,q}=\nu _{\alpha ,q}\zeta _{\alpha ,q}{\gt}0\). Moreover, every vertical letter is reconstructed exactly:
Let \(M\) be an MPO tensor whose doubled-index MPS tensor is in the literal CPSV canonical form, and suppose that \(M\) generates positive semidefinite operators on every nonempty chain. Let \(A\) be normal, let \(X\) and \(Y\) be invertible matrices, and suppose that
Then there is a real number \(\omega {\gt}0\) such that
Let \(M\) be an MPO tensor whose doubled-index MPS tensor is in literal CPSV canonical form, and let \(P\in M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\). If one vertical letter has a nonzero two-sided corner, then some finite-chain first-site compression is nonzero:
where \(P_1=P\otimes \mathbb {1}^{\otimes N}\). This is the separation assertion at [ CPGSV16 , Proposition 4.13, line 1898 ] , obtained from Lemma L in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.3, lines 1835–1858 ] . It uses neither positivity of \(H^{(N+1)}\) nor a grouping of the vertical sectors.
Under the same hypotheses, partition the normalized vertical sectors by equality of their matrix product vector families up to a fixed nonzero scalar per site. There are normal representatives \(M_\alpha \), an enumeration \(k=(\alpha ,q)\) of the original sectors, invertible matrices \(X_{\alpha ,q}\), and complex numbers \(\zeta _{\alpha ,q}\) of unit modulus, with \(X_{\alpha ,0}=\mathbb {1}\) and \(\zeta _{\alpha ,0}=1\), such that
The representatives are pairwise gauge-phase distinct and form a basis of normal tensors for the weighted block tensor \(\bigoplus _k\nu _kB_k\). Every grouped coefficient \(\nu _{\alpha ,q}\zeta _{\alpha ,q}\) is positive. With the physical isometries from Theorem 17.4.98 retained unchanged, one has both reducing identities, exact compression, and the literal reconstruction
For each pair \((\alpha ,q)\), the range projector of \(V_{\alpha ,q}\) obeys the representative-loop identity and gives a nonzero compression at some finite length. This is the decomposition and positivity argument of [ CPGSV16 , Proposition 4.13, lines 1898–1902 ] . The relative Gram identity and proportional-unitary normalization of lines 1903–1908 are not asserted here.
Let \(A\) and \(B\) be normal tensors of positive, possibly different, bond dimensions. Suppose that, for some nonzero \(\zeta \in \mathbb {C}\), \(|V^{(N)}(B)\rangle =\zeta ^N|V^{(N)}(A)\rangle \) for \(N\geq 0\). Then the bond dimensions are equal and there is an invertible matrix \(X\) and a scalar \(\eta \) of unit modulus such that \(B^i=\eta X A^iX^{-1}\) for every physical letter \(i\). This is the gauge recovery used in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix A ] .
Let \(e:\{ 0,\ldots ,d'-1\} \to \{ 0,\ldots ,d-1\} \) be a bijection and set
The transfer maps of \(A\) and \(e^*A\) agree. In particular, physical relabeling preserves left-canonical normalization and CPSV normality. If \(A\) has canonical-form data
then \(e^*A\) has the same weights and coisometry and the relabeled normal blocks:
The parity-sensitive tensor is an MPDO, and for every fixed \(L\geq 1\) the sequence \(K\mapsto I_L^{(L+K+1)}\) has no real limit. Thus the unrestricted thermodynamic-limit clause of [ CPGSV16 , Proposition 4.5 ] is false. An aperiodicity or convergence condition that excludes the parity oscillation is a genuine boundary condition, not a hypothesis of the printed proposition.
According to [ CPGSV16 , Proposition 4.5 ] , one has \(I_L\le I_{L+1}\) for \(L{\lt}\lfloor N/2\rfloor \), the mutual information is bounded in terms of the bond dimension, and the indicated iterated thermodynamic limit exists and is finite.
The monotonicity and finite-chain bound hold. The limit assertion is false without an additional convergence hypothesis. For the parity-sensitive positive MPDO of Theorem 20.7.13, the mutual information is \(0\) at odd chain lengths and \(h_2(1/3){\gt}0\) at even chain lengths, so the inner limit does not exist.
Let an MPO tensor admit the global purification equation of Definition 20.6.5. According to [ CPGSV16 , Theorem 4.4 ] , being a purification renormalization fixed point, having zero correlation length, and admitting the displayed trace-preserving purification form are equivalent.
This equivalence is false under the printed hypotheses. Positive-length equations do not detect nilpotent hidden bond sectors. Theorem 20.6.30 gives a nonzero matrix product density operator that is a purification fixed point but fails the literal physical-trace idempotence equation of Definition 20.5.2. The corrected local purification equivalences above require a tensor-level purification identity and do not recover the printed global statement.
Let \(\mathcal A=\bigoplus _{\alpha \in I}\mathcal M_{d_\alpha \times d_\alpha }\), let \(\iota :\mathcal A\to \operatorname{End}(\bigoplus _\alpha \mathbb C^{d_\alpha })\) be the block-diagonal embedding, and let \(\pi \) be diagonal compression. For a linear map \(F:\mathcal A\to \mathcal A\), set \(\widehat F=\iota \circ F\circ \pi \). Then:
if \(F\) is trace nonincreasing on positive elements of \(\mathcal A\), then \(\widehat F\) is trace nonincreasing;
if \(\widehat F\) is trace preserving, then \(F\) preserves the total trace on \(\mathcal A\).
Let \(\mathcal A\) and \(\mathcal B\) be finite sums of full matrix algebras, and let \(T:\mathcal A\to \mathcal B\) and \(S:\mathcal B\to \mathcal A\) be linear maps. Suppose that \(T\) is positive, both maps are trace nonincreasing, and \(S\circ T\) is trace preserving. Then \(T\) is trace preserving.
Let \(E\) be a directed relation on a set \(V\), and suppose that every edge \(a\to b\) admits a directed return walk from \(b\) to \(a\). Let \(G\) be a group and assign a weight \(\kappa _{a,b}\in G\) to each ordered pair of vertices. If the product of the edge weights along every closed directed walk is one, then there are vertex weights \(z_a\in G\) such that \(\kappa _{a,b}=z_a^{-1}z_b\) whenever \(a\to b\) is an edge. This is the graph-theoretic coboundary step needed to make the phase choices in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1446–1450 ] coherent across a recurrent support component.
Let \(N\geq 1\), and let \(A_0,\ldots ,A_{N-1}\) be nonzero complex square matrices, with possibly different dimensions. If their finite Kronecker product is positive semidefinite, then there are nonzero scalars \(c_0,\ldots ,c_{N-1}\) such that
Let \(A\) be an injective MPS tensor and \(B\) a tensor of the same bond dimension. If \(A\) and \(B\) generate the same matrix-product vectors, then there is \(X \in \mathrm{GL}_D(\mathbb {C})\) with \(B^i = X A^i X^{-1}\) for all \(i\). In tensor-network notation the gauge conjugates the local tensor on its virtual legs, with the physical index \(i\) on the upper leg:
Let \(K\) be the bond-two MPO tensor of Theorem 20.5.11, and let \(A_K\) be its doubled-index MPS tensor, an MPS tensor with four physical symbols. Then \(A_K\) is in literal CPSV canonical form: every letter is the weighted direct sum \(A_K^{(i,j)}=\mu _0A_0^{(i,j)}\oplus \mu _1A_1^{(i,j)}\) for \(i,j\in \{ 0,1\} \), with weights and bond-one normal tensors
Moreover, \(K\) saturates the area law: for every \(N\geq 2\) and every \(1\leq L{\lt}N\), the reduced state of the first \(L\) sites is maximally mixed,
Hence the mutual information \(I_L^{(N)}=S_L^{(N)}(K)+S_{N-L}^{(N)}(K)-S_N^{(N)}(K) =N\log 2-S_N^{(N)}(K)\) is constant in \(L\), giving \(I_1=I_2=\cdots =I_{\lfloor N/2\rfloor }\). Consequently, there is a bond-two MPO tensor whose doubled-index MPS tensor is in literal CPSV canonical form, which generates an MPDO, whose physical-trace transfer is idempotent, which saturates the area law, and which is not a renormalization fixed point in the sense of Definition 20.2.1.
The canonical-form decomposition follows the construction of [ CPGSV16 , Section 2.3, lines 214–245 ] . The decomposition and the entropy evaluation are project derivations; neither is asserted for this tensor in [ Kat24 ] or in [ CPGSV16 ] .
Let \(Z=\operatorname {diag}(1,-1)\) and let \(K\) be the bond-two MPO tensor whose nonzero physical letters are
For every \(N\geq 1\), its closed operator is
Its physical-trace transfer is
For every virtual matrix \(X\), the physical closures satisfy
Nevertheless, \(K\) is not a renormalization fixed point in the sense of Definition 20.2.1.
The tensor is the \(p=1/2\) example of [ Kat24 , lines 709–838 ] , after conjugating every physical site by the Hadamard matrix. Kato’s exact renormalization changes the tensor along the flow and the source explicitly states that this example is not a fixed point. The fixed-tensor-channel obstruction follows directly from the one- and two-site closure identities; it is not asserted as a theorem in that source. No canonical-form or strong-area-law conclusion is part of this statement. Theorem 20.5.12 establishes both conclusions for the same tensor.
- MPOTensor.KatoDeformedRFPObstruction.pauliZ
- MPOTensor.KatoDeformedRFPObstruction.siteSign
- MPOTensor.KatoDeformedRFPObstruction.tensor
- MPOTensor.KatoDeformedRFPObstruction.configurationSign
- MPOTensor.KatoDeformedRFPObstruction.mpo_tensor_eq_diagonal
- MPOTensor.KatoDeformedRFPObstruction.tensor_isMPDO
- MPOTensor.KatoDeformedRFPObstruction.trace_mpo_tensor
- MPOTensor.KatoDeformedRFPObstruction.physTraceTransfer_tensor
- MPOTensor.KatoDeformedRFPObstruction.physTraceTransfer_tensor_idempotent
- MPOTensor.KatoDeformedRFPObstruction.physClose1_tensor
- MPOTensor.KatoDeformedRFPObstruction.physClose2_tensor
- MPOTensor.KatoDeformedRFPObstruction.obstructionBoundary
- MPOTensor.KatoDeformedRFPObstruction.physClose1_obstructionBoundary
- MPOTensor.KatoDeformedRFPObstruction.physClose2_obstructionBoundary
- MPOTensor.KatoDeformedRFPObstruction.physClose2_obstructionBoundary_posSemidef
- MPOTensor.KatoDeformedRFPObstruction.physClose1_obstructionBoundary_not_posSemidef
- MPOTensor.KatoDeformedRFPObstruction.tensor_not_isRFPViaTS
Let \(A\) and \(B\) be nonzero complex square matrices whose Kronecker product \(A\otimes B\) is positive semidefinite. Then there is a scalar \(c\ne 0\) with \(cA\ge 0\) and \(c^{-1}B\ge 0\). Since \((cA)\otimes (c^{-1}B)=A\otimes B\), the rescaled factors represent the same product.
Let \(M\) be an MPO tensor whose generated \(N\)-site operator is positive semidefinite. Let \(A\) be an MPS tensor of bond dimension \(D'\geq 1\) whose \(N\)-site vector is nonzero. Suppose that, across the cut \(L\mid (N-L)\), the normalized state generated by \(M\) is obtained from the normalized pure state of \(A\) by trace-preserving completely positive maps \(\Phi _L\) and \(\Phi _R\) on the two blocks:
Then \(I_L(M)\leq 4\log D'\).
An MPO tensor satisfies the local purification RFP condition if and only if it has a local purification and its physical-trace transfer is idempotent:
Fix a local-purification representation
with purifying MPS tensor \(\widetilde A\) of physical dimension \(d d_K\) and bond dimension \(D'\). For every \(N=L+K\), tracing all ancillary degrees of freedom gives
Define the normalized-form purifying operator by
where the inverse scalar is taken with the convention \(0^{-1}=0\). After reindexing across the cut \(L\mid K\),
This identity also holds when the common trace vanishes, in which case both normalized-form operators are zero.
This is the finite-chain channel identity from the purification preceding equation (4) of [ WVHC08 ] , under the explicit local purification of [ CPGSV16 , Section 4.3 ] .
Let \(M\) be an LPDO. For every decomposition \(N=L+K\), there exist an ancillary dimension \(d_K\), a purifying bond dimension \(D'\), and a local-purification family \(A\). Let \(\widetilde A\) be its associated purifying MPS tensor. Then
Let \(M\) be an LPDO. There exist an ancillary dimension \(d_K\), a purifying bond dimension \(D'\), and a local-purification family \(A\), all independent of the cut, such that for every decomposition \(N=L+K\),
where \(\widetilde A\) is the purifying MPS tensor associated with \(A\).
Fix a local-purification representation with purifying MPS bond dimension \(D'\). If the \(N\)-site operator is positive semidefinite and its purifying pure state is nonzero, then \(I_L(M)\leq 4\log D'\) for every \(L\leq N\).
Consequently, if \(M\) is an LPDO, \(N\geq 1\), and \(\operatorname{tr}\rho ^{(N)}(M)\neq 0\), then its local-purification representation supplies a bond dimension \(D'\) satisfying this estimate. The quantity \(D'\) is the bond dimension of the purifying MPS, not the MPO bond dimension \(D\).
Let \(A\) be a finite Hermitian matrix. Choose an orthonormal eigenbasis \((u_k)_k\) with eigenvalues \((\lambda _k)_k\), and let \(E_k=|u_k\rangle \! \langle u_k|\) be the rank-one projection onto \(u_k\). Then \(A=\sum _k\lambda _kE_k\).
Let \(T\) be a finite real square matrix with \(T^2=T\). Then, for every positive integer \(N\), one has \(\operatorname{tr}(T^N)=\operatorname{tr}(T)\). This recovers the trace identity displayed in the proof of [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, Lemma C.5 ] from idempotence.
Let \(T\) be a nonnegative irreducible real matrix on a finite index set. Suppose that
for every pair \(i,j\). Then \((T^2)_{i,j}{\gt}0\) for every pair \(i,j\).
Let \(V\) be a module over a commutative ring, let \(l_1,\ldots ,l_n\in V\), let \(r_1,\ldots ,r_n\) be linear functionals on \(V\), and let \(T_{k,h}=(r_k|l_h)\) be the pairing matrix; for the tensors of [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2 ] this is the sector trace matrix. Assume the identity
whose right-hand side is the square of its left-hand side, so that the operator \(M=\sum _k|l_k)(r_k|\) satisfies \(M^2=M\). If the vectors \(l_1,\ldots ,l_n\) are linearly independent, then \(T^2=T\). The same conclusion holds if instead the functionals \(r_1,\ldots ,r_n\) are linearly independent.
In the setting of Theorem 20.15.6.56 with real scalars and linearly independent vectors \(l_1,\ldots ,l_n\), if in addition \(\operatorname{tr}(T)=1\), then there are real vectors \(a,b\) such that \(T=ab^\top \). This is the factorization \(T_{k,h}=a_kb_h\) obtained in the proof of [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, Lemma C.5 ] for the sector trace matrix, derived here from the displayed zero-correlation-length identity together with the linear independence of the \(l_k\), instead of the Perron–Frobenius trace-power argument of the source.
Let \(V\) be a real vector space, let \(l_1,\ldots ,l_n\in V\), let \(r_1,\ldots ,r_n\) be real linear functionals on \(V\), and let \(T_{k,h}=(r_k|l_h)\) be the pairing matrix, as in Theorem 20.15.6.56. Assuming only the identity \(M^2=M\) for the operator \(M=\sum _k|l_k)(r_k|\), without assuming linear independence of \(l_1,\ldots ,l_n\) or of \(r_1,\ldots ,r_n\), one has the following identities: the first unconditionally, the second for every \(N\geq 2\), and the third for every positive integer \(N\):
If \(\rho \) is positive semidefinite on a bipartite space \(A \otimes B\), then both reduced operators \(\operatorname{tr}_A \rho \) and \(\operatorname{tr}_B \rho \) are positive semidefinite.
Let \(T\) be a primitive real \(N\times N\) matrix, where \(N\geq 1\). Multiplication by a positive scalar preserves primitivity. If \(T^2=T^3\), then \(\operatorname{rank}(T^2)=1\). There are vectors \(a,b\in \mathbb R^N\) such that
This finite-dimensional matrix lemma supports the argument sought at [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, line 1613 ] ; it is not a theorem asserted there.
Let \(T\) be a primitive non-negative matrix. Then every row of \(T\) contains a strictly positive entry, and so does every column.
Let \(K\subseteq L\) be a faithful field extension, let \(\iota :K\hookrightarrow L\) be the inclusion, and let \(A\) be a finite matrix over \(K\). Then \(\operatorname{rank}_{L}\! \left((\iota (A_{ij}))_{ij}\right)=\operatorname{rank}_{K}A\).
Let \(V:\mathbb {C}^d\to \mathbb {C}^e\) satisfy \(V^*V=I_d\), and let \(A\) be a \(d\times d\) matrix. Then \(d\leq e\) and
Equivalently, the roots of \(\chi _{VAV^*}\) are the roots of \(\chi _A\) together with zero of multiplicity \(e-d\).
Let \(P\in M_{m}(\mathbb {C})\) be an orthogonal projection, let \(\rho \in M_{n}(\mathbb {C})\) be positive semidefinite with \(\operatorname{tr}(\rho )=1\), and let \(\mathcal E\colon M_{m}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{n}(\mathbb {C})\) be completely positive. Define the trace-and-prepare map and its complementary restriction by
Both maps are completely positive, and \(\mathcal D_\rho \) is trace-preserving. If
for every \(X\in M_{m}(\mathbb {C})\), then the completion
is trace-preserving and completely positive. It agrees with \(\mathcal E\) on every matrix supported by \(P\):
- Matrix.supportCompletion_isKrausCPTP
- Matrix.tracePrepareMap_trace
- Matrix.tracePrepareMap_isKrausCP
- Matrix.tracePrepareMap_isKrausCPTP
- Matrix.supportComplementMap
- Matrix.supportComplementMap_apply
- Matrix.supportComplementMap_isKrausCP
- Matrix.supportComplementMap_trace
- Matrix.supportCompletion
- Matrix.supportCompletion_apply
- Matrix.supportCompletion_isKrausCP
- Matrix.supportCompletion_trace
- Matrix.supportCompletion_apply_of_supported
Let \(I\) be a finite set with at least two elements, and let \(P,S\in \mathbb R^{I\times I}\). Suppose that \(P\) is primitive and row-stochastic, and that, for all \(i,j\in I\),
Then, as \(N\to \infty \),
This project matrix-theoretic lemma is used in the Case-I argument. It is not a separately stated result of [ CPGSV16 ] .
Let \(K\) be exactly gauge equivalent, by an invertible virtual matrix \(G\), to a canonical BNT sum. Suppose that the repeated-copy weights agree within each fixed representative and have been absorbed into tensors \((\mathcal K_s)_s\). Let \((P_s)_s\) be orthogonal projections on the one-site physical space such that
Suppose also that, for every \(s\) and every pair of virtual indices \(\beta ,\alpha \), the corresponding physical slice satisfies
If every blocked representative \(\mathcal K_s^{[2]}\) is a renormalization fixed point via trace-preserving completely positive maps, then \(K^{[2]}\) is also such a renormalization fixed point.
The global maps first measure the outer sector on the first original site of the blocked input. On one blocked site the corresponding projection is \(P_s\otimes I\); on two blocked sites it acts on the first original site and as the identity on the remaining three. For every virtual boundary \(X\), the boundary supplied to sector \(s\) is the sum of the diagonal copy blocks of \(G^{-1}XG\) over that representative. The same boundary is used in the length-two and length-four identities. This is the conditional composition underlying [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1646–1665 and 1810–1825 ] ; it is not the printed implication (iv)\(\Rightarrow \)(v) of Theorem 4.9.
- MPOTensor.blockedOneChainEquiv
- MPOTensor.blockedTwoChainEquiv
- MPOTensor.equivReindexMap_symm_apply_self
- MPOTensor.equivReindexMap_physCloseN_two_eq_physClose1_blockTwo
- MPOTensor.equivReindexMap_physCloseN_four_eq_physClose2_blockTwo
- MPOTensor.blockedFirstSiteProjection
- MPOTensor.blockedFirstSiteProjection_eq_reindex_kronecker_one
- MPOTensor.firstSiteMatrix_mul_physCloseN_of_mul_physicalSlice
- MPOTensor.firstSiteMatrix_mul_physCloseN_eq_zero_of_mul_physicalSlice_eq_zero
- MPOTensor.physCloseN_mul_firstSiteMatrix_of_physicalSlice_mul
- MPOTensor.singleKrausMap_firstSiteMatrix_physCloseN_of_twoSidedSupport
- MPOTensor.firstSiteMatrix_isStarProjection
- MPOTensor.sum_firstSiteMatrix_eq_one
- MPOTensor.singleKrausMap_firstSiteMatrix_physCloseN_eq_ite
- MPOTensor.coarseningMapInChainCoordinates
- MPOTensor.refinementMapInChainCoordinates
- MPOTensor.coarseningMapInChainCoordinates_isKrausCPTP
- MPOTensor.refinementMapInChainCoordinates_isKrausCPTP
- MPOTensor.coarseningMapInChainCoordinates_physCloseN
- MPOTensor.refinementMapInChainCoordinates_physCloseN
- MPOTensor.exists_chainCoordinateRFP_of_projectiveSectorDecomposition
- MPOTensor.blockTwo_isRFPViaTS_of_chainCoordinateRFP
- MPOTensor.blockTwo_isRFPViaTS_of_commonWeightAbsorbedBNTChannels
Retain the hypotheses of Theorem 20.15.7.45, except that the pairwise orthogonal outer support projections are not required to sum to the identity. If every blocked absorbed representative is a renormalization fixed point via trace-preserving completely positive maps, then the blocked complete tensor is also such a fixed point.
Let \(K\) be an MPDO tensor in biCF, written up to a block-diagonal gauge as a weighted BNT direct sum whose BNT representatives have nonnilpotent physical-trace transfers. Suppose that the weights over each BNT label are copy-independent, \(\mu _{s,q}=\mu _{s,q'}\), and that \(K\) saturates the area law and satisfies literal zero correlation length, \(\mathcal T_K^2=\mathcal T_K\). For every BNT label \(s\), let \(\mathcal K_s=\mu _sA_s\) be the absorbed BNT representative. Then \(\mathcal K_s\) is one-site injective, generates positive semidefinite operators on every nonempty periodic chain, saturates the area law, and satisfies
Let \(K\) be gauge equivalent to the weighted direct sum of BNT representatives \(A_s\), with copy weights \(\mu _{s,q}\). If its physical-trace transfer is literally idempotent, then every weighted copy satisfies
If the copy weights over \(A_s\) agree and \(\mathcal K_s=\mu _sA_s\), then
Suppose the weights over each BNT representative are copy-independent. For \(\mathcal K_s=\mu _sA_s\) and \(\mathcal B_s=\mathcal T_{A_s}\), one has
Let \(K\) saturate the area law and have zero correlation length, and let its horizontal BNT canonical form, up to block-diagonal gauge, have normal representatives \(A_s\), common copy weights \(\mu _s\), and copy numbers \(n_s\). Assume that the physical-trace transfer of every \(A_s\) is nonnilpotent. After a common blocking, assume explicitly that the simultaneous one-letter word tuples of the \(A_s\) span the direct sum of their full matrix algebras. Put \(\mathcal K_s=\mu _sA_s\).
For every nonempty chain, define
Then \(p_s^{(N)}{\gt}0\), and every nonempty prefix marginal has the same sector decomposition with these probabilities. Translation invariance identifies the other contiguous blocks of the same length. Consequently, every absorbed representative \(\mathcal K_s\) saturates the area law.
The one-letter simultaneous span is the block-injective canonical-form hypothesis imposed at the start of Case II in [ CPGSV16 , line 1628 ] . Its relation with finite physical blocking is recorded in [ con26u ] . The entropy conclusion is the argument of [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1748–1781 ] .
- MPOTensor.bntSectorProbability
- MPOTensor.bntSectorProbability_pos
- MPOTensor.normalizedMPO_eq_sum_bntSectorProbability_smul
- MPOTensor.reducedBlockState_eq_sum_bntSectorProbability_smul
- MPOTensor.blockEntropy_eq_sum_bntSectorProbability
- MPOTensor.blockEntropy_add_blockEntropy_eq_bntSector
- MPOTensor.commonWeightAbsorbedBasisMPOTensor_isSAL_of_projectorSelection
- MPOTensor.commonWeightAbsorbedBasisMPOTensor_isSAL_of_sameMPV₂Pos
Let \(K\) be a simple tensor in its chosen canonical form and suppose that \(K\) has scale-invariant source zero correlation length. Then the copy weights over each normal representative \(A_s\) agree. For every \(A_s\) with non-nilpotent physical-trace transfer \(\mathcal B_s\), absorb the common weight and write \(\mathcal K_s=\mu _sA_s\). Each absorbed BNT representative \(\mathcal K_s\) has scale-invariant source zero correlation length. More precisely, \(\mathcal T_{\mathcal K_s}=\mu _s\mathcal B_s\ne 0\) and, for some \(\lambda {\gt}0\),
This is the final zero-correlation-length conclusion in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, line 1781 ] .
