- Boxes
- definitions
- Ellipses
- theorems and lemmas
- Blue border
- the statement of this result is ready to be formalized; all prerequisites are done
- Orange border
- the statement of this result is not ready to be formalized; the blueprint needs more work
- Blue background
- the proof of this result is ready to be formalized; all prerequisites are done
- Green border
- the statement of this result is formalized
- Green background
- the proof of this result is formalized
- Dark green background
- the proof of this result and all its ancestors are formalized
- Dark green border
- this is in Mathlib
For \(s\in [0,1]\), \(t\in [0,1]\), and positive-definite matrices \(A_1,A_2,B_1,B_2\), the map \((A,B)\mapsto \Re \operatorname{tr}(A^s B^{1-s})\) is jointly concave:
Obtained from Theorem 7.7.13 by taking \(K=\mathbb {1}\).
For \(s\in [0,1]\), \(t\in [0,1]\), matrix \(K\), and positive-definite matrices \(A_1,A_2,B\), the map \(A\mapsto \Re \operatorname{tr}(K^\dagger A^s K B^{1-s})\) is concave:
For \(s\in [0,1]\), \(t\in [0,1]\), matrix \(K\), and positive-definite matrices \(A,B_1,B_2\), the map \(B\mapsto \Re \operatorname{tr}(K^\dagger A^s K B^{1-s})\) is concave:
The adjoint Kraus map is
When the \(\{ K_i\} \) are the matrices of an MPS tensor \(A\), this is the transfer map of the conjugate-transposed family \(i \mapsto (A^i)^\dagger \).
For a finite family of matrices \(\{ C_i\} _{i\in \iota }\) and a defect block \(S\), one forms an isometric dilation whose rows are the adjoints of the matrices \(C_i\) together with the adjoint of \(S\). One also forms the scalar block-diagonal matrix whose \(\iota \)-blocks carry prescribed weights and whose defect block carries a single scalar.
A Kraus map is trace-preserving if \(\sum _{i=0}^{d-1} K_i^\dagger K_i = \mathbb {1}\). Equivalently, the adjoint Kraus map is unital. This is the standard MPS normalization condition. In the later gauge language it is the left-canonical condition, so Kadison–Schwarz arguments are often applied to the adjoint map.
Let \(f:\mathbb {R}\to \mathbb {R}\) be convex on \([0,\infty )\), let \(A\) be a positive semidefinite matrix on a finite-dimensional space indexed by \(n\), and let \(v\in \mathbb {C}^n\) satisfy \(\langle v,v\rangle =1\). Then
where \(f(A)\) is defined by the Hermitian continuous functional calculus.
For positive-definite matrices \(A_1,A_2,B_1,B_2\), \(s\in (0,1)\), and \(\theta \in [0,1]\), with \(\hat{A}=A\otimes \mathbb {1}\) and \(\hat{B}=\mathbb {1}\otimes B^\top \), setting \(A_\theta =\theta A_1+(1-\theta )A_2\) and \(B_\theta =\theta B_1+(1-\theta )B_2\), the fractional product \(\hat A^s\hat B^{1-s}\) is jointly concave in the Loewner order:
For positive-definite matrices \(A\), \(B\) and \(s\in (0,1)\),
where \(A\otimes \mathbb {1}\) and \(\mathbb {1}\otimes B^\top \) are regarded as operators on the Kronecker model space \(\mathbb {C}^{D\times D}\).
Let \(T\) be a positive subunital map, let \(A\ge 0\), let \(p\in (0,1)\), and let \(t{\gt}0\). Then
Let \(T\) be a positive subunital map, let \(A\ge 0\), let \(p\in (1,2)\), and let \(t{\gt}0\). Then
The inequality is reversed relative to the concave integrand, since \(g_{p,t}\) is operator convex.
If the defect block satisfies
then the dilation is an isometry, and compressing the weighted scalar block-diagonal matrix gives \(\sum _{i\in \iota }w_iC_iC_i^\dagger +tSS^\dagger \). The defect relation can also be written as \(\sum _{i\in \iota }C_iC_i^\dagger +SS^\dagger =\mathbb {1}\). Strict positivity of all weights together with \(t{\gt}0\) implies positive definiteness of the scalar block-diagonal matrix. If all weights are nonzero and the defect scalar is nonzero, the inverse diagonal has reciprocal weights, and compressing this inverse gives \(\sum _{i\in \iota }w_i^{-1}C_iC_i^\dagger +t^{-1}SS^\dagger \).
Let \(w_i\ge 0\) and \(t{\gt}0\). If the defect block satisfies \(SS^\dagger =\mathbb {1}-\sum _{i\in \iota }C_iC_i^\dagger \), then
For positive-definite matrices \(X_1,X_2,Y_1,Y_2\) and \(\theta \in [0,1]\), the parallel sum \((X,Y)\mapsto X(X+Y)^{-1}Y\) is jointly concave in the Loewner order:
where \(X_\theta =\theta X_1+(1-\theta )X_2\) and \(Y_\theta =\theta Y_1+(1-\theta )Y_2\).
