- Boxes
- definitions
- Ellipses
- theorems and lemmas
- Blue border
- the statement of this result is ready to be formalized; all prerequisites are done
- Orange border
- the statement of this result is not ready to be formalized; the blueprint needs more work
- Blue background
- the proof of this result is ready to be formalized; all prerequisites are done
- Green border
- the statement of this result is formalized
- Green background
- the proof of this result is formalized
- Dark green background
- the proof of this result and all its ancestors are formalized
- Dark green border
- this is in Mathlib
For a complex-linear map \(E:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), set
These are [ Wol12 , Equations (5.11)–(5.12) ] , with the source’s convention that the subscript records the side on which \(A\) multiplies the varying matrix.
A complex-linear map \(E:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) satisfies the Schwarz inequality if, for every \(A\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\),
This is [ Wol12 , Equation (5.2) ] .
A linear map \(E : M_{D}(\mathbb {C}) \to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) is completely positive (CP) if it admits a Kraus representation: there exist operators \(\{ K_i\} _{i=0}^{r-1}\) with \(K_i \in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) such that, for every \(X \in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\),
The Kraus representation also gives entrywise positivity on every positive block matrix by Theorem 2.2.1, and hence the associated completely positive map between matrix \(C^*\)-algebras in Theorem 2.2.2.
For a fixed \(B\), the set \(\mathcal{A}_B\subseteq M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) of \(A\)’s for which equality is attained in the two-variable operator Schwarz inequality:
A complex-linear map \(E:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) and a fixed \(B\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) satisfy the per-\(B\) Schwarz hypothesis when
for every \(A\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\). A \(2\)-positive map satisfies this for every \(B\) (Theorem 6.9.2.5).
The adjoint Kraus map is
When the \(\{ K_i\} \) are the matrices of an MPS tensor \(A\), this is the transfer map of the conjugate-transposed family \(i \mapsto (A^i)^\dagger \).
Given operators \(\{ K_i\} _{i=0}^{d-1}\) with \(K_i \in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), the Kraus map is
A linear map is completely positive (Definition 2.1.5) if and only if it can be written in this form, as in (1).
For a Kraus map \(E\), define
We follow the convention that \(\mathcal{A}_R(E)\) controls right multiplication and \(\mathcal{A}_L(E)\) controls left multiplication. These are Kraus-map specializations of the preceding abstract domains, with the names interchanged: here the subscript records the side on which the varying factor is appended, whereas the preceding convention records the side occupied by the fixed element.
A Kraus map is trace-preserving if \(\sum _{i=0}^{d-1} K_i^\dagger K_i = \mathbb {1}\). Equivalently, the adjoint Kraus map is unital. This is the standard MPS normalization condition. In the later gauge language it is the left-canonical condition, so Kadison–Schwarz arguments are often applied to the adjoint map.
The trace-pairing adjoint \(E^* : M_{D'}(\mathbb {C}) \to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) of a linear map \(E : M_{D}(\mathbb {C}) \to M_{D'}(\mathbb {C})\) between matrix algebras of possibly different dimensions is the adjoint for the bilinear pairing \((A,B)\mapsto \operatorname{tr}(AB)\).
Consider the linear map \(T : M_{2}(\mathbb {C}) \to M_{2}(\mathbb {C})\) defined by
This is the map from [ Wol12 , Example 5.3 ] .
A map in rectangular Kraus form sends positive semidefinite matrices to positive semidefinite matrices. Every trace-preserving completely positive Kraus map is a completely positive Kraus map.
Let \(A\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be positive semidefinite, let \(c\in \mathbb {C}\), and let \(\psi \in \mathbb {C}^D\). If \(A\leq c|\psi \rangle \! \langle \psi |\), then there is a non-negative scalar \(a\) such that \(A=a|\psi \rangle \! \langle \psi |\).