Let \(M\) be exactly gauge equivalent, by an invertible virtual matrix \(G\), to a canonical BNT sum whose repeated-copy weights agree within each fixed representative and have been absorbed into tensors \((\mathcal K_s)_s\). Suppose that the simultaneous one-site tuples of the decomposition span the product of the virtual matrix algebras and that distinct absorbed representatives satisfy the unstarred layer orthogonality identities. If every \(\mathcal K_s\) carries a physical-sector factorization with positive semidefinite neighboring operators \(\eta ^s_{k,h}\) and real families \((a^s_k)_k,(b^s_k)_k\) with
then \(M^{[2]}\) is a renormalization fixed point via trace-preserving completely positive maps. In particular, this conclusion holds whenever every representative carries a single-sector factorization whose sole neighboring operator is positive semidefinite of unit trace, since the coefficient families may then be taken identically one. The factorizations are assumed here; deriving them from the strong area law and zero correlation length is the remaining step of the source implication and stays open in Theorem 20.15.7.48.
Let the complete tensor \(B\) be exactly gauge equivalent, by an invertible virtual matrix \(G\), to a sector decomposition: an arbitrary finite family of basis blocks \(A_j\), \(j=1,\ldots ,g\), each carrying a copy multiplicity \(r_j\) and nonzero weights \(\mu _{j,q}\). Suppose that the repeated-copy weights over each basis block are equal, with no equality required between different basis blocks, and absorb this common weight into its representative \(\mathcal K_j\) as in Definition 20.15.1.7. Then, for every length \(N\) and every virtual boundary \(X\), the physical closure of the complete tensor is the sum of the absorbed-representative closures, with the boundary of a representative given by the sum of the diagonal copy blocks of \(G^{-1}XG\) lying over it:
Neither the conjugation \(X\mapsto G^{-1}XG\) nor the subsequent sum of diagonal copy blocks depends on \(N\). In particular, the same representative boundary map applies at the two lengths entering the two channel equations of Definition 20.2.1. This is the arbitrary-boundary form of the block calculation used in [ CPGSV16 , lines 186–195 and Appendix C.2, lines 1646–1665 and 1810–1825 ] .
Suppose that the active one-site matrices span \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) and each active sector contains a nonzero such matrix. Then for every \(k,h\in I_*\) there is a directed walk
such that \(\eta _{k_j,k_{j+1}}\ne 0\). In particular, every active sector has an outgoing nonzero neighboring operator.
For every sector entry, the one-site matrix used in the directed-cut argument equals the virtual matrix used in the spanning argument. If all sector virtual matrices span \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) and the matrices in every zero-weight sector vanish, then \(\operatorname{span}\{ A_{k;x,y}:k\in I_*\} =M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\).
Let \(K\) be injective and let
be a physical-sector factorization whose neighboring operators are positive semidefinite. Call \(k\) active when both families \(\{ l_{k,\beta }\} _\beta \) and \(\{ r_{k,\alpha }\} _\alpha \) contain a nonzero member. For every active \(k\), the two factor spans are closed under conjugate transpose. If \(P_k^L\) and \(P_k^R\) are their respective joint column-support projections, then
Moreover, there are positive integers \(p_k,q_k\) and isometries
whose range projections are \(P_k^L\) and \(P_k^R\). If \(k\) is inactive, every product \(l_{k,\beta }\otimes r_{k,\alpha }\) vanishes; in particular, there is no active sector when the virtual dimension is zero.
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.sectorProductFamily
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.IsActiveSector
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.isActiveSector_iff_exists_sectorProductFamily_ne_zero
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.not_isActiveSector_iff
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.not_isActiveSector_iff_left_or_right_eq_zero
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.not_isActiveSector_bondDim_zero
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.sectorCoordinateTensor_isInjective
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.sectorCoordinateTensor_isMPDO_of_neighboringOperator_pos
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.sectorProductFamily_conjTranspose_mem_span
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.leftTensor_conjTranspose_mem_span_of_isActiveSector
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.rightTensor_conjTranspose_mem_span_of_isActiveSector
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.leftFactorSupportProj
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.rightFactorSupportProj
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.activeSector_factorSupport_twoSided
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.sectorProductFamily_supportProj
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.exists_activeSector_factorSupportIsometries
In the setting of Theorem 20.15.8.14, the restricted tensor \(K_{\mathrm{act}}\) has a physical-sector factorization indexed precisely by the active ambient sectors. For active sectors \(k,h\), put
Its neighboring operator is
In particular, every \(\eta ^{\mathrm{act}}_{k,h}\) is positive semidefinite. If the active family is empty, the restricted factorization has no sectors and the assertion is vacuous.
Suppose moreover that the ambient neighboring operators admit real coefficients \(a_k,b_h\) such that
For the active-sector correspondence \(j\mapsto k(j)\), set \(\widetilde a_j=a_{k(j)}\) and \(\widetilde b_j=b_{k(j)}\). Then
The identities being preserved are those of CPSV16 Theorem 4.9(iv), equations tralktrrk and PsiPhi, lines 864–889 [ CPGSV16 ] . Their transport through the active physical support compression is an auxiliary construction, not an assertion of that source theorem; see [ con26d ] .
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.FactorActiveSector
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.activeRestrictedPhysicalSectorFactorization
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.activeRestrictedPhysicalSectorFactorization_neighboringOperator_eq_congruence
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.activeRestrictedPhysicalSectorFactorization_neighboringOperator_posSemidef
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.ActivePhysicalCompressionWitness
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.ActivePhysicalCompressionWitness.factorizationForRestrictionData
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.ActivePhysicalCompressionWitness.neighboringOperator_trace
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.ActivePhysicalCompressionWitness.neighboringTraceFactorization
Let \(K\) be injective and let
be a physical-sector factorization whose neighboring operators are positive semidefinite. In every active sector choose isometries onto the joint column supports of the left and right factor families, and retain no coordinates in an inactive sector. Their direct sum, transported back by \(U^*\), is an isometry
whose range projection is the canonical joint column support \(P_K\) of the physical slices of \(K\). The restricted tensor \(K_{\mathrm{act}}=V^*KV\) is injective, satisfies
and, in the dependent sector coordinates, has physical slices
This construction also applies when every sector is inactive: then \(e=0\), with no complementary summand added.
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.ActiveFactorSupportData
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.physicalSupportInclusion
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.physicalSupportInclusion_isometry
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.physicalSupportInclusion_range_eq_physicalSupportProj
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.reindex_physicalSlice_activePhysicalSupportRestriction
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.changePhysicalBasis_physicalSupportInclusion_activePhysicalSupportRestriction
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.activePhysicalSupportRestrictionData
Suppose that \(M\) is in normalized BNT-refined horizontal form and generates positive operators. Assume exact coisometric reconstructions of its one-site and blocked vertical tensors, positive multiplicities and weights for the blocked BNT, and normality of its BNT representatives. For every active product corner \(j\), one has \(0{\lt}\lambda _j\zeta _j\).
Assume that \(M\) generates matrix product density operators and that the one-site and blocked vertical tensors admit exact coisometric reconstructions. Assume positive multiplicities and weights for the blocked BNT and normality of its representatives. Suppose moreover that every projection with a nonzero two-sided corner of the blocked vertical tensor has a nonzero finite-chain sector compression. Then every active product corner \(j\) satisfies \(0{\lt}\lambda _j\zeta _j\).
Suppose that the one-site vertical tensor has the stated exact coisometric reconstruction, and let \((A^{(2)}_\gamma )_\gamma \) be a basis of normal tensors for the blocked vertical tensor. For every active product corner \(A_j\) there are a label \(\gamma (j)\), an equality of bond dimensions, an invertible matrix \(X_j\), and a scalar \(\zeta _j\) of modulus one such that, after transporting the blocked tensor along the dimension equality,
The choices may be made simultaneously. No converse coverage or surjectivity of \(j\mapsto \gamma (j)\) is asserted.
Scope restriction (active product BNT): The conclusion gives only one-way coverage of active product corners. It does not assert that every blocked BNT label occurs. This is documented in [ con26c ] .
Local fix (per-pair support): Appendix C.4, lines 2011–2029 of [ CPGSV16 ] compares a sum over all retained copy pairs and does not isolate a fixed pair. Here fixed-pair support follows from the exact squared reconstruction and the canonical direct-sum corner; a zero pair contributes an empty active family. See [ con26q ] .
Under the hypotheses of the preceding positivity theorem, for every active product corner \(j\) there is a real number \(\omega _j{\gt}0\) such that
This is the gauge normalization used in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.4, lines 2025–2029 ] .
Suppose that the active one-site matrices span \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) and each active sector contains a nonzero such matrix. For every \(S\subseteq I_*\), \({\cal A}_S+{\cal A}_{I_*\setminus S}=M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), and both spaces are nonzero when the corresponding sector sets are nonempty. If \(\eta _{k,h}=0\) for \(k\in S\) and \(h\in C\), then \({\cal A}_S{\cal A}_C=0\).
Let \({\cal K}\) be an MPO tensor of positive bond dimension \(D\) with a physical-sector factorization and sector weights \(p_k\), and let \(I_*=\{ k:p_k\ne 0\} \). Suppose that every neighboring operator \(\eta _{k,h}\) is positive semidefinite,
and, for every \(k\in I_*\), some virtual matrix \(A_{k;x,y}\) is nonzero. Suppose also that every nonzero \(\eta _{k,h}\) with \(k,h\in I_*\) admits \(j\in I_*\) such that \(\eta _{h,j}\ne 0\) and \(\eta _{j,k}\ne 0\), that the physical-trace transfer is literally idempotent,
that \(p_k=0\) implies that the left tensor of sector \(k\) vanishes, that the underlying tensor is normal in the sense of Definition 8.6.1, and that \(I_*\) is nonempty. Then
This is a project derivation completing the Case-I route toward [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, Lemma C.5, lines 1473–1499 ] ; it is not a statement of that source.
Suppose that the neighboring operators are positive semidefinite, the active one-site matrices span \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), each active sector contains a nonzero such matrix, and every nonzero edge closes through a third active sector. Then \((T^{*3})_{k,k}{\gt}0\) for every \(k\in I_*\). Together with the length-two returns and irreducibility, this implies that \(T^*\) is primitive.
Suppose that the active one-site matrices span \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) and each active sector contains a nonzero such matrix. For every \(k\in I_*\) there is an \(h\in I_*\) such that
If the neighboring operators are positive semidefinite, then \((T^{*2})_{k,k}{\gt}0\).
Suppose that the neighboring operators are positive semidefinite, the active one-site matrices span \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), and each active sector contains a nonzero such matrix. Then the non-negative matrix \(T^*\) is irreducible.
Let \({\cal K}\) be an MPO tensor with a physical-sector factorization and sector weights \(p_k\). Suppose that every neighboring operator is positive semidefinite, that the physical-trace transfer is literally idempotent,
as in [ CPGSV16 , Definition 4.2, lines 735–741 ] , and that the left tensor of every zero-weight sector vanishes. Then the active trace matrix stabilizes after the second power:
If, in addition, the active one-site matrices span \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), each active sector contains a nonzero such matrix, every nonzero neighboring operator closes through a third active sector, and there is at least one active sector, then \((T^*)^2\) is strictly positive entrywise.
These are matrix-algebra components of the Case-I argument under the assumptions of [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1374–1381 ] , for the factorization supplied by [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, Lemma C.4, lines 1406–1471 ] and the zero-correlation-length step of [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, Lemma C.5, lines 1473–1499 ] . They are project derivations, not statements of that source.
Let \({\cal K}\) be injective and satisfy SAL and the literal identity
Then \({\cal K}\) admits a physical-sector factorization, nonnegative weights of sum one, and positive semidefinite neighboring operators for which the active trace matrix \(T^*\) is primitive. For some \(\lambda {\gt}0\), the normalized matrix \(\widehat T^*=\lambda ^{-1}T^*\) satisfies \((\widehat T^*)^2=(\widehat T^*)^3\) and, for every positive integer \(N\),
No idempotence or rank-one conclusion is asserted.
If every neighboring operator is positive semidefinite, then \(T^*\) is entrywise non-negative and \(T^*_{k,h}{\gt}0\Longleftrightarrow \eta _{k,h}\ne 0\).
Let \({\cal K}\) be an MPO tensor of positive bond dimension \(D\) with a physical-sector factorization and sector weights \(p_k\), and let \(I_*=\{ k:p_k\ne 0\} \). Suppose that every neighboring operator \(\eta _{k,h}\) is positive semidefinite,
and, for every \(k\in I_*\), some virtual matrix \(A_{k;x,y}\) is nonzero. Suppose also that every nonzero \(\eta _{k,h}\) with \(k,h\in I_*\) admits \(j\in I_*\) such that \(\eta _{h,j}\ne 0\) and \(\eta _{j,k}\ne 0\), that the physical-trace transfer is literally idempotent,
that \(p_k=0\) implies that the left tensor of sector \(k\) vanishes, that the underlying tensor is normal in the sense of Definition 8.6.1, and that \(I_*\) is nonempty. Then
This is the Case-I input to the proof of Lemma C.5 ( [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1473–1499 ] ), not the lemma’s headline statement.
Let \({\cal K}\) be injective and suppose that it satisfies SAL and source zero correlation length. Then there are a physical-sector factorization, weights \(p_k\geq 0\) with \(\sum _k p_k=1\), and positive semidefinite neighboring operators \(\eta _{k,h}\) such that the active trace matrix
is primitive. There is also a real number \(\lambda {\gt}0\) for which, upon setting \(\widehat T^*:=\lambda ^{-1}T^*\), one has \((\widehat T^*)^2=(\widehat T^*)^3\). For every positive integer \(N\), \(\operatorname{tr}((\widehat T^*)^N)=\operatorname{tr}(\widehat T^*)\). Thus the primitivity and the two normalized identities concern the same active, positively rephased trace matrix. No idempotence, rank-one, or semisimplicity conclusion is asserted.
The tensor in Theorem 20.15.6.18 also admits a physical-sector factorization with one sector. Write each physical label as a pair \((x,y)\in \{ 0,1\} ^2\) and put \(Z=\operatorname {diag}(1,-1)\). The left and right factors are
Its sole neighboring operator is
In particular, \(\eta \) is positive semidefinite and \(\operatorname{tr}(\eta )=1\). Taking \(a=b=1\) gives the normalized rank-one trace factorization. Thus the four sectors selected by the inverse-map construction are nonminimal; their non-rank-one trace matrix is not an obstruction to the existence of another physical-sector factorization for this tensor.
- MPOTensor.ActiveSectorSpanningCounterexample.oneSectorEquiv
- MPOTensor.ActiveSectorSpanningCounterexample.oneSectorSign
- MPOTensor.ActiveSectorSpanningCounterexample.oneSectorLeftTensor
- MPOTensor.ActiveSectorSpanningCounterexample.oneSectorRightTensor
- MPOTensor.ActiveSectorSpanningCounterexample.oneSectorLeftTensor_apply
- MPOTensor.ActiveSectorSpanningCounterexample.oneSectorRightTensor_apply
- MPOTensor.ActiveSectorSpanningCounterexample.oneSectorFactorization
- MPOTensor.ActiveSectorSpanningCounterexample.oneSector_neighboringOperator_eq
- MPOTensor.ActiveSectorSpanningCounterexample.oneSector_neighboringOperator_posSemidef
- MPOTensor.ActiveSectorSpanningCounterexample.oneSector_neighboringOperator_trace
- MPOTensor.ActiveSectorSpanningCounterexample.oneSectorNeighboringTraceFactorization
- MPOTensor.ActiveSectorSpanningCounterexample.exists_oneSector_neighboringTraceFactorization
Suppose that the periodic operators are positive semidefinite and have nonzero trace at every positive chain length. For every \(N\) and every \(1\leq m\leq \lfloor N/2\rfloor \), divide the chain into four consecutive regions of lengths \(m-1,1,N-m-1,1\). If the marginal on the first three regions admits a quantum Markov decomposition on its one-site middle system, then the tensor saturates the area law.
Let \(K\) be injective and admit a physical-sector factorization with positive semidefinite neighboring operators. If an orthogonal projection \(P\) satisfies
for every \(\beta ,\alpha \), then there is a positive two-site operator \(B\) whose periodic translates commute and such that
Applied to pairwise orthogonal projections \(P_s\), this construction gives an orthogonal family of positive commuting sector bonds for the tensors \(K_s\).
Let \(\varphi :\{ 0,\ldots ,d^2-1\} \to \{ 0,\ldots ,d-1\} ^2\) be the canonical bijection. Then \((K^{[2]})^{i,j} =(K^{[L]})^{\varphi (i),\varphi (j)}\bigm |_{L=2}\). Consequently, for every nonempty chain length \(N\), the closed MPO of \(K^{[2]}\) is obtained from the closed MPO of the general length-two block by applying \(\varphi \) independently at every ket and bra site. In particular, if \(K\) generates matrix product density operators, then so does \(K^{[2]}\).
Let \(K\) be an MPO tensor. Suppose that trace-preserving completely positive maps \(S_{24}\) and \(T_{24}\) satisfy the following identities for every virtual matrix \(X\):
Then the two-site physical blocking \(K^{[2]}\) is a renormalization fixed point.
Let \(F\) be a physical-sector factorization of \(\mathcal K\) whose neighboring operators satisfy Definition 20.15.3.32. Thus they are positive semidefinite and there are real families \((a_k)_k,(b_k)_k\) with \(\operatorname{tr}(\eta _{k,h})=a_kb_h\) and \(\sum _k a_kb_k=1\). Let \(\mathcal K^{[2]}\) be the tensor obtained by blocking two adjacent sites of \(\mathcal K\). Then \(\mathcal K^{[2]}\) is a renormalization fixed point in the sense of Definition 20.2.1. This is the conditional channel construction of [ CPGSV16 , Proposition C.7 ] for one supplied factorization. It does not extend to the printed all-BNT implication [ CPGSV16 , Theorem 4.9, (iv)\(\Rightarrow \)(v) ] : condition (iv) constrains each BNT representative but not its raw repeated-copy weights, and that implication is refuted by Theorem 20.15.8.23. After condition (ii) has forced equal copy weights and their common values have been absorbed, these one-factorization channels become inputs to the projector-controlled assembly used by the viable implication (ii)\(\Rightarrow \)(v).
Assume that every blocked BNT label has positive multiplicity and that the blocked vertical tensor has the exact coisometric reconstruction \(T=U_2^\dagger C_2U_2\). Let \(E_{\gamma ,0}\) be the canonical inclusion of the first copy of label \(\gamma \), and put \(F_\gamma =U_2^\dagger E_{\gamma ,0}\). Then \(F_\gamma \) is an isometry, intertwines \(T\) with the distinguished weighted BNT copy in both directions, and compresses \(T\) to that copy exactly. For an active product corner covered by \(\gamma \), transport \(F_\gamma \) along the stated equality of bond dimensions. The transported map remains an isometry and obeys the corresponding transported compression identity.
- MPOTensor.blockedReferenceInclusion
- MPOTensor.blockedReferenceInclusion_isometry
- MPOTensor.blockedReference_intertwine
- MPOTensor.blockedReference_intertwine_adjoint
- MPOTensor.blockedReference_compression
- MPOTensor.RetainedProductSpectralFamily.FlatBlockedBNTComparison.referenceInclusion
- MPOTensor.RetainedProductSpectralFamily.FlatBlockedBNTComparison.referenceInclusion_isometry
- MPOTensor.RetainedProductSpectralFamily.FlatBlockedBNTComparison.reference_compression
Fix one-site and two-site vertical canonical decompositions whose sectors are identified by the transported unitary relabelling. Suppose that the product tensors have positive diagonal fusion matrices \(\chi _{\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma }\) and exact forward and reverse coisometric fusion identities. If the blocked operator has the two simultaneous representations of Theorem 20.14.82, then
This is the idempotent coefficient identity in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.4, lines 2030–2042 ] .
Let \(F\) be a physical-sector factorization whose neighboring operators satisfy Definition 20.15.3.32. Let \(\widehat{\mathcal K}^{[2]}\) be the tensor obtained by blocking two adjacent sites of its sector-coordinate tensor \(\widehat{\mathcal K}\). Then \(\widehat{\mathcal K}^{[2]}\) is a renormalization fixed point in the sense of Definition 20.2.1. More precisely, after the canonical identifications of one blocked site with two original sites and two blocked sites with four original sites, the required channels are \(\widehat{\mathcal S}^2\) and \(\widehat{\mathcal T}^2\).
Under the hypotheses and with the sector correspondence of Theorem 20.14.81, let \(B\) be the vertical reading of the two-site blocking, and write \(O_L(A)=\operatorname{Tr}_{\mathrm{bond}}(A_{i_1}\cdots A_{i_L})\) for the length-\(L\) closed-chain operator. If \(L{\gt}0\), then the same equivalence \(\sigma \), dimension identifications, and unitaries appearing in the tensor-letter identity satisfy
These are the two representations in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.4, lines 2011–2018 ] .
Local fix (blocked coefficient exponent): CPSV16 Appendix C.4, line 2013 prints \(m_\gamma ^L/n_\gamma \). The line-2008 tensor scaling and line 2040 give \((m_\gamma /n_\gamma )^L\). This is documented in [ con26x ] .
- MPOTensor.transportedVerticalSector_exists_blockedOperatorRepresentations
- MPOTensor.verticalBNTMPO_verticalTensor_blockTwo
- MPOTensor.mpo_verticalBNTMPO_verticalAssembledTensor_eq_sum
- MPOTensor.mpo_verticalBNTMPO_eq_sum_of_coisometry_reconstruction
- MPOTensor.mpo_verticalBNTMPO_eq_pow_smul_of_unitary_reindex
- MPOTensor.blockedVerticalOperatorRepresentations_of_unitaryBlockEquiv
For every integer \(L\geq 0\), pairing the ket and bra letters site by site gives the canonical identification
Under this identification, the doubled-index MPS tensor of \(M^{[L]}\) is the physical reindexing of the \(L\)-blocked doubled-index MPS tensor of \(M\). In particular, one is injective if and only if the other is.
For every integer \(L\geq 0\) and two MPO tensors \(M,N\) with the same physical dimension, let juxtaposition denote the MPO tensor product obtained by contracting the intermediate physical index. Then \((MN)^{[L]}=M^{[L]}N^{[L]}\). For \(L=0\), each blocked tensor is the unique empty-word local matrix, namely the identity, so the equality reduces to the product of two identity local tensors.
Let \(\{ \mathcal K_x\} _{x=0}^{g-1}\) be injective MPO tensors, each of which generates positive semidefinite periodic operators at every positive length. If, for every pair \(x\ne y\), the unstarred identities
hold for all virtual indices, then there are pairwise orthogonal projections \(P_x\in M_d(\mathbb {C})\) such that
for every \(x,\beta ,\alpha \). Conversely, any pairwise annihilating family with these two-sided support identities satisfies the unstarred layer identities.
- MPOTensor.physicalSliceColumns
- MPOTensor.physicalSupportProj
- MPOTensor.physicalSupportProj_mul_physicalSlice
- MPOTensor.physicalSlice_mul_physicalSupportProj_of_isInjective_isMPDO
- MPOTensor.physicalSliceColumns_conjTranspose_mul_eq_zero
- MPOTensor.exists_pairwise_orthogonal_twoSided_physicalSupport
- MPOTensor.isBNTLayerOrthogonal_of_pairwise_orthogonal_twoSided_support
There is a two-label family of bond-dimension-one MPO tensors for which the unstarred layer identities hold, but no pairwise orthogonal one-site projections support both tensors on both sides. One may take both labels to have the single physical slice
- MPOTensor.BNTLayerOrthogonalityCounterexample.squareZeroPhysicalMatrix_ne_zero
- MPOTensor.BNTLayerOrthogonalityCounterexample.squareZeroPhysicalMatrix_mul_self
- MPOTensor.BNTLayerOrthogonalityCounterexample.family_isBNTLayerOrthogonal
- MPOTensor.BNTLayerOrthogonalityCounterexample.no_pairwise_orthogonal_twoSided_support
Let \(x=(s,\alpha _1,\beta _1)\) and \(y=(t,\alpha _3,\beta _3)\). Comparing the two expressions for the same outer inverse contraction gives
Here \(\kappa ^{(s)}_{\beta _1,\alpha _3}(i,j) ={(\mathcal K_s^{ij})}_{\beta _1,\alpha _3}\). Thus both the normal-sector and Markov-sector off-diagonal entries are retained in the statement, rather than being suppressed by a prior choice of equal labels. This is the full entrywise identity used in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1719–1732 ] .
The closing entry \({(R_s)}_{\beta _3,\alpha _1}\) is the corrected tail-index orientation of the display at lines 1422–1438, recorded in [ con26t ] .
If \(p_k\ne 0\), then there is a normal sector \(s\) for which \(O_s^{(k)}\ne 0\).