Fix \(t{\gt}0\) and positive-definite matrices with \(A_1\le A_2\) and \(B_1\le B_2\). The resolvent of the Kronecker model \(A\otimes \mathbb {1}+t\, (\mathbb {1}\otimes B^\top )\) of the commuting left- and right-multiplication superoperators is antitone:
For \(t{\gt}0\), positive-definite \(A_1,A_2,B_1,B_2\), and \(\theta \in [0,1]\), with \(\hat{A}=A\otimes \mathbb {1}\) and \(\hat{B}=\mathbb {1}\otimes B^\top \), setting \(A_\theta =\theta A_1+(1-\theta )A_2\) and \(B_\theta =\theta B_1+(1-\theta )B_2\):
Let \(E^*\) be the adjoint of a trace-preserving Kraus map. If \(A\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) admits a positive semidefinite dominant \(B\) commuting with \(A\) and satisfying \(A^\dagger A\le B\), then
Let \(E^*(X)=\sum _i K_i^\dagger X K_i\) be the adjoint Kraus map of a trace-preserving Kraus family, and let \(A\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be normal. Then the Schwarz gap
is positive semidefinite. Equivalently,
This is the completely positive case of [ Wol12 , Proposition 5.1 ] .
For \(s\in [0,1]\), any matrix \(K\), and positive-definite matrices \(A_1,A_2,B_1,B_2\), write \(F_s(A,B):=\Re \operatorname{tr}(K^\dagger A^s K B^{1-s})\). This map is jointly concave. For \(t\in [0,1]\), set \(A_t:=tA_1+(1-t)A_2\) and \(B_t:=tB_1+(1-t)B_2\). Then
See [ Lie73 ; And79 ] . This statement is the positive-definite, boundary-exponent (\(x+y=1\)) case of the Ando–Lieb theorem [ Wol12 , Theorem 5.15 ] , which holds for positive semidefinite \(A,B\) and all exponents \(x,y\ge 0\) with \(x+y\le 1\).
For \(s\in [0,1]\), any matrix \(K\), and positive-semidefinite matrices \(A_1,A_2,B_1,B_2\), the map \((A,B)\mapsto \Re \operatorname{tr}(K^\dagger A^s K B^{1-s})\) is jointly concave, satisfying (8) of Theorem 7.7.10. This is the full Ando–Lieb theorem [ Wol12 , Theorem 5.15 ] on the boundary line \(x+y=1\) (with \(x=s\), \(y=1-s\)): the positive-definiteness restriction of Theorem 7.7.10 is lifted. The general two-exponent region is obtained in Theorem 7.7.12.
Let \(x,y\ge 0\) with \(x+y\le 1\). For any matrix \(K\) and positive-semidefinite matrices \(A_1,A_2,B_1,B_2\), write \(F_{x,y}(A,B):=\Re \operatorname{tr}(K^\dagger A^x K B^y)\). This map is jointly concave. For \(t\in [0,1]\), set \(A_t:=tA_1+(1-t)A_2\) and \(B_t:=tB_1+(1-t)B_2\). Then
This is Wolf’s Theorem 5.15 in the finite-dimensional matrix setting.
For elements \(a,b\) of a unital C\({}^\ast \)-algebra with \(0\le a,b\), an exponent \(p\in [1,2]\), and \(t\in [0,1]\), the map \(a\mapsto a^p\) is convex for the Loewner order on the positive cone:
This is the convex counterpart of the operator concavity of \(x\mapsto x^p\) for exponents \(p\in [0,1]\).
For a positive unital map \(T\) and positive-definite \(A\), one has \(T(\log A)\le \log (T(A))\). This is the corrected logarithmic specialization associated with [ Wol12 , Corollary 5.2(3) ] . The printed common hypothesis \(T(\mathbb {1})\le \mathbb {1}\) is insufficient: in dimension one, for \(0{\lt}c{\lt}1\), the positive subunital map \(T(x)=cx\) and \(A=1\) would give \(0=T(\log A)\le \log (T(A))=\log c\). The corrected theorem instead assumes \(T(\mathbb {1})=\mathbb {1}\); see [ con26i ] .
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be a positive linear map with \(T(\mathbb {1})\le \mathbb {1}\). If \(A\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) admits a positive semidefinite dominant \(B\ge 0\) with \(A^\dagger A\le B\) and \(B\) commuting with \(A\) (\(BA=AB\)), then
This is [ Wol12 , Theorem 5.6 ] .
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be a positive linear map with \(T(\mathbb {1})\le \mathbb {1}\). If \(A\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) is normal, then \(T(A^\dagger A)-T(A^\dagger )T(A)\ge 0\). This is [ Wol12 , Proposition 5.1 ] .
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be a positive linear map with \(T(\mathbb {1})\le \mathbb {1}\). If \(A\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) is subnormal (i.e. there exists a normal operator on a larger space whose compression to \(\mathbb {C}^D\) is \(A\)), then \(T(A^\dagger A)-T(A^\dagger )T(A)\ge 0\). This is [ Wol12 , Theorem 5.5 ] .
For \(p\in [0,1]\), PSD matrices \(A_1,A_2\), and \(t\in [0,1]\),
This follows from operator concavity of \(x\mapsto x^p\) composed with trace monotonicity on the Loewner order.
For \(p\in [1,2]\), PSD matrices \(A_1,A_2\), and \(t\in [0,1]\),
This follows from operator convexity of \(x\mapsto x^p\) composed with trace monotonicity on the Loewner order.