Let \(E:M_{D_{\rm in}}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D_{\rm out}}(\mathbb {C})\) be a \(2\)-positive complex-linear map. For every \(A,B\in M_{D_{\rm in}}(\mathbb {C})\) and all \(v,w\in \mathbb C^{D_{\rm out}}\) such that \(E(B^\dagger B)\, w = E(B^\dagger A)\, v\), we have
This is the pseudoinverse-free form of [ Wol12 , Eq. (5.4) ] : the usual statement \(E(A^\dagger B)\, E(B^\dagger B)^{-1}E(B^\dagger A)\le E(A^\dagger A)\) (with inverse taken on the range) follows by taking \(w = E(B^\dagger B)^{+}E(B^\dagger A)\, v\).
If \(E\) satisfies the Schwarz inequality, then
Consequently, \(A\in \mathcal{A}(E)\) exactly when both equalities hold. This is [ Wol12 , Equations (5.13)–(5.14) ] .
Let \(E:M_{D_{\rm in}}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D_{\rm out}}(\mathbb {C})\) be a \(2\)-positive complex-linear map. For every \(A,B\in M_{D_{\rm in}}(\mathbb {C})\),
Let \(E(X) = \sum _i K_i X K_i^\dagger \) be a unital Kraus map, so that \(\sum _i K_i K_i^\dagger = \mathbb {1}\). Then, for every \(X \in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\),
This is [ Wol12 , Equation (5.2) ] .
Let \(E:M_{D_{\rm in}}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D_{\rm out}}(\mathbb {C})\) be a \(2\)-positive complex-linear map. For every \(A,B\in M_{D_{\rm in}}(\mathbb {C})\), \(\ker (E(B^\dagger B))\subseteq \ker (E(A^\dagger B))\) as subspaces of \(\mathbb C^{D_{\rm out}}\).
For a unital Kraus map \(E\), the Kadison–Schwarz gap decomposes as
Let \(E\) be a Kraus map that is both unital and trace-preserving. If \(E(X) = \mu X\) with \(|\mu | = 1\), then the Kadison–Schwarz gap vanishes:
Let \(E\) be a unital Kraus map. Then
Together these are the Kraus-map specialization of Theorem 6.8.1.3.
For a unital Kraus map \(E\), both \(\mathcal{A}_R(E)\) and \(\mathcal{A}_L(E)\) are unital subalgebras of \(M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\).
Let \(f : M_{D}(\mathbb {C}) \to \mathbb {C}\) be a complex-linear functional, where \(D{\gt}0\). If \(f(X) \geq 0\) for every \(X \geq 0\) and \(f(\mathbb {1})=1\), then there is a density matrix \(\rho \in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) such that \(f(X) = \operatorname{tr}(\rho X)\) for every \(X \in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\).
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be positive with \(T(\mathbb {1})\le \mathbb {1}\). If \(a\le 0\le b\) and \(a\mathbb {1}\le A\le b\mathbb {1}\), then
This is the matrix form of [ Wol12 , Equation (5.21) ] .
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be positive with \(T(\mathbb {1})\le \mathbb {1}\), and let \(A\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be Hermitian. If \(\operatorname{spec}(A)\subseteq [a,b]\) with \(a\le 0\le b\), then
This is [ Wol12 , Equation (5.21) ] .
Let \(S\subseteq M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be a unital \(*\)-subalgebra, and let \(E:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be a positive complex-linear map whose image lies in \(S\) and whose restriction to \(S\) is the identity. There are positive integers \(d_k,m_k\), a unitary \(U\), and density matrices \(\rho _k\in M_{m_k}(\mathbb {C})\) such that
and, for every \(A\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\),
Equivalently, cyclicity of the partial trace permits the factor \(\rho _k\otimes \mathbb {1}_{d_k}\) to be placed on the right of \((U^*AU)_{kk}\). This is [ Wol12 , Proposition 1.5 and Equation (1.40) ] .
Let \(m,d{\gt}0\), and let \(E:M_{md}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{md}(\mathbb {C})\) be a positive complex-linear map. Suppose that the image of \(E\) is contained in \(\mathbb {1}_m\otimes M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\) and that \(E(\mathbb {1}_m\otimes X)=\mathbb {1}_m\otimes X\) for every \(X\in M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\). Then there is a density matrix \(\rho \in M_{m}(\mathbb {C})\) such that, for every \(A\in M_{md}(\mathbb {C})\),
This is the one-factor case of [ Wol12 , Proposition 1.5 and Equation (1.40) ] .