This is the existence part of equation QkKjs in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1733–1737 ] . Restricting to \(p_k\ne 0\) is the literal version of the source’s preceding removal of summands for which \(Q_k\sigma _3^{(N)}Q_k=0\).
Suppose, in addition, that every closing matrix \(R_s\) is nonzero. If \(p_k\ne 0\), there is a unique normal sector \(j_k\) for which \(O_{j_k}^{(k)}\ne 0\).
This is the cancellation argument in equation QkKjs. The stated nonzero-closing-matrix condition isolates the step obtained in the source from simplicity and the common-weight choice at [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1714–1718 ] . Its derivation from those preceding hypotheses is Theorem 20.15.1.14.
Fix a normal sector \(s\) and virtual indices \(\alpha _1,\beta _3\) for which \({(R_s)}_{\beta _3,\alpha _1}\ne 0\). Then, for every \(\beta _1,\alpha _3\) and every pair of distinct Markov sectors \(k\ne k'\), one has
Thus each physical slice of the \(s\)-th normal tensor is block diagonal in the Markov decomposition. This is equation Qks in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1682–1688 and 1730–1735 ] .
The nonzero closing entry uses the corrected orientation \({(R_s)}_{\beta _3,\alpha _1}\) recorded in [ con26t ] .
Let \(\Gamma _{x,y}\) denote the outer inverse contraction. In the basis of the chosen Hayashi decomposition,
In particular, the probability \(p_k\) remains explicit. This identity requires neither a nonvanishing condition on \(p_k\) nor assumptions of saturated area law or zero correlation length.
Let \(M\) generate positive semidefinite periodic operators and have a BNT decomposition with representatives \(A_x\) of positive bond dimension, copy numbers \(n_x\geq 1\), and arbitrary copy weights \(\mu _{x,q}\). Suppose that the decomposition generates the same matrix product vectors as \(M\) at every positive length. Assume that the simultaneous one-site tuples \((A_x^i)_x\), as \(i\) ranges over the physical labels, span the product of the virtual matrix algebras. Assume also that, for distinct \(x,y\),
for all virtual indices. For every \(x\), suppose that \(A_x\) has the physical-sector factorization
with positive neighboring operators \(\eta ^x_{k,h}\) and real numbers \(a^x_k,b^x_k\) satisfying
Then the matrix product density operators generated by \(M\) have the GSNNCH form, with the BNT copy numbers \(n_x\) as their outer multiplicities. No equality among the copy weights is assumed.
- MPOTensor.changePhysicalBasis_eq_ite_of_pairwise_orthogonal_twoSided_physicalSupport
- MPOTensor.singleKrausMap_sitewise_eq_coefficient_smul_of_orthogonalSupport
- MPOTensor.exists_nonnegative_sectorCoefficient_of_orthogonalSupport
- MPOTensor.exists_nonnegative_real_eq_sectorCoefficient_of_orthogonalSupport
- MPOTensor.hasGSNNCHForm_of_bntLayerOrthogonal_of_physicalSectorFactorization
Suppose that the source BNT projectors have been constructed after the common physical blocking, and let \(\mathcal K_s\) be the normal representative with its common copy weight absorbed. Then \(\mathcal K_s\) admits a physical support restriction to the range of \(P_s\). In particular, for some isometry \(V_s\),
and the restricted tensor \(V_s^*\mathcal K_sV_s\) is injective.
Under the hypotheses of Theorem 20.15.2.21, the resulting projectors satisfy \(P_sA_iP_t=0\) whenever \(s\ne t\) or \(i\ne s\). For the matching label, they satisfy \(P_iA_iP_i=A_i\). Consequently, \(\sum _sP_sA_iP_s=A_i\), which is the local diagonal decomposition required for the sector entropy argument. Equivalently, compressing the physical legs of \(A_i\) by \(P_s\) retains \(A_i\) for \(s=i\) and gives the zero local tensor otherwise. This is the local projection relation in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1680–1755 ] .
The Markov summands of zero Hayashi weight are retained in the ambient decomposition. They annihilate every normal-sector physical slice, so the displayed local identities do not require the stronger assertion \(\sum _sP_s=\mathbb {1}\) outside the active support.
For every nonempty periodic chain and every normal-sector label \(s\),
This is equation sigmaNKj in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1756–1759 ] .
Here and throughout the MPDO discussion, a periodic chain has positive length.
Every \(P_s\) is an orthogonal projection, distinct \(P_s\) are mutually orthogonal, and \(\sum _s P_s=P_{\mathrm{act}}\).
Suppose that the BNT physical projectors \(P_x\) have been selected and that every common-weight-absorbed representative \(\mathcal K_x\) satisfies SAL. Then there are positive two-site bonds \(B^{(x)}\) such that the projections \(P_x\) are pairwise orthogonal,
all cyclic translates of each \(B^{(x)}\) commute pairwise, and, for every \(N\geq 2\),
Thus the absorbed BNT representatives have an orthogonally supported family of commuting sector products with normalization scalar one.
Let \(x=(s,\alpha _1,\beta _1)\) and \(y=(t,\alpha _3,\beta _3)\). For a three-site family closure and a simultaneous left inverse, the outer inverse contraction vanishes when \(s\ne t\). When \(s=t\), it is \((\mathcal K_s^{i_2j_2})_{\beta _1,\alpha _3} (R_s)_{\beta _3,\alpha _1}\). In particular, the contraction retains precisely one entry of the middle physical slice and one entry of the closing matrix, with the orientation shown above. This is the sector-family form of the Case I contraction in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1415–1438 ] . The basis-of-normal-tensors inverse is constructed at lines 1666–1676 and the resulting contraction is used in the Case II calculation at lines 1719–1732 of the same appendix. The closing entry \(R_s(\beta _3,\alpha _1)\) is the corrected tail-index orientation of the display at lines 1422–1438, recorded in [ con26t ] .
Let \(K\) be an MPO tensor of virtual bond dimension one. If \(K\) satisfies the strong area law and literal zero correlation length, then there is a physical-sector factorization of \(K\) whose neighboring operator is positive semidefinite and whose trace has the normalized rank-one form
The factors are normalized by
- MPOTensor.BondOnePhysicalSectorFactorization.sectorEquiv
- MPOTensor.BondOnePhysicalSectorFactorization.factorization
- MPOTensor.BondOnePhysicalSectorFactorization.physTraceTransfer_eq_one
- MPOTensor.BondOnePhysicalSectorFactorization.neighboringOperator_eq_submatrix
- MPOTensor.BondOnePhysicalSectorFactorization.neighboringOperator_pos
- MPOTensor.BondOnePhysicalSectorFactorization.neighboringOperator_trace
- MPOTensor.BondOnePhysicalSectorFactorization.neighboringTraceFactorization
- MPOTensor.exists_physicalSectorFactorization_of_bondDim_one
Let a tensor be gauge equivalent, by an invertible virtual matrix \(G\), to a finite block sum with component tensors \(A_s\) and weights \(\mu _s\). For an arbitrary virtual boundary \(X\) and an arbitrary word \(w\), its closure is the sum of the component closures with boundaries given by the diagonal blocks of \(G^{-1}XG\):
The conjugated boundary \(G^{-1}XG\) is independent of the word length. This is the arbitrary-boundary form of the block calculation used in [ CPGSV16 , lines 186–195 and Appendix C.2, lines 1646–1665 and 1810–1825 ] .
Let \(S\) be a nonempty sector decomposition with representatives \(A_x\), positive copy numbers \(n_x\), and nonzero copy weights. Suppose its total bond dimension equals that of an MPO tensor \(M\), and a block-diagonal gauge reconstructs \(M\) from the tensor associated with \(S\). Suppose also that this tensor has the same matrix product vectors as \(M\) at every positive length, that all copy weights over \(A_x\) have a common value \(\mu _x\), and that the physical-trace transfer of every \(A_x\) is nonnilpotent. Assume that the one-letter tuples \((A_x^i)_x\) span the full product of the representative matrix algebras, and put \(K_x=\mu _xA_x\).
Suppose that the tensors \(K_x\) form a proportionally realized orthogonal commuting sector family and that each one-site operator \(\rho ^{(1)}(K_x)\) is positive semidefinite. If \(M\) has source zero correlation length, then \(M\) satisfies SAL.
This is [ CPGSV16 , Proposition C.14 ] with the ambient zero-correlation-length and one-site positivity hypotheses made explicit: the printed proposition omits the ambient hypothesis that its proof uses, through Proposition C.9, to obtain sectorwise zero correlation length, and its commuting-bond realization is unambiguous only from length two onward, so positivity of \(\rho ^{(1)}(K_x)\) is the sharp additional boundary.
Let \({\cal K}\) be an injective normal MPO tensor satisfying the strong area law and literal physical-trace idempotence,
Then there is a physical-sector factorization with nonnegative weights \((p_k)_k\) satisfying \(\sum _k p_k=1\), positive semidefinite neighboring operators \(\eta _{k,h}\), and real families \((a_k)_k,(b_k)_k\) indexed by all sector labels. For all \(k,h\),
On the nonzero-weight sectors these are the coefficient families of Theorem 20.15.6.39; if \(p_k=0\), then \(a_k=b_k=0\). This is a project-derived realization of the all-index coefficient statement in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, Lemma C.5, lines 1473–1499 ] . The source does not introduce the active–inactive split or ambient filler sectors used here. This theorem concerns literal zero correlation length only; it makes no assertion for the scale-invariant source-ZCL condition or in Case II.
Under the complete normal Case-I hypotheses of Theorem 20.15.6.35, there are real functions \(a,b:I_*\to \mathbb R\) such that, for all \(k,h\in I_*\),
and
This is the normal Case-I active-sector packaging of the displayed rank-one and normalization equations in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1394–1401 and 1484–1499 ] . It neither transfers a conclusion to Case II nor uses the paper’s constant-trace-powers rank-one argument.
Let \({\cal K}\) be an injective MPO tensor. Suppose that \({\cal K}\) satisfies the strong area law, that its physical-trace transfer is literally idempotent,
and that the underlying tensor is normal in the sense of Definition 8.6.1. Then there is a physical-sector factorization with sector weights \(p_k\geq 0\) satisfying \(\sum _kp_k=1\), for which every neighboring operator is positive semidefinite. There are real functions \(a,b\) on \(I_*=\{ k:p_k\ne 0\} \). For all \(k,h\in I_*\),
and
This is the active-sector part of the normal Case-I conclusion of [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, Case I, lines 1374–1381 ] . The active Hayashi factorization comes from [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, Lemma C.4, lines 1406–1471 ] ; Theorem 20.15.6.40 extends these coefficients to every sector label, as in Lemma C.5.
Under the hypotheses of Theorem 20.15.6.35, define the rectangular trace-pairing matrices
Then
This is a project-derived rectangular form, in project notation, of the \(l_h,r_k\) factors from [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, Lemma C.5, lines 1473–1499 ] ; the source does not state it as a separate displayed theorem.
Let \({\cal K}\) be an injective MPO tensor satisfying the strong area law. Suppose that its physical-trace transfer is literally idempotent and that its underlying tensor is normal. Then one can choose a single coherently rephased, zero-weight-reparameterized inverse-map factorization with nonnegative weights \((p_k)_k\) satisfying \(\sum _kp_k=1\), positive semidefinite neighboring operators \(\eta _{k,h}\), and real functions \(a,b\) on \(I_*=\{ k:p_k\ne 0\} \). For all \(k,h\in I_*\),
and
For all ambient sector labels \(k,h\),
The incident-vanishing clause belongs to this chosen reparameterized and rephased factorization, not to the raw inverse-map factors. This is the normal Case-I construction from [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, Case I, Lemmas C.4–C.5, lines 1374–1505 ] ; the incident-vanishing clause is the chosen zero-weight convention for inactive summands.
Let \(A_0,A_1\) be the bond-one tensors whose only nonzero doubled-physical entries are
With \((\mu _0,\mu _1)=(1/\sqrt2,1)\), they are normal and form a normalized BNT canonical decomposition. Their simultaneous word-tuple span is the full two-block direct sum already at length one, so the representative family is in biCF. The ambient tensor is
both entrywise and as a doubled-index MPS tensor, and is in normalized BNT-refined horizontal form. Moreover, the doubled physical-trace transfer of neither representative is nilpotent.
Each representative occurs in exactly one copy. Thus independence of the weight from the copy label is vacuous within each representative and does not compare the two representatives or their displayed weights.
- MPOTensor.CaseIIAbsorptionCounterexample.basis_isNormalTensor
- MPOTensor.CaseIIAbsorptionCounterexample.sectors_isBNTCanonicalForm
- MPOTensor.CaseIIAbsorptionCounterexample.sectors_wordTupleSpanTop_one
- MPOTensor.CaseIIAbsorptionCounterexample.sectors_hasBiCF
- MPOTensor.CaseIIAbsorptionCounterexample.ambient_eq_weighted_basis_blocks
- MPOTensor.CaseIIAbsorptionCounterexample.ambient_toMPSTensor_eq_sectors_toTensor
- MPOTensor.CaseIIAbsorptionCounterexample.ambient_isHorizontalCF
- MPOTensor.CaseIIAbsorptionCounterexample.sectors_basis_doubledPhysTraceTransfer_not_isNilpotent
Let \(A_0\) have scalar entries \(1/\sqrt2\) on doubled symbols \((0,0)\) and \((1,1)\), let \(A_1\) have scalar entry \(1\) only on \((2,2)\), and take \((\mu _0,\mu _1)=(1/\sqrt2,1)\). Their weighted bond-diagonal assembly has
For every \(N{\gt}0\) and physical strings \(\sigma ,\tau \in \{ 0,1,2\} ^N\),
Hence \(K\) generates positive semidefinite operators. It satisfies the strong area law and the literal zero-correlation-length equation
Its displayed BNT decomposition has the global unit-weight convention, its representatives form a biCF family, and \(K\) has simple canonical form at this normalized fixed representative. Nevertheless,
Copy-weight independence is only within the single copy of each representative; it does not equate \(\mu _0\) and \(\mu _1\). Thus all conditions used in the Case-II passage are present, but the printed absorbed-normality inference is false [ CPGSV16 , lines 1628–1665 and 1740–1782 ] . This does not refute the asserted all-sector conclusion or Theorem 4.9.
- MPOTensor.CaseIIAbsorptionCounterexample.ambient_isMPDO
- MPOTensor.CaseIIAbsorptionCounterexample.trace_mpo_ambient
- MPOTensor.CaseIIAbsorptionCounterexample.trace_mpo_ambient_pos
- MPOTensor.CaseIIAbsorptionCounterexample.ambient_isSAL
- MPOTensor.CaseIIAbsorptionCounterexample.ambient_isSimpleCanonicalForm
- MPOTensor.CaseIIAbsorptionCounterexample.ambient_isSAL_isSimpleCanonicalForm_and_firstAbsorbed_not_isNormalTensor
- MPOTensor.CaseIIAbsorptionCounterexample.printed_absorbed_normality_step_is_false
Let \(L\in \mathbb {N}\), and let
concatenate the \(N\) blocked words. For blocked configurations \(\sigma \) and \(\tau \),
The algebraic identity holds for every \(L\in \mathbb {N}\). For \(L\geq 1\), positivity of the original nonempty chain of length \(NL\) shows that blocking \(L\) adjacent physical sites of an MPDO again gives an MPDO. This is the closed-chain identification implicit when the one-site tensor and its two-site blocking are placed in vertical canonical form in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.4, lines 1952–2017 ] .
Let \({\cal K}\) be injective. Let \(R\) and \(\rho \) give a three-site closure of \({\cal K}\), choose a Hayashi decomposition of \(\rho \), and fix virtual indices \(\alpha _1,\beta _3\) such that \(R_{\beta _3,\alpha _1}\ne 0\). Form the corresponding closed sector tensors \(|l_k)\) and \((r_k|\). If \({\cal K}\) satisfies the positive-real up-to-scalar physical-trace relation, set \(S:=\sum _k |l_k)(r_k|\). Then there is a real number \(\lambda {\gt}0\) such that
If \({\cal K}\) satisfies the paper’s literal source zero-correlation-length identity \(\mathcal T_{\cal K}^2=\mathcal T_{\cal K}\), then the raw pairing operator itself satisfies \(S^2=S\). This is the display preceding [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, Lemma C.5 ] . The first identity records the broader relation used in this development, which is invariant under positive real rescaling; the paper’s identity is its \(\lambda =1\) specialization.
More generally, any sector factorization \(U_B\kappa _{\beta ,\alpha }U_B^\dagger =\bigoplus _k(l_k)_\beta \otimes (r_k)_\alpha \) gives the closed-sector pairing operator
This identifies the transfer matrix of Definition 20.5.1 with the operator on the left-hand side of the zero-correlation-length identity in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1489–1493 ] .
Under the hypotheses of Theorem 20.15.4.7, suppose that \({\cal K}\) satisfies the positive-real up-to-scalar physical-trace relation. There is a real number \(\lambda {\gt}0\) such that, for \(\widehat T:=\lambda ^{-1}T\), one has
For every positive integer \(N\), one also has
For the literal \(\lambda =1\) source zero-correlation-length identity, this specializes to the trace-power display in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1490–1497 ] . No idempotence or rank-one conclusion for \(\widehat T\) is asserted.
Let \(\mathcal K\) be injective and let \(\rho \) be its three-site closure against \(R\). Applying the inverse tensor at the two outer sites collapses the closure to one entry of the middle physical slice and one entry of the tail:
Consequently, for any matrix \(U\) on the middle site,
Suppose the weights over each representative are independent of the copy index, and none of the physical-trace transfers \(\mathcal B_j=\sum _i A_j^{ii}\) is nilpotent. There is one positive tail length \(L\) such that, for every representative \(A_j\), some virtual indices \(\alpha ,\beta \) satisfy \(\widetilde m_j=[\mathcal B_j^L]_{\alpha ,\beta }\ne 0\). At total chain length \(L+3\), the corresponding copy coefficient is \(q_j=\sum _q\mu _{j,q}^{L+3}\ne 0\). Thus the three-site closing matrix satisfies
This is the traced-tail selection made in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1714–1718 ] .
After absorbing the common weight, the matrix product vector of the assembled tensor is
This is equation CFK of [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1660–1665 ] ; the same multiplicities occur in equation sigmaNKj of [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1756–1759 ] .
Let \(r_j\) be the number of horizontal copies of representative \(j\). Then its coefficient on a chain of length \(N\) is
Thus the natural multiplicity is the horizontal copy count \(r_j\).
The common weight is nonzero, and hence for every chain length \(N\),
This is the coefficient nonvanishing used in the choice \(m_j=q_j\widetilde m_j\) in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1714–1718 ] . It does not assert nonvanishing of the independent virtual tail contraction \(\widetilde m_j\).
Let \(B\) be a pair-indexed positive bond whose periodic translates commute. There are a unitary coordinate decomposition \(H\cong \bigoplus _q H_{q,r}\otimes H_{q,l}\) and positive semidefinite operators \(\eta _{q,h}\) on \(H_{q,r}\otimes H_{h,l}\). After regrouping the two-site coordinates, the \((q,h)\)-sector is \(H_{q,l}\otimes (H_{q,r}\otimes H_{h,l})\otimes H_{h,r}\), and in these regrouped coordinates
The unitary and the neighboring operators depend only on the fixed bond, and hence are independent of a chain length or bond position.
A single positive commuting bond is the one-sector instance of the explicit GSNNCH decomposition, with sector projection equal to the identity and multiplicity one.
There is an injective normal tensor \(\mathcal K\), of physical dimension two and bond dimension one, which generates MPDOs and has source zero correlation length, together with one positive two-site bond \(B\) whose translates commute. For every \(N\geq 2\),
while the trace matrix of a chosen two-sector Beigi factorization is
In particular, \(T\) is not primitive.
This shows that primitivity cannot be inferred for an arbitrary selected factorization in the step suggested at [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, line 1613 ] . The same tensor also has a one-sector factorization with positive semidefinite neighboring operator and primitive trace matrix. Hence the example does not exclude a source-faithful minimal or visible-sector selection, and it does not disprove the stated commuting-form-to-SAL implication.
If \(X_{k,h}\) is the \((k,h)\) diagonal block of \(X\), then
For every pair \((k,h)\), the operator \(\overline\eta _{k,h}\) is positive semidefinite with trace one. Hence \(\overline{\mathcal S}_{k,h}\) is trace-preserving and completely positive. If \(a_kb_h\ne 0\), then both the density matrix and the preparation equal their normalized active forms.
- MPOTensor.ExplicitEtaOperators.completedEta_pos
- MPOTensor.ExplicitEtaOperators.trace_completedEta
- MPOTensor.ExplicitEtaOperators.completedEta_eq_normalizedEta
- MPOTensor.ExplicitEtaOperators.completedEta_preparationMap_isKrausCPTP
- MPOTensor.ExplicitEtaOperators.completedEtaPreparationMap_eq_normalized
If \(X_{k,h}\) is the \((k,h)\) diagonal block of \(X\), then
For every pair \((k,h)\), the operator \(\overline\Omega _{k,h}\) is positive semidefinite with trace one. Hence \(\overline{\mathcal T}_{k,h}\) is trace-preserving and completely positive. On every active pair it equals the normalized active preparation.
- MPOTensor.ExplicitEtaOperators.completedOmega_pos
- MPOTensor.ExplicitEtaOperators.trace_completedOmega
- MPOTensor.ExplicitEtaOperators.completedOmega_eq_normalizedOmega
- MPOTensor.ExplicitEtaOperators.completedOmega_preparationMap_isKrausCPTP
- MPOTensor.ExplicitEtaOperators.completedOmegaPreparationMap_eq_normalized
For every matrix \(U\) on the physical space and every \(N\ge 1\),
In particular \(\rho ^{(N)}(\widetilde{\cal K})\ge 0\) whenever \(\rho ^{(N)}({\cal K})\ge 0\).
Let \(P\) be a BNT sector presentation of \(A\) and let \(c\in \mathbb C\setminus \{ 0\} \). Multiplying every copy weight of \(P\) by \(c\) gives a BNT sector presentation of \(cA\) with the same representatives and multiplicities.
- MPSTensor.IsBNTSectorPresentation.smul_left
- MPSTensor.SectorDecomposition.scaleWeights
- MPSTensor.SectorDecomposition.scaleWeights_basisCount
- MPSTensor.SectorDecomposition.scaleWeights_basisDim
- MPSTensor.SectorDecomposition.scaleWeights_basis
- MPSTensor.SectorDecomposition.scaleWeights_copies
- MPSTensor.SectorDecomposition.scaleWeights_weight
- MPSTensor.SectorDecomposition.scaleWeights_toTensor
Let \(N\geq 1\) and let \(k=(k_0,\ldots ,k_{N-1})\) be a cyclic sector configuration. If \(k_n\notin C\) for some \(n\), then \(\Omega _k=0\). Thus deleting the sectors outside \(C\) leaves every finite cyclic neighboring product unchanged. For every linear contraction \(\Phi \), including a composition of reindexings and partial traces, \(\Omega _k=0\) implies \(\Phi (\Omega _k)=0\).
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.isCyclicActiveSector_of_cyclic_edges
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.neighboringOperator_ne_zero_of_cyclicNeighboringProduct_ne_zero
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.isCyclicActiveSector_of_cyclicNeighboringProduct_ne_zero
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.cyclicNeighboringProduct_eq_zero_of_not_isCyclicActiveSector
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.cyclicNeighboringProduct_eq_zero_of_not_forall_isCyclicActiveSector
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.map_cyclicNeighboringProduct_eq_zero_of_not_forall_isCyclicActiveSector
Let \(F\) be a physical-sector factorization with positive semidefinite neighboring operators. Suppose that \(\lambda {\gt}0\) and that functions \(a,b\) on the cyclic-active sectors satisfy
For every \(n\geq 0\), reindex the \((n+1)\)-site reduced state obtained from the periodic chain of length \(n+4\) by its retained open-edge coordinates. The result is the inverse trace of the length-\((n+4)\) periodic operator times the direct sum over retained sector words. A word outside cyclic support contributes zero; every cyclic-active word contributes its unchanged interior neighboring product tensored with the separated boundary factors determined by \(\lambda ,a,b\).
Let \(\mathcal K\) be injective and have source zero correlation length, and suppose its neighboring operators are positive semidefinite. There are \(\lambda {\gt}0\) and strictly positive functions \(a,b\) on the cyclic-active sectors, normalized by \(a\mathbin {\boldsymbol \cdot }b=1\), such that every fourth-region marginal is a direct sum over retained sector words of the unchanged interior neighboring product tensored with the separated left and right boundary factors determined by \(a\) and \(b\).
Under the hypotheses of Theorem 20.16.54, for arbitrary \(A,C\geq 0\), the fourth-region marginal on consecutive regions of lengths \(A\), \(1\), and \(C\) admits a Hayashi Markov decomposition. The middle site decomposes as the direct sum of its left and right sector factors. Each block is the tensor product of normalized positive left and right path states, and its probability is the product of their unnormalized traces divided by the positive periodic normalization.
Let \(F\) be a positive-dimensional physical-sector factorization whose neighboring operators are positive semidefinite. Fix \(A,C\geq 0\), \(\lambda \in \mathbb R\), and strictly positive functions \(a,b\) on the cyclic-active sectors. Suppose that the length-\((A+C+4)\) periodic operator has positive trace, the length-\((A+C+2)\) periodic operator has nonzero trace, and the normalized \((A+C+1)\)-site reduced state at length \(A+C+2\) has the explicit fourth-region block formula determined by \(\lambda ,a,b\). Then its tripartite form on regions of lengths \(A\), \(1\), and \(C\) admits a Hayashi Markov decomposition.
Let \(F\) be a physical-sector factorization whose neighboring operators are positive semidefinite, and let \(T_C\) be the trace matrix on its cyclic-active sectors. Assume that every ordered pair of cyclic-active sectors is joined by a path of nonzero neighboring operators. Assume also that, for every \(L{\gt}0\), the normalized \(L\)-site marginals obtained from chain lengths \(L+2\) and \(L+1\) are equal, and that the closed operator has a positive real trace \(Z_N\) at every length \(N\geq 2\). Then there is a number \(\lambda {\gt}0\) such that
Let \(F\) be a physical-sector factorization whose neighboring operators are positive semidefinite, and let \(T_C\) be the trace matrix on its cyclic-active sectors. Assume that every ordered pair of cyclic-active sectors is joined by a path of nonzero neighboring operators. Assume also that, for every \(L{\gt}0\), the normalized \(L\)-site marginals obtained from chain lengths \(L+2\) and \(L+1\) are equal, and that the closed operator has a positive real trace at every length \(N\geq 2\). Then \((T_C^2)_{q,h}{\gt}0\) for every pair of cyclic-active sectors \(q,h\).
Let \(C\) be the set of cyclic-active sectors and suppose that every neighboring operator is positive semidefinite. For \(q,h\in C\),
More generally, if \(B_{q,h}(X)\) denotes the outer boundary operator in the three-site closure, then
Here \(\operatorname{tr}_{\mathrm{mid}}\) traces both neighboring factors. No equality between \(T_C\) and \(T_C^2\) is asserted.
For every \(\lambda \in \mathbb {R}\), set \(\widehat T_C=\lambda ^{-1}T_C\). The same calculation with each fully traced edge multiplied by \(\lambda ^{-1}\) gives
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.sum_cyclicActive_trace_mul_trace_eq_pow_two
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.neighboringOperator_trace_eq_cyclicActiveSectorTraceMatrix
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.sum_cyclicActive_normalized_trace_mul_trace_eq_pow_two
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.sum_cyclicActive_partialTraceRight_threeSiteSectorClosure
Suppose that the virtual dimension is positive, the MPO tensor is injective, and every \(\eta _{k,h}\) is positive semidefinite. Then \(C\) is nonempty and the matrix \(T\) is primitive. More precisely, \(T\) is irreducible and every \(k\in C\) satisfies
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.exists_sectorVirtualMatrix_ne_zero_of_isCyclicActiveSector
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.isCyclicActiveSector_of_sectorVirtualMatrix_ne_zero
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.sectorVirtualMatrix_eq_zero_of_not_isCyclicActiveSector
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.nonempty_cyclicActiveSector
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.cyclicActiveSectorOneSiteMatrixFamily_span_eq_top
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.cyclicActiveSector_exists_sectorVirtualMatrix_ne_zero
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.exists_cyclicActive_two_edge_return
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.cyclicActiveSectorTraceMatrix_isIrreducible
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.cyclicActiveSectorTraceMatrix_pow_two_diag_pos
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.cyclicActiveSectorTraceMatrix_pow_three_diag_pos
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.cyclicActiveSectorTraceMatrix_isPrimitive
Under the hypotheses of Theorem 20.16.50, suppose that the physical-trace transfer has source zero correlation length. There is a number \(\lambda {\gt}0\) such that, with \(\widehat T=\lambda ^{-1}T\),
and \(\operatorname{tr}(\widehat T^m)=\operatorname{tr}(\widehat T)\) for every \(m\geq 1\). By matrix multiplication, the two-step coefficient is \((\widehat T^2)_{k,h}=\sum _{q\in C}\widehat T_{k,q}\widehat T_{q,h}\). The assertion neither identifies \(\widehat T\) with \(\widehat T^2\) nor implies that the unreduced Beigi trace matrix is primitive or rank one.
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.cyclicActiveLeftRestriction
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.cyclicActiveLeftRestriction_leftTensor
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.cyclicActiveLeftRestriction_rightTensor
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.cyclicActiveLeftRestriction_neighboringOperator
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.reindex_cyclicActiveLeftRestriction_activeSectorTraceMatrix
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.cyclicActiveSectorTraceMatrix_normalized_relations_of_isSourceZCL
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.cyclicActiveSectorTraceMatrix_rank_pow_two_eq_one
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.normalized_cyclicActiveSectorTraceMatrix_rank_pow_two_eq_one
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.exists_normalized_cyclicActiveSectorTraceMatrix_rank_pow_two_eq_one_of_isSourceZCL
For every positive length \(N\), and with \(\sigma _N=\sigma _0\) and \(\tau _N=\tau _0\), the closed matrix-product operator of the cyclic edge-weight tensor is
In the virtual trace there is precisely one potentially nonzero cyclic virtual configuration.
Let \({\cal K}\) be an MPDO whose transformed physical slices satisfy the sector factorization hypothesis. Then for every \(N\ge 1\) and every cyclic sector assignment \(k_1,\ldots ,k_N\) with \(k_{N+1}=k_1\),
This is the positivity half of the display at [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1446–1450 ] .
Let \(N\geq 1\) and let \(k=(k_0,\ldots ,k_{N-1})\) be a cyclic sector configuration of a physical-sector factorization. The trace of the cyclic neighboring product factors into the product of the neighboring traces, and so does the trace of its square:
with site labels read modulo \(N\). These are the coefficient-extraction identities for the cyclic direct-sum form of [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1580–1593 ] .
Let \(N\geq 1\) and let \(k_0,\ldots ,k_{N-1}\) be a cyclic sequence of sectors. Fix matrix indices in the left and right factor of every sector, and abbreviate
With all site labels read modulo \(N\),
This is the entrywise cyclic contraction at [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1446–1450 ] .
Let \(\mathcal A=\prod _\alpha M_{d_\alpha }\), and let \(F:\mathcal A\to \mathcal A\) be positive and trace preserving. Suppose that the trace adjoint \(F^*\) satisfies the Schwarz inequality and that \(F\) fixes a family \(\rho =(\rho _\alpha )_\alpha \) for which every \(\rho _\alpha \) is positive definite. If \(\mathcal F=\operatorname{Fix}(F)\), then, for every \(L{\gt}0\), \(\dim C_L(\mathcal F)\leq \dim \mathcal F\).
Let \(F\) be a positive trace-preserving endomorphism of \(\mathcal A=\prod _\alpha M_{d_\alpha }\). Suppose that each \(V_j\) is fixed by \(F\) and, for some \(L{\gt}0\), the identity belongs to
Then there is a fixed family \(\rho =(\rho _\alpha )_\alpha \) such that every \(\rho _\alpha \) is positive definite.
This is a local finite-product consequence used to formalize the fixed-point argument in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.4, lines 1980–1993 ] ; CPSV16 applies Wolf’s density-block description directly rather than stating this intermediate result.
Let \(S\) and \(C\) be sets of sectors. If \(\eta _{k,h}=0\) for every \(k\in S\) and \(h\in C\), then \(XY=0\) for every \(X\in \mathcal{A}_S\) and \(Y\in \mathcal{A}_C\). No conclusion in the reverse product order is asserted. This is the directed local-orthogonality implication used in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1463–1470 ] .
Let \(K\) be an MPO tensor. For every chain length \(N\), the self-overlap of the doubled-index MPS family equals the Hilbert–Schmidt trace of the closed operator:
This is a project derivation preparing the Lemma C.5 route of [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1473–1499 ] ; the pure-state analogue is the normalized-MPV self-overlap lemma of [ CPGSV16 , lines 1080–1100 ] . It is not a statement of that source. Until a trace normalization is established, the right-hand side is the raw squared Hilbert–Schmidt norm of the MPO family, not a normalized-state purity.
If two doubled-index tensors are related by an invertible gauge and a nonzero phase, then the physical-trace transfer of one is nilpotent if and only if that of the other is nilpotent. Identifying equal bond dimensions does not alter this condition.
Let \(B\) be a translation-invariant positive two-site bond, written as an operator \(\widehat B\) on an ordered pair of physical spaces. Under the same three-site identification for both translates,
Thus these two operators are respectively the left and right overlapping lifts of \(\widehat B\). Moreover, \(\widehat B\) is Hermitian and the two lifts commute. These are exactly the local hypotheses needed for the Bravyi–Vyalyi decomposition invoked at [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1599–1605 ] .
- MPOTensor.reindex_embedLocalOperator_zero_eq_leftOverlappingLift
- MPOTensor.reindex_embedLocalOperator_one_eq_rightOverlappingLift
- MPOTensor.TranslationInvariantBondData.pairBond_isHermitian
- MPOTensor.TranslationInvariantBondData.reindex_bondAt_zero_eq_leftOverlappingLift
- MPOTensor.TranslationInvariantBondData.reindex_bondAt_one_eq_rightOverlappingLift
- MPOTensor.TranslationInvariantBondData.overlappingLifts_pairBond_comm
- MPOTensor.EtaLocalStructureData.pairBond_isHermitian
- MPOTensor.EtaLocalStructureData.reindex_bondAt_zero_eq_leftOverlappingLift
- MPOTensor.EtaLocalStructureData.reindex_bondAt_one_eq_rightOverlappingLift
- MPOTensor.EtaLocalStructureData.overlappingLifts_pairBond_comm
Let \({\cal K}\) be an injective MPO tensor satisfying SAL. Then it admits a physical-sector factorization for which every neighboring operator \(\eta _{k,h}=\sum _a (r_k)_a\otimes (l_h)_a\) is positive semidefinite. Zero-weight Hayashi sectors remain in the physical direct sum, but their right tensors may be set to zero without changing the physical slices.
- MPOTensor.conjugated_middle_threeSiteClosure
- MPOTensor.exists_active_sectorVirtualMatrix_ne_zero
- MPOTensor.zeroWeightReparameterizedInverseMapPhysicalSectorFactorization_isRecurrentSupport
- MPOTensor.exists_rephase_zeroWeightInverseMap_posSemidef
- MPOTensor.exists_positive_inverseMapPhysicalSectorFactorization
- MPOTensor.exists_positive_physicalSectorFactorization_of_isSAL
Let \((\eta _{k,h})\) be a neighboring-operator family for which every nonempty cyclic tensor product is positive semidefinite. Suppose, in addition, that every nonzero edge \(k\to h\) admits a directed return path from \(h\) to \(k\). Then there are unit complex numbers \(z_k\) such that \(z_k^{-1}z_h\, \eta _{k,h}\geq 0\) for all \(k\) and \(h\). Consequently, if the neighboring operators arise from the inverse-map physical-sector factorization of an injective MPDO and its nonzero support is recurrent, the sector tensors admit a reciprocal rephasing for which all neighboring operators are positive semidefinite. This factorization determines the positive commuting nearest-neighbor product structure of Proposition C.8.
This is a scope-restricted result. Recurrence is not a hypothesis of Lemma C.4 in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1406–1450 ] . Its derivation for the zero-weight reparameterized inverse-map factorization is treated in Theorem 20.15.4.41 and recorded in [ con26t ] .
Let \(N\geq 1\), and fix a cyclic sector assignment \(k_0,\ldots ,k_{N-1}\) such that every operator \(\eta _{k_n,k_{n+1}}\) is nonzero. If the corresponding cyclic tensor product is positive semidefinite, then there are nonzero scalars \(c_n\) satisfying
This is a choice on one fixed cycle. It does not assert that choices made on two different cycles agree on a common edge.
Let \(B\ge 0\) be a two-site bond whose periodic translates commute. There is a positive integer \(R\) and a matrix-product tensor \(C\) of virtual dimension \(R\), both independent of the chain length, such that for every \(N\ge 2\),
The construction gives a positive \(R\) independent of \(N\). No normality, zero-correlation-length, or scalar normalization hypothesis is required.
- MPOTensor.reindex_mpo_cyclicEdgeWeightTensor_etaCyclicEdgeWeight
- MPOTensor.TranslationInvariantBondData.nonempty_fixedProductTensorData
- MPOTensor.TranslationInvariantBondData.fixedProductTensorData
- MPOTensor.EtaLocalStructureData.nonempty_fixedProductTensorData
- MPOTensor.EtaLocalStructureData.fixedProductTensorData
Suppose one fixed tensor \(C\) generates the products of the bond carried by an eta-local structure. Then the doubled-index tensors of \(M\) and \(C\) are eventually nonzero proportional. The proof uses only lengths \(N\ge 2\) and therefore assumes no relation at length one.
Let \(\eta _{q,h}\) be arbitrary matrices on \(H_{q,r}\otimes H_{h,l}\) with a rank-one trace factorization. For a nonempty retained sector word \(k=(k_0,\ldots ,k_{L-1})\), write
The edge contraction corresponding to tracing the two boundary sites of the longer cyclic chain is
This is the edge-coordinate interpretation of the displayed fourth-region trace in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1606 and 1613–1617 ] .
Let \(\widehat B\) be a pair-indexed positive two-site bond whose periodic translates commute. There are positive dimensions \(d_{l,q}=\dim H_{q,l}\) and \(d_{r,q}=\dim H_{q,r}\), a unitary decomposition \(H\cong \bigoplus _{q=0}^{K-1}H_{q,l}\otimes H_{q,r}\), and Hermitian operators \(R_q\) on \(H\otimes H_{q,l}\) and \(S_q\) on \(H_{q,r}\otimes H\) such that
The basis bijection for each sector enumerates the numerical indices in right–left order,
Writing \(e(q,(r,s))\) for this basis bijection, the left and right spatial coordinates are respectively
Hence the tensor factors in the displayed block actions occur in left–right order.
Let \(\sigma ^{(N)}(\mathcal K)\) be realized, for every \(N\ge 2\), by translates of one positive commuting bond. There are one unitary \(U\), positive sector dimensions, and positive semidefinite operators \(\eta _{q,h}\), all independent of \(N\), such that for every \(N\ge 2\) there is a constant \(c_N{\gt}0\) satisfying, with \(k_N=k_0\),
Here \(E_N\) is the cyclic regrouping from the edge factors \(H_{k_n,r}\otimes H_{k_{n+1},l}\) to the site factors \(H_{k_n,r}\otimes H_{k_n,l}\). The factor \(c_N\) is retained from the proportionality relation in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1571–1576 ] . The passage at [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1603–1605 ] suppresses this factor when invoking the coefficient-free equation sigmaNK2; the coefficient-free assertion is not part of the present theorem.
- MPOTensor.sitewisePhysicalMatrix_conjTranspose
- MPOTensor.reindex_sitewisePhysicalMatrix_two
- MPOTensor.sitewisePhysicalMatrix_one
- MPOTensor.sitewisePhysicalMatrix_mul_conjTranspose
- MPOTensor.singleKrausMap_bondProduct_of_unitary
- MPOTensor.EtaLocalStructureData.exists_positive_cyclic_eta_block_decomposition
The same \(\eta \)-local structure gives a single-bond product witness on every finite periodic chain.
An \(\eta \)-local structure together with the doubled-index transfer condition gives the corresponding single-bond branch.
The \(\eta \)-local structure itself determines a single-bond commuting-form witness for every chain length \(N\ge 2\): writing \(B\) for its bond, the translated copies commute, \([B_{i,i+1},B_{j,j+1}]=0\), and there exists \(c{\gt}0\) with
This is the one-bond product conclusion used in [ CPGSV16 , Proposition C.8 ] .
- MPOTensor.EtaLocalStructureData.hasCommutingForm
- MPOTensor.EtaLocalStructureData.formAt_realizes
- MPOTensor.EtaLocalStructureData.formAt_bondAt_comm
- MPOTensor.EtaLocalStructureData.exists_positive_scalar_mpo_eq_product
- MPOTensor.EtaLocalStructureData.positive_commuting_product_form
- MPOTensor.hasCommutingForm_of_etaLocalStructure
The single positive bond determined by the \(\eta \)-local structure gives the one-sector instance of the explicit GSNNCH decomposition.
Suppose that a physical-sector factorization of \(K\) is given and that every neighboring operator \(\eta _{k,h}\) is positive semidefinite. Then the physical two-site bond determines an \(\eta \)-local structure for \(K\). Its translated copies commute pairwise, and for every \(N\geq 2\), \(\rho _N=B_0B_1\cdots B_{N-1}\). If the virtual dimension of \(K\) is positive, then \(K\) itself is a fixed tensor representation of this product family, with the same virtual dimension. Thus the positive normalization scalar may be chosen to be \(1\). This is Proposition C.8 conditional on the coherently positive physical-sector factorization that the source derives from SAL.
Let \(A\) be the normal doubled-index source tensor of positive bond dimension \(D\), and let \(C\) be a fixed tensor for its commuting-bond product. Suppose that \(sC\) is normal for some \(s{\gt}0\). Then there is a complex number \(\zeta \), with \(|\zeta |=1\), such that, for every \(N\ge 2\),
This is a conditional reduction: it does not assert that \(C\), or any rescaling of \(C\), is normal.
Let \(A\) be the normal doubled-index source tensor of positive bond dimension \(D\), let \(C\) be a fixed tensor for its commuting-bond product, and suppose that \(sC\) is normal for some \(s{\gt}0\). Then the unit phase is trivial. For every \(N\ge 2\),
Thus a positive normal rescaling of the fixed product tensor already supplies the positive geometric realization law.
The trace matrix induced by the extracted family is entrywise \(T_{k,h}=1\) in both its complex-valued form and its real-valued form. If there are \(m\) sectors, then \(T=\mathbf{1}\mathbf{1}^{\mathsf T}\) and \(\operatorname{tr}(T)=m\).
The trace is
Under the rank-one trace factorization, this becomes
This is the trace calculation in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1531–1535 ] .
Suppose that, in one fixed coordinate decomposition \(H\cong \bigoplus _q H_{q,r}\otimes H_{q,l}\), after regrouping the two-site coordinates according to this decomposition, a two-site operator has the form
For every \(N\ge 2\), regroup the cyclic chain as
Then, in these coordinates and with \(k_N=k_0\),
At \(N=2\), the two translated windows have the opposite orders \((0,1)\) and \((1,0)\) and give the two oriented factors \(\eta _{k_0,k_1}\) and \(\eta _{k_1,k_0}\).
In the setting of Theorem 20.15.4.39, assume in addition that the nonzero neighboring operators occur in symmetric pairs: \(\eta _{k,h}=0\) forces \(\eta _{h,k}=0\). Then there is a positive semidefinite family \(\eta '_{k,h}\) with \(\eta '_{k,k}=\eta _{k,k}\) and, for every pair of sectors, scalars \(c_{k,h}\ne 0\) with \(\eta '_{k,h}=c_{k,h} \eta _{k,h}\) and \(\eta '_{h,k}=c_{k,h}^{-1} \eta _{h,k}\). In particular every two-site block \(\eta '_{k,h}\otimes \eta '_{h,k}=\eta _{k,h}\otimes \eta _{h,k}\) of the sector-adapted decomposition is unchanged.
The source asserts at [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1446–1450 ] that the \(\eta \)’s can be chosen positive semidefinite, without the symmetric-support hypothesis. That hypothesis excludes a scalar obstruction: a nonzero neighboring operator whose reverse pair vanishes is constrained only by cycles through at least three sectors, and a coherent choice for the whole family can then fail.
Every product \(a_kb_h\) is non-negative. If \(a_kb_h=0\), then \(\eta _{k,h}=0\) and \(\Omega _{k,h}=0\).
If the doubled-index tensors of \(M\) and \(C\) are eventually nonzero proportional, then for each fixed \(L\) and every sufficiently large \(N\geq L\),
This equality alone does not identify the virtual sector families of \(M\) and \(C\), and therefore does not prove the rank-one separation or the Markov decomposition asserted in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1597–1619 ] .
Suppose that \(K\) is equipped with a physical-sector factorization \(F\). Let \(B_i\) denote the cyclic translate beginning at site \(i\) of the physical two-site bond determined by \(F\). For every \(N\geq 2\), the \(N\)-site periodic operator is
No positivity, zero-correlation-length, injectivity, or normalization hypothesis is required. This is the product identity in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, Proposition C.8, lines 1581–1593 ] , conditional here on the given physical-sector factorization.
Let \(\mathcal K\) be injective with nonzero four-site trace, let \(\rho \) be a three-site closure of \(\mathcal K\) against the normalized fourth-site tail \(R_4\), and choose a Hayashi decomposition of \(\rho \). Then there exist sector tensors \(l_k\) and \(r_k\) such that, for all virtual indices \(\beta _1,\alpha _3\),
The neighboring operators \(\eta _{k,h}\) are assembled from these tensors in Definition 20.15.3.1; the remaining steps of [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, Lemma C.4 ] prove the all-length identity and primitivity.
The matrix \(\tau _H\) is positive definite and has trace one.
Every fiberwise form of \(\mathcal T_0\) and \(\mathcal S_0\) is trace-preserving and completely positive.
Every fiberwise shift is trace-preserving and completely positive.
Let \(M\) be a matrix product density operator of operator bond dimension \(D\). For every positive chain length \(N\), every cut \(0\leq L\leq N\), and every nonzero finite-chain trace,
This is the finite-chain estimate invoked in the proof of Proposition 4.5 of [ CPGSV16 ] . The nonzero-trace hypothesis states explicitly the normalization convention preceding that proposition. This theorem does not assert the proposition’s thermodynamic-limit clause.
Let \(M\) be an MPO tensor of operator bond dimension \(D\). Fix a chain of length \(N\) and a cut with \(0\leq L\leq N\). If the corresponding finite-chain operator is positive semidefinite and has nonzero trace, then
No global positivity, local purification, canonical form, or separate positive-bond-dimension hypothesis is required. The cuts \(L=0\) and \(L=N\) are included.
Let \(M\) and \(C\) be MPO tensors, possibly of different bond dimensions, and fix a chain length \(N\). Write
with the inverse of zero understood to be zero. Suppose that, for some \(c\in \mathbb {C}\setminus \{ 0\} \), the doubled-index matrix-product vectors satisfy \(|V^{(N)}(M)\rangle =c|V^{(N)}(C)\rangle \). Then
The proportionality hypothesis is the finite-length form of the hypothesis in [ CPGSV16 , Theorem 2.10 ] . The conclusion is an auxiliary cancellation used in the comparison preceding [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1597–1619 ] .
Under the hypotheses of Theorem 20.16.23, for every \(L\leq N\) the reduced operators on the first \(L\) sites agree:
Let \(C\) be the selected fixed tensor of the preceding theorem. There are physical sectors \(\mathbb {C}^d\cong \bigoplus _{q=0}^{K-1}H_q^L\otimes H_q^R\), a unitary \(U\), and matrices \(L_\beta (q)\) and \(R_\alpha (q)\) such that, writing \(C_{\beta ,\alpha }\) for the physical matrix at fixed virtual indices,
The neighboring operators \(\eta _{q,h}=\sum _a R_a(q)\otimes L_a(h)\) are positive semidefinite. If \(U_2\) denotes the induced two-site change of coordinates, then
Thus the physical-sector factorization belongs to the same tensor \(C\) whose closed operators are the fixed products of \(B\).
- MPOTensor.TranslationInvariantBondData.exists_positive_physicalSectorFactorization_fixedProductTensorData
- MPOTensor.TranslationInvariantBondData.PositivePhysicalSectorFixedProductTensorData
- MPOTensor.TranslationInvariantBondData.nonempty_positivePhysicalSectorFixedProductTensorData
- MPOTensor.TranslationInvariantBondData.positivePhysicalSectorFixedProductTensorData
- MPOTensor.TranslationInvariantBondData.fixedProductTensorDataPhysicalSectorFactorization
- MPOTensor.TranslationInvariantBondData.fixedProductTensorDataPhysicalSectorFactorization_physicalBond_eq
- MPOTensor.TranslationInvariantBondData.fixedProductTensorDataPhysicalSectorFactorization_neighboring_pos
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.etaSectorFinEquiv
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.sectorCoordinateBond_etaPair_decomposition
Let \(F\) be a linear endomorphism of \(\mathcal A=\prod _\alpha M_{d_\alpha }\). Suppose that the following three conditions hold, with the second required for every bond matrix \(X\):
Then \(F=\operatorname{id}_{\mathcal A}\).
This is the finite-dimensional conclusion in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.4, lines 1980–1993 ] . It does not assume that the products \(V_c(X_1)\cdots V_c(X_L)\) are fixed.
Let \(F\) be a positive trace-preserving endomorphism of \(\mathcal A=\prod _\alpha M_{d_\alpha }\) whose trace adjoint satisfies the Schwarz inequality. Suppose that, for some \(L{\gt}0\), \(C_L(V_c)=\mathcal A\) and \(F(V_c(X))=V_c(X)\) for every bond matrix \(X\). Then \(F=\operatorname{id}_{\mathcal A}\). No product \(V_c(X_1)\cdots V_c(X_L)\) is assumed to be fixed.