Let \(T:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be complex-linear. Suppose that for every \(v\in \mathbb {C}^D\) there is a scalar \(c_v\in \mathbb {C}\) such that \(T(|v\rangle \! \langle v|)=c_v|v\rangle \! \langle v|\). Then there is a scalar \(c\in \mathbb {C}\) such that \(T=c\, \operatorname{id}\).
Let \(P \in M_{D_1}(\mathbb {C})\) and \(R \in M_{D_2}(\mathbb {C})\) be positive semidefinite, and let \(Q \in M_{D_1,D_2}(\mathbb {C})\). The following are equivalent:
The block matrix \(\begin{pmatrix} P & Q \\ Q^\dagger & R \end{pmatrix}\) is positive semidefinite.
One has \(\ker (R)\subseteq \ker (Q)\) and \(P\geq QR^+Q^\dagger \).
One has \(\ker (R)\subseteq \ker (Q)\), \(\ker (P)\subseteq \ker (Q^\dagger )\), and \(Q=P^{1/2}KR^{1/2}\) for the canonical support contraction \(K\), with \(\lVert K\rVert _\infty \leq 1\).
Here \(R^+\) denotes the pseudoinverse. The second support condition in the third clause is necessary in the singular case and is absent from the printed statement of Wolf’s Theorem 5.2.
For every linear map \(E : M_{D}(\mathbb {C}) \to M_{D'}(\mathbb {C})\), every \(\rho \in M_{D'}(\mathbb {C})\), and every \(X \in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), one has
Let \(E:M_{D_{\rm in}}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D_{\rm out}}(\mathbb {C})\) be a \(2\)-positive complex-linear map. For every \(A,B\in M_{D_{\rm in}}(\mathbb {C})\),
where \((\cdot )^+\) is the Moore–Penrose pseudoinverse, i.e. the inverse taken on the range. No vector witness is assumed to exist.
Let \(E:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be a positive linear map such that, for a given \(B\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\), the per-\(B\) Schwarz hypothesis holds (Definition 6.9.2.7). Then for every \(A\in \mathcal{A}_B\) (Definition 6.9.2.8) and every \(X\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\),
This is the source’s equality theorem, local source Notes/WolfNoteTexSource/ch05_schwarz_inequalities.tex, line 198.
Let \(E:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be a Kraus map satisfying \(E(\mathbb {1})=\mathbb {1}\). Every eigenvalue \(\mu \) of \(E\) satisfies
This is the unital Kraus specialization of [ Wol12 , Proposition 6.1 ] .
Let \(E:M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\) be a Kraus map satisfying \(E(\mathbb {1})=\mathbb {1}\). Then, for every \(X\in M_{D}(\mathbb {C})\),
Let \(A,B\in M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\) be Hermitian. If \(A\leq B\), then their decreasingly ordered eigenvalues satisfy
This is the consequence of [ Wol12 , Equation (5.56) ] used immediately before Proposition 5.3.
Let \(E=T^*:M_{D_{\rm in}}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D_{\rm out}}(\mathbb {C})\) be a positive complex-linear map. If \(T:M_{D_{\rm out}}(\mathbb {C})\to M_{D_{\rm in}}(\mathbb {C})\) is \(2\)-positive, then for all \(A,B\in M_{D_{\rm in}}(\mathbb {C})\),
This is exactly [ Wol12 , Theorem 5.3 and Eq. (5.4) ] , with the inverse taken on the range.
Let \(A,B\in M_{d}(\mathbb {C})\) be Hermitian. The corrected form of [ Wol12 , Proposition 5.3 and Equation (5.57) ] is, with \(\mathcal U(d)\) denoting the unitary matrices,
In particular, the unitary is chosen before the interval and the function; it depends only on \(A\) and \(B\). No continuity hypothesis on \(f\) is required, since both spectra are finite.