This is the implication used for each transported square composite in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.4, lines 1980–1995 ] .
Fix sectors \((k,l,h)\). On the regrouped sector space, set
Then \(C_{01}^{k,l,h}C_{12}^{k,l,h} =C_{12}^{k,l,h}C_{01}^{k,l,h}\). This is the fixed-sector calculation in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, Proposition C.8, lines 1589–1593 ] .
Suppose that the physical slices in the Hayashi basis satisfy
Let \(\eta _{q,h}=r_q l_h\). For every \(N\geq 1\) and every sector configuration \(k\), the corresponding diagonal block of \(\operatorname{reindex}_{\Phi _N}(M_N(\widetilde{\cal K}))\) is \(\Omega _k\).
Let \(F\) be a linear endomorphism of \(\prod _\alpha M_{d_\alpha }\). Suppose that \(C_L(V_c)\) is the whole sector algebra and, for every choice of bond matrices \(X_1,\ldots ,X_L\),
Then \(F\) is the identity.
Let \(A=\bigoplus _t \mu _t A_t\) be a weighted block-diagonal tensor in flattened virtual coordinates. For every block \(s\), the canonical inclusion \(V_s\) of that block satisfies
Here \(P_s\) is the corresponding block projection, transported to the flattened coordinates. Moreover,
This is the exact blockwise virtual-corner identity from [ CPGSV16 , Section 2.3, equation II_Aiplusk1, lines 195–219 ] . Appendix C.2, Case I, lines 1374–1450 and 1571–1619 is the downstream application context; no positivity after insertion of \(P_s\) is asserted here.
- MPSTensor.SectorDecomposition.flatBlockInclusion
- MPSTensor.SectorDecomposition.flatBlockInclusion_isometry
- MPSTensor.SectorDecomposition.flatBlockInclusion_mul_conjTranspose
- MPSTensor.SectorDecomposition.toTensor_mul_flatBlockInclusion
- MPSTensor.SectorDecomposition.flatBlockInclusion_conjTranspose_mul_toTensor
- MPSTensor.SectorDecomposition.flatWeight_smul_flatBasis_eq_compression
For the inverse-map-selected four-sector factorization of the tensor in Theorem 20.15.8.5, let \(C_{k,h}=\operatorname{tr}(\eta _{k,h})\). Then
Consequently there is neither a trace-preserving family which sends each four-site neighboring operator \(\Theta _{k,h}\) to \(\eta _{k,h}\) while retaining \((k,h)\), nor such a family in the reverse direction.
Nevertheless, the two-site blocking of this tensor has trace-preserving completely positive renormalization maps. These maps are obtained from the label-coarsening rule
so they mix or coarsen the selected labels rather than retaining every fixed outer-sector pair.
- MPOTensor.ActiveSectorSpanningCounterexample.factorization_neighboringTraceMatrix
- MPOTensor.ActiveSectorSpanningCounterexample.factorization_neighboringTraceMatrix_pow_two_eq_pow_three
- MPOTensor.ActiveSectorSpanningCounterexample.factorization_neighboringTraceMatrix_ne_pow_three
- MPOTensor.ActiveSectorSpanningCounterexample.not_exists_pairwise_fourSite_coarsening
- MPOTensor.ActiveSectorSpanningCounterexample.not_exists_pairwise_fourSite_refinement
- MPOTensor.ActiveSectorSpanningCounterexample.blockTwo_tensor_isRFPViaTS_and_pairwise_trace_obstruction
The four-sector tensor in Theorem 20.15.8.2 has trace-preserving completely positive maps \(S,T\) such that, for every virtual matrix \(X\),
Its two-site physical blocking has maps satisfying the same two identities and is therefore also a renormalization fixed point. On the other hand, for the source-normalized scalar representative
the two-site blocking \(A^{[2]}\) is not a renormalization fixed point.
The last assertion concerns literal trace-preserving diagrammatic renormalization. The rescaled tensor obeys an idempotence relation up to a positive scalar, but it does not satisfy the paper’s literal zero-correlation-length diagram. Consequently it is not, by itself, a counterexample to Theorem 4.9 of [ CPGSV16 ] . The simple-biCF-BNT hypotheses of that theorem are not part of this theorem’s statement.
Suppose that the common blocking has been performed, so that the BNT representatives have a simultaneous one-letter span. For the normalized three-site marginal \(\sigma _3^{(4)}\), there are a simultaneous inverse \(C\) and a Hayashi decomposition such that every Markov sector \(k\) with \(p_k\ne 0\) has a unique BNT label \(j_k\). Consequently,
Each \(P_s\) is an orthogonal projection, \(P_sP_t=0\) for \(s\ne t\), and \(\sum _sP_s=P_{\mathrm{act}}\). No independent nonzero-closing-matrix hypothesis is required. This is the four-site specialization of equations QkKjs and Pis in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1714–1737 ] . The Hayashi decomposition uses the forward equality characterization of strong subadditivity recorded in the corresponding theorem in the companion quantum-channel volume [ LTC26 , “Hayashi SSA-equality characterization” ] ; no additional analytic assumption is introduced here.
Let \(K\) satisfy the strong area law. If \(\sigma _3^{(4)}(K)\) is obtained from its normalized four-site periodic state by tracing out the fourth site, then \(\sigma _3^{(4)}(K)\) admits a quantum Markov decomposition on its middle site.
Under the canonical identification of two-site configurations with ordered pairs, embedding an arbitrary two-site operator \(B\) beginning at site zero gives \(B\), while embedding it beginning at site one gives \(SBS^{-1}\), where \(S(x\otimes y)=y\otimes x\) exchanges the two factors.
Suppose that \(\mathcal S[M_2(X)]=M_1(X)\) and \(\mathcal T[M_1(X)]=M_2(X)\) for every virtual operator \(X\). Then, for every \(N\) and \(X\),
In particular, these identities hold for every periodic MPO operator. Hence the two maps supplied by a renormalization fixed point act on rings of every length as required in the proof of [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C, lines 1333–1341 ] .
After the canonical regrouping of all physical-sector indices, the full closures are
Every matrix entry between distinct sector tuples vanishes.
Let \(M\) be in normalized BNT-refined horizontal form and let \(P\) be a matrix for which \(P\widetilde M_vP\) is nonzero for some vertical letter \(v\). Then the first-site compression \(P_1H^{(N+1)}P_1\) is nonzero for some \(N\). This is the separation step used in [ CPGSV16 , Proposition 4.13, line 1898 ] .
The normalized BNT-refined horizontal hypothesis is stronger than the literal CPSV canonical-form hypothesis. The literal separation statement is Theorem 17.4.61; it does not by itself construct the grouped vertical sectors used here.
Let \(\rho \) be a positive semidefinite trace-one operator on four \(d\)-dimensional sites, and suppose that \(\rho \) has the sector decomposition of Definition 4.8. Regroup the sites as \(A=\{ 0\} \), \(B=\{ 1,3\} \), and \(C=\{ 2\} \). Then the resulting tripartite state admits a quantum Markov decomposition on \(B\). Consequently,
If every finite-chain operator of an MPO tensor has the explicit sector form of Definition 20.13.1 and a nonzero trace, then the normalized finite-chain states are density operators with that sector form, so the tensor generates Gibbs states of a nearest-neighbor commuting Hamiltonian.
Each \(Q_k\) is an orthogonal projection, distinct summands are mutually orthogonal, and the family resolves the identity:
The first two assertions follow from the orthogonal direct-sum decomposition in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1364–1368 ] ; the resolution of the identity is stated in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1693–1697 ] .
For an injective simple MPO tensor, contracting \(K^{-1}\) with \(K\) recovers the matrix units on the virtual bond space. Likewise, every right virtual insertion admits a physical realization, this realization is multiplicative, and the analogous left-insertion statement also holds.
Let \(K\) be injective and suppose that \(\rho ^{(N)}(K)\geq 0\) for every \(N\geq 1\). Then the linear span of its physical slices is closed under conjugate transpose. More precisely, there is \(X\in \mathrm{GL}_D(\mathbb {C})\) such that
for all virtual indices \(\beta ,\alpha \).
Every injective MPO tensor satisfying SAL generates Gibbs states of a nearest-neighbor commuting Hamiltonian: the normalized finite-chain states are density operators with the explicit sector form of Definition 20.13.1, realized through one sector. The one-sector form is the commuting product form in which [ CPGSV16 , Proposition C.8 ] states its conclusion for an injective tensor, combined here with the density normalization of [ CPGSV16 , Definition 4.8 ] .
Let \({\cal K}\) be an injective tensor generating MPDOs, let \(R\) close a three-site state \(\rho \), and choose a Hayashi decomposition with weights \(p_k\). Fix outer indices for which the corresponding entry of \(R\) is nonzero, and let \(F\) be the zero-weight reparameterized inverse-map factorization. There are coherent sector phases for which all neighboring operators are positive semidefinite and the active one-site matrices span \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\). Every active sector contains a nonzero virtual matrix, every virtual matrix in a zero-weight sector vanishes, every nonzero neighboring edge closes through a third active sector, every inactive left tensor vanishes, and \(I_*\) is nonempty.
For all sectors \(k,h\), the neighboring contraction of the resulting physical-sector factorization is the inverse-map operator
This is equation etarl in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1441–1445 ] .
Suppose that \(\mathcal K\) is injective, \(\rho \) is its three-site closure against \(R\), and a Hayashi decomposition of \(\rho \) has been chosen. Write
Then every diagonal sector satisfies
The probability \(p_k\) remains explicit because both sector density operators are normalized. No zero-correlation-length or non-vanishing hypothesis is used in this comparison.
In the setting of Theorem 20.15.2.47, for all \(k\ne k'\), every off-diagonal sector satisfies
Together with the diagonal comparison this gives the direct-sum structure of the factorized tensor: the direct sum over sectors is inherited from the splitting of the middle site.
There is a four-sector, bond-dimension-two tensor with a refined Hayashi decomposition whose four sectors are one-dimensional and have weight \(1/4\). Its three-site state is diagonal, with
The normalized four-site tail is \(LQ\). For this tail, the inverse-map construction recovers the closed sector tensors \(L\) and \(Q\) exactly. Its neighboring operators therefore coincide with those obtained directly from \(L\) and \(Q\), while \(Q(1-LQ)L\ne 0\). The inverse-map construction is the one in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1413–1455 ] .
- MPOTensor.ActiveSectorSpanningCounterexample.normalizedFourSiteTail_tensor
- MPOTensor.ActiveSectorSpanningCounterexample.crossSectorMatrix
- MPOTensor.ActiveSectorSpanningCounterexample.sectorMatrix_eq_crossSectorMatrix
- MPOTensor.ActiveSectorSpanningCounterexample.crossSectorMatrix_mul
- MPOTensor.ActiveSectorSpanningCounterexample.trace_crossSectorMatrix_mul_transfer
- MPOTensor.ActiveSectorSpanningCounterexample.threeSiteState
- MPOTensor.ActiveSectorSpanningCounterexample.hayashiData
- MPOTensor.ActiveSectorSpanningCounterexample.sectorTensorL_hayashiData
- MPOTensor.ActiveSectorSpanningCounterexample.sectorTensorR_hayashiData
- MPOTensor.ActiveSectorSpanningCounterexample.inverseMapFactorization
- MPOTensor.ActiveSectorSpanningCounterexample.inverseMapFactorization_neighboringOperator
- MPOTensor.ActiveSectorSpanningCounterexample.rectangular_remainder_ne_zero
- MPOTensor.ActiveSectorSpanningCounterexample.inverseMap_provenance_preserves_rectangular_remainder
For every middle physical index \(p_2\),
Let \(\mathcal K=\{ \mathcal K^{pq}\} _{p,q=0}^{d-1}\) be an MPO tensor and set \(\mathcal K_V^{ij}=\sum _{p,q}V_{i,p}\overline{V_{j,q}}\mathcal K^{pq}\). Write \(A^{(p,q)}=\mathcal K^{pq}\) and \(A_V^{(i,j)}=\mathcal K_V^{ij}\) for the associated doubled-index MPS tensors. For every \(V\), the matrix in (20) satisfies \(A_V^\tau =\sum _\sigma W_{\tau ,\sigma }A^\sigma \).
Suppose now that \(V^\dagger V=\mathbb {1}\). Then
Here \(P_{\mathcal K}\) is the orthogonal projection onto the joint column span of the physical slices of \(\mathcal K\). Left-canonical normalization of \(A\) implies left-canonical normalization of \(A_V\).
For arbitrary \(V\), positivity of every positive-length periodic operator for \(\mathcal K\) implies the same positivity for \(\mathcal K_V\). Moreover, if two doubled-index tensors are related by one virtual gauge, applying the same \(V\) to their physical indices preserves that gauge.
This theorem is project-derived and is not stated in [ CPGSV16 ] . Its application is to the normal-block and per-sector constructions in lines 217–246, 1628–1665, and 1740–1782 of that source.
- MPSTensor.transferMap_kraus_isometry
- MPSTensor.isLeftCanonical_kraus_isometry
- MPSTensor.isInjective_kraus_isometry
- MPSTensor.isInjective_of_kraus_mixing_isInjective
- MPSTensor.isInjective_kraus_isometry_iff
- MPSTensor.GaugeEquiv.sum_smul
- MPOTensor.doubledPhysicalMatrix_isometry
- MPOTensor.toMPSTensor_changePhysicalBasis
- MPOTensor.transferMap_toMPSTensor_changePhysicalBasis
- MPOTensor.isInjective_toMPSTensor_changePhysicalBasis_iff
- MPOTensor.isLeftCanonical_toMPSTensor_changePhysicalBasis
- MPOTensor.isNormalTensor_toMPSTensor_changePhysicalBasis_iff
- MPOTensor.IsMPDO.changePhysicalBasis
- MPOTensor.isMPDO_changePhysicalBasis_iff
- MPOTensor.IsSAL.changePhysicalBasis_of_isometry
- MPOTensor.isSAL_changePhysicalBasis_iff
- MPOTensor.physTraceTransfer_changePhysicalBasis
- MPOTensor.gaugeEquiv_toMPSTensor_changePhysicalBasis
- MPOTensor.physicalSliceColumnCoisometry
- MPOTensor.physicalSliceColumnCoisometry_mul_conjTranspose
- MPOTensor.physicalSliceColumns_changePhysicalBasis
- MPOTensor.physicalSliceColumns_mul_conjTranspose_changePhysicalBasis
- MPOTensor.physicalSupportProj_changePhysicalBasis
Suppose that the doubled-index MPS tensor of \(M\) is in literal CPSV canonical form and that \(M\) generates matrix product density operators. Assume exact coisometric reconstructions of the one-site and blocked vertical tensors, positive multiplicities and weights for the blocked BNT, and normality of its representatives. For every active product corner \(j\), one has \(0{\lt}\lambda _j\zeta _j\). This is the positivity step of [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.4, lines 2025–2029 ] .
Under the hypotheses of the preceding literal positivity theorem, for every active product corner \(j\) there is a real number \(\omega _j{\gt}0\) such that
Let \(A_M\) be the doubled-index MPS tensor associated to an MPO tensor \(M\). If \(A_M\) is in literal CPSV canonical form and \(L\geq 1\), then the doubled-index MPS tensor associated to \(M^{[L]}\) is again in literal CPSV canonical form. The same conclusion holds for the concrete two-site blocking \(M^{[2]}\).
Let \(M\) generate matrix product density operators, and suppose that its doubled-index MPS tensor is in literal CPSV canonical form. Given an exact coisometric reconstruction of the one-site vertical tensor by a retained direct sum of weighted normal tensors, simultaneous retained-product spectral families exist for all ordered pairs of retained copies. Empty active families are preserved. This is the retained-product decomposition used in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.4, lines 2020–2029 ] .
Let \(M\) generate matrix product density operators, and suppose that its doubled-index MPS tensor is in literal CPSV canonical form. Then there are normal tensors \(A_\alpha \), positive multiplicities \(r_\alpha \), positive numbers \(c_{\alpha ,q}\), and a coisometry \(U\) such that the \(A_\alpha \) form a CPSV basis of normal tensors for \(\widetilde M\) and, writing
one has
Under the hypotheses of Theorem 20.14.8, the concrete two-site block \(M^{[2]}\) has a decomposition of the same form: there are normal tensors \(\widehat A_\alpha \), \(r^{[2]}_\alpha {\gt}0\), \(c^{[2]}_{\alpha ,q}{\gt}0\), and a coisometry \(U^{[2]}\) such that
The tensors \(\widehat A_\alpha \) form a CPSV basis of normal tensors for \(\widetilde{M^{[2]}}\).
Let \(M\) generate matrix product density operators, and suppose that its doubled-index MPS tensor is in literal CPSV canonical form. Given one-site and two-site vertical canonical decompositions and their trace-ratio unitary sector correspondence, there are positive diagonal matrices \(\chi _{\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma }\) and matrices \(U_{\alpha ,\beta }\) such that
Every diagonal entry of \(\chi _{\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma }\) is positive. This is the positive fusion decomposition in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.4, lines 2020–2029 ] .
Scope restriction (active product BNT): Only active product corners occur. A label absent from a fixed product pair has zero fusion multiplicity. See [ con26c ] .
Local fix (Figure-11 fixed-pair support): A fixed product pair may have no active corner, and no unsupported sector is inserted. See [ con26q ] .
Local fix (Figure-11 fusion coisometry): The retained-row map is a coisometry onto the active direct sum, and its adjoint gives the exact reconstruction. See [ con26j ] .
Let \(\{ K_x\} _{x=0}^{g-1}\) be a nonempty finite family of MPO tensors, let \(n_x\) be positive natural numbers, and let \(P_x\) be pairwise orthogonal one-site projections. Suppose that, for every \(N{\gt}0\),
For \(N\geq 2\) and \(1\leq L\leq N\), write \(\widehat\rho _{x,N,L}\) for the normalized marginal of \(\rho ^{(N)}(K_x)\) on the first \(L\) sites. Assume that the sector label is visible on the first retained site:
If every \(K_x\) satisfies SAL, then \(M\) satisfies SAL.
This is the conditional last inference in the proposition at [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1801–1808 ] . It assumes sectorwise SAL. The printed proposition states the conclusion from the GSNNCH form alone, but its proof invokes the single-sector proposition at lines 1597–1619, whose hypotheses include ZCL. The theorem here does not supply that omitted sectorwise implication.
In the setting of Theorem 20.15.2.52, for all sectors \(k,h\) and virtual indices \(\beta _1,\alpha _3\), contracting the shared virtual bond of two neighboring factorized slices leaves the neighboring operator between the outer sector tensors:
This is the single-bond step of the identity assembling \(\bigotimes _{n}\eta _{k_n,k_{n+1}}\) from the factorized chain in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1446–1449 ] .
Suppose that an MPO tensor \(K\) admits a physical-sector factorization through an isometry \(U\), with neighboring operators \(\eta _{q,h}\). If \(\eta _{q,h}\geq 0\) for every pair \((q,h)\), then for every \(N\geq 1\),
Let \(V:\mathbb {C}^d\to \mathbb {C}^e\) satisfy \(V^\dagger V=\mathbb {1}_d\) and \(VV^\dagger =\mathbb {1}_e\), and define \({\cal K}^V_{\beta ,\alpha } =V{\cal K}_{\beta ,\alpha }V^\dagger \). Then \({\cal K}\) admits a physical-sector factorization with
if and only if \({\cal K}^V\) admits one. The same sector spaces, tensors \(l_k,r_k\), neighboring operators \(\eta _{k,h}\), and numbers \(a_k,b_h\) may be used on both sides. This invariance is project-derived; the data being transported are those of [ CPGSV16 , Theorem 4.9(iv) and Appendix C.2, lines 1381–1450 ] , but the equivalence itself is not stated there.
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.ofChangePhysicalBasis
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.toChangePhysicalBasis
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.ofChangePhysicalBasis_neighboringOperator
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.toChangePhysicalBasis_neighboringOperator
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.ofChangePhysicalBasis
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.toChangePhysicalBasis
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.exists_neighboringTraceFactorization_changePhysicalBasis_iff
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.exists_neighboringTraceFactorization_changePhysicalBasis_iff_of_isUnitaryBetween
Suppose that two MPO tensors of the same physical and virtual dimensions differ by an invertible virtual gauge. One admits a physical-sector factorization with neighboring data \(\eta _{k,h}\), \(a_k\), and \(b_h\) if and only if the other does. The same neighboring operators and the same numbers \(a_k,b_h\) may be used on both sides.
Let \(V_F:\mathbb {C}^{d_F}\to \mathbb {C}^d\) and \(V_G:\mathbb {C}^{d_G}\to \mathbb {C}^d\) be two isometric inclusions with the same range projection \(P\):
Set \(Q=V_F^\dagger V_G\). Then
Consequently, the restrictions of \({\cal K}\) along \(V_F\) and \(V_G\) admit neighboring trace factorizations simultaneously.
Both equivalences are project-derived and are not stated in [ CPGSV16 ] . The gauge transformation is the one discussed in Section 2.3, lines 187–195; the support-restriction setting is that of Appendix C.2, lines 1680–1691 and 1733–1770.
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.ofGaugeEquiv
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.exists_neighboringTraceFactorization_iff_of_gaugeEquiv
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSupportRestrictionData.supportCoordinateChange
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSupportRestrictionData.supportCoordinateChange_isUnitaryBetween
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSupportRestrictionData.changePhysicalBasis_supportCoordinateChange
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSupportRestrictionData.exists_neighboringTraceFactorization_restriction_iff
Let \(M\) be an MPO tensor admitting a physical-sector factorization whose neighboring operators satisfy the trace factorization of Definition 20.15.3.32. Closing the physical legs of the factorized slices writes the physical-trace transfer as a rectangular product
whose opposite product is the rank-one coefficient matrix
Consequently every positive power of the physical-trace transfer and every nonempty closed chain has unit trace:
In particular, a tensor whose closed chains do not all have unit trace admits no physical-sector factorization with positive neighboring operators and normalized rank-one trace coefficients. The normalization \(\operatorname{tr}(T)=1\) invoked in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, line 1498 ] is therefore a constraint on the tensor rather than a convention, and the ambient normalization at [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1755–1759 ] constrains only the weighted sum over the representatives of a basis of normal tensors, not each representative separately.
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.leftTraceMatrix
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.rightTraceMatrix
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.trace_neighboringOperator_eq_sum_trace_mul_trace
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.physTraceTransfer_eq_leftTraceMatrix_mul_rightTraceMatrix
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.rightTraceMatrix_mul_leftTraceMatrix_apply
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.rightTraceMatrix_mul_leftTraceMatrix_eq_vecMulVec
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.trace_physTraceTransfer_pow_eq_one
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.trace_physTraceTransfer_eq_one
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.trace_mpo_eq_one
Let \(k=(k_0,\ldots ,k_n)\) be a nonempty retained sector word and \(t=(t_0,\ldots ,t_m)\) a nonempty suffix sector word. In open-edge coordinates \(x=(x_{\mathrm{int}},x_{\partial })\) and \(y=(y_{\mathrm{int}},y_{\partial })\),
Suppose that \(\{ K_x\} _{x=0}^{g-1}\) has an orthogonally supported family of commuting sector products, and let \(n_x\geq 1\) be natural numbers. For every \(N\geq 2\), let \(c_x(N)\geq 0\) and suppose that
Then \(M\) has the explicit GSNNCH sector form.
- MPOTensor.OrthogonalCommutingSectorFamily.coefficientRoot
- MPOTensor.OrthogonalCommutingSectorFamily.toCoefficientRescaledGSNNCHData
- MPOTensor.OrthogonalCommutingSectorFamily.toCoefficientRescaledGSNNCHData_sectorProduct
- MPOTensor.OrthogonalCommutingSectorFamily.toCoefficientRescaledGSNNCHData_unnormalizedState
- MPOTensor.hasGSNNCHForm_of_nonnegative_orthogonalCommutingSectorFamily
Suppose that \((M_\alpha )_\alpha \) is a basis of normal tensors and that \((c_\alpha )_\alpha \) is any family of nonzero complex scalars. Then there is a positive integer \(L\) such that \(C_L(V_c)=\prod _\alpha M_{d_\alpha }\).
For every pair \((k,h)\), the operators \(\widehat\eta _{k,h}\) and \(\widehat\Omega _{k,h}\) are positive semidefinite.
If \(a_kb_h\ne 0\), then \(\widehat\eta _{k,h}\) and \(\widehat\Omega _{k,h}\) have trace one. Consequently the maps
are trace-preserving and completely positive. These are the individual preparations \(\mathcal S_{k,h}\) and \(\mathcal T_{k,h}\) in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1527–1535 and 1551–1555 ] .
If \(Z_4\ne 0\), there exist virtual indices \(\beta \) and \(\alpha \) such that \((R_4)_{\beta ,\alpha }\ne 0\). These are the indices selected before the sector factorization in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1431–1437 ] .
In the grouped vertical decomposition, put
and identify the bond space of each copy with that of its chosen representative. Then
Writing \(c_{\alpha ,q}=\nu _{\alpha ,q}\zeta _{\alpha ,q}{\gt}0\), the normalized maps satisfy
and retain the literal reconstruction
These are the normalized sector identities in [ CPGSV16 , Proposition 4.13, lines 1895–1921 ] .
Let \(M\) be an MPO tensor and let \(c\in \mathbb C\) be nonzero. For every chain length \(N\), the normalized density operators agree:
with the inverse of zero understood to be zero.
Suppose that every active product corner has positive gauge–phase coefficient and that its gauge Gram matrix is a positive scalar multiple of the identity. Given the trace-ratio unitary correspondence between the one-site and two-site vertical sectors, there are positive diagonal matrices \(\chi _{\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma }\) and coisometries \(U_{\alpha ,\beta }\) satisfying the forward fusion identity and exact reconstruction for every product tensor \(M_\alpha M_\beta \). This is the active-corner construction in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.4, lines 2020–2029 ] .
Scope restriction (active product BNT): Only active product corners occur. A label absent from a fixed product pair has zero fusion multiplicity. See [ con26c ] .
Local fix (Figure-11 fixed-pair support): A fixed product pair may have no active corner, and no unsupported sector is inserted. See [ con26q ] .
Local fix (Figure-11 fusion coisometry): The retained-row map is a coisometry onto the active direct sum, and its adjoint gives the exact reconstruction. See [ con26j ] .
Let \(V:\mathbb {C}^d\to \mathbb {C}^e\) satisfy \(V^*V=I\), and let \(K^V\) be obtained from an MPO tensor \(K\) by conjugating each physical matrix by \(V\). The normalized periodic operators satisfy
Suppose that the doubled-index tensor has the horizontal BNT representation \(S\), the copy weights over each representative agree, the physical-trace transfers \(\mathcal B_j=\sum _iA_j^{ii}\) are not nilpotent, and the original tensor satisfies SAL. After identifying length-three configurations with ordered triples, the normalized three-site marginal of the four-site state is the family closure
where
Every \(\widehat R_j\) is nonzero. More generally, a tail of length \(L\) gives \(\widehat R_j=\operatorname{tr}(\rho ^{(L+3)})^{-1}q_j\mathcal B_j^L\). This is the normalized traced-tail expansion used in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1714–1732 ] .
Let \(A_c^q\in M_{D_c}(\mathbb {C})\) be a finite labelled tensor family. If the one-letter tuples \(q\longmapsto (A_c^q)_c\) span the full product algebra \(\prod _c M_{D_c}(\mathbb {C})\), then there are coefficients \(C_{(c,x,y),q}\) such that
For an MPO tensor the letter is the ket–bra pair \(q=(i,k)\), so the same coefficients form the common block-letter left inverse used in [ BMW\(^{+}\)17 , lines 269–277 ] . The full product-algebra span is obtained after the common blocking described in [ BMW\(^{+}\)17 , lines 427–431 ] .
After identifying one blocked physical index with two original indices, \((K^{[2]})_1(X)=K_2(X)\).
Let the active product corners be covered by blocked BNT representatives, let the blocked representatives be identified with the original BNT by the trace-ratio unitary conjugacies, and suppose that the active gauge–phase coefficients are positive. If \(X_j^\dagger X_j=\omega _j\mathbb {1}\) with \(\omega _j{\gt}0\), then every retained copy pair has an original-label corner family. Its coefficient at an active corner is
which is positive. The normalized inclusions are isometries with pairwise orthogonal ranges, intertwine the raw product tensor with these positive multiples of the original BNT representatives, and reconstruct every raw product letter exactly.
Local fix (Figure-11 fixed-pair support): Empty active families remain empty. Exact weighted reconstruction and positivity of the outer copy weight imply that the corresponding raw product vanishes. See [ con26q ] .
Given an original-label corner family, choose the distinguished retained copy of every BNT label. For fixed labels \(\alpha ,\beta \), let the multiplicity of \(\gamma \) be the number of active corners of the distinguished copy pair whose original label is \(\gamma \), and put the corresponding positive corner coefficients on the diagonal of \(\chi _{\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma }\). The block row of the adjoints of the corner inclusions, regrouped by these label fibers, defines a fusion coisometry. It satisfies
together with the exact reconstruction
Empty label fibers contribute zero-dimensional diagonal blocks. This is the decomposition of CPSV16, Appendix C.4, lines 2020–2029.
Scope restriction (active product BNT): Only active product corners are retained. A label absent from the distinguished copy pair has zero fusion multiplicity. See [ con26c ] .
Local fix (Figure-11 fixed-pair support): The distinguished copy pair may have an empty active family; no unsupported corner is inserted. See [ con26q ] .
Local fix (Figure-11 fusion coisometry): The retained-row map is a coisometry onto the active direct sum. Exact reconstruction includes any common zero corner discarded by the forward map. See [ con26j ] .
Let \(K_x\) be a nonempty finite family of injective tensors generating MPDOs. Suppose that there are pairwise orthogonal one-site projections \(P_x\) and fixed translation-invariant positive commuting bonds \(B^{(x)}\), supported on \(P_x\otimes P_x\), whose periodic products equal \(\rho ^{(N)}(K_x)\) for every \(N\geq 2\). Suppose also that every \(K_x\) has source zero correlation length. Let \(n_x\) be positive natural numbers and suppose that, for every \(N{\gt}0\),
Then \(M\) satisfies SAL.
Suppose that \(\{ K_x\} _{x=0}^{g-1}\) has an orthogonally supported family of commuting sector products and that, for every \(N\geq 2\),
Then \(M\) has the explicit GSNNCH sector form with outer sectors \(x\) and natural multiplicities \(n_x\).
Let \({\cal K}\) be an MPO tensor with a physical-sector factorization and sector weights \(p_k\), such that every neighboring operator is positive semidefinite and the left tensor of every zero-weight sector vanishes. Then, for \(N\geq 1\),
This is a project derivation completing the first step of the Case-I route toward [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, Lemma C.5, lines 1473–1499 ] ; it is not a statement of that source.
Let \(\eta _{k,h}\) be the neighboring operators of a physical-sector factorization, and define
Then
Suppose that, for every fixed pair \((k,h)\), there is either a trace-preserving linear map from the four-site middle algebra to the two-site middle algebra which sends \(\Theta _{k,h}\) to \(\eta _{k,h}\), or a trace-preserving linear map in the reverse direction which sends \(\eta _{k,h}\) to \(\Theta _{k,h}\). If the same direction is chosen for all pairs, then
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.FourSiteMiddleIndex
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.fourSiteNeighboringOperator
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.neighboringTraceMatrix
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.neighboringTraceMatrix_apply
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.trace_fourSiteNeighboringOperator
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.neighboringTraceMatrix_eq_pow_three_of_pairwise_coarsening
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.neighboringTraceMatrix_eq_pow_three_of_pairwise_refinement
Let \(M\) be in normalized BNT-refined horizontal form and generate positive semidefinite operators on every nonempty chain. Suppose two vertical corners are positive scalar multiples of similarities of the same tensor \(A\):
Then the two Gram conjugations agree for every vertical letter,
Normality of \(A\) is not required for this equality; it enters only in the subsequent proportionality of the Gram matrices. This is the pairwise conclusion of Figures 7–8 in [ CPGSV16 , Proposition 4.13, lines 1909–1919 ] .
Scope restriction (BNT-refined horizontal form): the normalized BNT-refined horizontal hypothesis is stronger than the literal CPSV canonical-form hypothesis.
Let \(N\geq 3\). For every site \(i\in \mathbb {Z}/N\mathbb {Z}\), including \(i=N-1\), the adjacent translates of the physical bond commute:
This is the periodic-chain form of the adjacent-bond calculation in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, Proposition C.8, lines 1571–1593 ] . The case \(N=2\) is treated separately below, because its two translated bonds have the same support with opposite cyclic order.
Let \(M\) be an MPO tensor of operator bond dimension \(D\), and let \(N=L+K\). Opening the two virtual bonds at the consecutive cut gives
and
For left-block words \(x,x'\) and right-block words \(y,y'\), the factors are
and
This is the identity \(\operatorname{tr}(AB)=\sum _{a,b}A_{ab}B_{ba}\), with the normalization scalar absorbed into the left factor. The algebraic decomposition does not use positivity. Since \(0^{-1}=0\), it also remains valid when the trace vanishes; a nonzero trace is needed only to interpret \(\sigma ^{(N)}_{L:K}\) as the normalized physical state.
This is the two-virtual-boundary algebraic step toward the finite mutual-information estimate in [ CPGSV16 , Proposition 4.5 ] . It does not by itself prove \(I_L\leq 4\log D\): such a conclusion would require an entropy bound in terms of the operator-Schmidt rank.
Let \(N\geq 2\), and suppose that the cyclic bonds beginning at \(i\) and \(j\) have disjoint two-site supports. Then their physical bond operators commute: \((B_{\mathrm{physical}})_{i,i+1} (B_{\mathrm{physical}})_{j,j+1} =(B_{\mathrm{physical}})_{j,j+1} (B_{\mathrm{physical}})_{i,i+1}\). This is the locality part of the pairwise commutation assertion in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, Proposition C.8, lines 1571–1593 ] .
Suppose that the physical-sector factorization is given. For every periodic chain of length \(N\geq 2\) and every pair of sites \(i,j\in \mathbb {Z}/N\mathbb {Z}\), the corresponding translates of the physical bond commute:
This is the pairwise commutation assertion in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, Proposition C.8, lines 1571–1593 ] , conditional here on the physical-sector factorization constructed in the preceding results.
Under the canonical right-associated identification of four-site configurations with quadruples of physical indices,
The two translates of the physical bond on three sites commute:
This is the adjacent-bond calculation in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, Proposition C.8, lines 1589–1593 ] .
Under the physical-sector factorization \(F\) of the preceding theorem, for every \(N\geq 2\) there is a real number \(c{\gt}0\) such that \(\rho _N=c\, B_0B_1\cdots B_{N-1}\). Here the bonds are the canonical bonds determined by \(F\), and one may take \(c=1\). No positivity hypothesis on the neighboring operators \(\eta _{k,h}\) is required.
Suppose that the physical-sector factorization is given. For every \(N\geq 1\), the physically transformed MPO is block diagonal in the cyclic sector configurations, and
This is the all-length algebraic decomposition in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1435–1450 ] , conditional here on the displayed physical-sector factorization. It does not assert positivity of the individual neighboring operators.
Suppose that two MPO tensors of the same virtual dimension differ by an invertible virtual gauge \(X\). The induced factorization is precisely the virtual-matrix transport by \(X\) and \(X^{-1}\). Thus every physical-sector factorization of the first tensor induces one of the second tensor with the same physical decomposition and the same neighboring operators. In particular, positive semidefiniteness of all neighboring operators is invariant under the gauge.
The neighboring operators of the factorization obtained by virtual compression satisfy
No positivity of the right-hand side is asserted. This identity combines the virtual corner in [ CPGSV16 , Section 2.3, lines 195–219 ] with the neighboring contraction in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1441–1450 ] .
The neighboring operators of the transported factorization satisfy
This identity combines the virtual corner in [ CPGSV16 , Section 2.3, lines 195–219 ] with the neighboring contraction in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1441–1450 ] .
Let \(\mathcal K\) have positive bond dimension and be injective, and let \(F\) be a physical-sector factorization of \(\mathcal K\). Suppose every neighboring operator \(\eta ^F_{q,h}\) is positive semidefinite. If the physical-trace transfer of \(\mathcal K\) has source zero correlation length, then \(\mathcal K\) saturates the area law.
Vertex rephasing transforms the neighboring operators by \(\eta _{k,h}\longmapsto z_k^{-1}z_h\, \eta _{k,h}\). It leaves every sector virtual matrix unchanged, preserves the nonzero neighboring support, and leaves every complete cyclic product of neighboring operators unchanged. These are the rephasing identities used in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1434–1450 ] .
The map \(\mathcal S_1\) is trace-preserving and completely positive.
Assume the neighboring-operator trace factorization of Definition 20.15.3.32. For every virtual matrix \(X\), in the canonical physical-sector coordinates selected by the isometry \(U\), the coarse-graining channel satisfies
The normalized density is positive semidefinite and has trace one on every active pair. The density chosen on an inactive pair is positive definite and has trace one. Hence \(\overline\Omega _{k,h}\) is positive semidefinite with trace one for every pair, and agrees with \(\widehat\Omega _{k,h}\) on active pairs. The corresponding sectorwise and controlled maps prepare these densities on their diagonal summands.
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.normalizedThreeSiteNeighboringDensity_pos
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.trace_normalizedThreeSiteNeighboringDensity
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.inactiveThreeSiteNeighboringDensity_posDef
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.inactiveThreeSiteNeighboringDensity_trace
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.completedThreeSiteNeighboringDensity_pos
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.trace_completedThreeSiteNeighboringDensity
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.completedThreeSiteNeighboringDensity_eq_normalized
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.completedThreeSitePreparationMap_eq_normalized
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.completedThreeSiteControlledMap_sameBlock_apply
Each completed preparation is trace-preserving and completely positive. The same holds for their orthogonally controlled direct sum.
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.completedThreeSitePreparationMap_isKrausCPTP
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.completedThreeSiteControlledMap_isKrausCPTP
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.t1Map_isKrausCPTP
Assume the neighboring-operator trace factorization of Definition 20.15.3.32. For every virtual matrix \(X\), in the canonical physical-sector coordinates selected by the isometry \(U\), the refinement channel satisfies
This is the refinement half of Proposition C.7 [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1510–1516 and 1522–1545 ] .
The sector set and every middle-subspin space are nonempty. Each \(\Omega _{k,h}\) is positive semidefinite, and \(a_kb_h=0\) implies \(\Omega _{k,h}=0\).
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.sector_nonempty
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.threeSiteMiddleIndex_nonempty
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.threeSiteNeighboringOperator_pos
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.threeSiteNeighboringOperator_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero
Assume the neighboring-operator trace factorization of Definition 20.15.3.32. Then, for every outer-sector pair \((k,h)\),
This is the normalization used in the coarse-graining channel of [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2 ] , lines 1547–1555.
Let \(K=V K_P V^*\) be a physical support restriction of an MPO tensor satisfying SAL. Proposition C.8 applied to the injective tensor \(K_P\) gives a positive two-site bond \(B_P\) whose cyclic translates commute pairwise on every periodic chain of length \(N\geq 2\). Its lift \(B=V^{\otimes 2}B_P(V^{\otimes 2})^*\) is positive, its cyclic translates commute pairwise on every such ambient chain, and \((P\otimes P)B(P\otimes P)=B\). Moreover, for every \(N\geq 2\) one has the exact identity
Suppose that \(\eta _{k,h}\) is positive semidefinite for every pair of sectors. Then \(B_{\mathrm{physical}}\) is positive semidefinite, both with pair indices and with two-site configuration indices.
On the periodic chain of length two, the translates beginning at sites zero and one read the physical sites in the opposite cyclic orders \((0,1)\) and \((1,0)\). Nevertheless they commute: \(B_{01}B_{10}=B_{10}B_{01}\). This is the length-two instance of the translated-bond commutativity in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, Proposition C.8 ] . The source does not discuss the crossed finite-size ordering separately.
Under the canonical identification of two-site configurations with ordered pairs, the translates beginning at sites zero and one are respectively \(B_{01}=B_{\mathrm{physical}}\) and \(B_{10}=S B_{\mathrm{physical}}S^{-1}\), where \(S(x\otimes y)=y\otimes x\) exchanges the two physical factors.
Suppose that every neighboring operator \(\eta _{k,h}\) is positive semidefinite. Then the physical bond is positive semidefinite and all of its cyclic translates commute on every periodic chain of length at least two. Thus it determines a single translation-invariant positive bond datum. This assertion does not include the product formula for the finite-chain density operator.
Every sector operator of length \(N\geq 2\) in a proportionally realized orthogonal commuting sector family is positive semidefinite. Consequently, if the one-site operator \(\rho ^{(1)}(K_x)\) is positive semidefinite for every sector \(x\), then every \(K_x\) generates matrix product density operators at all positive lengths.
Let \(\{ K_x\} _{x=0}^{g-1}\) be a nonempty finite family of MPO tensors, let \(n_x\) be positive natural numbers, and let \(P_x\) be pairwise orthogonal one-site projections. Suppose that, for every \(N{\gt}0\), there is a number \(c_N{\gt}0\) such that
For \(N\geq 2\) and \(1\leq L\leq N\), write \(\widehat\rho _{x,N,L}\) for the normalized marginal of \(\rho ^{(N)}(K_x)\) on the first \(L\) sites. Assume that
If every \(K_x\) satisfies SAL, then \(M\) satisfies SAL.
Let \(\{ K_x\} _{x=0}^{g-1}\) have a proportionally realized orthogonal commuting sector family with one-site projections \(P_x\) and two-site bonds \(B^{(x)}\). Then, for every sector \(x\), every \(N\geq 2\), and every \(1\leq L\leq N\),
Let \(\{ K_x\} _{x=0}^{g-1}\) have a proportionally realized orthogonal commuting sector family with one-site projections \(P_x\) and two-site bonds \(B^{(x)}\). Then, for every sector \(x\) and every \(N\geq 2\),
Let \(K_x\) be a nonempty finite family with a proportionally realized orthogonal commuting sector family, and let \(n_x\) be positive natural numbers. Suppose that, for every \(N{\gt}0\), there is a number \(c_N{\gt}0\) such that
If every \(K_x\) satisfies SAL, then \(M\) satisfies SAL.
Let \(K_x\) be a nonempty finite family of injective tensors generating MPDOs. Suppose that there are pairwise orthogonal one-site projections \(P_x\) and fixed translation-invariant positive commuting bonds \(B^{(x)}\), supported on \(P_x\otimes P_x\). For every sector \(x\) and every \(N\geq 2\), suppose that there is a number \(a_{x,N}{\gt}0\) such that
Suppose also that every \(K_x\) has source zero correlation length. Let \(n_x\) be positive natural numbers and suppose that, for every \(N{\gt}0\), there is a number \(c_N{\gt}0\) such that
Then \(M\) satisfies SAL.
Let \(u=(i_1,i_2,i_3)\) and \(v=(j_1,j_2,j_3)\) be physical words of length three. The corresponding entry of the first-three-site marginal of the normalized four-site periodic operator is
Let \(V:\mathbb {C}^d\to \mathbb {C}^e\) be an isometry, and let \(K^V\) be obtained from an MPO tensor \(K\) by conjugating each physical matrix by \(V\). For every \(0\leq L\leq N\), the contiguous reduced states satisfy
Let \((\eta _{k,h})_{k,h}\) be the neighboring operators of the zero-weight-reparameterized inverse-map factorization, after a coherent sector rephasing, and let \((p_k)_k\) be its Hayashi weights. If \(p_k=0\) or \(p_h=0\), then
The reparameterization makes the right tensor of an inactive source sector zero, while its left tensor is already zero. Thus this is a statement about the retained reparameterized and rephased witness, not about the raw inverse-map factorization.
Let \(\{ \mathcal K_x\} _{x=0}^{g-1}\) be injective MPO tensors and let \(\{ P_x\} _{x=0}^{g-1}\) be pairwise orthogonal projections. Suppose that every physical slice is absorbed on both sides:
Write \(\mathcal K_x=V_x\mathcal K_{x,P_x}V_x^*\) for the restriction to the range of \(P_x\). If every \(\mathcal K_{x,P_x}\) admits a physical-sector factorization whose neighboring operators are positive semidefinite, then there are positive bonds \(B^{(x)}\) such that
and all translates of each \(B^{(x)}\) commute pairwise. For every \(N\geq 2\),
Thus these bonds form an orthogonally supported family of commuting sector products.
Enumerate the dependent family of active corners by a single finite label set. The resulting coefficients are positive, the blocks are normal, and the inclusion ranges are pairwise orthogonal. For every tensor letter,
Each compression \(W_j^\dagger C^iW_j\) is \(\lambda _jA_j^i\), and \(C\) has the same positive-length closed chains as the finite direct sum \(\bigoplus _j\lambda _jA_j\).
- MPOTensor.retainedVerticalProductTensor_eq_sum_pairBlocks
- MPOTensor.retainedProductBlockInclusion_orthogonal_of_ne
- MPOTensor.RetainedProductSpectralFamily.retainedInclusion_orthogonal_of_ne
- MPOTensor.RetainedProductSpectralFamily.retained_compression
- MPOTensor.RetainedProductSpectralFamily.retained_reconstruction_active
- MPOTensor.RetainedProductSpectralFamily.flatDim
- MPOTensor.RetainedProductSpectralFamily.flatCoefficient
- MPOTensor.RetainedProductSpectralFamily.flatBlock
- MPOTensor.RetainedProductSpectralFamily.flatInclusion
- MPOTensor.RetainedProductSpectralFamily.flatDim_pos
- MPOTensor.RetainedProductSpectralFamily.flatCoefficient_pos
- MPOTensor.RetainedProductSpectralFamily.flatCoefficient_ne
- MPOTensor.RetainedProductSpectralFamily.flatBlock_normal
- MPOTensor.RetainedProductSpectralFamily.flatInclusion_isometry
- MPOTensor.RetainedProductSpectralFamily.flatInclusion_orthogonal_of_ne
- MPOTensor.RetainedProductSpectralFamily.flat_intertwine
- MPOTensor.RetainedProductSpectralFamily.flat_intertwine_adjoint
- MPOTensor.RetainedProductSpectralFamily.flat_compression
- MPOTensor.RetainedProductSpectralFamily.flat_reconstruction
- MPOTensor.RetainedProductSpectralFamily.flat_sameMPV₂Pos
Suppose that the one-site vertical tensor has the stated exact coisometric reconstruction, that \(M\) is in normalized BNT-refined horizontal form, and that \(M\) generates positive operators. Then simultaneous retained-product spectral data exist. In copy coordinates, the assembled vertical tensor is the direct sum of the weighted simple blocks. The canonical inclusion of each copy is an isometry, intertwines in both directions, and its compression selects exactly that weighted block. Likewise, the canonical inclusion of a copy pair, followed by its local corner isometry, is an isometry into the retained product bond space and intertwines in both directions. Composing once more with the adjoint of the squared vertical coisometry gives an isometry into the bond space of the blocked vertical tensor. Under the exact coisometric reconstruction, these ambient inclusions intertwine each active weighted corner with the blocked vertical tensor in both directions. In particular, if \(J_j\) is the ambient inclusion of an active corner, then \(J_j^\dagger \mathcal V(M^{(2)})^iJ_j=\lambda _jA_j^i\). These explicit composite inclusions retain the range projections required for the sector-weight comparison.
- MPOTensor.verticalCopyCoordinateEquiv
- MPOTensor.verticalCopyCoordinateEquiv_symm_apply
- MPOTensor.verticalAssembledTensor_reindex_copyCoordinates
- MPOTensor.verticalCopyBlockInclusion
- MPOTensor.verticalCopyBlockInclusion_isometry
- MPOTensor.verticalAssembledTensor_mul_verticalCopyBlockInclusion
- MPOTensor.verticalCopyBlockInclusion_conjTranspose_mul_verticalAssembledTensor
- MPOTensor.verticalCopyBlockInclusion_compression
- MPOTensor.retainedProductBlockInclusion_isometry
- MPOTensor.retainedVerticalProductTensor_mul_retainedProductBlockInclusion
- MPOTensor.retainedProductBlockInclusion_conjTranspose_mul_retainedVerticalProductTensor
- MPOTensor.exists_retainedProductSpectralFamily
- MPOTensor.RetainedProductSpectralFamily.retainedInclusion
- MPOTensor.RetainedProductSpectralFamily.ambientInclusion
- MPOTensor.RetainedProductSpectralFamily.retainedInclusion_isometry
- MPOTensor.RetainedProductSpectralFamily.retained_intertwine
- MPOTensor.RetainedProductSpectralFamily.retained_intertwine_adjoint
- MPOTensor.RetainedProductSpectralFamily.ambientInclusion_isometry
- MPOTensor.RetainedProductSpectralFamily.ambient_intertwine
- MPOTensor.RetainedProductSpectralFamily.ambient_intertwine_adjoint
- MPOTensor.RetainedProductSpectralFamily.ambient_compression
Suppose that the vertical reading of \(M\) is reconstructed from a retained tensor \(A\) by a coisometry \(U\). The two-site blocking is then reconstructed from the product of two copies of \(A\) by the Kronecker square of \(U\). Moreover, if \(M\) is in normalized BNT-refined horizontal form and generates positive operators, this retained product tensor has invariant-projector closure and has no nontrivial periodic vectors. No full-support assumption is imposed on the retained bond space.
- MPOTensor.verticalCoisometrySquare
- MPOTensor.verticalCoisometrySquare_isCoisometry
- MPOTensor.verticalTensor_blockTwo_squared_coisometry_reconstruction
- MPSTensor.projectorClosure_and_noPeriodicVectors_of_coisometry_reconstruction
- MPOTensor.retainedVerticalProduct_projectorClosure_and_noPeriodicVectors
Let \(M\) generate positive semidefinite ring operators with \(\operatorname{tr}[\rho ^{(N)}(M)]\neq 0\) for every \(N\geq 1\). If \(M\) satisfies the local renormalization fixed-point equations of Definition 4.1, then \(M\) saturates the area law: \(I_L(M)=I_{L+1}(M)\) whenever \(1\leq L{\lt}\lfloor N/2\rfloor \). Nonvanishing is the normalization boundary implicit in the density-operator language of [ CPGSV16 ] . Positive semidefiniteness alone admits the zero family.
Let \(M\) generate positive semidefinite ring operators with \(\operatorname{tr}[\rho ^{(N)}(M)]\neq 0\) for every \(N\geq 1\). If \(M\) satisfies the local renormalization fixed-point equations of Definition 4.1, then \(\mathcal T_M^2=\mathcal T_M\) and \(M\) saturates the area law. This is the literal ZCL and SAL forward implication proved in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C, lines 1333–1341 ] , at the normalization boundary implicit in its density-operator language. Positive semidefiniteness alone admits the zero family.
Let \(M\) be a renormalization fixed point. If its \(N\)-site operator is positive semidefinite and has nonzero trace, then \(I(\sigma ^{(N)}_{a+1:b+2}) =I(\sigma ^{(N)}_{a+2:b+1})\). This is the channel calculation in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C, lines 1333–1341 ] . It depends only on positivity, nonzero trace, and the local renormalization equations; no horizontal decomposition enters the calculation.
Suppose that a tensor \(K\) has trace-preserving completely positive maps \(S,T\) satisfying
for every virtual matrix \(X\). Then the two-site physical blocking \(K^{[2]}\) has maps satisfying the same two identities and is therefore a renormalization fixed point.
The map \(\mathcal S_0\) is trace-preserving and completely positive.
The shift \(\mathcal S_2\) is trace-preserving and completely positive.
Let \(K\) be a simple tensor in block-injective canonical form which satisfies ZCL and SAL. For the representatives \(\mathcal K_i\) of its BNT, there are orthogonal projectors \(P_s\) such that
This is the separating-projector lemma in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1626–1691 ] .
Let \(K\) be simple, in biCF, and satisfy SAL. Assume in addition that the common blocking has been performed, the copy weights over each BNT representative agree, and the representatives have a simultaneous one-site span. There is a distinguished BNT label \(s_0\) such that the completed projectors are orthogonal and, for distinct labels \(s\) and \(t\),
For every physical slice of the \(i\)-th BNT representative, whenever \(s\ne t\) or \(i\ne s\),
This is the copy-independent-weight specialization of the separating-projector lemma in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1680–1737 ] .
- MPOTensor.completedBntSectorProjection_isOrthogonal
- MPOTensor.completedBntSectorProjection_mul_eq_zero
- MPOTensor.sum_completedBntSectorProjection
- MPOTensor.completedBntSectorProjection_mul_physicalSlice_mul_eq_zero
- MPOTensor.exists_bntSeparatingProjectors_of_sameMPV₂Pos_isSAL_of_weight_copy_independent
Let \(V:\mathbb {C}^d\to \mathbb {C}^e\) be an isometry, and let \(K^V\) be obtained from an MPO tensor \(K\) by conjugating each physical matrix by \(V\). For every \(N\geq 1\),
If the periodic operators of \(K^V\) are positive semidefinite, then those of \(K\) are positive semidefinite. Their mutual informations agree at every contiguous cut. Consequently, if \(K^V\) satisfies saturation of the area law, then so does \(K\).
Let \(1\leq m\leq \lfloor N/2\rfloor \), and divide the chain into four consecutive regions \(A,B,C,D\) of lengths \(m-1,1,N-m-1,1\). If the tensor saturates the area law, then its marginal on \(ABC\) satisfies \(S(ABC)+S(B)=S(AB)+S(BC)\). Indeed, this is the entropy form of \(I_1=I_m\). Taking \(m=2\) gives the regions of lengths \(1,1,N-3\), and then taking \(N=4\) shows that the three-site reduced state of the four-site chain satisfies equality in strong subadditivity.
Conversely, suppose the tensor generates positive semidefinite periodic operators and their traces are nonzero at every positive chain length. If the displayed equality holds for every \(N\) and every \(1\leq m\leq \lfloor N/2\rfloor \), then the tensor saturates the area law. This is the choice of regions used in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1760–1780 ] . The endpoint corrects the strict inequality printed at source line 1771: Definition 4.6 and the concluding comparison both require \(m=\lfloor N/2\rfloor \). This local correction is recorded in [ con26t ] .
Let \(K\) satisfy the strong area law and let \(N\geq 4\). If \(\sigma _3^{(N)}(K)\) is obtained from the normalized \(N\)-site periodic state by tracing out all but its first three sites, then \(\sigma _3^{(N)}(K)\) admits a quantum Markov decomposition on its middle site. This is the three-site marginal result proved in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1351–1371 ] . The decomposition may depend on \(N\).
Let \(K\) be a simple tensor in block-injective canonical form (biCF), equipped with a basis-of-normal-tensors decomposition and satisfying the strong area law and literal zero correlation length,
Let \(M=K^{[2]}\) be its two-site blocking. Then there are trace-preserving completely positive maps in both directions between the one-site and two-site closures of \(M\). Equivalently, \(M\) is a renormalization fixed point via these two maps. This is implication (ii)\(\Rightarrow \)(v) of [ CPGSV16 , Theorem 4.9 and Appendix C.2, lines 1810–1825 ] . The separate standing biCF and BNT hypotheses are imposed at lines 849–850 and restated at line 1628 of the same source. The source first uses zero correlation length at lines 1646–1665 to make repeated-copy weights independent of the copy label and absorbs their common value into each representative. The proof at lines 1815–1816 then projects onto the mutually orthogonal outer physical sectors and invokes the one-representative channel construction. Thus a faithful proof must supply one blocked channel pair for every absorbed representative. Their combination through the outer physical projections, including the trace-preserving completion outside their sum, is Theorem 20.15.7.46. Given one neighboring trace factorization for every absorbed representative, the complete composition down to the blocked channel pair for \(M\) is Theorem 20.15.7.47. The remaining step is therefore the existence of these per-representative factorizations under the strong area law and zero correlation length.
Let \(K\) be a simple tensor in block-injective canonical form (biCF), with BNT representatives \(A_s\) and canonical coefficients \(\mu _{s,q}\). Suppose that \(K\) generates positive semidefinite periodic operators, satisfies the strong area law, and has literal zero correlation length,
Then \(\mu _{s,q}\) is independent of \(q\) for each fixed \(s\). Absorb this common value into \(A_s\) and write \(\mathcal K_s=\mu _sA_s\). The tensors \(\mathcal K_s\) have mutually orthogonal physical supports and each generates positive semidefinite periodic operators. For every \(s\), there is a physical-sector factorization
whose neighboring operators \(\eta ^{(s)}_{k,h}\) are positive semidefinite. There are real families \((a_{s,k})_k,(b_{s,k})_k\) satisfying
This is implication (ii)\(\Rightarrow \)(iv) of [ CPGSV16 , Theorem 4.9 and Appendix C.2, lines 1740–1782 ] . The separate standing biCF and BNT hypotheses are imposed at line 849 and restated at line 1628 of the same source.
There are tensors \(K,A\) of physical dimension four and virtual dimension two, and a scalar \(\mu \) with \(0{\lt}|\mu |{\lt}1\), such that \(K=\mu A\), the tensor \(A\) is normal, and \(K\) is injective, satisfies the strong area law, and obeys
Nevertheless, no physical-sector factorization of \(K\) has positive neighboring operators whose traces are of the form \(a_kb_h\) with \(\sum _k a_kb_k=1\). Hence these local analytic hypotheses do not by themselves imply the asserted factorization. This does not refute the all-sector assertion in [ CPGSV16 , Theorem 4.9 and Appendix C.2, lines 1647–1782 ] , whose hypotheses include an ambient simple tensor in biCF and its canonical reconstruction.
- MPOTensor.NonCartesianActiveSectorCandidate.transferMap_posDef_eigenvalue_lt_one
- MPOTensor.NonCartesianActiveSectorCandidate.transferMap_posDef_eigenvalue_le_one
- MPOTensor.NonCartesianActiveSectorCandidate.exists_normalTensor_scalar_representation
- MPOTensor.NonCartesianActiveSectorCandidate.full_lowLevel_counterexample
There is an injective matrix product density operator tensor satisfying the strong area law and source zero correlation length whose source-selected inverse-map factorization has positive semidefinite neighboring operators and a primitive trace-one active trace matrix \(T\), but for which there are no families \(a,b\) satisfying \(T_{k,h}=a_kb_h\) for all \(k,h\). Equivalently, for the corresponding closed sector tensors \(L,Q\), one has \(Q(1-LQ)L=T-T^2\ne 0\). Thus the rank-one conclusion in Lemma C.5 fails for this raw representative. The normal-tensor hypothesis imposed in Case I at source lines 1374–1381 is not included in this statement.
- MPOTensor.ActiveSectorSpanningCounterexample.tensor_isSAL
- MPOTensor.ActiveSectorSpanningCounterexample.physTraceTransfer_tensor_idempotent
- MPOTensor.ActiveSectorSpanningCounterexample.activeSectorTraceMatrix_not_rankOne
- MPOTensor.ActiveSectorSpanningCounterexample.tensor_has_sal_sourceZCL_and_non_rankOne_activeTraceMatrix
- MPOTensor.ActiveSectorSpanningCounterexample.rectangular_remainder_eq_mul_sub_sq
More generally, suppose that, for some \(\lambda {\gt}0\), the nonzero physical-trace transfer satisfies
Under the same canonical-form and non-nilpotency conditions, the weights remain independent of the copy index. This scale-invariant statement is distinct from the literal fixed-representative assertion of Theorem 20.15.1.2.
Under the same sector factorization hypothesis, for every \(N\geq 1\),
This is the algebraic sector decomposition in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1446–1450 ] . It does not assert that the individual neighboring operators are positive.
Let \(t=(t_0,\ldots ,t_m)\) be a nonempty sector word. For functions \(a\) on the left coordinate of \(t_0\) and \(b\) on the right coordinate of \(t_m\),
For every virtual matrix \(X\),
Similarly,
and summing the scalar coefficient over \(l\) gives \(a_kb_h\).
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.partialTraceRight_twoSiteSectorClosure
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.partialTraceRight_twoSiteSectorClosure
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.partialTraceRight_threeSiteSectorClosure
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.NeighboringTraceFactorization.sum_threeSite_trace_coefficients
Under the hypotheses of Definition 20.15.6.1, the trace matrix of the explicit \(\eta \)-data is the pairing of the closed sector tensors:
Let \({\cal K}\) be an injective MPDO with the chosen Hayashi decomposition and a nonzero tail entry. Then for all sectors \(k,h\):
\(\eta _{k,k}\ge 0\);
\(\eta _{k,h}\otimes \eta _{h,k}\ge 0\);
if \(\eta _{k,h}\ne 0\) and \(\eta _{h,k}\ne 0\), there is a scalar \(c\ne 0\) with \(c\, \eta _{k,h}\ge 0\), \(c^{-1}\eta _{h,k}\ge 0\), and \((c\, \eta _{k,h})\otimes (c^{-1}\eta _{h,k})=\eta _{k,h}\otimes \eta _{h,k}\).
Suppose that \(\mathcal K\) is injective, \(\rho \) is its three-site closure against \(R\), a Hayashi decomposition of \(\rho \) has been chosen, and the outer indices satisfy \(R_{\beta _3,\alpha _1}\ne 0\). Then for all virtual indices \(\beta _1,\alpha _3\),
The direct sum refers to the physical indices and is inherited from the splitting of the middle site. This is the factorization displayed at [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1435–1448 ] .
For sector tensors paired into \(T\) as in Definition 20.15.6.60, the operator \(M=\sum _k|l_k)(r_k|\) satisfies \(M^2=M\). If in addition the vectors \(|l_0),\ldots ,|l_{n-1})\) are linearly independent, then \(T^2=T\).
For sector tensors paired into \(T\) as in Definition 20.15.6.60, without any independence hypothesis on the closed sector tensors or the functionals, one has \(T^2=T^3\), and, for every positive integer \(N\), \(\operatorname{tr}(T^N)=\operatorname{tr}(T)\).
For a physical-sector factorization, let \(A_{k;x,y}\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be the virtual matrix obtained from the physical matrix entry \((x,y)\) within sector \(k\). Suppose that all such matrices span \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) and that both endpoint sectors of every nonzero neighboring operator contain a nonzero matrix of this form. Then every nonzero \(\eta _{k,h}\) admits a two-edge return: there is a sector \(j\) for which
In particular, the nonzero neighboring support is recurrent.
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.sectorVirtualMatrix_mul_apply
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.sectorVirtualMatrix_mul_eq_zero_of_neighboringOperator_eq_zero
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.exists_two_edge_return_of_neighboringOperator_ne_zero_of_endpoints
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.exists_two_edge_return_of_neighboringOperator_ne_zero
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.neighboringOperator_reaches_of_ne_zero
Suppose the sector trace matrix \(T\) of Definition 20.15.6.60 is primitive. Then every closed sector tensor satisfies \(|l_k)\neq 0\). If, in addition, each \(|l_k)\) lies in its own member of an independent family of subspaces of \(V\), then the vectors \(|l_0),\ldots ,|l_{n-1})\) are linearly independent.
Let \({\cal K}\) be an injective tensor that generates MPDOs and satisfies SAL, and choose the positive semidefinite neighboring operators of Theorem 20.15.6.12. Restrict the sector index to the positive-weight summands of the Hayashi decomposition. Then positive semidefiniteness makes every neighboring trace real and non-negative, and the matrix
is primitive. Zero-weight summands remain in the physical direct sum but are not indices of \(T^*\).
Let \({\cal K}\) be injective and let
be a physical-sector factorization. Then the virtual matrices \(A_{k;x,y}\) obtained from all within-sector physical entries span the full virtual matrix algebra \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\).
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.changePhysicalBasis_inverse_apply_eq_sum
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.sectorCoordinateMatrixFamily_span_eq_top
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.sectorCoordinateTensor_mem_span_sectorVirtualMatrixFamily
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.sectorVirtualMatrixFamily_span_eq_top
Let \(M\) generate an MPDO, let \(Q\) and \(P\) be sector projectors for the weights \(\mu _{\alpha ,0}\) and \(\mu _{\alpha ,k}\) and a common matrix \(E_\alpha \), and suppose \(\mu _{\alpha ,0}{\gt}0\). If the compression of \(H^{(N+1)}\) by \(P\) at the first site is nonzero, then
Granted such sector projectors, this yields the conclusion of the trace argument in the proof of [ CPGSV16 , Proposition 4.13 ] : since w.l.o.g. \(\mu _{\alpha ,0}{\gt}0\), the positive trace forces \(d_\alpha {\gt}0\) and hence \(\mu _{\alpha ,k}{\gt}0\).
Under the hypotheses of the preceding theorem, define \(M_n(a,b)=L_n(a)R_n(b)\). Then
Let \(K\) have an eta-local structure and source zero correlation length, and let \(C\) be the selected fixed-product tensor in its physical-sector coordinates. For every \(L{\gt}0\), the normalized \(L\)-site reduced states of \(C\) obtained from chain lengths \(L+2\) and \(L+1\) are equal.
Let \(K\) be an injective tensor with an eta-local structure. Let \(C\) be the exact fixed-product tensor selected from its commuting bond, and let \(F\) be the associated positive physical-sector factorization. Then any two sectors in the positive-length cyclic support of \(F\) are joined by a directed path of nonzero neighboring operators.
- MPOTensor.EtaLocalStructureData.exists_positive_scalar_mpo_changePhysicalBasis_eq_smul_selected
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.changePhysicalBasis_physicalCoordinateMatrix_isInjective
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.trace_sectorCoordinateTensor_mul_eq_zero_of_not_isCyclicActiveSector
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.changePhysicalBasis_apply_ne_eq_zero_of_mpo_two_eq_smul
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.changePhysicalBasis_apply_eq_zero_of_not_isCyclicActiveSector
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.changePhysicalBasis_mul_eq_zero_of_neighboringOperator_eq_zero
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.retainedBulkProduct
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.exists_retainedBulkProduct_diag_ne_zero_of_neighboringOperator_ne_zero
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.exists_cyclicNeighboringProduct_diag_ne_zero_of_neighboringOperator_ne_zero
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.exists_retainedBulkProduct_diag_ne_zero_of_isCyclicActiveSector
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.exists_cyclicNeighboringProduct_diag_ne_zero_of_isCyclicActiveSector
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.exists_changePhysicalBasis_apply_ne_zero_of_isCyclicActiveSector
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.CyclicActiveOriginalEntryIndex
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.cyclicActiveOriginalOneSiteMatrixFamily
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.cyclicActiveOriginalOneSiteMatrixFamily_span_eq_top
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.cyclicActive_reflTransGen_neighboringOperator_ne_zero_of_closed_mpo
- MPOTensor.EtaLocalStructureData.selectedFixedProduct_cyclicActive_reflTransGen_neighboringOperator_ne_zero
Let \(K\) be an injective tensor with an eta-local structure and source zero correlation length. Express \(K\) in the one-site physical coordinates of the positive fixed-product factorization selected by the eta-local structure. For arbitrary \(A,C\geq 0\), the normalized marginal on consecutive regions of lengths \(A\), \(1\), and \(C\), obtained from the periodic chain of length \(A+C+2\), admits a Hayashi Markov decomposition.
Let \(K\) have an eta-local structure, let \(F\) be the positive physical-sector factorization of its selected fixed-product tensor, and express \(K\) in the physical coordinates of \(F\). For every \(N\geq 2\) and \(L\leq N\), the selected sector-coordinate tensor and the transformed source tensor have the same normalized \(L\)-site reduced state.
Let \(K\) be an injective tensor with an eta-local structure and source zero correlation length. Let \(F\) be the positive physical-sector factorization of the selected fixed-product tensor, and let \(T_C\) be its trace matrix on cyclic-active sectors. There is a number \(\lambda {\gt}0\) such that
Let a tensor satisfying the literal zero-correlation-length equation be gauge-equivalent, through block-diagonal copy gauges, to an assembled sector decomposition whose basis elements all have non-nilpotent physical-trace transfer. Then the weights do not depend on the copy index: \(\mu _{j,q}=\mu _{j}\) [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1646–1661 ] .
Let \(M\) have source zero correlation length. For every \(L\geq 0\), the normalized \(L\)-site marginal obtained by tracing three sites from \(\sigma ^{(L+3)}(M)\) equals the normalized \(L\)-site marginal obtained by tracing one site from \(\sigma ^{(L+1)}(M)\).
Let \(M\) generate matrix product density operators and have source zero correlation length. Then, for every \(N\geq 1\), \(\operatorname{tr}(\sigma ^{(N)}(M)){\gt}0\). In particular, after a common blocking has made the simultaneous BNT word span full at one letter, the absorbed BNT elements selected in Theorem 20.15.2.31 have a well-defined normalized state at every physical chain length. This is the biCF hypothesis imposed at the start of Case II in the source; its relation with finite physical blocking is recorded in [ con26u ] . This supplies the strict form of the sector normalization used in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1760–1780 ] .
Fix witnesses \(P\) and \(U\) in (10). For every \(N\geq 0\) and every virtual matrix \(X\), write \(R_1\) and \(R_2\) for the initial-coordinate regroupings of lengths \(N+1\) and \(N+2\). Then
Equivalently, applying \(R_2^{-1}\) to the right-hand side gives the \((N+2)\)-site closure in its original physical coordinates. The same formula with \(M_k(X)\) replaced by the ordinary periodic operator \(\rho ^{(k)}(M)\) holds after closing the virtual indices with the identity.
Fix witnesses \(P\geq 0\) and \(U\) for the strong fixed-point relation. For every \(N\geq 0\), the ordinary full periodic MPO matrix ranks satisfy
Consequently every strong fixed point admits a single positive witness \(P\) whose matrix rank is the factor in both formulas. No normalization of \(P\) and no positivity or normalization assumption on the periodic operators is required.
For fixed matrices \(P\) and \(U\), the tensor identity (9) holds if and only if every virtual matrix \(X\) satisfies
Hence the strong renormalization fixed-point relation is equivalent to the existence of \(P\geq 0\) and a two-site unitary \(U\) satisfying (10) for every \(X\).
Let \(\widetilde{\mathcal K}\) be the tensor in physical-sector coordinates. For \(L\geq 0\) and \(R\geq 1\), the normalized \(L\)-site marginal obtained from a chain of length \(L+R\) satisfies
In particular, this identity holds for \(R=1\), \(R=2\), and \(R=3\).
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.reindex_reducedBlockState_add_eq_suffixSectorContraction
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.reindex_reducedBlockState_add_one_eq_oneSuffixSectorContraction
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.reindex_reducedBlockState_add_two_eq_twoSuffixSectorContraction
- MPOTensor.PhysicalSectorFactorization.reindex_reducedBlockState_add_three_eq_threeSuffixSectorContraction
The map \(\mathcal T_0\) is trace-preserving and completely positive.
For every two-site matrix \(Y\), outer-sector pair \((k,h)\), and boundary indices \(a,b\),
The shift \(\mathcal T_2\) is trace-preserving and completely positive.
Let \(\mathcal S:\operatorname{End}_{\mathbb {C}}(H)\to \operatorname{End}_{\mathbb {C}}(K)\) be trace-preserving and completely positive, and let \(R\) be another finite-dimensional space. Then
are trace-preserving and completely positive.
There is a one-letter matrix product density operator \(K\) whose BNT canonical presentation has one scalar normal representative \(A=1\) and two copies with raw weights
The presentation satisfies the global unit-weight normalization, \(K\) generates positive semidefinite operators at every positive length, and the physical-trace transfer of \(A\) is nonnilpotent. Thus \(K\) satisfies the simplicity clause. The singleton BNT family has simultaneous one-letter span, so the presentation is in biCF. Moreover, \(A\) itself generates matrix product density operators, the distinct-layer equation in condition (iv) holds, and \(A\) has a physical-sector factorization with positive neighboring operator and normalized rank-one trace coefficients. Its two-site blocking also generates matrix product density operators. Nevertheless,
Consequently the literal implication (iv)\(\Rightarrow \)(v) printed in [ CPGSV16 , Theorem 4.9 ] is false.
Under the canonical identification of three-site configurations with \(H\otimes (H\otimes H)\), the translates of the physical bond beginning at sites \(0\) and \(1\) are respectively \((B_{\mathrm{physical}})_{01}=B_{01}\) and \((B_{\mathrm{physical}})_{12}=B_{12}\).
Let \(S\) be a square matrix with entries in a commutative semiring, indexed by a finite set \(I\), and let \(N\geq 1\). Then
with indices read modulo \(N\), the sum over labelings \(k\) of the \(N\) cyclic positions of the product of matrix entries along the cycle. Applied to the trace-squared matrix \(S^*\) of Lemma 20.15.6.25, this is the combinatorial identity used to express the self-overlap \(O_{{\cal K}^{\mathrm{MPS}}{\cal K}^{\mathrm{MPS}}}(N)\) in terms of \(\operatorname{tr}\! \left((S^*)^N\right)\).
Let \(I\) be a finite index set, let \(S\in \mathbb R^{I\times I}\), and let \(v\in \mathbb R^I\) satisfy \(v_i{\gt}0\) for every \(i\in I\). Put
Then, for every \(N\geq 0\),
This project lemma isolates the diagonal-conjugation calculation used in the Case-I argument. It is not a separately stated result of [ CPGSV16 ] .
Let \(\mathcal K\) be an injective tensor generating MPDOs. Suppose that there is one positive two-site bond \(B\) whose translates commute and, for every \(N\geq 2\), a constant \(c_N{\gt}0\) such that
If the physical-trace transfer of \(\mathcal K\) has zero correlation length, then \(\mathcal K\) saturates the area law.
This is the proposition at [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.2, lines 1597–1619 ] .
Under the one-site and two-site vertical basis-of-normal-tensors decompositions and the two completely positive, trace-preserving physical-closure transport identities, assume that the one-site tensor is in normalized BNT-refined horizontal form and defines a matrix product density operator. Then there are positive diagonal multiplicity matrices \(\chi _{\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma }\) and matrices \(U_{\alpha ,\beta }\) such that every diagonal entry is positive and
while the exact reconstruction is
This is the positive fusion decomposition of CPSV16, Appendix C.4, lines 2020–2029.
Scope restriction (active product BNT): Only active product corners occur. A label absent from a fixed product pair has zero fusion multiplicity. See [ con26c ] .
Local fix (Figure-11 fixed-pair support): A fixed product pair may have no active corner, and no unsupported sector is inserted. See [ con26q ] .
Local fix (Figure-11 fusion coisometry): The retained-row map is a coisometry onto the active direct sum, and its adjoint gives the exact reconstruction. See [ con26j ] .
Under the hypotheses and with the notation of Theorem 20.14.80, let \(\mu _\alpha \) and \(\nu _\beta \) be the positive diagonal multiplicity matrices in the one-site and two-site vertical canonical forms, and set \(m_\alpha =\operatorname{tr}(\mu _\alpha )\) and \(n_\beta =\operatorname{tr}(\nu _\beta )\). For every horizontal bond matrix \(X\) and every sector \(\alpha \),
Consequently, for every tensor letter \(a\),
This is the coefficient identity in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.4, lines 2001–2008 ] . It compares the traces of the multiplicity matrices; it does not assert equality of their dimensions or of their individual diagonal entries.
Under precisely the hypotheses of Theorem 20.14.71, the transported maps satisfy
Thus \(\widetilde T\) and \(\widetilde S\) are mutually inverse. This is the identity-composition conclusion of [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.4, lines 1974–1995 ] .
Under the hypotheses of Theorem 20.14.71, the maps
are completely positive. The trace adjoints of the two square composites satisfy the Schwarz inequality in every simple summand.
Suppose that every one-site and two-site multiplicity space is nonzero and every corresponding diagonal weight is positive. Let \(\widetilde M^{(1)}\) and \(\widetilde M^{(2)}\) be the vertical tensors of \(M\) and its two-site blocking, and let \(B_1\) and \(B_2\) be their assembled one-site and two-site canonical forms. Assume that both canonical forms are bases of normal tensors and that, for every vertical letter \(\ell \),
Assume in addition that the physical maps \(T\) and \(S\) are completely positive and trace preserving and that, for every horizontal bond matrix \(Z\), the two physical-coordinate identities hold:
Then each transported map and both square composites preserve the appropriate total sector trace. For the individual maps,
For the square composites,
Neither of the stronger range inclusions is assumed:
Suppose that every multiplicity space for \(\mu _\alpha \) and \(\nu _\beta \) is nonzero, every diagonal entry of these two matrices is positive, and
Writing \(m_\alpha =\operatorname{tr}(\mu _\alpha )\) and \(n_\beta =\operatorname{tr}(\nu _\beta )\), one has
In particular, take \(X_\alpha =M_\alpha (X)\) and \(Y_\beta =A_\beta (X)\) from the contractions of the one-site and two-site vertical canonical forms. The physical closure identities for \(T\) and \(S\) then imply the two hypotheses above, so the same conclusions hold for these source-generated sector operators.
Suppose that the multiplicity spaces are nonzero, their diagonal weights are positive, the physical maps \(T\) and \(S\) are completely positive and trace preserving, and the vertical coordinate maps satisfy \(U_iU_i^\dagger =1\). Then \(\widetilde T\) and \(\widetilde S\) preserve pointwise positive semidefiniteness. For pointwise positive families \(X\in \mathcal A_1\) and \(Y\in \mathcal A_2\), their total sector traces obey
The trace loss vanishes precisely when
respectively.
This result concerns positivity and trace on positive elements. It does not assert a complete-positivity structure for the finite products, a trace-preserving extension to their full ambient matrix spaces, or an inverse relation between the two transported maps.
Under the hypotheses of Theorem 20.14.79, write
There are an equivalence \(\sigma \) of the two sector index sets, equalities \(D^{(1)}_\alpha =D^{(2)}_{\sigma (\alpha )}\), and unitaries \(V_\alpha \in M_{D^{(2)}_{\sigma (\alpha )}}(\mathbb {C})\) such that
where the nonzero entry on the right is in position \(\sigma (\alpha )\), and
where the entries on the left and right are in positions \(\sigma (\alpha )\) and \(\alpha \), respectively. These identities hold for every \(X\in M_{D^{(1)}_\alpha }(\mathbb {C})\) and \(Y\in M_{D^{(2)}_{\sigma (\alpha )}}(\mathbb {C})\). Here \(\iota _\alpha \) is the reindexing induced by the displayed dimension equality. These are the mutually inverse unitary formulas of [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.4, line 1997 ] . They make no assertion about the multiplicities, weights, or coefficient identity at lines 2001–2008.
Let the \(N\)-site operator generated by \(M\) be positive semidefinite, and let three consecutive regions have lengths \(a\), \(b\), and \(c\), with \(a+b+c\leq N\). After reindexing the reduced state of the first \(a+b+c\) sites as a tripartite state on \(A\otimes B\otimes C\), its four entropies in strong subadditivity are
Suppose that \((M_\alpha )_\alpha \) is a basis of normal tensors, every multiplicity space is nonzero, and every diagonal entry of \(\mu _\alpha \) is positive. Then there is a positive integer \(L\) such that \(C_L(V_m)=\prod _\alpha M_{d_\alpha }=:\mathcal A_1\). This is the spanning assertion used in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.4, lines 1980–1990 ] .
Let \(K\) be an MPO tensor in normalized BNT-refined horizontal form that generates matrix product density operators. Then both \(K\) and \(K^{[2]}\) satisfy the vertical canonical-form conditions of Definition 17.4.6. This is the initial canonical-form step in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.4, lines 1951–1956 ] .
For a bond matrix \(X\), write \(\mathcal M^{(1)}(X)\) and \(\mathcal M^{(2)}(X)\) for the one-site and two-site physical closures, respectively, and write
for the contracted one-site and two-site vertical canonical forms. If
then
These are the physical-coordinate identities which, after composition with \(R_1,R_2,\widetilde R_1,\widetilde R_2\), give the two displayed identities for \(\widetilde T\) and \(\widetilde S\) in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.4, lines 1955–1979 ] .
Let \(M\) generate matrix product density operators, and suppose that its doubled-index MPS tensor is in literal CPSV canonical form. Then the vertically viewed tensor \(\widetilde M\) has no nontrivial periodic vectors.
Let \(M\) be in normalized BNT-refined horizontal form, generate matrix product density operators, and satisfy the renormalization fixed-point condition of Definition 20.2.1. Then one may choose a vertical basis of normal tensors \(\{ M_\alpha \} _\alpha \) for which there are positive diagonal matrices \(\chi _{\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma }\) and matrices \(U_{\alpha ,\beta }\). Every diagonal entry of \(\chi _{\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma }\) is positive, and
Thus the renormalization fixed-point and matrix-product-density-operator assumptions, together with normalized BNT-refined horizontal form, imply the positive fusion decomposition of CPSV16, Appendix C.4, lines 2020–2029.
Scope restriction (active product BNT): Only active product corners occur. A label absent from a fixed product pair has zero fusion multiplicity. See [ con26c ] .
Local fix (Figure-11 fixed-pair support): A fixed product pair may have no active corner, and no unsupported sector is inserted. See [ con26q ] .
Local fix (Figure-11 fusion coisometry): The retained-row map is a coisometry onto the active direct sum, and its adjoint gives the exact reconstruction. See [ con26j ] .
Let \(M\) generate matrix product density operators, and suppose that its doubled-index MPS tensor is in literal CPSV canonical form. If an orthogonal projection \(P\) satisfies \(P\widetilde M_v=P\widetilde M_vP\) for every vertical letter \(v\), then
for every \(v\). Thus the vertically viewed tensor has invariant-projector closure.
Let \((d_\alpha )_\alpha \) and \((r_\alpha )_\alpha \) be finite families of dimensions with \(r_\alpha {\gt}0\), and suppose that every diagonal entry of \(\mu _\alpha \) is positive. Then the normalized embedding
is a direct-sum Kraus map. Without any condition on the multiplicities, the map
is a direct-sum Kraus map. Its restriction to the weighted sectors is the retraction in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.4, lines 1961–1970 ] .
There is a tensor of bond dimension two with four one-dimensional physical sectors and weights \(p_k\) such that the following statements hold simultaneously: the tensor is injective and has source zero correlation length; its physical-trace transfer is idempotent; for every \(k\in \{ 0,1,2,3\} \), the weights satisfy
its sector virtual matrices span \(M_{2}(\mathbb {C})\); every neighboring operator is positive semidefinite; and its active trace matrix is primitive and has trace one. Nevertheless, if \(S=LQ\) is the physical-trace transfer and \(T=QL\) is the active trace matrix, then \(Q(1-S)L=T-T^2\ne 0\). In particular, full virtual-matrix spanning does not by itself imply that the active trace matrix is idempotent.
- MPOTensor.ActiveSectorSpanningCounterexample.virtual_spanning_does_not_force_rectangular_remainder_zero
- MPOTensor.ActiveSectorSpanningCounterexample.physTraceTransfer_tensor
- MPOTensor.ActiveSectorSpanningCounterexample.reindex_activeSectorTraceMatrix
- MPOTensor.ActiveSectorSpanningCounterexample.factorization
In the retained coordinates, the product tensor is the orthogonal direct sum over ordered pairs of BNT copies. Its summand indexed by \(((\alpha ,q),(\beta ,r))\) is \(\mu _{\alpha ,q}\mu _{\beta ,r}(M_\alpha M_\beta )\). Every such summand has invariant-projector closure and has no nontrivial periodic vectors. This includes zero-dimensional summands and requires no nonvanishing assumption on the displayed scalar.
For every ordered pair of retained BNT copies, the weighted product tensor has an exact orthogonal decomposition into positive multiples of normal tensors. The corresponding corner isometries are retained, intertwine in both directions, and reconstruct every tensor letter. The active family is allowed to be empty; in particular, no normal block is introduced for a zero-dimensional or identically zero copy-pair tensor.
The neighboring operators of the reparameterized factorization are
Thus a zero-weight sector has no outgoing support edge. Since \(p_h=0\) also gives \(l_h=0\), it has no incoming support edge either.
Let \(D\geq 1\), and let \(W\) be a real diagonal coefficient matrix across a periodic cut of an MPO with bond dimension \(D\). Suppose its scalar extension to \(\mathbb {C}\) is the cut matrix \(P^{\mathbb {C}}\) from Theorem 20.7.38. If \(Z{\gt}0\) and \(P=Z^{-1}W\) is a joint probability distribution, then \(I(X:Y)_P\leq 2\log D\).
Split a periodic chain into consecutive blocks of lengths \(L\) and \(R\). For words \(x\in \{ 0,\ldots ,d-1\} ^L\) and \(y\in \{ 0,\ldots ,d-1\} ^R\), set
Then the ordinary complex rank of \(P\) satisfies \(\operatorname{rank}_{\mathbb {C}}P\le D^2\).
Let \(D\geq 1\). Suppose that \(\rho ^{(L+R)}(M)\) is diagonal and positive semidefinite, and that \(Z{\gt}0\). Then \(W_{x,y}\geq 0\), the scalar extension of \(W\) to \(\mathbb {C}\) is the diagonal cut matrix of Theorem 20.7.38, and \(\widehat P\) is a joint probability distribution. Its classical mutual information satisfies \(I(X:Y)_{\widehat P}\leq 2\log D\).
Let \(M\) be the ancilla contraction of a purifying spin–ancilla tensor \(A\) through a bond identification \(e\), so that
Then at every length \(N\) the matrix product operator equals the ancillary trace of the pure spin–ancilla matrix product state, \(\rho ^{(N)}(M)=\rho ^{(N)}_p(A)\). This is the coefficient form of the purification equation of [ CPGSV16 , line 751 ] .
An MPO tensor is a nondegenerate purification renormalization fixed point if and only if it is a local purification density operator (Definition 17.3.2) and
This is the normalized, nonzero structural characterization used in the forward PRFP-to-ZCL implication of [ CPGSV16 , lines 744–786 ] .
There is an MPO tensor which is an MPDO, satisfies the positive-length global purification RFP predicate, and has nonzero physical-trace transfer, but does not satisfy the nonzero up-to-scalar physical-trace relation.
Let \(A\) and \(B\) be normal tensors of positive, possibly different, bond dimensions. Suppose that, for all sufficiently large \(N\), their matrix product vectors are proportional by a nonzero scalar. Then there is \(a\in \mathbb {C}\), with \(|a|=1\), such that \(|V^{(N)}(A)\rangle =a^N|V^{(N)}(B)\rangle \) for every positive \(N\). This is the one-normal-block consequence of [ CPGSV16 , Corollary A.3 and the proof of Theorem 2.10 ] .
Let \(M_\alpha \) be a normal tensor. Any matrix commuting with every matrix of \(M_\alpha \) is a scalar multiple of the identity. In particular, if \(X\ne 0\) and \(X^\dagger X\) commutes with every matrix of \(M_\alpha \), then \(X^\dagger X=\omega \mathbb {1}\) for a necessarily positive constant \(\omega \), and \(\omega ^{-1/2}X\) is unitary. This is the normalized form \(X_{\alpha ,k}^\dagger X_{\alpha ,k}=\omega _{\alpha ,k}\mathbb {1}\) of the Gram-matrix proportionality in the proof of [ CPGSV16 , Proposition 4.13 ] , with \(X_{\alpha ,0}=\mathbb {1}\) and \(U_{\alpha ,k}=\omega _{\alpha ,k}^{-1/2}X_{\alpha ,k}\). Deriving the commutation from self-adjointness of the sector compressions is a separate step.
Let \(T\) be a sector trace matrix with \(\operatorname{tr}(T)=1\), paired from sector tensors satisfying the zero-correlation-length identity of Definition 20.15.6.60. If the closed sector tensors \(|l_0),\ldots ,|l_{n-1})\) are linearly independent, then there are real numbers \(a_k,b_h\) such that
The same conclusion holds if, instead of the independence, \(T\) is primitive and the closed sector tensors lie in distinct members of an independent family of subspaces. In contrast with the positive-semidefinite criterion of Theorem 20.15.6.59, the constant trace powers are derived rather than assumed.
Fix \(L\geq 1\). For every \(N{\gt}L\), the tensor in Definition 20.7.10 satisfies
Consequently the sequence \(K\mapsto I_L^{(L+K+1)}\) does not converge, giving the counterexample described in [ CPGSV16 , Proposition 4.5, lines 801–806 ] .
- MPOTensor.ThermodynamicLimitCounterexample.normalizedMPO_parityTensor_of_odd
- MPOTensor.ThermodynamicLimitCounterexample.normalizedMPO_parityTensor_of_even
- MPOTensor.ThermodynamicLimitCounterexample.reducedBlockState_parityTensor_of_odd
- MPOTensor.ThermodynamicLimitCounterexample.reducedBlockState_parityTensor_of_even
- MPOTensor.ThermodynamicLimitCounterexample.blockEntropy_parityTensor_of_odd
- MPOTensor.ThermodynamicLimitCounterexample.blockEntropy_parityTensor_of_even
- MPOTensor.ThermodynamicLimitCounterexample.mutualInfoChain_parityTensor_of_odd
- MPOTensor.ThermodynamicLimitCounterexample.mutualInfoChain_parityTensor_of_even
- MPOTensor.ThermodynamicLimitCounterexample.binEntropy_one_div_three_pos
- MPOTensor.ThermodynamicLimitCounterexample.parityMutualInfoAfterCut
- MPOTensor.ThermodynamicLimitCounterexample.not_exists_tendsto_parityMutualInfoAfterCut
The tensor in Definition 20.7.10 generates the positive operators
Their traces are \(2+(-1)^N\). The all-zero diagonal entry of the normalized one-site reduced state is therefore one for odd \(N\) and \(1/3\) for positive even \(N\). In particular, the normalized periodic one-site reduced states do not converge as \(N\to \infty \).
Thus normalized periodic marginals need not converge under the hypotheses of [ CPGSV16 , Proposition 4.5, lines 801–806 ] . The mutual information of this same family is computed in [ con26b ] .
- MPOTensor.ThermodynamicLimitCounterexample.mpo_parityTensor_eq_diagonal
- MPOTensor.ThermodynamicLimitCounterexample.parityTensor_isMPDO
- MPOTensor.ThermodynamicLimitCounterexample.trace_mpo_parityTensor
- MPOTensor.ThermodynamicLimitCounterexample.normalizedMPO_zeroConfig_of_odd
- MPOTensor.ThermodynamicLimitCounterexample.normalizedMPO_zeroConfig_of_even
- MPOTensor.ThermodynamicLimitCounterexample.reducedBlockState_one_zero_zero_of_odd
- MPOTensor.ThermodynamicLimitCounterexample.reducedBlockState_one_zero_zero_of_even
- MPOTensor.ThermodynamicLimitCounterexample.not_exists_tendsto_reducedBlockState_one_zero_zero
Under the canonical identifications of one-site configurations with physical indices and two-site configurations with pairs of physical indices,
If an MPO tensor \(M\) is the ancilla contraction of a pure-state renormalization fixed point, then its physical-trace transfer \(\mathcal T_M=\sum _i M^{ii}\) is idempotent: \(\mathcal T_M\mathcal T_M=\mathcal T_M\).
Let \(\rho _{ABC}\) be a trace-one operator, and let \(X_{AB}\) and \(Y_{BC}\) be positive semidefinite operators. Suppose that their natural lifts to \(ABC\) commute and that, after the natural reassociation of the three tensor factors,
Then \(\rho _{ABC}\) admits a quantum Markov decomposition on \(B\).
Let \(\mathcal A=\bigoplus _{\alpha \in I}\mathcal M_{d_\alpha \times d_\alpha }\) be a finite sum of full matrix algebras, with total trace \(\operatorname{tr}_{\mathcal A}(X)=\sum _{\alpha \in I}\operatorname{tr}(X_\alpha )\). Let \(F:\mathcal A\to \mathcal A\) be positive and trace nonincreasing. Suppose that \(F(V_j)=V_j\) for every \(j\in J\). With \(\mathcal V=\operatorname{span}_{\mathbb {C}}\{ V_j:j\in J\} \), put
If \(\mathbf1_{\mathcal A}\in C_L(\mathcal V)\) for some \(L{\gt}0\), then \(F\) preserves the total trace on \(\mathcal A\).
Let \(\mathcal M\) be a finite full matrix algebra over \(\mathbb C\), and let \(F:\mathcal M\to \mathcal M\) be positive and trace nonincreasing. Suppose that a family \((V_j)_{j\in J}\) consists of fixed points of \(F\) and that, for some \(L{\gt}0\), the identity belongs to the linear span of the products \(V_{j_1}\cdots V_{j_L}\) in \(\mathcal M\). Then \(F\) has a positive-definite fixed point. This is the local full-matrix intermediate implication used in [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.4, lines 1980–1995 ] ; it is not stated there as a separate theorem.
Let \(\mathcal M\) be a finite full matrix algebra over \(\mathbb C\), and let \(F:\mathcal M\to \mathcal M\) be positive and trace nonincreasing. Suppose that \(F(V_j)=V_j\) for every \(j\in J\). Put \(\mathcal V=\operatorname{span}_{\mathbb {C}}\{ V_j:j\in J\} \) and, in the notation of [ CPGSV16 , Appendix C.4 ] , define
If \(\mathbf1\in C_L(\mathcal V)\) for some \(L{\gt}0\), then \(F\) is trace preserving.
Let \(M\ne 0\). If \(c_1,c_2\ne 0\) and both \(c_1M\) and \(c_2M\) are positive semidefinite, then \(c_1=t c_2\) for some positive real number \(t\). Every complex scalar of unit modulus is nonzero. In particular, every nonzero scalar \(c\) has a unit-modulus part \(u=c/|c|\), positivity of \(cM\) implies positivity of \(uM\), and there is at most one such unit scalar when \(M\ne 0\).
Suppose \(A\) has invariant-projector closure and no nontrivial \(p\)-periodic vectors. Then there are normal tensors \(A_1,\ldots ,A_r\) of positive bond dimensions \(D_1,\ldots ,D_r\), with \(\sum _kD_k\le D\), and nonzero weights \(\mu _1,\ldots ,\mu _r\) such that
Moreover, there are isometries \(V_k:\mathbb {C}^{D_k}\to \mathbb {C}^D\) with pairwise orthogonal ranges such that
This is the sufficient condition for canonical form of [ CPGSV16 , Section 2 ] , with that paper’s convention \(\sum _kD_k\le D\) allowing zero blocks: a corner of \(A\) carrying the zero tensor cannot be rescaled to spectral radius one and is omitted because it vanishes at every positive length.
Let \(T\) be a finite real square matrix. Assume that \(T\) is primitive, positive semidefinite, normalized by \(\operatorname{tr}(T)=1\), and has constant traces on all positive powers. Then \(T=ab^\top \) for some vectors \(a\) and \(b\), with \(a\cdot b=1\).
Let \(A=(A^i)_{i=0}^{d-1}\) be an MPS tensor, and let \(M(A)^{ij}=A^i\otimes \overline{A^j}\) be its doubled MPO tensor. Then
More explicitly, if \(V\colon \mathbb {C}^d\to \mathbb {C}^{d^2}\) is the blocking isometry, the refinement channel has the orientation
If \(d{\gt}0\), put \(P=VV^\dagger \) and choose a density matrix \(\rho _0\) on the one-site space. A trace-preserving coarse-graining channel is
On the range of \(V\), the second term vanishes and this agrees with the source construction \(\mathcal S(Y)=\operatorname{tr}_2(U^\dagger YU)\) after extending \(V\) to a unitary with a fixed pure ancilla. If \(d=0\), both matrix spaces are trivial and the unique zero maps give \(\mathcal S\) and \(\mathcal T\). This is the pure-state specialization stated at [ CPGSV16 , line 668, labels Def-equiv-pure and T-and-S-mixed-equiv-pure, lines 675–687 ] .
Suppose that \(M\) is the ancillary contraction of a fixed spin–ancilla tensor \(A\) through a bond identification \(e\):
Then the purification tensor \(\widehat A\) is a pure-state renormalization fixed point if and only if \(\mathcal T_M^2=\mathcal T_M\). This is the normalized tensor-level equivalence underlying the purification theorem in [ CPGSV16 , lines 744–786 ] .
Suppose that \(C\simeq C'\otimes E\) and
is a quantum Markov decomposition on \(B\). Then the marginal \(\rho _{ABC'}=\operatorname{tr}_E(\rho _{ABC})\) has the decomposition
If an MPS tensor \(A\) is a renormalization fixed point, then it saturates the area law: for every chain length \(N\) and every block length \(1\le L{\lt}\lfloor N/2\rfloor \), the pure-state block entropy is constant in the block size, \(S_L^{(N)}(A)=S_{L+1}^{(N)}(A)\). The source statement is [ CPGSV16 , Proposition 3.14, lines 606–608 ] . It assumes canonical form; the theorem above is the stronger pure-state implication obtained from transfer-map idempotence alone.
If an MPS tensor \(A\) is a renormalization fixed point, then all block entropies in the range \(1\le L\le \lfloor N/2\rfloor \) coincide:
This is the explicit constant-entropy chain of the area-law saturation [ CPGSV16 , Definition 3.13, line 600 ] , under the fixed-point hypothesis.
If \(M\) is a renormalization fixed point via trace-preserving maps, then \(\mathcal T_M^2=\mathcal T_M\). This proves the zero-correlation-length component of implication (i)\(\Rightarrow \)(ii) in [ CPGSV16 , Theorem 4.9, lines 851–893 ] . The corresponding calculation appears in the proposition “RFP implies ZCL and SAL” in Appendix C, lines 1333–1340; the part establishing saturation of the area law is separate.
Let \(M\) be the ancilla contraction of a pure-state renormalization fixed point, satisfying the local purification renormalization fixed point condition. If the physical-trace transfer \(\mathcal T_M=\sum _i M^{ii}\) is nonzero, then \(M\) satisfies the nonzero up-to-scalar physical-trace relation.
For every \(N\), the embedded MPO is diagonal with diagonal \(V^{(N)}(A)\), and hence
For an MPS tensor \(A\), the diagonal MPO embedding has idempotent transfer map if and only if the MPS transfer map is idempotent:
If \(A\) is injective, then \(\ker \Phi _A = \{ 0\} \).
A tensor in normalized BNT-refined horizontal form that generates matrix product density operators is also in canonical form in the vertical direction: there exist a basis of normal tensors \(\{ M_\alpha \} _\alpha \) for the vertically viewed tensor \(\widetilde M\), positive diagonal matrices \(\mu _\alpha \), and a coisometry \(U\) from the physical space onto the retained nonzero sectors. Writing \(B=\bigoplus _\alpha \mu _\alpha \otimes M_\alpha \), one has
The conclusion includes the basis-of-normal-tensors condition in [ CPGSV16 , Proposition 4.13 ] , together with the positive weights and the coisometric realization. Its hypothesis is the normalized BNT-refined form of Definition 17.4.1, rather than the literal CPSV canonical form assumed in Theorem 17.4.111.
Suppose that
and, for every letter \(v\) and every sector \(k\), \(T_vW_k=W_kB_k^v\). Then the block-row map \(U\) is a coisometry and conjugates \(T\) to the direct sum of the sector tensors:
If the letters also satisfy the literal sector decomposition
then
This last equality is a conditional consequence of (78); no additional assertion from the source is used.
The auxiliary conjunction \((\mathcal{E}_A^2=\mathcal{E}_A\ \text{and virtual-insertion distance independence})\) is equivalent to \(\mathcal{E}_A^2=\mathcal{E}_A\). This is a logical simplification of the auxiliary convention, not the physical ZCL theorem of [ CPGSV16 , Theorem 3.8 ] .